Plaintiff, Comfort Dental Group, Inc. ( Comfort Dental ), by its attorneys, MOYE WHITE LLP, states: INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
Case 1:17-cv ECF No. 1 filed 10/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DEFAMATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Associates, llc, for its Complaint against the defendants, Gary K. DeJohn, Sr. and DeJohn

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. COME NOW Plaintiffs by and through their attorneys of record J.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 1:15-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:09-cv RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Case 2:12-cv KJM-GGH Document 1 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. (Sacramento Division)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED CANNABIS CORPORATION. Plaintiff, PURE HEMP COLLECTIVE INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Case No.: Plaintiffs Tammie Aust, Alison Grennan, Jennifer Schill, and Lang You Mau, by and

4. Together, defendants CCA and CCC represent the vast majority of chiropractors practicing in Connecticut.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:15-cv SRC-CLW Document 9 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 246

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Case: 3:17-cv wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:19-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/28/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/28/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Civil Action No. 8:14-cv-1322 COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No.: COMPLAINT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/22/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/22/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INFORMATION. General Allegations. A. Introduction and Background

Case 1:15-cv ARR-VVP Document 1 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendant. COMPLAINT

v. No. COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, PERSONAL INJURIES, AND VIOLATIONS OF THE NEW MEXICO TORT CLAIMS ACT

State of Connecticut Department of Education Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services Bureau of Special Education

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 21

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. ( OAI ) answers and asserts its affirmative

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GENERAL JURISDICTION AND COMMON FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 5:04-cv gwc Document 195 Filed 04/16/07 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv JLK Document 6 Filed 01/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 12/12/2008 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

If you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from MAGNETIC STIMULATION ( TMS )

Case 4:14-cv BSM Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 19 FILED

FILED STATE OF CALIFORNIA - MEDICAL"BOARD OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO /JtJIJtl?J/xr 2" 20.JL BY I< /krjr!!j ANALYST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) Case No.

Case 3:14-cv JWD-RLB Document 1 11/25/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA (BATON ROUGE)

2:12-cv VAR-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 08/02/12 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 24

Case 3:18-cv ARC-MCC Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLANIA

Case 3:14-cv JM-WVG Document 1 Filed 11/03/14 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:12-cv LRH-GWF Document 1 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 26

Illinois Supreme Court. Language Access Policy

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 361 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2017

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY FRANKFORT DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WASHINGTON STATE CAUSE NO SEA

WESTUE RSDDISSTTRRI CTTCAORUKRATN sas

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv SEH Document 1 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 12

Article XIX DENTAL HYGIENIST COLLABORATIVE CARE PROGRAM

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Appeal and Grievance Procedure

Drug Court Administrator M. Keithley Williams (telephone) (fax)

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

Case 1:17-cv RDM Document 1 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

effect that the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act ( FSPTCA ), which was

NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1250

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

In re: ) ) NOTICE OF CHARGES John E. Marshall, M.D., ) AND ALLEGATIONS; ) NOTICE OF HEARING Respondent. )

Case 4:15-cv BRW Document 1 Filed 05/21/15 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

DELTA DENTAL PREMIER

AFFILIATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT

Case 2:09-cv RCJ-RJJ Document 1 Filed 07/22/2009 Page 1 of 15

Administering Medicines to Students Asthma Inhaler Exemption

Case 8:10-cv JDW-MAP Document 11 Filed 06/14/11 Page 1 of 18 PageID 79 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Transcription:

JEFFERSON COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF COLORADO Address: 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 Telephone: (303) 271-6145 Plaintiff: COMFORT DENTAL GROUP, INC., a Colorado Corporation, v. Defendants: DR. SALLY PRESTON, an individual. Attorneys for Defendants Eric B. Liebman (#27051) William F. Jones (#35294) Joshua P. Kweller (#40686) MOYE WHITE LLP 1400 16th Street, 6th Floor Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 292-2900 Facsimile: (303) 292-4510 Email: eric.liebman@moyewhite.com billy.jones@moyewhite.com josh.kweller@moyewhite.com COURT USE ONLY Case No.: Division/Courtroom: COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Comfort Dental Group, Inc. ( Comfort Dental ), by its attorneys, MOYE WHITE LLP, states: INTRODUCTION 1. This case arises from Defendant Dr. Sally Preston s ( Dr. Preston ) slanderous statement made regarding the quality of Comfort Dental s professional services. Dr. Preston, an assistant professor of dentistry at the University of Colorado Dental School, denigrated the dental work and professional care performed by Comfort Dental dentists by telling a student that it was typical of Comfort Dental dentists to do shoddy work and leave it for another dentist correct the situation with no basis for the untrue statement. Comfort Dental seeks damages to rectify the harm it has suffered.

PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 2. Comfort Dental is a Colorado corporation with its principal place of business at 2540 Kipling Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215. 3. Defendant Dr. Sally Preston ( Dr. Preston ) is a Colorado citizen who upon information and belief resides at 8 White Fir Court, Littleton, Colorado 80127. 4. Jurisdiction is proper in Colorado pursuant to C.R.S. 13-1-124 and the United States and Colorado constitutions as the acts complained of herein occurred in Colorado. 5. Venue is proper in this judicial district and county pursuant to C.R.C.P. 98(c) as among other things, upon information and belief, Defendant resides in Jefferson County. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 6. Comfort Dental provides affordable dental care and is the largest dental franchise in the United States. Each office is independently owned and operated. 7. Dr. Preston is an assistant professor in the Department of Surgical Dentistry at the University of Colorado School of Dental Medicine ( CU Dental School ). 8. CU Dental School operates an emergency clinic ( Emergency Clinic ) that provides urgent and emergency care for patients at rates commonly less than those charged by private practitioners. Treatment is provided by dental students under the supervision of CU Dental School faculty. 9. Dr. Preston has provided such supervision to dental students at the Emergency Clinic. 10. On information and belief, in August or September 2013, a patient came into the Emergency Clinic for dental services. 11. A dental student performed an initial in-take write-up on the patient. In this initial write-up, the patient told the dental student that she had received a dental crown from a Comfort Dental dentist. The patient stated that she had been in pain so she went back to the Comfort Dental dentist, who gave her an antibiotic for the pain. When the pain persisted, the patient came to the Emergency Clinic. 12. On information and belief, Dr. Preston was supervising the dental student for this patient, but was not present when the dental student performed the initial write-up with the patient. When the dental student described the patient s history to Dr. Preston, Dr. Preston responded to the dental student that this treatment was typical Comfort Dental, just give them an injection and send them to us. 2

13. Dr. Preston s statement is not based upon any facts or truth, as Dr. Preston had no basis for determining the patient s motivation for coming to the Emergency Clinic, if the patient was not satisfied with Comfort Dental s service, or if the dental work performed by Comfort Dental was typical or substandard. 14. Dr. Preston s actions were willful and wanton in that she was consciously aware that her statements were not based upon any facts or truth and would harm Comfort Dental, but nonetheless intentionally made the defamatory statement without regard for the risk of harm to Comfort Dental. 15. As a result of Dr. Preston s statement, Comfort Dental s reputation has been damaged. 16. Based on information and belief, Dr. Preston is likely to continue to make false and disparaging statements about Comfort Dental. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Defamation Outside the Scope of Employment) herein. 17. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth 18. As demonstrated more fully above, Defendant made a defamatory statement concerning Comfort Dental and the conduct of its business, including, but not limited to, the following: a. Stating that it was standard and typical practice for Comfort Dental dentists to fail to care for their patients in that Comfort Dental dentists would perform only the bare minimum necessary care and would leave their patients to receive follow-up care from other sources, while having no basis for such assertions. 19. Defendant published this defamatory statement to third parties. 20. This defamatory statement relates to the conduct of Comfort Dental s business and professional reputation and thus is per se defamatory. 21. The substance or gist of the defamatory statement is false at the time Dr. Preston made it. 22. Dr. Preston s act was willful and wanton in that Dr. Preston knew the defamatory statement was false and/or made the statements with reckless disregard as to its falsity and the harm that would be caused by her statement. 3

23. Dr. Preston made the defamatory statement while outside the scope of her employment as an assistant professor in that her defamatory statement was unrelated to the work assigned to her, was not incidental to the work assigned to her, and provided no benefit to her employer. 24. As a result of the defamatory statement, Comfort Dental has suffered damages in an amount to be proven at trial, including, but not limited to, actual damages, interest, costs, attorney s fees, and expenses of litigation. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Defamation in the Alternative to the First Claim for Relief) herein. 25. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth 26. As demonstrated more fully above, Defendant made a defamatory statement concerning Comfort Dental and the conduct of its business, including, but not limited to, the following: a. Stating that it was standard and typical practice for Comfort Dental dentists to fail to care for their patients in that Comfort Dental dentists would perform only the bare minimum necessary care and would leave their patients to receive follow-up care from other sources, while having no basis for such assertions. 27. Defendant published this defamatory statement to third parties. 28. This defamatory statement relates to the conduct of Comfort Dental s business and professional reputation and thus is per se defamatory. 29. The substance or gist of the defamatory statement is false at the time Dr. Preston made it. 30. Dr. Preston s act was willful and wanton in that Dr. Preston knew the defamatory statement was false and/or made the statements with reckless disregard as to its falsity and the harm that would be caused by her statement. 31. As a result of the defamatory statement, Comfort Dental has suffered damages in an amount to be proven at trial, including, but not limited to, actual damages, interest, costs, attorney s fees, and expenses of litigation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Comfort Dental Group, Inc. respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Comfort Dental Group, Inc. and against Dr. Sally Preston as follows: 4

a. For damages in an amount to be proven at trial as to Comfort Dental s claims for defamation; b. For a preliminary and permanent injunction against Dr. Preston from making false statements regarding Comfort Dental; c. For all costs, expenses and attorneys fees as allowed by law; d. For pre- and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and e. For such other and further relief this Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted this day of December, 2013. MOYE WHITE LLP By: /s/ Eric. B. Liebman Eric B. Liebman (#27051) William F. Jones (#35294) Joshua P. Kweller (#40686) 16 Market Square 1400 16 th Street, 6 th Floor Denver, Colorado 80202-1027 Telephone: (303) 292-2900 Facsimile: (303) 292-4510 Email: eric.liebman@moyewhite.com Email: billy.jones@moyewhite.com Email: josh.kweller@moyewhite.com Attorneys for Comfort Dental Group, Inc. ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF: Comfort Dental Group, Inc. 2540 Kipling Street Lakewood, Colorado 80215 5