PCORnet Use Cases. Observational study: Dabigatran vs warfarin and ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke / extra-cranial bleeding

Similar documents
MINI-SENTINEL MEDICAL PRODUCT ASSESSMENT A PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSMENT OF DABIGATRAN

Show Me the Outcomes!

MINI-SENTINEL SURVEILLANCE PLAN MINI-SENTINEL PROSPECTIVE ROUTINE OBSERVATIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM TOOLS (PROMPT): RIVAROXABAN SURVEILLANCE

FDA Sentinel Initiative: Status Update and Examples of Contributions to Regulatory Decisions

Immunization Safety Office: Overview and Considerations on Safety of Alternative Immunization Schedules

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process

Using the NIH Collaboratory's and PCORnet's distributed data networks for clinical trials and observational research - A preview

Novel Anticoagulants : Bleeding and Bridging

Drug Class Review Newer Oral Anticoagulant Drugs

RESEARCH. Shirley V Wang, Jessica M Franklin, Robert J Glynn, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Wesley Eddings, Joshua J Gagne. open access

Randomized Clinical Trial Using FDA s Sentinel Infrastructure: An Analysis Assessing Feasibility

Atrial fibrillation is a potent risk factor for ischemic

ADC Slides for Presentation 02/10/2017

Condition Congestive heart failure I11.0; I13.0; I13.2; I42.0; I50 CO3C Left ventricular dysfunction I50.1; I50.9 E11 1; E11 9

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 60 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin use

Anticoagulation Therapy in LTC

Apixaban for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis

Afib, Stroke, and DOAC. Albert Luo, MD. Cardiology Lindsey Frischmann, DO. Neurology Xiao Cai, MD. HBS

MINI-SENTINEL PROSPECTIVE SURVEILLANCE PLAN. PROSPECTIVE ROUTINE OBSERVATIONAL MONITORING OF MIRABEGRON Report 1 of 4

A Patient Unsuitable for VKA Treatment

Practical Considerations for Using Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Antiplatelets and Anticoagulants. Helen Leung, PharmD PGY1 Pharmacy Resident Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center

How CDER is Using Mini-Sentinel Tools and Resources for Post-Marketing Safety Issues

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

Supplementary Online Content

Zhao Y Y et al. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:

RETROSPECTIVE CLAIMS DATABASE STUDIES OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS (DOACS) FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Do Not Cite. Draft for Work Group Review.

Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network

TSHP 2014 Annual Seminar 1

IMPACT-AFib: An 80,000 Person Randomized Trial Using the FDA Sentinel System Platform

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology And Pharmacoeconomics Technical Report Series

Analysing Apixaban: Potential Growth Driver for Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. Tro Kalayjian Chief Medical Analyst Chimera Research Group

Brookings Roundtable on Active Medical Product Surveillance:

Clinical Study Synopsis

Plans for Surveillance of Acute Myocardial Infarction in users of Oral Anti Diabetes Drugs

Comorbidity or medical history Existing diagnoses between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2011 AF management care AF symptoms Tachycardia

FDA-CATALYST PROTOCOL

WATCHMAN PROTECT AF Study Rev. 6

ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral artery embolism

Practical Lessons Learned for Identification of Thromboembolic Events and Intravenous Immunoglobulin Exposure in the Sentinel Distributed Database

Insights from the Kaiser Permanente database

Renal Function Considerations for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

ESC Heart & Brain Workshop

Supplementary Appendix

Atrial Fibrillation Implementation challenges. Lesley Edgar Ross Maconachie

Dabigatran Evidence in Real Practice

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Jacqueline C. Barrientos, Nicole Meyer, Xue Song, Kanti R. Rai ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2015:3301

Objectives. Falling Down on Warfarin Therapy. CHADS 2 Score. CHADS 2 & CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc Score. HAS-BLED Score 04/08/2014. Real World Application

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

Study period Total sample size (% women) 899 (37.7%) Warfarin Aspirin

FDA-CATALYST PROTOCOL

6 th ACC-SHA Joint Meeting Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Peer Review Report #2. Novel oral anticoagulants. (1) Does the application adequately address the issue of the public health need for the medicine?

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Supplementary Appendix

Role of NOACs in AF Management. From Evidence to Real World Data Focus on Cardioversion

Trends and Variation in Oral Anticoagulant Choice in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation,

Risk of serious infections associated with use of immunosuppressive agents in pregnant women with autoimmune inflammatory conditions: cohor t study

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

What s new with DOACs? Defining place in therapy for edoxaban &

CADTH Therapeutic Review

Oral Anticoagulation Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Older Adults Brian Skinner, PharmD

ISCHEMIC VASCULAR DISEASE (IVD) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW

Malmö Preventive Project. Cardiovascular Endpoints

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. Table of Contents

Supplementary Appendix

FINAL CDEC RECOMMENDATION

State of art in anticoagulation in non valvular Atrial Fibrillation: the additional value of Rivaroxaban real life data

INR as a Biomarker: Anticoagulation in Atrial Fib, Heart Failure, and Cardiovascular Disease Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

Supplementary Appendix

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis in surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves: an observational study

MINI-SENTINEL METHODS PROSPECTIVE ROUTINE OBSERVATIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM TOOLS (PROMPT) USERS GUIDE

Supplementary Online Content

Updates in Atrial Fibrillation

Modular Program Report

Χάρης Κοσσυβάκης Επιμελητής A Καρδιολογικό Τμήμα Γ.Ν.Α. «Γ. ΓΕΝΝΗΜΑΤΑΣ»

Preventing Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: USING THE EVIDENCE

Debate: New Generation Anti-Coagulation Agents are a Better Choice than Warfarin in the Management of AF

Alan Barber. Professor of Clinical Neurology University of Auckland

Supplementary Online Content

2 Summary of NICE TA 249: Atrial fibrillation - Dabigatran Etexilate

The risk of ischemic stroke is 5 times as high in individuals

Asif Serajian DO FACC FSCAI

Registry Highlights. Dale Daniel Symposium Hip Fracture Registry. Overall Volume by Year and Region 3/7/2014

When and how to combine antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant?

Supplementary Online Content

Nibal R. Chamoun, Pharm.D., BCPS Clinical Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice at the Lebanese American University Clinical Pharmacy Coordinator

Status of the CKD and ESRD treatment: Growth, Care, Disparities

Do s and Don t of DOACs DISCLOSURE

1 Cohort Identification within FDA's Mini-Sentinel Program

Management of Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) with the DAWN AC modules

Anticoagulation Task Force

Challenges in Anticoagulation Bridging and Emerging Therapies. Disclosures and Relationships. Objectives. Dr. Cumbler has no conflicts of interest

Drug Class Monograph

Transcription:

PCORnet Use Cases Observational study: Dabigatran vs warfarin and ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke / extra-cranial bleeding 1

Observational study: Dabigatran vs warfarin and stroke / bleeding Goal: Compare ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and extracranial bleeding rates among new users of dabigatran or warfarin therapy who have atrial fibrillation/flutter

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Funding / leadership An FDA sponsored Mini-Sentinel evaluation Lead team: Alan S. Go, MD, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Joshua Gagne, PharmD, ScD, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Marsha Reichman, PhD, FDA; David Graham, MD, MPH, FDA www.mini-sentinel.org/work_products/assessments/mini-sentinel_protocol-for-assessment-of-dabigatran.pdf 3

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Participating Mini-Sentinel sites Kaiser Permanente N. California Northwest Colorado Hawaii Mid-Atlantic Georgia Group Health Cooperative HealthPartners Marshfield Clinic, Meyers Primary Care Inst, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Henry Ford Health System Aetna Humana HealthCore (WellPoint) Optum 4

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Overview Design: New user parallel cohort Eligible patients: >21y.o. with atrial fibrillation/flutter without warfarin or dabigatran in prior 180 days, plus others Drug exposure: Pharmacy dispensing data with days supply Primary outcomes: Ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, extracranial hemorrhage Effect estimation: Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression; Stratified rate differences Both use marginal structural models with inverse probability weighting Confounder adjustment: propensity score matching

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Inclusion criteria First dispensing of dabigatran or warfarin from November 1, 2010 to most recent data Age >21 years at first dispensing One or more diagnoses of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter based on inpatient or outpatient ICD-9-CM codes (427.31, 427.32) on or before the first dabigatran or warfarin therapy 6

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Exclusion criteria <180 days complete pharmacy and clinical data immediately preceding first exposure to dabigatran/warfarin (index date) Any dispensing for warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban during the 180 days before index date Known mechanical heart valve or diagnosed mitral stenosis at index date based on diagnosis or procedure codes Chronic hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis at index date based on corresponding administrative diagnosis and/or procedure codes History of kidney transplant at index date based on diagnosis and/or procedure codes Resident in a skilled nursing facility or nursing home at index date 7

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Drug exposure Assessed from pharmacy dispensing records, including days supply Exposure begins the day after the first dispensing (index) date. Gaps <7 days are ignored (gaps <14 days will also be evaluated) INR testing data will also be used to assess warfarin exposure when available 8

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Primary Outcomes Ischemic stroke: hospital primary discharge diagnoses Intracranial hemorrhage: hospital primary and secondary discharge diagnoses Sensitivity analysis will exclude intracranial hemorrhage associated with major trauma Major extracranial hemorrhage: hospital primary discharge diagnoses of extracranial hemorrhage (gastrointestinal and all other sites combined) 9

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Secondary Outcomes Hospitalized acute myocardial infarction: Primary discharge diagnosis for myocardial infarction or Death occurring within one day of an emergency department visit for acute ischemic heart disease 10

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Data sources Administrative files: Demographic data Eligible person time Dispensing data: Outpatient medications, including dosage form and days supply Claims: Diagnoses Procedures, including INR obtained and selected inpatient medications EHR (available for a minority) Lab test results (INR, renal function, etc.) 11

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Effect estimation Time to event models: Proportional hazards regression models stratified by matched sets within locations Test for interactions between treatment and time Rate differences: Stratified inverse variance weighted summary rate differences for person time data 12

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Follow up Begins on the day after the index date Continues while they are continuously exposed to the index medication Eligible to enter the analysis only once 13

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Confounders Risk factors for bleeding Risk factors for ischemic stroke, MI, thromboembolism Overall health status, including measures of frailness Medications 14

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Confounder adjustment Propensity score (PS) matching Dabigatran and warfarin (1:1 and variable ratio) PS models will be developed in each site 15

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Sample size Projected 26,000 41,000 matched pairs Excellent power to find 50% difference for every outcome Variable power to find 25% difference 16

Dabigatran vs warfarin: Data sharing Distributed NO individual level data shared Identification of included/excluded new users of dabigatran and warfarin Creation of site-specific propensity score models Identification of propensity score matched pairs of dabigatran/warfarin new users Centralized NO protected health information (PHI) is shared Regression modeling Marginal structural models to assess robustness to time varying confounding Requires one record per person w/ exposure, outcome, subgroup (age <65 or 65+, etc) and confounder status (propensity score, or inverse probability weight) in each 30 day period after index date, censoring in interval, arbitrary ID of matched pair 17

An Analysis of Approaches to Privacy Protecting Data Sharing www.mini-sentinel.org/work_products/statistical_methods/mini-sentinel_methods_evaluating-strategies-for-data-sharing-and-analyses.pdf 18