STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

Similar documents
THE BRIDGE-ACS TRIAL

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

In-Ho Chae. Seoul National University College of Medicine

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club. 24 May 2018

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

Cindy L. Grines MD FACC FSCAI

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Is the role of bivalirudin established?

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Supplementary Online Content

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

10-Year Mortality of Older Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated in U.S. Community Practice

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

CPORT E Trial. Atlantic C PORT

Statin pretreatment and presentation patterns in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

Supplementary Online Content

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016

Surgical vs. Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

Optimal Duration and Dose of Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI

The Changing Landscape of Managing Patients with PAD- Update on the Evidence and Practice of Care in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Swiss Cardiovascular Center and Clinical Trials Unit Bern Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

Διάρκεια διπλής αντιαιμοπεταλιακής αγωγής. Νικόλαος Γ.Πατσουράκος Καρδιολόγος, Επιμελητής Α ΕΣΥ Τζάνειο Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Πειραιά

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

TCT mdbuyline.com Clinical Trial Results Summary

Low Dose Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 Inhibition, in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1)

Is there enough evidence for DAPT after endovascular intervention for PAOD?

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Coronary Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China 10-Year Results From the China PEACE-Retrospective CathPCI Study

An update on the management of UA / NSTEMI. Michael H. Crawford, MD

Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment: Approach & Guidelines

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Ely Lilly, Merck.

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

PRASUGREL HYDROCHLORIDE (Effient Eli Lilly Canada Inc.) Indication: Acute Coronary Syndrome

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

Culprit PCI vs MultiVessel PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, On the behalf of SMART-DATE trial investigators ACC LBCT 2018

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

Unprotected LM intervention

Bern-Rotterdam Cohort Study

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Asian AMI Registry Session The 17 th Joint Meeting of Coronary Revascularization (JCR 2017) Busan, Korea Dec 8 th 2017

Treatment Options for Angina

CLINICAL DECISION USING AN ARTICLE ABOUT TREATMENT JOSEFINA S. ISIDRO LAPENA MD, MFM, FPAFP PROFESSOR, UPCM

6/1/18 LEARNING OBJECTIVES PATIENT POPULATION PRESENTATIONS

American College of Cardiology

Cardiovascular risk reduction in diabetes Lipids (NICE CG181)

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

The MAIN-COMPARE Registry

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATelet Inhibition and patient Outcomes trial

PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia study

Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in ACS/PCI Which one to choose? V. Voudris MD FESC FACC 2 nd Cardiology Division Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Coronary Artery Disease: Revascularization (Teacher s Guide)

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Strategy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation ACS

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

ANGIOPLASY SUMMIT 2007 TCT ASIA PACIFIC. Seoul, Korea: April The problem is exaggerated: Data from Real World Registries

Non ST Elevation-ACS. Michael W. Cammarata, MD

MINERVA MEDICA COPYRIGHT. Aspirin is accepted as standard antiplatelet. Dual antiplatelet therapy for primary and secondary prevention

CORONARY: The Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off or On Pump Revascularization Study. Results at 1 Year

Osler Journal Club Outcomes Research

Critical Review Form Therapy Objectives: Methods:

Drug-Coated Balloons for Small Coronary Artery Disease: BASKET-SMALL 2

Coronary Artery Stenosis. Insight from MAIN-COMPARE Study

Antiplatelet Therapy in Primary CVD Prevention and Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Καρακώστας Γεώργιος Διευθυντής Καρδιολογικής Κλινικής, Γ.Ν.

FAME STUDY: 2-year Follow-Up & CLINICAL SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

Subsequent management and therapies

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT ) Title: The Italian Elderly ACS Study Author: Stefano Savonitto. Date: 29 August 2011 Meeting: ESC congress, Paris

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Made Practical

Supplementary Online Content

Inspiron Stent. Clinical Research Program. Pedro A. Lemos MD PhD. Heart Institute InCor University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil

Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary Disease (BEST Trial)

Rationale for Percutaneous Revascularization ESC 2011

Transcription:

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION Otávio Berwanger, MD, FACS - On behalf of the SECURE Steering Committee and Investigators

Trial Organization Trial Steering Committee Dr. Otávio Berwanger (Co-Chair) Dr Renato Delascio Lopes (Co-Chair) Dr Luiz Alberto Mattos Dr. Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti Dr. Pedro G. M. de Barros e Silva Dr. Hélio Penna Guimarães Dr. Amanda Sousa Dr. José Eduardo Sousa Dr. Roberto Giraldez Dr. Christopher B. Granger Dr. John H. Alexander Study Coordinating Offices Research Institute Heart Hospital (HCor) Brazilian Clinical Research Institute (BCRI)

BACKGROUND IMPORTANCE The effect of loading dose of statins in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is uncertain since the evidence is limited to studies with low numbers of events, and different statin doses and regimens. OBJECTIVE To determine if periprocedural loading doses of atorvastatin decreases 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS and planned invasive management.

SECURE PCI TRIAL Design: pragmatic, multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial Prevention of Bias: Concealed allocation (central web-based randomization) and Intention-to-treat analysis Blinding of patients, physicians and adjudicator assessors Quality control: on-site monitoring + central statistical checking + e-crf + central adjudication of outcomes Sample Size: 4,192 patients from 58 hospitals in Brazil, considering incidence of MACE = 12.3%, 25% relative risk reduction (RRR), with 90% statistical power, and two-tailed alpha of 5%

ELIGIBILITY Inclusion criteria Both genders, Aged 18 years Acute Coronary Syndrome intended to be treated with PCI (including those with ST segment elevation MI treated with primary angioplasty) Exclusion criteria Pregnant and breastfeeding women or women aged <45 not using effective contraceptive methods; Previous inclusion in the study; Refusal to sign the informed consent form (ICF); Concurrent participation in other RCTs with hypolipemiant agents; Drug hypersensitivity; History of advanced liver disease; Use of any statin at a maximum dose in the last 24 hours before PCI; Use of any fibrate in the last 24 hours before the loading dose of the study.

FLOWCHART Patients with age 18 years and with Acute Coronary Syndrome intended to be treated with PCI 80mg pre-procedure, followed by 80mg 24 hours after PCI RANDOMIZATION Conventional management pre-procedure, followed by placebo 24 hours after PCI 40mg/day for 30 days 40mg/day for 30 days Primary outcome: MACE at 30 days (all-cause mortality, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, stroke or recurrent ischemia leading to urgent revascularization)

OUTCOMES Primary Outcome Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and unplanned coronary revascularization Secondary Outcomes Individual components of primary outcome over 30 days Cardiovascular mortality at 30 days Stent thrombosis at 30 days Target vessel revascularization at 30 days Coronary revascularization * All outcomes were adjudicated by standardized criteria

BASELINE Characteristic (n=2087) (n=2104) Age, mean (SD), years 61.7 (11.3) 61.9 (11.7) Male sex, No.(%) 1581 (75.8) 1525 (72.5) Initial Diagnosis, No.(%) STEMI 495 (24.4) 517 (25.2) NSTEMI 1241 (61.1) 1236 (60.3) Unstable angina 295 (14.5) 296 (14.4) Previous use of chronic statin therapy (6 months before randomization), No.(%) 608 (29.2) 600 (28.5) Medical history, No.(%) Hypertension 1475 (70.7) 1499/(71.3) Hypercholesterolemia 755 (36.2) 764 (36.3) Diabetes mellitus 653 (31.3) 673 (32.0) Tobacco use 564 (27.1) 618 (29.4) Previous MI 342 (16.4) 320 (15.2) Previous Stroke 74 (3.5) 76 (3.6) Renal Impairment 60 (2.9) 73 (3.5) Obesity 324 (15.5) 339 (16.1)

Characteristic BASELINE (n=2087) (n=2104) Initial Treatment strategy, No.(%) PCI 1351 (64.8) 1359 (64.7) CABG 162 (7.8) 171 (8.1) Medical Management 572 (27.4) 572 (27.2) Reason why PCI was not performed, No.(%) Clinical treatment 450 (61.3) 472 (63.5) CABG 162 (22.1) 171 (23.0) Not a final diagnosis of ACS 109 (14.9) 88 (11.8) Unknown 13 (1.8) 12 (1.6) Other medical therapy, No.(%) Aspirin 1880 (90.2) 1883 (89.6) Clopidogrel/Ticagrelor/Prasugrel 1775 (85.1) 1766 (84.0) Beta-blockers 1606 (77.0) 1599 (76.1) ACE inhibitors or ARA 1484 (71.2) 1444 (68.7) Time from hospital admission to PCI (hours) Mean (SD) 47.8 (66.6) 45.3 (63.8) Median (Interquartile range) 20 (3 72) 19 (3 64) Time from randomization to PCI (hours) Mean (SD) 7.2 (88.8) 9.1 (59.2) Median (Interquartile range) 3 (1 6) 3 (1 6)

STUDY-DRUG ADMINISTRATION Characteristic (n=2087) (n=2104) First loading dose, No. (%) 2039 (97.8) 2054 (97.7) Second loading dose, No. (%) 1594 (76.5) 1622 (77.2) 40mg at 30-days, mean (SD). 85.1 (34.1) 87 (32.1) Time of study-drug administration in patients that underwent PCI, No.(%) (n=1349) (n=1357) More than 12h before PCI 50 (3.7) 76 (5.6) 2h to 12h before PCI 699 (51.7) 685 (50.5) Until 2h before PCI 577 (42.8) 569 (41.9) Until 2h after PCI 8 (0.6) 4 (0.3) 2h to 4h after PCI 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)

STUDY-DRUG ADMINISTRATION Characteristic Time from randomization to study drug (hours) (n=2087) (n=2104) Mean (SD) 6.1 (31.2) 5.2 (24.3) Median (Interquartile range) 0.1 (0-0.5) 0.2 (0-0.6) In patients that underwent PCI (n=1349) (n=1357) First loading dose, No. (%) 1337 (99) 1337 (98.4) Second loading dose, No. (%) 1292 (95.6) 1297 (95.4) 40mg at 30-days, mean (SD). 94.4 (20.2) 94.8 (19.7) Time of study-drug administration in patients that underwent PCI, No.(%) (n=1349) (n=1357) More than 12h before PCI 50 (3.7) 76 (5.6) 2h to 12h before PCI 699 (51.7) 685 (50.5) Until 2h before PCI 577 (42.8) 569 (41.9) Until 2h after PCI 8 (0.6) 4 (0.3) 2h to 4h after PCI 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)

Cumulative MACE incidence (%) CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF PRIMARY OUTCOME (ALL PATIENTS) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Hazard ratio 0.88 (95% CI, 0.69-1.11); p=.27 No. at risk 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 Time (days) 2104 2010 1989 1974 1968 1963 1958 1949 1946 1935 1897 2087 2002 1987 1966 1960 1956 1949 1942 1934 1920 1893 Event rates of the combined primary outcome (all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned coronary revascularization) occurrence in all patients.

OUTCOMES AT 30 DAYS ALL PATIENTS Outcomes (n=2087) (n=2104) Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Death, No.(%) 67 (3.2) 70 (3.3) 0.97 (0.69 to 1.35) 0.84 Cardiovascular Death 59 (2.8) 61 (2.9) 0.98 (0.68 to 1.40) 0.90 Myocardial Infarction, No.(%) 61 (2.9) 77 (3.7) 0.80 (0.57 to 1.11) 0.18 Peri-PCI MI 42 (2.0) 54 (2.6) 0.78 (0.52 to 1.17) 0.23 Non-PCI related MI 20 (1.0) 26 (1.2) 0.77 (0.43 to 1.39) 0.39 Coronary Revascularization, No.(%) 11 (0.5) 14 (0.7) 0.79 (0.36 to 1.75) 0.57 Urgent/Target Vessel 5 (0.2) 9 (0.4) 0.56 (0.19 to 1.67) 0.30 Stroke, No.(%) 10 (0.5) 11 (0.5) 0.92 (0.39 to 2.16) 0.85 Stent Thrombosis, No.(%) 7 (0.3) 15 (0.7) 0.47 (0.19 to 1.15) 0.10

Cumulative MACE incidence (%) CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF PRIMARY OUTCOME (PCI PATIENTS) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2, PCI, PCI Hazard ratio 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.96); p=.02 No. at risk 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 Time (days) 1359 1283 1267 1259 1257 1253 1249 1247 1244 1239 1216 1351 1295 1290 1276 1273 1270 1266 1261 1254 1248 1235 The primary outcome occurrence in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group and in patients who did not undergo percuateneous coronary intervention.

OUTCOMES AT 30 DAYS PCI PATIENTS Outcomes (n=1351) (n=1359) Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value MACE, No.(%) 81 (6.0) 112 (8.2) 0.72 (0.54 to 0.96) 0.02 Death, No.(%) 31 (2.3) 43 (3.2) 0.72 (0.46 to 1.15) 0.17 Cardiovascular Death 28 (2.1) 37 (2.7) 0.76 (0.46 to 1.24) 0.27 Myocardial Infarction, No.(%) 48 (3.6) 70 (5.2) 0.68 (0.47 to 0.99) 0.04 Peri-PCI MI 41 (3) 54 (4) 0.76 (0.51 to 1.14) 0.18 Non-PCI related MI 8 (0.6) 19 (1.4) 0.42 (0.18 to 0.96) 0.04 Coronary Revascularization, No.(%) 8 (0.6) 12 (0.9) 0.67 (0.27 to 1.63) 0.38 Urgent/Target Vessel 3 (0.2) 7 (0.5) 0.43 (0.11 to 1.66) 0.22 Stroke, No.(%) 4 (0.3) 8 (0.6) 0.50 (0.15 to 1.66) 0.26 Stent Thrombosis, No.(%) 7 (0.5) 15 (1.1) 0.47 (0.19 to 1.14) 0.10

Cumulative MACE incidence (%) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF PRIMARY OUTCOME (PCI AND NON-PCI PATIENTS), Non-PCI, Non-PCI, PCI, PCI PCI: Hazard ratio 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.96); p=.02 Non-PCI: Hazard ratio 1.36 (95% CI, 0.89-2.09); p=.15 No. at risk, Non-PCI Non-PCI, PCI, PCI 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 Time (days) 743 727 722 715 711 710 709 702 702 696 681 734 707 697 690 687 686 683 681 680 672 658 1359 1283 1267 1259 1257 1253 1249 1247 1244 1239 1216 1351 1295 1290 1276 1273 1270 1266 1261 1254 1248 1235 The primary outcome occurrence in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group and in patients who did not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.

SUBGROUP ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY OUTCOME (n=2087) (n=2104) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Favors Favors P Value for interaction Sex Male 95/1581 (6%) 104/1525 (6.8%) 0.88 (0.66-1.16) 0.96 Female 35/506 (6.9%) 45/579 (7.8%) 0.89 (0.57-1.38) Age (years) 65 62/1320 (4.7%) 77/1314 (5.9%) 0.80 (0.57-1.11) 0.41 > 65 68/767 (8.9%) 72/790 (9.1%) 0.97 (0.70-1.35) Type of ACS PCI STEMI 42/495 (8.5%) 65/517 (12.6%) 0.66 (0.45-0.98) 0.21 NSTEMI 73/1241 (5.9%) 69/1236 (5.6%) 1.05 (0.76-1.46) UA 10/295 (3.4%) 12/296 (4.1%) 0.83 (0.36-1.93) No 49/734 (6.7%) 37/743 (5%) 1.36 (0.89-2.09) 0.02 Yes 81/1351 (6%) 112/1359 (8.2%) 0.72 (0.54-0.96) Previous use of statin No 98/1477 (6.6%) 109/1502 (7.3%) 0.91 (0.69-1.20) 0.58 Yes 32/608 (5.3%) 40/600 (6.7%) 0.78 (0.49-1.24) Type of stents (patients who underwent PCI) At least one Drugeluting stent 56/1013 (5.5%) 82/1020 (8%) 0.68 (0.48-0.95) 0.18 Bare metal only 21/298 (7%) 26/312 (8.3%) 0.83 (0.47-1.48) 0.33 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.33 2.00 3.00

CONCLUSION Among patients with ACS and planned invasive management, periprocedural loading doses of atorvastatin did not reduce the rate of MACE at 30 days. These findings do not support the routine use of loading doses of atorvastatin among unselected patients with ACS and intended invasive management. However, among patients undergoing PCI, loading doses of atorvastatin seems to improve clinical periprocedural outcomes and might be an attractive treatment strategy for patients with acute coronary syndromes.

O Berwanger and coauthors Effect of Loading Dose of Prior to Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome: The SECURE-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial Published online March 11, 2018 Available at jama.com and on The JAMA Network Reader at mobile.jamanetwork.com jamanetwork.com