Proposal Writing. Lynda Burton, ScD Johns Hopkins University

Similar documents
Health Issues for Aging Populations

Section B. Variability in the Normal Distribution: Calculating Normal Scores

Confounding and Effect Modification. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Comparing Proportions between Two Independent Populations. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Section D. Another Non-Randomized Study Design: The Case-Control Design

Section F. Measures of Association: Risk Difference, Relative Risk, and the Odds Ratio

Study Designs. Lecture 3. Kevin Frick

Comparing Means among Two (or More) Independent Populations. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Section C. Sample Size Determination for Comparing Two Proportions

Evaluation and Assessment of Health Policy. Gerard F. Anderson, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Statistics for Psychosocial Research Lecturer: William Eaton

Justice in Research Ethics: International Issues. Nancy E. Kass, ScD Johns Hopkins University

The Impact of Pandemic Influenza on Public Health

Economic Evaluation. Introduction to Economic Evaluation

Describing Data: Part I. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Section G. Comparing Means between More than Two Independent Populations

STD Epidemiology. Jonathan Zenilman, MD Johns Hopkins University

TRANSLATING RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE

Costing in Vaccine Planning and Programming

Experimental design. Basic principles

[Source: Freedman, Pisani, Purves (1998) Statistics, 3rd ed., Ch 2.]

Monitoring and Evaluation IN ACTION! Duff Gillespie

Including Health Economics in Your Specific Aims and Approach

Economic Evaluation. Defining the Scope of a Costeffectiveness

Section H. Case Study: Risk Assessment Issues Associated with Chloroform

Epidemiology of Diarrheal Diseases. Robert Black, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins University

Severe Mental Disorders. Etheldreda Nakimuli-Mpungu, MMed (Psych), MBChB Johns Hopkins University

Measurement of Psychopathology in Populations. William W. Eaton, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Section B. Self-Regulation, Attention, and Problem Solving

Alcohol. Gordon Smith, MD (MB, ChB Otago), MPH Professor University of Maryland National Study Center for Trauma and EMS

STI Prevention: Housekeeping and How We Use Public Health. M. Terry Hogan, MPH Johns Hopkins University

Request for Proposals

How to Choose the Wrong Model. Scott L. Zeger Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School

Proteins and Amino Acids. Benjamin Caballero, MD, PhD Johns Hopkins University

The Nutrition Transition

Changing People s Behavior. Larry Wissow Professor Health, Behavior and Society Johns Hopkins School of Public Health

Measure #402: Tobacco Use and Help with Quitting Among Adolescents National Quality Strategy Domain: Community / Population Health

Comparing Proportions between Two Independent Populations. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Section D. Genes whose Mutation can lead to Initiation

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE

Social Capital. Ginny Tedrow. Health Behavior Change at the Individual, Household and Community Levels

Epidemiologic Methods for Evaluating Screening Programs. Rosa M. Crum, MD, MHS Johns Hopkins University

Section C. Biomarkers of Early Biological Effect and Altered Structure and Function

Epidemiology of Mood Disorders II: Analytic Epidemiology and the Search for Etiologic Clues. William W. Eaton, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Michael J. McQuestion, PhD, MPH Johns Hopkins University. Measurement Concepts and Introduction to Problem Solving

Defining Mental Disorders. Judy Bass, MPH, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Critical Analysis of Popular Diets and Supplements

Meanings of medications, metonymy. Peter Winch. Health Behavior Change at the Individual, Household and Community Levels

Introduction, Nosology, and History. William W. Eaton, PhD Johns Hopkins University

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

DENOMINATOR: All patients undergoing anterior or apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery

PRELIMINARY EXAM EVALUATION FACULTY SCORE SHEET

En & IH Engineering Aspects of Public Health Crises. Quiz 1

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Outcome

State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Permanent Administrative Regulations

Lecture 3: Digestion and Dieting Physiology

TB Epidemiology. Richard E. Chaisson, MD Johns Hopkins University Center for Tuberculosis Research

The Research Roadmap Checklist

Flexibility and Informed Consent Process

CRIMINAL JUSTICE (CRIMLJUS)

Performance Improvement Project Implementation & Submission Tool

Research Design. Source: John W. Creswell RESEARCH DESIGN. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Third Edition

Infectious Disease Bureau Ryan White Services Division. Request For Proposal. Ryan White Services Division Consultant

Salt Iodization in Haiti: Challenges to Improving Salt Production Quality and Recommendations for Pursuing Iodization

Measurement. Different terminology. Marketing managers work with abstractions. Different terminology. Different terminology.

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Appendix A Gerontology Core Competencies

NIH NEW CLINICAL TRIAL REQUIREMENTS AND FORMS-E

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS 3000 ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS OTHER THAN AUDITS OR REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTENTS

Sample Evaluation Plan. Indicator 4.1.1

Breast Cancer Basics. Clinical Oncology for Public Health Professionals. Ben Ho Park, MD, PhD

New Drug Targets. Sean T. Prigge, PhD

Introduction. 1.1 Facets of Measurement

PSY 560 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Pediatrics Milestones and Meaningful Assessment Translating the Pediatrics Milestones into Assessment Items for use in the Clinical Setting

UNDERSTANDING THEORETICAL & CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS

MODULE 3 APPRAISING EVIDENCE. Evidence-Informed Policy Making Training

Research Proposal Development. Saptawati Bardosono

Post Procedural Care

Pre-Employment Psychological Evaluation Guidelines

Invitation to Tender

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT TOOLS

PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO USE HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH

What Does a TOC Communicate?

BACHELOR S DEGREE IN SOCIAL WORK. YEAR 1 (60 ETCS) Fundamentals of Public and Private Law Sociology. Practicum I Introduction to Statistics

Funnelling Used to describe a process of narrowing down of focus within a literature review. So, the writer begins with a broad discussion providing b

Introduction to Household Surveys

Clinical Research Scientific Writing. K. A. Koram NMIMR

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Table of Contents. EHS EXERCISE 1: Risk Assessment: A Case Study of an Investigation of a Tuberculosis (TB) Outbreak in a Health Care Setting

Planning & Conducting an Exercise - An Interactive Workshop

Research Plan And Design

Societal case formulation Mark Burton (with additions by Carolyn Kagan) 2008

Societal case formulation Mark Burton

DENOMINATOR: All patients undergoing anterior or apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery

TOBACCO CONTROL PROGRAM COMMUNITY GRANT. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS- Release Date: October 2, 2018 Application Deadline: October 19, 2018 at 5:00 PM

Master Class: Fundamentals of Lung Cancer

Scaling up in Gender Analysis Workshop

Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Review of Historical Financial Statements

Transcription:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site. Copyright 2007, The Johns Hopkins University and Jonathan Weiner. All rights reserved. Use of these materials permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided AS IS ; no representations or warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed.

Proposal Writing Lynda Burton, ScD Johns Hopkins University

Abstracts What Is an Abstract? A brief summary (half a page) Include Background Objective of research or objectives of program being evaluated Study design Methods 3

Specific Aims of Study Main goal of the program what does your program intend to accomplish? Specific objectives that you will evaluate Or, what are the major research questions? What will be gained by the study? 4

Significance of the Study Justify the relevance of the research to science and/or Justify the relevance to policy or social welfare, and/or Why are the questions or issues important to public health? Where does the study fit in the HSRE framework? 5

Background of the Study (or Literature Review) What is already known about the issues or this type of program? What are the gaps in information? Describe previous relevant research How will answering this research question add to the knowledge base? How will a positive program evaluation contribute to public policy? 6

Hypotheses of a Research Proposal Provide a general focus to approaching the problem Is generated from the conceptual framework of the study Expresses some relationship among variables Is stated in a way that is testable Usually describes the stated direction of the relationship 7

Hypothesis of a Program Evaluation The program is effective in that it meets the established objectives Normally, in a program evaluation, this hypothesis is not stated 8

Methods 1. Research design 2. Study setting and population 3. Variables and measures 4. Sources of data 5. Timeline 9

Methods: Study Design Experimental Quasi-experimental Observation Give Campbell and Stanley notation of the design Describe number of observations 10

Methods: Study Setting Population to be studied Clinic population Community-dwelling Demographics Criteria for inclusion in numerator or denominator Describe sampling frames and possible randomization 11

Methods: Variables and Measures Independent, dependent, intervening Constructs, definitions, and instruments to derive measures Theoretical model describing relationship of variables 12

Methods: Sources of Data Primary or secondary data? (or combination?) What data will be used to derive each variable? How will data be collected? (interview, mail-in survey? medical record abstracting?) Identify survey instrument to be used 13

Methods: Analytic Approach What will you do with the data you collect? Make comparisons with chi square or t-tests Plan to carry out multivariate analysis What analysis will be used to assess reliability and validity of measures? Power calculations to determine sample size 14

Methods: Timelines Develop task list Lay out tasks along time continuum Develop milestones or deliverables Describe who will perform which tasks Organizational chart (if large study team) 15

Methods: Ethical Considerations Informed Consent What is the purpose of the study? Why was subject chosen for the study? What are the potential risks and benefits? Present health care will not be jeopardized by refusing to participate Can withdraw at any time 16

Methods: Other Considerations Logistics Qualifications of the research team Organizational resources Budget and other resource requirements Personnel Supplies, equipment Computer time Travel 17

Methods: Limitations of Study Consider all Campbell and Stanley threats to internal validity Consider all threats to external validity What are the limitations related to measures? What are the limitations due to populations? 18

Summary Overview of study Highlight methodological uniqueness if any Why should this study be done? What will it add to science? What will it provide to the agency paying for the study? Highlight why the proposed research team is the right one to do this project 19