CBP 2014 1 Cosun Sepawa Nordic, May 5 th 2014 Francesco Staps, Business Development Manager
CBP 2014 2 Royal Cosun: facts and figures Processing of agricultural raw materials into: Food ingredients Feed products Non-food products Since 1899 Cooperative firm: 9,500 members 3,400 FTE 2.2 billion euro turn over (2013) Approx. 25 processing plants Approx. 9 million ton/year input
CBP 2014 3 Cosun biobased focus High value products Biorefinery for 100% crop utilization Preferably existing crops and side streams + Energy Complex molecules from plants Extraction and purification technology Long term vision & commitment Pilot plant facilities (research & regular production) In-house R&D group Investment!! Strategic partnerships
CBP 2014 4 Examples of biobased products: Existing business: Starch derivatives il & Gas drilling Paper & Cardboard Soil topping for horticulture Bio-methane Bio-ethanol Fertilizer Fermentables for chemicals Inulin derivatives Carboxymethyl inulin Cationic inulin New business: Special sugars Food Cosmetics Chemical building blocks Polymers / resins Micro-fibres Rheology modifier Reinforcement Plasticizers Waste to chemicals New crops for chemicals
CBP 2014 5 Cosun Carboxyline CMI a proven biobased ingredient for detergents & cleaners
CBP 2014 6 Agenda Environmental profile & labeling Versatility and test data Cost effectiveness
CBP 2014 7 Carboxyline CMI a versatile scale inhibitor CMI = Carboxy Methyl Inulin Inulin is derived from chicory roots (plant reserve) Inorganic scale prevention protecting heating element, anti-incrustation, anti-filming and spotting Highly compatible (ease of formulation) CH 2 H H H H HCH 2 H CH 2 - CH 2 C 2 Na + n - CH 2 CH 2 C 2 Na + H CH 2 H H Anti redepostion Synergies with chelants, builders and polymers
CBP 2014 8 Environmental profile and labeling CH 2 H H H HCH 2 H H CH 2 - CH 2 C 2 Na + - CH 2 CH 2 C 2 Na + H n H CH 2 H
CBP 2014 9 Biodegradability & Safety Carboxyline CMI is inherently biodegradable ECS 302A (SCAS test): >20% biodegradation in 24 hours ECD 306: >20% biodegradation in 28 days Carboxyline CMI has very low aquatic toxicity rganism Parameter [CMI] (mg/l) Bacteria EC 10 >10,000 Daphnia EC 0 2,000 EC 50, 24h 5,500 Fish LC 0 >10,000 Carboxyline CMI is safe Non-toxic: LD50 > 2000 mg/kg Easy handling, no labeling
CBP 2014 10 Labeling Products can apply for and can carry labels like Nordic Swan / Ecolabel As an ingredient, Carboxyline CMI is used in formulations carrying these labels Carboxyline CMI is not on the A-part of the DID list. Calculation formats are available upon request. N.B. Carboxyline CMI carries KIWA and NSF labels for the production of potable water by R. Concentrate streams containing CMI may qualify for being discharged directly to surface waters (incl. North Sea).
CBP 2014 11 Versatility and test data CH 2 H H H HCH 2 H H CH 2 - CH 2 C 2 Na + - CH 2 CH 2 C 2 Na + H n H CH 2 H
CBP 2014 12 The 3 basic properties of Carboxyline CMI Crystal growth inhibition 2 Sequestering of free-ions 1 Dispersant CMI = moderate/ selective CMI = excellent CMI = very good 3
Turbiscan Stability Index CBP 2014 13 Dispersing properties Turbiscan results; conditions: 2% Kaolin, dosage 10 ppm antiscalant 40 Blanc 30 20 HEDP DTPMPA Carboxyline 25 10 Carboxyline 25-40 UP 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (minutes) Polyacrylate (Mw=8000)
CBP 2014 14 Carboxyline CMI shows excellent compatibility with a broad range of surfactants Surfactant (20% active) ambient temp 2% Polyacrylate (homopolymer) 2% Carboxy Methyl Inulin Sodium salt of Dodecyl Benzene Sulfonate + + Triethanolamine salt of Dodecyl Benzene Sulfonate + + Cocoamidopropyl betaine + + Sodium Laureth Sulfonate (SLES) +/- + Sodium Lauryl Sulfonate (SLS) + + Coconut soap + Alkyl polyglucoside + + Sodium Lauroyl Sarcosinate + Alcohol Ethoxylate 91-6 type + + Sodium Methyl 2 Sulfolaurate/ Disodium 2-Sulfolaurate +/- +
CBP 2014 15 Synergy with other ingredients CMI + green chelants (e.g. MGDA, GLDA, EDDS) Longer induction time Less chemicals required CMI + citrate Improved scale inhibition CMI + polyacrylate Improved scale inhibition CMI + entire formulation Improved calcium tolerance of entire formulation Solubility and fast dissolving
CaC3 inhibition (%) CBP 2014 16 Synergy Carboxyline 20 + citrate as a costeffective alternative CaC 3 scale inhibition Conditions: LSI 2.51 (approx. 200 ppm Ca); ph 8.5; 50 C; 22h 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Carboxyline 20 Carboxyline 20 + 25 ppm citrate 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Inhibitor dosage (ppm)
Scale inhibition (%) CBP 2014 17 Carboxyline 25 + polyacrylate CaC 3 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Blend 75% CMI + 25% PA 100% Carboxyline 25 100% PA (avg Mw=8,000) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Active inhibitor (ppm) Conditions ph=10 T=60 C (140 F) t=1 h 20 dh (350 ppm hardness)
CBP 2014 18 Carboxyline CMI + green builder(s) CaC 3 scale inhibition Builders tested: MGDA, EDDS, GLDA Conditions: ph 10, T=60 C (140 F), 25 dh (450 ppm hardness) Without CMI present: With CMI present: (15% on top of builder) Builder (ppm) t=0h t=1h t=2h t=3h Builder + CMI (ppm) t=0h t=1h t=2h t=3h 1500 + + + + 1250 + + 1500 + 225 + + + + 1250 + 188 + + + + 1000 + - - - 1000 + 150 + + + + 750 + - - - 750 + 113 + + + + + = no scale formation ± = some scale formation - = scale formation
CBP 2014 19 Results laundry detergent application tests Equipment: Whirlpool Duet front load (HE) washer Applied method: ASTM D4265-98 and ASTM E 97 Program: regular setting, medium load, warm wash (42 C) with cold rinse Water hardness: 17 dh Ballast sheets: 4 cotton + 4 poly-cotton Measurement: colorimeter with UV filter
CBP 2014 20 The 5 aspects of laundry functionality Stain removal ther functionalities: Softening & dewatering Prevention Scale Formation (heating element and anti-incrustation) + Storage stability + Dissolving quickly + Fragrance (anti malodeur) Anti redepostion Material Care
CBP 2014 21 Test results comparison CMI and PA Ref. w/cmi w/pa Water 74.3 71.3 71.3 Sodium dodecylbenzene sulphonate 10.0 10.0 10.0 SLES 7.2 7.2 7.2 E7 (nonionic) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Potassium oleate 1.0 1.0 1.0 Propylene glycol 2.0 2.0 2.0 Calcium chloride 0.1 0.1 0.1 Carboxyline 25-40 D (40% active) - 3.0 - Polyacrylate (45% active) - - 3.0 Enzymes 0.4 0.4 0.4 3,0 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0-0,5-1,0 w/cmi w/pa Difference in Delta E Ref. w/cmi w/pa Delta E total 80.89 85.75 83.16
CBP 2014 22 Laundry enzyme stabilization Carboxyline CMI Enzyme Termamyl 300 L Dosage 0.25 wt%
CBP 2014 23 Conclusions CMI for laundry detergents The use of Carboxyline CMI over no polymer improves tomato/beef, EMPA 116, cacao, blood and ground in clay stain removal Carboxyline CMI is compatible with enzymes Carboxyline CMI is highly compatible with surfactants
CBP 2014 24 Cost effectiveness CH 2 H H H HCH 2 H H CH 2 - CH 2 C 2 Na + - CH 2 CH 2 C 2 Na + H n H CH 2 H
CBP 2014 25 A practical case: Based upon the 5 aspects of ADW functionality Cleaning Performance ther functionalities: Drying Performance Prevention Scale Formation + Storage stability + Tablet properties + Dissolving quickly + Fragrance (anti malodeur) Rinse Aid Action Material Care Working on 1 aspect, will have an impact on other aspects!
CBP 2014 26 What makes CMI interesting as an ingredient? Green & multi functional molecule experience has learned that CMI is NT A DRP IN! Synergies with other actives nce used for 1 particular aspect the multi functionality & synergy is a bonus on other aspects No negative impact on other aspects AND HW IS ALL F THIS T BE TRANSLATED INT REAL, CST EFFECTIVE FRMULATINS??
CBP 2014 27 Results in-house ADW cost effectiveness test Equipment: 4x Miele GSL 1222 Labor machines Applied method: Rinse aid test Program: normal 50 C Water hardness: 21 GH Ballast soil: 100 g RA-mix No of cycles: 6 Judgement: visual spotting and filming
CBP 2014 28 Goal of the experiment Demonstrate cost-effectiveness of Carboxyline CMI Definition of cost-effectiveness Demonstrate equivalent performance at lower relative cost AND/R Demonstrate improved performance at equivalent relative cost Starting point: The relative cost of a formulation based upon ingredient cost
Commercial tablet (STPP based) CBP 2014 29 Test formulations A B C D* Reference Classification** #4 #2 #3 #2 #2 Sodium citrate 40 16 33 24-30 Sodium carbonate 30 30 30 26-30 Sodium percarbonate 10 10 10 10 MGDA (78% active) - 25 5 4-6 Acrylic polymers (90% active) 10 10 9 8-12 Carboxyline 25 D Powder (45% active) - - 4 4-8 TAED 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Surfactants 4 4 4 4-5 Enzymes 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Sodium sulfate q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. Relative cost price 0.73 1.00 0.93 0.93-1.07 unknown verall performance (see next slide) poor-fair good good very good fair-good *The performance of formulation C can be further improved by adjusting the amount of polymers and/or surfactants. Guideline formulation D is the result of that.
1,9 1,7 1,7 2,3 2,0 2,3 2,2 3,1 3,3 3,5 3,0 3,0 3,3 3,3 3,2 3,0 3,2 3,5 4,0 3,7 4,2 4,0 5,0 4,7 4,4 1,5 2,3 3,1 3,2 3,4 3,5 4,1 3,9 4,3 4,0 4,9 5,0 5,3 4,9 5,2 5,6 6,0 5,8 5,9 7,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 CBP 2014 30 Results RA test 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Average score on Spotting after 6 washes glass plastic ceramics knives average A B C D reference Average score on Filming after 6 washes glass plastic ceramics knives average A B C D reference Explanation of the scores in ADW rinse aid test 0-2 = poor; 2-4 = fair; 4-6 = good; 6-8 = excellent Examples spotting poor fair good excellent Examples filming poor fair good excellent
CBP 2014 31 Effect of CMI on Tupperware Starting point = formulation D Anti-filming test (6 cycles) dosage Carboxyline 25 D Powder 8.0% 5.3% 2.7% 0% utcome: CMI surpresses the film build-up on Tupperware
CBP 2014 32 Conclusion Different dosage, different functionality Performance additive Dosage level <3% Improve cleaning performance Co-builder Dosage level 2-8% Synergy Scale inhibition Glass corrosion prevention weak chelant Compatibility with surfactants (liquid laundry) Stain removal enzyme compatibility Anti-redeposition Anti-incrustation
CBP 2014 33 Wrap up: Business opportunities with Carboxyline CMI as cost effective ingredient Cleaning & Care Cost effective formulations Low temperature performance Highly compatible Benefits from synergetic effects Formulability Sustainability & legislation Cost Market trends towards green, biobased, etc. Price development of CMI is level par over years and trending downwards
CBP 2014 34 Example of ADW tabs with CMI No. 1 tabs in European consumer tests on cost performance Germany Netherlands Spain Portugal Italy
CBP 2014 35 ther examples Minirisk Denmark Nordic Swan Rainbow Finland Nordic Swan L Arbre Vert France Ecolabel
CBP 2014 36 ah The Netherlands Nordic Ecolabel Ecover North America Winni s - Italy
CBP 2014 37 Biobased products from plant to plant - Thank you for your attention www.cosunbiobased.com francesco.staps@cosun.com