CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Similar documents
CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

N Engl J Med 2018;378: DOI: /NEJMoa Lin, Wan-Ting 2018/06/27

Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat or Allopurinol in Patients with Gout

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Lesinurad in Combination With a Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitor for Treatment of Hyperuricemia Associated With Gout

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

J. Michael Gaziano, M.D., M.P.H. European Society of Cardiology August 26 th 2018

Urate Lowering Efficacy of Febuxostat Versus Allopurinol in Hyperuricemic Patients with Gout

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

New Drug Evaluation: lesinurad tablet, oral

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

Disclosures (2013 to the present)

Zurampic. (lesinurad) New Product Slideshow

European Society of Cardiology Congress 2018

CPORT E Trial. Atlantic C PORT

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Initial Phase 3 Studies Results for Rilonacept in the Prevention of Gout Flares in Patients Initiating Uric Acid-lowering Therapy and the Treatment

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

LEADER Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Hypertension Update Warwick Jaffe Interventional Cardiologist Ascot Hospital

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#

Sanjay Kaul, MD, FACC, FAHA Division of Cardiology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California

New Drug Evaluation: lesinurad tablet, oral

CANVAS Program Independent commentary

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 24 June 2009

Supplementary Appendix

Dapagliflozin and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from DECLARE-TIMI 58

PRASUGREL HYDROCHLORIDE (Effient Eli Lilly Canada Inc.) Indication: Acute Coronary Syndrome

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

ALLHAT. Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic

Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016

Gout: Update in therapeutics

LATE BREAKING STUDIES IN DM AND CAD. Will this change the guidelines?

The Changing Landscape of Managing Patients with PAD- Update on the Evidence and Practice of Care in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

The earlier BP control the better cardiovascular outcome. Jin Oh Na Cardiovascular center Korea University Medical College

Expert Meeting on Large Simple Trials (LST s)

Is there enough evidence for DAPT after endovascular intervention for PAOD?

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

The University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy

Lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients with type 2

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, On the behalf of SMART-DATE trial investigators ACC LBCT 2018

Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary Disease (BEST Trial)

FDA Briefing Document. Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) December 14, 2015

No Increased Cardiovascular Risk for Lixisenatide in ELIXA

Limitations of Use: (1) Duzallo is not recommended for the treatment of asymptomatic hyperuricemia.

Faculty/Presenter Disclosure

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Cardiovascular Outcomes With Newer Diabetes Drugs: Results From The EMPA-REG and LEADER Trials

Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or

Διάρκεια διπλής αντιαιμοπεταλιακής αγωγής. Νικόλαος Γ.Πατσουράκος Καρδιολόγος, Επιμελητής Α ΕΣΥ Τζάνειο Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Πειραιά

DECISION-CTO. Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Stenting For Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion. Seung-Jung Park, MD., PhD.

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Regulatory Hurdles for Drug Approvals

Main Results Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke (IRIS) Trial

Experiences with interim trial monitoring, particularly with early stopped trials

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Cost-effectiveness of lesinurad (Zurampic ) for the treatment of adult patients with gout

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Effect of SGLT-2 Inhibitors on the Heart. Robert Zimmerman MD Vice Chairman Endocrinology Director Diabetes Center Cleveland Clinic

The ACCELERATE Trial

BLOOD PRESSURE-LOWERING TREATMENT

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

CORONARY: The Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off or On Pump Revascularization Study. Results at 1 Year

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 6 October 2010

Zurampic, Duzallo (lesinurad Products)

bivalirudin 250mg powder for concentrate for solution for injection or infusion (Angiox) SMC No. (638/10) The Medicines Company

Reflection paper on assessment of cardiovascular safety profile of medicinal products

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

Flaws, Bias, Misinterpretation and Fraud in Randomized Clinical Trials

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT ) Title: The Italian Elderly ACS Study Author: Stefano Savonitto. Date: 29 August 2011 Meeting: ESC congress, Paris

Case presentation. serum uric acid = 11.5 mg/dl 24-hour uric acid excretion = 300 mg

Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-525, NCT#

Regulatory Experience in Reviewing CV Safety for Diabetes

Cindy L. Grines MD FACC FSCAI

Table S1. Read and ICD 10 diagnosis codes for polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis

Satish K Surabhi, MD.FACC,FSCAI,RPVI Medical Director, Cardiac Cath Labs AnMed Health Heart & Vascular Care

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Using DOACs in CAD Patients in Sinus Ryhthm Results of the ATLAS ACS 2, COMPASS and COMMANDER-HF Trials

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

Outcomes in Hypertensive Black and Nonblack Patients Treated With Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, and Lisinopril JAMA. 2005;293:

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Transcription:

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial) William B. White, MD for the CARES Investigators Calhoun Cardiology Center University of Connecticut School of Medicine. Farmington

Committee Members and Coauthors William B. White, MD Michael A. Becker, MD Barbara Hunt, MS Philip B. Gorelick, MD Lhanoo Gunawardhana, MD, PhD Kenneth G. Saag, MD Jeffrey S. Borer, MD Majin Castillo, MD Andrew Whelton, MD

Background The risk of CV disease is elevated in people with gout. The mainstay of urate-lowering therapy in gout is the xanthine oxidase inhibitors Allopurinol is a purine analog xanthine oxidase inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of gout since 1966 Febuxostat is a non-purine xanthine oxidase inhibitor that was approved for the treatment of gout in 2009 An imbalance in CV events without a known mechanism was observed during clinical development (0.74 vs 0.60 events per 100 patient-years for febuxostat vs allopurinol) This led to a post-marketing requirement by the FDA to conduct the CARES trial to evaluate the CV safety of febuxostat CV, cardiovascular.

Objectives and Endpoints of CARES Primary objective: To demonstrate that major CV event rates with febuxostat are noninferior to allopurinol in patients with gout with CV disease Primary endpoint: Composite of first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and urgent revascularization for unstable angina Secondary endpoints: Evaluation of time from randomization to the first occurrence of MACE: Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke Other secondary endpoints: individual rates of CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke Other endpoint: All-cause mortality CV, cardiovascular; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction.

Study Design Randomized, double-blind, multicenter controlled study of febuxostat versus allopurinol in patients with gout and cardiovascular disease in the USA, Canada, and Mexico Febuxostat once daily (40 80 mg) (N=3098) Treatment period (up to 6 years) Allopurinol once daily* (200 600 mg) (N=3092) Days 21 to 1 Day 1 Month 1 Month 12 End of study 2- to 4-week follow-up Screening visit Baseline/ randomization Visits at Months 0.5, 3, 6, and 12 Visits every 6 months *At randomization, patients were stratified according to renal function. After randomization, dose titration of allopurinol was made on the basis of renal function. Febuxostat did not require dose adjustment by renal function. White WB, et al. Am Heart J 2012;164:14 20.

Study Patients Age 50 years old for males, 55 years old for females Diagnosis of gout based on American Rheumatism Association criteria Serum urate levels 7.0 mg/dl, or 6.0 mg/dl if flares or tophi present CV disease: Historical documentation of coronary, cerebrovascular, or peripheral arterial disease, or diabetes with small vessel disease Patients with unstable CV conditions, those with secondary hyperuricemia, or those with estimated creatinine clearance <30 ml/minute were excluded CV, cardiovascular.

Statistical Analyses Primary endpoint Cox PH model of time to primary endpoint stratified by baseline renal function, based on the modified ITT population One-sided 98.5% CI calculated for HR at final analysis Interim analyses for primary endpoint when 25%, 50%, and 75% of events were accrued Lan-DeMets-O Brien-Fleming-alpha spending function used to control overall one-sided significance level of 0.025 Noninferiority concluded if upper bound of repeated CI for HR (febuxostat to allopurinol) <1.3 Secondary and major exploratory endpoints Cox PH model of time to endpoint stratified by baseline renal function with two-sided 95% CI for HR CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat; PH, proportional hazards.

Disposition of Patients 6190 patients randomized and received 1 dose of study drug (modified ITT population) Febuxostat N=3098 Allopurinol N=3092 1397 (45.0%) Discontinued study visits early 1391 (44.9%) Discontinued study visits early 191 (6.2%) adverse events (includes death) 595 (19.2%) unwillingness to continue 52 (1.7%) major protocol deviation 226 (7.3%) lost to follow-up 333 (10.7%) other reason 172 (5.6%) adverse events (includes death) 587 (19.0%) unwillingness to continue 46 (1.5%) major protocol deviation 223 (7.2%) lost to follow-up 363 (11.7%) other reason ITT, intention-to-treat.

Baseline Patient Characteristics Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) Age Median, years 64.0 65.0 Patients 65 years, n (%) 1514 (48.9) 1586 (51.3) Sex Male, n (%) 2604 (84.1) 2592 (83.8) Race, n (%) White 2160 (69.7) 2140 (69.2) Black 552 (17.8) 593 (19.2) Asian 92 (3.0) 96 (3.1) Native American 262 (8.5) 234 (7.6) Kidney function (estimated creatinine clearance), n (%) Stages 1 and 2 1456 (47.0) 1459 (47.2) Stage 3 1636 (52.8) 1631 (52.7)

Baseline Patient Characteristics (2) Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) Duration of gout Mean, years 11.8 11.9 BMI Mean, kg/m 2 33.6 33.4 Serum urate Mean ± SD, mg/dl 8.7 ± 1.7 8.7 ± 1.7 Cardiovascular disease, n (%) Myocardial infarction 1197 (38.6) 1231 (39.8) Stroke 460 (14.8) 410 (13.3) Peripheral vascular disease 412 (13.3) 375 (12.1) Diabetes with small vessel disease 1193 (38.5) 1213 (39.2) Coronary revascularization 1129 (36.4) 1182 (38.2) BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation.

Baseline Cardiovascular Therapies Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) Concomitant medications at baseline, n (%) Antiplatelet agents Aspirin Thienopyridine 2397 (77.4) 1839 (59.4) 558 (18.0) 2473 (80.0) 1877 (60.7) 596 (19.3) Lipid-lowering agents 2293 (74.0) 2281 (73.8) β-blockers 1796 (58.0) 1834 (59.3) Renin angiotensin system blockers 2144 (69.2) 2187 (70.7)

Prior Urate-Lowering Therapies Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) Prior urate-lowering therapies, n (%) All agents 1914 (61.8) 1914 (61.9) Allopurinol 1738 (56.1) 1742 (56.3) Febuxostat 134 (4.3) 130 (4.2) Probenecid 37 (1.2) 36 (1.2) Other 5 (0.2) 6 (0.2)

Final Titrated Doses of Study Drug to Achieve a Serum Urate <6 mg/dl Doses of febuxostat (not adjusted for renal function) 40 mg 61% 80 mg 39% Doses of allopurinol (adjusted for renal function)* 200 mg 22% 300 mg 45% 400 mg 25% 500 mg 4% 600 mg 4% *Maximal doses of allopurinol were 600 mg for those with stage 1-2 chronic kidney disease and 400 mg for stage 3 chronic kidney disease. Median exposure for febuxostat was 728 days and for allopurinol was 719 days.

Changes in Biochemical Tests and Flare Rates The proportion of patients achieving serum urate levels of <6 mg/dl and <5 mg/dl was greater on febuxostat than on allopurinol Flare rates: 0.68 per patient-year on febuxostat 0.63 per patient-year on allopurinol No differences were observed between treatment groups throughout the trial for renal function, blood pressure, electrolytes, or lipids

Cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint (%) Time to Primary Endpoint (CV Death, Nonfatal MI, Nonfatal Stroke, Urgent Revascularization for UA) Modified ITT population; hazard ratio 1.03 (*one-sided repeated CI bound, 1.23) 25 20 Events, n (%) Allopurinol: 321 (10.4) Febuxostat: 335 (10.8) Febuxostat: Allopurinol: 15 10 5 Number of subjects at risk Febuxostat (n): Allopurinol (n): 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 Time (month) 3092 2764 2465 2080 1815 1560 1361 1132 933 767 589 437 258 3098 2784 2493 2111 1854 1589 1369 1165 955 778 573 441 264 *Using alpha=0.015. CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; ITT, intention-to-treat; MI, myocardial infarction; UA, unstable angina.

Secondary Endpoints Number (%) Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) Hazard ratio for febuxostat group (95% CI) Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke 296 (9.6) 271 (8.8) 1.09 (0.92, 1.28) CV death 134 (4.3) 100 (3.2) Nonfatal MI 111 (3.6) 118 (3.8) Nonfatal stroke 71 (2.3) 70 (2.3) Urgent revascularization due to unstable angina *P=0.034. CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction. 49 (1.6) 56 (1.8) 1.34 (1.03, 1.73)* 0.93 (0.72, 1.21) 1.01 (0.73, 1.41) 0.86 (0.59, 1.26)

Cumulative incidence of cardiovascular mortality (%) Cumulative incidence (%) Cumulative Incidence of all-cause mortality (%) Mortality Endpoints 25 20 Cardiovascular Mortality Modified ITT; hazard ratio 1.34 (95% CI 1.03, 1.73) Events, n (%) Febuxostat, 134 (4.3) Allopurinol, 100 (3.2) Febuxostat: Allopurinol: Events of adjudicated sudden cardiac death Febuxostat, 83 (2.7%) Allopurinol, 56 (1.8%) 25 20 Events, n (%) Febuxostat, 243 (7.8) Allopurinol, 199 (6.4) All-Cause Mortality Modified ITT; hazard ratio 1.22 (95% CI 1.01, 1.47) Febuxostat: Allopurinol: 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 Number of 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 subjects at risk Time (months) Febuxostat (n): 3098 2823 2550 2174 1922 1659 1440 1243 1033 838 627 482 288 Allopurinol (n): 3092 2807 2530 2152 1898 1637 1433 1204 1008 838 646 489 287 CI, confidence interval; ITT, intent-to-treat. 0 Number of 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 subjects at risk Time (months) Febuxostat (n): 3098 2828 2552 2179 1928 1666 1447 1251 1038 840 631 487 289 Allopurinol (n): 3092 2812 2540 2161 1906 1648 1444 1215 1015 842 650 489 288

On-Treatment Analysis* Number (%) Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) Primary endpoint 242 (7.8) 238 (7.7) CV death 62 (2.0) 41 (1.3) Nonfatal MI 93 (3.0) 106 (3.4) Nonfatal stroke 59 (1.9) 62 (2.0) Urgent revascularization due to unstable angina 45 (1.5) 44 (1.4) Death from any cause 92 (3.0) 72 (2.3) Hazard ratio for febuxostat group (95% CI) 1.00 (0.82, 1.22)** 1.49 (1.01, 2.22) 0.87 (0.66, 1.34) 0.94 (0.66, 1.34) 1.00 (0.66, 1.52) 1.26 (0.93, 1.72) *Prespecified: On drug and up to 30 days off drug; **97.0% CI; P=0.047. CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction.

All-Cause Mortality Incorporating Known Vital Status Number (%) Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) Hazard ratio for febuxostat group (95% CI) Intention-to-treat analysis 332 (10.7) 309 (10.0) 1.09 (0.94, 1.28) On drug 36 (1.2) 28 (0.9) 1.27 (0.77, 2.08) On drug and within 30 days of drug discontinuation 94 (3.0) 74 (2.4) 1.25 (0.92, 1.70) CI, confidence interval.

Subgroup Analyses for Cardiovascular Mortality Baseline characteristic NSAID use, % (n/n) Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) RR (95% CI) febuxostat vs allopurinol P value for heterogeneity Yes 5.7 (33/579) 2.5 (16/650) 2.32 (1.29, 4.16) 0.036 No 4.0 (101/2519) 3.4 (84/2442) 1.17 (0.88, 1.55) Low-dose aspirin use (<325 mg) Yes 3.6 (45/1239) 3.9 (48/1222) 0.92 (0.62, 1.38) 0.019 No 4.0 (101/2519) 3.4 (84/2442) 1.17 (0.88, 1.55) Colchicine use during study Yes 5.0 (35/699) 2.3 (16/694) 2.17 (1.21, 3.89) 0.062 No 4.1 (99/2399) 3.5 (84/2398) 1.18 (0.89, 1.57) CI, confidence interval; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; RR, relative risk.

Summary Rates of major adverse CV events on febuxostat were noninferior to allopurinol in patients with gout and CV disease All-cause mortality was greater on febuxostat versus allopurinol due to an imbalance in CV deaths, particularly sudden cardiac death These observations occurred in the following context: Urate lowering on febuxostat was greater than allopurinol Similar gout flare rates between groups during the trial No differences between groups for serum potassium, lipids, glucose, creatinine, or blood pressure No preclinical signals for cardiac toxicity observed with febuxostat No differences in the rates of major nonfatal cardiovascular events CV, cardiovascular.

Summary (2) There was a high rate of study discontinuation (45%) Rates of withdrawal were similar in the febuxostat and allopurinol groups Sensitivity analysis (on treatment plus 30 days within discontinuation of study drug) showed: Similar rates of the primary endpoint on febuxostat and allopurinol, comparable with the modified ITT analysis Higher rates of all-cause and CV death on febuxostat versus allopurinol were also comparable with the modified ITT analysis The majority of deaths occurred off drug Further safety analyses from the trial are ongoing to evaluate the unexpected mortality findings in CARES CV, cardiovascular; ITT, intent-to-treat.

Available now at NEJM.org