Enterobacteriaceae with acquired carbapenemases, 2016

Similar documents
Enterobacteriaceae with acquired carbapenemases, 2015

Spread of carbapenems resistant Enterobacteriaceae in South Africa; report from National Antimicrobial Resistance Reference Laboratory

Emergence of non-kpc carbapenemases: NDM and more

Detection of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriacae from Clinical Isolates

The role of an AMR reference laboratory

Educational Workshops 2016

Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: Prof P. Nordmann Bicêtre hospital, South-Paris Med School

Guidance on screening and confirmation of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriacae (CRE) December 12, 2011

Global Epidemiology of Carbapenem- Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)

MHSAL Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Antimicrobial Resistant Organisms (AROs) - Response to Questions

ALERT. Clinical microbiology considerations related to the emergence of. New Delhi metallo beta lactamases (NDM 1) and Klebsiella

Determining the Optimal Carbapenem MIC that Distinguishes Carbapenemase-Producing

Emergence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in France, 2004 to 2011.

Laboratory testing for carbapenems resistant Enterobacteriacae (CRE)

Detecting carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae

The Public Health Benefit of CRE Colonization Testing

Public Health Surveillance for Multi Drug Resistant Organisms in Orange County

Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Screening

Differentiation of Carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae by Triple disc Test

β CARBA Test Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains Contents 1. INTENDED USE

Burns outbreaks - the UHB experience

10/4/16. mcr-1. Emerging Resistance Updates. Objectives. National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases. Alex Kallen, MD, MPH, FACP

#Corresponding author: Pathology Department, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College. Road, Academia, Level 7, Diagnostics Tower, , Singapore

Burns outbreaks - the UHB experience

Received 31 January 2011/Returned for modification 2 March 2011/Accepted 15 March 2011

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Julie Creighton and Clare Tibbs. Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch

ST11 KPC-2 Klebsiella pneumoniae detected in Taiwan

(Plasmid mediated) Carbapenemases. Timothy R. Walsh, Cardiff University, Wales

Original Article Clinical Microbiology

Detecting CRE. what does one need to do?

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR); July 2014.

Regional Emergence of VIM producing carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (VIM CRPA)

Enterobacteriaceae? ECDC EVIDENCE BRIEF. Why focus on. Update on the spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe

Recommendations for the Management of Carbapenem- Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in Acute and Long-term Acute Care Hospitals

In-House Standardization of Carba NP Test for Carbapenemase Detection in Gram Negative Bacteria

LABORATORY TRENDS. International Accreditation BC PUBLIC HEALTH MICROBIOLOGY & REFERENCE LABORATORY. Vancouver, BC. March 15, 2013.

Scottish Microbiology and Virology Network. Carbapenemase producers: screening and the new Scottish AMR Satellite Reference Laboratory Service

Rapid identification of emerging resistance in Gram negatives. Prof. Patrice Nordmann

PROFESSOR PETER M. HAWKEY

THE INVASION BY CARBAPENEMASE-PRODUCING ENTEROBACTERIACEAE

Lane CR, Kwong JC, Romanes F, Easton M, Cronin K, Waters MJ, Stevens K, Schultz MB, Sherry NL, Tai A, Ballard SA, Seemann T, Stinear T & Howden BP

Infection Control Strategies to Avoid Carbapenam Resistance in Hospitals. Victor Lim International Medical University Malaysia

Detecting Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: why isn t there a single best method?

Phenotypic Detection Methods of Carbapenemase Production in Enterobacteriaceae

Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 with KPC-2 in Hong Kong. Title. Ho, PL; Tse, CWS; Lai, EL; Lo, WU; Chow, KH

Resistance to Polymyxins in France

β- Lactamase Gene carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae and its Clinical Implication

The Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) Epidemic Why it matters? What it is? What Can You Do About It?

Evaluation of Six Phenotypic Methods for the Detection of Carbapenemases in Gram-Negative Bacteria With Characterized Resistance Mechanisms

β-lactamase inhibitors

Phenotypic detection of ESBLs and carbapenemases

Supplementary Material Hofko M et al., Detection of carbapenemases by real-time PCR and melt-curve analysis on the BD MAX TM System

Navigating Through Current and Emerging Issues in Outbreaks

Detection of NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Kenya

KPC around the world Maria Virginia Villegas, MD, MSC

Carbapenemases: the Versatile -Lactamases

Screening and detection of carbapenemases

Carbapenem Disks on MacConkey agar as screening methods for the detection of. Carbapenem-Resistant Gram negative rods in stools.

Positive for carbapenemase production by a phenotypic method

CRO and CPE: Epidemiology and diagnostic tests

In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Isolates. in a Phase 3 Open-label Clinical Trial for Complicated

NONFERMENTING GRAM NEGATIVE RODS. April Abbott Deaconess Health System Evansville, IN

Standardisation of testing for Carbapenemase Producing Organisms (CPO) in Scotland

Epidemiology of the β-lactamase resistome among Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the Chicago region

Abstract. Introduction. Editor: R. Canton

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases The Biggest Antibiotic Resistance Threats

LABORATORY TRENDS. Laboratory News PUBLIC HEALTH MICROBIOLOGY & REFERENCE LABORATORY. Vancouver, BC. December 21, 2011.

AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 13 October 2008 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi: /aac

Multidrug-resistant organisms are a major public health

Under the radar. Two prolonged outbreaks of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) at a tertiary hospital in Canberra, Australia

Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures

New Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance and Methods for Carbapenemase Detection

Emerging Infections, Outbreaks, and Steps of an Outbreak Investigation Across the Healthcare Continuum

Detection of NDM-1, VIM-1, KPC, OXA-48, and OXA-162 carbapenemases by MALDI- TOF mass spectrometry

Noelisa Montero, MPH. Epidemiologist Consultant. October 19, 2017 Connecticut Department of Public Health Healthcare Associated Infections Program

Toolkit for the Management of Carbapenemase Producing Organisms (CPO)

Discussion points CLSI M100 S19 Update. #1 format of tables has changed. #2 non susceptible category

The Emergence of Carbapenem Resistance in Canada and Globally. CNISP Annual Meeting Delta Ottawa January 19, 2012

Evaluation of CHROMagar msupercarba for the detection of carbapenemaseproducing Gram-negative organisms

Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan

University of Groningen

The Year in Infection Control

Nature and Science 2017;15(10)

Emerging Infections, Outbreaks, and Steps of an Outbreak Investigation Across the Healthcare Continuum

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE): Coming to a hospital near you?

GUIDE TO INFECTION CONTROL IN THE HOSPITAL. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Sensitive and specific Modified Hodge Test for KPC and metallo-beta-lactamase

Antibiotic Treatment of GNR MDR Infections. Stan Deresinski

LABORATORY TRENDS. Revision of Amoebiasis Reportable Case Definition BC PUBLIC HEALTH MICROBIOLOGY & REFERENCE LABORATORY. continued...

Detection of SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CHDL-producing. Acinetobacter baumannii using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry

Appendix B: Provincial Case Definitions for Reportable Diseases

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

CARBAPENEM RESISTANCE FROM DIAGNOSIS TO OUTBREAK MANAGEMENT

CARBAPENEM RESISTANCE From diagnosis to outbreak management

Insert for Kit 98006/98010/ KPC/Metallo-B-Lactamase Confirm Kit KPC+MBL detection Kit KPC/MBL and OXA-48 Confirm Kit REVISION: DBV0034J

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Epidemiology and Prevention

Impact of the isolation medium for detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae using an updated version of the Carba NP test

2612 Page. *Yusuf, I 1., Rabiu A.T 1., Haruna, M 2. and Abdullahi, S. A 3. Phone:

CARBAPENEMS ARE THE recommended treatment

Transcription:

Enterobacteriaceae with acquired carbapenemases, 2016 Background The acquired or transferable (as opposed to chromosomally encoded) carbapenemases found in Enterobacteriaceae belong to three of the four major classes of β-lactamases: classes A, B and D. 1 Class A acquired carbapenemases include the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases, the so-called KPCs. Class B metallo-βlactamases (MBLs) include several types of acquired carbapenemases, the most common being the New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs), and the IMP and VIM metallo-β-lactamases. Class D acquired carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae belong to the OXA-48 group of β-lactamases. DNA mutations resulting in changes in the amino acid sequence of the carbapenemase have produced an ever increasing range of subtypes or variants of each type of carbapenemase. For example, since the first NDM (NDM-1) was described in 2009, a further 17 subtypes (designated NDM-2 to NDM-18) have been described, with each subtype differing by at least one amino acid from any other subtype. Methods In New Zealand, diagnostic microbiology laboratories are requested to refer all isolates of possible carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) to ESR for confirmation and further investigation. At ESR isolates are screened for carbapenemases using inhibitor-based tests, the modified Hodge test and the carbapenem inactivation method. PCRs are performed for the genes encoding KPCs (blakpc); NDM, IMP, VIM, GIM, SIM and SPM type MBLs (blandm, blaimp, blavim, blagim, blasim and blaspm); and the OXA-48-like carbapenemases (blaoxa-48-like). When any of these carbapenemase genes are detected, the gene is sequenced to determine the subtype. Basic epidemiological data, including overseas travel and hospitalisation history, is collected for patients with confirmed CPE. 1. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20: 440-58. 1

Number of isolates by carbapenemase class Total number of CPE isolates This report summarises information on CPE confirmed by ESR in 2016. Reports on CPE confirmed between 2009, when the first isolate was identified in New Zealand, and 2015 are available at https://surv.esr.cri.nz/antimicrobial/accqenterobacteriaceae.php. Results Forty-five distinct CPE were isolated from 38 patients in 2016. Six patients had 2 isolates with distinct carbapenemase types (See Table 1, footnote 3). The 45 CPE isolates confirmed in 2016 exceeded the total number (41) confirmed in 2015 (Figure 1). 75.6% (34/45) of the CPE confirmed in 2016 were isolated from specimens taken to screen for multidrug-resistant organisms. Among the 11 CPE from clinical specimens, 10 (90.9%) were from urinary sources. Figure 1. Number of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates identified in New Zealand, by carbapenemase class, each year from 2009 to 2016 35 50 30 25 20 40 30 15 10 5 20 10 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 0 New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDM) OXA-48-like carbapenemases Total number CPE Metallo-β-lactamases other than NDM K. pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC) Note: Multiple, distinct CPE isolates from the same patient are included, but duplicate isolates of the same species with the same type of carbapenemase from the same patient are excluded. In 2016, there were three CPE isolates that carried the genes encoding for an NDM and an OXA-48-like carbapenemase. These three isolates are counted in the number of isolates for both these carbapenemase classes. 2

Types of carbapenemases identified The data in this section takes into account all carbapenemase genes of different classes found in CPE isolates. More than one class of carbapenemase was identified in three CPE isolates in 2016: two Escherichia coli isolates had NDM-1 and OXA-181 and one K. pneumoniae isolate had NDM-5 and OXA-232 (see Table 1, footnote 2). As has been observed in earlier years, the most frequently identified carbapenemases among CPE identified in New Zealand in 2016 were various subtypes of NDM (Table 1). NDM carbapenemases accounted for 64.6% (31/48) of the carbapenemases identified in 2016, and have accounted for 57.9% (73/126) of carbapenemases identified in CPE in New Zealand to date. The only other MBL type identified in 2016 was IMP, which accounted for 4.2% (2/48) of the carbapenemases identified in 2016. IMP and VIM MBLs have accounted for 7.1% (9/126) of all carbapenemases identified in CPE in New Zealand. The second most common carbapenemases identified were the OXA-48-like carbapenemases which accounted for 27.1 (13/48) of the carbapenemases identified in 2016 (Table 1), and have accounted for 27.8% (35/126) of all carbapenemases identified in CPE in New Zealand. Only two (4.2%) of the 48 carbapenemases identified in 2016 were KPC types, and KPCs have accounted for 7.1% (9/126) of all carbapenemases identified in CPE in New Zealand. In New Zealand, KPCs have been identified exclusively in K. pneumoniae. 3

Table 1. Types of carbapenemases identified among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by species, 2016 Carbapenemase type and subtype Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae Number of isolates Species Klebsiella oxytoca Enterobacter cloacae Morganella morganii All species KPC 0 2 0 0 0 2 KPC-2 0 2 0 0 0 2 NDM 23 1 3 2 2 1 31 NDM-1 4 2 1 2 1 10 NDM-4 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 NDM-5 18 1 1 0 0 20 NDM-7 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 IMP 1 0 1 0 0 2 IMP-4 1 0 0 0 0 1 IMP-8 0 0 1 0 0 1 OXA-48-like 7 6 0 0 0 13 OXA-48 1 0 0 0 0 1 OXA-162 0 1 0 0 0 1 OXA-181 6 0 0 0 0 6 OXA-232 0 5 0 0 0 5 Total 29 2 10 2 3 2 1 45 2,3 1 The 23 E. coli isolates with an NDM carbapenemase include one isolate that had two NDM subtypes: NDM-4 + NDM-7. 2 The 29 E. coli isolates include two isolates that had both NDM-1 + OXA-181. Therefore 31 carbapenemases of different classes were identified among the 29 E. coli isolates. The 10 K. pneumoniae isolates include one isolate that had both NDM-5 + OXA-232. Therefore 11 carbapenemases of different classes were identified among the 10 K. pneumoniae isolates. Correspondingly, a total of 48 carbapenemases of different classes were identified among the total 45 CPE isolates. 3 The 45 isolates include multiple, distinct CPE from six patients: E. coli with NDM-5 and E. cloacae with NDM-1; E. coli with NDM-4 + NDM-7 and K. pneumoniae with NDM-1; E. coli with NDM-1, K. pneumoniae with NDM-5 + OXA-232, and E. cloacae with NDM-1; E. coli with NDM-5 and K. pneumoniae with OXA-232; E. coli with NDM-5 and E. coli with OXA-181; and E. coli with NDM-5 and E. coli with NDM-1 + OXA-181. 4

Probable place of acquisition of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae Overseas travel and hospitalisation history was reported for the patients from whom 42 of the total 45 CPE were isolated in 2016 (see Table 2 footnote 3). 81.0% (34/42) of the CPE, from patients for whom travel history was reported, were from patients who had been overseas. India was by far the most common probable place of acquisition (Table 2). 67.6% (23/34) of the CPE apparently acquired overseas were from patients who were hospitalised overseas. Of the 11 CPE isolated from patients who had travelled but not been hospitalised overseas, all were probably acquired in India. All six patients who had 2 distinct carbapenemase-producing isolates had been hospitalised overseas (see Table 2, footnote 1), five in India and one in China. All four CPE isolates that had more than one type of carbapenemase were from patients who had been in India (see Table 2, footnote 7). In 2016, CPE were isolated from eight patients who had no history of recent overseas travel. Two of these patients apparently acquired their CPE following crosstransmission events in New Zealand healthcare facilities (see next section). A further patient had a family member who had recently been in India (see Table 2, footnote 4). However, the likely source of the CPE for the other five patients who had not been overseas was not identified. Transmission of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae in New Zealand healthcare facilities In 2016 there were two probable CPE cross-transmission events in New Zealand healthcare facilities. The same patient, originally identified in 2015 with K. pneumoniae with OXA-232 following hospitalisation in India, was the apparent index case in both cross-transmission events. The first event was in Middlemore Hospital where the index case was on the same ward as another patient who had not been overseas and from whom the same CPE strain was isolated. The second event occurred in an Auckland long-term care facility where the index case lived and the same CPE strain was isolated from another resident who had not been overseas (see Table 2, footnote 6). 5

Table 2. Probable place of acquisition of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, 2016 Number of isolates 1 Carbapenemase type and subtype Probable region of acquisition India Other parts of Asia 2 Europe Middle East New Zealand Unknown 3 Total KPC 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 KPC-2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 NDM 23 2 1 0 3 2 31 NDM-1 8 1 0 0 1 4 0 10 NDM-4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 NDM-5 14 1 1 0 2 2 5 20 NDM-7 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 IMP 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 IMP-4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 IMP-8 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 OXA-48-like 7 0 0 1 3 2 13 OXA-48 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OXA-162 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 OXA-181 4 0 0 0 1 1 5 6 OXA-232 3 0 0 0 2 6 0 5 Total 27 7 3 1 1 8 5 45 7 Footnotes on next page 6

Footnotes for Table 2: 1 Includes multiple isolates from six patients who had 2 distinct carbapenemase-producing isolates (see Table 1, footnote 3). Five of these six patients had been hospitalised in India and the sixth patient had both been in India and been hospitalised in China. 2 All Asia other than the Indian subcontinent. 3 Unknown includes both when the information was not reported for the patient (n=3 isolates) and when the patient had been in multiple countries (one patient with 2 isolates, see footnote 5 below). 4 The patient had a family contact that had recently been in India. 5 The patient with one of the isolates with NDM-5 carbapenemase and one of the isolates with OXA-181 carbapenemase had both been in India and been hospitalised in China. 6 One of these two isolates with OXA-232 was probably acquired in Middlemore Hospital, where the patient was in the same ward as another patient known to be colonised with the same CPE strain. The second isolate with OXA-232 was probably acquired in an Auckland long-term care facility, where the patient lived with another resident known to be colonised with the same CPE strain. 7 All four CPE isolates that had more than one type of carbapenemase gene (two E. coli with NDM-1 + OXA-181, one K. pneumoniae with NDM-5 + OXA-232, and one E. coli with NDM-4 + NDM-7) were from patients who had been in India. Therefore a total of 30 carbapenemases of different classes were identified among the total 27 CPE isolates from patients that had likely acquired their CPE in India, and a total of 48 carbapenemases of different classes were identified among the total 45 CPE isolates. 7