J. Bio.Env. Sci. 2018

Similar documents
Study some biological aspects of peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae) In laboratory and field

Population Dynamics of Three Species of Genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in BARI, Chakwal (Punjab)

Comparative Toxicity of Certain Pesticides to Peach Fruit Fly, Bactrocera zonata Saunders (Diptera: Tephritidae) under Laboratory Conditions

Color preferences of fruit flies to methyl eugenol traps, population trend and dominance of fruit fly species in citrus orchards of Sargodha, Pakistan

Mathematics and Statistics Journal

Fruit Fly Surveillance in Nepal

Ecology and Sustainable Management of Major Bactrocera Fruit Flies in Goa, India

The Hawaii Fruit Fly Area-Wide Pest Management Program: Accomplishments and Future Directions

Bactrocera dorsalis : Current status JH VENTER NPPOZA MAY 2017

Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 14, No. 1, January 2019

Relationship between Population Fluctuation of Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel and Abiotic Factors in Yezin, Myanmar

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTION OF PEACH FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA ZONATA (SAUND.)(DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)

The geographical distributions of Mediterranean. (Diptera:Tephritidae) and its management in Iraq.

The Threat of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly1 to American Agriculture and Efforts Being Made to Counter This Threat2 3

Population Density and Percentage of Infestation with Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) in Two Iraqi Provinces

INFLUENCE OF WEATHER PARAMETERS ON FRUIT FLY TRAP CATCHES INDHARWAD, KARNATAKA

The Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Central America

Population dynamics of fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species associated with mango in the Guinea Savanna Agro-Ecological zone of Ghana

Full-text Available Online at

DETERMINATION OF FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) INFESTATION IN GUAVA, PEACH AND BITTER GOURD ORCHARDS IN KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA.

Efficacy of different lures in male annihilation technique of peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Efficacy of Protein Bait Sprays in Controlling Melon Fruit Fly [Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)] in Vegetable Agro-ecosystems

Curre nt Status of the Solanaceous Fruit Fly Control Project in Yonaguni Island. Abstract

Area-wide integrated pest management of tephritid fruit flies using the sterile insect technique

NAPPO Regional Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (RSPM)

PT 18: Cold treatment for Bactrocera tryoni on Citrus limon

Archive of SID. Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fruit fly management practices on tropical fruit in Africa

Seasonal monitoring of fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) and its parasitoids Trybliographa daci on guava fruit from Sindh Pakistan

Evaluation of modified waste brewer s yeast as a protein source for the control of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)

ABUNDANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF FRUIT FLIES ON PEACH THROUGH MALE ANNIHILATION TECHNIQUE (MAT) USING METHYL EUGENOL BASED MINERAL WATER BOTTLE TRAPS

Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Genetic Sexing: All-male Sterile Fly Releases in Hawaii

LOW ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SOME FRUIT FLIES IN EGYPT

PT 7: Irradiation treatment for fruit flies of the family Tephritidae (generic)

[fll ~ft:

PHYTOSANITARY IRRADIATION TO CONTROL QUARANTINE PESTS

Detection of Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): Performance of Trimedlure Relative to Capilure and Enriched Ginger Root Oil

Radiation doses for sterilization of tephritid fruit flies

PT 17: Cold treatment for Bactrocera tryoni on Citrus reticulata x C. sinensis

Rearing Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

PT 4: Irradiation treatment for Bactrocera jarvisi

Name change of the invasive fruit fly and update on its pest status in South Africa

Genetic Control Tactic Against Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Insect to Escape Destruction of Perishable Horticulture Crops

NAPPO Regional Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (RSPM)

Brian N. Barnes 1 & Jan-Hendrik Venter 2

The IPM based on mass trapping : Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae)?

ISPM No. 26 ESTABLISHMENT OF PEST FREE AREAS FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) (2006)

The fruit flies are the classical international

Ceratitis capitata Wiedmann (Diptera: Tephritidae)

[Attachment] Survey guidelines for major fruit flies

AN ATTEMPT AT THE ERADICATION OF THE ORIENTAL FRUIT FLY, Bactrocera dorsalis (HENDEL) FROM MAURITIUS

PT 31: Vapour heat treatment for Bactrocera tryoni on Mangifera indica

Guava Fruit Fly, Bactrocera correcta (Bezzi) (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae) 1

PT 10: Irradiation treatment for Grapholita molesta

Successful Utilization of the Area-Wide Approach for the Management of Fruit Flies in Hawaii

Tel: ; Fax: URL: Cohen, E., Ph.D. (Head of Department) Shafir, S., Ph.D.

ASSESSMENT OF FRUIT FLY BACTROCERA INVADENS (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) PRESENCE IN EASTERN PROVINCE OF RWANDA. M.Olivier & 2 Hance Thierry,

PILOT APPLICATION OF STERILE INSECT TECHNIQUE FOR THE ORIENTAL FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA PHJLIPPJNENSIS, IN NAOWAY ISLET

Todd E. Shelly, Jon Nishimoto, and Rick Kurashima USDA-APHIS, Ahiki Street, Waimanalo, HI 96795;

FRUIT FLY OF CUCURBITS IN SEMI ARID REGION OF NORTH GUJARAT CHAUDHARY, F. K. *

Comparison of local fruit flies attractant with imported attractants (Methyl Eugenol & Cue Lure) in guava, peach

Diversity and abundance of Dacinae fruit flies (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae) in Chini 2, Runchang and Sungai Bebar, Pahang, Peninsular Malaysia

PT 21: Vapour heat treatment for Bactrocera melanotus and Bactrocera xanthodes on Carica papaya

Institute/Country. Universidad de Costa Rica, COSTA RICA. Plant Protection Directorate, Madeira, PORTUGAL

Making codling moth mating disruption work in Michigan: Adopting an area-wide approach to managing codling moth in Michigan apple production

ONGOING PROJECT REPORT YEAR 1/3 WTFRC Project # CH

Evaluation of certain olfactory compounds and natural oils as attractants or repellents for fruit flies in Egypt

ISPM No. 30 ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) (2008)

Full Length Research Paper. Mbaye Ndiaye 1 * and Fabrice L. R. Lesueur 2

Additions to the Fruit Fly Fauna (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) of Bangladesh, with a Key to the Species

Capture of Bactrocera Males (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Parapheromone-Baited Traps: A Comparison of Liquid versus Solid Formulations

SEASONAL VARIATIONS OF MELON FLY, Bactrocera cucurbitae (COQUILLETT) (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) IN DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL HABITATS OF BANGLADESH

Carpomyia vesuviana Costa (Diptera, Tephritidae)

ISPM 26. Establishment of pest free areas for fruit flies (Tephritidae)

Mediterranean fruit fly

Fruit Sampling Guidelines for Area-Wide Fruit Fly Programmes

DOI: /BER SHORT COMMUNICATION

Irradiation Quarantine Treatments for Deciduous Tree Fruits

Fruit fly Programmes in Latin America Pedro Rendón/Walther Enkerlin

All male strains and chemical stimulants: Two ways to boost sterile males in SIT programs. Abstract

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

Review of Long-Term Containment Strategy for Exotic Fruit Flies in Torres Strait. Andrew Tomkins Chair

Use of Attractants to Suppress Oriental Fruit Fly and Cryptophlebia spp. in Litchi

Fruits are grown on 0.64 million hectares in

ATTACHMENT 5 CONSISTENCY CORRECTIONS IN RELATION TO HARMONIZATION OF FRUIT FLY STANDARDS

Phytosanitary Irradiation: Technology and Efficacy

Establishment of areas of low pest prevalence for fruit flies (Tephritidae)

Development of female medfly attractant systems for trapping and sterility assessment

International Journal of Insect Science 2013:5

FRUIT FLY LURE AND TRAP FOR QUEENSLAND FRUIT FLY (Bactrocera tryoni) TECHNICAL MANUAL Innovation. Quality. Solutions.

Volume 1 Issue 2 April-June,2012 DOSE OF CUE- LURE FOR SUPPRESSION OF MELON FLY POPULATION IN PUMPKIN CHAUDHARY*, F. K. AND PATEL, G. M.

Queensland fruit fly responses (2014)

Effect of citrus peel substances on male Mediterranean fruit fly behaviour

Pheromone Based Mating Disruption

Improved attractants for the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae

EFFICACY OF PROTEIN BAIT SPRAYS IN CONTROLLING FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) INFESTING ANGLED LUFFA AND BITTER GOURD IN THAILAND

Grant T. McQuate 1, Aimé H. Bokonon-Ganta 2, and Eric B. Jang 1

Demographic parameters and biotic factors of two Dacini species, Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus, on Réunion Island

Improved postharvest market access treatments for horticultural commodities (3097)

A New Eye Mutant, apricot, of the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis

Transcription:

Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES) ISSN: 2220-6663 (Print) 2222-3045 (Online) Vol. 12, No. 6, p. 96-101, 2018 http://www.innspub.net RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS Effect of type trap, height and color in attracting and capture of peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata A.H. Abu-Ragheef 1*, R.F. Al-Jassany 2 1 Department of Plant Protection,College of Agriculture, Misan University, Iraq 2 Department of Plant Protection,College of Agriculture, Baghdad University, Iraq Article published on June 21, 2018 Key words: Iraq, Population density, Phermonal traps, Trap desigen,bactrocera. Abstract The aim of the study is to find the best types, heights and colors of traps used in attracting and catching Bactrocera zonata The study was conducted in orchard in AL-Jadriya / Baghdad during season of 2017,used four different types of traps were used, three different heights and four colors of the Jackson traps with sexual pheromone Methyl eugenol in attracting and capture the males of peach fruit fly B. zonata. The results were showed that local trap was the best and caught 110 insects; while the Jackson trap catch 106, Tephritrap was 61 and the red wasp modified trap 16 during the study period. Height results (1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 m) showed no significant effect on attract of B. zonata males. Traps colors had significant effect on attracting and catching males of B.zonata. Yellow traps was the best which catched 880 males during study period,while white,green and red traps catched 826, 707 and 541 males respectively.based on the results of this study, the Jackson and local trap in yellow color and white when put it on 2 m with sexual pheromone was an affective method to predict B. zonata and estimate its population. * Corresponding Author: A. H. Abu-Ragheef alimsc1973@gmail.com 96 Abu-Ragheef and Al-Jassany

Introduction Peach fruit fly (PFF) Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) family Tephretidae, Thisgenus includes about 440 species, which causing significant losses to many fruits of tropical and subtropical trees. Most species are found in the tropics, South Pacific and Australia (White and Elson-Harris, 1994). The damages that caused by PFF was reached 100% of fruit without control (Hardy, 1997). In addition quarantine preventing these fruits from entering to many countries which are importing these fruits (Joomaye and Price, 2000). The Peach fruit fly was a polyphagy pest which infect more than 40 vegetable and fruit crops such as guava, mango, peach, papaya and citrus fruits (Alzubaidy, 2000; Stonehouse et al. 2002). Losses caused by the insect are estimated about320 million $ in the middle East and about 190 million $ in Egypt annually (FAO/IAEA, 2000). One of the most important methods used to manage pests, particularly fruit flies, are to monitor, predict and estimate the population density of pest by sexual pheromone traps. These method are including monitoring vacillate of peach fruit fly in horticulture through male trapping by specialized pheromone is considered the mainmethod of predicting and managing the pest (Draz et al. 2016). The use of pheromone traps is very effective for reducing the population density of the peach fruit fly, and the eastern fruit fly in mango and guava fields of India (Divender and Raniect, 2000), The use of white and yellow pheromone traps at zero height is effective to reducing the population density of the peach fruit fly. The first record of this insect in Iraq in 1972 from fruit samples imported from Bahrain (El-Haidari et al. 1972), then confirmed as peach fruit fly Dacus zonatus it has been infect fruits of peachs and mango, watermelon and Alfalfa.Then insect disappeared from the Iraqi environment (Al-Ali,1977). After that fruit fly B.zonata was recorded in orchard fruit fly of Alhafrya city in Was it province and caused severe damage to citrus fruites (Abdulrazak et al. 2016). Because the wide spread for B.zonata this study was conducted to investigate the effects of pheromone trap design, color and height on attractting and capture males of B.zonata and the possibility of using pheromone trap for population monitoring in IPM program for this pest. Materials and methods Effect of the trap type This study was conducted in the Al-Jadriya region at a fruit orchard of 60 acres planted with citrus, figs, pomegranates and olives trees during the period 15/5/2017 to 1/8/2017. The red wasp, Tephri, red Jackson trap and local traps. Which designed by the researchers. The local trap consist of a plastic bottles (10 30) cm with a hole in the top, and 8 mm diameter holes in three reciprocating lines with four holes per line. Specialized traps lured with Methyl eugenol (British IPM Company) used in all traps to attract males and Dichlorovus pesticide used in the first three types of traps which used as a killing agent inside the traps, while sticky strips used in Jackson trap.were recorded every at weekly Data and lures replaced every 15 days Three traps placed for each mandarin trees (trap/tree), the distance between trees was 25 m. The traps set randomly in different replicates, Traps checked weekly, and the number of males caught was record weekly. Effect of trap height To evaluate the effectivners of traps height Nine red Jackson lured with (Methyl eugenol) in the same orchard, Traps were placed at three high (1.5, 2.0 and 2.5) m, and the distance between traps were 25m. Three trees and three replicates used for representing the height. These trees distributed randomly. Checked weekly, and the number of males caught in the traps recorded and lures replaced every 15 day. Effect of trap colour Twelve Jackson traps used to determine the effect of color difference on the efficiency of the trap. White, red, yellow and green colors with wavelengths (250-700, 700-750, 600-650, 500-550 nm) respectively 97 Abu-Ragheef and Al-Jassany

.Three traps for each color used for this study which placed on mandrine trees at 1.8-2m height and the distance of 25m between trees. The results recorded every week, and the lures changed every 15 days. The experiments during 15/09/2017 to 28/11/2017. Used the Random Complete Block Design (RCBD),Data were submitted for analysis of variance (ANOVA) The means compared by LSD by 0.05%(Sahuki and Wahib,1990), results analysed by SAS softwa 2010. Results and discussion The effect of the trap type in attracting and catching B.zonata males Results in Table 1 indicated the presence of a significant differences between the numbers of B.zonata males caught in different traps.local trap caught the highest numbers of 110 males from B.zonata during the study period of 10 weeks at 11 males/ trap/week, while Jackson trap had caught 106 males with average 10.6 males/ trap/week, which was not significantly different between two traps. Numbers caught in Tephri trap significantly differences from local and Jackson traps which caught 61 males with an average 6.1 male /trap /week,while the red wasp trap was recorded least the numbers of male catching 16 male with average 1.6 male/trap/week. Table 1.Number of males of B. zonata caught by different type of traps. Sampling date Total No.of malescaught weekly (Local) traps Red Jackson Tephri traps Modified red Mean trap wasp trap 22/5/2017 13 14 8 0 8.7 30/5/2017 22 24 15 2 15.7 6/6/2017 3 3 2 1 2.2 14/6/2017 15 12 8 4 9.7 22/6/2017 12 12 6 2 8 30/6/2017 14 6 6 2 7 8/7/2017 6 8 4 1 4.7 16/7/2017 6 2 5 1 3.5 24/7/2017 11 14 3 2 7.5 1/8/2017 8 11 4 1 6 Total 110 106 61 16 Mean 11 10.6 6.1 1.6 L.S.D = 2.85 to compare the numbers of male in traps. L.S.D = 4.58 to compare the numbers of male at different times. The superiority of the local and the Jackson traps by catching the highest numbers during the study may be due to the large number and size of holes in both traps that help the natural release and rapid spread of pheromones that attract the male to both traps. While Tephri trap is characterized by lack of holes that present in one side only, this is an obstacle to the spread speed of the pheromone. The lowest number of males were caught in the red wasp trap, which may be dueto the inappropriate design with the flying style of B.zonata males. In a similar study,( El-Shblawi,2012) found no significant differences between the numbers of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata, which was occurred in the local, Jackson and Tephri traps.while(bekker et al., 2016) indicate that Jackson's trap was superior compared with Tephri trap in catching of olive fly Bactrocera oleae. 98 Abu-Ragheef and Al-Jassany

Table 2.Number of peach fruit fly B.zonata males caught at different traps heights. Sampling data Numbers of males caught/trap 1.5 m 2 m 2.5 m Mean 22/5/2017 11 15 13 13 30/5/2017 10 21 15 15.3 6/6/2017 1 2 1 1.3 14/6/2017 11 23 11 11.2 22/6/2017 19 21 17 19 30/6/2017 14 20 19 17.6 8/7/2017 9 7 3 6.3 16/7/2017 3 5 7 5 24/7/2017 15 3 9 9 1/8/2017 11 11 7 9.6 Total 104 128 102 Mean 10.4 12.8 10.2 L.S.D = 3.58 to compare the numbers of catching males at different heights. L.S.D = 6.53 to compare the numbers of male at different times. Effect of trap height on the numbers of B.zonata males Results of the study showed no effect of the trap height on attracting and catching males of the peach fruit fly. The statistical analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the numbers of males caught at different heights of the traps, although there are apparent differences in the numbers of catching. Results in Table (2) indicated that superiority of the traps placed at 2 m height, were the highest number of males, reached 128 male during the study period, at an average of 12.8 males/ trap/week. Traps placed at a height of 1.5mhightwere catach 104 malesat average 10.4 males/trap/week. While the traps at a height of 2.5 m were the lowest catching of males, reached 102 male during the study period male at average10.2 male/ trap/week. Table 3. Number of Peach fruit fly, B. zonata males caught in different colours of the Jackson trap. Sampling data No. of males caught in different traps /Week Yellow traps Red traps White traps Green traps Mean 26/9/2017 44 34 51 32 40.2 3/10/2017 57 31 51 48 46.7 10/10/2017 209 110 175 142 159 16/10/2017 156 52 131 99 109.5 24/10/2017 52 51 72 78 63.2 31/10/2017 95 77 96 76 86 7/11/2017 77 54 80 62 68.2 14/11/2017 78 61 60 58 64.2 21/11/2017 50 31 47 63 47.7 28/11/2017 62 40 63 49 53.5 Total 880 541 826 707 Mean 88 54.1 82.6 70.7 L.S.D =15.65 for colours of Jackson trap. L.S.D = 24.75 For different sample time. 99 Abu-Ragheef and Al-Jassany

The absence of significant differences in numbers caught at different traps height may be due to the effect of pheromone presence and spread at all elevations. In a similar study,(draz,2016) confirmed that 2 m placing traps was the best for attracting males of peach fly. While El-Gendy(2012) indicated that the height 1.5 m is the best height to catch B.zonata males El-Shblawi( 2012) observed that the height of the placing of the traps on 1.8 m is the best. It can be concluded from the results of the study that the Jackson and local traps in yellow and white colors at the height of 2 m on trees are the most effective methods to predict the presence of this insect and estimate its population. Furthermore, pheromine traps canbe used individually or within the program of integrated management for control of this insect by attracting and catching a large number of B.zonata males. Effect of trap colour on catching B.zonata males Results in Table 3 showed that, Yellow traps were superior, and the catching the highest numbers of males of 880 during the experiment at an average 88 males/ trap/week. Followed by white traps at 826 males at a average 82.6 males/ trap/weeky. While green-colored, traps recorded 707 males during the study and at a average of 70.7 males/ trap/weeky. Red traps caught the least numbers of 541 and a average 54.1 male/ trap/week. As indicated by the above results, there is no significant difference among the traps in yellow, white and green. However, there were significant differences between the previous traps and red traps; the high attraction of yellow and white colormay be attributed to the close of the two colors with the color of the plant hosts. Also, the intensity of light reflection of the white and yellow colors, especially at the beginning of the compared to green, red and black. Prokopy et al. (2000) confirm that yellow traps are the most attractive of the white and orange traps maturity of the fruits, which is accurately, distinguishes by insect individuals. The results were agreed with the findings Stark and Vargas(1992) that white and yellow colored plastic traps with methyl eugenol caught the highest number of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata. whereas Mahdi (2000) indicates that the attraction of the fruit flies of the Dacus ciliatus to the yellow traps and then to white traps was a lesser degree. Al-Karboli (2000 ) indicates to the effectiveness of white trap and food attractant in the program of integrated control of Delia alliria Fonseca. References Abdulrazak A, Hameed A, Samir A, Naema I, Ali K, Khalid M, Saad A.2016. New record of peach fruitfly Bactrocera zonata, (Saunders) (Tephritidae:Diptera) in Iraq. Arab and Near East Plant Protaction Newsletter,Number 69, December 2016. http://www.asplantprotection.org/. Al-karboli HH. 2000. Efficacy of some integrated elements for control of Onion maccot Delia alliria Fonsece. The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural sciences 43(1),98-106. Al-AliA.1977. Phytophagous and Entomophagous Insects and Mites of Iraq. Natural history research center Publication No.33. Al Zahra Press Baghdad:142p. AlzubaidyM.2000.Economic Importance and Control/Eradication of Peach Fruit Fly, Bactrocera zonata. Arab and Near East Journal Plant Protaction. 18, 139-142. http://www.asplantprotection.org/ Bekker G, Addison P, Addison M.2016. Comparison of traps for monitoring Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera :Tephritidae ) in Commercial Olive Orchards of the Western CAPE,South Africa,3 rd International Symposium 11-14 April :2016. Divender G, Ranjeet B. 2000. Population fluctuations of fruit flies Bactrocera ssp. in 100 Abu-Ragheef and Al-Jassany

submountainous mango and guava orchards. Journal of Applied Horticulture. Lucknow 2(1),47-49. Ocean commission regional fruit fly. Fruit fly ecology in the Seychelles and Mauritius.5 th - 9 th June:3-16. Draz, K, Reda M, Mohamed A, Ismail R, Habashy F.2016. Population activity of peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephiritidae) at fruits orchards in Kafer El-Shikh Governorate, Egypt. Article Arthropods5(1),28-43. Mahdi HS. 2000. Environmental and biological Studies of Dacus ciliates (Loew) (Tephritidae: Diptera) and some methods of its control. Ph.D Thesis of, College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad, Iraq.102p. El-Gendy IR. 2012. Evaluation of attraction efficiency of Jacksontrap peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders).International Journal of Agricultural Research7(4), 223-230. El-Haidari H, Fattah Y, Sultan J.1972.Contribution to the Insect Fonna of Iraq.Part.(4). El-Shblawi LA. 2012. Evaluation of some types of traps, baits and controlling methods for Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata(wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on pomegranates.master Thesis, College of Agriculture, Baghdad University.116p. Prokopy RJ, Miller NW, Duau JJ, Vargas RI. 2000. Local enhancement of arrivals of Ceratitis capitata females on fruit mimics. EntomologiaExperimentalisetApplicata97(2),211-217. Sahuki M, WahibK. 1990. Applications in the analysis and design of experiments. Dar al-hikma for printing and publishing 488p. Stark JD, Vargas RL. 1992. Differential response of male oriental fruit fly (Diptera:Tephritidae) to colored traps baited with methyl eugenol. Journal Economic Entomology 85(3),808-812. FAO/ IAEA.2000.Action Plan : Peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata.joint FAO/ IAEA Division, Vienna. Hardy DE.1997. Taxonomy and distribution of the oriental fruit flies and related species (Tephritidae, Diptera ).Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society20, 395-428. Joomaye AN, Price NS. 2000. Quarantine pest risk analysis and quarantine of fruit flies in Indian Stonehouse M, Mahmood A, Poswal K, Mumforda N, Baloch M, ChaudharyH, Makhdum G, HuggettD. 2002. Farm field assessments of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Pakistan: distribution, damage and control. Crop Protect. 21(1),661-669. White I.M, Elson-Harris MM.1994. Fruit flies of economic significance. Their identification and bionomics. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.601p. 101 Abu-Ragheef and Al-Jassany