The effect of resection of the primary tumour for stage IV colorectal cancer on patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Similar documents
Role of Primary Resection for Patients with Oligometastatic Disease

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Title: What is the role of pre-operative PET/PET-CT in the management of patients with

Surveillance report Published: 17 March 2016 nice.org.uk

Connecting towards impact. Prospective Dutch CRC cohort

When is local surgery indicated in metastatic breast cancer?

Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival, measured as the time in weeks from randomization to date of death due to any cause.

Trends and Comparative Effectiveness in Treatment of Stage IV Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Michiel H.F. Poorthuis*, Robin W.M. Vernooij*, R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar and Theo M. de Reijke

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Imatinib (Glivec) for adjuvant therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. August 2008

SUMMARY OF THE SIRFLOX RESULTS

Laparoscopic vs Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery: Making it better!

Colorectal stenting. Alessandro Repici, MD Digestive Endoscopy Unit IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas Milano, Italy

CON: Removal of the Breast Primary in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of post-imatinib therapy in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour

5-ASA for the treatment of Crohn s disease DR. STEPHEN HANAUER FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, CHICAGO, IL, USA

2. The effectiveness of combined androgen blockade versus monotherapy.

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

Critical Appraisal of a Meta-Analysis: Rosiglitazone and CV Death. Debra Moy Faculty of Pharmacy University of Toronto

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE): Checklist.

Original Article Lack of association between bcl-2 expression and prognosis of osteosarcoma: a meta-analysis

Long term survival study of de-novo metastatic breast cancers with or without primary tumor resection

Distraction techniques

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: August 30, 2018 Report Length: 11 Pages

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy following resection of early stage thymoma

Planned relaparotomy following curative resection of a locally advanced gastrointestinal cancer

Examination of the impact of shifting practice from plain film mammography to digital mammography

Heart failure. Complex clinical syndrome. Estimated prevalence of ~2.4% (NHANES)

U T C H. No disclosure

Strategies to increase the uptake of the influenza vaccine by healthcare workers: A summary of the evidence

University of Groningen. Colorectal Anastomoses Bakker, Ilsalien

How to improve the reliability of Single Arm Trials

Evaluation of SIRFLOX Study Results. Prof. V. Heinemann CCC LMU, Klinikum Grosshadern Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Germany

Review. A. Di Leo 1 *, M. Buyse 2 & H. Bleiberg 1. Introduction. Design and main results of the trials

Prognostic significance of K-Ras mutation rate in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Bruno Vincenzi Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2010: Highlights from a Surgical Perspective. Disclosures

Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer(review)

Surgical Management of Metastatic Colon Cancer: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database

OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

Metastasectomy for Melanoma What s the Evidence and When Do We Stop?

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Inequity in access to guideline-recommended colorectal cancer treatment in Nova Scotia, Canada

TAP blocks vs wound infiltration in laparoscopic colectomies Results of a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

Colon Cancer Liver Metastases: Liver-Directed Therapy

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

Surgery versus non-surgical treatment for bronchiectasis (Review)

Problem solving therapy

Can erythropoietin treatment during antiviral drug treatment for hepatitis C be cost effective?

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis: Changing Treatment Paradigms. Overall Clinical Significance 8/3/13

Ependymoma Programme Synopsis

Significance of Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Standard-Risk Renal Transplant in Tacrolimus Era: A Meta-Analysis

PRECEPTORSHIP PROGRAMME

Primary tumor resection in colorectal cancer with unresectable synchronous metastases: A review

FEEDBACK 2014 Annex 2: Survival Outcomes

Presentation Number: LBA18_PR. Lecture Time: 09:15-09:27. Speakers: Heinz-Josef J. Lenz (Los Angeles, US) Background

Long Term Results in GIST Treatment

Predictors of Palliative Therapy Receipt in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

4.3 Input parameters Patient

Surgical Management of Advanced Stage Colon Cancer. Nathan Huber, MD 6/11/14

Factors associated with delayed time to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage iii colon cancer

Canadian Cochrane Network & Centre. Copyright 05/12/2009 by Phil Hahn

Update on management of metastatic brain disease. Peter Hoskin Mount Vernon Cancer Centre Northwood UK

Annals of Medicine and Surgery

Colorectal Cancer Multidisciplinary management, standards of care and future perspectives

Effective Health Care Program

Models of preventive care in clinical practice to achieve 25 by 25

Results. NeuRA Treatments for internalised stigma December 2017

Surgical Management of Pulmonary Metastases. Dr AG Jacobs Principal Specialist Dept Cardiothoracic Surgery Steve Biko Academic Hospital

Carotid Artery Stenosis

Opinion 17 October 2012

Use of Joinpoint Regression to Define Phases of Care From Diagnosis of Metastases Until Death in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

Is There a New Standard of Care for Adjuvant Therapy in Colon Cancer? When is 3 Months Enough?

Tristate Lung Meeting 2014 Pro-Con Debate: Surgery has no role in the management of certain subsets of N2 disease

removal of adenomatous polyps detects important effectively as follow-up colonoscopy after both constitute a low-risk Patients with 1 or 2

Combined FOXFIRE Study Data Presented at ASCO Annual Meeting

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY...

Carcinoma del colon-retto: La Chirurgia Robotica nella Malattia Avanzata

Cigdem Benlice, Ipek Sapci, T. Bora Cengiz, Luca Stocchi, Michael Valente, Tracy Hull, Scott R. Steele, Emre Gorgun 07/23/2018

Cetuximab plus 5-FU/FA/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a large-scale Phase II study (OPUS)

Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests

Jose Ramos. Role of Surgery in isolated hepatic metastasis from breast carcinoma, melanoma or sarcoma

Selective reporting, quality of reporting and statistical significance chasing in prognostic marker studies

Outcomes of Patients with Preoperative Weight Loss following Colorectal Surgery

The New CP 3 R Application And Revisions To Standard 4.6 Integration Of The NCDB With The Accreditation Process

Mauricio Camus Appuhn Associate Professor Chief, Department of Surgical Oncology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 3

Prostate Cancer Screening: Risks and Benefits across the Ages

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Braine-l Alleud, Belgium; 12 MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

Saudi Arabia February Pr Michel KOMAJDA. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Hospital Pitié Salpétrière

Asymptomatic primary tumour in incurable metastatic colorectal cancer: is there a role for surgical resection prior to systematic therapy or not?

FIRST RENAL REPLACEMENT

Supplementary Online Content

MEETING SUMMARY ESMO 2018, Munich, Germany. Dr. Jenny Seligmann University of Leeds, UK HIGHLIGHTS ON COLORECTAL CANCER

Neodjuvant chemotherapy

A Population-Based Study on the Uptake and Utilization of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for Brain Metastasis in Nova Scotia

Title: Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in Indian population: A systematic review

The influence of CONSORT on the quality of reports of RCTs: An updated review. Thanks to MRC (UK), and CIHR (Canada) for funding support

Cancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R) Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS)

Transcription:

The effect of resection of the primary tumour for stage IV colorectal cancer on patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis C.Clancy, J.P. Burke, M. Barry, M.F Kalady, J.C. Coffey Dept. of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital, Limerick, Ireland Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Stage IV Disease ~ 25% of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients Emergency presentation Resection

Asymptomatic Stage IV Disease Management of asymptomatic patients Primary tumour Chemotherapy only Resection + chemotherapy

Resection Vs Chemotherapy Potential survival benefit associated with removal of primary tumour in other cancers Pro resection Circulating pro-tumorigenic mediators Against resection Induce tumour growth

Current Evidence No randomised controlled trials evidence for survival benefit selection bias

Aim Conduct a meta-analysis to determine the effect of primary tumour resection + chemotherapy Vs. chemotherapy only for stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases on patient survival Primary endpoints: Survival benefit Secondary endpoints: Patient characteristics Tumour location Metastatic burden

Search of Methods - Pubmed / Embase / Cochrane database for published studies which included data on resection vs chemotherapy alone in stage IV colorectal cancer 2 authors independantly examined the full texts of eligible studies Reference lists of included studies were screened for additional eligible studies

Eligibility criteria Included Studies with comparative data on resection + chemotherapy Vs chemotherapy alone in stage IV disease Excluded Non stage IV, no comparative data, non resection surgery and resection of metastases 8

Results

PRISMA diagram

Included Trial Characteristics First author Year Country Study Type Enrolment interval N resection N no resection Median survival Resection Median survival no resection Scoggins CR 1999 USA Retro 1985-1997 66 23 14.5 months 16.6 months Tebbutt NC 2003 UK Retro 1990-2000 280 82 14 months 8.2 months Ruo L 2003 USA Retro 1996-1999 127 103 16 months 9 months Michel P 2004 France Retro 1996-1999 31 23 21 months 14 months Cummins ER 2004 USA Retro 1989-2003 36 25 11.5 months 4.8 months Cook AD 2005 USA Retro 1988-2000 17657 9097 11 months 2 months Benoist S 2005 France Retro 1997-2002 32 27 22 months 23 months Galizia G 2008 Italy Retro 1995-2005 42 23 36 months 17 months Kaufman MS 2008 USA Retro 1998-2003 115 70 30 months 15 months Chan TW 2010 Canada Retro 2000-2002 286 125 14 months 6 months Aslam MI 2010 UK Retro 1998-2007 366 281 14.5 months 5.8 months Cellini C 2010 USA Retro 2002-2008 22 9 32 months 37 months Seo GJ 2010 Korea Retro 2001-2008 144 83 22 months 14 months Karoui M 2011 France Retro 1998-2007 85 123 30.7 months 21.9 months Venderbosch S 2011 Netherlands Cohort 2003-2004 258 141 16.7 months 11.4 months Venderbosch S 2011 Netherlands Cohort 2005-2006 289 159 20.7 months 13.4 months Kim SK 2012 Korea Retro 2000-2009 105 96 14 months 8 months Verberne CJ 2012 Netherlands Retro 2002-2006 26 21 26 months 17 months Ferrand F 2013 France Cohort 1997-2001 156 60 16.3 months 19.5 months Boselli C 2013 Italy Retro 2010-2011 17 31 4 months 5 months Tsang WY 2013 USA Retro 1996-2007 8,599 3,117 21 months 10 months Ahmed S 2013 Canada Retro 1992-2005 761 419 15.2 months 8.3 months

Patient Characteristics

Treatment type and age > 65 N 27,915 Odds Ratio 0.846 95% CI 0.529 1.353 P value 0.48

Treatment type and ASA grade 3 N 896 Odds Ratio 0.868 95% CI 0.223 3.384 P value 0.84

Tumour Location

Treatment type and colon tumours N 41,185 Odds Ratio 1.728 95% CI 1.231 2.434 P value 0.002

Treatment type and rectal tumours N 42,079 Odds Ratio 0.495 95% CI 0.390 0.629 P value <0.001

Mortality Risk and Survival Benefit

Mortality Risk N 16, 295 Odds Ratio 0.28 95% CI 0.165 0.474 P value <0.001 Mean follow up 33 +/- 15 months

Survival Benefit N 43,720 SMD 6.4 months 95% CI 5.025 7.858 P value <0.001

Metastatic Burden

Treatment type and metastases confined to the liver N 1,749 OR 1.551 95% CI 1.247 1.929 P value <0.001

Treatment type and 2 metastases N 2,132 OR 0.653 95% CI 0.508 0.839 P value = 0.001

Summary There is a reduced mortality risk associated with resection of the primary tumour over a follow up over 33 months There is a standard mean difference in survival of 6.4 months in favour of resection Resection of the primary tumour in stage IV colorectal cancer is performed more commonly in - colon cancer compared to rectal cancer - patients with single metastases and liver only metastases

Conclusions Current literature suggests resection of the primary tumour in stage IV colorectal cancer confers a survival advantage There is significant selection bias present in all available data however, as all studies are retrospective and those undergoing resection have a lower metastatic burden Randomised controlled trials to determine the optimal treatment for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer are urgently required