egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Similar documents
Effect of Saxagliptin on Renal Outcomes in the SAVOR TIMI- 53 study- Appendixes:

Supplementary Appendix

Online Appendix (JACC )

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Supplementary Online Content

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Supplementary Table 1. Baseline Characteristics by Quintiles of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

Lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients with type 2

ADVANCE post trial ObservatioNal Study

No Increased Cardiovascular Risk for Lixisenatide in ELIXA

Soo LIM, MD, PHD Internal Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial: Design and results. David Fitchett, MD University of Toronto, Canada

Cardiovascular Diabetology. Open Access ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. C. R. L. Cardoso 1, N. C. Leite 1, C. B. M. Moram 2 and G. F.

Updates in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Management: Are You Making the Link?

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2

Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.

Gli endpoint micro-vascolari nei trial di outcome cardiovascolare

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

1. Albuminuria an early sign of glomerular damage and renal disease. albuminuria

CARDIO-RENAL SYNDROME

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Lipoprotein(a), PCSK9 Inhibition and Cardiovascular Risk: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

Canagliflozin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the CANVAS Program

Supplement materials:

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

CANVAS Program Independent commentary

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

Data Analysis Plan for assessing clinical efficacy and safety of ER niacin/laropiprant in the HPS2-THRIVE trial

CKD FOR INTERNISTS. Dr Ahmed Hossain Associate professor Medicine Sir Salimullah Medical College

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Effective and Safe Management of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease Using Sitagliptin

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

Supplementary Appendix

Supplementary appendix

Supplementary Online Content

Diabetes and kidney disease.

Predicting and changing the future for people with CKD

PROTEZIONE DAL DANNO RENALE NEL DIABETE TIPO 2: RUOLO DEI NUOVI FARMACI. Massimo Boemi UOC Malattie Metaboliche e Diabetologia IRCCS INRCA Ancona

< N=248 N=296

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Renal tubular secretion in chronic kidney disease: description, determinants, and outcomes. Astrid M Suchy-Dicey

Hypertension Management in Diabetic Patients

Supplementary Online Content

Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) AHA Nov 18, 2014 Update on Randomized Trials

Kidney and heart: dangerous liaisons. Luis M. RUILOPE (Madrid, Spain)

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

EDMS #4298 Version 1.0

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

LEADER Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Diabete: terapia nei pazienti a rischio cardiovascolare

Diabetes and the Heart

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

Fasting or non fasting?

Protecting the heart and kidney: implications from the SHARP trial

Supplemental Table 1. Standardized Serum Creatinine Measurements. Supplemental Table 3. Sensitivity Analyses with Additional Mortality Outcomes.

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

Supplementary Table 1. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics (treated patients).

Table S1: Diagnosis and Procedure Codes Used to Ascertain Incident Hip Fracture

Variability in drug response: towards more personalized diabetes care Petrykiv, Sergei

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Adult Diabetes Clinician Guide NOVEMBER 2017

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

Oral Hypoglycemics and Risk of Adverse Cardiac Events: A Summary of the Controversy

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment. ACE Inhibitor and Angiotensin II Antagonist Combination Treatment GUIDELINES

Dapagliflozin and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from DECLARE-TIMI 58

Effects of Lowering LDL Cholesterol on Progression of Kidney Disease

Management of Type 2 Diabetes Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Tom Blevins MD Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology Austin, Texas

Prevention And Treatment of Diabetic Nephropathy. MOH Clinical Practice Guidelines 3/2006 Dr Stephen Chew Tec Huan

Cardiologists and HbA1c: Novel Diabetes Drugs and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes

Aldosterone Antagonism in Heart Failure: Now for all Patients?

Cardiovascular Benefits of Two Classes of Antihyperglycemic Medications

SPRINT: Consequences for CKD patients

E.Ritz Heidelberg (Germany)

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Empagliflozin: Role in Treatment Options for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Metabolic Syndrome and Chronic Kidney Disease

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. Supplementary Figure S1. Cohort definition flow chart.

T. Suithichaiyakul Cardiomed Chula

Effective Health Care Program

Συμπεράσματα από τις νέες μελέτες για την αρτηριακή υπέρταση (SPRINT,PATHAY 2,HOPE 3)

Can We Reduce Heart Failure by Treating Diabetes? CVOT Data on SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1Receptor Agonists

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

RAS Blockade Across the CV Continuum

University of Groningen. Evaluation of renal end points in nephrology trials Weldegiorgis, Misghina Tekeste

Life After CORAL: What Did CORAL Prove? David Paul Slovut, MD, PhD Co-director TAVR, Dir of Advanced Intervention

Methods. Background and Objectives STRADIVARIUS

(n=6279). Continuous variables are reported as mean with 95% confidence interval and T1 T2 T3. Number of subjects

Transcription:

Saxagliptin and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Moderate or Severe Renal Impairment: Observations from the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial Supplementary Table 1. Characteristics according to Renal Function Characteristic egfr > 50 (n = 13,916) egfr 50 (n = 2,576) Demographic Characteristics Age years, Median (IQR) 64.0 (59.0-70.0) 70.0 (64.0-75.0) <.0001 Female sex, n(%) 4,355 (31.3%) 1,100 (42.7%) <.0001 Weight kg, Median (IQR) 86.1 (74.8-99.8) 85.0 (73.2-99.5) 0.03 Body-mass index - kg/m 2, Median (IQR) 30.4 (27.2-34.3) 31.0 (27.6-35.1) <.0001 Past Medical History Duration of diabetes, Median (IQR) 10.0 (4.9-15.8) 13.6 (7.8-20.7) <.0001 Established atherosclerotic disease, n(%) 10,809 (77.7%) 2,150 (83.5%) <.0001 Hypertension, n(%) 11,301 (81.2%) 2,191 (85.1%) <.0001 Dyslipidemia, n(%) 9,760 (70.1%) 1,979 (76.8%) <.0001 Prior myocardial infarction, n(%) 5,209 (37.4%) 1,028 (39.9%) 0.02 Prior heart failure, n(%) 1,577 (11.3%) 528 (20.5%) <.0001 Prior coronary revascularization, n(%) 5,900 (42.4%) 1,223 (47.5%) <.0001 Clinical and Laboratory Measurements Systolic blood pressure mmhg, Median (IQR) 136.5 (125.0-147.0) 137.0 (125.0-148.5) 0.18 Diastolic blood pressure mmhg, Median 80.0 (71.5-85.5) 77.0 (69.0-83.5) 0.0001 (IQR) HbA1c (%), Median (IQR) 7.6 (6.9-8.7) 7.6 (6.9-8.7) 0.24 HbA1c (mmol/mol), Median (IQR) 60 (52-72) 60 (52-72) 0.24 Fasting serum glucose (mg/dl), Median (IQR) 146.0 (120.0-183.0) 139.0 (110.0-178.0) <.0001 Estimated glomerular filtration rate ml/min, 75.6 (64.3-89.5) 41.4 (34.7-46.1) <.0001 Median (IQR) Albumin/creatinine ratio mg/mmol, Median 1.6 (0.7-6.0) 5.9 (1.4-38.1) <.0001 (IQR) Albumin/creatinine ratio, n(%) <.0001 < 3.4 mg/mmol 8,691 (65.3%) 1,005 (41.2%) 3.4-33.9 mg/mmol 3,624 (27.2%) 802 (32.9%) > 33.9 mg/mmol 1,004 (7.5%) 634 (26.0%) Baseline Cardiovascular Medications Aspirin, n(%) 10,501 (75.5%) 1,903 (73.9%) 0.09 Statins, n(%) 10,814 (77.7%) 2,103 (81.6%) <.0001 Beta-Blockers, n(%) 8,379 (60.2%) 1,783 (69.2%) <.0001 Diuretics, n(%) 5,503 (39.5%) 1,695 (65.8%) <.0001 ACE Inhibitors, n(%) 7,611 (54.7%) 1,329 (51.6%) 0.004 Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, n(%) 3,708 (26.6%) 887 (34.4%) <.0001 Calcium antagonists, n(%) 4,312 (31.0%) 1,066 (41.4%) <.0001 Baseline Anti-hyperglycemic Medications Metformin, n(%) 10,355 (74.4%) 1,118 (43.4%) <.0001 Sulfonylurea, n(%) 5,702 (41.0%) 931 (36.1%) <.0001 Thiazolidinediones, n(%) 831 (6.0%) 147 (5.7%) 0.60 Insulin, n(%) 5,380 (38.7%) 1,452 (56.4%) <.0001 None, n(%) 632 (4.5%) 103 (4.0%) 0.22 Abbreviations: egfr, estimated glomerular filtration rate, presented as ml/min/1.73m 2. P

Supplementary Table 2. Association of Renal Function and Cardiovascular Endpoints Adjusted for Clinical Findings and Urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio Outcome Hazard Ratio (95% CI) egfr > 50 egfr 30-50 P egfr < 30 P CV Death, MI, Ischemic Stroke Referent 1.17 (1.00-1.37) 0.042 1.53 (1.13-2.02) 0.004 Hosp. for HF Referent 1.78 (1.43-2.20) <0.001 2.56 (1.77-3.60) <0.001 Patients are categorized into normal or mildly impaired renal function (egfr >50 ml/min/1.73m 2 ); moderate renal impairment (egfr 30-50 ml/min/1.73m 2 ); or severe renal impairment (egfr <30 ml/min/1.73m 2 ). Covariates in the model include age, sex, current tobacco use, history of hypertension, history of hypercholesterolemia, prior cardiovascular disease, prior heart failure, and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Supplementary Table 3. Two-Year Cardiovascular Endpoints According to Renal Function Endpoint egfr > 50 ml/min/1.73m2 egfr 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 P Interaction Saxagliptin Placebo Hazard Ratio P Saxagliptin Placebo Hazard Ratio P 5 mg (n = 6986) (n = 6930) (95% CI) 2.5 mg (n = 1294) (n = 1282) (95% CI) CV Death, MI, Ischemic Stroke 6.55% 6.28% 1.01 (0.88-1.15) 0.93 11.5% 12.3% 0.97 (0.78-1.22) 0.82 0.82 CV Death, MI, Ischemic Stroke, Hosp. for HF, Coronary 11.7% 11.1% 1.03 (0.93-1.13) 0.61 19.0% 19.5% 1.00 (0.84-1.19) 0.98 0.80 Revascularization, UA CV Death 2.59% 2.28% 1.06 (0.86-1.31) 0.58 6.53% 6.53% 0.98 (0.73-1.31) 0.87 0.66 MI 2.74% 3.06% 0.88 (0.73-1.07) 0.21 5.67% 5.18% 1.16 (0.82-1.63) 0.40 0.17 Ischemic Stroke 1.94% 1.63% 1.12 (0.88-1.44) 0.36 1.79% 1.88% 1.03 (0.59-1.82) 0.91 0.79 Hosp. for HF 2.46% 1.97% 1.23 (0.99-1.55) 0.06 9.09% 7.22% 1.32 (1.00-1.74) 0.047 0.70 Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; egfr, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hosp., hospitalization; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction.

Supplementary Table 4. Frequency of Progressive Microalbuminuria by Completion of Follow-up According to Renal Function Total Worsened No Change Improved N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) P-value* egfr > 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 (n = 10,621) <0.0001 Saxagliptin 5,380 (50.7%) 682 (12.7%) 4,139 (76.9%) 559 (10.4%) Placebo 5,241 (49.3%) 790 (15.1%) 4,003 (76.4%) 448 (8.5%) egfr 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 (n = 1739) 0.041 Saxagliptin 885 (50.9%) 151 (17.1%) 623 (70.4%) 111 (12.5%) Placebo 854 (49.1%) 179 (21.0%) 591 (69.2%) 84 (9.8%) The risk of progressive microalbuminuria was defined as a treatment difference in the number and proportion of patients with worsening, no change, or improvement in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), defined as a shift from baseline category (<3.4, 3.4 to 33.9, or >33.9 mg/mmol) over the duration of follow-up among patients with complete data. *P-values based on chi-square or Fisher s exact test.

Supplementary Table 5. Frequency of Renal and Glycemic Endpoints According to Renal Function Endpoint egfr > 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 egfr 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 P Interaction Saxagliptin Placebo Hazard Ratio Saxagliptin Placebo Hazard Ratio 5 mg (n = 6986) (n = 6930) (95% CI) 2.5 mg (n = 1294) (n = 1282) (95% CI) Doubling of Serum Creatinine, Dialysis, Renal Transplant, 1.50% 1.22% 1.10 (0.83-1.44) 5.80% 6.16% 1.06 (0.78-1.44) 0.90 Serum Creatinine >6 mg/dl Doubling of Serum Creatinine, Dialysis, Renal Transplant, Serum Creatinine >6 mg/dl, Death 5.24% 4.41% 1.10 (0.95-1.27) 13.9% 13.7% 1.06 (0.86-1.29) 0.78 Hosp. for Hypoglycemia 0.44% 0.30% 1.44 (0.84-2.52) 1.65% 1.82% 0.99 (0.54-1.82) 0.36 Major Hypoglycemia 1.45% 1.30% 1.11 (0.84-1.47) 5.60% 3.70% 1.58 (1.10-2.30) 0.13 Initiation of Insulin Therapy 5.24% 7.66% 0.67 (0.59-0.77) 7.14% 8.60% 0.87 (0.66-1.16) 0.10 Addition or Increase of Any New Anti-Hyperglycemic Medication (including Insulin) 24.4% 30.1% 0.77 (0.72-0.82) 20.0% 24.9% 0.81 (0.69-0.96) 0.60 Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; Hosp., hospitalization; egfr, estimated glomerular filtration rate. Interaction P-values based on categorical egfr groups. Supplementary Table 6. Frequency of Adverse Events According to Renal Function Safety Endpoint egfr > 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 egfr 30-50 ml/min/1.73m 2 egfr < 30 ml/min/1.73m 2 Saxagliptin Placebo P Value* Saxagliptin Placebo P Value* Saxagliptin Placebo P Value* 5 mg (n = 6930) 2.5 mg (n = 1118) 2.5 mg (n = 164) (n = 6986) (n = 1122) (n = 172) Any Adverse Event 5079 (72.7%) 5054 (72.9%) 0.76 869 (77.5%) 866 (77.5%) 0.996 152 (88.4%) 126 (76.8%) 0.006 Total Number of Events 24,797 24,815 5,448 4,770 749 764 Any Severe Adverse Event 1645 (23.5%) 1591 (23.0%) 0.41 403 (35.9%) 412 (36.9%) 0.65 81 (47.1%) 70 (42.7%) 0.42 Total Number of Events 2887 2858 866 807 156 185 *P-values based on chi-square or Fisher s exact test.

Supplementary Figure 1. Two-year event rates for the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke in patients stratified by renal function and cardiovascular disease status. Patients are categorized dichotomously into moderate-to-severe renal impairment (egfr 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 ) or not (egfr >50 ml/min/1.73m 2 ); with or without a prior history of established cardiovascular disease. Abbreviations: CV indicates cardiovascular; egfr, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MI, myocardial infarction.

Supplementary Figure 2. Relationship between egfr and the risk of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke The solid lines represent the adjusted point estimates for the risk of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, or ischemic stroke by egfr, presented as ml/min/1.73m 2 ; black represents all patients, red represents patients assigned to saxagliptin, and blue represents patients assigned to placebo. The y-axis represents the log hazard ratio of the composite outcome. The red dotted line represents the reference level of egfr 86 ml/min/1.73m 2. The cubic spline function was adjusted for age, sex, current tobacco use, and history of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, established cardiovascular disease, and heart failure. Abbreviations: CV indicates cardiovascular; egfr, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MI, myocardial infarction.

Supplementary Figure 3. Effect of saxagliptin on the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients categorized by estimated GFR. Patients are categorized according to baseline renal function as normal or mildly impaired (egfr > 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 ; N=13,916) or moderate-tosevere renal impairment (egfr 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 ; N=2576). Patients are categorized according to baseline renal function as normal or mildly impaired (egfr > 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 ; N=13,916) or moderate-to-severe renal impairment (egfr 50 ml/min/1.73m 2 ; N=2576). Shown are Kaplan-Meier (KM) rate estimates of each cardiovascular endpoint through 2 years in saxagliptin (S) and placebo (P) arms, respectively. The squares indicate the point estimate, and horizontal lines indicate the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the effect in each subgroup. Abbreviations: CV indicates cardiovascular; Cor. Revasc., coronary revascularization; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; hosp., hospitalization; egfr, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MI, myocardial infarction; UA, unstable angina. Interaction P-values based on categorical egfr groups.