Hearing Schedule. Decision-making Committee. Sequence of Events. Dr John Taylor (Chair) Dr Kerry Laing Dr Ngaire Phillips

Similar documents
Preparing for an Oral Hearing: Taxi, Limousine or other PDV Applications

1. Procedure for Academic Misconduct Committees, virtual panels and formal hearings

General Terms and Conditions

Auckland Unitary Plan Hearing Procedures. Version November 2015

Good Practice Notes on School Admission Appeals

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines

What if someone complains about me? A guide to the complaint process

Rules of Procedure for Screening and Hearing Meetings

GOC Guidance for Witnesses in Fitness to Practise Committee Hearings

METROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE

Induction appeals procedure

Teacher misconduct - Information for witnesses

When replying please quote document no: Application ID: DSN17/44711; LUC18/47193

Gisborne District Council Alcohol Control Bylaw 2015

A guide to GDC investigations and fitness to practise proceedings

General Terms and Conditions

Guidance for Witnesses

NFA Arbitrators. Chairperson s Handbook

The Clean Environment Commission. Public Participation in the Environmental Review Process

SECTION 504 NOTICE OF PARENT/STUDENT RIGHTS IN IDENTIFICATION/EVALUATION, AND PLACEMENT

Schools Hearings & Appeals Procedure

Section 32: BIMM Institute Student Disciplinary Procedure

COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Officer-Involved Shooting Investigation. Things to think about ahead of time

GOC GUIDANCE FOR WITNESSES IN FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE HEARINGS

Fitness to Practise Committee Rules and Practice Direction Revised September 2012

15 March 2012 Millbank Tower, Millbank, London SW1P 4QP

Here4me Action for Children PROTOCOL FOR THE PROVISION OF ADVOCACY for West Berkshire

Overview. You can find the regulations and more details on the LJMU website, here

Hi Neighbours: A few notes to pass along that are time sensitive:

SECTION III GUIDELINES FOR SUBSIDIARY BODIES. SECTION III: Guidelines for Subsidiary Bodies

Carers Forums in Cornwall. Minutes of the meeting held at Penzance on 30 th May 2013 in The Board Room at the One Stop Shop, St Clare, Penzance

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

Committee of Senior Representatives Tenth Meeting Oslo, Norway 11 December 2006

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPPLY OF NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY

Information about cases being considered by the Case Examiners

4. The time limit, not less than thirty (30) calendar days, for requesting a Hearing in writing.

Building better children s services: Concerns and complaints about childcare providers

Setting up a Mental Health Support Group

Information about Age UK Manchester s Information & Advice Service

Vintage and Nonconforming Amendments to Salt Lake City s Sign Ordinance

2. The Screening Officer may extend the time to request a review of the Administrative Penalty under extenuating circumstances.

Professional Development: proposals for assuring the continuing fitness to practise of osteopaths. draft Peer Discussion Review Guidelines

Frequently Asked Questions

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

Example documents to help you:

GRIEVENCE PROCEDURES INFORMAL REVIEWS AND HEARINGS

NOAC 2018 Ceremonial Recognition Program Guidelines

Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention--Exploring a Strategy for

COMPLAINTS & SUGGESTIONS FORM & GUIDELINES

IAPP KnowledgeNet Chapter Chair Manual 2018

MS Society Safeguarding Adults Policy and Procedure (Scotland)

Translation and Interpretation Policy

Panel Hearing Script Office of Student Conduct TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY

How to Conduct a Public Hearing

29 th Judicial District Language Access Plan

PLEASE COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RULES OF PROCEDURE

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Complaints Procedure

Graduate Student Academic Grievance Hearing Procedures. For the College of Education

The Courageous Leadership Conference

Information about Volunteering for MANCHESTER CARE & REPAIR

Regulation of the Chancellor

IPC Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations

National curriculum tests maladministration procedures. March 2007 QCA/07/3097

Ofsted s regulation and inspection of providers on the Early Years Register from September 2012: common questions and answers

Manager. Murray Holt, Head of Operational Support

IACAPAP 2018 Abstracts Submission Guidelines

Supervisor Handbook for the Diploma of Diagnostic Ultrasound (DDU)

University of Pennsylvania College Houses & Academic Services Graduate Associate Position Description and Contract

Purpose: Policy: The Fair Hearing Plan is not applicable to mid-level providers. Grounds for a Hearing

WOKING BOROUGH COUNCIL CORE STRATEGY DPD EXAMINATION NOTES OF PRE-HEARING MEETING (PHM) HELD 9 th February

Claims about health in ads for e-cigarettes. CAP and BCAP s regulatory statement

Developed by Marion Wood and Children s Dental Needs Steering Group

The New Neighborhood Block Club Manual for Constituents and Organizers. A Guide Book written and prepared by Dan Kleinman Second Edition January 2016

Z E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy

Robert E. Kennedy Library, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA (805) Bylaws. Article I: Committees

FORENSIC HYPNOSIS WITH THE DEAF AND HEARING IMPAIRED

Long-Term Suspensions and Procedural Due Process

This paper contains analysis of the results of these processes and sets out the programme of future development.

What s my story? A guide to using intermediaries to help vulnerable witnesses

Information for Service Providers

Carers Forums in Cornwall

University of Denver Disability Services Program: Policies and Procedures Interpreting/CART/VRI Services for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students

PUBLIC HOUSING: THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

HOW TO LodgE a complaint against a

SENCO good practice news Winter 2012

Minutes of Council meeting held on Thursday, 27 April 2017 in Youth Action.

How Ofsted regulate childcare

Medical gap arrangements - practitioner application

Minnesota Administrative Uniformity Committee (AUC) Mission Statement, History and Governing Principles. June 2014

OUTPATIENT SERVICES PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES CONTRACT

Review of National Disability Insurance Scheme Decisions Practice Direction

Teacher s use of inappropriate force against a student results in censure and conditions on her registration.

Could you help people with mental health challenges learn about staying well?

DIOXIN SYMPOSIUM MEETING PLANNING

Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management Te Ral<au Whal<amarumaru

Transcription:

Hearing Schedule APP202804- EDN (Ethanedinitrile) Note: These arrangements are provisional, based on the intentions of the parties to appear as advised to the EPA, and hence are subject to amendment if those intentions change, and are subject to the directions of the Chair. Application code: Application category: Applicant: Applicant contact: Purpose: Date application received: Hearing date: Time: Venue: Contact for Hearing: APP202804 Hazardous Substances, Notified, Category C application Lucebni Zavody Draslovka a.s. Kolin Helen Gear To import EDN, a fumigant for use on timber/logs under commercial conditions 17/07/2017 12:00 a.m. Tuesday 28 and Wednesday 29 August 2018 - Rotorua 10.30am 4.25pm approx., 28 th and 9.30am 11.45am approx, 29th Rydges Rotorua, 272 Fenton Street, Rotorua Marree Quinn, Applications Administrator, Hazardous Substances, Environmental Protection Authority, Wellington DDI: 04 474 5472 Decision-making Committee Dr John Taylor (Chair) Dr Kerry Laing Dr Ngaire Phillips Sequence of Events 1. Mihi by EPA representative 2. Introduction and explanation from the Chair 3. Order of business and procedures Applicant presents application EPA staff present the Staff assessment Submitter presents submission and any witnesses Final questions from the Committee Adjournment of hearing

2 The above is a guide only and the conduct of the hearing will be at the Chair s discretion and in accordance with the guidelines provided Submissions Submitters have been allocated a maximum of 15 minutes (including questions) unless they have previously requested additional time to speak to their submissions. The order of appearance is detailed over the page. Presentation of Evidence and Information Pre-circulated evidence (including submissions) will be taken as read by all parties and does not need to be read verbatim at the hearing. Presenters should use the limited time available to highlight key points, and remember to allow time for questions of clarification and explanation. Witnesses may refer to published material authored by others as part of their evidence. Sources of such material should be clearly identified. Witnesses presenting such information are expected to be able to justify their use of such information and to be questioned on their analysis and conclusions relating to such information. Where information is presented at a hearing that has not been disclosed to the EPA or to the other parties, the Chair may adjourn the hearing to allow other parties, including staff of the EPA, to assess and respond to the new information. There will be no cross-examination of parties or their witnesses at the hearing. At the conclusion of each person s evidence, the Chair and members of the Decision Making Committee may ask questions of that person. The Chair will then invite any other party to put questions of clarification or explanation to the witness. Such questions may be put only with the leave of the Chair who has the discretion to disallow any question. Final Decision At the end of all the presentations the Committee will adjourn the hearing and will make its decision in private. A final decision will be made usually within 30 working days but may be longer if further information is sought by the Committee. You will be notified of the decision and it will also be available on the EPA website at www.epa.govt.nz. News Media Guidelines The EPA has a media policy for hearings, available on request or on the website. The EPA is a semi judicial body and therefore Committee members do not comment on applications. General enquiries about the application process can be directed to Mark Wardle. Please contact Mark (Senior Advisor, Communications) on (04) 474 5501. Copies of relevant papers will be available from the EPA beforehand, or at the hearing. No cameras (still or video) or tape recordings are permitted after proceedings are formally under way. EPA staff can assist to set up for scene setting shots at the start or during the break.

3 Contact details If you need to contact someone at the hearing please text the administrator on 021 116 4975. Hearing Venue Rydges Rotorua 272 Fenton Street Rotorua Housekeeping Details Coffee and tea making facilities will be available. Parties are responsible for their own food arrangements Cell phones should be turned off No food will be permitted in the hearing room No filming or photos of proceedings to be taken Please refer to the map for directions to the venue.

4 Order of Business Please note that these are approximate session times and are dependent on the length of questioning by the Committee and the appearance of submitters at the hearing. APP202804 Hearing Schedule Rotorua, Tuesday 28 August 2018 10.30am 10.45am Mihi Julian Jackson, EPA representative 10.45am 11.00am Introduction and explanation Record of appearances Dr John Taylor, Chair, Decision Making Committee 11.00am 12.30pm Applicant presentation Helen Gear, Lucebni Zavody Draslovka a.s. Kolin Lunch Break, 12.30pm 1.30pm 1.30pm 2.00pm EPA Staff assessment presentation Dr Teresa Vaughan, HS Senior Advisor, EPA 2.00pm 2.30pm WorkSafe Susan Collier and Philippa Gibson WorkSafe (30 mins) Presentations by Submitter 2.30pm 2.45pm Submission 126960 2.45pm 3.00pm Submission 126970 3.00pm 3.15pm Submission 126980 Steffan Browning Tauranga Moana Fumigant Action Group John Armstrong Quarantine Scientific Ltd Sam Weiss and Eddie Grogan Bay of Plenty Regional Council 10 min break if required 3.25pm 3.55pm Final questions Decision Making Committee 3.55pm 4.25pm Applicant s response to matters raised (if necessary) Helen Gear, Lucebni Zavody Draslovka a.s. Kolin Hearing adjourns until 9.30am Wednesday 29 August 2018 Rotorua, Wednesday 29 August 2018 9.30am 9.45am Mihi Julian Jackson, EPA representative 9.45am 10.00am Introduction and explanation Record of appearances Dr John Taylor, Chair, Decision Making Committee

5 Presentations by Submitter 10.00am 10.15am Submission 126963 10.15am 10.30am Submission 126964 10.30am 10.45am Submission 126950 Mark Procter TPT Forests Limited Don Hammond (chairperson) Hammond Resource Management Ltd Glen Mackie and Russell Dale New Zealand Forest Owners Association 10.45am 11.15am Final questions Decision Making Committee 11.15am 11.45am 11.45am approx. Applicant s response to matters raised (if necessary) Hearing stands adjourned for consideration Helen Gear, Lucebni Zavody Draslovka a.s. Kolin Advice to Participants (Applicants and Submitters) in Hearings Hearings are an opportunity for the Authority to be fully informed on an application, and for the parties to put before the Authority information which is relevant to the application under consideration. The emphasis should be on the effects, risks, costs and benefits of the application in the context of the statutory framework of the HSNO Act. To help ensure that this is the case the following guidelines apply. These guidelines apply to both applicants and submitters. 1. Submissions and presentations at hearings (by applicants and submitters) should raise issues which are relevant to the application and are not simply of a general character. 2. Issues of a general nature previously dealt with by the Authority in decisions should only be raised in submissions if these contain new information, which helps to further develop the treatment of the issues relevant to this application. 3. Your presentation should focus on the key points raised in your submission. 4. Applicants and submitters are entitled to bring witnesses who will speak to their submission. Witnesses should be able to bring expertise or special knowledge to bear on the matters raised in the submission. 5. At least two weeks prior to the hearing, both the applicant and submitters should provide a written list of the witnesses they propose to call, their areas of expertise, and the elements of the

6 submission or application they propose to talk to. If this information is not provided the witness may only be called at the express leave of the Chair of the hearing. 6. Applicants, submitters and their witnesses are expected to pre-circulate to the Authority and to all other parties attending the hearing, copies of any information they intend to present to the hearing, at least 7 working days prior to the hearing. Parties should work on the basis that members of the Committee will have read the application, submissions and other circulated information prior to the hearing. It is therefore not necessary to read this information verbatim at the hearing. Parties should instead use their allotted time at the hearing to highlight their key points and be prepared to answer any questions which the Committee may have. 7. Applicants, submitters and their witnesses will normally have a maximum of 15 minutes to make their presentation to the hearing. This time includes provision for questions of clarification by members or by other parties. If any party believes they have good reason why they should have a longer time to make their presentation, this should be submitted in writing to the EPA at least 9 working days prior to the hearing. Any such extensions will be at the discretion of the Chair. Note: The Chair has discretion to vary these procedural guidelines if special circumstances apply. For example, if there are a large number of submitters making very similar submissions e.g. copied from a pro forma on a website, and they all wish to appear at the hearing, the Chair may set an overall guide on the time for that group of submissions. 8. There will be limitations on questioning of submitters by the applicant or by other submitters. Questions must be questions of clarification and must be asked through the Chair of the hearing. The applicant has the opportunity to follow submitters with its response to issues raised. Other than this, responses, which are not genuine questions of clarification, will not be permitted. 9. Persons may present information to the hearing in Māori. Those who wish to do so should contact the EPA at least two weeks in advance so that arrangements can be made for a translator.