Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging. Matthew J Fleishman MD MMM FACR

Similar documents
Risks of Modern Radiology. Dr Grant Meikle Consultant Radiologist

Diagnostic Allegations Focus on Office-Based Claims Experience

General principles of screening: A radiological perspective

A Review of Medical Malpractice Claims from the CRICO Comparative Benchmarking System

Lung Cancer Screening:

Survey of Mammography Facilities

Disclosures. Overview. Selection the most accurate statement: Updates in Lung Cancer Screening 5/26/17. No Financial Disclosures

Best Medical Practices: Maximizing Skills, Minimizing Risk Lung Cancer

Role of CT in Lung Cancer Screening: 2010 Stuart S. Sagel, M.D.

Robert J. McKenna M.D. Chief, Thoracic Surgery Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Diagnostic Dilemmas of Breast Imaging

Screening for Disease

objectives Pitfalls and Pearls in PET/CT imaging Kevin Robinson, DO Assistant Professor Department of Radiology Michigan State University

A Closer Look at Radiology s Role in Corporate Healthcare. Mark D. Jensen, CEO, Charlotte Radiology

A superior chest x-ray computer-aided detection (CXR CAD) application: a reader study

1. A(n) is someone who has education, profession or specialized experience that qualifies him or her with great knowledge of a certain subject.

How the heck did I miss that? How visual attention limits visual perception Jeremy Wolfe Brigham & Women s Hospital/ Harvard Medical School

Managing Error in Ambulatory Care

Mistakes We Make: MSK

The Spectrum of Management of Pulmonary Ground Glass Nodules

COLORECTAL CANCER STAGING in 2010

Learning Objectives. 1. Identify which patients meet criteria for annual lung cancer screening

Impact of WRVU Changes. Allowed Charges (Millions)

Detecting Lung Nodules: Challenges and Solutions. Geoffrey D. Rubin, MD, MBA, FACR, FSCBTMR

Lung Cancer screening :

Normal Recovery or Complication: The Risks of Post-Operative Care

LUNG CANCER SCREENING: LUNG CANCER SCREENING: THE TIME HAS COME LUNG CANCER: A NATIONAL EPIDEMIC

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: MAMMOGRAPHY: COMPUTER- AIDED DETECTION (CAD) POLICY NUMBER: CATEGORY: Technology Assessment

Name of Policy: Computer-aided Detection (CAD) Mammography

Screening for Lung Cancer. Michael S. Nolledo, MD Deborah Heart and Lung Center

CAPITAL HEALTH CENTER FOR ONCOLOGY. capitalhealth.org/oncology

The solitary pulmonary nodule: Assessing the success of predicting malignancy

Christina Martin Kazi Russell MED INF 406 INFERENCING Session 8 Group Project November 15, 2014

Introduction to WVU Radiology

The Burden of Medical Error The Case for Clinical Decision Support

Example of lung screening

Productivity Measurement & Management- Stepping on the 3 rd Rail of Radiology

The Maine Lung Cancer Coalition. Working Together to Reduce Lung Cancer in Maine

SURVEY OF MAMMOGRAPHY PRACTICE

expectancy Cancer spread to bones life expectancy

Residents should be able to understand the role of imaging-guidance to facilitate common radiological procedures.

PHYSICIAN LIABILITY TRENDS

PSA To screen or not to screen? Darrel Drachenberg, MD, FRCSC

LUNG CANCER SCREENING WHAT S THE IMPACT? Nitra Piyavisetpat, MD Department of Radiology Chulalongkorn University

Financial Disclosures

Clinical Trials. Amy Liu. October 30, Cancer Care Ontario. Introduction to Statistical Methods for.

Let s look a minute at the evidence supporting current cancer screening recommendations.

Will CT screening reduce overall lung cancer mortality? Associate Professor of Radiology Department of Medical Imaging UHN / MSH / WCH

Pan Scan Instead of Clinical Exam? David A. Spain, MD

A Comprehensive Cancer Center Designated by the National Cancer Institute

Diffuse high-attenuation within mediastinal lymph nodes on non-enhanced CT scan: Usefulness in the prediction of benignancy

Radiology Rotation Educational Goals & Objectives for Internal Medicine

Mammography. What is Mammography? What are some common uses of the procedure?

Dual Process Theory. Conference for General Practice 2013 Generalism: The heart of health care Jeff Brown

Medical Screening: Ethical Considerations Professor Jim Malone, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

Breast Cancer: Selected Topics for the Primary Care Clinician

Matter of Rodino v Yacovone 2016 NY Slip Op 31142(U) June 16, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /14 Judge: Alice Schlesinger

Radiologic and pathologic correlation of non-mass like breast lesions on US and MRI: Benign, high risk, versus malignant

Radiologic and pathologic correlation of non-mass like breast lesions on US and MRI: Benign, high risk, versus malignant

Learning how to start turning the discrepancy meeting into an educational cases meeting

HEALTHCARE AI DEVELOPMENT CYCLE

UNDERSTANDING MEDICAL RECORDS

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography

Michael A. Bettmann, MD, FACR Co-Chair, ACR Committee on Clinical Imaging Decision Support

HealthTrek. Radiology: Liability Trends. February 2007

What to know and what to make of it

OCW Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 2010 Michael D. Kneeland, MD November 18, 2010 SCREENING. Learning Objectives for this session:

Mammography. What is Mammography?

Insurance Guide For Dental Healthcare Professionals

SCBT-MR 2015 Incidentaloma on Chest CT

Breast Tomosynthesis An additional screening tool in the fight against breast cancer

WHAT TO EXPECT. Breast Tomosynthesis An additional screening tool in the fight against breast cancer HOLOGIC. The Women's Health Company

GENERAL COMMENTS. The Task Force Process Should be Fully Open, Balanced and Transparent

Pulmonary Nodules. Michael Morris, MD

CHAPTER 2 MAMMOGRAMS AND COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION

A N.S. Technologists Experiences

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

What s New in Breast Imaging. Jennifer A. Harvey, M.D., FACR Professor of Radiology University of Virginia

What to Do with Small Lung Nodules Hanh Vu Nghiem, MD William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, Michigan

Imaging Decisions Start Here SM

Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery (MINS): What is it and what can we do to help patients suffering this event? PJ Devereaux, MD, PhD

GUEN DONDÉ HEAD OF RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS ETHICS

Low Risk Chest Pain. Objectives. Disclosure. Case 1. Jeffrey Tabas, MD Professor of Emergency Medicine Office of CME UCSF School of Medicine

BREAST CANCER SCREENING IS A CHOICE

Current Status of Supplementary Screening With Breast Ultrasound

Faculty Disclosure. Objectives. Lung Cancer in Kentucky: Improving Patient Outcomes 10/28/16. Lung Cancer Burden in Kentucky

Pathologic outcomes of coarse heterogeneous calcifications detected on mammography

Imaging in the Trauma Patient

Practice Member Profile

Recommendations for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management, Second edition

Updates in Mammography. Dr. Yang Faridah A. Aziz Department of Biomedical Imaging University Malaya Medical Centre

Strategic Decision Making. Steven R. Van Hook, PhD

Case 1. BREAST CANCER From Diagnosis to Treatment: The Role of Primary Care

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

CT Lung Screening Implementation Challenges: State Based Initiatives

Henda s Law. Supplemental screening for women with dense breast tissue and increased risk

Lung Cancer Screening

Managing the Risk of Liability to Students Disciplined for Sexual Assault. Erin Buzuvis, J.D. Professor of Law, Western New England University

Master Class: Fundamentals of Lung Cancer

CT Lung Screening Implementation Challenges: ALA/ATS Implementation Microsite

Transcription:

Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging Matthew J Fleishman MD MMM FACR

Disclosures: None

Objectives 1. Magnitude of errors & $ losses 2. Basis for major errors 3. Strategies to mitigate error, injury and losses Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 3

$ Loss Injury Malpractice Cost Societal Cost Error Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 4

Error and Lawsuits Most errors do not result in a claim or payments 37% of lawsuits have no medical error Most are denied compensation Defense verdicts or $ payments don t = error For every $1 paid in compensation. 54 cents go to attorneys, expenses, court fees 1 in 6 claims with errors --> no payment Disputing and paying for errors accounts for most of the $ spent Localio et al NEJM 1991 Studdert et al Med Care 2000 Studdert et al NEJM 2006 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 5

Prevalence of Error Perceptual specialties: 5% diagnostic error Cognitive specialties: 10-15% diagnostic error Garland 1959 Rads miss 30% of positive findings 4% overall error rate Xray, Mamms, US: 3.5% CT: 32% No Δ six decades Most rads don't study their errors Garland AJR 1959 Rad Qual Inst 2012 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 6

Total Indemnity 2006-2015 OB & Gyn $1,396,522,114 General Surgery $853,403,358 Internal Medicine $810,788,957 X Radiology $664,858,230 Family Practice $664,433,524 Orthopedic Surgery $554,701,753 OB & Gyn General Surgery Internal Medicine Radiology #4 #3 Family Practice Orthopedic Surgery Anesthesiology Emergency Medicine Neurosurgery Neurosurgery $272,993,363 Emergency Medicine $279,222,474 Anesthesiology $365,386,376 Cardiothoracic Surgery Radiology Series PIAA 2016 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 7

Claims in Radiology Condition Breast carcinoma Lung carcinoma Abdomen & Pelvis Sx Claims with Indemnity Share of Radiology Indemnity Dollars 39% 12.1% 36% 4.5% 26% 2.7% Spine fractures 30% 2.2% Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 8

Claims in Medicine By Error Error Failure to Diagnose Wrong or delayed Failure to Test Wrong or delayed % of Claims 39% 32% Medication Error 19% TDC Closed Claims 2007-2014 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 9

Claims in Medicine By Venue Venue % of Claims Office or Clinic 57% Hospital 34% SNF and Rehab 9% TDC Closed Claims 2007-2014 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 10

Claims in Medicine By Condition Condition % of Claims ACS 6% Lung Cancer 5% Colorectal Cancer 5% Prostate Cancer 3% TDC Closed Claims 2007-2014 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 11

Claims in Medicine with Death Condition % of Claims ACS 19% Medication Error 12% Sepsis 8% Pneumonia 5% Lung Cancer 5% Gastric & Colon Cancer 3% TDC Closed Claims 2007-2014 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 12

Main Allegations of Liability Perceptual error Interpretation error Failure to communicate in a timely and appropriate manner Failure to suggest the next appropriate study or action Procedural complications Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 13

Error Patterns from Missed Cases 558 cases reviewed over 92 months 80% perceptual errors 20% interpretive errors Why so many errors? X-ray: lung nodules, fractures, mets CT: bone lesions, blood clots, GI tumors 56% subtle, 44% non-subtle Donald et al JMI Rad Onc 2012 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 14

System I - Fast Automatic & unconscious Effortless decisions shaped by context Great pattern recognition Impaired by cognitive bias System II - Slow Deliberate & conscious Effortful decision-making Reasoned conclusions Cognitive De-biasing Impaired by fatigue, hunger, distraction Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 15

Basis of Perceptual Errors Limits of thinking & visual perception Alertness Fatigue Task duration Distraction Ambient conditions Controllable Target prevalence: frequency of lesions Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 16

Target Prevalence Given finding missed 30% when present < 1% of the time Screening mammography Screening CT for lung cancer Airport screening Given finding missed only 7% when present 50% of the time Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 17

Commonly Missed Lesions Breast lesions in mammography Lung nodules on CXR, CT Foreign bodies (gorilla-like) Fractures Bone tumors on plain x-rays Stroke PIAA 2016 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 18

Interpretation Error Knowledge Experience Judgment History Prior studies, prior reports Bias Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 19

Interpretion Error - Bias Availability bias: favor easily remembered dx Framing bias: undue influence by history Regret bias: wrongly estimate chance of bad dx Confirmation bias: support 1 dx, discount others Attribution bias: dx limited based on patient type Alliteration bias: repeating previous errors Commission bias: need to do something Omission bias: afraid to do something Hindsight bias: over-estimate dx later proven Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 20

Use of Clinical History Correct history Increase in true-positives from 38% to 84% Ideally, read history after first review False-positives are reduced No impact on false-negatives (misses) Requires great discipline Fictitious history Increases false observations Griscom Radiology 2002 Doubilet AJR 1982 Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 21

Outpatient pre-op CXR Friday night 7 PM Three day weekend Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 22

Communication Errors Standard is established by experts Viewed very negatively to fail Delayed dx breast cancer with failed communication Awards/settlements higher by > 2X Indemnity attributed to radiologist higher by 4 to 15X Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 23

Communication Failures 23,658 cases 2009-2013 Communication issues 30% of cases 7,149 cases $1.7B in losses Information is the currency of safe care CRICO 2015 Annual Benchmark Report Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 24

Reducing Perception Errors Type I Thinking, Environment, Percepts Cognitive de-biasing: force Type II think Context: ie COPD hunt for nodules Blind spots: learn, build personal check-list Disengaged? use a magnifying tool, invert Missed case review Environment: work to optimize Percepts CAD for mamms, CXR, chest CT? Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 25

CADe DETECTION 6 months earlier Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 26

True Positive Rate 100% 80% ROC Curves 1. Find the breast cancers 2. Avoid over-calls 60% 40% 20% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% False Positive Rate Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 27

True Positive Rate 100% ROC Curves 80% 60% 40% 20% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% False Positive Rate Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 28

* = Calcification = Mass = Distortion * * * * Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 29

True Positive Rate 100% ROC Curves +/- CAD Rad only 80% 60% 40% 20% Rad with CADe CAD for Mamms Reduced accuracy Increased biopsy rate NOT clearly associated with improved detection of invasive breast cancer Become routine in US NEJM 2007 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% False Positive Rate Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 30

Artificial Intelligence Great promise to enhance diagnostics Benefit to perceptual & cognitive specialties Death of radiology has been predicted Real opportunity lies in decreasing risk Errors in radiology 1. Perception 2. Interpretation 3. Communication Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 31

* = Calcification = Mass = Distortion * * * * Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 32

Mitigating Risk in Medicine Focus on presenting hx, especially repeat visits Evaluate patients all ages with atypical chest pain Pay close attention to post-op complaints Document well, including phone advice Clear office policies on tracking test results Confirm understanding of plan, Rx, follow-up Confirm intention ability to buy Rx, make f/u Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 33

Objectives 1. Magnitude of errors & $ losses 2. Basis for major errors 3. Strategies to mitigate error, injury and losses Error, Injury & Loss in Medical Imaging 34