R/R DLBCL Treatment Landscape

Similar documents
CAR-T cell therapy pros and cons

CAR T-Cell Therapy for Lymphoma: Assessing Long-Term Durability. Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA

Objectives. Emily Whitehead 10/11/2018. Chimeric Antigen Recepetor T-Cells (CAR-T) CAR-T Therapy: The Past, The Present, and The Future

Background. Outcomes in refractory large B-cell lymphoma with traditional standard of care are extremely poor 1

CAR-T Therapy: The Past, The Present, and The Future. Nilay Shah, MD Michael Chargualaf, PharmD, BCOP WVU Medicine Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center

State of the art: CAR-T cell therapy in lymphoma

CAR T CELL IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR ALL. Stephan Grupp, MD, PhD

MMAE disrupts cell division and triggers apoptosis. Pola binds to cell surface antigen CD79b. Pola is internalized; linker cleaves, releasing MMAE

Exploiting the Immune System: Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies

Sunita D Nasta MD FACP Associate Prof of Clinical Med January 26, 2018

Aggressive lymphomas ASH Dr. A. Van Hoof A.Z. St.Jan, Brugge-Oostende AV

Chimeric Antigen Receptor - CAR T cell therapy. Frederick L. Locke, MD 2/17/2017

Strategies for the Treatment of Elderly DLBCL Patients, New Combination Therapy in NHL, and Maintenance Rituximab Therapy in FL

Chimeric An+gen Receptor (CAR) Modified T Cell Therapy: Mee#ng the Unmet Need in Follicular Lymphoma

Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Indolent and Mantle-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Immunocellular Therapies for Relapsed/ Refractory Heme Malignancies: A Focus on CAR T-Cell Therapy

What are the hurdles to using cell of origin in classification to treat DLBCL?

Have we moved beyond EPOCH for B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma? YES!

Engineering an Immunity to Cancer: A New Era of Adoptive Cellular Therapy with Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) in Pediatric ALL

OSCO/OU ASH-SABC Review. Lymphoma Update. Mohamad Cherry, MD

Management of high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphoma: case presentation

Update: Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma

Kymriah. Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) Description

DYNAMO: A PHASE 2 STUDY OF DUVELISIB IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY INDOLENT NON HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

Abstract 861. Stein AS, Topp MS, Kantarjian H, Gökbuget N, Bargou R, Litzow M, Rambaldi A, Ribera J-M, Zhang A, Zimmerman Z, Forman SJ

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Genomics in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not as useful as we thought. OR IS IT?

Bendamustine for Hodgkin lymphoma. Alison Moskowitz, MD Assistant Attending Memorial Sloan Kettering, Lymphoma Service

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Kamakshi V Rao, PharmD, BCOP, FASHP University of North Carolina Medical Center UPDATE IN REFRACTORY HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

Rituximab in the Treatment of NHL:

Treating for Cure or Palliation: Difficult Decisions for Older Adults with Lymphoma

CAR-T CELLS: NEW HOPE FOR CANCER PATIENTS

Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Disclosures for Dr. Peter Borchmann 48 th ASH Annual meeting, Orlando, Florida

New Targets and Treatments for Follicular Lymphoma

Bendamustine is Effective Therapy in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS): Cytokine release syndrome and neurological toxicities

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 8 November 2006

The treatment of DLBCL. Michele Ghielmini Medical Oncology Dept Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona

FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA: US vs. Europe: different approach on first relapse setting?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma. Catherine Hildyard Haematology Senior Registrar Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Targeted Radioimmunotherapy for Lymphoma

CAR T-Cell Therapy for Your Patients: What You Need To Know

Firenze, settembre 2017 Novità dall EHA LINFOMI Umberto Vitolo

Bendamustine for relapsed follicular lymphoma refractory to rituximab

ESMO DOUBLE-HIT LYMPHOMAS

How to Integrate the New Drugs into the Management of Multiple Myeloma

CARE at ASH 2014 Lymphoma. Dr. Diego Villa Medical Oncologist British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver Cancer Centre

Supplementary Appendix to manuscript submitted by Trappe, R.U. et al:

eastern cooperative oncology group Michael Williams, Fangxin Hong, Brad Kahl, Randy Gascoyne, Lynne Wagner, John Krauss, Sandra Horning

YESCARTA (axicabtagene ciloleucel)

Estimand and analysis considerations of phase 3 clinical trials involving CAR-T A case study in lymphoma

Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR)

ASCO Analyst & Investor Webcast. June 1, 2018

POST ICML Indolent lymphomas relapse treatment

Highlights in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma From the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting

CAR T-Cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Identifying Appropriate Patients and Maximizing Outcomes. Shannon L.

Highlights of ICML 2015

Aggressive B and T cell lymphomas: Treatment paradigms in 2018

Tisagenlecleucel for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Project Protocol, Clinical Section

Disclosures WOJCIECH JURCZAK

Immuntherapie maligner Lymphome. Mathias Witzens-Harig Medizinische Klinik V Universität Heidelberg

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Front line Therapy John P. Leonard, MD Weill Cornell Medicine New York, New York USA

Jonathan W Friedberg, MD, MMSc

Mantle Cell Lymphoma. A schizophrenic disease

Radiotherapy in DLCL is often worthwhile. Dr. Joachim Yahalom Memorial Sloan-Kettering, New York

Yescarta. Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel) Description

Emerging targeted therapies for follicular lymphoma A future without chemotherapy

Addition of rituximab is not associated with survival benefit compared with CHOP alone for patients with stage I diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Dr. Nicolas Ketterer CHUV, Lausanne SAMO, May 2009

BR is an established treatment regimen for CLL in the front-line and R/R settings

International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML) June 14-17, 2017

Choice of upfront treatment in the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma

The case for maintenance rituximab in FL

Update: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Updates in the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: ASH Topics

Dr Claire Burney, Lymphoma Clinical Fellow, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, UK

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in ALL. Hagop Kantarjian M.D. May 2016 Bologna, Italy

Open questions in the treatment of Follicular Lymphoma. Prof. Michele Ghielmini Head Medical Oncology Dept Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland

The case against maintenance rituximab in Follicular lymphoma. Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.

Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma. Pro auto. Peter Reimer. Klinik für Hämatologie / intern. Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation

NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells in Synovial Sarcoma

Lymphoma- Med A-new drugs and treatments

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)

B-Cell NHL and Hodgkin s Disease: Biologicals, Checkpoint Inhibitors, CAR-T cells

Managing Patients Undergoing CD19 CAR-T Therapy

Addition of rituximab to the CHOP regimen has no benefit in patients with primary extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Treatment Landscape in R/R DLBCL Novel Targets and Strategies. Wyndham H. Wilson, M.D., Ph.D. Senior Investigator

Mathias J Rummel, MD, PhD

Treatment Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Does the omission of vincristine in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma affect treatment outcome?

Current Strategies for Relapsed/Refractory ALL in AYAs and Adults: Where We Are Now

Is there a role of HDT ASCT as consolidation therapy for first relapse follicular lymphoma in the post Rituximab era? Yes

Donor derived CD19 specific CAR + T cell therapy after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Laurence J.N. Cooper Hyatt Orlando

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: nobody knows what to do...

Applying Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CAR-T) to hematologic malignancies

Adoptive Immunotherapy

Mariano Provencio Servicio de Oncología Médica Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro. Immune checkpoint inhibition in DLBCL

Chemotherapy-based approaches are the optimal second-line therapy prior to stem cell transplant in relapsed HL

Transcription:

An Updated Analysis of JULIET, a Global Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Abstract S799 Borchmann P, Tam CS, Jäger U, McGuirk JP, Holte H, Waller EK, Jaglowski SM, Bishop MR, Andreadis C, Foley SR, Westin JR, Fleury I, Ho PJ, Mielke S, Salles G, Maziarz RT, Anak Ö, Pacaud LB, del Corral C, Awasthi R, Agoulnik S, Tai F, and Schuster SJ

R/R DLBCL Treatment Landscape First-line treatment with immuno-chemotherapy (ie, R-CHOP) is effective 1-3 3-year PFS ~ 75% and 3-year OS ~ 80% Standard of care for R/R DLBCL patients is high-dose chemotherapy followed by auto-sct; however, only a minority actually receive transplant 4 ~50% of patients with R/R disease are ineligible for transplant ~50% of eligible patients respond to salvage chemotherapy and go on to receive transplant Patients refractory to or relapsing after 2 nd -line treatment have a poor prognosis Very low response rates to conventional approaches (CR 8%; PR 18%) 5 Extremely poor OS (median 4.4 mo) 6 auto-sct, autologous stem cell transplant; CR, complete response; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R/R, relapsed/refractory 1. Pfreundschuh M, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(2):105-116. 2. Pfreundschuh M, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(11):1013-1022. 3. Schmitz N, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(12): 1250-1259. 4. Friedberg JW. J Am Soc Hematol Educ Book. 2011;1:498-505. 5. Crump M, et al. Blood. 2017;130(16):1800-1808. 6. Van den Neste E, et al. BMT. 2016;51-57.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Tisagenlecleucel (CTL019) 1-3 First approved CAR T-cell therapy in the United States August 2017: For patients up to 25 years of age with B-cell precursor ALL refractory or in second or later relapse May 2018: For adult patients with R/R DLBCL after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy, based on the phase II JULIET study ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia 1. Milone MC, et al. Mol Ther. 2009;17(8):1453-1464. 2. Zhang H, et al. J Immunol. 2007;179(7):4910-4918. 3. Kalos M, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:95ra73.

JULIET: Only Global CAR T-Cell Trial in DLBCL 27 sites in 10 countries * * * Manufacturing sites

JULIET: Eligibility and Endpoints Updated results of the JULIET study are presented Median follow-up, 14 mo (max, 23 mo) Additional 8 mo of follow-up from the previous presentation (ASH 2017) 1 Key eligibility criteria 18 years of age Central confirmation of histology 2 prior lines of therapy for DLBCL PD after or ineligible for auto-sct No prior anti-cd19 therapy Endpoints Primary endpoint: best overall response rate (ORR: CR + PR) Lugano criteria used for response assessment by IRC 2 Secondary endpoints: DOR, OS, safety No active CNS involvement CNS, central nervous system; DOR, duration of response; IRC, Independent Review Committee; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PD, progressive disease 1. Schuster SJ, et al. Blood. 2017;130: Abstract 577. 2. Cheson BD, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059-3068.

JULIET: Demographics and Baseline Disease Status Patients [N = 111] Age, median (range), years 56 (22-76) 65 years, % 23 ECOG performance status 0/1, % 55/45 Central histology review Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, % 79 Transformed follicular lymphoma, % 19 Double/triple hits in CMYC/BCL2/BCL6 genes, % 17 Cell of origin b Germinal/nongerminal center B-cell type, % 57/41 Number of prior lines of antineoplastic therapy, % 2/3/4-6 44/31/21 IPI 2 at study entry, % 72 Refractory/relapsed to last therapy, % 55/45 Prior auto-sct, % 49 Bridging chemotherapy, n 102 Lymphodepleting chemotherapy, n 103 ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group a CMYC + BCL2, n = 10; CMYC + BCL2 + BCL6, n = 5; CMYC + BCL6, n = 4 b Determined by the Choi algorithm

JULIET: Adverse Events of Special Interest Patients [N = 111] AESI a All Grades, % Grade 3, % Grade 4, % Cytokine release syndrome b 58 14 8 Prolonged cytopenia c 44 16 16 Infections 34 18 2 Febrile neutropenia 15 13 2 a Occurring within 8 weeks of tisagenlecleucel infusion. b Cytokine release syndrome was graded using the Penn scale. c At day 28. No deaths due to tisagenlecleucel, CRS, or cerebral edema The most common neurologic events were Confusional state (8% any grade; 2% grade 3) Encephalopathy (6% any grade; 1% grade 3 and 4% grade 4) AESI, adverse events of special interest; CRS, cytokine release syndrome

JULIET: Cytokine Release Syndrome Tocilizumab administered according to a protocol-specific treatment algorithm (CRS graded per the Penn scale 1 ) 3% of patients with grade 2 CRS 50% with grade 3 CRS 100% with grade 4 CRS Patients [N = 111] Time to onset, median (range), days a 3 (1-9) Duration, median (range), days a 7 (2-30) Hypotension that required intervention, % 26 High-dose vasopressors, % 6 Intubated, % 7 Anticytokine therapy, % 16 Tocilizumab, % 15 Corticosteroids, % 11 a Calculated based only on patients who had cytokine release syndrome (n = 64), excluding 1 patient who had onset on day 51. 1. Porter DL, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(303):303ra139.

JULIET: Predictors of Safety Effect of Pre-infusion Values Tumor volume ( vs < 100 ml) Ferritin ( vs < 1000 µg/l) CRP ( vs < 50 mg/l) LDH ( vs < 500 U/L) CAR-positive viable T-cell dose No significant relationship between dose and CRS when accounting for baseline tumor burden No relationship observed between dose and neurologic events No relationship between dose and efficacy Grade 1-4 CRS 2 4 6 8 10 12 Odds Ratio Grade 1-4 neurologic events CRP, C-reactive protein; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase

JULIET: ORR Consistent Across Subgroups Null hypothesis of ORR 20% ORR n/n (%) [95% CI] All patients 48/93 (52) [41-62] Age <65 years 35/71 (49) [37-61] 65 years 13/22 (59) [36-79] Sex Female 19/33 (58) [39-74.5] Male 29/60 (48) [35-62] Prior response status Refractory to last line 19/48 (40) [26-55] Relapsed to last line 29/45 (64) [49-78] IPI at enrollment <2 risk factors 14/25 (56) [35-76] 2 risk factors 34/68 (50) [38-62] Prior antineoplastic therapy 2 lines 26/49 (53) [38-67.5] >2 lines 22/44 (50) [35-65] Molecular subtype Activated B-cell 21/40 (52) [36-69] Germinal cell 24/50 (48) [34-63] Prior HSCT therapy No 26/52 (50) [36-64] Yes 22/41 (54) [37-69] Rearranged MYC/BCL2/BCL6 Double/Triple hits 8/16 (50) [25-75] Other 40/77 (52) [40-63.5] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

JULIET: At 14 Months Median Follow-Up, Median DOR Not Reached ORR, 52% (95% CI, 41%-62%); 40% CR, 12% PR a Probability of Maintaining Response, % 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 No. at risk CR patients All patients Median (95% CI) All patients, NR (10.0-NE) a Best ORR within 3 months of infusion CR patients All patients 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Time Since First Response, Months 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 37 36 35 32 31 30 26 26 26 23 21 15 9 8 8 8 7 4 48 37 32 27 27 22 10 9 8 Median DOR has not been reached 12-mo relapse-free survival rate 78.5% (95% CI, 60%-89%) among CR patients 65% (95% CI, 49%-78%) among all responders 54% (13/24) of patients converted from PR to CR, including 2 patients 9-12 mo after initial response Tisagenlecleucel transgene was detected in peripheral blood for up to 2 years in responding patients No patients proceeded to transplant while in response NE, not evaluable; NR, not reached

JULIET: Median Overall Survival Was Not Reached for CR Patients 1.0 Probability of Survival, % 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 CR patients All patients Median, mo (95% CI) CR patients, NE (17.9-NE) All patients, 11.7 (6.6-NE) 0.0 No. at risk CR patients All patients 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Time Since Infusion, Months 40 40 40 40 39 39 38 38 37 36 30 29 23 16 16 12 9 9 7 3 2 1 1 111 94 71 60 50 40 28 19 11 8 2 1 Overall survival at 12 mo 49% among all infused patients 95% among CR patients

JULIET: Summary of Tisagenlecleucel in R/R Aggressive DLBCL In this update of the JULIET study, with a median follow-up of 14 months: AEs were effectively managed by appropriately trained study-site personnel No deaths were attributed to tisagenlecleucel, CRS, or cerebral edema Baseline tumor volume, LDH, ferritin, and CRP are associated with higher risk of any-grade CRS and neurotoxicity Tisagenlecleucel produced a high percentage of durable responses in patients with R/R DLBCL (ORR 52%; CR 40%) 49% overall survival rate at 12 mo (95% among CR patients) Median DOR was not reached 54% of patients with an initial PR converted to CR (up to 12 mo) 83% of patients in CR/PR at 3 mo remained progression free at 12 mo