Left Main PCI vs. CABG: Real World

Similar documents
PCI for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis. Jean Fajadet Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

Left Main Disease: what is left to surgery? Prof. Jacques Monségu CardioVascular Institute Grenoble, France

PCI for LMCA lesions A Review of latest guidelines and relevant evidence

Rationale for Percutaneous Revascularization ESC 2011

Coronary Stent Choice in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Lésions du tronc commun: Reste t il une place pour la chirugie? Pierre Deharo, CHU TIMONE, Marseille

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Controversies in Cardiac Surgery

Drug Eluting Stents Sometimes Fail ESC Stockholm 29 Set 2010 Stent Thrombosis Alaide Chieffo

Quality of Life After Everolimus- Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease:

Assessing Myocardium at Risk: Applying SYNTAX

Mise à Jour sur le traitement du Pluritronculaire Philippe Généreux, MD

Le# Main Interven-on: When Is It Appropriate. Femi Philip, MD Assistant Professor Of Medicine UC Davis

Supplementary Online Content

Important LM bifurcation studies update

Coronary Revascularization for Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Disease: An Overview of Current Evidence and Treatment Strategies

Left Main Intervention: Where are we in 2015?

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

LM stenting - Cypher

Fractional Flow Reserve: Review of the latest data

Unprotected Left Main Stenting: Patient Selection and Recent Experience. Alaide Chieffo. S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Surgical vs. Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome

Long-term outcomes of PCI vs. CABG for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery

Benefit of Performing PCI Based on FFR

NOBLE and EXCEL: The debate for excellence in dealing with left main stenosis

Cite this article as:

FFR in Multivessel Disease

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

PCI vs. CABG From BARI to Syntax, Is The Game Over?

What do the guidelines say?

Management of cardiovascular disease - coronary interventions -

PTCA 1979: : I

Perspective of LM stenting with Current registry and Randomized Clinical Data

PCI or CABG for unprotected left main coronary artery disease? new evidence justifies a change in perspective

Chapter 29 Left Main Intervention in the Light of EXCEL and NOBLE Trials

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

Unprotected LM intervention

Most Patients with Elective Left Main Disease. Farrel Hellig

ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial. Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions

The SYNTAX-LE MANS Study

PCI or CABG for severe unprotected left main coronary artery disease: making sense of the NOBLE and EXCEL trials

Left Main Intervention: Will it become standard of care?

FFR Incorporating & Expanding it s use in Clinical Practice

LEFT MAIN PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION. A/Prof Koh Tian Hai Medical Director National Heart Centre, Singapore

INSIDE INFORMATION YOU CAN T IGNORE

TLR des Stents Actifs

CABG vs PCI: What do the Guidelines Say?

Non-LM bifurcation studies of importance in 2011

Left Main and Bifurcation Summit I. Lessons from European LM Studies

Clinical case in perspective. Cases from Poland

DES in Diabetic Patients

HCS Working Group Seminars Macedonia Pallas Hotel, Friday 21 st February Drug-eluting stents Are they all equal?

Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Swiss Cardiovascular Center and Clinical Trials Unit Bern Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

ΑΝΤΙΜΕΤΩΠΙΣΗ ΑΣΘΕΝΩΝ ΜΕ ΝΟΣΟ ΣΤΕΛΕΦΟΥΣ

PCIs on Intermediate Lesions NCDR Cath-PCI Registry

Clinical Considerations for CTO

Culprit PCI vs MultiVessel PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Balancing Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitors for ACS Patients

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Coronary Artery Stenosis. Insight from MAIN-COMPARE Study

Evidence-Based Management of CAD: Last Decade Trials and Updated Guidelines

Surgery Grand Rounds

Master Class in Preventive Cardiology Focus on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Geneva April

Dauer der doppelten Plättchenhemmung nach AMI / Stent

Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main disease: SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, EXCEL and NOBLE combined cardiology and cardiac surgery perspective

Abbott Vascular. PROTOCOL EXCEL Clinical Trial

Revascularization in Severe LV Dysfunction: The Role of Inducible Ischemia and Viability Testing

FFR and intravascular imaging, which of which?

Left Main PCI. Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR. Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD

Patients in whom PCI is preferred over CABG _ Aleksander Ernst Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb University of Zagreb School of Medicine Zagreb, CROATIA

TRATAMIENTO INVASIVO ENFERMEDAD ISQUEMICA ESTABLE. Jonathan Poveda CLINICA BIBLICA 2015

VCU Pauley Heart Center: A 2009 US News Top 50 Heart and Heart Surgery Hospital

Fractional Flow Reserve: Basics, FAME 1, FAME 2. William F. Fearon, MD Associate Professor Stanford University Medical Center

Stent Thrombosis: Patient, Procedural, and Stent Factors. Eugene Mc Fadden Cork, Ireland

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

7-Year Follow-up From a Randomized Trial of Sirolimus-Eluting vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (RESET)

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

Drug eluting stents From revolution to evolution. Current limitations

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Long-Term Outcome in Coronary Bypass Candidates Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease: a focus on physiology

Αγγειοπλαστική σε Nόσο Στελέχους: Που βρισκόμαστε. Βάιος Τζίφος Δ/ντής Τμήματος Επεμβατικής Καρδιολογίας Τομέας Καρδιάς Ερρίκος Ντυνάν Hospital Center

Coronary Artery Disease: Revascularization (Teacher s Guide)

ΑΓΓΕΙΟΠΛΑΣΤΙΚΗ ΣΤΟ ΔΙΑΒΗΤΙΚΟ ΑΣΘΕΝΗ

Advances in Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. No disclosure or conflicts. Outline

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

Michael Mack, M.D. Baylor Healthcare System Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Dallas, TX

D. D. TSIKADERIS MD, FESC SAINT LUKES THESSALONIKI

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

Razionale ed evidenze scientifiche di Doppia Antiaggregazione Piastrinica a lungo termine nel Paziente con Sindrome Coronarica Acuta

FFR-Guided PCI. 4 th Imaging and Physiology Summit October 29 th, 2010 Seoul, Korea. Stanford

Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Low Predictive Risk of Mortality

Upgrade of Recommendation

ΑΝΤΙΓΝΩΜΙΕΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΠΕΜΒΑΤΙΚΗ ΚΑΡΔΙΟΛΟΓΙΑ:Νόσος στελέχους Αγγειοπλαστική

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Angioplastica coronarica nel paziente anziano ad alto rischio emorragico

Incidence and Treatment for LM In-Stent

Transcription:

Management of Patients with Stable CAD Left Main PCI vs. CABG: Real World Marco Roffi, MD, FESC University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland

SYNTAX-LMT The SYNTAX trial included a pre-specified subgroup of 705 patients with predominant distal LM disease, who were randomly assigned to CABG or PCI using early generation drug eluting stent (paclitaxel-eluting stent). At 5 years of follow-up, the primary end point was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which included all-cause death, cerebrovascular accident/stroke, MI, and repeat revascularizations Morice MC et al Circulation. 2014;129:2388-2394

Morice MC et al Circulation. 2014;129:2388-2394

SYNTAX-LMT At 5 years follow-up CABG PCI CABG PCI P=NS P<0.001 26.7% 36.9% 31.0% 15.5% P=0.03 14.6% 12.8% 4.3% 1.5% 4.8% 8.2% Death Stroke MI Repeat Revascularization MACCE n:705 MACCE: All-cause death, cerebrovascular accident/stroke, MI, and repeat revascularizations

MACCE 31.5% SYNTAX-LMT CABG PCI P=NS 32.3% 32.7% 30.4% Low SYNTAX Score Mohr FW Lancet 2013; 381: 629 38 Intermediate SYNTAX Score low 22, intermediate 23 32, and high 33

SYNTAX SCORE 33 MACCE CABG CABG PCI 34.1% PCI P=0.11 P=0.003 20.9% 14.1% 29.7% 11.6% 46.5% P<0.001 P=0.13 4.9% 1.6% Mortality Repeat revascularization Stroke Morice MC et al Circulation. 2014;129:2388-2394 MACCE: All-cause death, cerebrovascular accident/stroke, MI, and repeat revascularizations

PRECOMBAT The PRECOMBAT trial randomized 600 patients with LM disease and a mean SYNTAX score of 25 to CABG or PCI using early generation DES (sirolimus-eluting stent). At 5 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint was death, MI, stroke, or target vessel repeat revascularization Ahn JM Am Coll Cardiol 2015 May 26;65(20):2198-206

14.3% PRECOMBAT CABG The incidence of stroke was similar for PCI (0.7%) and 17.5% CABG (0.7%) in contrast to the findings in SYNTAX n:600 PCI P=NS 9.6% 8.4% Primary Endpoint PE: Death, MI, stroke, or target vessel repeat revascularization Death, MI or Stroke Ahn JM Am Coll Cardiol 2015 May 26;65(20):2198-206

Ahn JM Am Coll Cardiol 2015 May 26;65(20):2198-206

Pooled analysis of SYNTAX and PRECOMBAT At 5 years of follow-up 15.1% P=NS 14.0% CABG PCI 19.5% P<0.001 10.8% Death, MI and Stroke Repeat revascularization Cavalcante R et al J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):999-1009

EXCEL The EXCEL trial compared CABG with PCI using new generation DES (everolimus-eluting stent) among 1905 patients with significant LM disease on coronary angiography with evidence of invasive or non invasive ischaemia treated between 2010 and 2014. Although complex LM disease defined as a SYNTAX score > 32 constituted an exclusion criterion, the distribution of SYNTAX score tertiles according to the Core laboratory evaluation were 36%, 40% and 24% for low ( 22), intermediate (23 32) and high ( 33) SYNTAX scores, respectively. At 3 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint was death, stroke or MI Stone GW N Engl J Med 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2223-2235

N=1905 P=NS EXCEL CABG PCI From 3015.4% days to 3 years 14.7% At 3 years of follow-up 11.5% P=0.02 P<0.001 Primary endpoint: 12.9% death, stroke or MI 7.9% P=0.03 6.0% P=0.07 3.8% 4.3% 2.7% 7.6% Death, stroke and MI Peri-procedural Primary Endpoint Spontaneous MI MI Repeat Revascularization Stone GW N Engl J Med 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2223-2235

Stone GW N Engl J Med 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2223-2235

NOBLE The NOBLE trial compared CABG with PCI using new generation DES (biolimus-eluting stent*) among 1201 patients with significant LM disease (mean SYNTAX score of 23) treated between 2008 and 2015. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, the primary endpoint was death, non-procedural MI, stroke and repeat revascularization. Mäkikallio T et al Lancet 2016; 388: 2743 52

NOBLE No significant differences in the incidence of all-cause CABG PCI and cardiac death At a median follow-up of 3.1 years CABG 28.0% PCI P=0.03 P=0.004 n:1201 18.0% P=0.004 10.0% 15.0% 6.0% 2.0% Primary Endpoint Non procedural MI Death, non-procedural Repeat MI, stroke and repeat revascularization Mäkikallio T et al Lancet 2016; 388: 2743 52

Mäkikallio T et al Lancet 2016; 388: 2743 52

Meta analysis SYNTAX (LMCA Cohort) PRECOMBAT EXCEL NOBLE Primary Endpoint: Composite of allcause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke Giacoppo D et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(10):1079-1088

Meta analysis All-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at long-term follow-up Giacoppo D et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(10):1079-1088

Impact of Operator Experience/Volume on Outcomes After LMT PCI Pts treated by experienced operators had more complex/extensive CAD Adjusted risks for cardiac death lower for pts treated by experienced operators Unprotected LM PCI at a single institution Experienced/high-volume 30-day HR 0.22 (95% LM CI: operator: 0.09 to >15 0.59), LM p PCI/y = 0.003 for >3 consecutive years 1948 patients treated in 8 y = 243 pts/y! 3-year HR: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.29 to 0.84); Xu B et p = al. 0.009 J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2016;9:2086 93

IVUS Guidance for LMT PCI: Pooled Analysis of Patient-Level Data 4 registries, N=1,670, analysis on N=505 (30.2%) with PCI under IVUS guidance and matched with N=505 without IVUS guidance de la Torre Hernandez JM et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2014;7:244 54

IVUS Guidance for LMT PCI: Pooled Analysis of Patient-Level Data Pooled analysis suggests an association of IVUS guidance with better outcomes in LMT PCI de la Torre Hernandez JM et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2014;7:244 54

IRIS-MAIN registry A total of 3,504 consecutive patients with LMCAD treated with CABG (n = 1,301) or PCI with DES (n = 2,203) Matched cohorts (N=2x950) Lee PH et al. Am Heart J 2017;193:76-83

ESC 2014 Recommendations in patients with SCAD, LMT disease, suitable anatomy for both procedures and low predicted surgical mortality Windecker at al. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541-619