AOANJRR Automated Industry Report Depuy Synthes Australia Attune PS Total Knee Data Period: 1 September August 2018

Similar documents
Automated Industry Report 824 Depuy Synthes Australia Attune PS Total Knee

Automated Industry Report 823 Depuy Synthes Australia Attune CR Total Knee

Scorpio NRG PS (cementless)/series 7000 (cementless) Total Knee Investigation

National Joint Replacement Registry. Outcomes of Classes No Longer Used Hip and Knee Arthroplasty SUPPLEMENTARY

2016 CELEBRATING 15 YEARS OF DATA REPORT NATIONAL JOINT REPLACEMENT REGISTRY. Outcomes of Classes No Longer Used Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

DePuy Attune CR and Attune PS. Contents Recorded Usage in NJR Patient and Procedure Details Revision and Survivorship APPENDIX A Component List

DePuy Attune CR and Attune PS. Contents Recorded Usage in NJR Patient and Procedure Details Revision and Survivorship APPENDIX A Component List

DePuy Attune CR and Attune PS

PRIMARY. ConforMIS itotal G2 XE and itotal G2 (Bicondylar tray)

2016 CELEBRATING 15 YEARS OF DATA REPORT NATIONAL JOINT REPLACEMENT REGISTRY. Metal and Ceramic Bearing Surface in Total Conventional Hip Arthroplasty

National Joint Replacement Registry. Metal and Ceramic Bearing Surface in Total Conventional Hip Arthroplasty

National Joint Replacement Registry. Demographics and Outcome of Ankle Arthroplasty SUPPLEMENTARY

Appendix E-1 (Figures and Tables) Fig. E-1

DePuy Corail Collared vs. Collarless (ex MoM)

Produced on: Licenced for use until: Corail Stem (Standard Offset Collared)

Produced on: Licenced for use until: Corail Stem (Standard Offset Non-Collared)

Smith & Nephew. Polarstem Cementless

Smith & Nephew. R3 Cementless Cup

An Optimum Prosthesis Combination of Low Risk TKR Options in All Five Primary Categories of Design Results in a 60% Reduction in Revision Risk

National Joint Replacement Registry. Lay Summary 2015 Annual Report Hip and Knee Replacement

Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: One mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing

CLINICAL AND OPERATIVE APPROACH FOR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT DR.VINMAIE ORTHOPAEDICS PG 2 ND YEAR

CONSENSUS ORTHOPEDICS INC. CONSENSUS KNEE SYSTEM

Total Knee Replacement

Unicondylar Knee Vs Total Knee Replacement: Is Less Better In the Middle Aged Athlete

Knee Revision. Portfolio

Knee arthroplasty: What radiologists should know.

THE KNEE SOCIETY VIRTUAL FELLOWSHIP

Insert dissociation after fixed bearing PS constrained Genesis II total knee arthroplasty. A case series of nine patients

Knee Replacement Complications

Biomechanics of. Knee Replacement. Mujda Hakime, Paul Malcolm

JOINT RULER. Surgical Technique For Knee Joint JRReplacement

REVISION. Zimmer Biomet All Trabecular Metal Cups vs. All non-tm cementless cups

CMA TM Cemented Modular Augmentable. Baseplate. 2 Knee

YOU MAY NEED A KNEE REPLACEMENT

Online Orthopaedics Online Orthopaedics

Orthopaedic Knee (and Anatomical Leg (below knee)) Referra Guidelines

YOUR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

ESC. Enhanced Stability Liners. Design Rationale & Surgical Technique

Partial Knee Replacement

Oxford. Partial Knee

Case report. Open Access. Abstract

Knee Replacement Implants

Contemporary Advances in Hip, Knee, and Shoulder Arthroplasty April 11, 2015

PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

Selected Issues in Nonneoplastic. Orthopaedic Pathology. Diseases of Diarthrodial Joints and their Complications

Operations included in the National Joint Registry (NJR) Quick links, go to: Hips > Knees > Ankles > Elbows > Shoulders > Trauma >

Contents SECTION 1: GENERAL TRAUMA AND RECONSTRUCTIVE HIP SURGERY

THE ATTUNE REVISION ROTATING PLATFORM KNEE SYSTEM

ATTUNE KNEE SYSTEM: SOFCAM CONTACT

Section of total knee replacement. Total Knee Replacement System. Knieendoprothesen System. Système de prothèse totale de genou

EARLY CLINICAL RESULTS OF PRIMARY CEMENTLESS TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

CEC ARTICLE: Special Medical Conditions Part 3: Hip and Knee Replacement C. Eggers

Greater Component Accuracy...

Instructions for use for ADLER Cemented Bipolar hemi-arthroplasty Prosthesis

Orthopaedics What s New in 2015 What Really Works in Orthopaedics: Does Advertising Change our Practice

Orthopaedics Business. Dave Illingworth, President February

Bicruciate-Retaining or Medial Pivot Total Knee Prosthesis Pritchett 225 Fig. 3. The MP total knee prosthesis. Fig. 1. An anteroposterior radiograph o

THE P.F.C. SIGMA FEMORAL ADAPTER. Surgical Technique

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine (January 2019) Vol. 74 (7), Page

Progeny Hip Stem. Surgical Protocol and Product Specifications

American Joint Replacement Registry. Jeffrey P. Knezovich, CAE Executive Director ---- Caryn D. Etkin, PhD, MPH Director of Analytics

Patellar Fractures After Total Knee Replacement

H.P. Teng, Y.J. Chou, L.C. Lin, and C.Y. Wong Under general or spinal anesthesia, the knee was flexed gently. In the cases of limited ROM, gentle and

National Joint Registry for England and Wales 3rd Annual Clinical Report

THE ATTUNE REVISION FIXED BEARING KNEE SYSTEM

Saiph Knee System. Technical Dossier

DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH

15-Year Follow-up Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Gender Solutions Patello-Femoral Joint System

For Commercial products, please refer to the following policy: Preauthorization via Web-Based Tool for Procedures

GENESIS II/ LEGION Total Knee System

TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

Optimum implant geometry

Complications of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Why precision is powerful

Original Date: December 2015 Page 1 of 8 FOR CMS (MEDICARE) MEMBERS ONLY

Shoulder Joint Replacement

Consistency in U2 Knee System over Time

Total Hip Replacement

Pathological plain-film findings related to patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement

Common Shoulder Problems and Treatment Options. Benjamin W. Szerlip D.O. Austin Shoulder Institute

Knee Failure Mechanisms After Total Knee Arthroplasty

The Japanese Society For Replacement Arthroplasty The Japan Arthroplasty Register 2017/3/31

TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT:

SEVERE VARUS AND VALGUS DEFORMITIES TREATED BY TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Why do I perform PFP? Fernando Fonseca, MD PhD Head of Department Orthopaedics

Condylar constrained system in primary total knee replacement: our experience and literature review

A Summary of Knee Recalls Consumers Union Safe Patient Project September 9, 2013

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Regenerex Primary Tibial Tray

Rotating Platform. stabilityinmotion

Modularity in tibial components for total knee

Enhanced Stability Constrained Liners. Design Rationale Surgical Technique

Tibial Base Design Factors Affecting Tibial Coverage After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Symmetric Versus Asymmetric Bases

Important notice: the device(s) can be prescribed and implanted only by a doctor legally authorized to perform this type of surgery.

THE KNEE SOCIETY VIRTUAL FELLOWSHIP

Operations included in the National Joint Registry (NJR)

Patellofemoral Replacement

SPECT/CT Imaging. Knee & Hip Prosthesis

Transcription:

AOANJRR Automated Industry Report 335 - Depuy Synthes Australia Total Knee Catalogue Numbers of Femoral Components included in this analysis Model Catalogue Range Range Description No. of Primary Procedures 150410101-150410210 PS Femoral Component 3594 150410123-150410226 PS Narrow Femoral Component 1093 Page 1 of 13

Table 1: Revision Rates of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Femoral Catalogue Number Range (All Diagnoses) Femoral Range N Revised N Total Obs. Years 150410101-150410210 31 3594 7446 0.42 (0.28, 0.59) 150410123-150410226 16 1093 2238 0.71 (0.41, 1.16) TOTAL 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) Page 2 of 13

Table 2: Implant Usage of in Primary Total Knee Replacement (All Diagnoses) N Implant Usage Date First Used 13 March 2013 Date Last Used 1 August 2018 N Procedures 4687 N Patients 4046 N Hospitals Implanting 90 N Surgeons Implanting* 126 Outcome N Revised 47 N Deceased** 58 *320 procedures have unknown surgeon **'N Deceased' does not include patient deaths that occurred after the implant was revised Table 3: Follow Up Years of Primary Total Knee Replacement (All Diagnoses) Model N Minimum Maximum Median Mean Std Dev 4687 0.04 5.43 1.86 2.07 1.28 TOTAL 4687 0.04 5.43 1.86 2.07 1.28 Page 3 of 13

Table 4: Age and Gender of Primary Total Knee Replacement (All Diagnoses) Gender Number Percent Minimum Maximum Median Mean Std Dev Male 1964 41.9% 35 92 69 68.6 9.1 Female 2723 58.1% 33 97 69 68.9 9.4 TOTAL 4687 100.0% 33 97 69 68.8 9.3 Table 5: Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model and Age (All Diagnoses) Age N Col% N Col% <55 327 7.0 42721 6.8 55-64 1133 24.2 165141 26.4 65-74 1890 40.3 245062 39.1 75 1337 28.5 173490 27.7 TOTAL 4687 100.0 626414 100.0 Table 6: Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model and Gender (All Diagnoses) Gender N Col% N Col% Male 1964 41.9 271858 43.4 Female 2723 58.1 354556 56.6 TOTAL 4687 100.0 626414 100.0 Page 4 of 13

Table 7: Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model and ASA Grade (All Diagnoses) ASA Grade N Col% N Col% 1 237 5.1 15803 6.1 2 2524 54.7 144510 55.8 3 1798 39.0 95672 37.0 4 53 1.1 2852 1.1 5 1 0.0 15 0.0 TOTAL 4613 100.0 258852 100.0 Note: The AOANJRR commenced collection of ASA data in 2013. 74 procedures with no ASA Grade recorded are excluded from this table Table 8: Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model and BMI (All Diagnoses) BMI N Col% N Col% Underweight (<18.50) 8 0.2 353 0.2 Normal (18.50-24.99) 388 12.1 17509 10.4 Pre Obese (25.00-29.99) 1045 32.5 52384 31.2 Obese Class 1 (30.00-34.99) 935 29.1 51421 30.6 Obese Class 2 (35.00-39.99) 499 15.5 28518 17.0 Obese Class 3 ( 40.00) 336 10.5 17808 10.6 TOTAL 3211 100.0 167993 100.0 Note: The AOANJRR commenced collection of BMI data in 2015. 1476 procedures with no BMI recorded are excluded from this table Table 9: Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model and Primary Diagnosis Primary Diagnosis N Col% N Col% Osteoarthritis 4605 98.3 611684 97.6 Rheumatoid Arthritis 51 1.1 8216 1.3 Other Inflammatory Arthritis 16 0.3 3129 0.5 Osteonecrosis 13 0.3 1993 0.3 Tumour.. 777 0.1 Fracture 1 0.0 416 0.1 Chondrocalcinosis.. 18 0.0 Osteochondritis Dissecans.. 2 0.0 Other 1 0.0 179 0.0 TOTAL 4687 100.0 626414 100.0 Page 5 of 13

Table 10: Revision Rates of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model (All Diagnoses) Model N Revised N Total Obs. Years 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) 24050 626414 3922199 0.61 (0.61, 0.62) TOTAL 24097 631101 3931882 0.61 (0.61, 0.62) Table 11: Yearly Cumulative Percent Revision of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model (All Diagnoses) CPR 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs 4 Yrs 5 Yrs 0.7 (0.5, 0.9) 1.0 (0.8, 1.4) 1.3 (1.0, 1.8) 1.5 (1.1, 2.1) 1.5 (1.1, 2.1) 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 2.0 (2.0, 2.1) 2.7 (2.6, 2.7) 3.1 (3.1, 3.2) 3.5 (3.5, 3.6) CPR 6 Yrs 7 Yrs 8 Yrs 9 Yrs 10 Yrs 3.9 (3.8, 4.0) 4.2 (4.2, 4.3) 4.6 (4.5, 4.6) 4.9 (4.9, 5.0) 5.2 (5.2, 5.3) CPR 11 Yrs 12 Yrs 13 Yrs 14 Yrs 15 Yrs 16 Yrs 5.6 (5.6, 5.7) 6.0 (5.9, 6.1) 6.4 (6.3, 6.5) 6.8 (6.7, 6.9) 7.2 (7.1, 7.4) 7.7 (7.5, 7.8) Figure 1: Cumulative Percent Revision of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model (All Diagnoses) 12% 10% HR - adjusted for age and gender vs Entire Period: HR=0.54 (0.40, 0.72),p<0.001 Cumulative Percent Revision 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Number at Risk 0 YrYears Since 1 Primary Yr Procedure 2 Yrs 3 Yrs 4 Yrs 5 Yrs 6 Yrs 7 Yrs 4687 3501 2195 1238 347 62 0 0 626414 568771 505643 446440 391119 339234 290891 245575 Number at Risk 8 Yrs 9 Yrs 10 Yrs 11 Yrs 12 Yrs 13 Yrs 14 Yrs 15 Yrs 16 Yrs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 203794 165924 133204 103994 79071 57688 39539 24885 13271 Page 6 of 13

TABLE 12 Reasons for Revision This is reported in two ways: a percentage of primary procedures revised and as a percentage of all revision procedures. % Primaries Revised: This shows the proportional contribution of each revision diagnosis as a percentage of the total number of primary procedures. This percentage can be used to approximate the risk of being revised for that diagnosis. Differing percentages between groups, with the same distribution of follow up time, may identify problems of concern. % Revisions: The number of revisions for each diagnosis is expressed as a percentage of the total number of revisions. This shows the distribution of reasons for revision within a group but cannot be used as a comparison between groups. Table 12: Revision Diagnosis of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model (All Diagnoses) (Follow-up Limited to 5.4 Years) Revision Diagnosis Number % Primaries Revised % Revisions Number % Primaries Revised % Revisions Infection 21 0.4 44.7 4894 0.8 25.9 Loosening 9 0.2 19.1 4431 0.7 23.5 Patellofemoral Pain 1 0.0 2.1 2008 0.3 10.6 Pain 1 0.0 2.1 1641 0.3 8.7 Instability 7 0.1 14.9 1510 0.2 8.0 Patella Erosion 914 0.1 4.8 Arthrofibrosis 2 0.0 4.3 766 0.1 4.1 Fracture 2 0.0 4.3 518 0.1 2.7 Malalignment 1 0.0 2.1 448 0.1 2.4 Incorrect Sizing 259 0.0 1.4 Metal Related Pathology 257 0.0 1.4 Lysis 175 0.0 0.9 Patella Maltracking 154 0.0 0.8 Bearing Dislocation 148 0.0 0.8 Wear Tibial Insert 139 0.0 0.7 Implant Breakage Patella 86 0.0 0.5 Implant Breakage Tibial Insert 64 0.0 0.3 Synovitis 62 0.0 0.3 Prosthesis Dislocation 55 0.0 0.3 Osteonecrosis 43 0.0 0.2 Implant Breakage Tibial 33 0.0 0.2 Implant Breakage Femoral 2 0.0 4.3 23 0.0 0.1 Tumour 16 0.0 0.1 Wear Patella 14 0.0 0.1 Wear Tibial 5 0.0 0.0 Heterotopic Bone 4 0.0 0.0 Incorrect Side 2 0.0 0.0 Wear Femoral 2 0.0 0.0 Patella Dislocation 1 0.0 0.0 Other 1 0.0 2.1 199 0.0 1.1 N Revision 47 1.0 100.0 18871 3.0 100.0 N Primary 4687 626414 Note: This table is restricted to revisions within 5.4 years for all groups to allow a time-matched comparison of revisions. Page 7 of 13

Table 13: Yearly Cumulative Incidence Revision Diagnosis of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model (All Diagnoses) Model Event N Events 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 10 Yrs 15 Yrs Infection 21 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) 0.6 (0.3, 0.8) 0.6 (0.3, 0.8) 0.6 (0.3, 0.8) Loosening 9 0.1 (0.0, 0.2) 0.1 (0.1, 0.3) 0.2 (0.1, 0.5) 0.5 (0.2, 0.9) Instability 7 0.2 (0.1, 0.3) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) Arthrofibrosis 2 0.0 (0.0, 0.1) 0.1 (0.0, 0.2) 0.1 (0.0, 0.2) 0.1 (0.0, 0.2) Fracture 2 0.0 (0.0, 0.2) 0.0 (0.0, 0.2) 0.0 (0.0, 0.2) 0.0 (0.0, 0.2) Other 6 0.1 (0.0, 0.2) 0.1 (0.0, 0.2) 0.2 (0.1, 0.5) 0.2 (0.1, 0.5) Deceased 58 0.4 (0.2, 0.6) 1.4 (1.0, 1.9) 1.8 (1.3, 2.3) 2.8 (1.8, 4.3) All Revision 47 0.7 (0.4, 0.9) 1.0 (0.8, 1.4) 1.3 (0.9, 1.7) 1.5 (1.1, 2.1) Infection 5598 0.4 (0.4, 0.4) 0.6 (0.6, 0.6) 0.7 (0.7, 0.7) 0.9 (0.8, 0.9) 1.1 (1.1, 1.1) 1.2 (1.2, 1.3) Loosening 6058 0.2 (0.2, 0.2) 0.4 (0.4, 0.4) 0.6 (0.6, 0.6) 0.8 (0.8, 0.9) 1.3 (1.2, 1.3) 1.8 (1.7, 1.8) Instability 1888 0.1 (0.1, 0.1) 0.2 (0.1, 0.2) 0.2 (0.2, 0.2) 0.3 (0.3, 0.3) 0.4 (0.4, 0.4) 0.5 (0.5, 0.5) Arthrofibrosis 836 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.1 (0.1, 0.1) 0.1 (0.1, 0.1) 0.1 (0.1, 0.2) 0.2 (0.2, 0.2) 0.2 (0.2, 0.2) Fracture 737 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.1 (0.1, 0.1) 0.1 (0.1, 0.1) 0.1 (0.1, 0.1) 0.1 (0.1, 0.2) 0.2 (0.2, 0.2) Other 8933 0.3 (0.3, 0.3) 0.7 (0.6, 0.7) 0.9 (0.9, 1.0) 1.3 (1.2, 1.3) 1.9 (1.8, 1.9) 2.5 (2.4, 2.5) Deceased 85460 0.7 (0.7, 0.8) 1.8 (1.7, 1.8) 3.0 (3.0, 3.1) 6.5 (6.4, 6.6) 20.0 (19.8, 20.1) 36.5 (36.2, 36.8) All Revision 24050 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) 2.6 (2.6, 2.7) 3.5 (3.4, 3.5) 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) 6.3 (6.2, 6.5) Page 8 of 13

Figure 2: Cumulative Incidence Revision Diagnosis of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model (All Diagnoses) Cumulative Incidence 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% Infection Loosening Instability Arthrofibrosis Fracture Cumulative Incidence 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% Infection Loosening Instability Arthrofibrosis Fracture 1.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Years Since Primary Procedure Years Since Primary Procedure Page 9 of 13

TABLE 14 Type of Revision This is reported in two ways: a percentage of primary procedures revised and as a percentage of all revision procedures. % Primaries Revised: This shows the proportional contribution of each type of revision as a percentage of the total number of primary procedures. This percentage can be used to approximate the risk of having that type of revision. Differing percentages between groups, with the same distribution of follow up time, may identify problems of concern. % Revisions: The number of revisions for each type of revision is expressed as a percentage of the total number of revisions. This shows the distribution of types of revision within a group but cannot be used as a comparison between groups. Table 14: Type of Revision of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Model (All Diagnoses) (Follow-up Limited to 5.4 Years) Type of Revision Number % Primaries Revised % Revisions Number % Primaries Revised % Revisions Insert Only 25 0.5 53.2 4661 0.7 24.7 TKR (Tibial/Femoral) 12 0.3 25.5 4231 0.7 22.4 Patella Only 1 0.0 2.1 4001 0.6 21.2 Tibial Component 2 0.0 4.3 1849 0.3 9.8 Insert/Patella 1561 0.2 8.3 Femoral Component 3 0.1 6.4 1238 0.2 6.6 Cement Spacer 3 0.1 6.4 1130 0.2 6.0 Removal of Prostheses 123 0.0 0.7 Minor Components 1 0.0 2.1 47 0.0 0.2 Total Femoral 11 0.0 0.1 Cement Only 10 0.0 0.1 Reinsertion of Components 9 0.0 0.0 N Revision 47 1.0 100.0 18871 3.0 100.0 N Primary 4687 626414 Note: This table is restricted to revisions within 5.4 years for all groups to allow a time-matched comparison of revisions. Page 10 of 13

Table 15: Revision Rates of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Fixation (All Diagnoses) Fixation N Revised N Total Obs. Years Cemented 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) TOTAL 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) Table 16: Revision Rates of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Polyethylene Type (All Diagnoses) Polyethylene Type N Revised N Total Obs. Years XLPE + Antioxidant 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) TOTAL 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) Table 17: Revision Rates of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Bearing Mobility (All Diagnoses) Bearing Mobility N Revised N Total Obs. Years Fixed 32 2910 6431 0.50 (0.34, 0.70) Rotating 15 1777 3252 0.46 (0.26, 0.76) TOTAL 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) Table 18: Revision Rates of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Patella Usage (All Diagnoses) Patella Usage N Revised N Total Obs. Years Patella Used 42 4383 8930 0.47 (0.34, 0.64) No Patella 5 304 753 0.66 (0.22, 1.55) TOTAL 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) Page 11 of 13

Table 19: Number of Revisions of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Year of Implant (All Diagnoses) Year of Implant Number Revised Total Number 2013 1 154 2014 7 564 2015 16 930 2016 9 1047 2017 12 1346 2018 2 646 TOTAL 47 4687 Page 12 of 13

Table 20: Revision Rates of Primary Total Knee Replacement by Tibial Component (All Diagnoses) Tibial N Revised N Total Obs. Years Attune 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) TOTAL 47 4687 9683 0.49 (0.36, 0.65) 098058-180831 DSUS/EM Page 13 of 13