Special Review Decision: Fluazifop-P-butyl

Similar documents
Special Review Decision: Imazapyr

Sodium Lauryl Sulfate

Mono- and Di-Potassium Salts of Phosphorous Acid

Registration Decision. Metconazole

Cydia pomonella Granulovirus Strain M

Science Policy Notice

Registration Decision. Deltamethrin

Special Review of Acephate: Proposed Decision for Consultation

Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1288

Proposed Revision or Revocation of Maximum Residue Limits for Discontinued Agricultural Pest Control Products: Update 2

Zinc Oxide and Its Associated End-use Products (Swimming Pool and Spa Uses)

Proposed Registration Document. Fenamidone

3-Methyl-2-Cyclohexen-1- One (MCH Technical)

Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1256

Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1215

2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin- 3-one

Boric Acid and its Salts (Boron)

Regulatory Decision Document

Registration Decision. Pyraclostrobin. Insignia EG Fungicide Headline EC Fungicide Cabrio EG Fungicide

Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1219

Dimethoate. This document is published by the Health Canada Pest Management Regulatory Agency. For further information, please contact:

Ammonium Soap of Fatty Acid

Mono- and Di-Potassium Salts of Phosphorous Acid

Review of the 2004 Re-evaluation of Citronella Oil and Related Active Compounds for Use as Personal Insect Repellents

Proposed Re-evaluation Decision

N-Octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide (MGK-264) and its associated end-use products

Iron (Present as ferric phosphate) and Its Associated End-use Products

Proposed Registration Decision. Liquid Corn Gluten

Copper (present as cuprous oxide)

Proposed Registration Document. Tembotrione

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Proposed Re-evaluation Decision. Octhilinone

Oriental Mustard Seed Meal

aaaaaaaa Information Document on the Proposal to Reinstate Saccharin for Use as a Sweetener in Foods in Canada

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C

(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy) acetic Acid [2,4-D]

TECHNICAL & REGULATORY AFFAIRS REPORT. 77th Annual CSA Convention May 11, 2018 Presented by: Anthony Gene

Bowerpoil. Pesticide Regulation in Canada. Mandate

Classification of Products at the Cosmetic-Drug Interface

Regarding Establishment of a Uniform Limit in a Positive List System concerning Agricultural Chemicals Residues in Food etc.

(4-Chloro-2- methylphenoxy)acetic Acid [MCPA]

Registration Decision. Ferric Sodium EDTA

Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)

Module 34: Legal aspects, ADI and GRAS status of food additives

The regulatory landscape. The now and the not yet

Copper and Zinc Naphthenate Salts

Proposed Re-evaluation Decision. Ziram

Sodium Lauryl Sulfate

Food and Drug Regulations - Project Number Schedule F

Boric Acid and its Salts (Boron)

Health Canada s Safety Assessment Process for Sugar Substitutes

Upper Tolerances for Micronutrients in Fertilizers

Guidance Document for Source Establishments Reporting Adverse Reactions to Human Cells, Tissues and Organs

Canadian Grain Commission

Proposed Registration Decision. Noviflumuron

Carbaryl. This document is published by the Health Canada Pest Management Regulatory Agency. For further information, please contact:

Chemical food safety in the U.S. analysis of FDA s scientific basis for assessing chemical risk. Tom Neltner October 9, 2014

Provisional Translation Original: Japanese

FARM TO TABLE: PESTICIDE RESIDUES AND RISK ASSESSMENT

N-Methylneodecanamide (MNDA)

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

Human Health Risk Assessment Overview [For the APS/OPP Roundtable]

Proposed Registration Decision. Etoxazole

Health Canada s Proposed Approach to Managing Caffeinated Energy Drinks

Classification of Products at the Food Natural Health Product Interface: Products in Food Formats

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 1. Review report for the active substance Copper compounds

DRUG PRODUCT INTERCHANGEABILITY AND PRICING ACT

OVERVIEW OF FOOD SAFETY REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES. Presented By William C. Balek International Sanitary Supply Association March 30, 2001

Sulfuryl Fluoride. This Regulatory Note provides a summary of data reviewed and the rationale for the regulatory decision for these products.

MODIFICATION OF APPLICATION TO BECOME A LICENSED PRODUCER UNDER THE ACCESS TO CANNABIS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES REGULATIONS

Proposed Re-evaluation Decision. Lambda-cyhalothrin

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

Technical Summary Health Canada s Safety Evaluation of Irradiation of Fresh and Frozen Raw Ground Beef

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE

CALIFORNIA'S NEW CLEAR AND REASONABLE PROPOSITION 65 WARNING REGULATIONS Carol Brophy, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP

Expiry Date: yyyy-mm-dd Lot # XXXX-XXX This product is not to be sold or applied after the expiry date above.

Recall Guidelines. for Chinese Medicine Products

Labels and Pesticide Formulations

RATAK+ RODENTICIDE MINI-PELLETS

SUPPLEMENT TO NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL S PETITION TO CANCEL PET COLLAR USES FOR THE PESTICIDE PROPOXUR

GCC Guide for Control on Imported Foods

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

R.E.D. FACTS. Limonene. Pesticide Reregistration. Use Profile

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Access to Drugs in Exceptional Circumstances

- Notification to specify uniform limit (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 497, 2005)

ISPM No. 28 PHYTOSANITARY TREATMENTS FOR REGULATED PESTS (2007)

Food Additives Program

Natural Health Product Raw Material Policy

Global Regulation of Food Additives

Cycloxydim CYCLOXYDIM (179)

Safety Evaluation for Substances Directly Added to Food

AS/NZS :2014. Occupational noise management AS/NZS :2014. Part 4: Auditory assessment. Australian/New Zealand Standard

2007 Revisions to FDR and DPR regarding Cheese. Framework for Inspection. October 30, 2008 Dairy Stakeholder Meeting. Aussi disponible en français

Folpet (Pesticides) Summary. Risk assessment report. Food Safety Commission of Japan. Conclusion in Brief

Chemical Name: Metolachlor ESA CAS: Synonyms: Ethanesulfonate degradate of metolachlor; CGA

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

PIC/S GUIDANCE ON CLASSIFICATION OF GMP DEFICIENCIES

The terms used in these Directives are consistent with those defined by the Committee.

Food Labelling in Canada

Transcription:

Re-evaluation Note REV2016-14 Special Review Decision: Fluazifop-P-butyl (publié aussi en français) 30 September 2016 This document is published by the Health Canada Pest Management Regulatory Agency. For further information, please contact: Publications Internet: pmra.publications@hc-sc.gc.ca Pest Management Regulatory Agency healthcanada.gc.ca/pmra Health Canada Facsimile: 613-736-3758 2720 Riverside Drive Information Service: A.L. 6607 D 1-800-267-6315 or 613-736-3799 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9 pmra.infoserv@hc-sc.gc.ca

ISSN: 1925-0630 (print) 1925-0649 (online) Catalogue number: H113-5/2016-14E (print version) H113-5/2016-14E-PDF (PDF version) Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Health Canada, 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this information (publication or product) may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system, without prior written permission of the Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S5.

Special Review Decision Pursuant to subsection 17(2) of the Pest Control Products Act, the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) initiated a special review of pest control products containing fluazifop-p-butyl based on a decision taken by Norway in 2001. The PMRA evaluated the aspects of concern that prompted the special review in accordance with the subsection 18(4) of the Pest Control Products Act. The proposed special review decision was published for consultation in the Reevaluation Note REV2015-09, Special Review of Fluazifop-P-butyl: Proposed Decision for Consultation and it outlines the Agency s proposed decision and the reasons for it. Comments received during the consultation process were taken into consideration in making this special review decision and they did not result in changes to the proposed continued acceptability of pest control products containing fluazifop-p-butyl as described in REV2015-09. Appendix I summarizes the comments received during the consultation period and provides the PMRA s response to these comments. Following publication of REV2015-09, the PMRA has updated the human health risk assessment of fluazifop-p-butyl and additional label statements are now required (Appendix II). The PMRA, under the authority of the Pest Control Products Act, is confirming the current registration of technical grade active ingredient products containing fluazifop-p-butyl in Canada with the additional label statements outlined in Appendix II. Regulatory Directive DIR2014-01, Approach to Special Reviews, presents the details of the PMRA s special review approach. To comply with this decision, the required mitigation measures must be implemented on all products labels sold by registrants no later than 24 months after the publication date of this document. Registrants of the products containing fluazifop-p-butyl will be informed of the specific requirements affecting their product registration(s) and of the regulatory options available to them. Other Information Any person may file a notice of objection 1 regarding this decision on fluazifop-p-butyl within 60 days from the date of publication of this special review decision. For more information regarding the basis for objecting (which must be based on scientific grounds), please refer to the Pesticides and Pest Management portion of Health Canada s website, Request a Reconsideration of Decision, or contact the PMRA s Pest Management Information Service. 1 As per subsection 35(1) of the Pest Control Products Act. Page 1

Page 2

Appendix I Appendix I Comments and Responses The PMRA received comments from stakeholders in response to Re-evaluation Note REV2015-09, Special Review of Fluazifop-P-butyl: Proposed Decision for Consultation. The PMRA consolidated and summarized the comments related to this special review and provides responses below. 1.1 Comment on the requirement for an extra margin of safety Based on the available information regarding potential health concerns from a pre- and post-natal exposure perspective and the completeness of the toxicology database, the commenter questioned the selection of a 1-fold Pest Control Products Act factor and whether it would provide an appropriate margin of safety for PMRA s human health risk assessment PMRA Response For assessing risks from potential residues in food or from products used in or around homes or schools, the Pest Control Products Act requires the application of an additional 10-fold factor to threshold effects unless it is determined on the basis of reliable scientific data that a different margin of safety would be appropriate. This factor takes into account completeness of the data with respect to the exposure of, and toxicity to, infants and children, as well as potential pre- and post-natal toxicity. As summarized in REV2015-09, with respect to the completeness of the database, the fluazifop- P-butyl developmental and reproductive database contains the full complement of required studies including developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits, as well, a reproductive toxicity study in rats. With respect to sensitivity of the young, REV2015-09 considered evidence of developmental delay in the database including delayed ossification, increased incidences of hydronephrosis and decreased body weight gain during lactation. These effects were considered by the PMRA to be of low concern because they are not malformations and, therefore, the Pest Control Products Act factor was reduced to 1-fold. Since publication of REV2015-09, the PMRA completed the review of additional developmental studies that were recently submitted as part of a new use application, resulting in a reconsideration of the full toxicology database (Canada, 2016). Evidence of malformations including diaphragmatic hernia, microphthalmia and lens abnormalities were observed in developmental and reproductive toxicity studies, which represented serious effects and were observed in the presence and absence of maternal toxicity in different studies in the rat. Based on the reconsidered database, the PMRA has selected for acute dietary and occupational human health risk assessment a NOAEL of 7.1 mg/kg bw/day for developmental toxicity from the rat reproductive toxicity study. The selected endpoint is the lowest NOAEL for malformations in the database. The Pest Control Products Act factor has been retained at 3-fold when this developmental NOAEL is used for risk assessment (Canada, 2016). For chronic dietary exposure, a NOAEL of 0.51 mg/kg bw/day from a 2-year chronic toxicity study Page 3

Appendix I continues to be the most appropriate endpoint for risk assessment (consistent with REV2015-09), and the Pest Control Products Act factor was reduced to 1-fold for this scenario (Canada, 2016). Selection of this chronic endpoint is protective of all developmental effects observed in the database, including malformations, as it provides a margin of 1420 to the NOAEL for malformations established in the three generation reproductive toxicity study in rats, which is the lowest NOAEL for malformations in the database. It also provides a margin of 400 to the NOAEL in the rat developmental toxicity study, and is therefore considered protective. As part of the special review, the PMRA has re-assessed the human health risk assessment described in REV2015-09 to reflect the updated toxicology endpoints. This assessment takes into account all potential human health exposure scenarios (workers, non-workers, food and drinking water) and the updated toxicity information for fluazifop-p-butyl. For certain large field crops, additional label directions are required to ensure use of closed cab application equipment when more than 33 kg of active ingredient are handled in a single day and to limit the total amount handled per day to 50 kg (See Appendix II for label revisions). 1.2 Comment on the PMRA s review of aspects of concern PMRA acknowledges evidence of reproductive and developmental (teratogenic) effects. However, in contrast to Norway s conclusion, the PMRA considers that risks to workers are not a concern because of precautionary statements required on the label of products containing fluazifop-p-butyl. REV2015-09 does not explain how a label statement for personal protective equipment is considered adequate protection for Canadian workers, when Norway concluded that risks to workers (and potential risks to consumers) were unacceptable, and banned fluazifop-pbutyl. REV2015-09 also does not discuss risks of exposure to the general population or other workers (including vulnerable individuals) from residues when protective clothing is removed, transported and laundered, or from drift at the time of application. PMRA Response The PMRA follows a risk-based scientific approach in determining the risk to human health from pesticides. This approach takes into consideration both the estimated level of exposure based on the directions for use on the Canadian label as well as the toxicity of the pesticide. The PMRA has assessed the complete human health exposure scenario including risk to workers and non-workers as well as risk from food and drinking water. The risk assessment takes into account all potential exposure scenarios and the updated toxicity information for fluazifop-pbutyl. The PMRA occupational risk assessment takes into account information from the fluazifop-pbutyl label including the listed personal protective equipment, application rates and directions for use. The health risk assessment concluded that exposure and risk to workers mixing/loading and applying fluazifop-p-butyl, as well as re-entering treated sites following application, was not of concern when label directions are followed, as the level of exposure is well below the amount that caused adverse effects in animal studies. Page 4

Appendix I To further reduce exposure, additional label statements will be required to ensure use of enclosed-cab application equipment when more than 33 kg of active ingredient are used in a single day and to limit the total amount handled per day to 50 kg (See Appendix II for label revisions). There are no residential uses of fluazifop-p-butyl and any exposure from drift to residential areas, or from handling or laundering contaminated clothing, is expected to be significantly less than occupational mixer/loaded/applicator exposure and therefore also not of concern. The PMRA dietary risk assessment has considered total exposure to fluazifop-p-butyl from both domestically produced and imported foods, as well as from drinking water, and concluded that exposure is not of concern based on the current label directions for use and levels of fluazifop-pbutyl in imported commodities. Therefore, based on the risk assessment, human health exposure to workers and non-workers, as well as exposure from food and drinking water, is not of concern when used according to the label. Page 5

Page 6 Appendix I

Appendix II Appendix II: Label Amendments The following label statements must be added to the product label (Venture L Herbicide, Registration Number. 21209): DO NOT handle more than 50 kg active ingredient/day (400 L Venture L of product). A closed cab tractor is required when applying more than 33 kg active ingredient/day (264 L of Venture L product). Page 7

Page 8 Appendix II

References References Published Information PMRA Reference Number 2530509 Rotterdam Convention. 2001. Interim Secretariat for the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade, PIC Circular XIII - June 2001 2149292 Canada. 2011. Pest Management Regulatory Agency. Proposed Re-evaluation Decision PRVD2011-11 2192467 Canada. 2012. Pest Management Regulatory Agency. Re-evaluation Decision RVD2012-05 2530508 United States. 2005. Environmental Protection Agency. Fluazifop-P-butyl: Revised HED Chapter of the Tolerance Reassessment Eligibility Document (TRED) 2530504 United States. 2008. Environmental Protection Agency. Fluazifop-P-butyl. Amended Human Health Risk Assessment to Support Use on Dry Beans, Peanuts and Post-bloom Application to Soybeans. 2530507 United States. 2014. Environmental Protection Agency. Fluazifop-P-butyl. Human Health Risk Assessment Scoping Document in Support of Registration Review 2530505 EFSA. 2012. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fluazifop-p (evaluated variant fluazifop-p-butyl), EFSA Journal 2012;10(11): 2945 2556817 Canada, 2016. Evaluation Report for Category B, Subcategory 5.0 Application. New Maximum residue limit for previously assessed technical grade active ingredient. Fluazifop-P-butyl Unpublished Information PMRA Reference Number 2530506 Norway. Form For Notification of Final Regulatory Action to Ban or Severely Restrict a Chemical Fluazifop-P-butyl. Norwegian Agricultural Inspection Service Page 9