Importance of Food Safety for Consumer Protection and International Trade

Similar documents
50 YEARS CODEX ALIMENTARIUS SAFE, GOOD FOOD FOR EVERYONE

The Codex Alimentarius

Mary Frances Lowe U.S. Codex Office World Spices Congress Kochi, India February 16-19, 2014

The Codex Alimentarius Codes of Practices for livestock products and animal feeding

Joint FAO/WHO evaluation of the work of the Codex Alimentarius Commission

Risk Analysis and Science in Codex

Codex Alimentarius: Today and Tomorrow

Codex and international cooperation with the OIE

MEDICAL SCIENCES - Vol.II -The Need For an International Approach The Role of FAO and WHO - Jorgen Schlundt and Kazuaki Miyagishima

CODEX WORK RELATED TO FOOD SAFETY OF COFFEE

The SPS and TBT Agreements and International Standards (Agenda Item 5): Implication of SPS Agreement and relation to Codex standard

Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Lusaka, Zambia, 3-5 July 2002

CODEX and the European Union s food safety policy

Food Safety and the SPS Agreement. Dr Gerald G. Moy Manager, GEMS/Food Department of Food Safety World Health Organization

Codex Alimentarius and the US Dietary Supplement Industry. Mark A. Le Doux, Chairman and CEO Natural Alternatives International, Inc.

Maia Jack, Ph.D. CPGglobal, LLC 2013 Food Additives USDA FAS EMP: A Global Perspective on Safety Evaluation and Use

Maintaining Food Safety and Quality to ensure Consumer Safety

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

CHAPTER 2: RISK ANALYSIS

Codex and OIE Cooperation: a regional perspective

CURRICULUM VITAE. Ezzeddine Boutrif

codex alimentarius commission

Codex MRL Setting and Harmonization. Yukiko Yamada, Ph.D.

Risk Assessment : A Philippine Experience on Pesticides for Food Safety. Amelia W. Tejada

COMMENTS FROM SOUTH AFRICA

+ Agenda Items 2, 3 and 4 CRD 14 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME

DR. P. VINCENT HEGARTY

International Regulation-Intense Sweeteners

Using science to establish effective food safety control for the European Union Dr David Jukes

FAO/WHO Training Manual. Training Programme for Developing Food Standards within a Risk Analysis Framework

For further information, please contact:

Secretariat, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Codex Alimentarius Commission, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

REGULATORY CHALLENGES OF INNOVATION IN FOOD AND AGRICULTURE MARKET AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW FOODS

THE OVERVIEW OF FOOD QUALITY

Technews. July-August 2004 NEW CODEX STANDARDS RELEVANT TO DAIRY INDUSTRY

The role of JECFA for CCFA

Cooperation between the OIE and Codex: Codex perspective

Draft of the Rome Declaration on Nutrition

Food recall and traceability: Codex work Ms Annamaria Bruno, Codex Secretariat

E-FORUM ON THE ROLE OF CODEX IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GLOBAL STRATEGY ON DIET, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND HEALTH

Cumulative Risk Assessment

American Holistic Health Association Position Paper November 2004 Codex Meeting

SECTION III GUIDELINES FOR SUBSIDIARY BODIES. SECTION III: Guidelines for Subsidiary Bodies

WHO Initiative to Estimate the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases

Development of Food Safety Risk Assessment Guidelines for Foods of Animal Origin in International Trade t

Codex Alimentarius and dietary supplements, April 2005

OIE/FAO International Scientific Conference on Avian Influenza OIE Paris, France, 7 8 April 2005 RECOMMENDATIONS

The European Food Safety Summit

CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION

JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION. Thirty sixth Session Rome, Italy, 1-5 July 2013

Development of risk-based standard on aflatoxin in peanuts

CRD03. Introduction 1

Codex comités - ministerie VWS - Inge Stoelhorst (VGP) Rosa Peran (IZ)

EFSA and Member States

The legal basis of this draft Regulation is Art. 11 (4) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2204.

The Maltese Presidency of the Council of the EU Veterinary Sector

Access to Nutrition Statement

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT: CURRENT SITUATION IN THE PHILIPPINES

DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD

INFORMED CONSUMERS CONTENTS ONSUMERS FAIR PRACTICES DATE MARK D CONSUMERS NUTRIENT VALUES FORMED CONSUMERS CONTENTS OF INFORMED

2008 Public Status Report on the Implementation of the European Risk Management Strategy. Executive Summary

Health & Consumer Protection. EC legislation on food. Olga Solomon Unit E3

Implementation of indicators for biological hazards by meat inspection of poultry

ACCESS TO EC MARKET REQUIREMENTS TO FACILITIES BLATERAL NEGOTIATIONS ON ISSUES OF SANITARY AND PHYTO-SANITARY MEASURES

RISKS ASSESSMENT IN ROMANIAN FOOD SAFETY SYSTEMS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINS. Abstract

2 ND ANNUAL PAN-AFRICAN MEETING OF NATIONAL CODEX CONTACT POINT OFFICERS SUMMARY REPORT

Risk management of mycotoxin presence in food products:major unsolved points

A proposal for collaboration between the Psychometrics Committee and the Association of Test Publishers of South Africa

Intensifying our efforts towards a world free of the avoidable burden of NCDs

Agenda Item 10 CX/CAC 16/39/11 June 2016

SECOND FAO/OIE REGIONAL MEETING ON AVIAN INFLUENZA CONTROL IN ASIA Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, February 2005

APEC Scientific Seminar-Workshop on Food Safety Risk-Benefit Analysis. Manila, Philippines November 2011

Import Risk Assessment of Plant Pests The EU Situation

Feedback from the Member States questionnaire

Risk Assessment for Food Safety an introduction

INVOLVING YOU. Personal and Public Involvement Strategy

14414/15 AF/evt 1 DG G 3 C

New Zealand Government Oversight of Halal Certification of Animal Products Exported from New Zealand Auckland University Asia Dialogue July 2012

A Manual for the Agrochemical Industry

JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX COMMITTEE ON FATS AND OILS 25 th Session Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 27 February - 3 March 2017

UNICEF Nutrition Supplier Meeting

EN Chemical hazards in our food: EU food safety policy protects us but faces challenges. Special Report

JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX COMMITTEE ON FATS AND OILS 25 th Session Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 27 February - 3 March 2017

Agenda Item 14 CRD 2

JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME. CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION 31 st Session Geneva, Switzerland, 30 June 4 July 2008

Codex General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA) CODEX STAN

Analytical testing needed to

Reports of advisory bodies

SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUTRITION

- Regeln für die Lebensmittelqualität (Codex Alimentarius, Regeln für Kontrolle 1,

European standard setting via CEN TC 437

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION

OIE/FAO Global Conference on foot and mouth disease. The way towards global control. Paraguay: 24 to 26 June Draft Resolution version 8

Annex IV(k) DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Draft for comments only Not to be cited as East African Standard

Agenda Item 6(a) CX/FH 17/49/7 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME. CODEX COMMITTEE ON FOOD HYGIENE Forty-ninth Session

Hong Kong. Macao Passed Food Safety Law

Transcription:

Shenzhen China Food Safety Risk Communication Forum 2016 Guangdong Shenzhen 28.11.2016 Importance of Food Safety for Consumer Protection and International Trade Awilo Ochieng Pernet, Lic. in Law, MSc, Cert. Human Nutr. Chairperson, Codex Alimentarius Commission 1

Contents Risk analysis: Basis for Codex food safety standards Importance of Codex food safety and quality standards Global burden of foodborne diseases Questions & Discussion

Risk analysis: Basis for Codex food safety standards

The CAC has developed two sets of risk analysis documents 1. Working principles for risk analysis for application in the framework of the Codex Alimentarius (When developing Codex food safety standards) 2. Working principles for risk analysis for food safety for application by Governments

WORKING PRINCIPLES FOR RISK ANALYSIS FOR APPLICATION IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE CODEX ALIMENTARIUS (2003)

Working Principles for risk analysis for application in the framework of the Codex Alimentarius The objective of these Working Principles is to provide guidance to the Codex Alimentarius Commission and the Joint FAO/WHO expert bodies and consultations, so that food safety and health aspects of Codex standards and related texts are based on risk analysis.

Risk analysis principles in Codex When developing Codex standards and related texts, Codex food safety committees apply risk analysis principles and they rely on the scientific advice provided by the independent FAO/WHO Expert bodies e.g. JECFA, JMPR, JEMRA, etc.

Risk Analysis A process consisting of three components: Risk assessment Risk management Risk communication

Risk analysis in Codex Risk Managers: The Commission and its subsidiary bodies Risk Assessors: Joint FAO/WHO expert bodies and consultations Effective communication and consultation with all interested parties should be ensured throughout the risk analysis process.

Codex food safety committees which develop standards based on risk analysis principles 1. Codex Committee on Food Additives (Hosted by China) 2. Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods (Hosted by The Netherlands) 3. Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (Hosted by China) 4. Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods (Hosted by the United States of America) 5. Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (Hosted by Germany) 6. Codex Committee on Food Hygiene (Hosted by the United States of America)

Specific guidance on risk analysis developed by the relevant committees

WORKING PRINCIPLES FOR RISK ANALYSIS FOR FOOD SAFETY FOR APPLICATION BY GOVERNMENTS

Risk Communication in Codex The interactive exchange of information and opinions throughout the risk analysis process concerning risk, risk-related factors and risk perceptions, among risk assessors, risk managers, consumers, industry, the academic community and other interested parties, including the explanation of risk assessment findings and the basis of risk management decisions.

Risk Communication in Codex (please refer to paragraphs 37 to 41, Working Principles on Risk Analysis) Risk communication should: 1) promote awareness and understanding of the specific issues under consideration during the risk analysis; 2) promote consistency and transparency in formulating risk management options/recommendations; 3) provide a sound basis for understanding the risk management decisions proposed; 4) improve the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the risk analysis; 5) strengthen the working relationships among participants; 6) foster public understanding of the process, so as to enhance trust and confidence in the safety of the food supply; 7) promote the appropriate involvement of all interested parties; and 8) exchange information in relation to the concerns of interested parties about the risks associated with food.

Importance of Codex food safety and quality standards

The Codex Alimentarius Commission: Food safety and quality along the entire food chain!

Mandate of the CAC: to develop harmonised international food standards, guidelines and codes of practice to protect the health of consumers and to ensure fair practices in the food trade Art. 1 (a);

Mandate of the CAC: Promoting the coordination of all food standards work The CAC also has the mandate of promoting the coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organisations. Art. 1 (b) 23

Implementation of Codex standards: whole food chain approach Codex standards can be applied at various stages of the food chain in order to ensure food safety and quality, from primary production to consumption.

Implementation of Codex standards in international trade In international trade, Codex standards can be used for compliance with sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures and for trade negotiations. In addition, all along the value chain, various Codex principles such as traceability/product tracing may be applied.

Codex Strategic Plan 2014-2019 Strategic vision statement: To be the preeminent international food standards-setting body to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair practices in the food trade. Codex core values: Collaboration Inclusiveness Consensus building Transparency Strategic goals: 1. Establish international food standards that address current and emerging food issues. 2. Ensure the application of risk analysis principles in the development of Codex standards. 3. Facilitate the participation of all Codex Members. 4. Implement effective and efficient work management systems and practices.

Universality of Codex Standards Codex food safety and quality Standards, Guidelines, Codes of Practice, etc. are developed in an inclusive, transparent, collaborative and consensual manner by the 188* Codex Members with the participation of 240* Observer Organisations. * Status: 19.11.2016

Universality of Codex Standards Codex Standards are science-based. Codex commodity standards also have food safety components e.g. Sections on food additives, food hygiene, contaminants in foods, etc. These sections are forwarded to the relevant horizontal committees for endorsement prior to the adoption of the commodity standard by the CAC.

Universality of Codex Standards Protecting the health of the consumers by ensuring food safety should be a top priority in every country! A holistic food chain approach where relevant stakeholders ensure food safety from primary production to consumption is the most effective way to ensure food safety.

Universality of Codex Standards All Codex Standards and related texts are accessible free-of-charge from the Codex website (24 hours, 365 days/year) in order to ensure their universal consultation and application by all interested parties. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/standards/list-standards/en/

Codex standards and food trade All Codex Members engage in the food trade either as food exporters and/or food importers. Compliance with sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) and technical requirements is a prerequisite for access to the food trade.

Importance of effective implementation of Codex standards by relevant stakeholders along the entire food chain The effective implementation of Codex Standards, Guidelines, Codes of Practice, MRLs, etc. by the relevant stakeholders along the entire food chain as well as effective national food control and management systems ensure food safety and quality for both the domestic and export market consumers.

Codex standards and food trade Codex standards can be applied at the international, regional or national levels in order to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair practices in the food trade. Codex Standards serve as THE reference in case of a food-related trade dispute within the WTO system.

Codex and the WTO Since 1995, the CAC is the international reference for food safety recognised by the World Trade Organisation s Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement).

Codex and the WTO The WTO Agreement on the Application of the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) explicitly recognises the competence of the CAC in setting international food safety standards, whilst the food quality, nutrition and labelling aspects of Codex standards are covered by the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/15-sps.pdf http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt.pdf

Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases

FOOD SAFETY AN ISSUE OF GREAT CONCERN TO THE ENTIRE WORLD S CONSUMERS Food safety is an issue of great concern to the entire world s consumers, as we all need to have access to safe and nutritious food everyday. In most cases, consumers enjoy safe domestically-produced and imported food. Unfortunately, foodborne diseases still occur all over the world in both developed and developing countries.

Published in 2015

WHO estimates of foodborne diseases (FBD) The WHO Report estimates that FBD caused by 31 agents bacteria, viruses, parasites, toxins and chemicals affect approximately 600 million people/year. Almost 1 in 10 people in the world, fall ill after consuming contaminated food. FBD cause 420 000 deaths/year, including 125 000 children under the age of 5 years.

WHO estimates of foodborne diseases Burden of FBD in developing countries The risk of FBD is most severe in low- and middle-income countries, linked to preparing food with unsafe water; poor hygiene and inadequate conditions in food production and storage; lower levels of literacy and education; and insufficient food safety legislation or implementation of such legislation.

WHO estimates of foodborne diseases Burden of FBD in developing countries While the burden of foodborne diseases is a public health concern globally, the WHO African and South-East Asia Regions have the highest incidence and highest death rates, including among children under the age of 5 years.

WHO estimates of foodborne diseases By incorporating these estimates into policy development at both national and international levels, all stakeholders can contribute to improvements in safety throughout the food chain. These results will also help to direct future research activities.

From farm to plate, make food safe! Source: http://www.who.int/campaigns/world-health-day/2015/event/en/

WORLD FOOD SAFETY DAY At its 39 th Session (Rome, July 2016), the Codex Alimentarius Commission supported the establishment of a World Food Safety Day on a permanent basis.

QUESTIONS / DISCUSSION