Scientific & Clinical Evidence Jason membrane

Similar documents
botiss dental bone & tissue regeneration biomaterials collacone max Innovative composite matrix socket preservation form-fitting resorbable composite

botiss biomaterials bone & tissue regeneration collacone max Innovative composite matrix socket preservation form-fitting resorbable composite

Clinical cases by Dr. Fernando Rojas-Vizcaya. botiss. dental bone & tissue regeneration. biomaterials. strictly biologic

Bone augmentation with biomaterials

Case reports by Dr. Roland Török IMPLANT INSTITUTE TÖRÖK. botiss. dental bone & tissue regeneration. biomaterials.

soft tissue Jason membrane collprotect membrane botiss native reliable resorbable Natural collagen membranes for GBR/GTR

The Original remains unique.

Product Catalog. Dental Bone & Tissue Regeneration

Bone augmentation with maxgraft

THE NEW STANDARD OF EXCELLENCE IN BIOMATERIALS. Collagenated heterologous cortico-cancellous bone mix + TSV Gel GTO I N S P I R E D B Y N A T U R E

RELIABLE WHEN IT COUNTS. The unique collagenase-resistant membrane protects bone graft and supports treatment success even when exposed 4

BEGO BIOMATERIALS When the result counts

BioVin Collagen Membrane

Innovative Range of Regenerative Solutions

More than bone regeneration. A total solution.

Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration

Cerasorb M DENTAL. O:\Zulassung\Cerasorb Dental Kanada 2013\Texte\Cerasorb M Dental final IFU docx

D. Rothamel, T. Fienitz, A. Happe und J. Zöller

REASONS TO USE R.T.R.

Product Catalog. botiss. dental bone & tissue regeneration. biomaterials. strictly biologic

soft tissue mucoderm botiss native stable 3-dimensional 3D-Regenerative Tissue Graft Handling, Clinical Application and Cases

A WIDE RANGE OF REGENERATIVE SOLUTIONS

BONE AUGMENTATION AND GRAFTING

SalvinOss Xenograft Bone Graft Material In Vivo Testing Summary

REGENERATIONTIME. A Case Report by. Ridge Augmentation and Delayed Implant Placement on an Upper Lateral Incisor

Regeneration Bone Grafting & Soft Tissue Management

botiss biomaterials bone & tissue regeneration Product Catalog Dental bone and tissue regeneration soft tissue biomaterials education hard tissue

Evaluation of different grafting materials in three-wall intra-bony defects around dental implants in beagle dogs

We want to keep you smiling. Bone regeneration with Geistlich Bio-Oss and Geistlich Bio-Gide

hard tissue maxresorb & maxresorb inject botiss synthetic resorbable safe Innovative biphasic calcium phosphate Scientific and clinical evidence

Product Information. When one option is not enough.

Resorbable bilayer synthetic membrane Biomimetic tissue-engineered matrix for GBR and GTR

Biomaterials Line. MIS Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Regeneration Bone Grafting & Soft Tissue Management

Inion GTR Biodegradable Membrane System

Alpha-Bio's GRAFT complete portfolio bone substitutes resorbable membranes best combination of quality & value with efficient, easy-to-use products

Surgical Guide Core Products

Regeneration Bone Grafting & Soft Tissue Management

hard tissue cerabone natural safe pure botiss biomaterials Scientific and clinical evidence NATURAL BOVINE BONE GRAFTING MATERIAL

The Essential Choice. With the Benefits of Biologic Predictability

Complications of postoperative swelling of the maxillary sinus membrane after sinus floor augmentation

botiss maxgraft bonering botiss maxgraft bonebuilder Because one option is not enough. PROCESSED ALLOGENIC BONERING

Puros Cancellous Particulate Allograft & Puros Block Allograft

Procedure Manual and Catalog

Redefining Regeneration

Bone Grafting for Socket Preservation

We Want to Keep You Smiling. Bone Regeneration with Geistlich Bio-Oss and Geistlich Bio-Gide

Symbios Xenograft Granules Porcine Bone Graft Material

Inion BioRestore. Bone Graft Substitute. Product Overview

THE NEXT FRONTIER OF BONE REGENERATION

hard tissue cerabone botiss Natural bovine bone grafting material Scientific & Clinical Evidence by Dr. Marius Steigmann et al.

biomaterials Product Catalog botiss soft tissue education hard tissue Dental bone and tissue regeneration dental bone & tissue regeneration

soft tissue mucoderm native stable 3-dimensional botiss 3D-Regenerative Tissue Graft Handling, Clinical Application and Cases

Cytoflex Barrier Membrane Clinical Evaluation

Pre op Failed endodontic treatment with sinus involvement.

hard tissue cerabone botiss Natural bovine bone grafting material Scientific & Clinical Evidence by Dr. Marius Steigmann et al.

THE NEXT FRONTIER OF BONE REGENERATION

The Essential Choice. With the Benefits of Biologic Predictability

SPECIALIST CURRICULUM 2019/2020

Tooth out what's next?

A new approach with an in-situ self-hardening grafting material

Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration

Case Study. Case # 1 Author: Dr. Suheil Boutros (USA) 2013 Zimmer Dental, Inc. All rights reserved. 6557, Rev. 03/13.

botiss dental bone & tissue regeneration biomaterials mucoderm 3D-Regenerative Tissue Graft strictly biologic

Soft-Tissue Success with the. Clinical Success. Proven Matrix. with the Proven. Geistlich Mucograft Geistlich Mucograft Seal

Clinical Success. with the Proven. Clinical Success. with the Proven Bone Substitute Products

Vertical and Horizontal Augmentation Using Guided Bone Regeneration. Ph.D. Thesis. Dr. med. dent. et univ. Istvan Urban

Symbios. Product Catalog

OSSIX PLUS The Resorbable Collagen Membrane Instructions for Use for OSSIX PLUS

Puros Cancellous Particulate Allograft & Puros Block Allograft

BONE GRAFTING. Product Catalog

Bringing you Geistlich biocompatibility with improved application and handling benefits. Your combination for success

THE NEXT FRONTIER OF BONE REGENERATION. where Technology meets Nature

Superior bone formation:

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Titanium Mesh and Particulate Allograft A Case Report

A wide variety of membrane options

Properties of GENESYS TM Biocomposite Material Compared to Pure Polylactide (PLA)

The treatment of destructive periodontal disease, due to specific periodontopathic

FDBA(Freeze Dried Bone Allograft) SureOss Cortical Bone - Powder / Chip. OsteOss Cortical with Cancellous Bone - Powder / Chip

( ) 2009;28(2):89-94

THE NEXT FRONTIER OF BONE REGENERATION. where Technology meets Nature

B&B DENTAL. implant company

A Retrospective Analysis of Maxillary Sinuses and Implant Survival after Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation. Marlon Foote, DDS Periodontics

Socket preservation in the daily practice: A clinical case report

Designed by nature, developed for clinicians. creos xenogain and creos xenoprotect

Bioactive Glass Biphasic β-tcp & HA Granules Alkylene Oxide Polymer Carrier. MEDLINEUNITE Bioactive Bone Graft

SMARTBRANE SIMPLE RELIABLE PURE NEW! Resorbable Pericardium Membrane MORE ECONOMIC. THE SMALLEST MEMBRANE 10 x 10 mm. 10 x10

Evaluation of a Combination Allograft Material Compared to DFDBA in Alveolar Ridge Preservation. Sanju P. Jose

The body wants to heal

Socket Treatment. Procedure Guide

Immediate Implant Placement:

Product Information. When one option is not enough.

Versatile grafting Solutions

HOSPITAL INNOVATIONS

DRIVING THE FUTURE. About HOSPITAL INNOVATIONS. Strong commitment to healthcare innovation

Product Information. MIS Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Maryland AGD AE and Socket Grafting 2015

RIDGE PRESERVATION. Each extracted tooth presents a new challenge. What can Ridge Preservation measures achieve? FOCUS

2: Canullo L, Tallarico M, Penarrocha D, Meloni SM, Penarrocha M. Abstracts. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9 Suppl 1:9-54. PubMed PMID:

All-on-4 treatment concept

Transcription:

Scientific & Clinical Evidence Jason membrane Pericardium GBR/GTR Membrane Facts - CE since 2009 - so far no serious clinical complication or objection - approx. 250.000 successful clinical treatments (09/2014) - no product related recall or remark November 2014 1

Preclinical studies 1. Keywords: morphologic structure; biodegradation; pericardium membrane; Jason membrane vs. BioGide Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):146-54. Biocompatibility and Biodegradation of a native porcine pericardium membrane: results of in vitro and in vivo examinations D. Rothamel, R. Smeets, T. Fienitz, F. Schwarz, T. Dreiseidler, L. Ritter, A. Happe, J. Zöller The objective of this pilot study was to examine, in vitro and in vivo, a novel native collagen membrane extracted from porcine pericardium. The morphologic structure of two different native collagen membranes (Remotis=Jason membrane and BioGide) was examined. Results for Jason membrane: Scanning Electron Microscopy: Jason membrane showed multi-layered collagen matrix structure with an interconnected system of pores. Biocompatibility: 24 samples of Jason membrane and BioGide; SaOS-2 osteoblastlike cells for 2h, 3 days and 7 days: Jason membrane 3x higher cell numbers after 7 days incubation with cells. Biodegradation, barrier function and bone formation: dog model (beagle dogs) socket extraction, 4 months healing time: comparison of cerabone /Jason membrane vs. BioOss/BioGide. For BioGide considerable degradation was noted after 4 to 8 weeks, for Jason membrane after 8 to 12 weeks. Follow up period 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks. After 24 weeks, defects with cerabone and covered by Jason membrane were completely organized with newly formed bone. New bone matrix was localized on the surface of the bone substitute particles or bridging two or more particles, leading to a 3D mineralized network. November 2014 2

2. Keywords: case reports; histological evaluation; biodegradation; Jason membrane and collprotect membrane EDI Journal I 1/2012 I Page 62 Clinical aspects of novel types of collagen membranes and matrices: Current issues in soft- and hard- tissue augmentation D. Rothamel, R. R. Török, J. Neugebauer, T. Fienitz, M. Scheer, M. Kreppel, R. Mischkowski, J. Zöller Guided bone regeneration and guided tissue regeneration are based on the isolation of potentially regenerative cell types such as periodontal ligament fibroblasts and osteoblasts on the one hand from rapidly proliferating epithelial and connective tissues on the other. The objective of these procedures is the predictable regeneration of lost tissue. Mechanical barriers play an important role in regeneration processes. The possible use of Jason membrane and collprotect membrane as a barrier membrane is supported by the fact that native collagen is transferable from animals to humans and plays an active role in the formation of blood clots, promoting rapid stabilization of the wound area. In addition, collagen has a chemotactic effect on the fibroblasts of the periodontal ligament. In case of exposure to the oral cavity, certain periodontal pathogens appear to contribute to the biodegradation of collagen membranes. The resorption of collagen membranes exposed to the resident biota of the oral cavity is significantly accelerated. Results for Jason membrane: The pericardium membrane, still exhibits a pronounced barrier function after eight weeks. The thin multilayer structure and good tissue integration are readily discernible. Jason membrane reveals a wide branching structure consisting of individual collagen layers forming an interconnected system of pores. Due to their different morphology, Jason membrane takes significantly longer to biodegrade than BioGide. November 2014 3

3. Keywords: pericardium; biodegradation; canine model; horizontal augmentation GBR; Jason membrane vs. BioGide Sztuka Implantologii 2/2009 Biocompatibility and biodegradation of native, porcine pericardial membrane. Results of in vivo/in vitro studies. D. Rothamel Three different native collagen membranes: Jason membrane, BioGide and CopiOs were tested in vitro and in vivo. Results for Jason membrane: In vivo studies showed massive cell proliferation on Jason membrane, which was statistically significant when comparing with BioGide. The surface of Jason membrane was tightly covered with SaOs-2 cells. The animal trial showed that Jason membrane was integrated with surrounding tissue without irritation. Resorption of Jason membrane was constantly occurring during first 2-3 months. Conclusion: It can be assumed that Jason membrane present high biocompatibility. Jason membrane undergo resorption during 3 months without any signs of tissue irritation. 4. Keywords: histological evaluation; experimental study rats; native collagen matrices; pericardium; biodegradation; tissue integration; cell invasion; Jason membrane 20 th Annual Scientific meeting of the European Association of Osseointegration 2011, Athens, Greece, Poster 449 Biodegradation pattern of native and cross-linked porcine collagen matricesan experimental study in rats D. Rothamel, T. Fienitz, M. Benner, A. Happe, M. Kreppel, M. Scheer, J. Zöller November 2014 4

The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation and tissue integration of two novel native collagen membranes (Jason membrane and collprotect membrane) for GTR and GBR, harvested from porcine pericardium and dermis. 40 rats, 5 groups, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks Results for Jason membrane and collprotect membrane: Healing was uneventful in all animals. For GBR membranes, histological evaluation revealed significant differences regarding resorption time and tissue integration. Jason membrane was integrated within the first week and remained stable for a healing period of 8-12 weeks. Tissue integration and cell invasion took longer for collprotect membrane, however dermal collagen of collprotect membrane was resorbed faster within the first 4-8 weeks. Conclusion: The present animal study showed that Jason membrane shows significant longer resorption time than collprotect membrane. 5. Keywords: surface morphology; biocompatibility; Jason membrane; maxresorb Academy of Osseointegration Orlando USA 2010, #248 Surface morphology, biocompatibility and osseous organization of a new biphasic bone substitute (maxresorb ). A combined in-vitro/in-vivo analysis. D. Rothamel, J. Neugebauer, M. Scheer, L. Ritter, T. Dreiseidler, T. Lingohr, R. Mischkowski, J. Zoeller The aim of the present study was to investigate surface morphology, biocompatibility and osseous organisation of a new biphasic bone substitute maxresorb (MR), 60% HA/40% ß-TCP. For biocompatibility testing, granules were incubated with human osteoblastlike cells (SaOs2). In the in-vivo part, MR was used for lateral augmentation in dogs. Three months after tooth extraction full-thickness flaps were raised in the premolar November 2014 5

region on both sides of the maxilla and 0.5 g of MR (0.5-1 mm size) was placed on the respective jaw sites. Grafts were covered with a rehydrated collagen membrane (Jason Membrane). After surgical flap elevation, wounds were closed using resorbable single sutures. After an uneventful healing period of 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks (n = 2, respectively) the animals were sacrificed. Results for maxresorb : Histologically, an initial new bone formation (blue) arising from the basal bone bed (lilac) was observed for the 4-week specimens. The MR granules (grey) appeared surrounded by blood vessels (blue) and embedded in a loose regenerative matrix. After a healing period of eight weeks, the entire augmentation material was dominated by newly formed hard tissue. The individual MR granules (grey) appeared largely encapsulated in woven bone or joined to each other in a kind of network via hard tissue bridges. The transition between the bone substitute material and the woven bone was very accentuated. A sporadic initial growing of hard substance into the porous parts of the granules could be seen. A partly moniliform arrangement of osteoblasts could be seen on the surface of the trabeculae. Actual bone marrow with fat cells and blood vessels was identified in the non-mineralised parts. An inflammatory reaction could not be detected. After 24 weeks, the augmentation materials appeared for the most part regenerated with lamellar bone tissue. Whereas most MR particles could still be clearly distinguished from the surrounding hard tissue, under greater magnification others showed only rudimentary borders with the vital bone tissue. In many places, clear indications of functional transformation in the sense of bone resorption and apposition could be seen. Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study it was concluded that MR is a porous, nanostructured bone substitute with high biocompatibility, fast osseous organisation, good volume maintenance and slow resorption. November 2014 6

Clinical results 6. Keywords: Case series, GBR, GTR, bone substitutes, collagen membranes, alveolar bone defects, Jason membrane DENT IMPLANTOL 2012, 16, 5, 360-369 Comparison of allogenic and xenogenic bone substitutes with pericardium membrane for guided bone augmentation of alveolar defects N. Papagiannoulis, O. Daum, D. Tadic, M. Steigmann The aim of the present case series study was to evaluate the barrier function of pericardium collagen membrane during alveolar augmentation. 8 patients, age range 35-68 years, post op control 3, 7, 14 and 30 days, recall 12 weeks after surgery, augmentation with maxgraft and cerabone 19 implants successful inserted. Average bone width gain with cerabone 4.96 mm and average bone width gain with maxgraft 2.69 mm. Results with Jason membrane: bone gain after augmentation from 0.6 mm to 6.6 mm in average the bone gain was 3.78 mm. In total 18 mandible defects and 1 maxilla defect was treated. Conclusion: This case series have shown that the use of Jason membrane for guided bone regeneration e.g. lateral augmentation, socket preservation, horizontal ridge augmentation and sinus elevation was suitable. November 2014 7

7. Keywords: sinus floor elevation; sintered natural bovine bone mineral; histological case report study; pericardium membrane; cerabone and Jason membrane zzi 2011; 27 (1) Sinus floor elevation using a sintered, natural bone mineral D. Rothamel, R. Smeets, A. Happe, T. Fienitz, F. Schwarz, J. Zöller The aim of the present study was the histological and clinical evaluation of the xenogenic bone substitute material cerabone for the indications one stage and two stage sinus floor elevation. 12 patients; average age of patients 54.4 years; 15 Sinus lifts; histologically and histomorphometrically; 6 two stage procedures; lateral window covered with Jason membrane; six months radiological control or biopsy was taken Results for cerabone and Jason membrane: All patients showed good hard tissue regeneration of the sinus. Neither resorption nor dislocation of the cerabone was observed. Radiologically, good volume stability of the graft was observed. Histologically, cerabone was complete osseous integrated in newly formed bone matrix. Newly formed bone 25.8-49.6%; Remaining cerabone 28.6-38.5%; in the two stage procedures, all implants achieved adequate primary stability. Conclusion: After a healing period of six months, good bony consolidation of the augmentation was seen clinically and histologically in all patients. 8. Keywords: sinus lift; synthetic bone graft; implant stability; Jason membrane; maxresorb Acta stomatol Croat. 2014;48(1):25-32. November 2014 8

Assessment of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift Procedures with Different Grafting Materials Damir Jelušić, Ivan Puhar, Darije Plančak The objective of this research was to evaluate implant stability following sinus lift with two grafting materials (maxresorb ), and to compare it with the results obtained for the implants placed in a pristine posterior maxilla. The study included 44 healthy patients with an existing indication for sinus lift procedure (test group). 46 implants were placed following sinus lift with a pure-phase beta-tricalcium phosphate, while 39 implants were placed following augmentation with 60% hydroxyapatite with 40% beta-tricalcium phosphate material (maxresorb ). The control group consisted of 48 healthy patients who were treated with 85 implants but without bone augmentation in posterior maxilla. Astra Tech OsseoSpeed implants were placed in all subjects. Resonance frequency analysis was used in both groups for determining implant stability 4 months after insertion. A mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) was calculated on the basis of 3 measurements. After lifting the Schneiderian membrane from the sinus floor, depending on the randomization, a pure-phase ß-TCP bone grafting material or a 60% HA with 40% ß-TCP material (maxresorb ) was applied after previous rehydration with 1-5 ml of sterile saline. Buccal window was covered with rehydrated collagen membrane (Jason membrane). A full thickness flap was adapted and the wound was sutured. Control conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was recorded to exclude dislocation of the bone grafting material. Results for maxresorb : No statistical difference was observed in ISQ values of implants placed with and without augmentation procedure (p=0,789). Statistically significant difference was not found when ISQ values of implants placed following particular grafting material were compared with ISQ values of corresponding implants in a pristine bone (p=0.697 and p=0.402). Implants placed following HA/ß-TCP maxresorb showed higher ISQ values, but statistical significance was not observed (p=0.402). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the implant stability is comparable among implants placed in the posterior maxilla regardless of sinus lift and November 2014 9

grafting procedure. Implants placed in the grafted posterior maxilla can be predictably loaded as the implants placed in a non-grafted, pristine maxilla. November 2014 10