MB Drought Plan and Strategies Data, Information and Assessment Needed

Similar documents
Mohammad Amin Asadi Zarch et al.,2015

A Simple Regression Model for Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration in Various Types of Land Use, THAILAND

The Efficiency of Meteorological Drought Indices for Drought Monitoring and Evaluating in Kohgilouye and Boyerahmad Province, Iran

NILE RIVER WATER RESOURCES ANALYSIS

Quality. western Canadian Canola 2017 ISSN Véronique J. Barthet Oilseeds Program Manager. Contact: Véronique J. Barthet

Quality of western Canadian mustard 2008

Quality. western Canadian Canola 2016 ISSN Véronique J. Barthet Oilseeds Program Manager. Contact: Véronique J. Barthet

Quality of western Canadian Canola 2014

NORTH DAKOTA 2011 FLOOD EVENT

Mapping Population & Climate Change: Malawi. Malawi - Unmet Need for Family Planning, 2010

western Canadian mustard 2003

Spatiotemporal Regime of Climate & Streamflow in the US Great Lakes Basin

Ana Iglesias, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid La economía de agua de riego 24 Septiembre 2008

Quality of western Canadian canola 2012

Don Pedro Project Project Operations/Water Balance Model Attachment B Model Description and User s Guide, Addendum 1 Base Case Description

Welcome. Recreational Enhancements on the Lehigh River Public Information Workshop 31 January 2008

Quality of western Canadian mustard 2016

Quality of the United States Soybean Crop: Dr. Seth Naeve, Dr. James Orf, Dr. Jill Miller-Garvin, and Mr. Nick Weidenbenner

Climate Change Impacts on Outbreak of Brown Plant Hopper in Vietnam and Options for Prevention

Going with the Flow Update. An update and comparative analysis of five years of Water Sentinels flow data collection of the Upper Verde River

PEACHLAND CREEK WATERSHED (Second Year of Snowline Data)

Cassava in the Philippines. Algerico M. Mariscal and Jose L. Bacusmo

Quality of western Canadian mustard 2017

Jim Woodruff Dam Section 7 Consultation. Hydrological Modeling Technical Workshop II 12 July 2006

PLANT-DRIVEN IRRIGATION FROM THE GROUND UP.

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs

FIDS Symposium The River Bender

Improving Management Of Soybean Cyst Nematode Through Extension Demonstration And Outreach

PERFORMANCE OF THOMAS FIERING MODEL FOR GENERATING SYNTHETIC STREAMFLOW OF JAKHAM RIVER

Massachusetts Arbovirus Surveillance and Response Plan

Nepal - Unmet Need for Family Planning,

SPOTTED BEAR RIVER PROJECT REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Sunflower Special Topics: Nutrient Requirements of Sunflower

FMEL Arboviral Epidemic Risk Assessment: Fourth Update for 2010 Week 22 (May 31, 2010)

An integrated approach to understanding knowledge, attitudes and practices surrounding dengue in emergent and endemic areas

Quality of western Canadian mustard 2012

Global Climate Change and Mosquito-Borne Diseases

Daily Pollen Levels and. Room Visits/ in California

2006 RALSTON AFTERBAY WATER TEMPERATURE INVESTIGATION STUDY REPORT

Preliminary Results of Modelling Radionuclide Depositions in Agricultural and Forest Environments Using the CHERPAC Code

National Seed Health System

Nutritional requirements

Burt Bluhm Department of Plant Pathology University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Predicting Potential Grain Protein Content of Spring Wheat with in-season Hand-Held Optical Sensors.

A MODIFIED EXTENDED COLUMN TEST TO REDUCE SLAB DEGRADATION: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Overview of State and Federal Water Law. Jennifer Gimbel Colorado Water Institute

fraction (soluble sugars, starch and total NSC). Conditional and marginal R 2 values are given for

Hydrologic Modeling Workshop. HEC-5 Modeling of ACF Interim Operation by Mobile District

Air Quality and the Demand for Health Services in New Hampshire

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SOYBEAN QUALITY

1

The short path seepage area is between the dam embankment and the bend in the existing drainage tunnel. This area is highlighted in red on the

Drivers of Infectious Disease: Connections Matter

Translated version CONTINGENCY PLAN DENGUE FEVER PREVENTION AND RESPONSE IN HOCHIMINH CITY IN 2012

104 Trop Anim Prod :2

2011 VERMONT ORGANIC CORN SILAGE VARIETY TRIAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

Trends in Micro-Nutrient Soil Test Levels in Saskatchewan Pat Flaten, PAg 1, Brandon Green, PAg 2, Paul Routledge, PAg 3

Common Guidance for the Interpretation & Identification of High Conservation Values. 1 July, 2013 Santiago

Enhancing Forages with Nutrient Dense Sprays 2013 Trials

Parasites on the Half Shell

Management of Flea Beetles in the Canadian Prairies. Alejandro Costamagna Department of Entomology

Welcome. Recreational Enhancements on the Lehigh River Public Information Workshop 18 February 2010

Dodge County Drainage Board

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum

Decision support framework for managing RVF in the Horn of Africa

Volume XII, Number 14 August 6, Late Blight Management in the Columbia Basin. Updates on Potato Psyllid and Zebra Chip (ZC)

U.S. cases per year (Rose et al. 2000)

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF GASTROINTESTINAL ILLNESS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH PRECIPITATION ACROSS THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

DESERTNET MONITORING AND ACTIONS TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN EUROPEAN REGION. Región de Murcia. Spain. Dra. Carmen Pérez Sirvent

FMEL Arboviral Epidemic Risk Assessment: Seventh Update for 2010 Week 36 (September 09, 2010)

Manitoba Weekly West Nile virus Surveillance Report

The European Environment State and Outlook 2015 Progress Update - September

Surveillance and early warning systems for climate sensitive diseases in Vietnam and Laos

NATIONAL PLAN OF ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN BURKINA FASO

Francis E. Walter Reservoir Recreation Operations Plan for 2019

Predicting NuSun Hybrid Oleic Acid Concentration Through Early Sampling. J. F. Miller, D. A. Rehder, and B. A. Vick

on the Lehigh River Public Information Workshop

LAKE NAIVASHA. A Lake in Trouble. A Possible Solution?

SATELLITE-BASED REAL TIME & EARLY WARNING SYSTEM for MONITORING VECTOR BORNE DISEASES

Aflatoxins in Ethiopia. Alemayehu Chala (PhD, Hawassa University) Usha Kulkarni (PhD, Mekelle University)

HYDROGEOLOGIC DATA. REPORT FOR 2002

THE PROJECT OF PROMOTION ON VETIVER PLANTING ON UPPER WATERSHED AREAS WITH COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION

Possible climate change impact on occurrence of Aspergillus flavus on spelt wheat in Serbia

Flood Hydrology. for. Michigan Watercourses

IMPACT OF TRACE MINERAL VARIATION WITHIN FORAGES ON THE RATION FORMULATION PROCESS. J. R. Knapp Fox Hollow Consulting, LLC Columbus, Ohio INTRODUCTION

Agricultural Policies and Obesity: The Linkages Between Farm Commodities and Retail Food Products

Programme to promote Rainwater Harvesting in the Caribbean

Tina Brandt, Nora Olsen, Jeff Stark, Rich Novy, Jonathan Whitworth, and Sanjay Gupta. Storage Management of. Alpine Russet.

Enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizers: the What, When & Where. Tai McClellan Maaz Nitrogen Director, IPNI

NEBRASKA ARBOVIRUS SURVEILLANCE AND MOSQUITO MONITORING PROGRAM 2018 UPDATE #2

PROVINCIAL RISK MAPS FOR HIGHEST TENDENCY RANKING EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE DISEASES IN AYUTTHAYA PROVINCE, THAILAND

HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY PROJECT LEADERSHIP FORUM- CASE STUDY. Supporting the Marcellus Shale Boom

Assessment of the Economic Impacts of PEDv Swine Committee Meeting

The Hunger Games. Food Justice Relay Race

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Ecological Impact of Vetiver in Foreign Environments

Phase 6 Watershed Model: Prototype-I

International Journal of Advance Research, IJOAR.org ISSN

Technical Monograph n 17, 2nd Edition. Guidelines for Specifying the Shelf Life of Plant Protection Products

In what situations can Moringa oleifera help to improve nutrition?

Transcription:

MB Drought Plan and Strategies Data, Information and Assessment Needed Abul Kashem P.Eng. Surface Water Management Section Manitoba Water Stewardship EGO- DRI Workshop May 10 to 11, 2010

Outline Drought Management Plan Development Data, Information and Assessment Needs Research Needs Indicator Analysis Preliminary Observations 2

MB Drought Management Plan Development Conceptual Framework Definitions Indicator Selections Drought Action Plan and Strategies Water Supply and Demand Projection Climate Change Adaptation (with respect to drought) 3

Data, Information and Assessment needed Drought Indicators and Data Needs: Meteorological: Indicators: Percent of average/median precipitation, percentiles/deciles, Standard Precipitation Index (SPI)) Data: Precipitation Hydrological: Indicators: Percent of average/median flow, streamflow/ ground water(gw) percentiles/deciles, Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI), reservoir storage volume) Data: Streamflow/ snowpack, precipitation and reservoir storage, GW levels 4

Data, Information and Assessment needed Indicators and data needed: Agricultural Indicators: Palmer Drought Index (PDI), Crop Moisture Index (CMI), Normalized Vegetation index Data: temperature, precipitation, percent of water holding capacity, remote sensing data/images 5

Data, Information and Assessment needed Water Supply and Demand Prediction of water supply and demand (Short-, Medium- and Long-term) under expected economic growth and climate change: precipitation, temperature, stream flow, soil moisture, ground water levels, water uses (domestic, commercial, agricultural and industrial), reservoir operational rules, storages and basin information. 6

Research Need Development of Drought Indicators Soil moisture modelling Reservoir storage and operation indicators Projection of future water supply and demand (short-and long-term) for expected trend and climate change scenarios for each River Basin in Manitoba 7

Preliminary results for Indicator Map of selected precipitation stations (based on historical data availability) 8

Number of Events Number of Events Preliminary results for Indicator Historical Drought Indicator: % of Average 3 M onth Precipitation(Normal >80%, M oderate 80%-60%, Severe 60%- 40% and Extreme <40%) Winnipeg 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1895 1900 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Time(year) Precipitation Average Historical Drought Indicator: % of Median 3 Month Precipitation(Normal >80%, Moderate 80%-60%, Severe 60%-40% and Extreme <40%) Winnipeg 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1895 1905 1915 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 Time(year) Precipitation Median 9

Number of Events Number of Events Preliminary results for Indicator Historical Drought Indicator: % of Median 3 Month Precipitation(Normal >80%, Moderate 80%-60%, Severe 60%-40% and Extreme <40%) Winnipeg 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1895 1905 1915 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 Time(year) Precipitation Median Historical Drought (Indicator: 5-20-35th Percentiles Precipitation) (Normal >35th, Moderate 20-35th, Severe 5-20th and Extreme <5th Percentiles) Winnipeg 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1895 1900 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Time(year) 5-20-35th Percentile 10

Chances of Events(%) Chances of Events(%) Chances of Events(%) Preliminary results for Indicator 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Chances of Drought Events Winnipeg Drought Severity Indicator: % of Average 3 Month Precipitation(Normal >80%, Moderate 80%-60%, Severe 60%-40% and Extreme <40%) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Chances of Drought Events Winnipeg Drought Severity Precipitation Average 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Chances of Drought Events Winnipeg Drought Severity Indicator: Lowest 5-20-35th Percentile of Monthly Precipitation (Normal >35th, Moderate 20th-35th, Severe 5th- 20th and Extreme <5th Percentile) 5-20-35th Percentile Indicator: % of Median 3 Month Precipitation(Normal >80%, Moderate 80%-60%, Severe 60%-40% and Extreme <40%) Precipitation Median 11

Chances of Drought Events (% average) Preliminary results for Indicator Historical Drought Events Comparison, Manitoba 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Drought Severity Indicator: % of Average 1 Month Precipitation(Normal >80%, Moderate 80%-60%, Severe 60%-40% and Extreme <40%) Indicator: % of Median 1 Month Precipitation(Normal >80%, Moderate 80%-60%, Severe 60%-40% and Extreme <40%) Indicator: % of Average 3 Month Precipitation(Normal >80%, Moderate 80%-60%, Severe 60%-40% and Extreme <40%) Indicator: % of Median 3 Month Precipitation(Normal >80%, Moderate 80%-60%, Severe 60%-40% and Extreme <40%) Indicator:5-20-35th Percentile Monthly Precipitation(Normal >35th, Moderate 20th-35th, Severe 5th- 20th and Extreme <5th Percentiles) Average % of all selected stations 12

Preliminary observation for Precipitation Indicators % of Median of Monthly Precipitation Indicator give better results than % of Average of monthly Precipitation Indicator 5-20-35 th Percentile of monthly Precipitation Indicator gives better results than percent of average and median But the lowest percentile(5 th ) precipitation found as zero when a time series contain lots of Zero values which are very common on Precipitation Time Series. There is a chances of getting wrong signal about drought severity level. 13

Preliminary results for Flow Indicator Map of selected flow stations (based on historical data availability) 14

Number of Events Number of Events Preliminary results for Flow Indicator 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Historical Drought Indicator: % of Lowest Average Summer Month Flow (Normal > 70%, Spring-100%; Moderate: 50%- 70%,Spring- 70%-100%; Severe: 30%-50%, Spring- 50%-70% and Extreme <30%, Spring-<50%) Red River at Emerson 0 1912 1917 1922 1927 1932 1937 1942 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Time(year) Lowest Average Summer Month Flow Historical Drought Indicator: % of Lowest Median Historical Monthly Flow (Normal > 70%; Moderate: 50%-70%; Severe: 30%- 50%, and Extreme <30%) Red River at Emerson 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1912 1917 1922 1927 1932 1937 1942 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Time(year) Lowest Median Summer Month Flow 15

Number of Events Number of Events Preliminary results for Flow Indicator 14 12 Historical Drought Indicator: % of Lowest Median Historical Monthly Flow (Normal > 70%; Moderate: 50%-70%; Severe: 30%-50%, and Extreme <30%) Red River at Emerson 10 8 6 4 2 0 1912 1917 1922 1927 1932 1937 1942 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Time(year) Lowest Median of Monthly Flow Historical Drought Indicator:10-20-35th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >35th, Moderate 20th-35th, Severe 20th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Red River at Emerson 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1912 1917 1922 1927 1932 1937 1942 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Time(year) 10-20-35 th Percentiles of Monthly Flow 16

Chances of Events (%) Chances of Events (%) Chances of Events (%) Chances of Events (%) Preliminary results for Flow Indicator Chances of Drought Events (1912-2007) Red River at Emerson Chances of Drought Events (1912-2007) Red River at Emerson 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Drought Severity 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Drought Severity Indicator: % of Lowest Average Summer Month Flow (Normal > 70%, Spring-100%, Moderate: 50%-70%,Spring- 70%-100%; Severe: 30%-50%, Spring- 50%-70% and Extreme <30%, Spring-<50%) Lowest Average Summer Month Flow Chances of Drought Events (1913-2008) Red River at St. Agathe Indicator: % of Lowest Median Historical Monthly Flow (Normal > 70%; Moderate: 50%-70%; Severe: 30%-50%, and Extreme <30%) Lowest Median of Month Flow Chances of Drought Events (1912-2007) Red River at Emerson 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Drought Severity 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Drought Severity Indicator: % of Lowest Median Summer Month Flow (Normal > 70%, Spring-100%, Moderate: 50%-70%,Spring- 70%-100%; Severe: 30%- 50%, Spring- 50%-70% and Extreme <30%, Spring-<50%) Lowest Median Summer Month Flow Indicator:10-20-35th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >35th, Moderate 20th-35th, Severe 20th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) 17 10-20-35 th Percentiles of Monthly Flow

Chances of Events (%) Chances of Events (%) Preliminary results for Flow Indicator 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Historical Drought Events Comparison, Red River at Emerson (1912-2007) Indicator: Flow Average and Median Drought Severity Indicator: % of Low est Average Summer Month Flow (Normal > 70%, Spring-100%, Moderate: 50%-70%,Spring- 70%-100%; Severe: 30%-50%, Spring- 50%-70% and Extreme <30%, Spring- <50%)) Indicator: % of Low est Median Summer Month Flow (Normal > 70%, Spring-100%, Moderate: 50%-70%,Spring- 70%-100%; Severe: 30%-50%, Spring- 50%-70% and Extreme <30%, Spring- <50%)) Indicator: % of Low est Median Seasonal Flow (Normal > 70%, Spring-100%, Moderate: 50%-70%,Spring- 70%-100%; Severe: 30%-50%, Spring- 50%-70% and Extreme <30%, Spring-<50%)) Indicator: % of Low est Median Historical Monthly Flow (Normal > 70%, Spring-100%, Moderate: 50%-70%,Spring- 70%-100%; Severe: 30%-50%, Spring- 50%-70% and Extreme <30%, Spring- <50%)) Indicator: % of Low est Median Historical Monthly Flow (Normal > 70%; Moderate: 50%-70%; Severe: 30%-50%, and Extreme <30%) Indicator: % of Low est Median Historical Monthly Flow (Normal > 80%; Moderate: 50%-80%; Severe: 30%-50%, and Extreme <30%) Indicator: % of Low est Median Historical Monthly Flow (Normal > 80%; Moderate: 50%-80%; Severe: 20%-50%, and Extreme <20%) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Historical Drought Events Comparison, Red River at Emerson (1912-2007) Indicator: Flow Percentiles 0% Drought Severity Indicator:10-20-30th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >30th, Moderate 20th- 30th, Severe 10th- 20th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Indicator:10-20-35th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >35th, Moderate 20th-35th, Severe 20th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Indicator:10-20-40th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >40th, Moderate 20th-40th, Severe 20th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Indicator:10-20-45th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >45th, Moderate 20th- 45th, Severe 20th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Indicator:10-20-50th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >50th, Moderate 20th- 50th, Severe 20th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles Indicator:10-25-35th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >35th, Moderate 25th- 35th, Severe 25th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Indicator:10-25-40th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >40th, Moderate 25th- 40th, Severe 25th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Indicator:10-25-45th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >45th, Moderate 25th- 45th, Severe 25th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Indicator:10-25-50th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >50th, Moderate 25th- 50th, Severe 25th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Indicator:10-30-35th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >35th, Moderate 30th- 35th, Severe 30th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Indicator:10-30-40th Percentiles of Monthly Flow (Normal >40th, Moderate 30th- 40th, Severe 30th- 10th and Extreme <10th Percentiles) Comparison results of different indicator options for Red at Emerson 18

Preliminary observation for Flow Indicators % of Median of Monthly Flow Indicator gives better results than % of Average of monthly Precipitation Indicator 10-20-35 th Percentile of monthly Flow Indicator gives better results than percent of average and median. 19

Thanks