Clinical Application of Modified Apically Repositioned Flap in Class III/IV Gingival Recession Cases

Similar documents
International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

TWO-STEP SURGICAL PROCEDURE FOR ROOT COVERAGE (FREE GINGIVAL GRAFT AND CORONALLY POSITIONED FLAP) - A CASE REPORT

Rehabilitating a Compromised Site for Restoring Form, Function and Esthetics- A Case Report

Management of miller class II gingival recession by laterally positioned pedicle flap revised technique

Surgical Therapy. Tuesday, April 2, 13. Alessan"o Geminiani, DDS, MS

Gum Graft? Patient Need a. Does My. 66 JANUARY 2017 // dentaltown.com. by Dr. Brian S. Gurinsky

SUBEPITHELIAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT A PREDICTABLE INDICATOR FOR ROOT COVERAGE

Case Report Esthetic Root Coverage with Double Papillary Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: A Case Report

Free Gingival Graft as a Single Step Procedure for Treatment of Mandibular Miller Class I and II Recession Defects

MUCOGINGIVAL THERAPY PERIODONTAL PLASTIC SURGERY

Management of millers class III marginal tissue recession associated with endodontic lesion: Report of two cases managed using second stage surgery

CITRIC ACID ROOT BIOMODIFICATION IN RECESSION COVERAGE WITH LATERAL PEDICLE FLAP TECHNIQUE- A CASE REPORT

Efficacy of Lateral Pedicle Graft in the Treatment of Isolated Gingival Recession Defects

ELIMINATE POCKETS. Periodontal pocket is the consequence of periodontal infection But also a major risk factor for the further progression of disease

Many techniques have been proposed for root coverage:

Townie Guest Editorial. Gingival Attachment Loss: Evaluation and Surgical Options. Daniel J. Melker, DDS. fig. 1

Double Papillary Flap - A Treatment for Gingival Recession

Class II Furcations Treated by Guided Tissue Regeneration in Humans: Case Reports

A Fantastic Aprroach for Multiple Recession Coverage: Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access Technique (Vista)-A Case Report

Delta Dental of Virginia Clinical Policy # 402

Free Gingival Autograft: A Case Report

FRENECTOMY WITH LATERALLY DISPLACED FLAP: A CASE REPORT

The Treatment of Gingival Recession Associated with Deep Corono-Radicular Abrasions (CEJ step) a Case Series

Surgical Procedure in Guided Tissue Regeneration with the. Inion GTR Biodegradable Membrane System

Esthetic Crown Lengthening

A 2-Year Follow-Up of Root Coverage Using Subpedicle Acellular Dermal Matrix Allografts and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Autografts

Avita Rath, 1 Smrithi Varma, 2 and Renny Paul Case Presentation. 1. Background

Rescuing Tooth with Regenerative Technique: A Case Report. Women,, Suraram Mainroad, Ghmc Quthbullapur, Hyderabad , Telangana.

Over the years, mucogingival surgery

ijcrr Vol 04 issue 12 Category: Case Report Received on:22/04/12 Revised on:07/05/12 Accepted on:22/05/12

CLINICAL. Free gingival grafts to manage recession when and how? Matthew B M Thomas CLINICAL

GINGIVAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES

Principles of Periodontal flap surgery. Dr.maryam khosravi

Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozepur, Punjab, India

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF WHAT WE DO? TEAM PERIODONTICS: WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE PATIENT CARE YOU ARE THE PERIODONTISTS IN YOUR PRACTICE!

Contemporary Periodontal Surgery

The Use of DynaMatrix Extracellular Membrane for Gingival Augmentation: A Case Series Dr. Stephen Saroff, DDS

A Clinical Evaluation of Anatomic Features of Gingiva in Dental Students in Tabriz, Iran

Classifications for Gingival Recession: A Mini Review

CASE REPORT. Localised Ridge Augmentation Using Onlay Graft : A Case Report. Ridge Augmentation : A Case Report

Pouch and tunnel technique: Minimally invasive periodontal plastic surgery for root coverage

Esthetic Crown Lengthening for Upper Anterior Teeth: Indications and Surgical Techniques

All Dentistry is Cosmetic Betsy Bakeman, DDS Arkansas State Dental Association

Periosteal fenestration: A single stage surgical procedure for root coverage along with vestibular deepening

Alarge number of sound clinical

PERIODONTAL CASE PRESENTATION - 1

Esthetic Crown Lengthening for Upper Anterior Teeth: Indications and Surgical Techniques

MODIFIED SINGLE ROLL FLAP APPROACH FOR SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT AND GINGIVAL AUGMENTATION

Connective Tissue Graft for Gingival Recession in Mandibular Incisor Area: A Case Report

Osseous surgery in periodontal treatment

Advanced Probing Techniques

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GINGIVAL RECESSION WITH SOFT TISSUE GRAFT PROCEDURE

botiss dental bone & tissue regeneration biomaterials mucoderm 3D-Regenerative Tissue Graft strictly biologic

Innovative Periodontal Surgery by Monocortical Corticotomy in Management of Bimaxillary Protrusion Cases: A Clinical Study

Treatment of multiple gingival recessions using subepithelial connective tissue grafting with a single-incision technique

Prevalence of Gingival recession in Dental college students: A Clinical investigation

Case Report. RapidSorb Rapid Resorbable Fixation System. Ridge augmentation in a one-step surgical protocol.

Over the years, mucogingival surgery

Surgical reconstruction of lost papilla around implant with a modified technique: A case report

Treatment of dental recessions in the esthetic zone by gingival and osseous recontouring. A multidisciplinary perio-prosthodontic case report.

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry

REGENERATIONTIME. A Case Report by. Geistlich Mucograft for the treatment of multiple adjacent recession defects: A more palatable option

14/09/15. Assessment of Periodontal Disease. Outline. Why is Periodontal assessment needed? The Basics of Periodontal assessment

Single step root coverage with modified bridge flap technique: A pilot study

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

A New Papilla Preservation Technique for Periodontal Regeneration of Severely Compromised Teeth. Jose A. Moreno Rodríguez and Raúl G.

Case Report Esthetic Rehabilitation of a Severely Compromised Anterior Area: Combined Periodontal and Restorative Approach

Gingival Unit Graft Versus Free Gingival Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recession: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial


Minimally invasive techniques for periodontal regeneration

Case Series. BK Somnath, Pretti Charde, ML Bhongade

Replacement of a congenitally missing lateral incisor in the maxillary anterior aesthetic zone using a narrow diameter implant: A case report

Practical Advanced Periodontal Surgery

Principles of endodontic surgery

CASE REPORT MANAGEMENT OF MILLER S CLASS III GINGIVAL RECESSION USING FREE CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFTS - THE USE OF TWO DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES

Gingival recession causes periodontal

Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using a Two-step Approach with Different Soft Tissue Grafts: A Clinical Report

RESEARCH REVIEW. Gingival recession: a proposal for a new classification ISSN :

Gingival Recession and Various Root Coverage Procedures: A Review

Dental Research Journal

Vertical and/or horizontal alveolar

Core build-up using post systems

Nonextraction Treatment of Class I Malocclusion having Anterior Crowding and Multiple Canine Impactions

AETIOLOGY AND SEVERITY OF GINGIVAL RECESSION AMONG YOUNG INDIVIDUALS IN BELGAUM DISTRICT IN INDIA

COMBINED PERIODONTAL-ENDODONTIC LESION. By Dr. P.K. Agrawal Sr. Prof and Head Dept. Of Periodontia Govt. Dental College, Jaipur

A mucogingival technique for the treatment of multiple recession defects in the

Michael K. McGuire* and Martha Nunn

Immediate Implant Placement Along With Guided Bone Regeneration In Mandibular Anterior Region A Case Report.

Clinical Management of an Unusual Case of Gingival Enlargement

Biologic width: Understanding and its preservation Malathi K 1, Singh A 2

DENTAL EXTRACTIONS MADE EASIER. Brook A. Niemiec, DVM

Puneet Mehta et al. /JPR:BioMedRx: An International Journal 2013,1(7), Available online through

Patient Satisfaction With Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft In The Treatment Of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects - A Clinical Study

Pouch Roll Technique for Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Variation of the Modified Roll Technique

Tina M. Beck, DDS, MS

This document addresses Anthem s clinical policy for mucogingival surgery and soft tissue grafting.

Consensus Report Tissue augmentation and esthetics (Working Group 3)

THE PERIODONTAL ASPECT OF IMPLANT THERAPY Prof. Dr. Windisch Péter

Transcription:

J Harjeet Singh et al SE REPORT 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1200 linical pplication of Modified pically Repositioned Flap in lass III/IV Gingival Recession ases 1 Harjeet Singh, 2 Manab Kosala, 3 Vivek apurao Mandlik STRT im: Mucogingival conditions may be detected during a comprehensive or problem-focused periodontal examination. The aim of periodontal therapy is to help maintain the dentition or its replacements in health with good function and esthetics, and may include restoring anatomic form and function. further goal is to reduce the risk of progressive recession. mong the procedures, root coverage has attracted the most interest. predictable gain can be achieved in class I or II recession cases, but prognosis tends to be poor for class III and IV. The purpose of this case series was to clinically evaluate the efficacy of modified apically repositioned flap in increasing the dimensions of the keratinized tissue in apical direction in class III or IV gingival recession. Materials and methods: total of seven systemically healthy patients with class III or IV recession involving one or more teeth in mandibular anterior region were selected for the study. Primary parameters assessed were width of keratinized gingiva and pocket depth. Results: The mean apicocoronal gain in the keratinized tissue at 6 months was 2.14 mm with mean baseline value of 1.43 mm and 6 months value at 3.57 mm. The clinical gain was statistically significant with p-value <0.05. onclusion: Modified apically displaced flap offers an easy and predictable approach for increasing the width of keratinized tissue. Keywords: ttached gingival, Gingival recession, Labial frenum. How to cite this article: Singh H, Kosala M, Mandlik V. linical pplication of Modified pically Repositioned Flap in lass III/IV Gingival Recession ases. J ontemp ent 2017;7(2):130-134. Source of support: Nil onflict of interest: None 1 Graded Specialist, 2 Reader and Instructor, 3 lassified Specialist 1 epartment of Periodontics, Naval Institute of ental Sciences Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 2 epartment of ental Surgery and Oral Health Sciences, rmed Forces Medical ollege, Pune, Maharashtra, India 3 epartment of Periodontics, ommand Military ental entre (S), Pune, Maharashtra, India orresponding uthor: Harjeet Singh, Graded Specialist epartment of Periodontics, Naval Institute of ental Sciences Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, Phone: +919869857648, e-mail: harjeet_pg@yahoo.co.in 130 INTROUTION Mucogingival conditions are deviations from the normal anatomic relationship between gingival margin and mucogingival junction (MGJ). ommon mucogingival conditions are recession, reduced or absent keratinized tissue, and probing depth beyond the MGJ. natomical variations that may complicate the management of these conditions include tooth position, frenulum insertions, and vestibular depth. 1 Mucogingival conditions may be detected during a comprehensive or problem-focused periodontal examination. Problem-focused examination for mucogingival condition would involve medical examination, dental examination, intraoral findings, such as probing and visual examination, etiological factors, and radiographic examination. The aim of periodontal therapy is to help maintain the dentition or its replacements in health with good function and esthetics, and may include restoring anatomic form and function. further goal is to reduce the risk of progressive recession. mong the procedures, root coverage has attracted the most interest. predictable gain can be achieved in class I or II recession cases, but prognosis tends to be poor for class III and IV. 2 lass III and IV gingival recessions are complex cases with reduced width of keratinized tissue, interdental tissue loss, and frenulum involvement. dequate width of attached gingiva is necessary to protect the periodontium and promote periodontal health. arnio et al 3 described a variation of modified apical repositioned flap (MRF) for augmenting the dimensions of attached gingiva on multiple adjacent teeth without recession and interdental tissue loss. The purpose of this case series was to clinically evaluate the efficacy of MRF in increasing the dimensions of the keratinized tissue in apical direction in class III or IV gingival recessions. MTERILS N METHOS ll the study subjects were informed about the treatment options for the area presenting with mucogingival problem. Patients selected to undergo the surgical procedure gave informed consent. total of seven systemically healthy patients (four females and three males) were selected for the study. The treatment area in all the cases was mandibular anterior region with class III or IV recession involving

J linical pplication of Modified pically Repositioned Flap one or more teeth. The age of patients varied from 31 to 42 years (average age of 35.5 years). The common complaint among all patients was their inability to clean the region, bleeding from gums, and increasing space between teeth. ll the patients underwent phase I therapy, and were reviewed biweekly for 8 weeks. carefully planned home care oral hygiene protocol was explained to the patients. This included use of interdental brush twice daily. aseline recording included width of keratinized gingiva, pocket depth, tension test, and bleeding from probing. 4 Inclusion criteria included 0.5 to 2 mm of keratinized gingiva, physiological sulcus depth, and gingival tissue free of inflammation. The surgical procedure was done under 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000). partial thickness horizontal beveled incision was made using a No. 15 P blade 0.5 mm coronal to MGJ into the keratinized tissue. partial thickness flap was raised apical to the initial incision extending at least one tooth on either side of defect region (Fig. 1). The lateral extension of the incision allowed for apical repositioning of the flap without the use of vertical release incisions. The coronal end of partial thickness flap was lined by 0.5 mm of keratinized tissue. The gingiva coronal to the initial incision remained intact around the teeth. t the base of the flap, a full-thickness incision was placed to release the flap from the muscular fibers and allow for maximum apical displacement. The flap was moved apically and secured to the periosteum with horizontal mattress sutures using 5-0 bioabsorbable suture material (Fig. 2). The surgical site was inspected for any loose tissue or frenal fibers. thin and homogenous layer of periosteum with no movable tissue was considered the end point of the surgery. Postoperative instructions included use of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash 10 ml twice daily for 4 postoperative weeks and use of analgesics (ibuprofen, 400 mg) as needed. Patients were advised not to retract the lip and rinse gently. Mechanical oral hygiene aids were avoided for 4 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS Pre- and postoperative measurements were recorded and statistically analyzed. ll parameters were averaged and all tests were performed at the 5% significance level. p-value 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The mean apicocoronal gain in the keratinized tissue at 6 months was 2.14 mm with mean baseline value of Figs 1 to : () Initial horizontal beveled incision placed in the keratinized gingival tissue; () apical displacement of partial thickness flap; () preoperative class IV gingival recession with secondary involvement of frenum in 31 to 41 region; () postoperative 9 months follow-up Journal of ontemporary entistry, May-ugust 2017;7(2):130-134 131

Harjeet Singh et al Figs 2 to : Healing of surgical site: () immediate postoperative; () 72 hours postoperative; () 1 week postoperative; and () 1 month postoperative Table 1: omparison of primary outcome variables at baseline and 6 months Mean S p-value Keratinized gingiva aseline 1.43 0.53 < 0.05 6 months 3.57 0.53 Pocket depth aseline 1.57 1.28 > 0.05 6 months 0.53 0.48 S: Standard deviation 1.43 mm and 6 months value at 3.57 mm. The clinical gain was statistically significant with p-value <0.05. No statistically significant difference in probing depth was detected pre- and postoperatively (Table 1). Tension test was positive for all the cases at the baseline recording, and negative at 6 months follow-up. Sulcus bleeding index was used to assess the gingival bleeding in the lower anterior region. verage baseline score recorded at the end of phase I therapy was 3 and at 6 months, the score was 1. ISUSSION variety of techniques, such as pedicle grafts, free gingival autografts, connective tissue grafts, guided tissue regeneration, etc., have been used for the treatment of 132 gingival recession. 5 ll these procedures have limited value in management of class III/IV gingival recession. In this study, MRF constituted an efficient and predictable modality of therapy to increase the apicocoronal dimensions of keratinized gingiva in class III/IV cases. The surgical procedure involves minimum morbidity and is cost-effective. The goal of therapy was to achieve more functional efficiency rather than cosmetic gain. The surgical site shows uneventful healing as it is covered with periosteum. Postoperative inspection revealed granulation tissue at 72 hours and ingrowths of epithelium from margin of wound. None of the patients required analgesic from second postoperative day. t 4 week postoperatively, the surgical site was covered with tissue similar to adjacent tissue (Fig. 2). Three of the cases showed a fibrotic line demarcating the keratinized tissue from movable vestibular mucosa (Fig. 3). The controversy in the literature regarding the necessity of a band of attached gingiva for maintenance of optimal periodontal health remains unresolved. While Lang and Löe 6 suggested that 2 mm of gingiva is an essential prerequisite for periodontal health, Miyasato et al 7 demonstrated that, with proper oral hygiene and absence of bacterial plaque, clinically

J linical pplication of Modified pically Repositioned Flap Figs 3 to : ( and ) Pre- and postoperative case 2; ( and ) pre- and postoperative case 3 healthy gingiva can exist in areas with minimal or no attached gingiva. The average gain in the keratinized tissue in this case series was more than 2 mm, which is of clinical significance when assessed along with the gingival bleeding score. The cases selected in this case series underwent phase I therapy and were on homecare protocol, but on follow-up showed persistent gingival inflammation in the affected sites (sulcus bleeding score of 3). The sulcus bleeding score of 1 at 6-month followup shows clinically significant improvement in the periodontal health. No clinical changes were observed in the gingival recession and pocket depth at baseline and 6 months follow-up. Presence of anatomical factors, such as aberrant frenum, muscle attachment, and gingival phenotype is also thought to contribute to the etiology of gingival recession. 2 ll the cases had aberrant frenulum, with positive tension test prior to surgery. dequate care was taken to displace the frenum and muscle attachment apically to prevent postsurgical relapse. t 6 months, no aberrant frenulum attachments were noticed, resulting in negative tension test and improved periodontal health. full-thickness incision at the base of the flap released all the muscular attachments. The flap was sutured to periosteum below this incision, forming a boundary for surgical wound lined with keratinized epithelium all around. s studied by Karring et al, 8 the main determining factor of the nature of the new tissue that develops over the exposed periosteum rests with the origin of granulation tissue cells that migrate over the wound. The surgical wound created by MRF is surrounded with keratinized tissue. This prevents nonkeratinized cells from oral mucosa proliferating onto the surgical area. The partial thickness incision prevents the exposure of crestal bone and hence, prevents bone loss. The major limitation of the study is the small sample size and absence of control. large-scale study with nonsurgical periodontal therapy forming the control is proposed at this center. ONLUSION The predictable increase in the apicocoronal gingival dimensions with MRF offers considerable advantage over other mucogingival therapies. The procedure has minimum morbidity with no requirement for soft tissue graft, is cost-effective when compared with guided tissue regeneration or alloderm, and has predictable color match to the adjacent tissue. Furthermore, the procedure is Journal of ontemporary entistry, May-ugust 2017;7(2):130-134 133

Harjeet Singh et al simple and can be conducted expeditiously with limited chair time for operator and patient. second-stage coronal advancement in these cases may be attempted for root coverage. REFERENES 1. llen EP. Use of mucogingival surgical procedures to enhance esthetics. ent lin North m 1988 pr;32(2):307-330. 2. ouchard P, Malet J, orghetti. ecision-making in aesthetics: root coverage revisited. Periodontology 2000 2001 Oct;27(1):97-120. 3. arnio J, amargo PM, Passanezi E. Increasing the apicocoronal dimensiwon of attached gingiva using the modified apically repositioned flap technique: a case series with a 6 month follow up. J Periodontol 2007 Sep;78(9):1825-1830. 4. Hazen SP. Indices for the measurement of gingival inflammation in the clinical studies of oral hygiene and periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res 1974 ec;9(suppl 14):61-77. 5. Langer, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985 ec;56(12): 715-720. 6. Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol 1992 Oct;43(10):623-627. 7. Miyasato M, rigger M, Egelberg J. Gingival condition in areas of minimal and appreciable width of keratinized gingival. J lin Periodontol 1977 ug;4(3):200-209. 8. Karring T, umming R, Oliver R, Löe H. The origin of granulation tissue and its impact on postoperative results of mucogingival surgery. J Periodontol 1975 Oct;46(10): 577-585. 134