Sensitive and specific Modified Hodge Test for KPC and metallo-beta-lactamase

Similar documents
Screening and detection of carbapenemases

suspected KPC and other carbapenemase producers among species of Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas (INEI)- ANLIS Dr. Carlos G.

Received 31 January 2011/Returned for modification 2 March 2011/Accepted 15 March 2011

Original Article Clinical Microbiology

Detection of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriacae from Clinical Isolates

Insert for Kit 98006/98010/ KPC/Metallo-B-Lactamase Confirm Kit KPC+MBL detection Kit KPC/MBL and OXA-48 Confirm Kit REVISION: DBV0034J

#Corresponding author: Pathology Department, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College. Road, Academia, Level 7, Diagnostics Tower, , Singapore

NONFERMENTING GRAM NEGATIVE RODS. April Abbott Deaconess Health System Evansville, IN

Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas spp.

Fernando Pasteran, Tania Mendez, Melina Rapoport, Leonor Guerriero, and Alejandra Corso*

Combined disk methods for the detection of KPC- and/or VIM-positive. Klebsiella pneumoniae: improving reliability for the double carbapenemase

Controlling the false positive results of the Hodge and Masuda assays for class A. carbapenemase detection in species of Enterobacteriaceae

K. Lee, Y. S. Lim, D. Yong, J. H. Yum, and Y. Chong*

Discussion points CLSI M100 S19 Update. #1 format of tables has changed. #2 non susceptible category

In-House Standardization of Carba NP Test for Carbapenemase Detection in Gram Negative Bacteria

Differentiation of Carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae by Triple disc Test

Phenotypic Detection Methods of Carbapenemase Production in Enterobacteriaceae

Detection of SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CHDL-producing. Acinetobacter baumannii using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry

MHSAL Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Antimicrobial Resistant Organisms (AROs) - Response to Questions

Nature and Science 2017;15(10)

Guideline for phenotypic screening and confirmation of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae

Sensitive Screening Tests for Suspected Class A Carbapenemase Production in Species of Enterobacteriaceae

Carbapenem Disks on MacConkey agar as screening methods for the detection of. Carbapenem-Resistant Gram negative rods in stools.

on July 8, 2018 by guest

Educational Workshops 2016

Detecting CRE. what does one need to do?

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Julie Creighton and Clare Tibbs. Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch

ALERT. Clinical microbiology considerations related to the emergence of. New Delhi metallo beta lactamases (NDM 1) and Klebsiella

Guidance on screening and confirmation of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriacae (CRE) December 12, 2011

Detecting carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae

False susceptibility of antibitoics to carbapenemase producers and means to overcome

Phenotypic detection of ESBLs and carbapenemases

Evaluation of Six Phenotypic Methods for the Detection of Carbapenemases in Gram-Negative Bacteria With Characterized Resistance Mechanisms

Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures

Comparison of phenotypic methods for the detection of carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae

SSRG International Journal of Medical Science (SSRG-IJMS) volume 2 Issue 4 April 2015

Carbapenems and Enterobacteriaceae

Detecting Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: why isn t there a single best method?

Detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: a challenge for diagnostic microbiological laboratories

Surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae pathogens isolated from intensive care units and surgical units in Russia

Received 17 April 2007/Returned for modification 22 January 2008/Accepted 28 February 2008

Carbapenemases: A Review

Journal of Infectious Diseases and

Detection of NDM-1, VIM-1, KPC, OXA-48, and OXA-162 carbapenemases by MALDI- TOF mass spectrometry

Affinity of Doripenem and Comparators to Penicillin-Binding Proteins in Escherichia coli and ACCEPTED

Research Article PhenotypicDetectionofMetallo-β-Lactamase in Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Prevalence of Extended Spectrum -Lactamases In E.coli and Klebsiella spp. in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Enterobacteriaceae and glucose non-fermenting Gram-negative rods by. immunochromatography assay

Determining the Optimal Carbapenem MIC that Distinguishes Carbapenemase-Producing

EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR AMPC β-lactamase IN GRAM NEGATIVE CLINICAL ISOLATES FROM TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS

2612 Page. *Yusuf, I 1., Rabiu A.T 1., Haruna, M 2. and Abdullahi, S. A 3. Phone:

Received 30 March 2005; returned 16 June 2005; revised 8 September 2005; accepted 12 September 2005

β CARBA Test Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains Contents 1. INTENDED USE

Supplementary Material Hofko M et al., Detection of carbapenemases by real-time PCR and melt-curve analysis on the BD MAX TM System

Laboratory CLSI M100-S18 update. Paul D. Fey, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Associate Director Josh Rowland, M.T. (ASCP) State Training Coordinator

Consultation on the Revision of Carbapenem Breakpoints

AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 13 October 2008 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi: /aac

ARTICLE IN PRESS International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents xxx (2010) xxx xxx

Sensitivity of Surveillance Testing for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in the

Standardisation of testing for Carbapenemase Producing Organisms (CPO) in Scotland

Use of Faropenem as an Indicator of Carbapenemase Activity

Activity of tigecycline alone and in combination with colistin and meropenem against carbapenemase

North Carolina CRE Laboratory Task Force

Revised AAC Version 2» New-Data Letter to the Editor ACCEPTED. Plasmid-Mediated Carbapenem-Hydrolyzing β-lactamase KPC-2 in

Methodological and interpretative problems in antimicrobial susceptiblity tests of P. aeruginosa

ACCEPTED. Comparison of disk diffusion and agar dilution methods for erythromycin and

Update on CLSI and EUCAST

EUCAST Frequently Asked Questions. by author. Rafael Cantón Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain EUCAST Clinical Data Coordinator

Methods for colistin testing What works and what does not? Erika Matuschek, Ph D EUCAST Development Laboratory, EDL

Recommendations for the Management of Carbapenem- Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in Acute and Long-term Acute Care Hospitals

Identification and screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Acquired carbapenemases in Gram-negative bacterial pathogens: detection and surveillance issues

Evaluation of CHROMagar msupercarba for the detection of carbapenemaseproducing Gram-negative organisms

A Snapshot of Colistin Use in South-East Europe and Particularly in Greece

International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: Volume 7 Number 01 (2018) Journal homepage:

Reporting blood culture results to clinicians: MIC, resistance mechanisms, both?

Incidence of metallo beta lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in ICU patients

In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Isolates. in a Phase 3 Open-label Clinical Trial for Complicated

Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Odor Eliminating Compounds

Steven D. Brown* and Maria M. Traczewski. The Clinical Microbiology Institute, 9725 SW Commerce Circle, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Enterobacteriaceae with acquired carbapenemases, 2016

Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 with KPC-2 in Hong Kong. Title. Ho, PL; Tse, CWS; Lai, EL; Lo, WU; Chow, KH

Laboratory testing for carbapenems resistant Enterobacteriacae (CRE)

KPC around the world Maria Virginia Villegas, MD, MSC

CARBAPENEMASE PRODUCING ENTEROBACTERIACEAE

ST11 KPC-2 Klebsiella pneumoniae detected in Taiwan

hydrophila strain ACCEPTED *Corresponding author. Department of Bacteriology, National Center for Epidemiology, 1097

New Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance and Methods for Carbapenemase Detection

(Plasmid mediated) Carbapenemases. Timothy R. Walsh, Cardiff University, Wales

Evaluation of Modified Hodge Test as a Non-molecular Assay for Accurate Detection of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Giuseppe Valenza*, Biju Joseph*, Johannes Elias, Heike Claus, Anett Oesterlein, Kathrin

Activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against a Broad Spectrum of Recent Clinical Anaerobic Isolates

Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan

Comparision of Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing As Per CLSI and Eucast Guidelines for Gram Negative Bacilli

Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: Prof P. Nordmann Bicêtre hospital, South-Paris Med School

The role of an AMR reference laboratory

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Multi-clonal origin of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates. determined by multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis

Transcription:

JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 19 October 2011 J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/jcm.05602-11 Copyright 2011, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved. 1 2 3 Sensitive and specific Modified Hodge Test for KPC and metallo-beta-lactamase detection in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by use of a novel indicator strain: Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Running Title: Modified Hodge Test for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Authors: Fernando Pasteran, Omar Veliz, Melina Rapoport, Leonor Guerriero and Alejandra Corso Author s affiliation: Servicio Antimicrobianos, Departamento Bacteriología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas (INEI)- ANLIS Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán, Ministerio de Salud y Ambiente, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Address of the Institution at which the work was performed: Servicio Antimicrobianos, INEI-ANLIS Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán, Av. Velez Sarsfield 563 (C1282AFF), Buenos Aires, Argentina. Corresponding author: Alejandra Corso Address: Servicio Antimicrobianos, INEI - ANLIS Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán, Velez Sarsfield 563 Ave. (C1282AFF), Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: acorso@anlis.gov.ar Phone/FAX: 54-11-4303-2812. Abstract length: 63 words Paper length: 1294 words 20

21 ABSTRACT 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 We evaluated the ability of the Modified Hodge Test to discriminate between KPC- or MBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and carbapenemase nonproducers. Using Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 indicator strain the MHT resulted in low sensitivity, specificity and repeatability. Replacing the indicator strain by Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 led to an improved performance (100%, 97%, 0% and 100% sensitivity, specificity, indeterminate results and repeatability, respectively). Keywords: Hodge test, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, carbapenemase, KPC, MBL Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on December 12, 2018 by guest

29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Detection of carbapenemase producers in the clinical laboratory is of major importance for the determination of appropriate therapeutic schemes and the implementation of infection control measures (1,5). The Modified Hodge test (MHT) has been widely used for carbapenemase screening by routine labs because it analyzes directly the carbapenemase activity of a tested strain. Given its simplicity, the CLSI published a recommendation in which Enterobacteriaceae with elevated carbapenem MICs or reduced disk diffusion inhibition zones should be tested for the production of carbapenemases by means of the MHT (2). However, these recommendations do not include Pseudomonas aeruginosa where acquired carbapenemases are constantly emerging with increasing prevalence. Only two reports addressed the usefulness of the MHT using P. aeruginosa isolates of known genotype as the gold standard (4, 6). Using the methodological standardization for Enterobacteriaceae, we reported that the background-lawn formation by E. coli ATCC 25922 was inhibited by large proportion of the tested strains, defined as an equivocal or indeterminate result (6). Similar results were observed in the report of Lee K. et al. (4). It is clear then, that the traditional MHT needs to be redefined for its use in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, finding the optimum test conditions to ensure a higher performance. On the other hand, several inhibitor-based tests have been developed for the detection of carbapenemases in P. aeruginosa (5, 6). However, misdetection of newly emerging isolates with a combination of carbapenemases (3) could occur with these methods. Thus, other phenotypic methods such as the MHT are needed to complement these inhibitor-based tests. 51 52 53 Here we optimized the MHT for a more accurate and reliable detection of carbapenemase production in P. aeruginosa by using a novel indicator strain, K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603, named as P. aeruginosa MHT (PAE-MHT).

54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 Selection of the optimal indicator strain. The main limitation of the MHT for carbapenemase screening in P. aeruginosa was the inhibition of growth of the indicator strain by the tested clinical isolate. Therefore, we first evaluated the performance of five different putative indicator strains: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, E. coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603. For this purpose, the MHT was challenged with a panel of 64 P. aeruginosa isolates: carbapenemase producers (n=42) [KPC (n=20), VIM-like (n=6), IMP-13 (n=3), VIM-11 (n=3), SPM-1 (n=3), VIM-2 (n=3), IMP-16 (n=2), IMPlike (n=2)], and carbapenemase nonproducers (n=22). The strains were part of a previous work where they were characterized (6). The isolates were from clinical source and they were single isolates from each patient. The MHT was performed as previously described (2,4). Briefly, an 1/10 dilution of an inoculum of the indicator organisms, adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard, were used to inoculate the surface of plates (diameter, 100 mm) of Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco, Becton-Dickinson) by swabbing. After the plates were allowed to stand for 10 min at room temperature, one disk with meropenem (10 μg, Difco, Becton-Dickinson) was placed onto the agar plates. Subsequently, by use of a 10 µl loop, three to five colonies of the test organisms, grown overnight on an agar plate, were inoculated onto the plate in a straight line from the edge of the disk to the periphery of the plate. The presence of growth of the indicator strain towards a meropenem disk was interpreted as a positive result for carbapenem hydrolysis (carbapenemase pattern). Carbapenemase producers were not detected with S. aureus ATCC 25923 and E. faecalis ATCC 29212 indicator strains (Table 1). Both indicators, E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 produced indeterminate results in 32% and 35% of the strains, respectively, leading to an unacceptable performance (Table 1). The occurrence

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 of indeterminate results was not observed among KPC producers. Conversely, indeterminate results were observed for MBLs producers (12 and 14% with E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, respectively) and carbapenemase nonproducers (45% and 80% with E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, respectively). The PAE-MHT demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity for detection of carbapenemase activity without indeterminate results (Table 1). Figure 1 shows indeterminate results for a VIM-producer isolate with E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 indicator strains but these results were reverted when using the PAE-MHT. Repeatability. To investigate whether the PAE-MHT could provide consistent results, we assessed the repeatability (i.e. the variation in measurement obtained by a single person under the same conditions) by performing the test for five consecutive days. For this purpose we tested 15 strains (10 carbapenemase producers and 5 nonproducers).the performance of PAE-MHT was compared to that of the traditional MHT. Surprisingly, we observed that using E. coli ATCC 25922 as indicator strain, 9 out of 15 tests strains showed variable results over the tested time (repeatability 40%) as follows: i) 3 carbapenemase producers (SPM-1, IMP-16 and one carbapenem-susceptible IMP-13) gave positive and indeterminate results; ii) 3 carbapenemase nonproducers (CTX-M-2, efflux overproducer and efflux plus AmpC overproducer) alternated between indeterminate and negative results; and iii) 3 carbapenemase producers (IMP-13, GES-5 and one carbapenem-susceptible VIM-11) alternated positive, indeterminate but also false negative results. In contrast, with the PAE-MHT all tested strains showed the same expected results on the day-to-day repetitions (repeatability 100%). 102 103 Challenge of the PAE-MHT. Finally, we challenged the PAE-MHT with an extended panel of 173 characterized P. aeruginosa clinical isolates: carbapenemase producers

104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 (n=99) [IMP-like (n=41), KPC (n=25), VIM-like (n=14), SPM-1 (n=7), IMP-13 (n=6), VIM-2 (n=4), VIM-11 (n=4), IMP-16 (n=2), GES-5 (n=2)] and carbapenemase nonproducers (n=74). The panel of strains was chosen to include major carbapenem resistance mechanisms, in particular, carbapenemase-producing strains categorized as susceptible according to CLSI standards by both, the disk diffusion and agar dilution methods (2). About 33% and 15% of the IMP- and VIM-producers of this collection, respectively, were carbapenem susceptible. In this large scale trial we corroborated the absence of indeterminate results and obtained similar sensitivity and specificity values as observed in the preliminary study conducted for the optimal selection of the indicator strain. Only two false positive results (2 cephalosporinase overproducer isolates) were obtained. However, these strains were correctly categorized as cephalosporinase overproducers by using an inhibitor-based test (6). Conclusion. The difficulty to detect carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa, together with their potential to disseminate, highlights the need for an easy, sensitive and accurate screening method. The MHT displayed high rate of indeterminate results, even when applying standardized conditions for Enterobacteriaceae (4). In addition, we obtained low consisting results when using E. coli ATCC 25922 and other reports did not performed repeatability studies (4, 6). In contrast, the PAE-MHT using K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 indicator strain eliminated the incidence of indeterminate result. In addition, the PAE-MHT resulted with high repeatability and optimal sensitivity and specificity. Our study demonstrates that the PAE-MHT is able to detect currently circulating carbapenemase-producing strains, including those susceptible to carbapenems, becoming a key diagnostic tool for routine laboratories, especially for those where inhibitor-based tests are not available. In this scenario, we recommended to screen with

129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 the PAE-MHT all ceftazidime resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa with meropenem halos 23 mm or MIC 1 µg/ml, an epidemiological breakpoint that suggests carbapenemase production (6). For those labs where inhibitor-based tests are available, the PAE-MHT can be an ideal complementary method to overcome potential false negative results due to the emergence of new combinations of carbapenemases. Thus, we suggest to test with the PAE-MHT those strains with high level of resistance to meropenem (halo 6 mm, MIC 128 µg/ml) and negative results with class A (3-aminophenyl-boronic acid) and class B (EDTA, dipicolinic acid, etc) inhibitors. In conclusion, the PAE-MHT with the use of K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 as indicator strain will enable routine labs to identify P. aeruginosa isolates suspected of producing carbapenemases, including some of the most important epidemiological challenges of recent times, as the KPCs and carbapenem-susceptible MBLs. Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on December 12, 2018 by guest

142 References: 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 1. Carmeli Y., M. Akova, G. Cornaglia, G.L. Daikos, J. Garau, S. Harbarth, G.M. Rossolini, M. Souli and H. Giamarellou. 2010. Controlling the spread of carbapenemase-producing gram-negatives: therapeutic approach and infection control. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16:102 11. 2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2011. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 19th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S21. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 3. Correa A., M. C. Montealegre, M. F. Mojica, S. J. Ruiz, J. J. Maya, E. P. De La Cadena, F. Rosso, M. Recalde, J. P. Quinn and M. V. Villegas. 2011. Abstr. 51st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C1-1214 4. Lee K., Y. Chong, H.B. Shin, Y.A. Kim, D. Yong and J.H. Yum. 2001. Modified Hodge and EDTA-disk synergy tests to screen metallo-beta-lactamaseproducing strains of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 7:88-91. 5. Miriagou V., G. Cornaglia, M. Edelstein, I. Galani, C.G. Giske, M. Gniadkowski, E. Malamou-Lada, L. Martinez-Martinez, F. Navarro, P. Nordmann, L. Peixe, S. Pournaras, G.M. Rossolini, A. Tsakris, A. Vatopoulos and R. Cantón. 2010. Acquired carbapenemases in gram-negative bacterial pathogens: detection and surveillance issues. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16:112 22. 6. Pasteran F., O. Veliz, D. Faccone, L. Guerriero, M. Rapoport, T. Mendez and A. Corso. 2011. A simple test for the detection of KPC and metallo-βlactamase carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with the use of meropenem disks supplemented with aminophenylboronic acid,

167 168 dipicolinic acid and cloxacillin. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03585.x. 169

170 171 172 Table 1. Sensitivity, specificity and indeterminate results of the Modified Hodge Test for the detection of carbapenemase production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained with the different indicator strains No. of tested Percentage of 173 174 strains Sensitivity Specificity Indeterminate i) Selection of the optimal indicator strain S. aureus ATCC 25923 64 0 100 0 E. faecalis ATCC 29212 64 0 100 0 E. coli ATCC 25922 64 78 57 32 P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 64 88 15 35 K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 64 100 98 0 ii) Challenge of the selected indicator strain K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 173 100 97 0

175 176 177 178 179 180 181 FIGURE LEGEND Figure 1. Results of the Modified Hodge Test (MHT) for a representative VIMproducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate. Comparative performance using Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 indicator strains. The final interpretation of the MHT is shown below each strain. Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on December 12, 2018 by guest

182 Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on December 12, 2018 by guest