FAX, A FEMALE ADULT VOXEL PHANTOM FOR RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY

Similar documents
Comparison of organ doses estimations in radiology with PCXMC application based on MIRD phantoms and CALDose-X application based on voxel phantoms

2005 RECOMMENDATIONS OF ICRP

Impact of ICRP-89 Based Models on Dose Estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals and CT Exams

ICRP = International Commission on. recommendations and guidance on. Functioning since 1928.

Dosimetry of recently introduced CBCT Units for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Assessment of effective dose in paediatric CT examinations

ICRP Recommendations Evolution or Revolution? John R Cooper Main Commission

Radiation Dosimetry for CT Protocols

Radiation Protection Program Update: The Details. July 2010

Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection

Dosimetric Consideration in Diagnostic Radiology

Skyscan 1076 in vivo scanning: X-ray dosimetry

CALDose_X a software tool for absorbed dose calculations in diagnostic radiology

A Probabilistic Approach for the Assessment of Internal Dose to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Precursor Cells

Radiological Protection Countermeasures after TEPCO Fukushima NPP Accident -Who should play the role of risk communication-

Organ Dose Variability with Gender, Age and BMI

MAX06 and FAX06: Update of two adult human phantoms for radiation protection dosimetry

PHY138Y Nuclear and Radiation

Learning Objectives. Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection. Radiation Effects

Posture-specific phantoms representing female and male adults in Monte Carlo-based simulations for radiological protection

Measurement of organ dose in abdomen-pelvis CT exam as a function of ma, KV and scanner type by Monte Carlo method

Impact of ICRP-89 Based Models on Dose Estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals and CT Exams. Stabin MG, Kost SD, Clark JH, Pickens DR, Price RR, Carver DE

CT Radiation Dosimetry Study Using Monte Carlo Simulation and. Computational Anthropomorphic Phantoms

Radiation Safety Information for Students in Courses given by the Nuclear Physics Group at KTH, Stockholm, Sweden

IMPC phenotyping SOPs in JMC

Whole-body biodistribution and radiation dosimetry estimates for the β-amyloid radioligand [ 11 C]MeS-IMPY in non-human primates

Figure 1.1 PHITS geometry for PTB irradiations with: broad beam, upper panel; mono energetic beams, lower panel. Pictures of the setups and of the

Estimation of Effective Doses for Radiation Cancer Risks on ISS, Lunar and Mars Missions with Space Radiation Measurements

Effective Dose Conversion Coefficients for X-ray Radiographs of the Chest and the Abdomen

A Monte Carlo Study for Photoneutron Dose Estimations around the High-Energy Linacs

MT09 - Normal Human Tissue Microarray, FDA

Recent Progress in Radiation Dosimetry for Epidemiology and Radiological Protection. John Harrison ICRP Committee 2

[Setawati et. al., Vol.4 (Iss10): October, 2017] ISSN: DOI: /zenodo

A Real-Time Monte Carlo System for Internal Dose Evaluation Using an Anthropomorphic Phantom with Different Shapes of Tumors Inserted

Austin Radiological Association Nuclear Medicine Procedure PET SODIUM FLUORIDE BONE SCAN (F-18 NaF)

CT Dose Estimation. John M. Boone, Ph.D., FAAPM, FSBI, FACR Professor and Vice Chair of Radiology. University of California Davis Medical Center

Dosimetry - Measurement of Ionising Radiation

Ask EuroSafe Imaging Tips & Tricks. CT Working Group

Machine Learning Powered Automatic Organ Classification for Patient Specific Organ Dose Estimation

CALDose_X online: Web-based, real time Monte Carlo calculations for patient dosimetry in X-ray diagnosis

Use Of MCNP With Voxel-Based Image Data For Internal Dosimetry Applications

MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS FOR HOMELAND SECURITY USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty.

APPENDIX G - Organ/Tissue Weighting Factors and Detriment/Risk Coefficients

Determination of the conversion factor for the estimation of effective dose in lungs, urography and cardiac procedures

Amira K. Brown, Ph.D. Molecular Imaging Branch, NIMH Bldg. 1 Rm. B3-10

Estimating Patient Radiation Dose from Computed Tomography

Monte Carlo Modelling: a reliable and efficient tool in radiation dosimetry

Risks from Internal Emitters - misuse of equivalent and effective dose

Austin Radiological Association Ga-68 NETSPOT (Ga-68 dotatate)

Estimation of Organ and Effective Doses for Neonate and Infant Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterizations

Assessment of radiation risk to pediatric patients undergoing conventional X-ray examinations

Effective dose from direct and indirect digital panoramic units

CS 6824: Tissue-Based Map of the Human Proteome

ALTERNATIVES TO THE EFFECTIVE DOSE FOR STOCHASTIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN MEDICAL IMAGING

Non-target dose from radiotherapy: Magnitude, Evaluation, and Impact. Stephen F. Kry, Ph.D., D.ABR.

GUIDELINES ON IONISING RADIATION DOSE LIMITS AND ANNUAL LIMITS ON INTAKE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

3 rd International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection Seoul, October John Harrison

Dosimetry comparison of orthovoltage x-ray and 137 Cs irradiation of the murine bone marrow compartment Matthew Belley

A more accurate method to estimate patient dose during body CT examinations with tube current modulation

Lu-DOTATATE PRRT dosimetry:

An Assessment of Organ and Effective Dose of Patients who Undertake CT Examinations in two Teaching Hospitals of Mashhad&Isfahan

INTRODUCTION TO ANIMALS

Introduction. Measurement of Secondary Radiation for Electron and Proton Accelerators. Introduction - Photons. Introduction - Neutrons.

Medical Physics 4 I3 Radiation in Medicine

7/4/2018. Key Objectives. A and P 2401 Lecture 2 TWO MECHANISMS USED TO MAINTAIN HOMEOSTASIS. Negative Feedback Examples. Review of Homeostasis

Colour on-line figures None Colour print figures None

Radiation Safety. Bethany Gillett 14th Feb After this lecture, you should be able to:

Equivalent dose to organs and tissues in Hysterosalpingography calculated with the FAX (Female Adult voxel) phantom

Patient / Organ Dose in CT

Estimated Radiation Dose Associated With Low-Dose Chest CT of Average-Size Participants in the National Lung Screening Trial

Study of the Influence of Radionuclide Biokinetic Distribution in Human Body on the Efficiency Response of Lung Counters

Cancer in Estonia 2014

A REVISED MODEL FOR DOSIMETRY IN THE HUMAN SMALL INTESTINE. Final Progress Report

study of body structure & Physiology study of body function

ICRP RECOMMENDATIONS AND IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS: THEN AND NOW

Calculation of Normalised Organ and Effective Doses to Adult Reference Computational Phantoms from Contemporary Computed Tomography Scanners

Out-of-field organ doses from therapeutic irradiation during childhood: is there an excess risk for second cancer induction?

Radiation Safety for New Medical Physics Graduate Students

The ANDANTE project: a multidisciplinary approach to neutron RBE

Risk of Secondary Fatal Malignancies from Hi-Art Tomotherapy

Dosimetry in digital mammography

Republican Research and Practical Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology. Ilya Veyalkin Head of Laboratory of Epidemiology Gomel, Belarus

Application of MCNP4C Monte Carlo code in radiation dosimetry in heterogeneous phantom

ICRP-ERPW Symposium. Paris, October10-12, Chan Hyeong Kim Hanyang University

SHN-1 Human Digestive Panel Test results

INTEREST GRABBER NOTEBOOK #1

Radiopharmaceuticals. Radionuclides in NM. Radionuclides NUCLEAR MEDICINE. Modes of radioactive decays DIAGNOSTIC THERAPY CHEMICAL COMPOUND

Overview of Anatomy & Physiology

Human Body Systems Pre-AP Project

Dose distribution and dosimetry parameters calculation of MED3633 palladium-103 source in water phantom using MCNP

Estimating Testicular Cancer specific Mortality by Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Registry

Intro to Animal Structure & Function

WLH Tumor Frequencies between cohort enrollment and 31-Dec Below the Women Lifestyle and Health tumor frequencies are tabulated according to:

Outline. Chapter 12 Treatment Planning Combination of Beams. Opposing pairs of beams. Combination of beams. Opposing pairs of beams

Biology Anatomy and Physiology I. Learn and Understand. What is Biology? bios = life -ology = study of

Comparison of dosimetry parameters of two commercially available Iodine brachytherapy seeds using Monte Carlo calculations

Figure 3. DS02 point-wise kerma coefficients (see Table 2) and DS02 fine group kerma coefficients (see Table 5) for photons in soft tissue.

Multi-normal human tissues, FDA, 96 samples, 35 organs/sites from three individuals (1.5mm)

State of the art and future development for standardized estimation of organ doses in CT

Human Anatomy and Physiology (ANAT 5) Mrs. Fulton Phone: ext. 6049

Transcription:

EFFECTIVE DOSE RATIOS FOR THE TOMOGRAPHIC MAX AND FAX PHANTOMS ******************************************************** EFFECTIVE DOSE RATIOS FOR TOMOGRAPHIC AND STYLIZED MODELS FROM > EXTERNAL EXPOSURE TO PHOTONS > EXTERNAL EXPOSURE TO ELECTRONS > INTERNAL EXPOSURE TO PHOTONS > INTERNAL EXPOSURE TO ELECTRONS ************************************************************************ FAX, A FEMALE ADULT VOXEL PHANTOM FOR RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY

The main protection quantity (ICRP 60) : Effective Dose E = Σ w T H T H T = Equivalent Dose to Tissue T W T = Tissue Weighting Factor for Tissue T

Remainder equivalent dose: External exposure: Arithmetic average equivalent dose of the 10 organs and tissues Internal exposures: Mass-weighted average equivalent dose of the 10 organs and tissues Footnote 3 of table 2 from ICRP60

ADAM and EVA phantoms

MAX phantom

FAX phantom

Exposure conditions Irradiation with a broad beam of photons covering the whole body from the front (AP), from the back (PA) and rotating 360 0 around the vertical axis of the body Incident energies from 10 kev to 10 MeV Cut-off energies: photons = 2 kev, electrons = 10 MeV and 200 kev Effective dose calculated according to ICRP74

1.4 EXTERNAL EXPOSURE TO PHOTONS Ratio of effective doses 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 MAX-FAX / ADEV (ICRP74) 0.4 30 kev 0.01 0.1 1 10 Photon Energy (MeV) AP-EGS4 PA-EGS4 AP-MCNP4C PA-MCNPC ROT-EGS4 Replacement of the ADAM-EVA by the MAX-FAX exposure model

Exposure conditions Irradiation with a broad beam of electrons covering the whole body from the front (AP), from the back (PA) and rotating 360 0 around the vertical axis of the body Incident energies from 0.1 MeV to 10 MeV Cut-off energies: photons = 2 kev, electrons = 8 kev for E< 1 MeV and 200 kev for E> 1MeV Effective dose calculated according to ICRP74

1.4 EXTERNAL EXPOSURE TO ELECTRONS Ratio of effective doses 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 MAX-FAX / ADEV 0.4 0.1 1 10 Electron Energy (MeV) AP-EGS4 PA-EGS4 AP-MCNP4 ROT-EGS4 Replacement of the ADAM-EVA by the MAX-FAX exposure model

Exposure conditions Irradiation from photon emitters homogeneously distributed in the liver, the lungs, the skeleton and the thyroid. Incident energies from 10 kev to 4 MeV Cut-off energies: photons = 2 kev, electrons = 4 MeV Effective dose calculated according to ICRP68 and footnote 3 of table 2 from ICRP60

1.6 EGS4 INTERNAL EXPOSURE TO PHOTONS Ratio of effective doses 1.4 1.2 1 MAX-FAX / ADEV 0.8 0.01 0.1 1 10 Photon Energy (MeV) LIVER LUNGS SKELETON THYROID Replacement of the ADAM-EVA by the MAX-FAX exposure model

Exposure conditions Irradiation from electron emitters homogeneously distributed in the kidneys, the spleen and the skeleton. Incident energies from 0.1 MeV to 4 MeV Cut-off energies: photons = 2 kev, electrons 8 kev for E<1 MeV and 200 kev for E>1 MeV Effective dose calculated according to ICRP68 and footnote 3 of table 2 from ICRP60

1.2 INTERNAL EXPOSURE TO ELECTRONS Ratio of effective doses 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 MAX-FAX / ADEV EGS4 0.6 0.1 1 10 Photon Energy (MeV) KIDNEYS SKELETON SPLEEN Replacement of the ADAM-EVA by the MAX-FAX exposure model

Conclusions Regardless of exposure conditions beyond those considered in this study, one can observe that the effective dose would change between +60% and 50% because of the replacement of the ADAM- EVA exposure model by the MAX-FAX exposure model. This margin does not include additional changes from replacing a Monte Carlo code.

Tissue w T Σ w T Bone marrow, Breast, Colon, Lung, Stomach 0.12 0.60 Bladder, Oesophagus, Gonads, Liver, Thyroid 0.05 0.25 Bone surface, Brain,Kidneys, Salivary glands, Skin 0.01 0.05 Remainder tissues* 0.10 0.10 *Remainder Tissues (14 in total) Adipose tissue, Adrenals, Connective tissue, Extrathorarcic Airways Gallbladder, Heart wall, Lymphatic nodes, Muscle, Pancreas, Prostate SI wall, Spleen, Thymus, and Uterus/Cervix *********************************************************************** Tissue w T Σ w T Gonads 0.20 0.20 RBM, Colon, Lung, Stomach 0.12 0.48 ICRP Bladder, Breast, Liver, Oesophagus, Thyroid 0.05 0.25 60 Skin, Bone surface 0.01 0.02 Remainder tissues* 0.05 0.05 *Remainder Tissues (10 in total) Adrenals, Brain, trachea, small intestine, muscle, Pancreas, Kidneys, spleen, thymus, uterus ICRP draft

Ratio of effective doses 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 EXTERNAL EXPOSURE TO PHOTONS MAX-FAXdraft / ADEV-ICRP74 MAX-FAX60 / ADEV-ICRP74 0.4 30 kev 0.01 0.1 1 10 Photon Energy (MeV) AP-draft PA-draft ROT-draft AP-60 PA-60 ROT-60 Replacement of the ADAM/EVA exposure model by the MAX/FAX exposure model for ICRP60 and ICRPdraft tissue weighting factors

2.4 2.2 EXTERNAL EXPOSURE TO ELECTRONS Ratio of effective doses 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 MAX-FAXdraft / ADEV-ICRP74 MAX-FAX60 / ADEV-ICRP74 0.4 0.1 1 10 Electron Energy (MeV) AP-draft PA-draft ROT-draft PA-60 AP-60 ROT-60 Replacement of the ADAM/EVA exposure model by the MAX/FAX exposure model for ICRP60 and ICRPdraft tissue weighting factors

2 1.8 INTERNAL EXPOSURE TO PHOTONS Ratio of effective doses 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 MAX-FAXdraft / ADEV-ICRP74 MAX-FAX60 / ADEV-ICRP74 0.01 0.1 1 10 Photon Energy (MeV) LIV-draft LUN-draft KID-draft LIV-60 LUN-60 KID-60 Replacemnt of the ADAM/EVA exposure model by the MAX/FAX exposure model for ICRP60 and ICRPdraft tissue weighting factors

1.4 INTERNAL EXPOSURE TO ELECTRONS Ratio of effective doses 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 1 10 Electron Energy (MeV) KID-draft KID-60 MAX-FAXdraft / ADEV-ICRP74 MAX-FAX60 / ADEV-ICRP74 SKEL-draft SKEL-60 Replacemant of the ADAM/EVA exposure model by the MAX/FAX exposure model for ICRP60 and ICRPdraft tissue weighting factors

Conclusions As was shown earlier, for the ICRP60 definition the effective dose would change between +60% and 50% because of the replacement of the ADAM-EVA exposure model by the MAX-FAX exposure model. If the new ICRPdraft definition is used changes of the effective dose between +140% and 50% can occur. This margin does not include additional changes from replacing a Monte Carlo code.

MAX FAX

Relative number of photons 8.0E-02 7.0E-02 6.0E-02 5.0E-02 4.0E-02 3.0E-02 2.0E-02 1.0E-02 CHEST AP 100 kvcp 2.5 mm Al 17 Deg Tungsten UNSCATTERED SPECTRA BEHIND PHANTOM 0.0E+00 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Photon energy (kev) ADAM EVA MAX FAX INCIDENT SPECTRUM

Relative number of photons 3.5E-02 3.0E-02 2.5E-02 2.0E-02 1.5E-02 1.0E-02 5.0E-03 CHEST AP 100 kvcp 2.5 mm Al 17 Deg Tungsten SCATTERED SPECTRA BEHIND PHANTOM 0.0E+00 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Photon energy (kev) ADAM EVA MAX FAX