SELF-RATED MENTAL HEALTH

Similar documents
Adult overweight and obesity

Facts on: Self Rated Oral Health

SMOKING STAGES OF CHANGE KEY MESSAGES

2017/18 Influenza Season Summary

8 Key Findings from the 2018 Community Cannabis Survey

DAILY SMOKERS - AVERAGE NUMBER OF CIGARETTES SMOKED DAILY KEY MESSAGES

Northern Health Information Partnership 10 Elm St., Suite 500A, Sudbury, ON P3C 5N3 <

USE OF PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT SNOWBOARDING

1. Heavy drinking amongst adults in Toronto remained fairly stable from 2007 to 2014.

Timiskaming Health Stats

EXPOSURE TO SECOND-HAND SMOKE IN THE HOME KEY MESSAGES

Cigarette smoking is the number one cause of preventable death and disease in Ontario. Smoking kills half of its long-term users.

Burden of Illness Chapter 3

Executive Summary. Demographics

HEALTH SURVEILLANCE INDICATORS: COLORECTAL CANCER. Public Health Relevance. Highlights

Vancouver Coastal Health & Fraser Health Data Summary Sheets: Alcohol Use. Purpose. Overview. Overall Alcohol Use. Overall Binge Drinking Prevalence

EVER HAD A FLU SHOT KEY MESSAGES

PROFILE OF CURRENT SMOKERS KEY MESSAGES

HEALTH SURVEILLANCE INDICATORS: LUNG CANCER. Public Health Relevance. Highlights.

HEALTH SURVEILLANCE INDICATORS: YOUTH SMOKING. Public Health Relevance. Highlights.

Burden of Illness. Chapter 3 -- Highlights Document ONTARIO WOMEN'S HEALTH EQUITY REPORT

Influenza Vaccination Coverage in British Columbia Canadian Community Health Survey 2011 & 2012

FRUIT AND VEGETABLE CONSUMPTION LESS THAN FIVE TIMES PER DAY

Leeds, Grenville & Lanark Community Health Profile: Healthy Living, Chronic Diseases and Injury

Sleep. Health indicator report. Background. Key findings

Information Management. A System We Can Count On. Chronic Conditions. in the Central East LHIN

HEALTH SURVEILLANCE INDICATORS: BREAST CANCER SCREENING. Public Health Relevance. Highlights.

Trends in adult obesity

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF HEALTH FOR THE PORCUPINE HEALTH UNIT Held on March 18, 2016, Timmins Office, Board Room. Michael Shea Steve Black Gil Hebert

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CIHI Trends in Health Inequalities in Canada. APHEO September 15, 2014

TOBACCO USE IN CANADA: FINDINGS FROM THE CCHS

Selected Overweight- and Obesity- Related Health Disorders

Central LHIN Health Service Needs Assessment and Gap Analysis:

ONTARIO ATLAS OF ADULT MORTALITY TRENDS IN LOCAL HEALTH INTEGRATION NETWORKS

Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

APPENDIX J Health Studies

chapter 12 MENTAL HEALTH

Factors associated with vitamin/mineral supplement use by Canadians

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Appendix A, B, C, D

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Youth

chapter 8 CANCER Is cancer becoming more common? Yes and No.

Wendy Carew Christine Bidmead

Table Case control studies of parental consumption of alcoholic beverages and childhood hematopoietic cancer

OVERVIEW OF GENDER ISSUES IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN VIETNAM

Estimates and predictors of health care costs of esophageal adenocarcinoma: a population-based cohort study

ALBERTA. Population, Socioeconomics and Health Summary. are we? FEBRUARY How healthy

Medically unexplained physical symptoms by Jungwee Park and Sarah Knudson

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Tobacco

Other Substance Use Among Students in Grades 7 to 12 in the NBPSDHU Region

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Mental Health Profile of Windsor and Essex County. WINDSOR-ESSEX COUNTY HEALTH UNIT August 2016

Expression of Interest

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Unveiling a new strategy to stop substance abuse in our communities. November 20, 2008 Ingersoll, Ontario

Population Growth and Demographic Changes in Halton-Peel. Phase I Report: Demographic Analysis

Errata. After Publication, we found a few errors in Figures and text from How Are Manitoba s Children Doing?.

The Canadian Community Health Survey

Seniors Health in York Region

Trends in: Flu Immunization

About the Mid-West. Opportunity Area. Who is the population of focus? Why This Opportunity Was Identified. Considerations

Application of the Dietary Reference Intakes in developing a recommendation for pregnancy iron supplements in Canada 1 3

Obesity: a Growing Issue

ONTARIO RESPIRATORY PATHOGEN BULLETIN. Assessment of Influenza Activity in Ontario

Oral Health in Perth County

List of Exhibits Adult Stroke

The Canadian Community Health Survey: what s new in the 2015 cycle?

Cancer in Halton. Halton Region Cancer Incidence and Mortality Report

Substance Abuse Hospitalizations

Obesity is recognized as a major public health

The Burden of Kidney Disease in Rural & Northern Ontario

FACT SHEET 1. Breastfeeding in Ontario Notable Trends within the Province

An Application of Propensity Modeling: Comparing Unweighted and Weighted Logistic Regression Models for Nonresponse Adjustments

Cancer Prevention and Screening: Working together in NE Aboriginal Communities

Person-years; number of study participants (number of cases) HR (95% CI) P for trend

KEY FINDINGS. Mental health status is a significant contributor to overall health and well being.

Mark Asbridge, PhD Donald Langille, MD Jennifer Cartwright, MA. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology Dalhousie University

Health Quality Ontario

Medical Assistance in Dying Community of Practice January 12, 2018

Brief. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Health Based Allocation Model (HBAM) Funding Formula for LHINs. Mental Health & Addictions Sector

Data Sources, Methods and Limitations

Author's response to reviews

Status of Mental Health in Ottawa

Falls Prevention in Primary Care: Assessment to Intervention

BC Cancer Cervix Screening 2015 Program Results. February 2018

County-Level Analysis of U.S. Licensed Psychologists and Health Indicators

Neighbourhood HEALTH PROFILE A PEEL HEALTH STATUS REPORT BRAMPTON. S. Fennell, Brampton Mayor

Article. The feasibility of establishing correction factors to adjust self-reported estimates of obesity

Keeping Albertans healthy

Problem Two (Data Analysis) Grading Criteria and Suggested Answers

The epidemiology of HIV infection among MSM in Ontario: The situation to 2009

Suicide in the Region of Peel and Ontario

Data Brief. Exploring Urban Environments and Inequalities in Health

ONTARIO RESPIRATORY PATHOGEN BULLETIN. Assessment of Influenza Activity in Ontario

Recent Mental Health Surveys at Statistics Canada

Indonesia-Intensified Iodine Deficiency Control Project. Ministry of Health (MOH)/Ministry of Industry (MOI)

Association between immigration status & cervical cancer screening: systematic review & meta-analysis

Article. Chronic pain in Canadian seniors. by Pamela L. Ramage-Morin. Component of Statistics Canada Catalogue no X Health Reports

Kentucky Needs Assessment Project Brief Report

Transcription:

SELF-RATED MENTAL HEALTH Self-Rated Mental Health: Age-adjusted percentage of the population aged 18 years or older who reported their own mental health status as being either very good/excellent, or fair/poor. region: The North East Local Health Integration Network (NE LHIN) region boundaries normally include the North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit (). However, for comparison purposes the NE LHIN region is defined as the whole of the region excluding the region. Data sources: Canadian Community Health Survey 2007/08, 2009/10, 2011/12, 2013/14, Statistics Canada, Share File, Ministry of Health and Long- Term Care. Rate calculations: Crude rates were age-standardized using the Direct Method and standard 2011 Canadian population. Data analysis for Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) data: The confidence intervals and variance were measured using the bootstrapping method, calculated with STATA IC/14.2 (2014). Interpretation of a significant difference: A statistic interpreted as significantly different from another is an estimate found to be statistically meaningful; the difference is unlikely due to chance. Error bars noted in figures within this report illustrate 95% confidence intervals. If there is no overlap in range between confidence intervals, the difference can be described as statistically significant. Overall Self-Rated Mental Health In 2013/14, more than two thirds of the adult age-standardized population in the region felt their mental health was very good or excellent, comparable to the percentage for the North East LHIN and populations (Table 1). About one in thirteen of adults felt their own mental health status was fair or poor in 2013/14, similar compared to the region and (Table 2). Percentages for those with very good/excellent mental health and fair/poor mental health in our region were similar to other regions in all time periods. Table 1. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Very Good or Excellent, By, 2007 2014 Time period 2007/08 79.5 Δ (74.9, 83.5) 2009/10 76.4 (70.5, 81.4) 2011/12 73.8 (67.3, 79.5) 2013/14 68.4 (61.1, 75.0) 72.1 (69.3, 74.8) 74.2 (70.8, 77.4) 73.4 (69.1, 77.2) 72.0 (68.4, 75.4) Δ Estimate is significantly different from the estimate 75.4 (74.5, 76.2) 74.8 (73.9, 75.7) 72.8 (71.7, 73.8) 71.1 (70.0, 72.1) Table 2. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Fair or Poor, By, 2007 2014 Time period 2007/08 5.6 E (4.0, 8.0) 2009/10 4.7 E (2.8, 7.7) 2011/12 9.3 E (6.1, 13.7) 2013/14 7.5 E (4.5, 12.2) 5.5 (4.4, 6.9) 6.6 (4.8, 9.0) 7.0 E (4.9, 9.8) 7.4 (5.7, 9.6) 5.4 (5.0, 5.9) 5.7 (5.2, 6.1) 6.3 (5.7, 6.8) 6.9 (6.4, 7.5) 1 Self-rated mental health, Prepared by Planning & Evaluation (July 31, 2017)

Self-Rated Mental Health: Gender Data from 2007 to 2014 was combined to analyze self-rated mental health by gender. Similar percentages of males and females felt their mental health was very good or excellent in our region and the region (Table 3). In, about 3% more of the male population felt their mental health was very good or excellent compared to females in. The age-standardized percentage of the adult population who felt their mental health was fair or poor was similar among males and females in all three regions (Table 4). Table 3. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Very Good or Excellent, By Gender &, 2007 2014 Combined Gender Male 73.6 (68.9, 77.9) Female 76.1 (72.0, 79.7) 74.4 (71.9, 76.7) 71.5 (69.1, 73.7) 75.1 (74.4, 75.8) 72.0 (71.3, 72.6) Table 4. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Fair or Poor, By Gender &, 2007 2014 Combined Gender Male 5.8 E (4.1, 8.2) Female 7.0 (5.2, 9.3) Self-Rated Mental Health: Age Group 5.7 (4.6, 7.1) 7.6 (6.2, 9.2) 5.4 (5.1, 5.7) 6.7 (6.4, 7.1) Data from 2007 to 2014 was combined to analyze self-rated mental health by age groups. The age-standardized percentage of the adult population who rated their own mental health as very good/excellent, or fair/poor did not vary significantly by age group in any of the three regions (Tables 5 & 6). Table 5. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Very Good or Excellent, By Age Group &, 2007 2014 Combined Age Group (Years) 18-24 80.8 (72.0, 87.4) 25-44 73.3 (68.2, 77.9) 45-64 75.2 (70.9, 79.1) 65 or older 76.1 (68.4, 82.3) 73.5 (68.7, 77.9) 73.5 (70.6, 76.1) 71.5 (68.9, 74.0) 68.5 (63.9, 72.8) 75.1 (73.8, 76.4) 74.4 (73.6, 75.1) 71.3 (70.4, 72.1) 72.9 (71.5, 74.3) 2 Self-rated mental health, Prepared by Planning & Evaluation (July 31, 2017)

Adjusted Household Income: The population s household income adjusted for family size, divided into three equally sized groups (lowest income, middle income, and highest income). Household income is divided by the squared number of persons in that household, for each person. For example, lowest income represents the one third of households with the lowest income per household size and the third tertile represents the one third of households with the highest income per household size Table 6. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Fair or Poor, By Age Group &, 2007 2014 Combined Age Group (Years) 18-24 F 5.3 E (3.8, 7.4) 25-44 5.8 E 6.7 (3.9, 8.4) (5.1, 8.7) 45-64 7.5 7.4 (5.7, 9.7) (6.3, 8.6) 65 or older F 7.7 E (5.3, 11.2) 5.3 (4.6, 6.0) 5.5 (5.2, 5.9) 7.5 (7.0, 7.9) 5.3 (4.6, 6.1) Self-Rated Mental Health: Adjusted Household Income Data from 2007 to 2014 was combined to analyze self-rated mental health by adjusted household income. In all regions, about three of every five adults living in low income households rated their mental health as very good, significantly lower compared to about four of every five adults in high income households (Table 7). Similarly, about ten in every 100 adults in low income households rated their mental health as fair/poor, compared to about three of every 100 adults in high income households (Table 8). Table 7. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Very Good or Excellent, By Adjusted Household Income Level &, 2007 2014 Combined Income Level North East LHIN Low income 64.9 (58.9, 70.5) Mid income 76.7 (71.9, 80.9) High income 83.5 (78.6, 87.5) 60.2 (56.6, 63.7) 77.3 (74.4, 79.9) 78.4 (75.7, 80.9) 64.5 (63.5, 65.6) 76.1 (75.3, 76.8) U U Estimate for combined sample unavailable as estimate changed significantly between time periods 3 Self-rated mental health, Prepared by Planning & Evaluation (July 31, 2017)

Table 8. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Fair or Poor, By Adjusted Household Income Level &, 2007 2014 Combined Income Level North East LHIN Low income 10.0 12.4 (7.6, 13.0) (10.2, 15.0) Mid income 6.6 E 4.1 (4.2, 10.2) (3.0, 5.5) High income 2.8 E 4.8 E (1.7, 4.4) (3.4, 6.8) 9.8 (9.2, 10.4) 4.7 (4.3, 5.0) U U Estimate for combined sample unavailable as estimate changed significantly between time periods Self-Rated Mental Health: Education Data from 2011 to 2014 was combined to analyze self-rated mental health by highest level of education completed. In all three regions, significantly lower percentages of the adult population rated their mental health as very good or excellent when they had completed less than a high school education compared to the population that had completed a trade, apprenticeship, college, university, or higher education (Table 9). In our region, about eight of every 20 adults who completed less than a high school education rated their mental health as very good/excellent compared to 15 of every 20 adults who completed a trade or higher education. In the region and, significantly higher percentages of the adult population with less than a high school education rated their mental health as fair or poor, compared to the population who had completed a trade education or higher (Table 10). Table 9. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Very Good or Excellent, By Highest Level of Education Completed &, 2011 2014 Combined Education Less than high school 41.8 49.5 (29.1, 55.7) (40.7, 58.3) Completed high school 68.0 67.3 (58.6, 76.0) (60.5, 73.5) Trade/Apprenticeship/ 76.1 77.2 College/University or higher (70.2, 81.1) (74.1, 80.0) 55.6 (51.9, 59.3) 68.3 (66.4, 70.1) 74.6 (73.8, 75.5) Table 10. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Fair or Poor, By Highest Level of Education Completed &, 2011 2014 Combined Education Less than high school F 18.3 (11.6, 27.7) Completed high school 7.3 E 8.7 E (4.4, 12) (4.8, 15.1) Trade/ Apprenticeship/ 7.3 E 5.6 E College/University or higher (4.6, 11.4) (4.3, 7.3) 13.9 (11.9, 16.3) 7.7 (6.7, 8.7) 5.6 (5.2, 6) 4 Self-rated mental health, Prepared by Planning & Evaluation (July 31, 2017)

Self-Rated Mental Health: identity Data from 2011 to 2014 was combined to analyze self-rated mental health by identity completed. The agestandardized percentage of the adult population who rated their mental health as very good or excellent did not vary significantly between those who identified as and those who did not in our region or the region (Table 11). In, a significantly lower percentage of adults who identified as rated their mental health as very good or excellent compared to those who did not identify as. About 12% of adults who identified as rated their mental health as fair or poor, significantly higher compared to those who did not identify as (6%; Table 12). Table 11. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Very Good or Excellent, By Identity, 2011 2014 Combined Identity North East LHIN Identified as 62.0 (50.1, 72.6) 70.2 (62.3, 77.1) 62.9 (59.2, 66.4) Did not identify as 71.9 (66.5, 76.8) 72.8 (69.8, 75.7) * Estimate is significantly different from provincial estimate 72.2 (71.4, 73.0) Table 12. Age-Standardized Percentage (95% CI) of Individuals Aged 18 Years or Older Who Reported Their Own Mental Health Status as Being Fair or Poor, By Identity, 2011 2014 Combined Identity Identified as Did not identify as F 7.5 E (5.3, 10.5) North East LHIN 8.7 E (5.8, 12.7) 7.3 (5.7, 9.3) 12.3 (9.9, 15.1) 6.5 (6.1, 6.9) 5 Self-rated mental health, Prepared by Planning & Evaluation (July 31, 2017)