The Evolution of SFA Treatment Strategy with IN.PACT DCB

Similar documents
DCB level 1 evidence review

THE SCIENCE BEHIND DRUG COATED BALLOONS OUTCOMES

Are Drug-coated balloons Durable? Level 1 evidence review. Koen Keirse, MD Vascular Surgery, RZ Tienen Tienen, Belgium

Disclosures. How many people have heard a talk on DCBs? By show of hands, how many people here have used a DCB?

DESIGN GOALS AND PRE- CLINICAL EVIDENCE OF NEXT GENERATION DCB

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

Stellarex Drug-coated 0.035" Angioplasty Balloon. Featuring EnduraCoat Technology. The Clear DCB Choice

My most promising perspective for DCB

DCB From a Pre-Clinical Perspective: The Relevance of Paclitaxel Dose and Coating Integrity

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Drug Elution, Data, and Decisions

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

DURABLE. CONSISTENT. SAFE. IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

Adventitial Drug Infusion to Prevent Restenosis

Qizhuang Jin. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University Institute of Nephrology, Beijing, China

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Drug eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease A.T.O. ABDOOL-CARRIM UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

4/14/2016. Faculty Disclosure. Drug-eluting technology in the SFA and Popliteal. Typical SFA Disease Pattern. Why Peripheral Artery Disease Matters

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Stellarex. Drug-coated 0.035" angioplasty balloon. The clear DCB choice. Featuring EnduraCoat technology

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

How DCB drug dose effects vessel healing. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

New Drug Coated Balloons in Femoro-Popliteal Disease in Korea

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

12-Month and preliminary 24-month outcomes of combining a DCB with a modern generation of nitinol stent in fem-pop lesions. BIOLUX 4EVER study

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

REACT Treatment Rationale and Clinical Evidence. ICI Meeting 5th of December 2017

BIOLUX 4EVER : Combining Passeo-18 Lux DCB and Pulsar-18 BMS : 12 month results of full cohort

Current Status of DCB Experience with Non- Femoropopliteal Applications (Dialysis, Tibial, Venous)

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

ILLUMENATE Pivotal Stellarex DCB IDE Study 12-Month Results

Role of Covered Stents and Drug Eluting Balloons In Dialysis Access

Vessel Preparation Prior to DCB and Stenting: How to Do It.

BTK Intervention with Drug- Coated Balloons: Past Lessons and Future Exploration

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Best DCB outcomes in SFA TASC A&B lesions: EFFPAC-RCT 12-months follow-up

Disclosures. Rational Selection of Endovascular Options for the SFA and Popliteal: What Works Where and for How Long?

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

DCB + stent in the SFA

Evidence From the Next-Generation DCB

Vessel Preparation: What does it mean and what are the current tools? Lawrence Garcia, MD St. Elizabeth s Medical Center Boston, MA, USA

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

A study of downstream events of the two leading DCBs on the market. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

Update on the OPTIMIZE BTK Trial. Marianne Brodmann, MD Division of Angiology Medical University Graz, Austria

Disclosures. In the DCB Era, How Do I Choose To Use a Stent? When to Stent and What Devices to Use in the SFA

Femoropopliteal disease: This is the State- of- the- art. Peter A. Schneider, MD Kaiser Hospital Honolulu, Hawaii

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

IN ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA FAILURE

DCB + BMS is not a DES

Merits and demerits of DES, DEB or covered stent in lower extremity arterial occlusive disease 성균관의과대학삼성서울병원순환기내과최승혁

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

Biology of in-stent restenosis and rational for debulking

Update on the role of drug eluting balloons

Neuestes aus der Therapie der pavk. beschichtete Stents + Ballons. Karls-University. Eberhard-Karls. of Tubingen Department of Diagnostic Radiology

The latest generation DEB

Drug delivery to the vessel wall: Coated balloons and the role of the excipient

Combination therapy : treatment rationale and clinical evidence

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

Drug eluting devices: Why paclitaxel works above the knee and sirolimus below the knee, is the stent or the drug?

Comparison of particulate embolization in different DCB formulations. Aloke V. Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD.

IN.PACT AV Access IDE Study Full Baseline Data. Robert Lookstein, MD MHCDL New York, NY On Behalf of the IN.PACT AV ACCESS Investigators

Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

Session: DEB their Utility. Innovation in Drug Coated Balloons

Patterns of Vessel Calcification and Clinical Relevance

Innovations are created to solve the limitations of an

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Endovascular Innovations Today and Tomorrow. Zaheed Tai, DO, FACC, FSCAI Winter Haven Hospital Heart of Florida

Robert W. Fincher, DO The Ritz-Carlton, Dove Mountain Marana, Arizona February 7th, 2015

Clinical Outcomes of Repetition of Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Restenosis After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

Superficial Femoral Artery Intervention: The gift that keeps on giving! Wm. Britton Eaves,MD WKHSC Bossier City, LA

Transcription:

The Evolution of SFA Treatment Strategy with IN.PACT DCB JOS VAN DEN BERG, MD OSPEDALE REGIONALE DI LUGANO LUGANO, SWITZERLAND RAPHAEL COSCAS, MD HÔPITAL AMBROISE PARÉ BOULOGNE BILLANCOURT, FRANCE ROBERTO FERRARESI, MD HUMANITAS GAVEZZENI BERGAMO, ITALY

Drug-Coated Balloons Seeing the Differences through the Mechanisms of Action RAPHAEL COSCAS, MD HÔPITAL AMBROISE PARÉ BOULOGNE BILLANCOURT, FRANCE

The Challenge in Interpreting Data: Variables Obscure Comparisons of Trials and Devices Length Location Calcification Occlusion Lesions Study Design Randomization Blinding Reporting Methods Follow-up interval KM v per-protocol Definitions Patients Devices Diabetic status Age Gender Symptom status Patency PSVR threshold TLR v CD-TLR Adverse events Across classes Within class

DCB Pivotal Trial Comparisons: Primary Patency of FDA-Approved DCBs 1 IN.PACT SFA LEVANT II How does DCB design influence mechanism of action? ILLUMENATE Pivotal RCT 1. Primary patency and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates may be calculated differently, and therefore may not be directly comparable; chart is for illustration only. 2. IN.PACT SFA Trial values represent IN.PACT Admiral DCB arm as evaluated by 36-mo Kaplan-Meier, patency defined as PSVR 2.4 and freedom from TLR defined here as clinically-driven TLR; IN.PACT Admiral Instructions for Use M052624T001 Rev 1F. 3. LEVANT II values represent Lutonix 035 arm as evaluated by 730-day Kaplan-Meier, patency defined as PSVR 2.5 and freedom from TLR defined here as all TLR; Lutonix 035 Instructions for Use BAW1387400r3.. 4. ILLUMENATE RCT Pivotal values represent Stellarex as evaluated by 410-day Kaplan-Meier, patency defined as PSVR 2.5 and freedom from clinically-driven TLR; Stellarex Instructions for Use No. P011966-C Rev 07/2017.

Design Summary of the FDA-Approved DCBs Excipient is critical in delivering and sustaining paclitaxel in the tissue. All three devices use paclitaxel dosing significantly lower than other medical applications 1 Excipient is unique to each DCB IN.PACT Admiral DCB Lutonix * 035 DCB Stellarex * DCB Drug (Dose) Paclitaxel (3.5µg/mm 2 ) Paclitaxel (2.0µg/mm 2 ) Paclitaxel (2.0µg/mm 2 ) Excipient Urea Polysorbate-Sorbitol Polyethylene Glycol 1. Ng, Vivian. Eur J Clinical Investigation 2015;45(3):333-345

Solid-Phase Drug Enables Sustained Effect Without a permanent scaffold like DES, DCB must transfer drug to the tissue in a manner that enables a long-term effect on restenosis. 1 Solid-phase drug delivery The DCB delivers solid-phase paclitaxel to the vessel, establishing reservoirs of drug 2 Sustained drug availability These reservoirs provide a source of soluble drug which is available to exert an anti-proliferative effect on tissue 3 Prolonged anti-proliferative effect With extended drug availability, the antiproliferative effect of paclitaxel is prolonged 1.Data on file at Medtronic. Representative micrograph 28-days post drug delivery. 1

1 Solid-Phase Drug Transition Transition from solid- to soluble-phase is different through 24 hours. 1-2 Bench-top porcine plasma model reveals that both devices transfer solid-phase paclitaxel from the DCB Subsequent transition from solid-phase to soluble-phase occurs at different rates At 24 hours, IN.PACT Admiral DCB retains more drug in solid-phase than Polysorbate-Sorbitol DCB** 1.Data on file with Medtronic. 2.Virmani R, Arterial wall response to drug-coated balloon use presented at Charing Cross, London 2016. * IN.PACT Admiral DCB ** Lutonix * 035

Personal experimental approach Boitet A (Master of Science), Coscas R. Unpublished data 2017

Personal experimental approach Sacrifice H2 Samples Aorta Plasma DCB Muscles Thigh: TFL, Vastus lateralis Leg: Tibialis cranialis Blinded dosage PTX by high pressure liquid chromatography Boitet A (Master of Science), Coscas R. Unpublished data 2017

PTX in the aortic wall 120 100 80 60 40 20 * Lutonix In.Pact Stellarex 0 Aorte (ng/mg) Boitet A (Master of Science), Coscas R. Unpublished data 2017

PTX in the Plasma * 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Lutonix In.Pact Stellarex 2 1 0 Plasma (ng/ml) Boitet A (Master of Science), Coscas R. Unpublished data 2017

2 Sustained Drug Availability Higher percentage of solid-phase drug is associated with higher drug tissue concentration through 90 days. 1-2 Urea DCB* (3.5µg/mm 2 ) Polysorbate-Sorbitol DCB** (2µg/mm 2 ) In vivo porcine model used to quantify sustained drug residence in tissue 1.Data on file with Medtronic; Study PS747. 2.Virmani R, Arterial wall response to drug-coated balloon use presented at Charing Cross, London 2016. * IN.PACT Admiral DCB ** Lutonix * 035

2 Sustained Drug Availability Different tissue drug concentrations also demonstrated in a similar headto-head experiment between devices of different drug dosage. 1 Healthy Porcine Arterial Model In vivo porcine model used to quantify sustained drug residence in tissue. 1.Data on file with Medtronic; Study PS767. 2.Stellarex * DCB 3.IN.PACT Admiral DCB

2 IN-STENT Restenosis Animal Study Plan Purpose To compare efficacy of IN.PACT Admiral DCB to Stellarex * drug coated balloons (DCBs) with in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions in a Yucatan swine model Objective Execute a controlled restenotic model, treat with DCB and assess qualitative vascular angiography (QVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging at 60 and 90 day post DCB treatment with drug in tissue determination at 90 days Methods Creation of ISR model in swine peripheral vasculature by injuring the target artery with angioplasty and stenting. 28 days post-stent implantation, treat the target vasculature with DCB, (Treatment Day 0) Image treated site at Day 0, Day 60 and Day 90 Sample tissue for drug content at 90 days post treatment

2 Sustained Drug Availability Different tissue drug concentrations also demonstrated in similar head-tohead experiment between devices of different drug dosage. 1 Healthy Porcine Arterial Model Higher input drug concentration facilitates greater long-term concentrations. 1.Data on file with Medtronic; Study PS781. 2.Stellarex * DCB 3.IN.PACT Admiral DCB

3 Prolonged Anti-Proliferative Effect Higher percentage of solid-phase drug is associated with continued trend of smooth muscle cell loss through 90 days. 1-2 * ** Urea DCB 3 (3.5µg/mm 2 ) * P = 0.0380 ** P = 0.0304 In vivo porcine model used to quantify smooth muscle cell loss through 90 days Urea DCB 3 (3.5µg/mm 2 ) Polysorbate- Sorbitol DCB 4 (2µg/mm 2 ) Polysorbate- Sorbitol DCB 4 (2µg/mm 2 ) 1.Data on file with Medtronic; PS747. 2.Virmani R, Arterial wall response to drug-coated balloon use presented at Charing Cross, London 2016. 3.IN.PACT Admiral DCB 4.Lutonix * 035

Keys to Sustained Effect 1-2 Solid-phase paclitaxel at 24h 1-2 1 Solid-phase drug delivery 2 Sustained drug availability 3 Prolonged antiproliferative effect 1.Data on file with Medtronic. Ninety-day differences in artery depth delta and artery circumference demonstrate p=0.0380 and p=0.0304, respectively (right panel). 2.Virmani R, Arterial wall response to drug-coated balloon use presented at Charing Cross, London 2016.

1. Presented by Schneider, P, VIVA Las Vegas, USA 2017. 2. Tepe G, et al. Circ 131:495-502 (2015). 3. Rosenfield K, et al. NEJM 373:145-53 (2015). 4. Schroeder H, et al. Circ 2017;135:2227-2236. 5. Virmani R, Arterial wall response to drug-coated balloon use presented at Charing Cross, London 2016. Conclusions IN.PACT Admiral DCB demonstrates durable results through three, and now, four years, and consistent results across numerous clinical scenarios 1 DCBs as a class demonstrate promising results, though clinical observations suggest performance is device-specific 2-4 Performance of IN.PACT Admiral is a product of its unique design which enables transfer of solidphase paclitaxel to sustain an anti-proliferative effect 5