Focus on... Prostate Health Index (PHI) Proven To Outperform Traditional PSA Screening In Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Similar documents
Association of [ 2]proPSA with Biopsy Reclassification During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer

10/2/2018 OBJECTIVES PROSTATE HEALTH BACKGROUND THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX PHI*: BETTER PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION

Multicenter Evaluation of [ 2]Proprostate-Specific Antigen and the Prostate Health Index for Detecting Prostate Cancer

A pilot study evaluating serum pro-prostate-specific antigen in patients with rising PSA following radical prostatectomy

PSA and the Future. Axel Heidenreich, Department of Urology

Development and Internal Validation of a Prostate Health Index Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer at Extended Biopsy

PCa Commentary. Executive Summary: The "PCa risk increased directly with increasing phi values."

Evaluation of [ 2] propsa and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PSA Isoforms in Prostate Cancer Detection

#1 cancer. #2 killer. Boulder has higher rate of prostate cancer compared to other areas surrounding Rocky Flats

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Open Access

Although the test that measures total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been

Controversies in Prostate Cancer Screening

Contribution of prostate-specific antigen density in the prediction of prostate cancer: Does prostate volume matter?

Performance of the Prostate Health Index for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Southern African Population

MR-US Fusion Guided Biopsy: Is it fulfilling expectations?

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test

Screening and Risk Stratification of Men for Prostate Cancer Metastasis and Mortality

TRUS Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

Improving multivariable prostate cancer risk assessment using the Prostate Health Index

Complexed Prostate-specific Antigen for the Detection of Prostate Cancer

AVOID A POTENTIALLY UNNECESSARY REPEAT PROSTATE BIOPSY. The Progensa PCA3 test

Predicting Prostate Biopsy Outcome Using a PCA3-based Nomogram in a Polish Cohort

4Kscore. A Precision Test for Risk of Aggressive Prostate Cancer

Developing a new score system for patients with PSA ranging from 4 to 20 ng/ ml to improve the accuracy of PCa detection

The prostate health index PHI predicts oncological outcome and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy - analysis in 437 patients

DIAGNOSTICS ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME

BPH AND BEYOND. BPSA: A Novel Serum Marker for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Kevin M. Slawin, MD, Shahrokh Shariat, MD, Eduardo Canto, MD

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript World J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 February 1.

Faecal Calprotectin. Reliable Non-Invasive Discrimination Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) & Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)

Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines in 2017

MAKE REPEAT PROSTATE BIOPSY DECISIONS WITH CONFIDENCE. The Progensa PCA3 test

Pro PSA: a more cancer specific form of prostate specific antigen for the early detection of prostate cancer

Predictive role of free prostate specific antigen in a prospective active surveillance program (PRIAS)

PSA screening. To screen or not to screen, that s the question Walid Shahrour FRCSC, MDCM, BSc Assistant professor Northern Ontario School of Medicine

Use of the Percentage of Free Prostate-Specific Antigen to Enhance Differentiation of Prostate Cancer From Benign Prostatic Disease

Intermethod Differences in Results for Total PSA, Free PSA, and Percentage of Free PSA

Exploitation of Epigenetic Changes to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Prostate Biopsies

Diagnostics guidance Published: 3 June 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/dg17

Cancer. Description. Section: Surgery Effective Date: October 15, 2016 Subsection: Original Policy Date: September 9, 2011 Subject:

Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Thai Men with Prostate Cancer

National Prostate Cancer GP Referral Guideline

Health Screening Update: Prostate Cancer Zamip Patel, MD FSACOFP Convention August 1 st, 2015

The 4Kscore A Precision Test for Risk of Aggressive Prostate Cancer. Reduce Unnecessary Invasive Procedures And Healthcare Costs

What to Do with an Abnormal PSA Test. Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Fellow GU Lecture Series, Prostate Cancer. Asit Paul, MD, PhD 02/20/2018

Should A PSA threshold of 1.5 ng/ml be the threshold for further diagnostic tests?

Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Change Ratio at Initial Biopsy as a Novel Decision-Making Marker for Repeat Prostate Biopsy

Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of prostate volume in Sudanese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Objectives. Patients and Methods. Results

Comparative Assessment of Urinary Prostate Cancer

Use of early PSA velocity to predict eventual abnormal PSA values in men at risk for prostate cancer {

Research Article External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection

Objectives. Prostate Cancer Screening and Surgical Management

Sorveglianza Attiva update

Genetic and Protein Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Cancer Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer

Differentiation of lethal and non lethal prostate cancer: PSA and PSA isoforms and kinetics

or more transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided ng/ml and 39% if it was 20.0 ng/ml. of >10 ng/ml have prostate cancer [3], many other

Prostate Cancer. David Wilkinson MD Gulfshore Urology

MP Genetic and Protein Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Cancer Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer

Diagnosis and management of prostate cancer in the

ADVICE TO PATIENTS REQUESTING PSA MEASUREMENT

Questions and Answers About the Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test

Towards Early and More Specific Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer? Beyond PSA: New Biomarkers Ready for Prime Time

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Section Editors Robert H Fletcher, MD, MSc Michael P O'Leary, MD, MPH

Questions and Answers about Prostate Cancer Screening with the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 58 (2010)

NEURO-FUZZY SYSTEM FOR PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS LUIGI BENECCHI

Clinical performance of serum isoform p2psa, %p2psa and prostate health index in men younger than 60 years: results from a multicentric european study

ONCOLOGY LETTERS 8: , 2014

Pathology Consultation on Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing

Predictive Performance Evaluation

OBJECTIVE. significantly different classification rates of patients. These differences were even larger when using fixed %fpsa thresholds.

Genetic and Protein Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Cancer Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer

Should I get screened for prostate cancer? What you should know about the PSA test

Elevated PSA. Dr.Nesaretnam Barr Kumarakulasinghe Associate Consultant Medical Oncology National University Cancer Institute, Singapore 9 th July 2017

Understanding the risk of recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer. Aditya Bagrodia, MD

Clinical Utility of the PCA3 Urine Assay in European Men Scheduled for Repeat Biopsy

Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of Novel Tests in the Screening and Diagnostic Phases of Prostate Cancer Compared to Current Practice

The Who s of Genomic Markers: Whom to Biopsy?

Nomogram using transrectal ultrasound-derived information predicting the detection of high grade prostate cancer on initial biopsy

MDxHealth. Acceleration of payor coverage ConfirmMDx. Research Note.

Determination of An Optimum Cut-off Point for % fpsa/tpsa to Improve Detection of Prostate Cancer

How to detect and investigate Prostate Cancer before TRT

MP Genetic and Protein Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Cancer Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer

Supplemental Information

Preoperative Gleason score, percent of positive prostate biopsies and PSA in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

PSA and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of Investigative Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer

Cumulative Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment with the Aid of the Free-to-Total Prostate Specific Antigen Ratio

4/20/2015. Serum Protein Tumor Marker Assays: A Need for Constant Vigilance. Learning Objectives. Estimated Cancer Deaths in the US in 2015

Financial Disclosures. Prostate Cancer Screening and Surgical Management

MRI in the Enhanced Detection of Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know

Prostate MRI Hamidreza Abdi, MD,FEBU Post Doctoral Fellow Vancouver Prostate Centre UBC Department of Urologic Sciences May-20144

Outline. Introduction An integrated approach for biomarker discovery, validation and translation Johns Hopkins Clinical Chemistry Division.

FOR PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH EARLY-STAGE PROSTATE CANCER. Discover a test that can help you on your treatment journey

PROSTATE MRI. Dr. Margaret Gallegos Radiologist Santa Fe Imaging

Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Transcription:

Focus on... Prostate Health Index (PHI) Proven To Outperform Traditional PSA Screening In Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer in Ireland & Worldwide In Ireland, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed invasive cancer in men.* Over 3,300 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer each year in Ireland.** In 2012, incidence of prostate cancer in Ireland was 4th highest of 27 European countries.** Prostate cancer comprises almost one third of all invasive cancers in Irish men (30.3%).* The cancer incidence rate in Irish males was 10% higher than the EU average, partly due to increased diagnosis of prostate cancer in Ireland (52% higher).* * Source: Cancer in Ireland 1994-2014: Annual Report of the National Cancer Registry. ** Source: Cancer in Ireland 2013: Annual Report of the National Cancer Registry

Introduction Traditional markers for Prostate cancer (Pca), such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free prostate-specific antigen (fpsa) lack diagnostic specificity. Thus, definitive diagnosis is still based on invasive prostate biopsies which are associated with patient discomfort, anxiety, and financial costs. Add to this complications which occur frequently and there is a real need for a more specific Pca marker to reduce unnecessary biopsies. PHI (Prostate Health Index) The Prostate Health Index (PHI) is a mathematical formula that combines total PSA, free PSA and a new serum marker known as [-2] propsa (p2psa) into a single score that can be used to aid in clinical decision-making, and is estimated to be 3 times more specific in detecting prostate cancer in patients than PSA screening alone. 1 p2psa is strongly expressed in the peripheral zone of cancerous tissues of the prostate and is rarely expressed in the transition zone, which is the main site of most benign prostatic hyperplasia. It is therefore a more specific marker for prostate cancer than PSA. PHI Proven to Outperform Traditional PSA Screening in Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer In 2011, Catalona et al published the results of a large multicentre trial of PHI for prostate cancer detection in 892 men with total PSA levels from 2 to 10ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination (DRE) who were undergoing prostate biopsy. The mean PHI scores were 34 and 49 for men with negative and positive biopsies, respectively. Setting the sensitivity at 80-95%, the results of the study showed:

- PHI had greater specificity for distinguishing PCa on biopsy compared with PSA or percentage free PSA (%fpsa). - On receiver operating characteristic analysis, PHI had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70, compared with 0.65 for %fpsa and 0.53 for PSA. - An increasing PHI was associated with a 4.7-fold increased risk of prostate cancer and a 1.61-fold increased risk of Gleason score greater than or equal to 4+3=7 disease on biopsy. 1 Several large international studies have also reported on PHI, including the PRO-PSA Multicentric European Study. Lazzeri and colleagues showed that using p2psa or PHI significantly improved the prediction of biopsy outcome over total and free PSA. The use of %p2psa or PHI would reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies by 15% at 90% sensitivity and PHI would miss the fewest high grade tumours. 3 Clinical Utility 1. PHI improves the detection of prostate cancer & reduces the occurrence of unnecessary biopsies The higher the PHI, the greater the risk of having prostate cancer. 100 Positive biopsies (%) 80 60 40 20 20 35 48 62 76 79 0 phi <30 n=275 30-39 n=303 40-49 n=247 50-59 n=175 60-79 n=193 80 n=169 Stephan et al, Clinical Chem Acta, 2013

The PHI is of particular interest within two clinical scenarios: Total PSA values of <4ng/mL in patients with a negative digital rectal examination result: The PHI can be the only raised marker and is raised several months before the diagnosis of prostate cancer is made. Intermediate values of between 4 and 10ng/ ml, found during the course of a benign pathology falsely positive PSA results can also benefit from the PHI. It can help to decide whether to take a prostate biopsy or not and leads to a significant decrease in unnecessary invasive procedures. 2. Correlation Between PHI & Gleason Score A significant correlation has also been noted between PHI and Gleason Score. Sanda et al showed that not only did PHI outperform free and total PSA for prostate cancer detection, but it also improved the prediction of high-grade and clinically-significant prostate cancer. 4 In 658 men with PSA levels of 4 to 10 ng/ml the multicentre study population showed a significant relationship between PHI and the Gleason score on prostate biopsy. PHI had a higher AUC (0.698) compared with %fpsa (0.654), p2psa (0.550) and PSA (0.549) for clinically significant prostate cancer based on the Epstein criteria. Furthermore, a quarter of the study population had PHI levels <27, and only a single patient in this PHI range had a biopsy Gleason score 4+3=7. 3. Cost Effectiveness of p2psa and PHI Owing to its high accuracy in predicting PCa, PHI could result in the avoidance of a considerable number of negative prostate biopsies, thus reducing direct costs. Studies such as Nichol et al evaluated the costeffectiveness of PHI in a hypothetical health plan with 100.000 male members aged 50 to 75 years old.

Using PHI in addition to PSA cut-off values of 2ng/ ml for recommending a prostate biopsy was estimated to save $356,647 over a 12 month period. 5 4. PHI and PCA3 The significance of PHI, PCA3 and their combination is currently the subject of numerous studies. Certain studies suggest that PHI has a better performance with regards to making the decision to take an initial biopsy, and PCA3 for subsequent biopsies. One must be rigorous with the use of these study results, which have been obtained in well-defined populations (clinical, initial biopsy or subsequent biopsies, total PSA, family history of the disease etc.), and sometimes with multi-parameter analyses. 5. p2psa and PHI in active surveillance programmes Studies have shown that baseline p2psa and derivative values can help identify those men at risk of future unfavourable reclassification during AS programmes. 6,7 A study conducted by Makarov et al showed the ratio of PHI was significantly greater (37.23 ±15.76 vs 30.60 ±12.28; P=.03) in men who ultimately had unfavourable biopsy findings. 6 References 1. Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Sanda MG, et al. A multicenter study of [-2]proprostate- specific antigen combined with prostate-specific antigen and free prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate-specific antigen range. J Urology 2011 May;185:1650-55.2 2. Mikolajczyk SD, Millar LS, Wang TJ, Rittenhouse HG, Marks LS, Song W, et al. A precursor form of prostate-specific antigen is more highly elevated in prostate cancer compared with benign transition zone prostate tissue. Cancer Res. 2000;60:756 759 3. Lazzeri M, et al. Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol. 2013;63(6):986-94 4. Sanda M., Wei J., Broyles D., Shin S., Partin A., Klee G., et al. (2013) Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) for improving prostate cancer detection and identification of clinically significant prostate cancer in the 4 to 10 ng/ml PSA range. In: Proceedings of American Urological Association Annual Meeting, San Diego 5. Nichol MB, Wu J, An JJ, Huang J, Denham D, Frencher S, et al. Budget impact analysis of a new prostate cancer risk index for prostate cancer detection. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2011;14:253 261. 6. Isharwal S, Makarov DV, Sokoll LJ, Landis P, Marlow C, Epstein JI, et al. ProPSA and diagnostic biopsy tissue DNA content combination improves accuracy to predict need for prostate cancer treatment among men enrolled in an active surveillance program. Urology. 2011;77:763.e1 763.e6. 7. Tosoian JJ, Loeb S, Feng Z, Isharwal S, Landis P, Elliot DJ, et al. Association of [-2]proPSA with biopsy reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188: 1131 1136.

Key information [-2]proPSA New serum marker Almost exclusively expressed by cancerous prostate cells (unlike total PSA) Can be measured from a simple blood sample (unlike PCA3) PHI (Prostate Health Index) An index calculated from the serum concentration of [-2]proPSA, combined with total PSA and free PSA Increase the performance of [-2]proPSA in detecting prostate cancer PHI has a greater specificity for detecting PCa compared with PSA or %fpsa Clinical interest of PHI In patients with a serum level of total PSA between 2 and 10 ng/ml (Hybritech Standard) To non-invasively identify patients who are highly likely to present with a positive prostate biopsy result To detect potentially aggressive cancers (significant correlation between PHI/Gleason) Potential use in monitoring of patients. Result in avoidance of negative prostate biopsies, thus saving time and reducing direct costs.

In practice [-2]proPSA and PHI calculation Sample 1 ml of frozen serum Important: the serum sample must be separated from cells within 3 hours from sample collection. The sample must be collected no sooner than 72 hours after prostate manipulation such as the digital rectal examination, prostate massage or a transrectal ultrasound. Interpretation In patients with a serum level of total PSA between 2 and 10 ng/ml (Hybritech Standard). PHI* index values (Hybritech calibration) Probability of cancer (at 95% specificity) 0 21 8,4% (1,9 16,1 %) 2 1 40 21,0% (17,3 24,6 %) > 40 44,0% (36,0 52,9 %) * Calculation includes the simultaneous assaying of [-2] propsa, free PSA and total PSA (Technique HYBRITECH Beckman Coulter). Total or free PSA results generated by other methods or at other times cannot be used in the calculation. Contact details Eurofins Biomnis Three Rock Road Sandyford Business Estate Sandyford Dublin 18 Ireland Tel: +353 1 295 8545 Fax: +353 1 295 8550 sales@eurofins-biomnis.ie www.eurofins-biomnis.ie