Supplementary Table 1: Summary of 33 Patients Treated with Abemaciclib in Dose Escalation

Similar documents
The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

To assess safety profiles: significant laboratory changes and adverse events (AEs).

Clinical Study Synopsis

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 31 July 2013

Title A Phase II study of oral LBH589 in adult patients with refractory cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma

Clinical Study Synopsis

Sponsor: Sanofi Drug substance(s): GZ316455

Verzenio (abemaciclib) NEW PRODUCT SLIDESHOW

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Docetaxel (Taxotere )

Online-Only Supplementary Materials

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance: SAR236553/REGN727 (alirocumab)

PHA Spring First Exam. 8 Aminoglycosides (5 points)

Drafting a Coverage Authorization Request Letter

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): SAR (iniparib)

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

PHA5128 Dose Optimization II Case Study 3 Spring 2013

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Clinical Development for Patients with Cancer

Novel EGFR TKI Theliatinib: An Open Label, Dose Escalation Phase I Clinical Trial

Supplementary Online Content

B. G. Redman University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. J. A. Thompson University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Participating Institutions Insitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France Institut Bergonie, Bourdeaux, France. Sponsor Epizyme, Inc

Clinical Activity Lung Cancer. Andrea Camerini Ospedale Versilia

Supplementary Material

Cabozantinib (Cometriq )

Supplementary Appendix

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Efficacy of larotrectinib in adolescents and young adults with TRK fusion cancer

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Tumors in the Randomized German AIO study KRK-0306

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Part A Part B Part C

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

ONT-380 and HER2+ Breast Cancer

Phase 1 Trial of ALN-VSP in Cancers Involving the Liver. Annual Meeting of the Controlled Release Society August 2, 2011

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Supplementary Online Content

ASCO Annual Meeting 2013, May 31 June , Chicago, IL

INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER

First-Line Ribociclib + Letrozole for Postmenopausal Women With HR+, HER2-, Advanced Breast Cancer: First Results From the Phase III MONALEESA-2 Study

INNOVAZIONI TERAPEUTICHE IN ONCOLOGIA MEDICA CAGLIARI GIUGNO 2005 Policlinico Universitario - Cagliari LAPATINIB

Pharmacology Updates in Breast Cancer Chris Vaklavas, M.D.

SYNOPSIS. Number of subjects: Planned: 22 Randomized: 23 Treated: 23. Evaluated: Pharmacodynamic: 22 Safety: 23 Pharmacokinetics: 22

Subjects from the Safety Population who had GSK PK parameter estimates from any portion of the study. Cohort 1 (N=8)

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

3. Pardanani A, et al. Leukemia 2009;23: Hedvat M, et al. Cancer Cell 2009;16:

Edith A. Perez, Ahmad Awada, Joyce O Shaughnessy, Hope Rugo, Chris Twelves, Seock-Ah Im, Carol Zhao, Ute Hoch, Alison L. Hannah, Javier Cortes

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

Phase I Study of Carfilzomib and Panobinostat for Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: A Multicenter MMRC Clinical Trial

First in class, first in human phase I trial of KPT-330, a Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) in patients with advanced solid tumors

STUDY OF TRC093 (HUMANIZED ANTI- CLEAVED COLLAGEN ANTIBODY) IN PATIENTS WITH SOLID CANCER

For more information, call AstraZeneca Access 360 at ASK-A360, Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM ET.

Clinical Study Synopsis

Study Centers: This study was conducted in 2 centers in Italy.

Study Period: 27 March 2008 (first subject enrolled) to 05 May 2010 (data cutoff date for primary analysis)

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer. Aurelio B. Castrellon Medical Oncology Memorial Healthcare System

Metastatic breast cancer: sequence of therapies

Principal Investigator: Robert J. Jones, MD, Beatson Cancer Center, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow; United Kingdom

NCCTG Status Report for Study N September 2007

Third Line and Beyond: Management of Refractory Colorectal Cancer

[ NASDAQ: MEIP ] Analyst & Investor Event December 8, 2014

Metronomic chemotherapy for breast cancer

Synopsis (C1034T02) CNTO 95 Module 5.3 Clinical Study Report C1034T02

A Phase I Trial of Vatalanib (PTK/ZK) in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With Refractory and/or Advanced Malignancies

GASTRIC & PANCREATIC CANCER

Results. Subject Disposition and Demographics Of 37 enrolled subjects, 23 (62.2%) completed the study

A Phase II Study on Efficacy, Safety and Intratumoral Pharmacokinetics of Oral Selinexor (KPT-330) in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma (GBM)

Study No: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): SAR302503

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

2019 ASCO-SITC. Nektar Therapeutics Investor & Analyst Call. March 1, 2019

Lipoplatin monotherapy for oncologists

HIGHLIGHTS ESMO 2017 SUPPORTIVE AND PALLIATIVE CARE

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

JUERGEN FROEHLICH, JANICE DAHMS, DAVID CIPOLLA,

Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine in Treatment-Naïve Patients Aged 65 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Eltanexor (KPT-8602), a Second Generation Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, in Patients with Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A randomized phase 2 trial of CRLX101 in combination with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) vs standard of care

Maintenance paradigm in non-squamous NSCLC

A PHASE 1 STUDY OF TRC105 (ANTI- ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS

The next wave of successful drug therapy strategies in HER2-positive breast cancer. Hans Wildiers University Hospitals Leuven Belgium

Clinical Research on PARP Inhibitors and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

ASCO Highlights Lung Cancer

Initial Results from an Open-label, Doseescalation Phase I Study of the Oral BRAF Inhibitor LGX818 in BRAF V600 mutant Advanced Melanoma

Nivolumab in Patients With DNA Mismatch Repair Deficient/Microsatellite Instability High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Update From CheckMate 142

ReDOS Trial Background

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

PBI-05204, an inhibitor of Akt, FGF-2, NF-κb and p70s6k

1 Introduction. Reza Khosravan 1 Robert J. Motzer

Irinotecan. Class:Camptothecin. Indications : _Cervical cancer. _CNS tumor. _Esophageal cancer. _Ewing s sarcoma. _Gastric cancer

Safety Findings From FORWARD II: A Phase Ib Study Evaluating the Folate Receptor Alpha (FR

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Study No Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Study Endpoints: Pharmacokinetics:

Transcription:

Supplementary Table 1: Summary of 33 Patients Treated with Abemaciclib in Dose Escalation Cohort Dose and Frequency Age and Sex Tumor Type Number of Cycles Best Overall Response 4M Colorectal cancer - Not Evaluable 1 50mg Q24H 4F Rectal cancer 2 Progressive Disease 2M Rectal cancer 2 Progressive Disease 53M Colorectal cancer 1 Progressive Disease 59F NSCLC Stable Disease 2 100mg Q24H 73M Colorectal cancer 2 Progressive Disease 9F Colorectal cancer 4 Stable Disease 8M NSCLC 4 Stable Disease 3 150mg Q24H 71F Ovarian cancer 2 Stable Disease 53F Endometrial cancer 2 Progressive Disease 8M Colorectal cancer 2 Stable Disease 4 225mg Q24H F Ovarian cancer 4 Stable Disease 47M Salivary ductal carcinoma 1 Stable Disease 5 75mg Q12H 100mg Q12H 7 150mg Q12H 8 200mg Q12H 9 275mg Q12H 5F Melanoma 3 Stable Disease 71F Ovarian cancer - Not Evaluable 0M Liposarcoma 2 Progressive Disease 58F Colorectal cancer 2 Progressive Disease 45F Chondrosarcoma 3 Stable Disease 2M Appendiceal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma 2 Progressive Disease 50M Colorectal cancer 2 Progressive Disease 1F Colorectal cancer 2 Progressive Disease 4F Ovarian cancer 2 Progressive Disease 7F Colorectal cancer 4 Stable Disease 57M Rectal Cancer 4 Stable Disease 59F Adenoid cystic carcinoma - Not Evaluable 3F Colorectal cancer 2 Stable Disease 8F Ovarian cancer 8 Stable Disease 5F Breast cancer 4 Stable Disease 51F Endometrial cancer 4 Stable Disease 5F Endometrial cancer 4 Stable Disease 52F Colorectal cancer 2 Progressive Disease F Breast cancer - Not Evaluable 44F Adenoid cystic carcinoma 2 Progressive Disease A best overall response of Stable Disease required at least weeks ( 39 days) between first dose of abemaciclib and radiographic disease assessment. Patients without a disease assessment at least weeks after enrollment and who had not already progressed were designated as Not Evaluable. Abbreviations: Q12H = every 12 hours, Q24H = every 24 hours, NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer 1

Supplementary Table 2: Baseline patient and disease characteristics Characteristic Age (range), years Dose escalation (n=33) Single-agent cohorts* (n=173) Breast cancer (n=47) NSCLC (n=8) Glioblastoma (n=17) Melanoma (n=2) Colorectal Breast cancer cancer combination cohort (n=15) (n=19) 0 (44 73) 1 (24 85) 55 (28 80) 5 (24 85) 53 (28 73) (39 82) 0 (38 80) 57 (39 80) Male 11 (33%) 4 (37%) 1 (2%) 32 (47%) 7 (41%) 18 (9%) (40%) 0 (0%) ECOG performance status 0 14 (42%) 0 (35%) 19 (40%) 13 (19%) (35%) 15 (58%) 7 (47%) 10 (53%) 1 19 (58%) 101 (58%) 27 (57%) 48 (71%) 7 (41%) 11 (42%) 8 (53%) 9 (47%) 2-12 (7%) 1 (2%) 7 (10%) 4 (24%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Number metastatic sites 1 9 (27%) 43 (25%) 8 (17%) 10 (15%) NA 5 (19%) 3 (20%) 5 (2%) 2 15 (45%) 45 (2%) 1 (34%) 17 (25%) NA 5(19%) 7 (47%) 10 (53%) 3 or more 9 (27%) 85 (49%) 23 (49%) 41 (0%) NA 1 (1%) 5 (33%) 4 (21%) Prior surgery 32 (97%) 122 (71%) 42 (89%) 25 (37%) 17 (100%) 24 (92%) 14 (93%) 18 (95%) Prior radiotherapy 12 (3%) 119 (9%) 42 (89%) 40 (59%) 17 (100%) 13 (50%) 7 (47%) 1 (84%) Prior systemic therapies 32 (97%) 17 (97%) 47 (100%) (97%) 17 (100%) 22 (85%) 15 (100%) 19 (100%) 3 regimens 14 (42%) 77 (45%) 11 (23%) 29 (43%) 14 (82%) 1 (2%) 7 (47%) 7 (37%) 4 regimens 18 (55%) 90 (52%) 3 (77%) 37 (54%) 3 (18%) (23%) 8 (53%) 12 (3%) Starting doses for abemaciclib in the tumor-specific cohorts: breast cancer cohort, 150 mg (n=25), 200 mg (n=22); NSCLC cohort, 150 mg (n=2), 200 mg (n=42); glioblastoma cohort, 150 mg (n=2), 200 mg (n=15); melanoma cohort, 150 mg (n=13), 200 mg (n=13); colorectal cancer cohort, 150 mg only (n=15), HR-positive breast cancer (abemaciclib + fulvestrant) combination cohort, 200 mg only (n=19). Data are represented as n (%) or median (range). *Includes all tumor-specific cohorts that received single-agent abemaciclib for breast cancer, NSCLC, glioblastoma, melanoma, or colorectal cancer. Glioblastoma is a primary brain tumor Abbreviations: ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, HR = hormone receptor, n = number of patients, NA = not applicable; NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer. 2

Supplementary Table 3: Possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events (>10% all grades) for hormone receptorpositive breast cancer cohort (n=19) receiving combination therapy with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant TEAE Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 All grades * Diarrhea 7 (37%) 7 (37%) 1 (5%) 0 15 (79%) Fatigue 7 (37%) 5 (2%) 1 (5%) 0 13 (8%) Nausea (32%) (32%) 0 0 12 (3%) Neutropenia 0 2 (11%) (32%) 0 8 (42%) Vomiting 4 (21%) 3 (1%) 1 (5%) 0 8 (42%) Anorexia 3 (1%) 3 (1%) 0 0 (32%) Leukopenia 0 1 (5%) 5 (2%) 0 (32%) Abdominal pain 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 0 4 (21%) Dehydration 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 0 0 3 (1%) Hypokalemia 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 0 0 3 (1%) Watering eyes 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 0 0 3 (1%) Anemia 0 0 2 (11%) 0 2 (11%) Constipation 2 (11%) 0 0 0 2 (11%) Creatinine increased 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 0 0 2 (11%) Dyspepsia 0 2 (11%) 0 0 2 (11%) Thrombocytopenia 2 (11%) 0 0 0 2 (11%) Data are represented as n (%). * No grade 5 events reported. Abemaciclib inhibits renal transporters that mediate tubular secretion of creatinine, so serum creatinine may not accurately reflect renal function in patients receiving abemaciclib. Abbreviations: n = number of patients, TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event 3

Supplementary Table 4: Summary of abemaciclib pharmacokinetic parameters following a single oral administration Geometric mean* (% CV) C max (ng/ml) t max AUC 0-tlast AUC 0- CL/F (L/h) V ss /F (L) t 1/2 50 mg (n=4) 39. (54) 3.99 (2.12 4.35) 100 (8) 1270 (88) 39.5 (88) 140 (38) 25.8 (17. 44.1) 75 mg 41.9 (21) 4 (2 4) 878 (4) 943 (4) 79.5 (4) 2220 (2) 17.4 (15.9 18.5) 100 mg (n=7) 8.8 (117) (4 10) 190 (95) 1880 (9) 53.3 (9) 10 (99) 20.8 (11.5 29.0) Abemaciclib dose 150 mg 200 mg (n=85) (n=117) 114 158 (83) (92).02 (2 70.53) (1.98 72.45) 3420 400 (82) (9) 4010 5220 (80) (105) 37.4 38.3 (80) (105) 1310 1300 (73) (9) 22.8 21.3 (8.9 0.8) (11. 3.0) 225 mg 49.1 (0) ( ) 1820 (39) 2700 (17) 83.4 (17) 4930 (84) 38.1 (15.5 2.7) 275 mg 24 (75) ( 7.92) 240 (39) 7890 (5) 34.9 (5) 130 (93) 25.0 (12.4 3.9) *Individual values are reported when patient numbers <3. Median (range). Geometric mean (range). Abbreviations: AUC 0-tlast = area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of last quantifiable plasma concentration, AUC 0- = area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, CL/F = oral clearance, C max = maximum observed plasma concentration, CV = coefficient of variation, n = number of patients, t 1/2 = terminal elimination halflife, t max = time to maximum observed plasma concentration, V ss /F = oral volume of distribution at steady state. 4

Supplementary Table 5: Summary of abemaciclib pharmacokinetic parameters following repeated once-daily (Q24H) or twice-daily (Q12H) oral administration Geometric mean* (% CV) Tau C min,ss (ng/ml) C max,ss (ng/ml) t max,ss AUC 0-τ,ss AUC 0-24h,ss 50 mg (n=2) 100 mg Q24H 150 mg 225 mg Abemaciclib dose 75 mg 100 mg (n=8) Q12H 150 mg (n=72) 24 24 24 24 12 12 12 12 200 mg (n=52) 5.34, * 125 48.7 (18) 134 (47) 54.7 (27) 34.0 (57) 144 (1) 19 (95) 197 (82) 28., * 254 102 (198) 189 (35) 121 (38) 58.7 (37) 22 (51) 249 (8) 298 (72) 1.7, * 4.3 4.25 (4 4.33) ( ) (4 8) 4.07 (0 8) 4 (2.03) 3.95(0 10.15) 4 (0 10) 334, * 4557 1840 (172) 3448, * 512 314, * 157 54 (43) 2250 (54) 2390 (90) 3000 (9) 334, * 4557 1840 (172) 3448, * 512 314, * 157 1300 (49) 3910 (53) 4280 (94) 5520 (70) R AUC 0.7, * 7.80 2.4 (2) 1.8, * 5.82 5.1, * 0.981 1.85 (4) 3.01 (99) 2.3 (58) 2.53 (7) R Cmax 1.04, * 7.3 2.14 (43) 3.5 (8) 2.4 (107) 1.4 (2) 2.43 (94) 2.18 (58) 1.87 (58) L 0.49, * 3. 1.23 (20) 0.89, * 2.98 1.43, * 0.55 0.579 (34) 0.979 (90) 0.39 (54) 0.578 (4) *Individual values are reported when patient numbers <3. Median (range). Geometric mean and CV are based on patient numbers <N. Abbreviations: AUC 0-τ,ss = area under the steady state plasma concentration-time curve over a dosing interval, AUC 0-24hr,ss = area under the steady state plasma concentration-time curve over 24 h, C min,ss = minimum observed plasma concentration at steady state, C max,ss = maximum observed plasma concentration at steady state, CV = coefficient of variation, L = linearity index, n = number of patients, Q24H = every 24 h (once daily), Q12H = every 12 h (twice daily), t max,ss = time to maximum observed plasma concentration at steady state, R AUC = accumulation ratio for AUC, R Cmax = accumulation ratio for C max. 5

Supplementary Table : Efficacy for NSCLC cohort, overall and by KRAS status Endpoint NSCLC overall * (n=8) KRAS-mutated (n=29) KRAS-wild-type (n=33) Best overall response Complete response (CR) 0 0 0 Partial response (PR) 2 (3%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) Stable disease (SD) 31 (4%) 15 (52%) 12 (3%) 24 weeks 15 (22%) 9 (31%) 4 (12%) <24 weeks 1 (24%) (21%) 8 (24%) Progressive disease 1 (24%) 7 (24%) 9 (27%) Not evaluable 19 (28%) (21%) 11 (33%) Response rate (CR+PR) (95% CI) 3% (0.4 10.2) 3% (0.1 17.8) 3% (0.1 15.8) Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) 49% (3.2 1.0) 55% (35.7 73.) 39% (22.9 57.9) (95% CI) Median duration of overall 7.5, 7.4 (2 patients) 7.4 (1 patient) 7.5 (1 patient) response, months Median progression-free survival (95% CI), months 2.0 (1.8 3.7) 2.8 (1.8 5.) 1.9 (1.4 3.7) Data are represented as n (%), unless otherwise specified. * patients had unknown KRAS status. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, CR = complete response, Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS); n = number of patients, NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer, PR = partial response, SD = stable disease,.

Supplementary Table 7: Efficacy for other tumor-specific cohorts * Endpoint Glioblastoma (n=17) Colorectal cancer (n=15) Melanoma (n=2) Best overall response Complete response (CR) 0 0 0 Partial response (PR) 0 0 1 (4%) Stable disease (SD) 3 (18%) 2 (13%) (23%) Progressive disease 13 (7%) 10 (7%) 11 (42%) Not evaluable 1 (%) 3 (20%) 8 (31%) Response rate (CR+PR) ( 95% CI) 0% 0% 4% (0.1 19.) Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) (95% CI) 18% (3.8 43.4) 13% (1.7 40.5) 27% (11. 47.8) Median duration of overall response (95% CI), months -- -- 5.5 (NA NA) Median progression-free survival (95% CI), months 1.1 (1.0 1.9) 1.9 (1.7 1.9) 2.0 (1.8 3.7) Data are represented as n (%), unless otherwise specified. * Includes tumor-specific cohorts for glioblastoma, colorectal cancer, and melanoma receiving single-agent abemaciclib. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, CR = complete response, n = number of patients, NA = not applicable, PR = partial response, SD = stable disease. 7