Phase 1 Study of ARRY-520 and Carfilzomib in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Similar documents
Phase I/II Trial of the Combination of Lenalidomide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car- Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car- Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Pomalidomide (CC4047) Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone as Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. Lacy MQ et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(30):

Phase I Study of Carfilzomib and Panobinostat for Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: A Multicenter MMRC Clinical Trial

MSN, ANP-BC, AOCNP1*, R.

Future Strategies For Refractory Myeloma. Marc S. Raab

CME Information LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) refractory multiple myeloma is associated with inferior patient outcomes

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 2. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; 3

Multiple Myeloma Brian Berryman, M.D. March 8 th, 2014

Multiple Myeloma Updates 2007

A Phase 1 Trial of Lenalidomide (REVLIMID ) With Bortezomib (VELCADE ) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Indolent and Mantle-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Myeloma update ASH 2014

Regimen Protocols IRD or RID: Ixazomib citrate/lenalidomide/dexamethasone

To Maintain or Not to Maintain? Immunomodulators vs PIs Yes: Proteasome Inhibitors

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

Study Rationale. Reference: Chanan-Khan, A., et al., ASH 2010, Abstract#1962. Reference: Whiteman, K., et al, AACR, 2009, Abstract#2799

University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; 8 Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 9

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco & Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Novel Combination Therapies for Untreated Multiple Myeloma

Disclosures. Membership of Advisory Committees: Research Support/ PI: Celgene Corporation Millennium Pharmaceuticals Johnson & Johnson

ASCO Analyst & Investor Webcast. June 1, 2018

Disclosures for Palumbo Antonio, MD

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; 11 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Eltanexor (KPT-8602), a Second Generation Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, in Patients with Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

TREATING RELAPSED / REFRACTORY MYELOMA AT THE LEADING EDGE

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

Progress in Multiple Myeloma

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; 3

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 2 Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; 3

Kalyan Nadiminti, MBBS 4/13/18

Role of Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: The Changing Landscape

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

How to Integrate the New Drugs into the Management of Multiple Myeloma

IMiDs (Immunomodulatory drugs) and Multiple Myeloma

ClaPD (Clarithromycin/[Biaxin ], Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Carfilzomib: a novel agent for multiple myeloma

Highlights from EHA Mieloma Multiplo

Long-term ixazomib maintenance is tolerable and improves depth of response following ixazomiblenalidomide-dexamethasone

BR is an established treatment regimen for CLL in the front-line and R/R settings

The TOURMALINE-MM1 study: results and expert insights

Oncology Highlights ASCO 2011 MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Consensus or Controversy? Investigator Perspectives on Practical Issues and Research Questions in Multiple Myeloma

Disclosure. Study was sponsored by Karyopharm Therapeutics No financial relationships to disclose Other disclosures:

Disclosures. Consultancy, Research Funding and Speakers Bureau: Celgene Corporation, Millennium, Onyx, Cephalon

Initial Therapy For Transplant-Eligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma. Michele Cavo, MD University of Bologna Bologna, Italy

CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT

Idelalisib in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Curing Myeloma So Close and Yet So Far! Luciano J. Costa, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham

Personalizing Myeloma Treatment Drugs and Strategies

Tolerability and activity of chemo-free triplet combination of umbralisib (TGR-1202), ublituximab, and ibrutinib in patients with advanced CLL and NHL

Highlights in multiple myeloma

At Fox Chase Cancer Centre during study participation

Methods: Studies included in the analysis

Managing Major Adverse Events in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma: ASH 2008


Novel Treatment Advances and Approaches in Management of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Combining carfilzomib and panobinostat to treat relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results of a Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium Phase I Study

Christine Chen Princess Margaret Cancer Centre September 2013

Bendamustine is Effective Therapy in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Michel Delforge Belgium. New treatment options for multiple myeloma

POMALYST (pomalidomide) for Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

COMy Congress The case for IMids. Xavier Leleu. Hôpital la Milétrie, PRC, CHU, Poitiers, France

Expert perspectives real-world clinical experiences in relapsed myeloma

Updates in T cell Lymphoma

State of the Art Treatment for Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

ANCO: ASCO Highlights 2018 Hematologic Malignancies

Practical Considerations in Multiple Myeloma: Optimizing Therapy With New Proteasome Inhibitors

NASDAQ: TGTX. 33 rd Annual JP Morgan Healthcare Conference

City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA; 11 Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 1

Strategies for the Treatment of Elderly DLBCL Patients, New Combination Therapy in NHL, and Maintenance Rituximab Therapy in FL

Abstract. Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 2 Hospital-12-de-Octubre, Madrid, Spain; 3

Multiple Myeloma: Induction, Consolidation and Maintenance Therapy

Standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not eligible for a transplant

Management of Multiple Myeloma: The Changing Paradigm

Debate: Is transplant a necessity or a choice? Focus on the necessity for CR and MRD. Answer: NO

BC Cancer Protocol Summary for the Maintenance Therapy of Multiple Myeloma Using Bortezomib for Patients with the High-Risk Chromosome Abnormality

Ninlaro. (ixazomib) New Product Slideshow

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Docetaxel (Taxotere )

Consolidation and maintenance therapy for transplant eligible myeloma patients

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS WITH YONDELIS (trabectedin)

Unmet Medical Needs and Latest Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Treatment of elderly multiple myeloma patients

Role of Maintenance and Consolidation Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Patient-centered Approach

Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to treat multiple myeloma (MM)

Refractory M ultiple Multiple M yeloma Myeloma

Living Well with Myeloma Teleconference Series Thursday, March 24 th :00 PM Pacific/5:00 PM Mountain 6:00 PM Central/7:00 PM Eastern

Novel treatment options for Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Is autologous stem cell transplant the best consolidation after initial therapy?

Disclosures WOJCIECH JURCZAK

Maintenance therapy after autologous transplantation

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Carfilzomib (Kyprolis) for Multiple Myeloma March 30, 2017

New Drugs for Myeloma. Key Words. Bortezomib Lenalidomide Multiple myeloma Thalidomide

Transcription:

Phase 1 Study of ARRY-520 and Carfilzomib in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Jatin J Shah, MD, Sheeba Thomas, MD, Donna Weber, MD, Michael Wang, MD, Raymond Alexanian, MD, Robert Z. Orlowski, MD, PhD M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma Houston, TX

Disclosures Research Funding: Onyx, Celgene, Novartis, Array BioPharma, Millennium Speaking: None Advisory Board: Onyx, Celgene, Array

Background: Targeting Kinesin Spindle Protein Inhibition with ARRY-520 Kinesin spindle protein (KSP) is a microtubule motor protein required for mitosis and spindle pole separation KSP inhibition prevents formation of bipolar spindle, rapid apoptosis leading to cell death ARRY-520 is a highly selective allosteric KSP inhibitor Novel mechanism of action (MOA) for MM Not expected to be crossresistant with other drugs Preferentially acts on MCL-1 dependent cells

Background: Preclinical Rationale ARRY-520 + Proteasome Inhibitor ARRY-520 is highly active in vivo in preclinical MM models tumor volume, mm 3 2000 1600 1200 800 KAS-6 vehicle BTZ ARRY-520 ARRY-520 + BTZ Additive/synergistic with bortezomib (BTZ) 400 ARRY-520 BTZ 20 40 60 80 100 days after initiation of treatment Supports the rationale for the combination of a proteasome inhibitor and ARRY-520 tumor volume, mm 3 1200 1000 800 600 400 RPMI-8226 vehicle BTZ ARRY-520 ARRY-520 + BTZ 200 0 ARRY-520 BTZ 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 days after initiation of treatment

Background: ARRY-520 and Carfilzomib Carfilzomib is a selective proteasome inhibitor with demonstrated single-agent activity in RRMM and recently received accelerated approval by the US FDA Carfilzomib is very well tolerated with a well described side effect and safety profile Can be combined safely with multiple other agents ARRY-520 also has single-agent activity with a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 19%; in combination with dexamethasone in triple refractory MM CBR of 33% ARRY-520 is well tolerated with a differentiated adverse event (AE) profile from proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) No treatment-emergent neuropathy Minimal non-hematological toxicity

Background: Rationale Preclinical data demonstrating synergy support the rationale for the combination of carfilzomib + ARRY-520 Clinically minimal overlapping non hematologic toxicity of carfilzomib and ARRY-520 supporting the feasibility of the combination We hypothesize that the combination will be well tolerated and will yield improved response rates The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination and evaluate preliminary activity

Objective Primary Objective To determine the safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ARRY-520 when combined with carfilzomib Secondary Objective To obtain preliminary estimates of the efficacy of ARRY-520 when combined with carfilzomib Secondary Endpoints Overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) Time to progression (TTP) Progression free survival (PFS) Time to best response Safety of the combination in patients with RRMM Time to next therapy

Study Design Part A, Phase I: Standard 3 + 3 design with fixed dose of carfilzomib, escalating doses of ARRY-520 Dose Level ARRY-520 mg/m 2 /day IV Days 1, 2, 15 and 16 Carfilzomib mg/m 2 /day IV Days 1,2 8,9 and 15,16 Dexamethasone mg/day PO/IV Days 1, 2, 8, 9 and 15, 16 1 0.5 20/27 4 1 Starting Dose 0.75 20/27 4 2 1.00 20/27 4 3 1.25 20/27 4 4 1.5 20/27 4

Dosing Schema Induction Therapy Cycle 1 8: 28-day cycle Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone 4 mg (IV/PO) 1 2 8 9 15 16 ARRY-520 (IV) 1 2 15 16 Neupogen Days 3 7 and 17 21 Maintenance Therapy: >8 cycles Carfilzomib: Days 1, 2, 15, 16 and ARRY-520 Patients treated until progressive disease

Study Design: Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma Prior treatment must have included at least one full cycle of a proteasome inhibitor and at least one full cycle of an IMiD Patients must be refractory or intolerant to bortezomib therapy Adequate cardiac, pulmonary and renal function Adequate hematology laboratory values Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 1.5 10 9 /L Platelets 75 10 9 /L Measureable disease Exclusion Criteria: Patients who are eligible for autologous transplantation

Patient Demographics N=18 Age, median (range) 60 (47 80) Male 13 Prior Lines of Therapy, median (range) 4 (2 10) ISS Stage Stage I 6 Stage II 6 Stage III 2 Stage n/a 4 Cytogenetics Del 13 3 Del 17 2 t(14;16) 1 1 patient unevaluable, non-compliant.

Prior Therapies N=18 Prior Regimens, median (range) 4 (2 10) Prior ASCT, n (%) 16 (89) Prior Bortezomib, n (%) 18 (100) Bortezomib Refractory/Intolerant, n (%) 18 (100) Prior Lenalidomide, n (%) 18 (100) Refractory/intolerant, n (%) 15 (83) Carfilzomib 1 ARRY-520 5 ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation.

Phase I: Dose Escalation 18 patients enrolled (16 dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] evaluable): carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m 2 and escalating dose of ARRY-520 Patients DLT Cohort 1: ARRY-520 0.75 mg/m 2 /day 3 0 Cohort 2: ARRY-520 1.0 mg/m 2 /day 6 1 Cohort 3: ARRY-520 1.25 mg/m 2 /day 3 0 Cohort 4: ARRY-520 1.5 mg/m 2 /day 4 (ongoing) 1 DLT in cohort 2: 1 patient hospitalized with non-neutropenic fever admitted with parainfluenza 3 at end of Cycle 1 DLT in cohort 4: 1 patient hospitalized with non-neutropenic low grade temperature (38.0) and pneumonia (who has a history of recurrent infections) Serious AE: febrile neutropenia/death (n=1); lethargy grade 2 (due to disease) (n=1); lung infection/pna (n=4); community acquired MSSA bacteremia (n=1)

Hematologic Abnormalities (N=18) Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Anemia 6 7 5 0 Thrombocytopenia 6 4 3 3 Neutropenia 3 4 3 5 One patient with febrile neutropenia Toxicities were transient and reversible No cumulative toxicity

Non-Hematologic Adverse Events (N=18) Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 ALT increased 6 0 1 0 AST increased 8 1 1 0 Alk phos increased 12 0 0 0 Blurred vision 4 2 0 0 Creatinine 6 0 0 1 Dyspnea 7 5 0 0 PN 6 3 0 0 Fatigue 6 8 2 0 Mucositis 5 2 0 0 Nausea 6 4 2 0 Constipation 6 0 0 0 Diarrhea 5 7 1 0 Alk phos, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; PN, peripheral neuropathy

Preliminary Efficacy Results n=17 Near-Complete Response/Complete Response 1 Partial Response 4 Minimal Response (MR) 4 Stable Disease 5 Progressive Disease 3 Clinical Benefit Rate ( MR): 53% 1 patient was not evaluable for efficacy as they were noncompliant and were removed during cycle 1

Patients on Trial: Number of Cycles Number of Cycles 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Number of cycles Ongoing therapy 0 Patient

Conclusions Enrollment is ongoing in cohort 4 with full dose ARRY-520 established from single agent Phase 1 (1.5 mg/m 2 /day) and 20/27 mg/m 2 carfilzomib; MTD has not been established ARRY-520 can be safely combined with carfilzomib, and the combination thus far is well tolerated with a manageable side effect profile and no unexpected toxicity Limited grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity Preliminary clinical benefit rate of 53% that appears durable; many patients still on study Subsequent Phase 1b dose expansion is planned at the MTD or maximum planned dose (MPD) of part A Part B with Phase 1 dose escalation of carfilzomib planned after MTD or MPD of ARRY-520 established in Part A

Acknowledgments Colleagues at MD Anderson: Robert Orlowski, Donna Weber, Sheeba Thomas, Michael Wang, Raymond Alexanian Array BioPharma and Onyx Trial was conceived, supported and started before carfilzomib was approved, combining 2 unapproved agents Onyx PRISM NTP (Proteasome Research and Integrative Science for Multiple Myeloma Onyx Novel Therapies Program) Patients/Caregivers