Bone Mineral Density and Its Associated Factors in Naresuan University Staff

Similar documents
DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK SCORING SYSTEM TO PREDICT A RISK OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURES IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN

Nutritional Aspects of Osteoporosis Care and Treatment Cynthia Smith, FNP-BC, RN, MSN, CCD Pars Osteoporosis Clinic, Belpre, Ohio

To understand bone growth and development across the lifespan. To develop a better understanding of osteoporosis.

Dr Tuan V NGUYEN. Mapping Translational Research into Individualised Prognosis of Fracture Risk

Osteoporosis International. Original Article. Bone Mineral Density and Vertebral Fractures in Men

Bone Mass Measurement BONE MASS MEASUREMENT HS-042. Policy Number: HS-042. Original Effective Date: 8/25/2008

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

New York State County Comparison of Fall-related Hip Fractures of Older Adults and Number of Dual-X-ray Absorptiometry Machines

Challenging the Current Osteoporosis Guidelines. Carolyn J. Crandall, MD, MS Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

An audit of osteoporotic patients in an Australian general practice

Building Bone Density-Research Issues

Coordinator of Post Professional Programs Texas Woman's University 1

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Endocr Pract. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 11.

Original Article. Ramesh Keerthi Gadam, MD 1 ; Karen Schlauch, PhD 2 ; Kenneth E. Izuora, MD, MBA 1 ABSTRACT

Comparison of Bone Density of Distal Radius With Hip and Spine Using DXA

Interpreting DEXA Scan and. the New Fracture Risk. Assessment. Algorithm

Risk factors associated with low bone mineral density in Ajman, UAE

Learning Objectives. Controversies in Osteoporosis Prevention and Management. Etiology. Presenter Disclosure Information. Epidemiology.

Osteoporosis. Overview

Correlation between Thyroid Function and Bone Mineral Density in Elderly People

Diagnostische Präzision von DXL im Vergleich zu DXA bei pmp Frauen mit Frakturen

International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2017; 3(4): DOI:

Systemic Bone Density and Clinical Oral Health Status in Menopause Women

Correspondence should be addressed to Jayadevan Sreedharan,

DXA When to order? How to interpret? Dr Nikhil Tandon Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi

Module 5 - Speaking of Bones Osteoporosis For Health Professionals: Fracture Risk Assessment. William D. Leslie, MD MSc FRCPC

ASJ. How Many High Risk Korean Patients with Osteopenia Could Overlook Treatment Eligibility? Asian Spine Journal. Introduction

Skeletal Manifestations

Bone Densitometry. What is a Bone Density Scan (DXA)? What are some common uses of the procedure?

Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

An audit of bone densitometry practice with reference to ISCD, IOF and NOF guidelines

Norland Densitometry A Tradition of Excellence

Clinician s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis

Body Mass Index as Predictor of Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women in India

Bone density scanning and osteoporosis

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: , Volume 2, Issue 7, August 2014

Pharmacy Management Drug Policy

Omnisense: At Least As Good As DXA

O. Bruyère M. Fossi B. Zegels L. Leonori M. Hiligsmann A. Neuprez J.-Y. Reginster

Study of secondary causes of male osteoporosis

HIV and your Bones Osteopenia and Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis/Fracture Prevention

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 7, July-2017 ISSN ,393

Osteoporosis is estimated to develop in 1 out of 4 women over the age of 50. Influence of bone densitometry results on the treatment of osteoporosis

Use of DXA / Bone Density in the Care of Your Patients. Brenda Lee Holbert, M.D. Associate Professor Senior Staff Radiologist

The official position of the International Society for Clinical

Bone Density Measurement in Women

Clinical Study Comparison of QCT and DXA: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Postmenopausal Women

Concordance of a Self Assessment Tool and Measurement of Bone Mineral Density in Identifying the Risk of Osteoporosis in Elderly Taiwanese Women

Measuring Bone Mineral Density

DEXA T-score Concordance and Discordance Between hip and Lumbar Spine

International Journal of Research and Review E-ISSN: ; P-ISSN:

Horizon Scanning Centre March Denosumab for glucocorticoidinduced SUMMARY NIHR HSC ID: 6329

BONE MINERAL DENSITY OF BANGLADESHI PEOPLE

Purpose. Methods and Materials

Bone Mineral Density in Thai Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C, before and after Treatment with Pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin Combination ABSTRACT

Bone mineral density of patients attending a clinic in Dubai

Objectives. Discuss bone health and the consequences of osteoporosis on patients medical and disability status.

Assessment of the risk of osteoporotic fractures in Prof. J.J. Body, MD, PhD CHU Brugmann Univ. Libre de Bruxelles

WHAT KEEPS OUR BONES STRONG?

Official Positions on FRAX

Osteodensitometry in primary and secondary osteoporosis

Osteoporosis. By Amanda Neilson

Pharmacy Management Drug Policy

AACE/ACE Osteoporosis Treatment Decision Tool

Objectives: What is Osteoporosis 10/8/2015. Bone Health/ Osteoporosis: BASICS OF SCREENING, INTERPRETING, AND TREATING

The bone mass concept: problems in short stature

Guideline for the investigation and management of osteoporosis. for hospitals and General Practice

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY POSITION STATEMENT. Committee on Rheumatologic Care

Effect of Precision Error on T-scores and the Diagnostic Classification of Bone Status

Clinical Densitometry

Osteoporosis: Are your bones at risk of fracturing? Rachel Wallwork, MD Internal medicine resident Massachusetts General Hospital

Beyond the T-score: New Thinking in Osteoporosis 2

Additional Research is Needed to Determine the Effects of Soy Protein on Calcium Binding and Absorption NDFS 435 3/26/2015. Dr.

2013 ISCD Official Positions Adult

2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media,

Chapter 39: Exercise prescription in those with osteoporosis

Bone loss in Postmenopausal former Unidepo users

STRUCTURED EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JULY 1, 2017

EXAMINATION CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS ARRT BOARD APPROVED: JANUARY 2017 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JULY 1, 2017

DXA Best Practices. What is the problem? 9/29/2017. BMD Predicts Fracture Risk. Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: DXA

The Better Health News2

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

Prevalence of Osteoporosis p. 262 Consequences of Osteoporosis p. 263 Risk Factors for Osteoporosis p. 264 Attainment of Peak Bone Density p.

BONE HEALTH Dr. Tia Lillie. Exercise, Physical Activity and Osteoporosis

CASE 1 WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO TREAT? FACTS CONCERNS

New 2010 Osteoporosis Guidelines: What you and your health provider need to know QUESTIONS&ANSWERS

QCT BMD Imaging vs DEXA BMD Imaging

Osteoporosis: fragility fracture risk. Costing report. Implementing NICE guidance

Osteoporosis. Treatment of a Silently Developing Disease

Osteoporosis: Who, What, When, Why, and How

Dual-energy Vertebral Assessment

NICE SCOOP OF THE DAY FRAX with NOGG. Eugene McCloskey Professor of Adult Bone Diseases University of Sheffield

OSTEOPOROSIS IN INDONESIA

Disclosures. Diagnostic Challenges in Osteoporosis: Whom To Treat 9/25/2014

Bone Densitometry. Total 30 Maximum CE 14. DXA Scanning (10) 7

Submission to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence on

Audit on follow-up of patients with primary Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis: An Overview. Carolyn J. Crandall, MD, MS

Osteoporosis. Current Trend in Osteoporosis Management for Elderly in HK- Medical Perspective. Old Definition of Osteoporosis

Transcription:

Naresuan University Journal 2005; 13(3): 13-18 13 Bone Mineral Density and Its Associated Factors in Naresuan University Staff Supawitoo Sookpeng *, Patsuree Cheebsumon, Malinee Dhanarun, Thanyavee Pengpan and Prathan Wongtala Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand. Corresponding author. E-mail address: supawitoo_s@yahoo.com (S. Sookpeng) Received 4 May 2005; accepted 28 September 2005 Abstract It is important to calculate the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis to address the overall magnitude of the problem. This will allow us to predict the socioeconomic impact of these preventable chronic conditions. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and to assess the factors relating to osteoporosis in Naresuan University staff. A bone dentsitometer (Panasonic DXA-70) was used to measure the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the forearm in a hundred and thirty-three university staff members aged 21 to 60. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences in the mean BMD values among the different groups. BMD relations among variables were evaluated by linear regression analysis using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results revealed that the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis was 54.1% and 6.8%, respectively. The BMD was not significantly related to any factors. However, 42.3% of the osteopenia group consumed more than 3 cups of coffee per week, 38.5% did not exercise, and 48.1% sometimes drank soft drinks, but 90.4% and 61.5% were neither cigarette smokers nor alcohol drinkers respectively. In addition, there were 48.1% who drank milk or diary products more than 3 times per week. In the osteoporosis group, the results showed that 88.9% did not exercise, 66.7% consumed milk or diary products less than 3 times per week Furthermore, 77.8% sometimes consumed soft drinks. It can be concluded that the contributing factors related to osteopenia and osteoporosis are lack of exercise, insufficient consumption of milk or diary products and regular caffeine intake. Therefore, the university efforts should be placed on health promotion of an adequate supply of calcium and exercise to prevent osteopenia and osteoporosis. Keyword: Prevalence, Osteoporosis, Naresuan University staff Introduction Osteoporosis is one of the serious public health problems, especially in developing countries. Osteoporosis is usually found in post menopausal women, thin persons and persons with a family history of osteoporosis (Heany, 1983). The behavioral factors which are important in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis include physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption (Cumming et al., 1995). Bone fracture and pain are side effects of osteoporosis leading not only to a low quality of life but also to the high cost of treatment (Jensen et al., 1982). However, osteoporosis can be quickly identified by Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measurement (National Osteoporosis Foundation, 1987). Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) is the instrument used for the measurement of the BMD (Barnett and Nordin, 1960; Cameron and Sorensen, 1963; Cullum et al., 1989). DEXA has a very high degree of accuracy and is the popular precision instrument around the world in the assessment of the osteoporosis risk. The T-score obtained from the instrument is used for separating the three bone states _ normal, osteopenia and osteoporosis _ which is very useful, especially for the osteopenia group (Hansen and Hassager, 1990). The World Health Organization (WHO) defines osteoporosis as BMD that has a 2.5 standard deviation (SD) or more below the young adult mean value (T-score < -2.5), while individuals with BMD between 1 and 2.5 SD below average (T-score = -1 to -2.5) are said to have osteopenia (Kanis et al., 1994). The Department of Radiological Technology in the Faculty of Allied Health Sciences at Naresuan University carried out a project to measure the BMD of the university staff and gather some knowledge about the behavior that protects against osteoporosis. Furthermore, the results of the measurement were used to determine the prevalence and the contributing factors of osteopenia and osteoporosis in Naresuan University staff.

14 Naresuan University Journal 2005; 13(3) Materials and Methods The Naresuan University staff who participated in the project between 29-30 July 2004, which was the 14 th anniversary of the establishment of Naresuan University, were interviewed by well trained interviewers using structured questionnaires about behaviors related to osteoporosis such as smoking, exercise, and the consumption of alcohol, coffee, tea, soft drinks, and milk and diary products. After that, Bone Mineral Density (BMD) (g/cm 2 ) at the 1/10 distal site of the non-dominant forearm was measured using a bone densitometer (Panasonic model DXA-70). The coefficients of variation of the instrument were less than 1 %. A BMD of more than a 2.5 standard deviation below the mean value of the peak bone mass in young normal men and women was defined as osteoporosis while individuals with a BMD between 1 and 2.5 SD below average (T-score = -1 to -2.5) are said to have osteopenia (Kanis et al., 1994 ; WHO study group, 1994). The data were analyzed in four parts: i General data of the subjects. ii Behavior relating to osteoporosis: alcohol, coffee, tea, soft drinks, milk and diary product consumption, and cigarette smoking and exercise. iii The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis. iv The contributing factors relating to osteopenia and osteoporosis. The mean BMDs were presented in 10 year age groups. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to calculate the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis for the mean and standard deviation of the BMD classified by age groups (Cook and Campbell, 1979; Norusis,1985). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences in the mean BMD values among the different groups and the BMD relations among the variables was evaluated by linear regression analysis using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results and Discussion General data of the subjects One hundered and thirty-three university staff members participated in the project, Twenty-three were males (17.3%) and 110 were females (82.7%). Fifteen females were postmenopausal. The range of the sample age was from 21 to 60 years old. The mode of age was 21-30 years (48.1 %), and the average age of the sample was approximately 35 years. Behavior relating to osteoporosis As shown in Table 1, the results indicated that 94.0% (n=125) of the subjects were not cigarette smokers and 68.4% (n=91) were not alcohol drinkers. The behavior for coffee consumption showed that 47.4% (n=63) of the subjects usually drank coffee (more than three cups a week). However, 30.8% (n=41) did not drink coffee. In addition, 43.6% (n=58) did not drink tea, and 37.6% (n=50) drank less than three cups of tea a week. The behavior for soft drink consumption showed that 47.4% (n=63) of the subjects sometimes drank soft drinks (3 times per week or less) and 31.6% (n=42) did not drink soft drinks. The behavior for milk and diary product consumption showed that 47.4% (n=63) of the subjects usually consumed milk and diary products (more than three times a week), and 34.6% (n=46) consumed milk and diary products only sometimes. Moreover, data from questionnaires about exercise showed that 47.4% (n=63) of the subjects did not exercise. However, 23.3% (n=31) always exercised (more than 3 times per week) and the other 29.3% (n=39) exercised sometimes (3 times per week or less).

Naresuan University Journal 2005; 13(3) 15 Table 1 The percentage of subject in behavior relating to osteopenia and osteoporosis Percentage of subjects (n=133) Behavior Never Usually * Sometimes ** Used to Cigarette smoking 94.0 3.8-2.2 Exercise 47.4 23.3 29.3 - Alcohol consumption 68.4 3.0 27.8 0.8 Coffee consumption 30.8 47.4 21.1 0.8 Tea consumption 43.6 18.8 37.6 - Soft drink consumption 31.6 19.5 47.4 1.5 Milk and diary product consumption 18.0 47.4 34.6 - Note: * Usually = More than 3 times/cups per week ** Sometimes = 3 times/cups per week or less. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis The results of the BMD measurement showed that 39.1% of all subjects (n=52) who had a T-score higher than -1 SD or normal BMD where as 54.1% (n=72) had a T-score between -1 SD and -2.5 SD or osteopenia, and the remiaining 6.8% (n=9) had a T-score lower than -2.5 SD or osteoporosis. As shown in Table 2, considering the range of the subject ages, it was found that the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the subjects between 21 and 30 years of age was 62.5% and 4.7%, respectively. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the subjects aged between 31 and 40 years was 42.4% and 6.1%, respectively. Whereas, the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the subjects aged between 41 and 50 years and 51 and 60 years was 50.0 and 8.3%, and 50.0 and 16.7%, respectively. Table 2 The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis classify by age Age group (years) 21-30 (n=64) 31-40 (n=33) 41-50 (n=24) 51-60 (n=12) Normal 32.8 % 51.5 % 41.7 % 33.3 % Osteopenia 62.5 % 42.4 % 50.5 % 50.5 % Osteoporosis a 4.7 % 6.1 % 8.3 % 16.7 % Note: a P< 0.001 from t-test among different age groups However, the bone densitometer used in this study (Panasonic model DXA-70) was a peripheral BMD strategy. It was high sensitivity but might miss many individuals with osteoporosis. Therefore, it was used for a peripheral scanning method only. The contributing factors relating to osteopenia and osteoporosis From Table 3 and Table 4, the analysis of factors relating to osteopenia and osteoporosis showed that the BMD was not significantly related to any factor (smoking, exercise or alcohol, coffee, tea, soft drinks, milk and diary product consumption). However, for the osteopenia group, 42.3% consumed more than 3 cups of coffee per week over a long time (average about ten years or more), 38.5% did not take any exercise, and 48.1% sometimes drank soft drinks. However, 90.4% and 61.5% of the group were neither cigarette smokers nor alcohol drinkers, respectively. Moreover, 48.1% of the group usually consumed milk and diary products (more than three times a week) over a long time (average six years). The data from the osteoporosis group showed that 88.9% of the group did not take exercise, 66.7% consumed milk and diary products less than 3 times per week. Moreover, 77.8% of the subjects also sometimes drank soft drinks.

16 Naresuan University Journal 2005; 13(3) Table 3 The percentage of subject in behavior relating to osteopenia Percentage of subjects (n=133) Behavior Never Usually * Sometimes ** Used to Cigarette smoking 90.4 7.7-1.9 Exercise 38.5 32.7 28.8 - Alcohol consumption 61.5 3.8 34.6 - Coffee consumption 34.6 42.3 23.1 - Tea consumption 51.9 19.2 28.8 - Soft drink consumption 42.3 9.6 48.1 - Milk and diary product consumption 23.1 48.1 28.8 - Note: * Usually = More than 3 times/cups per week ** Sometimes = 3 times/cups per week or less. Note: Table 4 The percentage of subject in behavior relating to osteoporosis Percentage of subjects (n=133) Behavior Never Usually * Sometimes ** Used to Cigarette smoking 77.8 22.2 - - Exercise taking 88.9-11.1 - Alcohol consuming 55.6-33.3 11.1 Coffee consuming 44.4 33.3 22.2 - Tea consuming 44.4 33.3 22.2 - Soft drink consuming 11.1 11.1 77.8 - Milk and diary product consuming 11.1 22.2 66.7 - * Usually = More than 3 times/cups per week ** Sometimes = 3 times/cups per week or less. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in Naresuan University staff was 54.1% and 6.8%, respectively. It was notable that osteopenia was most prevalent in subjects between 21 and 30 years of age. Osteoporosis was most prevalent in the subjects between 51 and 60 years of age. A study conducted by Tungthitiwong and associates (Tungthitiwong et al., 2004), which determined the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in Bangkok among females between 41-50 years of age in 1996, reported that the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the Bangkok female population was 41.6% and 10.4%, respectively. Compared with our research, the prevalence of osteopenia in our subjects aged between 41 and 50 years was 50.0% which was more than the subjects in Tungthitiwong and associates's study and the prevalence of osteoporosis was 8.3% which was less. However, the two studies were conducted at different times and places with the subjects having different socio-demographic characteristics. An analysis of the contributing factors relating to osteopenia and osteoporosis showed that the BMD was not significantly related to any of the factors. However, the majority of subjects in both groups did not exercise. This finding was in accordance with the research on factors influencing BMD which reported that exercise played an important role in BMD. Persons who did not exercise always possessed low BMD (Pocock et al., 1986; Riggs and Melto, 1986). Moreover, our research found that the majority of subjects in the osteoporosis group consumed low amounts of milk and diary products, and the majority of both groups always drank coffee (a cup per day or more). Research has shown that coffee is a risk factor for osteoporosis whenever taken more than 4 cups a day (Albanese, 1977).

Naresuan University Journal 2005; 13(3) 17 Conclusion Data from measuring BMD and interviewing Naresuan University staff using a structured questionnaire between 29 and 30 July 2004 showed that 39.1% had normal BMD whereas 54.1% and 6.8% already showed osteopenia and osteoporosis, respectively. The highest prevalence of osteopenia was in the subjects between 21-30 years of age, and the highest prevalence of osteoporosis was in the subjects between 51-60 years of age. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the subjects between 21 and 30 years of age was 62.5 and 4.7%, respectively. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the subjects between 31 and 40 years of age was 42.4 and 6.1%, respectively. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the subjects between 41 and 50 years of age and 51 and 60 years of age were 50.0 and 8.3%, and 50.0 and 16.7%, respectively. The contributing factors relating to osteopenia were the frequent consumption of coffee and soft drinks, and lack of exercise. The contributing factors relating to osteoporosis were lack of exercise, inadequate intake of milk and diary products, and consumption of soft drinks. Determining the prevalence and contributing factors relating to osteopenia and osteoporosis is important for planning and laying out a policy for the prevention of osteopenia and osteoporosis. From this research, we conclude that half of the subjects, have osteopenia which may later develop into osteoporosis. So, the university should promote an adequate intake of calcium and exercise, and measure BMD once a year to prevent osteopenia and osteoporosis. Acknowledgement This research is a corporate effort of the Radiological Technology Department. We would like to express our thanks to the Faculty of Allied Health Sciences at Naresuan University for their support. In particular, we thank Assistant Professor Panada Techasupamorn for her help and advice. We also wish to mention Miss Pavinee Buthra for her invaluable help. Finally, we owe a great deal as always to the work of our students in data collection, and any credit due must be shared with them. References Albanese, A. A. (1977). Bone loss: causes, detection, and therapy. New York: Alan R. Liss. Barnett, E., & Nordin, B. E. C. (1960). The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 11, 166-174. Cameron, J. R., & Sorensen, J. (1963). Measurement of bone mineral (in vivo): an improve method. Science, 142, 230-236. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimental designed analysis for field setting. Chicago: Rand McNally. Cullum, C. D., Ell, P. J., & Ryder, J. P. (1989). X- ray dual absorptiometry: a new method for the measurement of BMD. British Journal of Radiology, 62, 1587-1592. Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., & Brower, W. S. (1995). Study of osteoporotic fractures research group: risk factor for hip fracture in white women. New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 767-773. Hansen, M. A., & Hassager, C. (1990). Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: A precise method of measuring BMD in L-spine. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 31, 1156-1162. Heany, R. P. (1983). Prevention of age-related osteoporosis in woman: in the osteoporotic syndrome. New York: LV Education. Jensen, G. F., Christiansen, C., & Transbol, L. B. (1982). Fracture frequency and bone preservation in postmenopausal women treated with estrogen. Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology, 60, 493-496.

18 Naresuan University Journal 2005; 13(3) Kanis, J. A., Melton, L. J., Christiansen, C., Johnston, C. C., & Khaltaev, N. (1994). The diagnosis of osteoporosis. Journal of Bone Mineral Research, 9, 1137-1141. National Osteoporosis Foundation. (1987). Physician's resource manual on osteoporosis: a decision-making guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Norusis, M. J. (1985). SPSS: Advance statistics guide. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pocock, N. A., Eisman, J. A., & Yeates, M. G. (1986). Physical fitness is a major determinant of femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 78, 618-621. Riggs, B. L., & Melto, L. J. (1986). Involution osteoporosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 1676-1686. Tungthitiwong, J., Kanjanomai, T., & Nicharat, M. (2004). Prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in thai women in bangkok. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from http://www.anamai.moph.go.th/ advisor/264/26408.html.