Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

Similar documents
Novel concept for drug delivery in infrapopliteal arteries The LIMBO trial

New approaches for drug delivery in BTK arteries

Adventitial Drug Infusion to Prevent Restenosis

Adventitial Drug Therapy Below-the-Knee: Update on LIMBO and TANGO

The LIMBO trial: a RCT investigating adventitial dexamethasone infusion to prevent restenosis in BTK arteries utilizing a novel angiographic endpoint

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

Adventitial Drug Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia

Alternative methods of drug delivery in BTK vessels Initial insights from the TANGO trial

The TANGO Trial: A phase II below-the-knee study investigating the adventitial micro-infusion of Temsirolimus after PTA or atherectomy

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

The DANCE Trial 12 month results

Long-term results with interwoven nitinol stents vs. BMS vs. DCB

Real PTX RCT: 3 year data from a randomized comparison of DCB vs. DES in femoropopliteal lesions

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

Rotarex mechanical debulking: The Leipzig experience in patients

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg, MD, FESC Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Dierk Scheinert, M.D. Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR

The Illumina FIH study with a next generation DES 12-months results

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

LIFESTREAM TM First look at the BOLSTER 2-year follow up data

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Contemporary use of DCBs, Ranger clinical trial and investigator sponsored research

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

Rotarex mechanical thrombectomythe first line option for thrombotic occlusions?

Study of a Balloon-Expandable Covered Stent for Obstructive Lesions in the Iliac Artery

PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS

William A. Gray MD System Chief of Cardiovascular Services, Main Line Health President, Lankenau Heart Institute Wynnewood, PA USA

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Disclosure. I do not have any potential conflict of interest

LUTONIX DCB in BTK Update on the BTK clinical program & single center experience

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Endovascular Innovations Today and Tomorrow. Zaheed Tai, DO, FACC, FSCAI Winter Haven Hospital Heart of Florida

January 23, Vascular and oncological interventional radiology Paris Descartes University

Clinical use and safety of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of BTK: interim data from a prospective registry

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

Update on the OPTIMIZE BTK Trial. Marianne Brodmann, MD Division of Angiology Medical University Graz, Austria

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Vessel Preparation Prior to DCB and Stenting: How to Do It.

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

Update on the role of drug eluting balloons

The DANCE Trial. Disclosure. DANCE Trial Organization. DANCE: Dexamethasone delivered to the Adventitia to enhance Clinical Efficacy

Vessel Preparation: What does it mean and what are the current tools? Lawrence Garcia, MD St. Elizabeth s Medical Center Boston, MA, USA

Atherectomy: Jetstream and Directional. George S. Chrysant, M.D.

CLI Treatment Using Long and Scoring Balloons

Disclosures. In the DCB Era, How Do I Choose To Use a Stent? When to Stent and What Devices to Use in the SFA

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

Disclosures. Rational Selection of Endovascular Options for the SFA and Popliteal: What Works Where and for How Long?

Endovascular Therapy vs. Open Femoral Endarterectomy Rationale and Design of the Randomized PESTO Trial

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

IN.PACT AV Access IDE Study Full Baseline Data. Robert Lookstein, MD MHCDL New York, NY On Behalf of the IN.PACT AV ACCESS Investigators

The Crack and Pave technique for highly resistant calcified lesions. Manuela Matschuck MD University Hospital Leipzig Department Angiology

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

4/14/2016. Faculty Disclosure. Drug-eluting technology in the SFA and Popliteal. Typical SFA Disease Pattern. Why Peripheral Artery Disease Matters

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

Lessons & Perspectives: What is the role of Cryoplasty in SFA Intervention?

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

CLI: Patient level Risk Factors and CLI Outcomes

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

Hiroshi Ando, MD Kasukabe Chuo General Hospital Saitama, Japan

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Current Status of DCB Experience with Non- Femoropopliteal Applications (Dialysis, Tibial, Venous)

Are RCT always needed: Experience with objective performance criteria (OPC)

Drug eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease A.T.O. ABDOOL-CARRIM UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

SFA CTO Lesion Management laser or directional atherectomy?

OCT Guided Atherectomy: Initial Results of the VISION Trial Using the Pantheris Catheter. Patrick Muck, MD

First time data release: Initial experience with the temporary Spur Stent System: DEEPER Trial first-in-man results Jihad A. Mustapha, MD, FACC,

Patterns of Vessel Calcification and Clinical Relevance

BTK Intervention with Drug- Coated Balloons: Past Lessons and Future Exploration

Transcription:

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project Dierk Scheinert, MD Division of Interventional Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany 1

Disclosure Speaker s name: Dierk Scheinert I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Advisory Board /Consultant: Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Cordis, CR Bard, Gardia Medical/Allium, Medtronic, TriReme Medical, Trivascular, Upstream Peripheral Technologies

Targeted Drug Delivery The Next Generation for PAD Local intimal drug therapy with paclitaxel has shown some limitations DES has shown improvements only in short-segment BTK disease Well-controlled clinical trials of DCB in BTK arteries have been inconsistent or disappointing Flaking of drug from balloons may have negative outflow consequences Eliminating the constraint of what drugs can be coated onto a balloon allows the exploration of many other medicines to treat the variety of patients we see each day Efficient delivery of liquid therapeutics beyond the vessel wall Target the root of the disease: inflammation Bypasses medial calcification regardless of diffusion kinetics Independent of balloon sizing, surface area and full contact to deliver an effective dose 3

Bullfrog Micro-Infusion Device Features Needle (34 Gauge) is constantly sheathed during manipulation to prevent vessel injury Balloon self-adjusts to a range of vessel diameters (2-4 mm, 3-6 mm or 4-8 mm) Balloon inflation limited to 2 atm to prevent barotrauma Contrast co-delivered with drug confirms realtime procedural success Each injection starts on one side and then spreads up, down and around the artery Diffusion continues over time to fill any visual gaps 4

Visualizing the Therapy 20% contrast : 80% drug is mixed and coadministered to provide immediate feedback Painting the vessel Above the knee Below the knee 5

Exploring the Alternatives in Targeted Drug Therapy Trauma Signaling Recruitment Proliferation Migration Obstruction Dexamethasone Temsirolimus SFA Popliteal Infrapop DANCE 281 subjects Open-label LIMBO-PTA & LIMBO-ATX 240 total subjects 1:1 RCT TANGO 60 total subjects Dose-escalation RCT

Biomarkers: CRP C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Normalized CRP Change in Median from Baseline to 24 Hours After Interventions 600% 500% 400% 514% No Dex 300% Circulating levels rise in response to inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6) expressed in response to local triggers (e.g. inflammation) Physiologic role: bind to dead or dying cells to activate the complement system via C1Q complex Elevations tied to restenosis [Schillinger et al. Radiology 2002; 225:21-26.] 200% 100% 0% Bullfrog/Dex 37% % Change from Baseline to 24 hours Non-Dex Control (DANCE-Partner Atherectomy, N=9) Dex Treatment (DANCE Atherectomy, N=42) 7

Biomarkers: MCP-1 Monocyte Chemoattractive Protein-1 (MCP-1) Normalized MCP-1 Change in Median from Baseline to 24 Hours After Interventions 30% 20% 10% 23% No Dex 0% -10% Recruits monocytes, memory T cells, and dendritic cells to the sites of inflammation produced by either tissue injury or infection Dexamethasone destabilizes the mrna that codes for MCP-1, shutting off its production Elevations tied to restenosis [Cipollone F, et al. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21:327-334.] -20% -30% -40% -50% Bullfrog/ Dex -46% % Change from Baseline to 24 hours Non-Dex Control (DANCE-Partner Atherectomy, N=9) Dex Treatment (DANCE Atherectomy, N=39) 8

Data from the DANCE Trial (Trial Overview) Multicenter, open-label trial in two populations: primary atherectomy (ATX) and primary angioplasty (PTA) Primary Endpoints Safety Composite of freedom from all cause peri-operative (30 day) death and freedom at 1 year in the index limb from major amputation (ATK or BTK), bypass surgery or thrombolysis Efficacy Primary patency of the target lesion at 1 year: Core lab adjudicated absence of binary restenosis (DUS PSVR > 2.4 or angiographic narrowing >50%) & freedom from clinicallydriven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) 9

DANCE Patient and Lesion Characteristics PTA ATX PTA ATX N (legs) 124 157 Age (years) 68.9±9.1 68.4±9.6 Male 65% 57% Caucasian 77% 80% African American 20% 17% Diabetes 52% 50% CAD 55% 67% Hypertension 90% 92% Hyperlipidemia 83% 80% Obesity (BMI 30 kg/m 2 ) 34% 34% Creatinine (mg/dl) 1.02±0.28 1.10±0.51 CRP, pre (mg/dl) 5.01±9.37 5.78±7.25 Rutherford Category TASC II Classification 2: 36.3% 3: 60.5% 4: 3.2% A: 53% B: 40% C: 6% D: 1% 2: 22.9% 3: 59.9% 4: 17.2% A: 30% B: 62% C: 6% D: 1% Severe Calcification 21.3% 29.4% Popliteal Involvement 15.3% 17.2% Mean Lesion Length (cm) 7.4 ± 4.0 8.8 ± 5.2 Mean % Diameter Stenosis (Pre) 73% ± 16% 70% ± 17% Total Occlusions 17% 15% Grade B-D Dissection 44% 26% Stent Utilization 52% 35% Mean % Diameter Stenosis (Post) 24%±12% 23%±9% 10

DANCE 12-Month Safety Safety Outcomes (ITT population) DANCE-PTA DANCE-ATX Device-related SAE 0-365 Days 0/124 (0.0%) 0/157 (0.0%) Drug-related SAE 0-365 Days 0/124 (0.0%) 0/157 (0.0%) Major Adverse Limb Events 0-365 Days Amputation Bypass Thrombolysis 0/114 (0.0%) 2/114 (1.8%) * 0/114 (0.0%) Death 0-30 Days 0/244 (0.0%) Death 0-365 Days Non-Cardiovascular Cardiovascular or Unknown *1 of 2 bypasses were performed after TLR endpoint was reached **The amputation was performed after TLR endpoint was reached ***1 of 2 bypasses were performed after TLR endpoint was reached 2/231 (0.9%) 7/231 (3.0%) 1/126 (0.8%) ** 2/126 (1.6%) *** 0/126 (0.0%)

DANCE 13-Month Efficacy DANCE-ATX DANCE-PTA 100% Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimate (PP) Freedom from TLR Primary Patency 89.6% 88.7% 100% Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimate (PP) Freedom from TLR Primary Patency 89.1% 89.1% 80% 60% 83.6% 80.0% 80% 60% 80.2% 78.2% 40% 40% 20% 20% 0% Days: 0 91 183 274 365 395 At Risk: 139 124 109 96 92 85 139 124 113 101 99 95 0% 0 91 183 274 365 103 96 85 79 103 101 92 88 108 108 395 77 88

Gaining Perspective: DANCE compared to DCB Trials 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Efficacy Outcomes: Patency at 390-395 days PTA alone PTA + (DCB or Bullfrog Micro-Infusion) Vessel Prep + Bullfrog Micro- Infusion 0% In.Pact PTA Stellarex PTA Lutonix PTA Lutonix DCB Stellarex DCB In.Pact DCB DANCE-PTA Bullfrog DANCE-ATX Bullfrog 13

Gaining Perspective: DANCE and DCB Subgroups 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% K-M Primary Patency at 12 months PTA and DCB results are a weighted average of Levant-2 and In.Pact-SFA results (assumes class effect) Is there a gender gap with DCB? Anti-inflammatory nature of DANCE Women lack estrogen production post-menopause Women have smaller vessels (less dose with DCB?) (more friable vessels?) Male Female 14

DANCE Subgroup Analysis (13-Month Primary Patency) Distal anatomy results justify examination in BTK SFA and Popliteal ATX: 80% patency (N=139, LL avg =8.8cm) PTA: 78% patency (N=108, LL avg =7.4cm) Popliteal Involvement ATX: 95% patency (N=23, LL avg =6.3) PTA: 77% patency (N=15, LL avg =5.8) P2-P3 Involvement ATX: 100% patency (N=10, LL avg =4.7) PTA: 75% patency (N=4, LL avg =8.8)

BTK: LIMBO Trials Underway Below-Knee Study in CLI 2 trials: Adventitial Dexamethasone added to PTA (Germany) or atherectomy (U.S.) LIMBO-PTA PI: Dierk Scheinert, MD, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (Began January 2016) LIMBO-ATX co-pis: George Adams, MD, UNC-Rex, Raleigh, NC Don Jacobs, MD, St. Louis University, MO LIMBO-ATX Baseline angiogram and biomarker blood draw 60 controls LIMBO-PTA 120 ATX (U.S.) 120 PTA (Germany) 60 DEX 60 controls 60 DEX 24-hour blood draw for biomarkers 1-month blood draw for biomarkers Clinical, hemodynamic and angiographic follow-up at 6 months 16

BTK: TANGO Trial in Preparation Phase 2, Below-Knee Study in CLI Adventitial Temsirolimus added to PTA or atherectomy revascularization Anticipated FIM 1Q2017 and expansion into European sites 3Q2017 PI: Ian Cawich, MD, Arkansas Heart Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA Baseline angiogram and biomarker blood draw 20 controls TANGO 60 subjects randomized 2:1 in 2 phases 20 low dose 20 high dose 24-hour blood draw for biomarkers 1-month blood draw for biomarkers Clinical, hemodynamic and angiographic follow-up at 6 months 17

Looking Forward Bullfrog delivery of dexamethasone after atherectomy in SFA and popliteal arteries has produced exceptional results compared to other drug delivery platforms in a challenging patient population This represents a paradigm shift in drug delivery to treat lower extremity atherosclerotic disease (an inflammatory process requires an anti-inflammatory remedy) DANCE may represent the first outcomes of the ability to target the therapy to the patient (personalized/precision medicine) Bullfrog delivery into the BTK area has begun with the LIMBO and TANGO trials, and with an elastase therapy from Proteon Therapeutics 18

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project Dierk Scheinert, MD Division of Interventional Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany 19