HYPERACTIVITY IN THE HAMSTER DORSAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS: ITS RELATIONSHIP TO TINNITUS

Similar documents
What is tinnitus and how can we best manage it?

Lauer et al Olivocochlear efferents. Amanda M. Lauer, Ph.D. Dept. of Otolaryngology-HNS

Comparison of behavioral and auditory brainstem response measures of threshold shift in rats exposed to loud sound

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

Subjective Hearing Problems in Normal-Hearing Tinnitus Subjects. Background

PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL AUDITORY ASSESSMENT

Auditory nerve. Amanda M. Lauer, Ph.D. Dept. of Otolaryngology-HNS

Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear. Week 1. Laboratory session: Measuring thresholds

Acoustics, signals & systems for audiology. Psychoacoustics of hearing impairment

Synaptopathy Research Uwe Andreas Hermann

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

DIFFERENTIAL PATHOLOGIES RESULTING FROM SOUND EXPOSURE: TINNITUS VS HEARING LOSS

Psychoacoustical Models WS 2016/17

Brad May, PhD Johns Hopkins University

How is the stimulus represented in the nervous system?

Frequency refers to how often something happens. Period refers to the time it takes something to happen.

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, Volume 27, , June tleseareh Note RELATION BETWEEN REACTION TIME AND LOUDNESS

Development of Hyperactivity after Hearing Loss in a Computational Model of the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Depends on Neuron Response Type

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

C ritical Review: Do we see auditory system acclimatization with hearing instrument use, using electrophysiological measures?

THE ROLE OF PHARMACEUTICAL AGENTS IN HEARING LOSS MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION

The mammalian cochlea possesses two classes of afferent neurons and two classes of efferent neurons.

SUBJECT: Physics TEACHER: Mr. S. Campbell DATE: 15/1/2017 GRADE: DURATION: 1 wk GENERAL TOPIC: The Physics Of Hearing

Behavioral generalization

Acoustics Research Institute

Persistent Hair Cell Malfunction Contributes to Hidden Hearing Loss. The Auditory Laboratory, School of Human Sciences, The University of Western

Hidden Hearing Loss? Effects of Recreational Noise on Evoked Potential Amplitude and Other Auditory Test Metrics

Emissions are low-intensity sounds that may be detected in the external ear canal by a microphone

The Hearwig as hearing protector for musicians a practical investigation

Spectro-temporal response fields in the inferior colliculus of awake monkey

Effects of Remaining Hair Cells on Cochlear Implant Function

Hearing Evaluation: Diagnostic Approach

Issues faced by people with a Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Chapter 11: Sound, The Auditory System, and Pitch Perception

Topic 4. Pitch & Frequency. (Some slides are adapted from Zhiyao Duan s course slides on Computer Audition and Its Applications in Music)

Auditory fmri correlates of loudness perception for monaural and diotic stimulation

Wheeler, K.S. M.Cl.Sc. (Aud) Candidate School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, U.W.O

Audiogram+: GN Resound proprietary fitting rule

Required Slide. Session Objectives

2) What is the most robust distortion product evoked with DPOAEs? A. F1 B. F2 C. 2F1-F2 D. 2F2 F1

Lecturer: Rob van der Willigen 11/9/08

Protocol for Fast, Efficient Audiogram Prediction using Electrophysiology. Sponsored By

Supplementary Figure 1. Identification of the type II spiral ganglion neurons (SGN) via immunofluorescence of peripherin protein (PRPH).

Hearing. Figure 1. The human ear (from Kessel and Kardon, 1979)

2/25/2013. Context Effect on Suprasegmental Cues. Supresegmental Cues. Pitch Contour Identification (PCI) Context Effect with Cochlear Implants

Thresholds for different mammals

Lecturer: Rob van der Willigen 11/9/08

The following describes general use of ELIOS device

Nature Biotechnology: doi: /nbt Supplementary Figure 1. Analysis of hair bundle morphology in Ush1c c.216g>a mice at P18 by SEM.

WIDEXPRESS. no.30. Background

RESEARCH ON SPOKEN LANGUAGE PROCESSING Progress Report No. 22 (1998) Indiana University

Topic 4. Pitch & Frequency

Audiology (Clinical Applications)

Spectrograms (revisited)

Development of Tinnitus-Related Neuronal Hyperactivity through Homeostatic Plasticity after Hearing Loss: A Computational Model

Behavioral and Neural Discrimination of Speech Sounds After Moderate or Intense Noise Exposure in Rats

Cochlear Implant The only hope for severely Deaf

A Review of the Effectiveness of Otoacoustic Emissions for Evaluating Hearing Status After Newborn Screening

Effects of Remaining Hair Cells on Cochlear Implant Function

Neurophysiological effects of simulated auditory prosthesis stimulation

HCS 7367 Speech Perception

Otoacoustic Emissions As A Test Of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin PhD

Audiogram. Assistant Professor King Saud University Otolaryngology Consultant Otologist, Neurotologist & Skull Base Surgeon King Abdulaziz Hospital

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

Representation of sound in the auditory nerve

ABR assesses the integrity of the peripheral auditory system and auditory brainstem pathway.

FALSE POSITIVE DP GRAMS

Computational Perception /785. Auditory Scene Analysis

Noise Exposure to Young Ears: When Things Go From Bad To Worse

Healthy Organ of Corti. Loss of OHCs. How to use and interpret the TEN(HL) test for diagnosis of Dead Regions in the cochlea

Reflex Measurements - Quick Guide

Hearing Lectures. Acoustics of Speech and Hearing. Subjective/Objective (recap) Loudness Overview. Sinusoids through ear. Facts about Loudness

Supporting Information

Effect of intensity increment on P300 amplitude

1- Cochlear Impedance Telemetry

Theme 2: Cellular mechanisms in the Cochlear Nucleus

Sound localization psychophysics

Temporal offset judgments for concurrent vowels by young, middle-aged, and older adults

Effects of Remaining Hair Cells on Cochlear Implant Function

21/01/2013. Binaural Phenomena. Aim. To understand binaural hearing Objectives. Understand the cues used to determine the location of a sound source

Testing Digital Hearing Aids

Updates to NHSP guidance for post-screening diagnostic testing Update 1: August 2015 Author: BSA Electrophysiology Special Interest Group (BSA EP SIG)

~~355. J. Physiol. (I957) I37, ( Ophthalmological Research Unit, Institute of Ophthalmology,

AccuQuest Spotlight: Successful Fittings with Oasis. Fitting Range

Systems Neuroscience Oct. 16, Auditory system. http:

MASKING OF AUDITORY RESPONSES IN THE MEDULLA OBLONGATA OF GOLDFISH

Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear. Week 5. The peripheral auditory system: The ear as a signal processor

Hearing in Noise Test in Subjects With Conductive Hearing Loss

PHYS 1240 Sound and Music Professor John Price. Cell Phones off Laptops closed Clickers on Transporter energized

Hyperacusis Alliance

CROSSMODAL PLASTICITY IN SPECIFIC AUDITORY CORTICES UNDERLIES VISUAL COMPENSATIONS IN THE DEAF "

When hearing is painful. Can we damage our ears?

Stimulus any aspect of or change in the environment to which an organism responds. Sensation what occurs when a stimulus activates a receptor

Hearing. Juan P Bello

Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans a)

Eighth Quarterly Progress Report N01-DC The Neurophysiological Effects of Simulated Auditory Prosthesis Stimulation

Deafness and hearing impairment

Auditory Weighting Functions and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Sound in Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in the Same Ear

Lecture Outline. The GIN test and some clinical applications. Introduction. Temporal processing. Gap detection. Temporal resolution and discrimination

Transcription:

HYPERACTIVITY IN THE HAMSTER DORSAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS: ITS RELATIONSHIP TO TINNITUS *Jinsheng Zhang1, Henry E. Heffner2, Gim Koay2 and James A. Kaltenbach1 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine 2Department of Psychology, University of Toledo Presented at the Twenty Seventh Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2004.

Note added November 4, 2006 This study was conducted to determine the relationship between tinnitus, spontaneous activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), and hearing loss. An analysis of the data indicated that the increase in spontaneous activity in the DCN following exposure to loud sound was correlated, not with DCN activity, but with hearing loss. However, a post hoc analysis performed by two of the authors (JZ and JK), in which animals were selectively removed from the analysis, came to the opposite conclusion. It is the opinion of the other authors (HH and GK) that such a post hoc analysis is not appropriate; if one is not satisfied with the outcome of an experiment, one should reassess the procedures and perform a replication. In the meantime, we are making these results available so that others may reach their own conclusions. This poster is presented as it was at ARO 2004, with the exception of notes that have been added to slides 4, 17-19, & 22.

INTRODUCTION Evidence continues to grow for the notion that noise-induced hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) represents an important neural component of sound-induced tinnitus (Brozoski et al., 2002; Kaltenbach et al., 2004). The aim of the current study was to examine the influence of hearing loss on the relationship between the level of spontaneous activity in the DCN and the strength of tinnitus using animals that had been tested behaviorally for tinnitus.

METHODS Animal subjects: Twenty-eight adult Syrian golden hamsters. [N.B. Statistical analyses were based on 25 animals as complete physiological recordings were not available for three of the animals.] Behavioral training: Animals were behaviorally trained to respond a sound using a two-choice sound localization paradigm. Each animal was trained to lick a waterspout, when a sound was presented either from left or right loudspeaker (Fig. 1). Correct responses were rewarded with water whereas incorrect responses were followed by a mild shock. Silent trials were inserted in which no sound was presented. After 42-47 training sessions, the animals were able to perform with 95% correct or better on the left-right discrimination for at least a week, which had 5 sessions of test trials during which no sound was presented. Tone exposure and control treatment: The left ears of three groups of animals were exposed under anesthesia to a 10 khz at 80, 110 or 125 db SPL. The exposure duration was 4 hours. Animals in control group were only anesthetized, and not exposed to any sound.

METHODS (cont.) Behavioral testing: Behavioral testing was performed during silence one day after sound exposure/control treatment. Measurement of ABR thresholds: Hearing loss was evaluated by measuring the ABR thresholds to a band-pass noise burst: 7.5-50 khz; 1 ms in duration; pulsed 27.7 times per second. Electrophysiological recording: Twelve to twenty days after sound exposure/control treatment and behavioral and ABR testing, spontaneous multiunit activity was recorded on the DCN surface (Fig. 2). In each animal, we recorded from 3 rows of 13-15 sites for a total of 39-45 sites. At each site, counts of spontaneous events were performed over an interval of 90 sec.

Data analysis: 1) The behavioral performances were compared between the last preexposure/control treatment sessions and the first 4 post-exposure/control treatment sessions. High scores for animals going to the left indicated that they acquired tinnitus in the left, whereas low scores indicated these animals did not develop tinnitus. 2) The lateral most recording point of each row was used as a reference point for topographical localization of all the recording sites. Spontaneous rates for each animal were obtained by averaging the data recorded from 3 rows of recording sites along their rostrocaudal axes of the DCN. The data were further averaged across animals to yield average spontaneous rates for each group. 3) Linear regression and correlation (0 order and partial) analyses were performed to determine relationships among spontaneous rate, the strength of behavioral evidence for tinnitus and the degree of hearing loss as reflected by the level of ABR thresholds.

Fig. 1 Behavioral setup Setup for behavioral training and testing for tinnitus using the two-choice sound localization paradigm. Each animal was trained to lick a waterspout, when a sound was presented either from left or right loudspeaker

Fig. 2 Recording setup............................................. Dorsal view of the surgically exposed left DCN. Dots represent 3 rows of recording sites along the mediolateral axis of the DCN.

RESULTS Intense sound exposure caused corresponding changes in the level of spontaneous activity in the DCN, the probability that an animal tested positive for tinnitus, and the degree of ABR threshold shift. All three quantities increased in magnitude with increases in exposure level. (Fig. 3). Correlation analyses revealed that the level of spontaneous activity in the DCN was significantly related to both behavioral evidence for tinnitus and the degree of hearing loss. The relationship between activity and hearing loss was slightly stronger than that between activity and tinnitus when the data were analyzed as a single sample (Fig. 4 and Table 1). However, closer inspection of the data in Fig. 4A and B suggests that the point distribution falls into two segments as shown in Fig. 5A and B; this 2-segment pattern is similar to that found in a previous study examining the relationship between the level of activity in the DCN and the degree and type of hair cell loss (Fig. 5D). Correlational analysis of the major segment (segment A) suggests that the level of activity is more strongly correlated with the behavioral evidence for tinnitus than with the degree of hearing loss (JZ and JK, Fig. 5A and B, Table 1).

Fig. 3A Activity, behavioral scores and ABR thresholds Spontaneous rates (events/sec) A 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Control (n=7) 80 db (n=6) 110 db (n=5) 125 db (n=7) 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Distance from the lateral most recording point (mm) A. Spontaneous rates (Mean + S.E.M.) recorded from control animals and animals exposed to a 10 khz tone at 80, 110 or 125 db SPL. Note that spontaneous rates increased broadly as exposure intensity was increased.

Fig. 3B Activity, behavioral scores and ABR thresholds B 100 80 60 40 20 0 Activity (events/sec) Scores (% correct) H.L. (db atten.) Control (n=2,7*) 80 db SPL (n=6) 110 db SPL (n=5) 125 db SPL (n=7) B. A three-dimensional plot shows trends towards higher spontaneous rates, behavioral scores for tinnitus and ABR thresholds with increasing exposure levels. Average spontaneous rates obtained at locus of 0.8 mm from the lateral most recording point of the DCN is used as a representative profile of changes in spontaneous rates.

RESULTS Intense sound exposure caused corresponding changes in the level of spontaneous activity in the DCN, the probability that an animal tested positive for tinnitus, and the degree of ABR threshold shift. All three quantities increased in magnitude with increases in exposure level. (Fig. 3). Correlation analyses revealed that the level of spontaneous activity in the DCN was significantly related to both behavioral evidence for tinnitus and the degree of hearing loss. The relationship between activity and hearing loss was slightly stronger than that between activity and tinnitus when the data were analyzed as a single sample (Fig. 4 and Table 1). However, closer inspection of the data in Fig. 4A and B suggests that the point distribution falls into two segments as shown in Fig. 5A and B; this 2- segment pattern is similar to that found in a previous study examining the relationship between the level of activity in the DCN and the degree and type of hair cell loss (Fig. 5D). Correlational analysis of the major segment (segment A) suggests that the level of activity is more strongly correlated with the behavioral evidence for tinnitus than with the degree of hearing loss (JZ and JK, Fig. 5A and B, Table 1).

Fig. 4A Correlation analysis Spontaneous rate (events/sec) A 150 100 50 Segment A+B r = 0.61 p = 0.0012 Activity vs Score (0.8 mm) 0-0.25-0.05 0.15 0.35 0.55 0.75 Behavioral scores for tinnitus (percent) Relationship between DCN activity and behavioral evidence for tinnitus when the entire set of data is analyzed as a whole. Spontaneous rates for each animal were obtained from a recording site at the 0.8 mm locus.

Fig. 4B Correlation analysis Spontaneous rate (events/sec) B 150 100 50 Activity vs Hearing loss (0.8 mm) Segment A+B r = 0.67 p = 0.0003 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Hearing loss (db attentuation) Relationship between DCN activity and hearing loss when the entire data is analyzed as a whole. Spontaneous rates for each animal were obtained from a recording site at the 0.8 mm locus.

Fig. 4C Correlation analysis Behavioral scores for tinnitus (%) C 0.75 0.55 0.35 0.15-0.05-0.25 r = 0.71 p < 0.0001 Hearing loss vs Score Segment A+B 0 10 20 30 40 50 Hearing loss (db attentuation) Relationship between behavioral evidence for tinnitus and hearing loss when the entire set of data is analyzed as a whole.

Table for Fig. 4 Correlation analysis Correlations: Entire data set Data in segment A 0 order r p r p 1. Activity x Score 0.61 <0.001 0.71 <0.0001 2. Activity x Hearing Loss 0.67 <0.001 0.56 <0.05 3. Score x Hearing Loss 0.71 <0.0001 0.59 <0.001 Partial r p p p r p p p 1. Activity x Score 0.26 N.S. 0.57 <0.05 Remove Hearing Loss 2. Activity x Hearing Loss 0.42 <0.05 0.25 N.S. Remove Score 3. Score x Hearing Loss 0.51 <0.05 0.33 N.S. Remove Activity Correlation analyses (0 order and partial) among the level of spontaneous activity, behavioral evidence for tinnitus and the degree of hearing loss.

Fig. 5A A two-segment theory A Activity vs Score (0.8 mm) 150 Segment A Segment B Spontaneous rate (events/sec) 100 50 r = 0.76 p = 0.0001 r = 0.79 p = 0.21 N.B. Segment A is made by dropping the four animals with the highest tinnitus scores. 0-0.25-0.05 0.15 0.35 0.55 0.75 Behavioral scores for tinnitus (percent) Relationship between DCN activity and behavioral evidence for tinnitus. Spontaneous rates for each animal were obtained from a recording site at the 0.8 mm locus. The point distribution is suggestive of a 2-segment function.

Fig. 5B A two-segment theory B Activity vs Hearing loss (0.8 mm) Spontaneous rate (events/sec) 150 100 50 Segment A r = 0.56 p = 0.02 Segment B r = 0.71 p = 0.08 N.B. Unlike the previous graph, segment A is made here by dropping the seven animals with the greatest hearing loss. One of the animals dropped from segment A in Fig. 5A is now back in. 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Hearing loss (db attentuation) Relationship between DCN activity and the degree of hearing loss. Spontaneous rates for each animal were obtained at the 0.8 mm locus. The point distribution is suggestive of a 2-segment function.

Fig. 5C A two-segment theory Behavioral scores for tinnitus (%) C 0.75 0.55 0.35 0.15-0.05 r = 0.71 p = 0.0001 Hearing loss vs Score Segment A+B N.B. This analysis drops the same seven animals from segment A as Fig. 5B. -0.25 0 10 20 30 40 50 Hearing loss (db attentuation) Relationship between the strength of tinnitus and the degree of hearing loss. Each point indicates the behavioral score for a single animal whose hearing loss, measured as the magnitude of the ABR threshold shift, is indicated on the abscissa.

Fig. 5D A two-segment theory Relationship between spontaneous rate and hair cells loss as a result of cisplatin treatment. Spontaneous rate changes manifested with an offset as loss of IHCs was involved (adapted from Kaltenbach et al., 2002 )

SUMMARY The results are in line with our previous findings (Kaltenbach et al., 2004) by showing that the strength of evidence for tinnitus correlated with the degree of hyperactivity in the DCN. The results of the correlational analysis are as yet unclear regarding the cause and effect relationship between hyperactivity and tinnitus. The partial correlation results for the data taken as a whole suggest that the relationship between DCN activity and tinnitus may be dependent on the presence of hearing loss. Removal of the effects of hearing loss reduces the significance of the relationship between DCN activity and tinnitus. This could be interpreted to mean either that hyperactivity and tinnitus are independent effects of hearing loss, or that hearing loss may lead to tinnitus indirectly by causing hyperactivity as well as directly by removing the masking effects of external sound on the perception of tinnitus.

SUMMARY (cont.) An alternative view, based on the two-segment model of Fig. 5, is that hyperactivity and tinnitus have a significant cause and effect relationship independent of hearing loss, over most of the hearing loss range, but that with severe hearing loss, the level of activity in the DCN becomes less important than the degree of hearing loss in determining the occurrence of tinnitus (JZ and JK). This two-segment hypothesis also offers to explain why some cases of tinnitus are not associated with hearing loss and why hearing loss is not always accompanied by tinnitus (JZ and JK). N.B. An issue not addressed here is the discrepancy in the time course of the increased spontaneous activity in the DCN, which does not occur until days after exposure to loud sound, whereas the onset of the resulting tinnitus is instantaneous. For a discussion of this and other issues, see Heffner, H. E. and Koay, G. (2005). Tinnitus and hearing loss in hamsters exposed to loud sound. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 734-742.

Acknowledgement This work was supported by the Tinnitus Research Consortium and NIDCD grant R01 DC03258.