Pembrolizumab for Patients With PD-L1 Positive Advanced Carcinoid or Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results From the KEYNOTE-028 Study

Similar documents
Immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer

Supplementary Online Content

Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Combination Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

CONSIDERATIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF PEMBROLIZUMAB IN MSI-H CANCERS

Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer. Aurelio B. Castrellon Medical Oncology Memorial Healthcare System

Patient Selection: The Search for Immunotherapy Biomarkers

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Braine-l Alleud, Belgium; 12 MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

Metastatic NSCLC: Expanding Role of Immunotherapy. Evan W. Alley, MD, PhD Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Presbyterian

Checkpoint-Inhibitoren beim Lungenkarzinom. Dr. Helge Bischoff Thoraxklinik Heidelberg

Presenter Disclosure Information

Immunotherapy for NSCLC: Current State of the Art and Future Directions. H. Jack West, MD Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle, Washington, United States

Checkpointinhibitoren in der Uro-Onkologie. Carsten Grüllich

Emerging Strategies in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background. Capdevila J, et al. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 8): Abstract 1307O. 1. Dasari A, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(10):

Immunotherapy in Treating Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Dora Kwong Department of Clinical Oncology Queen Mary Hospital The University of Hong Kong

CheckMate 012: Safety and Efficacy of First Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Lung Cancer William N. William Jr.

Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers. Robert F. Taylor, MD Aurora Health Care

Use of Single-Arm Cohorts/Trials to Demonstrate Clinical Benefit for Breakthrough Therapies. Eric H. Rubin, MD Merck Research Laboratories

METRIC Study Key Eligibility Criteria

NSCLC: immunotherapy as a first-line treatment. Paolo Bironzo Oncologia Polmonare AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga Orbassano (To)

Checkpoint Inibitors for Bladder Cancer

Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers. Barbara Burtness, MD Yale University

Inmunoterapia en el carcinoma de Células de Merkel. Jaume Capdevila Hospital Universitari Vall d Hebron Barcelona

Post-ASCO 2017 Cancer du sein Triple Négatif

First-Line Ribociclib + Letrozole for Postmenopausal Women With HR+, HER2-, Advanced Breast Cancer: First Results From the Phase III MONALEESA-2 Study

Nivolumab in Patients With DNA Mismatch Repair Deficient/Microsatellite Instability High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Update From CheckMate 142

Karcinom dojke. PANEL: Semir Bešlija, Zdenka Gojković, Robert Šeparović, Tajana Silovski

Kamakshi V Rao, PharmD, BCOP, FASHP University of North Carolina Medical Center UPDATE IN REFRACTORY HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

An Open-Label Phase Ib/II Study of Sulfatinib in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors (NCT )

Phase 1 Study Combining Anti-PD-L1 (MEDI4736) With BRAF (Dabrafenib) and/or MEK (Trametinib) Inhibitors in Advanced Melanoma

Practice changing studies in lung cancer 2017

TRACTAMENT ONCOLÒGIC DELS TUMORS NEUROENDOCRINS METASTÀSICS

II sessione. Immunoterapia oltre la prima linea. Alessandro Tuzi ASST Sette Laghi, Varese

Immunotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma: Where Do We Stand? Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD St. Luke s Cancer Center Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Conversations in Oncology. November Kerry Hotel Pudong, Shanghai China

Opzioni terapeutiche nel paziente ALK-traslocato

Cancer Immunotherapy Patient Forum. for the Treatment of Melanoma, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Lung and Genitourinary Cancers - November 7, 2015

Update on the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Nivolumab: esperienze italiane nel carcinoma polmonare avanzato

ASCO 2017 updates in Colorectal and Gastric Cancers. May Cho, M.D.

Eric Van Cutsem University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium

Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Kidney and Bladder Cancer

Pembrolizumab in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Phase 2 KEYNOTE-087 Study

CENTENE PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS DRUG REVIEW 3Q17 April May

Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Virtual Journal Club: Front-Line Therapy and Beyond Recent Perspectives on ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Osimertinib Activity in Patients With Leptomeningeal Disease From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Results From the BLOOM Study

Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc): Results of a phase I trial

Merck ASCO 2015 Investor Briefing

6/7/16. Melanoma. Updates on immune checkpoint therapies. Molecularly targeted therapies. FDA approval for talimogene laherparepvec (T- VEC)

Atezolizumab Is a Humanized Anti-PDL1 Antibody That Inhibits the Binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 and B7.1

III Sessione I risultati clinici

KEYTRUDA is also indicated in combination with pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy for the

The next wave of successful drug therapy strategies in HER2-positive breast cancer. Hans Wildiers University Hospitals Leuven Belgium

Il ruolo di PD-L1 (42%) tra la prima e la seconda linea di trattamento

Expert Review: The Role of PARP Inhibition in the Treatment of Breast Cancer. Reference Slides

Developping the next generation of studies in RCC

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma. Catherine Hildyard Haematology Senior Registrar Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

INMUNOTERAPIA I. Dra. Virginia Calvo

Immunotherapy in lung cancer. Saurabh maji

Small cell lung cancer. Targeted agents in SCLC

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): SAR (iniparib)

Weitere Kombinationspartner der Immunotherapie

Recent advances in the management of metastatic breast cancer in older adults

Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer Clinical Development

Lung Cancer Case. Since the patient was symptomatic, a targeted panel was sent. ALK FISH returned in 2 days and was positive.

Now Available: Final Rule for FDAAA 801 and NIH Policy on Clinical Trial Reporting

Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors Expert Perspectives on The New Data Sunday, June 5, 2016

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin and non-hodgkin Lymphoma: How do they work? Where will we use them? Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic

Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer

Terapia Immunomodulante e Target Therapies nel Trattamento del Melanoma Metastatico

Reflex Testing Guidelines for Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

La revolución de la inmunoterapia: dónde la posicionamos? Javier Puente, MD, PhD

Principles and Application of Immunotherapy for Cancer: Advanced NSCLC

Targeted therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Tom Stinchcombe Duke Cancer Insitute

Largos Supervivientes, Tenemos datos?

Immunotherapy in the clinic. Lung Cancer. Marga Majem 20 octubre 2017

Heme Onc Today New York Melanoma Meeting March 22-23, 2013 PD-1 antibodies

Presentation Number: LBA18_PR. Lecture Time: 09:15-09:27. Speakers: Heinz-Josef J. Lenz (Los Angeles, US) Background

A Giant Leap in the Treatment Options for Advanced Bladder Cancer

Recent developments of oncology in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)

Evolving Paradigms in HER2+ MBC: Strategies for Individualizing Therapy with Available Agents

Immunotherapy for Metastatic Malignant Melanoma. Dr Daniel A Vorobiof Sandton Oncology Centre Johannesburg

Fifteenth International Kidney Cancer Symposium

Melanoma. Il parere dell esperto. V. Ferraresi. Divisione di Oncologia Medica 1

The Rationale for Immunotherapy as an Adjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced BC

Overview: Immunotherapy in CNS Metastases

PTAC meeting held on 5 & 6 May (minutes for web publishing)

Policy #: 668 Effective Date: December 1, 2016 Category: Pharmacology Latest Review Date: September 2016

Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma. James Larkin

ALK positive Lung Cancer. Shirish M. Gadgeel, MD. Director of the Thoracic Oncology program University of Michigan

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT Adi Diab 1, Nizar Tannir 1, Daniel Cho

Presentation by Dr. Thomas Yau on behalf of his co-authors

Immunotherapy, an exciting era!!

IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS

Is There a Future for Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer?

DYNAMO: A PHASE 2 STUDY OF DUVELISIB IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY INDOLENT NON HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

Evolution of Early Phase Trials: Clinical Trial Design in the Modern Era

Transcription:

Pembrolizumab for Patients With PD-L1 Positive Advanced Carcinoid or Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results From the KEYNOTE-28 Study Abstract 427O Mehnert JM, Bergsland E, O Neil BH, Santoro A, Schellens JHM, Cohen RB, Doi T, Ott PA, Pishvaian MJ, Puzanov I, Aung KL, Hsu C, Le Tourneau C, Soria J-C, Élez E, Tamura K, Gould M, Zhao G, Stein K, Piha-Paul SA

Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) and Pembrolizumab Tumors can exploit the PD-1 pathway to escape T-cell induced antitumor activity 1 Binding of PD-1 to PD-L1 and PD-L2 inhibits T-cell antitumor immune response Tumors express varying levels of PD-L1 Pembrolizumab is a high-affinity antibody against PD-1 that blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2 Robust antitumor activity and favorable safety profile in multiple tumor types Sui X, et al. Oncotarget. 215;6(23):19393-1944.

Rationale for Pembrolizumab in Carcinoids and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (pnets) Systemic therapies are available for patients with advanced or metastatic carcinoids/pnets 1-3 Dependent on tumor type, systemic therapy may include Somatostatin analogues, cytotoxic chemotherapy, everolimus, interferon-2α, cisplatin/carboplatin plus etoposide, sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy Many patients experience treatment failure or are unable to receive standard therapy 4 Prolonged survival with pembrolizumab in melanoma 5, non-small cell lung cancer 6,7, and urothelial cancer 8 suggested potential antitumor activity in other solid tumors 1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Neuroendocrine tumors, V3.217. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/neuroendocrine.pdf. 2. Öberg K, et al. Ann Oncol. 212;23(Suppl 7):vii12-vii123. 3. Öberg K, et al. Ann Oncol. 212;23(Suppl 7):vii124-vii13. 4. Kunz, PL. J Clin Oncol. 215;33(16):1855-1863. 5. Robert C, et al. Lancet. 214;384(9948):119-1117. 6. Garon EB, et al. N Engl J Med. 215;372(21):218-228. 7. Herbst RS, et al. Lancet. 216;387(127):154-155. 8. Bellmunt J, et al. N Engl J Med. 217;376:115-126.

KEYNOTE-28 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT25486) Multicohort phase 1b study evaluating safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in a variety of PD-L1 positive advanced solid tumors This is the first report from the carcinoid and pnet cohorts of KEYNOTE-28 Results from a biomarker evaluation across all cohorts are being presented separately in abstract 84PD Ott P, et al. Relationship of PD-L1 and a T-cell inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) to clinical response in a multicohort trial of solid tumors (KEYNOTE [KN]28)

KEYNOTE-28 (NCT25486): Phase Ib Multicohort Study of Pembrolizumab for PD-L1+ Advanced Solid Tumors Patients Carcinoid tumors or well or moderately differentiated pnets Failure of or inability to receive standard therapy ECOG PS or 1 1 measurable lesion PD-L1 positivity a No autoimmune disease or interstitial lung disease Pembrolizumab 1 mg/kg IV q2w Response assessment* CR, PR, or SD Confirmed PD b or unacceptable toxicity Treat for 24 months or until progression b or intolerable toxicity Discontinue pembrolizumab *Response assessment: Every 8 weeks for first 6 months; every 12 weeks thereafter Primary endpoints: ORR per RECIST v1.1 (investigator review) Secondary endpoints: PFS, OS, duration of response, and safety a At least 1% modified proportion score or interface pattern (QualTek IHC using 22C3 antibody clone); b If SD or better when pembrolizumab discontinued and subsequently have PD, patients may be eligible to resume pembrolizumab for 1 year; c If clinically stable, patients are to remain on pembrolizumab until progressive disease is confirmed on a second scan performed 4 weeks later

Analysis of PD-L1 Expression Tumor samples: archival or newly obtained core or excisional biopsy of a nonirradiated lesion Immunohistochemistry: assessed at central laboratory using QualTek assay and 22C3 antibody clone Positivity: membranous PD-L1 expression in 1% of cells in tumor nests or positive bands in stroma Examples of PD-L1 staining in neuroendocrine tumor specimens from KEYNOTE-28 PD-L1 negative PD-L1 positive

PD-L1 Screening: Carcinoid/pNET Cohorts Patients screened for PD-L1 Carcinoid, n = 179 pnet, n = 19 Not evaluable (N = 9) Not evaluable (N = 3) Samples evaluable for PD-L1 Carcinoid, n = 17 pnet, n = 16 2.6% PD-L1 + PD-L1 positive tumors Carcinoid, n = 35 pnet, n = 26 24.5% PD-L1 + Patients treated as of January 1, 217 Carcinoid, N = 25 pnet, N = 16 a Patients with CNS metastases that were stable for 4 weeks could enroll

Characteristic Median age, years (range) Carcinoid N = 25 a Patients could have received 1 type of prior therapy Data cutoff date: February 2, 217 Baseline Characteristics pnet N = 16 Characteristic, n (%) Carcinoid N = 25 63. (43 81) 61. (35 8) Stable brain metastases, n (%) 1 (4) Male, n (%) 8 (32) 5 (31) Race, n (%) White Asian Black or African American Other/not specified ECOG PS, n (%) 1 Metastatic staging MX M M1 Unknown/missing 15 (6) 5 (2) 3 (12) 2 (8) 6 (24) 19 (76) 2 (8) 21 (84) 2 (8) 9 (56) 2 (13) 3 (19) 2 (13) 1 (63) 6 (38) 1 (6) 2 (13) 11 (69) 2 (13) Site of disease, n (%) Lung Gut Other Prior therapies for recurrent/metastatic disease, n (%) 1 2 Unknown Select prior therapies, a n (%) Chemotherapy Somatostatin analogues Everolimus Sunitinib Investigational therapy 9 (36) 7 (28) 9 (36) 3 (12) 5 (2) 11 (44) 6 (24) 18 (72) 6 (24) 3 (12) 3 (12) pnet N = 16 1 (6) 5 (31) 8 (5) 2 (13) 9 (56) 6 (38) 1 (63) 4 (25) 1 (6)

Treatment-Related AEs: Carcinoid Occurring in 1% patients n (%) Any 17 (68) Diarrhea 7 (28) Fatigue 6 (24) Hypothyroidism 4 (16) Pyrexia 3 (12) Weight decreased 3 (12) Decreased appetite 3 (12) AST increase 3 (12) ALT increase 3 (12) Median follow-up: 2.2 months (range, 2.-34.7) No grade 4 or 5 events occurred Grade 3 n (%) Any 8 (32) Diarrhea 3 (12) ALT increase 2 (8) AST increase 2 (8) Feces discolored 1 (4) Fatigue 1 (4) Decreased appetite 1 (4) Hyperglycemia 1 (4) Hypovolemia 1 (4) Arthralgia 1 (4) Dyspnea 1 (4) Pneumonitis 1 (4) Dermatitis 1 (4) ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase Data cutoff date: February 2, 217

Treatment-Related AEs: pnet Occurring in 1% Patients n (%) Any 11 (69) Fatigue 6 (38) Diarrhea 4 (25) Pruritus 3 (19) Hypothyroidism 2 (13) Myalgia 2 (13) Rash 2 (13) Grade 3 n (%) Any 1 (6) Fatigue 1 (6) No grade 4 or 5 events occurred Median follow-up duration: 2.7 months (range, 4.5-31.7) Data cutoff date: February 2, 217

Antitumor Activity (RECIST v1.1, investigator review a ) Carcinoid (N = 25) pnet (N = 16) Objective response rate, % (95% CI) 12% (3-31) 6% (.2-3) Best overall response, n (%) Complete response Partial response 3 (12%) 1 (6%) Stable disease 15 (6%) 14 (88%) 6 months 8 (32%) 5 (31%) Progressive disease 7 (28%) 1 (6%) a Only confirmed responses are included Data cutoff date: February 2, 217

Change From Baseline in Tumor Size (RECIST v1.1, investigator review) Change From Baseline, % 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 Carcinoid Change From Baseline, % 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8 pnet -1 Partial response Stable disease Progressive disease Data cutoff date: February 2, 217

Longitudinal Change From Baseline in Tumor Size (RECIST v1.1, investigator review) Change From Baseline, % 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 Carcinoid 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Time, Months Change From Baseline, % 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 pnet 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Time, Months Responder Nonresponder Data cutoff date: February 2, 217

Treatment Exposure and Response Duration (RECIST v1.1, investigator review) Carcinoid pnet Median (range) (n =3 ) Time, months (n = 1) Time to response 1.9 months (1.5-1.9) Time to response 1.8 months Duration of response Partial response Progressive disease 9.2 months (6.9-11.1) Duration of response Partial response Progressive disease Ongoing response 2.3 months (ongoing) 5 1 1 5 2 2 5 5 1 1 5 2 2 5 Time, Months Time, Months Bar length is equivalent to the time to the last imaging assessment Data cutoff date: February 2, 217

Progression-Free Survival (RECIST v1.1, investigator review) Carcinoid pnet 1 44% 27% 1 4% 27% Progression-Free Survival, % 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 Median (95% CI) 5.6 (3.5-1.7) 1 Median (95% CI) 4.5 (3.6-8.3) 5 1 15 2 25 No. at risk Time, months Progression-Free Survival, % 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 5 1 15 2 25 No. at risk Time, months 25 16 8 4 2 16 7 4 2 2 Data cutoff date: February 2, 217

Carcinoid Overall Survival pnet Overall Survival, % 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 83% 65% 93% 87% Median (95% CI) 21.1 (9.1-22.4) 5 1 15 2 25 3 Time, months Overall Survival, % 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Median (95% CI) 21. (2.2-NR) 5 1 15 2 25 3 Time, months No. at risk No. at risk 25 2 15 11 7 1 16 14 14 12 7 Data cutoff date: February 2, 217

Conclusions Pembrolizumab was generally well-tolerated in both study cohorts Safety profile was consistent with previous experience for pembrolizumab monotherapy in other tumor types Pembrolizumab provided an ORR of 12% in patients with carcinoid tumors and 6% in patients with pnets Responses were durable, with all lasting 6 months Median time to response was <2 months in both cohorts Given the heavily pretreated patient populations, the 12-month PFS and OS rates were encouraging Further evaluation of pembrolizumab in carcinoids and pnets is warranted KEYNOTE-158 is evaluating pembrolizumab in larger cohorts of patients with advanced solid tumors, including neuroendocrine tumors, with additional biomarker evaluation 1 1. National Institutes of Health, Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/nct262867.