Troubleshooting Audio

Similar documents
Troubleshooting Audio

Troubleshooting Audio

PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program

Troubleshooting Audio

PPS Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program Relationship Matrix of Program Measures by Years and Quarters

PPS Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program Relationship Matrix of Program Measures by Years and Quarters

Troubleshooting Audio

Nancy Hailpern, Director, Regulatory Affairs K Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20005

End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program (ESRD QIP) Status Type NQF Measure Title

CMS Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures for the FY 2020 Payment Update

Welcome! 10/29/2015 1

CMS Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures for the FY 2019 Payment Update

Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting (IPFQR) Program

Measure Applications Partnership. Hospital Workgroup In-Person Meeting Follow- Up Call

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Acute Care Hospital Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 Quality Improvement Program Measures

CMS Measures - Fiscal Year 2019

Identifying Initial Populations and Sampling for OCM and EBRT. Henrietta C. Hight, BA, BSN, RN, CCM, CDMS, CPHQ Quality Improvement Specialist

Troubleshooting Audio

Troubleshooting Audio

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Andrew B. Wheeler Vice President of Federal Finance

Connecting the Pieces on Kt/V with Dr. Jesse Roach With CROWNWeb Outreach, Communication, and Training (OCT)

Troubleshooting Audio

End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Network Learning and Action Network (LAN) Series: Bloodstream Infection (BSI) Quality Improvement Activity

NQF-ENDORSED VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARD FOR HOSPITAL CARE. Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Outcome Measures (Claims Based)

Mandatory Elements of Healthcare Reform Walter Coleman. healthcare consulting

Program Objectives Hospice Compare

PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospitals Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program

Hospice Quality Reporting Program Provider Training

Partial Hospitalization Program Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Sixth Edition. Prepared by

Heart Attack Readmissions in Virginia

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Outcome High Priority

PfP Quality Metrics: Readmissions, Value-Based Purchasing and Beyond

CMS Hospital IQR Program Measure Comparison Tables FY 2018 (CY 2016) Measures Required to Meet Hospital IQR APU Requirements NHSN Submission

Table of Contents. Current and Proposed CMS Quality Measures for Reporting in 2017 through 2023 Revised 8/8/2017

PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospitals Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program

Troubleshooting Audio

Troubleshooting Audio

Cancer Center Dashboard

August 29, Dear Dr. Berwick:

What ASMBS Members Need to Know About: New Medicare Payment Policy Governing Bariatric Surgery and Hospital Acquired Conditions (HACs)

Appendix G Explanation/Clarification Summary

APPENDIX EXHIBITS. Appendix Exhibit A2: Patient Comorbidity Codes Used To Risk- Standardize Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates page 10

Stratis Health

Troubleshooting Audio

50198 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 157 / Monday, August 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Troubleshooting Audio

Short-term Acute Care Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Twenty-third Edition. Prepared by

Quality Reporting for CAHs and Rural PPS Hospitals: The Potential Impact of Composite Measures

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

Tennessee s Tenth Report on Healthcare-Associated Infections: Overview of Report, Methodology, and Format

Infection Control: Meeting the Challenge

SCORES FOR 4 TH QUARTER, RD QUARTER, 2014

Table of Contents. Current and Proposed CMS Quality Measures for Reporting in 2017 through 2023 Revised 5/4/2017

USING THE WEBEX Q&A FEATURE

THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM

Great Lakes Partners for Patients: Hospital Improvement Innovation Network - Encyclopedia of Measures Frequently Asked Questions

NQF-ENDORSED VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARDS FOR HOSPITAL CARE. Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Outcome Measures (Claims Based)

2016 Hospital Measures

Technical Appendix for Outcome Measures

NEW JERSEY 2011 HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Performance Measure. Inpatient Clinical Process of Care Measures

2016 Condition-Specific Measures Updates and Specifications Report Hospital-Level 30-Day Risk-Standardized Readmission Measures

Trends in Hospice Utilization

Appendix Identification of Study Cohorts

CAH Participation and Quality Measure Results for Hospital Compare 2007 Discharges and Trends: National and North Carolina Results

Objectives. Medicare Spending per Beneficiary: Analyzing MSPB Data to Identify Primary Drivers

2017 CMS Web Interface Reporting

Medicare Hospital Acquired Conditions Reduction Program Andrew B. Wheeler Vice President of Federal Finance

Short-term Acute Care Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Twenty-second Edition. Prepared by

Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program

April 7, Introduction

Kansas Care Coordination Quarterly Report October 2018

Short-term Acute Care Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Sixteenth Edition. Prepared by

Management of Heart Failure: Review of the Performance Measures by the Performance Measurement Committee of the American College of Physicians

Public Policy HCA Public Policy No

2011 Measures Maintenance Technical Report: Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia 30 Day Risk Standardized Readmission Measures

ACTIVE INCISION MANAGEMENT: A PLAN FOR PROTECTING YOUR SURGICAL RESULTS, YOUR PATIENTS AND YOUR HOSPITAL.

Statewide Statistics and Key Findings 1

LRE Executive Dashboard Integrated Care Delivery Platform (ICDP)

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

ACO #44 Use of Imaging Studies for Low Back Pain

JAWDA Performance Quarterly KPI Profile (Clinic & Centers) March 2018

COOK COUNTY HEALTH Meaningful Metrics

Putting the Patient First: How Advocate Healthcare Reduced Readmissions, LOS and Costs Through an Integrated Nutrition Care Process

Final Recommendation for Updating the Quality Based Reimbursement Program

Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models (EPMs): Summary of the Proposed Rule

Core = Core required measures for all CAH nationally r = Required by State of Minnesota X = Additional for MBQIP

Specifications Manual Update: Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program

The table below includes the quality measures an ACO is required to submit to CMS as a participant in an MSSP Track 3 ACO

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Rapid Response Teams. January 17, Safe Table Webinar

Comparison of Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Treated in Ambulatory Surgical Centers and Hospital Outpatient Departments

In each hospital-year, we calculated a 30-day unplanned. readmission rate among patients who survived at least 30 days

COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY ALLIANCE YOU WON T BELIEVE WHAT CMS WILL BE REPORTING ON YOUR ONCOLOGISTS

Getting to the core of customer satisfaction in skilled nursing and assisted living. Satisfaction Questionnaire & User s Manual

FY X Time (48 hrs for cardiac surgery) SCIP-Inf-4 Cardiac Surgery Patients With Controlled 6 A.M. Postoperative Blood

HEART FAILURE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. American Heart Association Shawni Smith Regional Director, Quality & Systems Improvement

The Cost Burden of Worsening Heart Failure in the Medicare Fee For Service Population: An Actuarial Analysis

Transcription:

Welcome Audio for this event is available via ReadyTalk Internet streaming. No telephone line is required. Computer speakers or headphones are necessary to listen to streaming audio. Limited dial-in lines are available. Please send a chat message if needed. This event is being recorded. 1

Troubleshooting Audio Audio from computer speakers breaking up? Audio suddenly stop? Click the Refresh icon or Select F5 F5 Key Top Row of Keyboard Location of Buttons Refresh 2

Troubleshooting Echo Hear a bad echo on the call? Echo is caused by multiple browsers/tabs open to a single event (multiple audio feeds). Close all but one browser/tab and the echo will clear. Example of Two Browsers/Tabs Open in Same Event 3

Submitting Questions Type questions in the Chat with presenter section, located in the bottom-left corner of your screen. 4

PCHQR Program: Overview of the 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients (NQF #3188) Measure Denise Morse, MBA Senior Manager, Quality Analytics, City of Hope National Medical Center Moderator Lisa Vinson, BS, BSN, RN Program Lead, PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program Hospital Inpatient Value, Incentives, and Quality Reporting (VIQR) Outreach and Education Support Contractor (SC) November 29, 2018

Acronyms and Abbreviations ADCC C4QI CAUTI CDI CE CLABSI CMS CST FY HCAHPS Alliance of Dedicated Cancer Centers Comprehensive Cancer Centers Consortium for Quality Improvement catheter-associated urinary tract infection Clostridium difficile Infection Continuing Education central line-associated bloodstream infection Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Cancer-Specific Treatment Fiscal Year Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ICD-CM IPPS LTCH MRSA NQF PCH PCHQR PPS Q RSRR SC SSI VIQR International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification inpatient prospective payment system long-term care hospital Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia National Quality Forum PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting prospective payment system quarter Risk-Standardized Readmission Rate support contractor Surgical Site Infection Value, Incentives, and Quality Reporting Back 6

Purpose This presentation will discuss the 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients (National Quality Forum [NQF] #3188) measure in the PCHQR Program. This discussion will: Explain the development, endorsement, and application of the measure. Assist in understanding the measure specifications. Share lessons learned for the purpose of quality improvement. 7

Objectives Upon completion of this program, participants will be able to: Discuss the history of Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients metric development and implementation. Clearly state the requirements and methodology for Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients. Discuss how centers can use the Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients for performance improvement. 8

PCHQR Program: Overview of the 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients (NQF #3188) Measure NQF #3188 Overview 9

Why is looking at cancer-specific readmissions important? Cancer is the second most common cause of death in the US. There is an estimated 1.7 million new cancer cases to be diagnosed in 2018. The incidence is increasing per year as the population is aging. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality estimates the direct medical costs for cancer in 2015 were $80.2 billion, with 38% of the cost occurring during inpatient hospital stays.* Unplanned readmissions can contribute to higher costs and lower quality of care. A focused look at potentially preventable readmissions can reveal opportunities for improved patient-centered and quality care at a lower overall cost. *American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2018 10

Current NQF Endorsed Readmissions Metrics Current readmissions metrics do not focus specifically on cancer patients. The current NQF-endorsed readmissions metrics include: All-Cause Readmissions Index Hospital 30-Day, All-Cause, Risk-Standardized Readmission Rate (RSRR) Following Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization (NQF #0505) Hospital 30-Day, All-Cause, Risk-Standardized Readmission Rate (RSRR) Following Vascular Procedures (NQF #2513) Hospital 30-Day, Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (NQF #0695) Hospital 30-Day, All-Cause, Risk-Standardized Readmission Rate (RSRR) Following Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Hospitalization (NQF #1891) Hospital 30-Day, All-Cause, Risk-Standardized Readmission Rate (RSRR) Following Heart Failure Hospitalization (NQF #0330) 11

C4QI and ADCC Collaboration The Comprehensive Cancer Center Consortium for Quality Improvement (C4QI) is a collaborative group of centers that meets regularly to share best practices with the goal of improving quality for all cancer patients. The C4QI centers recognized the need for a readmissions measure that would help focus on potentially preventable readmissions and provide opportunities for improvement. Using a shared database, the C4QI centers went through several iterations of the metric inclusions and exclusions. The cancer centers worked with their physicians, clinical staff, ancillary staff, and coding/billing teams to identify code sets and applicability to the populations. The Alliance of Dedicated Cancer Centers (ADCC) recognized the applicability of this measure to the PCHQR Program and worked with the NQF to refine and submit the measure specifications for endorsement and use in future program years. 12

NQF and PCHQR Program The 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients measure was submitted to NQF and received endorsement in 2017. The metric was added to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS)/Long- Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System (LTCH PPS) Final Rule. The metric will be reported for the FY 2021 program year and subsequent years. The metric, as written, can apply to all cancer patients at any short-term acute care hospital. 13

Readmissions Data Submission and Process 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients (NQF #3188) is a claims-based measure. No data submission will be required from PCHs. 14

Numerator Statement The numerator includes all eligible unplanned readmissions to any short-term acute care within 30 days of the discharge date from an index admission that is included in the measure denominator. Readmissions with an admission type (UB-04 Uniform Bill Locator 14) of emergency = 1 or urgent = 2 are considered unplanned readmissions within this measure. Readmissions for patients with progression of disease (using a principal diagnosis of metastatic disease as a proxy) and for patients with planned admissions for treatment (defined as a principal diagnosis of chemotherapy or radiation therapy) are excluded from the measure numerator. 15

Numerator Exclusion Codes The following readmissions are excluded from the measure numerator: 1. Primary Claim Diagnosis Code of metastatic disease (ICD-9-CM range: 196 198.89, 209.70 209.79; ICD-10-CM range: C77.0 C79.9, C7B.0 C7B.8) o Rationale: A primary (or principal) diagnosis of metastatic disease serves as a proxy for disease progression. Readmissions for conditions or symptoms associated with disease progression are not reflective of poor clinical care but, rather, advanced disease. 2. Patients with a Primary Claim Diagnosis Code of chemotherapy or radiation encounter (ICD-9-CM range: V58.00 V58.12; ICD-10-CM range: Z51.00 Z51.12) o Rationale: Readmissions are expected and planned for some patients who require additional cancer treatment in the inpatient setting. These readmissions reflects high-quality care that is focused on patient safety and are reliably distinguishable in claims data. 16

Denominator Statement The denominator includes inpatient admissions for all adult Fee-for-Service Medicare beneficiaries where the patient is discharged from a short-term acute care hospital (PCH, short-term acute care PPS hospital, or critical access hospital) with a principal or secondary diagnosis (i.e., not admitting diagnosis) of malignant cancer within the defined measurement period. Denominator Exclusions: The following index admissions are excluded from the measure denominator: 1. Less than 18 years of age 2. Patients who died during the index admission 3. Patients discharged against medical advice 4. Patients transferred to another acute care hospital during the index admission 5. Patients discharged with a planned readmission 6. Patients having missing or incomplete data 7. Patients not admitted to an inpatient bed 17

Risk Adjustment The rates will be risk adjusted using a logistic regression model. Risk factors for consideration: o o o o o o o Gender Intensive care unit stays Comorbidities Disease type - solid tumor Length of stay Age Discharge location Per the FY 2019 IPPS/LTCH PPS Final Rule, the following equation was used to generate the risk-adjusted 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients rate: 18

PCHQR Program: Overview of the 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients (NQF #3188) Measure Use of NQF #3188 in Performance Improvement at City of Hope 19

Performance Improvement Utilization City of Hope is currently using the 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients measure as part of the internal quality reporting and performance improvement. The measure is part of a readmissions task force, embedded into the physician department quarterly quality reports, and included on The Joint Commission-mandated ongoing professional practice evaluations. There are three specific performance improvement projects: o Cystectomy o Post-discharge phone calls o Symptom management/triage support 20

Performance Improvement Project: Cystectomy The initial project following the creation of the measure focused on surgical readmissions. Data from the Vizient/University HealthSystem Consortium database showed City of Hope had a higherthan-expected rate of readmissions post-cystectomy. o City of Hope had a 30% higher rate of readmissions than the aggregate of the other cancer centers. Using the readmission measure, we isolated the patient population with potentially preventable readmissions. o The metric specifications allowed the team to remove the planned admissions and focus on patients admitted for more acute conditions. 21

Performance Improvement Project: Cystectomy (continued) The reasons for readmissions were the following: o Fever o Dehydration o Complications The symptom-related reasons for admission were concerning and led to opportunities for improvement in outpatient management of patients, including discharge instructions and more timely follow-up visits. This discovery led to the creation of the Cystectomy Care Pathway which focused preventing future readmissions AND completely changing the way these patients were treated from initial consultation through the post-operative period. 22

Performance Improvement Project: Post-Discharge Phone Calls Use of the metric also identified opportunities to reduce post- stem cell transplant readmissions in both the autologous and allogeneic populations. A review of the data for the transplant patient population showed that those patients who were readmitted could benefit from additional post-discharge support to answer questions and identify potential health outcomes earlier. A pilot program was started to provide post-discharge follow-up phone calls to all inpatient transplant discharges. The results showed an almost 30% decrease of readmissions in the population and sustained reduction during the past two years. 23

Performance Improvement Project: Symptom Management/Triage Support Currently, City of Hope uses data from the readmissions metric to work on improving overall symptom management and triage support tools. The data from the readmissions metric helps inform the work with patients most at risk for readmission, symptoms most often seen in readmitted patients, and services that could serve as pilot populations. 24

Resources FY 2019 IPPS/LTCH PPS Final Rule (83 FR 41613 through 41616) NQF measure specifications: All-Cause Admissions and Readmission Portfolio 25

PCHQR Program: Overview of the 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients (NQF #3188) Measure Key Dates and Reminders 26

Important Upcoming Dates Tentative Outreach and Education Event Dates o December 19, 2018 o January 24, 2019 Upcoming Data Submissions o January 3, 2019 Quarter (Q) 3 2018 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Survey o February 15, 2019 Q4 2017 Cancer-Specific Treatment (CST) hormone data Q3 2018 healthcare-acquired infection measure data CLABSI, CAUTI, CDI, MRSA, and SSI 27

Hospital Compare Key Dates February 2019 Refresh o Contains: Q4 2016 through Q3 2017 CST chemotherapy data Q2 2016 through Q1 2017 CST hormone data Q2 2017 through Q1 2018 HCAHPS Survey data Q1 2017 through Q4 2017 Oncology Care Measure data Q1 2017 through Q4 2017 External Beam Radiotherapy data o Preview period: December 1 31, 2018 o Anticipated refresh date: February 13, 2019 April 2019 Refresh o Contains: Q1 2017 through Q4 2017 CST chemotherapy data Q3 2016 through Q2 2017 CST hormone data Q3 2017 through Q2 2018 HCAHPS Survey data o Tentative preview period: February 1 March 2, 2019 o Tentative refresh date: April 25, 2019 28

Accessing the QualityNet Questions and Answers Tool QualityNet Questions and Answers Tool 29

PCHQR Program: Overview of the 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions for Cancer Patients (NQF #3188) Measure Questions 30

Disclaimer This presentation was current at the time of publication and/or upload onto the Quality Reporting Center and QualityNet websites. Medicare policy changes frequently. Any links to Medicare online source documents are for reference use only. In the case that Medicare policy, requirements, or guidance related to this presentation change following the date of posting, this presentation will not necessarily reflect those changes; given that it will remain as an archived copy, it will not be updated. This presentation was prepared as a service to the public and is not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Any references or links to statutes, regulations, and/or other policy materials included in the presentation are provided as summary information. No material contained therein is intended to take the place of either written laws or regulations. In the event of any conflict between the information provided by the presentation and any information included in any Medicare rules and/or regulations, the rules and regulations shall govern. The specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials should be reviewed independently for a full and accurate statement of their contents. 31