ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Efficacy of the Semont Maneuver in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Similar documents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE. A New Physical Maneuver for the Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

So Young Moon, M.D., Kwang-Dong Choi, M.D., Seong-Ho Park, M.D., Ji Soo Kim, M.D.

exercise HOW TO DO IT: PRACTICAL NEUROLOGY

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Vibration Does Not Improve Results of the Canalith Repositioning Procedure

Particle Liberation Maneuvers for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Quick Guides Vestibular Diagnosis and Treatment:

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is characterized by brief recurrent episodes of

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Efficacy of Postural Restriction in Treating Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Prognosis of patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo treated with repositioning manoeuvres

Daily Exercise Does Not Prevent Recurrence of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

BPPV: pathophysiology, subtypes and therapy Marco Mandalà

The New England Journal of Medicine. Review Article

Clinical Characteristics of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo in Korea: A Multicenter Study

Monitoring of Caloric Response and Outcome in Patients With Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: clinical characteristics of dizzy patients referred to a Falls and Syncope Unit

BPPV and Pitfalls in its Management. Reza Golrokhian Sani MD, Otolaryngologist- Head & Neck Surgeon Otologist & Neurotologist

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Strategies to Prevent Recurrence of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Management of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Comparative Study between Epleys Manouvre and Betahistine

B enign paroxysmal positioning vertigo (BPPV) is

Clinical Significance of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (a.k.a.) Diagnosis: Dix-Hallpike Maneuver. Case SH. BPPV nystagmus. MMT ENG course --- BPPV 6/3/2012

BENIGN PAROXYSMAL POSITIONAL VERTIGO (BPPV)

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. Jeff Walter PT, DPT, NCS

Following the first description in 1921, benign paroxysmal

Comparison of repositioning maneuvers for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of posterior semicircular canal: advantages of hybrid maneuver,

BENIGN PAROXYSMAL POSITIONAL VERTIGO

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo through Particle Repositioning Manoeuvre: An Observational and Prospective Study

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (a.k.a.) Diagnosis: Dix-Hallpike Maneuver. Case SH. BPPV nystagmus. Video Frenzel Goggles make it easier

Evidence-Based Practice for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

A Comparison of Two Home Exercises for Benign Positional Vertigo: Half Somersault versus Epley Maneuver

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Pseudo-Spontaneous Nystagmus in Lateral Semicircular Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Benign paroxysmal positional. Labyrinth. Canalolithiasis. Specialized dizzy clinic - most frequent diagnoses. Semicircular canals

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (a.k.a.) Diagnosis: Dix-Hallpike Maneuver. Case SH. BPPV nystagmus. Video Frenzel Goggles make it easier

BPPV latest thoughts and the atypical varieties Dr Soumit Dasgupta

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Aim: To assess whether more than one Epley s maneuver

Cross Country Education Leading the Way in Continuing Education and Professional Development.

Because dizziness is an imprecise term, a major role of the clinician is to sort patients out into categories

How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journal's homepage in redalyc.org

Vertigo. Definition. Causes. (Dizziness) Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) Labyrinthitis. by Karen Schroeder, MS, RD

THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES

Disclosures. Goals. Canalith Repositioning Basics to Advanced. John Li, M.D. We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in patients after mild traumatic brain injury

Acute Vestibular Syndrome (AVS) 12/5/2017

Pseudo-Spontaneous and Head-Shaking Nystagmus in Horizontal Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Impact of Postmaneuver Sleep Position on Recurrence of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Vertigo: A practical approach to diagnosis and treatment. John Waterston

Sasan Dabiri, MD, Assistant Professor

BENIGN PAROXYSMAL POSITIONAL VERTIGO

Epley and beyond: an update on treating positional vertigo

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Vertigo. Definition Important history questions Examination Common vertigo cases and management Summary

B enign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is probably the

Vestibular Rehabilitation

Int J Clin Exp Med 2016;9(6): /ISSN: /IJCEM Yan-Xing Zhang, Cheng-Long Wu, Fang-Fang Zhong, Chun-Na Ding

Introduction. Alia Saberi 1 Shadman Nemati. Ehsan Kazemnejad 4

BENIGN PAROXYSMAL POSITIONAL VERTIGO

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo after dental surgery

OBJECTIVES BALANCE EVALUATION COMMON CAUSES OF BALANCE DEFICITS POST TBI BRAIN INJURY BALANCE RELATIONSHIP

BPPV Resource Packet

The Dizziness Handicap Inventory and Its Relationship with Vestibular Diseases

Vestibular Evaluation

D own beat nystagmus (DBN) in primary gaze is a sign of

The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (Unknown)

CITY & HACKNEY PATHFINDER CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP. Vertigo. (1) Vertigo. (4) Provisional Diagnosis. (5) Investigations. lasting days or weeks

DOI: /01.wnl ac. This information is current as of May 27, 2008

Prevalence of vestibulopathy in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo patients with and without prior otologic history

Efficacy of Computer-Controlled Repositioning Procedure for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Dizziness: Natural Treatment for Vertigo and BPPV

A New Method for Evaluating Lateral Semicircular Canal Cupulopathy

Managing Acute Vertigo for the Non-Vestibular PT. Objectives 4/12/2018

Dizziness is VERY Common. Dizziness is an imprecise term. Diagnostic Categories. Question. Answer 1. The Dizzy Patient Recent advances (2007)

Dominic J Mort 23/03/17 Spire Bushey Hospital

Delayed Endolymphatic Hydrops: Episodic Vertigo of Delayed Onset after Profound Inner Ear Hearing Loss

Ejido, Almería, Spain PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Assessing the Deaf & the Dizzy. Phil Bird Senior Lecturer University of Otago, Christchurch Consultant Otolaryngologist CPH & Private

Control of eye movement

Bayram Ugurlu, Muhammed Fatih Evcimik, Fazıl Emre Ozkurt, Tarik Sapci, Ali Okan Gursel

Clinical Study Effect of Repositioning Maneuver Type and Postmaneuver Restrictions on Vertigo and Dizziness in Benign Positional Paroxysmal Vertigo

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

in practice Interpretation of Static Position Testing in VNG/ENG Biography Abstract: Kamran Barin, Ph.D. May 2008

Diagnostic criteria for vestibular neuritis

MÉNIÈRE S DISEASE (MD)

Tumarkin-like phenomenon as a sign of therapeutic success in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Commonly Occurs Following Repair of Superior Canal Dehiscence

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) Following Dental Surgical Procedures : Short Clinical Study

The Big 3 of Vertigo

Comparison between Semonts Maneuvere and Beta Histine in the Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

ANTERIOR CANAL BPPV and its controversies. Marco Mandalà

Case Report Intra-Attack Vestibuloocular Reflex Changes in Ménière s Disease

DIZZINESS & VERTIGO A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH

TITLE. Clinical Practice Guideline: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (Update) AUTHORS

Welcome to Fall CE Event 2015

VERTIGO. Tuesday 20 th February 2018 Dr Rukhsana Hussain. Disclaimers apply:

JMSCR Vol 04 Issue 11 Page November 2016

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss; Prognostic Factors

Transcription:

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Efficacy of the Semont Maneuver in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Emmanuel Levrat, MD; Guy van Melle, PhD; Philippe Monnier, MD; Raphaël Maire, MD Objectives: To assess the efficacy of the Semont maneuver in the treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) of the posterior semicircular canal and to evaluate the possible effect of various factors on the efficacy of this maneuver. Design and Setting: Retrospective study in an outpatient clinic. Patients: Two hundred seventy-eight patients presenting with symptomatic, unilateral BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal, exclusively treated with the Semont maneuver. Interventions: During the first consultation, each patient was treated with a Semont maneuver. When BPPV persisted, this maneuver was repeated during follow-up visits, performed at weekly intervals. Main Outcome Measures: Patients were considered cured when vertigo disappeared within 3 days (allowing up to 4 maneuvers). Results: More than 9% of patients were cured after a maximum of 4 maneuvers, and 83.5% were cured after only 2 maneuvers. The efficacy of the maneuver decreased each time it was repeated (from 62.6% at the first maneuver to 18.2% at the fourth). The duration of symptoms before initial consultation and the etiology of BPPV had a significant effect on the maneuver s efficacy (P.1 and P=.2, respectively), whereas age (P=.12), sex (P=.6), and affected side (P=.2) had no effect. Conclusions: The Semont maneuver demonstrated a 9.3% cure rate after a maximum of 4 sessions. Patients consulting late ( 6 months after the beginning of symptoms) or having traumatic BPPV had lower recovery rates than patients without these factors (74.7% vs 96.5%). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 23;129:629-633 From the Otoneurology Unit, Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Clinic, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (Drs Levrat, Monnier, and Maire), and University Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (Dr van Melle), Lausanne, Switzerland. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article. BENIGN PAROXYSMAL positional vertigo (BPPV) is a frequent cause of dizziness and, according to Nedzelski et al, 1 represents some 17% of vertigo cases investigated in an otoneurologic unit. The annual incidence of this disease is estimated at 64 cases per 1 people. 2 The most frequent cause is a mechanical disorder in the posterior semicircular canal; impairment stemming from the horizontal and anterior semicircular canal has been reported, but it is much rarer. 3 Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior semicircular canal (p-bppv) occurs during rapid rotational motions of the head toward the affected ear when the neck is hyperextended. It can be clinically provoked using triggering maneuvers, such as those described by Dix and Hallpike 4 or Brandt and Daroff. 5 It is characterized by a brief attack of rotational vertigo, neurovegetative disturbances of varying intensity, and a characteristic nystagmus. This nystagmus is linear or rotatory, geotropic, and lasts less than 1 minute; has a latency period between the maneuver that evokes it and its appearance; lessens when this maneuver is repeated (fatigability); and changes direction as soon as the patient returns to a sitting position at the end of the maneuver (reversibility). Following the histopathological discovery in 1969 of basophilic deposits on the cupula of the posterior canal, Schuknecht 6 proposed the theory of cupulolithiasis as the causal mechanism of BPPV. This theory is based on the hypothesis that detached otolithic debris from the utricular macula can deposit on the vestibular side of the posterior canal cupula, thus transforming it into a linear acceleration transducer, sensitive to the effects of gravity. In 1992, Parnes and McClure 7 identified free-floating particles in the endolymph of the posterior canal, thus supporting a canalolithiasis mechanism 629

Table 1. Etiologies of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo and Their Distribution by Sex Female Patients (n = 181) as the cause of BPPV. Canalolithiasis is considered a more probable pathophysiological mechanism for BPPV than cupulolithiasis and provides a better explanation for the clinical characteristics of this disease. 8 In most cases, the etiology of BPPV cannot be identified, but the symptoms are frequently preceded by head trauma or vestibular neuritis. 9,1 In addition, numerous pathologic conditions associated with BPPV have been described in the literature, but a causal relationship has not been established. 9-17 Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo has a tendency to spontaneously disappear, usually after a few weeks, but if no treatment is undertaken, it may persist several months or years. Relapses can likewise occur. The current treatment of choice for p-bppv is physiotherapy, and 2 types of maneuvers have been developed: (1) positioning maneuvers based on repeating the triggering maneuver, the aim of which is to disperse debris into the utricular cavity or to promote central habituation mechanisms 5,18 and (2) liberatory maneuvers aimed at dislodging inorganic fragments located on the cupula of the posterior canal or floating in the canal, such as the maneuvers by Semont et al 19 and Epley. 2 The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate the efficacy of the Semont maneuver in treating p- BPPV and to assess the possible effect of various factors on the efficacy of this maneuver. METHODS PATIENTS Male Patients (n = 97) (N = 278) Idiopathic 118 (69.8) 51 (3.2) 169 Traumatic 26 (44.8) 32 (55.2) 58 Infectious* 21 (72.4) 8 (27.6) 29 Miscellaneous 16 (72.7) 6 (27.3) 22 *Infectious etiologies included viral neurolabyrinthitis (13 patients), viral upper respiratory tract disease (15 patients), and Escherichia coli septicemia (1 patient). Miscellaneous etiologies included prolonged bed rest (5 patients), Ménière disease (4 patients), ear surgery (3 patients), vertebrobasilar insufficiency (2 patients), multiple sclerosis (2 patients), otosclerosis (1 patient), ototoxicity (1 patient), acoustic neuroma (1 patient), collagenosis (scleroderma) (1 patient), multiple myeloma (1 patient), and migraine (1 patient). This retrospective study included 278 patients, examined between March 1, 1993, and March 1, 1999, who presented with a symptomatic, unilateral p-bppv and who were exclusively treated with the Semont maneuver. There were 181 females and 97 males, with a median age of 55 1 2 years (range, 13 1 2 to 91 1 2 years). The diagnosis of p-bppv was made using the triggering maneuver of Brandt and Daroff 5 as follows: the patient is seated on an examining table facing the examiner; then he or she is rapidly laid down on the affected side with the head rotated, nose facing up at 45 to the horizon, which provokes a vertigo with linear or rotatory (torsional), geotropic (ie, beating toward the undermost ear), or upbeating nystagmus, according to the position of the eyes in the orbit. Patients presenting with BPPV of the anterior and horizontal canals were excluded. Approximately 7% of patients sought medical attention within the first month following the onset of symptoms. Patients were classified according to the etiology of BPPV and subdivided into 4 categories similar to those of Baloh et al 9 : idiopathic, traumatic, infectious, and miscellaneous. The Semont maneuver was performed after the triggering maneuver: after maintaining the Brandt and Daroff position for approximately 2 minutes, the patient is rapidly returned to a contralateral decubitus position, nose down. If the maneuver is effective, a vertigo with nystagmus beating toward the uppermost ear is observed. After about 3 minutes, the patient is then gently raised to a seated position. Only a single maneuver was performed during any one session. The patient was then followed-up at intervals of approximately 1 week, and the maneuver was repeated if the vertigo persisted. The patient was considered cured when the symptoms had completely disappeared. Because p-bppv can spontaneously resolve within a few weeks, a time limit of 3 days (allowing time to perform 4 Semont maneuvers) was fixed, after which recovery from p-bppv was no longer attributed to the Semont maneuver. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The success of the Semont maneuver is described by a generalized linear model in which it is assumed that the probability of success at any given session is a fixed percentage of the probability that existed at the preceding maneuver. This type of model is flexible and requires only 2 factors, the initial success rate and the deterioration of this rate during repetitions that some patients require. If this coefficient of reproduction does not differ significantly from 1%, one can assume that the maneuver retains the same efficacy throughout the different repetitions. To adapt the model to the data, the method of maximum likelihood was used, and the likelihood ratio test was used in a regression approach to determine the factors that played a significant role on the 2 factors of interest. The model was fitted at each level of the significant factors. To assess the quality of the fit, a classic goodness-of-fit 2 test was performed that compared the observed counts with those predicted by the model for each specific category of the significant factors. A multivariate analysis was also performed to determine which combinations of the significant factors were important. The level of significance was set at P.5. As an example, the likelihood of success after the third maneuver can be written as: (1 P) (1 P) 2 P, where P is the initial probability of success and represents the effect of the maneuver repetition. The expression describes the failure of the first maneuver (1 P), then the failure of the second maneuver (1 P), and the success of the third maneuver ( 2 P), where 2 represents the double reduction of efficacy associated with the 2 previous attempts. RESULTS Table 1 gives the various etiologies and their distribution by sex. The female-male ratio was more than 2:1 for all etiologies except trauma, for which there were more males than females. Among the 278 patients studied, 251 (9.3%) were cured after a maximum of 4 Semont maneuvers. Figure 1 shows the distribution of patients healed at each Semont maneuver performed and the 9.7% (27 patients) who were not cured within 3 days. Table 2 presents the classification of patients 63

as a function of the different factors studied, as well as the global efficacy of the Semont maneuver (cumulative rate of recovery after a maximum of 4 maneuvers). Patients were subdivided according to age into 3 categories, each containing approximately the same number of patients. Figure 2 shows that the efficacy recorded was 62.6% (174/278) for the first Semont maneuver, 55.8% (58/14) for the second, 28.3% (13/ 46) for the third, and 18.2% (6/33) for the fourth. The other curve in the figure is obtained from the linear model defined in the Statistical Analysis subsection of the Methods section. This model accurately describes the observations and can be considered as a smoothing of the data. The probability of recovery after the first maneuver is thus estimated at 64% and decreases by an level of.71 for each repeated maneuver. In the regression analysis, the duration of symptoms before consultation had a significant effect on the efficacy of the Semont maneuver (P.1). Table 3 gives the raw data and the goodness of fit of the model for the different categories of duration. Figure 3 shows the level of recovery among the 4 duration categories as smoothed out by the model. Patients who waited longer than 6 months had the poorest probability of initial recovery (46.2%) and the worst deterioration rate ( =.42), while patients who consulted within 1 week after symptom onset had a nonsignificant decrease in efficacy (P=.18). The etiology of BPPV also had a significant effect on the efficacy of the Semont maneuver (P=.2). Table 4 gives the data and goodness of fit of the model for the different etiologies. The quality of the fit in Table 4 is not as good as that for Table 3. However, the low P=.3 for the idiopathic category is not to be considered as a rejection of the proposed model. Indeed, the goodness-of-fit test was performed 8 times (4 in Table 3 and 4 in Table 4), and a Bonferroni approach requires that P be compared with.5 divided by 8, which is.6; thus, P=.3 is far from significant. Figure 4 shows the recovery rate among the 4 etiological categories as smoothed out by the model. The traumatic category had the poorest probability of initial recovery (5.5%) and the worst deterioration rate ( =.62). For the infectious and miscellaneous categories, the deterioration was not significant (P=.2 and P=.7, respectively). Age (P=.12), sex (P=.6), and affected side (P=.2) had no significant effect on the efficacy of the Semont maneuver. A multivariate regression analysis showed that patients presenting with traumatic BPPV or BPPV lasting longer than 6 months had a recovery rate of 74.7% (59/79), while patients not having any of these factors had a recovery rate of 96.5% (192/199). COMMENT The Semont maneuver is effective, demonstrating a 9.3% recovery rate after 4 maneuvers. We assume that this is primarily a result of the treatment, although spontaneous resolution may occur in some patients during the evaluation period. Similar results have been reported by Serafini et al, 16 who obtained a 94% success rate after 4 maneuvers. Other therapeutic maneuvers have proven effective in curing p-bppv, such as the Epley 2 maneuver or its modifications as developed by 62.6 2.9 First Semont Second Semont Third Semont Fourth Semont Patients Not Cured Within 3 d various authors. 21-27 However, studies that have compared the efficacy of some of these maneuvers with that of the Semont liberatory maneuver 23 or a slightly modified Semont maneuver 21 have not shown significant differences in the rates of patient recovery. Although the Semont liberatory maneuver was initially conceived based on the cupulolithiasis hypothesis, the way it is 9.7 4.7 2.1 Figure 1. Percentages of patients healed with each Semont maneuver performed. Rate of Recovery, % Table 2. Factors Investigated and Cumulative Rate of Recovery After a Maximum of 4 Semont Maneuvers* Factors Patients (N = 278) % Cured Idiopathic 169 (6.8) 92.9 Traumatic 58 (2.9) 75.9 Infectious 29 (1.4) 96.6 Miscellaneous 22 (7.9) 1 Duration of symptoms before initiating treatment 1 wk 116 (41.7) 97.4 1 wkto 1 mo 76 (27.3) 9.8 1 to 6 mo 57 (2.5) 89.5 6 mo 29 (1.4) 62.1 Age, y 13 1 2 to 47 94 (33.8) 93.6 47 1 2 to 63 92 (33.1) 85.9 63 92 (33.1) 91.3 Sex Female 181 (65.1) 93.4 Male 97 (34.9) 84.5 Affected side Right 159 (57.2) 93.1 Left 119 (42.8) 86.6 *Data are given as number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. Some percentages do not sum to 1 because of rounding. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Figure 2. Efficacy of the successive Semont maneuvers. Observed Efficacy Model 631

Table 3. Raw Data and Goodness of Fit of the Model for the Different Categories of Symptom Duration* Duration Success No. of Semont Maneuvers Failure Model Factors Probability of Initial Success, % 2 1 Goodness of Fit, P Value 1 wk 79 (68.1) 26 (7.3) 4 (36.4) 4 (57.1) 3 (2.6) 116 69..91.27 1wkto 1 mo 46 (6.5) 16 (53.3) 5 (35.7) 2 (22.2) 7 (9.2) 76 61.5.78.46 1to 6 mo 36 (63.2) 12 (57.1) 3 (33.3) 6 (1.5) 57 65.1.7.17 6 mo 13 (44.8) 4 (25.) 1 (8.3) 11 (37.9) 29 46.2.42.5 174 58 13 6 27 278 63.9.73.39 *Data are given as number (percentage) of patients unless otherwise indicated. 2 4. Predicted Recovery Rate, %.7.6.5.4.3.2.1 Overall 1 wk >1 wk to 1 mo >1 mo to 6 mo >6 mo Figure 3. Effect of the duration of symptoms before the first consultation on the efficacy of the successive Semont maneuvers. carried out can equally account for a repositioning of free-floating particles in the ampullofugal branch of the posterior canal (canalolithiasis) toward the utricule. 28 Our results show that most patients (83.5%) are cured after only 2 Semont maneuvers and that ensuing maneuvers only slightly improve (6.8%) the global recovery rate. Nevertheless, this supplementary recovery rate, apparently weak, represents 41.3% (19/46) of patients not cured after the first 2 maneuvers. It is, therefore, well worth the effort to repeat the maneuver several times. Conceptually, the probability of recovery could be the same for each Semont maneuver repeated on any given patient. However, it is noted that generally the more one repeats the maneuver the poorer the probability that the maneuver leads to recovery. Results obtained in this study support the hypothesis that, within any given category of patients, this decrease appears constant (represented by in the model). However, some categories have an that is not significantly different from 1, ie, no decrease in efficacy. Among the various factors of interest investigated, the etiology of BPPV and the duration of symptoms before initiating treatment prove to have a significant effect on the efficacy of the Semont maneuver. It appears that traumatic BPPV and BPPV lasting more than 6 months are less responsive to the treatment. Indeed, when patients present with 1 of these factors, the level of success of the Semont maneuver is not more than 74.7%, while it increases to 96.5% if both factors are absent. In addition, the 8 patients who presented with traumatic BPPV that lasted longer than 6 months had a poorer prognosis for recovery. Indeed, only 3 of these were cured (results not shown), suggesting that the negative effects of these factors may be cumulative. It is possible that traumatic BPPV results from more severe otolithic or endolabyrinthine damage than that seen in nontraumatic BPPV. This would explain the stronger resistance to therapeutic maneuvers. The fact that patients seeking treatment later respond less favorably to the Semont maneuver has already been reported by others, 16 but it remains unexplained. For these patients in whom the prognosis is not excellent with the Semont maneuver, it may be indicated to replace this liberatory maneuver with an alternate treatment, as suggested by some authors. 23 In light of our results, we suggest that the change should occur after the second Semont maneuver. On the other hand, the large group of patients who consulted within 1 week after the beginning of symptoms had a very good prognosis of healing (97.4%), because the probability of success remains the same at each maneuver. Therefore, for these patients, there is no indication to move to an alternate treatment. Two other categories of patient etiologies (infectious and miscellaneous) also showed a nondecreasing rate of success. However, their sizes were small (Table 2) and these results should be approached with caution. The greater prevalence of women (2:1) among patients with BPPV, as well as the higher prevalence of women among patients with idiopathic BPPV (2.3:1), has been previously reported in the literature. 9,1,14,16,29 The hypothesis of a hormonal effect on the formation of endolymphatic deposits, especially postmenopausal, has been proposed 29 but, again, has never been demonstrated. The predominance of traumatic BPPV among men, primarily noted in young individuals, is likely because of a risk behavior that is usually more frequently observed among these individuals and may explain the near significance (P=.6) of the effect of sex on the efficacy of the maneuver. Curiously, BPPV is preferentially localized to the right side (57.2%, P.2). We cannot propose a rational explanation for this phenomenon, which has also been observed in other studies. 1,16,29 CONCLUSIONS The Semont liberatory maneuver is an effective treatment for p-bppv, curing 9.3% of patients in a maximum of 4 sessions and 83.5% after only 2 sessions. 632

Table 4. Raw Data and Goodness of Fit of the Model for the Different Etiologies of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo* Success No. of Semont Maneuvers Failure Model Factors Probability of Initial Success, % 2 1 Goodness of Fit, P Value Idiopathic 11 (65.1) 37 (62.7) 9 (4.9) 1 (7.7) 12 (7.1) 169 66.8.78.3 Traumatic 29 (5.) 1 (34.5) 3 (15.8) 2 (12.5) 14 (24.1) 58 5.5.62.65 Infectious 22 (75.9) 6 (85.7) 1 (3.4) 29 77.8.81.1 Miscellaneous 13 (59.1) 5 (55.6) 1 (25.) 3 (1.) 22 55.2 1.7.4 174 58 13 6 27 278 63.9.73.8 *Data are given as number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. 2 4. Predicted Recovery Rate, % 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 When the patient belatedly seeks medical attention ( 6 months from symptom onset) or when BPPV has a traumatic origin, the success rate is less satisfactory (74.7%) than in patients without these conditions (96.5%). In the less satisfactory groups, pursuing the treatment beyond the second maneuver yields little benefit and may indicate the need to change the treatment. On the contrary, some groups have a good prognosis, such as patients consulting within 1 week after symptom onset, in whom the Semont maneuver is a treatment of choice. Accepted for publication October 24, 22. Corresponding author and reprints: Raphaël Maire, MD, Unité d Otoneurologie, Service d Oto-rhino-laryngologie et chirurgie cervico-faciale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 111 Lausanne, Switzerland (e-mail: Raphael.Maire@chuv.hospvd.ch). REFERENCES Overall Idiopathic Traumatic Infectious Miscellaneous Figure 4. Effect of the etiology of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo on the efficacy of the successive Semont maneuvers. 1. Nedzelski JM, Barber HO, McIlmoyl L. Diagnoses in a dizziness unit. J Otolaryngol. 1986;15:11-14. 2. Froehling DA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Beatty CW, Offord KP, Ballard DJ. Benign positional vertigo Mayo Clin Proc. 1991;66:596-61. 3. Honrubia V, Baloh RW, Harris MR, Jacobson KM. Paroxysmal positional vertigo syndrome. AmJOtol. 1999;2:465-47. 4. Dix MR, Hallpike CS. The pathology, symptomatology and diagnosis of certain common disorders of the vestibular system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1952; 61:987-116. 5. Brandt T, Daroff RB. Physical therapy for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Arch Otolaryngol. 198;16:484-485. 6. Schuknecht HF. Cupulolithiasis. Arch Otolaryngol. 1969;9:765-778. 7. Parnes LS, McClure JA. Free-floating endolymph particles: a new operative finding during posterior semicircular canal occlusion. Laryngoscope. 1992;12:988-992. 8. Brandt T, Steddin S. Current view of the mechanism of benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo: cupulolithiasis or canalolithiasis? J Vestib Res. 1993;3:373-382. 9. Baloh RW, Honrubia V, Jacobson K. Benign positional vertigo: clinical and oculographic features in 24 cases. Neurology. 1987;37:371-378. 1. Blessing R, Strutz J, Beck C. Epidemiology of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo [in German]. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1986;65:455-458. 11. Gyo K. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo as a complication of postoperative bedrest. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:332-333. 12. Hughes CA, Proctor L. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope. 1997; 17:67-613. 13. Katsarkas A, Kirkham TH. Paroxysmal positional vertigo: a study of 255 cases. J Otolaryngol. 1978;7:32-33. 14. Ishiyama A, Jacobson KM, Baloh RW. Migraine and benign positional vertigo. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2;19:377-38. 15. Keim RJ, Sachs GB. Positional nystagmus in association with macroglobulinemia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1975;84:223-227. 16. Serafini G, Palmieri AMR, Simoncelli C. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of posterior semicircular canal: results in 16 cases treated with Semont s maneuver. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;15:77-775. 17. Spector M. Positional vertigo after stapedectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1961; 7:251-254. 18. Norre ME, Beckers A. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in the elderly: treatment by habituation exercises. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988;36:425-429. 19. Semont A, Freyss G, Vitte E. Curing the BPPV with a liberatory maneuver. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1988;42:29-293. 2. Epley JM. The canalith repositioning procedure: for treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;17:399-44. 21. Cohen HS, Jerabek J. Efficacy of treatments for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope. 1999;19:584-59. 22. Harvey SA, Hain TC, Adamiec LC. Modified liberatory maneuver: effective treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope. 1994;14:126-1212. 23. Herdman SJ, Tusa RJ, Zee DS, Proctor LR, Mattox DE. Single treatment approaches to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:45-454. 24. Nunez RA, Cass SP, Furman JM. Short- and long-term outcomes of canalith repositioning for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2;122:647-652. 25. Parnes LS, Price-Jones RG. Particle repositioning maneuver for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993;12:325-331. 26. Welling DB, Barnes DE. Particle repositioning maneuver for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope. 1994;14:946-949. 27. Wolf JS, Boyev KP, Manokey BJ, Mattox DE. Success of the modified Epley maneuver in treating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope. 1999; 19:9-93. 28. Brandt T, Steddin S, Daroff RB. Therapy for benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo, revisited. Neurology. 1994;44:796-8. 29. Katsarkas A. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV): idiopathic versus posttraumatic. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119:745-749. 633