Subclinical AF: Implications of device based episodes

Similar documents
Defining Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation and its management

The Relationship Between Daily Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Burden From Implantable Device Diagnostics and Stroke Risk: The TRENDS Study

Fibrillazione atriale : causa diretta marker di rischio di eventi cerebrovascolari non solo embolici?

Device Diagnostics and Stroke Prevention: State of the Art

Identifying Patients for Anticoagulation: While Many Patients Remain Untreated, Who Should NOT be Anticoagulated?

Stroke Prevention in AF: How will it change in the next 5 years? Jeff Healey MD, MSc, FHRS Population Health Research Institute McMaster University

ECG monitoring after ischemic stroke of TIA of unknown source with an insertable monitor? YES

ΑΣΥΜΠΤΩΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΚΟΛΠΙΚΗ ΜΑΡΜΑΡΥΓΗ

Στυλιανός Τζέης MD, PhD, FESC

Thromboembolism During Sinus Rhythm in Patients with a History of Atrial Fibrillation

Continuous ECG telemonitoring with implantable devices: the expected clinical benefits

Implantable Cardiac Monitors for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Detection: Ready for Routine Use?

Atrial fibrillation: why it's important to make opportunities diagnosis in single chamber ICD patients

Θα πρέπει να αναζηηείηαι η παροσζία ζιωπηλής κολπικής μαρμαρσγή ζε αζθενείς με κρσπηογενές εγκεθαλικό επειζόδιο; Ποιά είναι η καλύηερη μέθοδος;

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

Consensus document: Screening and Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation

Diagnosing atrial fibrillation using implantable devices

ESC Stockholm Arrhythmias & pacing

Spontaneous Atrial Fibrillation and Noacs and Reversal agents

SUBCLINICAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH IMPLANTABLE DEVICEs ORAL ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY: TO GIVE OR NOT TO GIVE, THIS IS THE PROBLEM!!

Device detected AF and atrial high rate episodes

Atrial fibrillation and stroke. Isabelle C Van Gelder University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

Fibrillazione Atriale Fattore di Rischio o Marker di Stroke: Implicazioni Per La Terapia

AF detection: What s new? Christopher B. Granger

Anti-thromboticthrombotic drugs

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: REVISITING CONTROVERSIES IN AN ERA OF INNOVATION

Atrial fibrillation and advanced age

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

Secondary Preven-on of Thromboembolic Stroke: Clinical Data and Recommenda-ons from the ESC Atrial Fibrilla-on Guideline Update 2012

Atrial Fibrillation and the NOAC s. John Raymond MS, PA-C, MHP February 10, 2018

Transient Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Stroke after Acute Myocardial Infarction

AF Detection During Drug Development: What Constitutes a Signal

Risk Stratification for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: The emerging role of biomarkers

Evaluate Risk of Stroke & Bleeding in AF Patients

Antithrombotics in Stroke management

Causal relationship between AF & stroke

Causal relationship between AF & stroke

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Atrial Fibrillaiton and Heart Failure: Anticoagulation therapy in all cases?

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the. Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation, Embolic Risk, and Anticoagulant Treatment

Fibrillazione atriale: è sempre necessario ricercarla, e come?

Apixaban for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis

Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Detection and Management. 18 December nd Annual Advances in Heart Disease Palace Hotel, San Francisco

Conflict of interest statement

Mohammad Zubaid, MB, ChB, FRCPC, FACC

New options in Stroke Prevention in AF Paul Dorian University of Toronto St Michael s Hospital

Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death

Asif Serajian DO FACC FSCAI

A Patient Unsuitable for VKA Treatment

NeuroPI Case Study: Anticoagulant Therapy

What the general cardiologist should know about arrhythmia Stroke prevention in AF" Peter Ammann Kantonsspital St. Gallen

Newer Anti-Anginal Agents and Anticoagulants

Atrial Fibrillation. Ivan Anderson, MD RIHVH Cardiology

Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Leon Ptaszek, MD, PhD, FACC, FHRS 25 March 2018

Prepared by Pfizer-BMS alliance in response to an unsolicited request Not for further distribution

AF review. Petr Polasek

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Stents: Is Three Drugs Too Many?

Managing Atrial Fibrillation in the Heart Failure Patient

Updates in Stroke Management. Jessica A Starr, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS Associate Clinical Professor Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy

Stratificazione del rischio, corretto bilancio tra ischemia e bleeding: il beneficio clinico netto

Novel Anticoagulants : Bleeding and Bridging

KCS Congress: Impact through collaboration

Primary Prevention of Stroke

ESC Congress 2012, Munich

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: A Cause or a Consequence

IS THERE STILL A PLACE FOR VITAMINE K ANTAGONISTS?

Individual Therapeutic Selection Of Anti-coagulants And Periprocedural. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

Diagnostic capabilities of the implantable therapeutic systems

Cryptogenic Stroke: The role of silent Atrial Fibrillation

Weighing the risk of stroke vs the risk of bleeding: Which AF patients should be anticoagulated?

controversies in anticoagulation: optimizing outcome for atrial fibrillation

Global Variations in the 1-year Rates of Death and Stroke in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Atrial Fibrillation

Fred Kusumoto Professor of Medicine

Pros and Cons of Individual Agents Based on Large Trial Results: RELY, ROCKET, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES

Supplementary Online Content

Fibrillazione atriale subclinica e rischio di ictus ischemico

What s New in the AF Guidelines

Prof. Fiorenzo Gaita

Device Interrogation- Pacemakers, ICD and Loop Recorders. Dulce Obias-Manno, RN, MHSA, CCDS,CEPS, FHRS Device Clinic Coordinator, MHVI

Objectives. Falling Down on Warfarin Therapy. CHADS 2 Score. CHADS 2 & CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc Score. HAS-BLED Score 04/08/2014. Real World Application

Manuel Castellá Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Clínic, Universidad de

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

ADC Slides for Presentation 02/10/2017

Primary prevention of SCD with the ICD in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Anticoagulation Beyond Coumadin

Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter?

» A new drug s trial

Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting 경북대의전원내과조용근

Half Moon Bay Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. Dr. Roger A. Winkle MD. Silicon Valley Cardiology, PAMF, Sutter Health Sequoia Hospital

PCI in Patients with AF Optimizing Oral Anticoagulation Regimen

Management of atrial fibrillation a holistic view - Prof. Dr. Martin Borggrefe Mannheim

Stroke Update. Claire J. Creutzfeldt, MD January 12, 2018

Does AF Ablation Lower Stroke Risk? Hugh Calkins MD Professor of Medicine Director of Electrophysiology Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

Left Atrial Appendage Closure 4 questions Who? When? How? Results?

Antithrombotic Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Etexilate

Atrial Fibrillation Implementation challenges. Lesley Edgar Ross Maconachie

Thrombolysis-WAKE UP Intra-arterial interventions DEFUSE 3 Haemorrhagic Stroke - TICH 2 Secondary Prevention CROMIS 2 Secondary Prevention NAVIGATE

Transcription:

Subclinical AF: Implications of device based episodes Michael R Gold, MD, PhD Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC Disclosures: Clinical Trials and Consulting: Medtronic, Boston Scientific

Introduction Atrial Fibrillation is common in patients with pacemakers and ICDs (CIEDs) SSS is the most frequent indication for PPM in US with most having Afib ICD patients have LV dysfunction and CHF, two conditions with a high incidence of AF Devices also allow for the detection of AF, which is often asymptomatic. The prognostic importance and therapeutic implications of such episodes is not fully understood

Stroke Risk in Pacemaker Patients: By History of AF Hx. Of AF Healey JS Circulation 2006 No Hx of AF 5 years

What is Atrial Fibrillation?

Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Detected by Pacemakers Modern pacemakers can precisely document brief, asymptomatic AT

Stored Electrograms moment of AT detection Ventricular far-field oversensing memory data require confirmation by stored electrograms before any conclusions can be made!

Intermittent AF Undersensing AT onset criteria fulfilled high-degree AT undersensing Stored AF episode, duration only 25 s due to intermittent AF undersensing. True AF duration was >6 months (permanent).

Are all AHRE real? AWARE Trial (N=1642) Appropriate: 73% AF 42% Aflutter 27% Atrial Tachycardia 4% Inappropriate: 37% RNRVAS 17% Noise 5% Farfield R-wave oversensing 3% Sinus tachycardia 2%

Potential Clinical Impact of AHRE AT with EGM documentation AT with ECG documentation AT >48 h without symptoms or ECG documentation In 110 patients with a history of AT AT recurred during 19 mo FU in 46% (ECG) versus 88% (device) AT >24 h in 50 patients 19/50 patients with AT >24 h asymptomatic and in SR at FU Israel et al, JACC 2004;43:47-52

Monitored AF Embolic Risk Capucci et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1913

MOST Study Death or Stroke Glotzer et al Circulation 2003

Retrospective Composite Limitations of MOST No adjudication of EGMs One-third of patients with AHRE had previously documented Atrial Fibrillation

Prospective TRENDS Study n=2486, no adjudication of AHRE Variable Value Age 70.9 ± 11.1 yrs Male 66% (n=1650) CHADS 2 2.2 ± 1.2 CHF 60% (n=1479) Hypertension 76% (n=1887) Diabetes 32% (n=783) Prior Stroke/TIA 13 % (n=333) Systolic BP 133.3 ± 22.5 mmhg

Baseline Clinical Features Variable Value Pacemaker ICD CRT Warfarin Aspirin Documented AT/AF History 50% (n=1234) 31% (n=781) 19% (n=471) 21% (n=517) 62% (n=1547) 20% (n=498)

Results The median value for maximum daily burden in all 30-day windows with nonzero AT/AF was 5.5h All 30 day Windows (100%) Zero AT/AF Burden Windows (76%) Any AT/AF Burden Windows (24%) Low AT/AF Burden Windows: < Median Burden Value (12%) High AT/AF Burden Windows: Median Burden Value (12%) < 5.5h > 5.5h

TE Rate per 100 Patient-years TRENDS Prospective Registry (n=2486) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Zero AT Low AT (<5.5h) High AT (5.5 h) Glotzer et al. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:474-80.

ASymptomatic AF and Stroke Evaluation in Pacemaker Patients and the AF Reduction Atrial Pacing Trial

Patient Eligibility ASSERT Enrolled after new dual-chamber pacemaker Age 65 years History of hypertension Excluded if any history of AF Excluded if on Vitamin K antagonist Pre-specified primary analysis: Monitor from enrolment to 3 month visit for atrial tachyarrhythmia defined as >6 minutes and an atrial rate of >190 bpm Prospective follow up for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism from 3 month visit onwards Adjudication of all available AHRE

Study Design Prospective Cohort Design To determine if device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias are associated with an increased risk of stroke or embolism? Mininum Follow up Maxmum Follow Up Mean Follow Up 1.75 yrs 5 yrs 2.8 yrs Enrolled 0-8 wks post implant Arrhythmia Detection Follow Up Period Primary Outcome: Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism Visits -3 0 3 9 15 21 27 33 39 45 51 57 Months

NEJM 2012;366:120-9 ASSERT: Patient Baseline Characteristics Device-Detected Atrial Tachyarrhythmia before 3 Month Visit No N = 2319 Yes N = 261 P-Value Age (years) (mean ± SD) 76.3 ± 6.7 77.0 ± 6.8 0.13 Male 58.7% 54.9% 0.27 History of Prior Stroke 7.2% 6.9% 0.84 History of Heart Failure 14.4% 14.9% 0.83 History of Diabetes Mellitus 29.1% 22.6% 0.03 History of Myocardial Infarction 18.4% 12.3% 0.01 CHADS 2 score (mean ± SD) 2.26 ± 1.02 2.21 ± 1.11 0.47 Sinus Node Disease 42% 50% 0.01 Heart Rate 70.0 ± 11.6 67.7 ± 11.7 0.001 Systolic BP (mm Hg) 136.5 ± 20 137.2 ± 20 0.60 Baseline use of ASA 61.7% 61.3% 0.91 Baseline use of Clopidogrel 10.7% 9.6% 0.56

Cumulative Hazard Rates Time to First Device-Detected Atrial Tachyarrhythmia > 6 min, >190 bpm ASSERT : Time to Adjudicated AHRE(>6 minutes,>190/minute) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 # at Risk Year 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2580 2059 1842 1663 1371 1008 706 446 243 3 month Visit 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Years of Follow-up

Cumulative Hazard Rates Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 # at Risk Year 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 + _ 261 249 238 218 178 122 2319 2145 2070 1922 1556 1197 RR=2.49 95%CI 1.28-4.85 P=0.007 Device-Detected Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Detected 0-3 months No Asymptomatic Atrial Tachycardia Detected 0-3 months 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 T 0 at 3-month visit Years of Follow-up

Stroke Etiologies Hemorrhagic (15%) Ischemic (85%) Types of Ischemic Stroke Cryptogenic (25-40%) Atherothrombotic (25-30%) Cardioembolic (20%) Lacunar/Small Vessel (15-20%) Other/Uncommon (5-10%)

Association of AF and Stroke 5-fold in risk of stroke 1,2 Stroke severity (and mortality) is worse with AF than without AF 3 Incidence of all-cause stroke in patients with AF: 5% 1 Stroke risk persists even in asymptomatic AF 4 1. Fuster V, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(4):1231-1266. 2. Benjamin EJ, et al. Circulation. 1998;98(10):946-952. 3. Dulli DA, et al. Neuroepidemiology. 2003;22(2):118-123. 4. Page RL, et al. Circulation. 2003;107:1141-1145. 25

Should all Patients with stroke or TIA and known clinical AF or documented AF at the time of stroke be anticoagulated if possible? 26

Comparison of Stroke Risk Stratification Schemes Annual Stroke Rate (%) Risk Factor CHADS 2 CHA 2 DS 2 - VASc Renal Insuff (CrCl<60 ml/min) R 2 - CHADS 2 --- --- 2 CHF 1 1 1 Hypertension 1 1 1 Age >75 years 1 2 1 Diabetes 1 1 1 Stroke/TIA 2 2 2 Vascular Disease --- 1 --- Age >65-74 Years --- 1 --- Sex (Female) --- 1 --- Score CHADS 2 CHA 2 DS 2 - VASc R 2 - CHADS 2 0 1.9 0 0.4 1 2.8 1.3 1.3 2 4.0 2.2 2.2 3 5.9 3.2 2.6 4 8.5 4.0 3.6 5 12.5 6.7 5.3 6 18.2 9.8 5.9 7 9.6 2.8 8 6.7 7.4 Lip GY, Halperin JL. Am J Med 2010;123(6):84-488; Olesen JB, et al. Br Med J 2011;342:d124; Piccini JP, et al.circulartion 2013;127:224-232.

Should all Patients with Embolic or Cryptogenic strokes and no known AF (ESUS) be anticoagulated? 28

Comparison of Warfarin versus Aspirin for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke or Death: Subgroup Analyses from the Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;22:4 12 - DOI:10.1159/000092331 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

Comparison of Warfarin versus Aspirin for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke or Death: Subgroup Analyses from the Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;22:4 12 - DOI:10.1159/000092331 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

N Engl J Med, 2014

AF Burden (0 to 100%, log scale) Temporal Relationship of Atrial Fibrillation & Thromboembolism Months from TE -54-48 -42-36 -30-24 -18-12 -6 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54

ASSERT: Temporal Relationship Between AF and Stroke Of 51 pts experiencing S/SE during follow-up, 26 (51%) had SCAF. 18 pts (35%) had SCAF before S/SE. 4 pts (8%) had SCAF detected within 30 days before S/SE. 1 of these 4 patients experienced SCAF at the time of the stroke. 8 pts (16%) had SCAF detected only after their stroke, despite continuous monitoring for a median duration of 228 days before their event. Brambatti M, et al. Circulation 2014;129:2094

Cumulative event rates ASSERT: AF duration & stroke incidence longest single SCAF episode > 6 min 6 hours: 462 pts (18.8%) longest single SCAF episode > 6 hours 24 hours: 169 pts (6.9%) longest single SCAF episode > 24 hours: 262 pts (10.7%) 0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 No SCAF 6mins~6hrs 6hrs~24hrs >24hrs No. at Risk No SCAF 6mins~6hrs 6hrs~24hrs >24hrs 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Years of Follow-up 2455 1926 1708 1528 1251 900 624 390 0 226 302 347 322 281 218 155 0 88 104 103 108 93 80 52 0 91 124 144 140 126 116 85 Van Gelder I, et al. Europ Heart J 2017;doi:10.1093/eurhert/ehx042

ASSERT II = SCAF by ILR Age 65 a d O e of : -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 2 -Obstructive s eep ap ea -BMI >30 a d O e of : -Left atrial volume 58ml or LA diameter 4.4cm -Serum NT-ProBNP 290 pg/ml Hea ey et a #4

Incidence of SCAF Rate per year (95% CI) 34.4% (27.7% 42.3%) 21.8% (16.7% 27.8%) 7.1% (4.5% 10.6%) 2.7% (1.2% 5.0%) #7

Intermittent AF Screening

The STROKE-STOP Study Population-based Patients aged 75 and 76 No prior AF Screened with twice-daily, handheld ECG for 2 weeks 3% previously unrecognized AF 2% previously diagnosed but untreated AF

Patients with: - SCAF (at least 1 episode 6 min but none > 24 hrs) - CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score 3 Doubleblind, doubledummy design Active aspirin 81mg OD + Placebo apixaban bid CONSENT and RANDOMIZE Placebo aspirin OD + Active apixaban 5mg or 2.5mg* bid Follow-up Visits at 1 month and every 6 months until 248 primary efficacy outcomes (est. avg 3 yrs) Primary Efficacy Outcomes: Outcomes: Stroke (including TIA with imaging) Systemic Embolism Primary Safety Major Bleeding (ISTH) * 2.5 mg if either of the following: - At least 2 of 3 of: - Age 80 - Weight 65 kg - Serum Creatinine 133 µmol/l (1.5 mg/dl) - Ongoing need for inhibitor of both CYP3A4 and P- glycoprotein

Conclusions Clear association between SCAF and stroke in PPM and ICD patients Risk of stroke lower than for clinical AF but higher than no AF on monitor Very few strokes occur during or soon after an AF episode The risk of stroke increases with increased duration of AF Ongoing studies will help determine who should be anticoagulated