Plasmid-Driven Formation of Influenza Virus-Like Particles

Similar documents
Reverse Genetics of RNA Viruses

Unidirectional RNA polymerase I polymerase II transcription system for the generation of influenza A virus from eight plasmids

Hierarchy among Viral RNA (vrna) Segments in Their Role in vrna Incorporation into Influenza A Virions

Viral Vectors In The Research Laboratory: Just How Safe Are They? Dawn P. Wooley, Ph.D., SM(NRM), RBP, CBSP

Lecture 2: Virology. I. Background

Viral reproductive cycle

The accumulation of influenza A virus segment 7 spliced mrnas is regulated by the NS1 protein

number Done by Corrected by Doctor Ashraf

MINIREVIEW. Reverse Genetics of Influenza Virus

Size nm m m

VIRUSES. 1. Describe the structure of a virus by completing the following chart.

Influenza viruses. Virion. Genome. Genes and proteins. Viruses and hosts. Diseases. Distinctive characteristics

Chapter 13B: Animal Viruses

numbe r Done by Corrected by Doctor

Chapter 19: Viruses. 1. Viral Structure & Reproduction. 2. Bacteriophages. 3. Animal Viruses. 4. Viroids & Prions

Supplementary Figure 1. SC35M polymerase activity in the presence of Bat or SC35M NP encoded from the phw2000 rescue plasmid.

Chapter 19: Viruses. 1. Viral Structure & Reproduction. What exactly is a Virus? 11/7/ Viral Structure & Reproduction. 2.

LESSON 4.4 WORKBOOK. How viruses make us sick: Viral Replication

Ralf Wagner Paul-Ehrlich-Institut

19 Viruses BIOLOGY. Outline. Structural Features and Characteristics. The Good the Bad and the Ugly. Structural Features and Characteristics

Shin-Hee Kim, Yongqi Yan, and Siba K. Samal*

Dr. Ahmed K. Ali Attachment and entry of viruses into cells

MINIREVIEW. Recovery of Negative-Strand RNA Viruses from Plasmid DNAs: A Positive Approach Revitalizes a Negative Field

Unexpected complexity in the interference activity of a cloned influenza defective interfering RNA


The M2 Ectodomain Is Important for Its Incorporation into Influenza A Virions

Impact of Amino Acid Mutations in PB2, PB1-F2, and NS1 on the Replication and Pathogenicity of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza Viruses

Virus and Prokaryotic Gene Regulation - 1

7.012 Problem Set 6 Solutions

Viral structure م.م رنا مشعل

Efficient formation of influenza virus-like particles: dependence on the expression levels of viral proteins

October 26, Lecture Readings. Vesicular Trafficking, Secretory Pathway, HIV Assembly and Exit from Cell

LESSON 4.6 WORKBOOK. Designing an antiviral drug The challenge of HIV

hemagglutinin and the neuraminidase genes (RNA/recombinant viruses/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/genetics)

Gag. Gag-Gag. TSG101 Nedd4. Two-Hybrid HIV Gag. Two-Hybrid. Two-Hybrid

LESSON 1.4 WORKBOOK. Viral structures. Just how small are viruses? Workbook Lesson 1.4 1

Influenza A virus hemagglutinin and neuraminidase act as novel motile machinery. Tatsuya Sakai, Shin I. Nishimura, Tadasuke Naito, and Mineki Saito

Coronaviruses. Virion. Genome. Genes and proteins. Viruses and hosts. Diseases. Distinctive characteristics

Cristina Cassetti, Ph.D.

Influenza viruses are classified as members of the family

Overview of virus life cycle

11/15/2011. Outline. Structural Features and Characteristics. The Good the Bad and the Ugly. Viral Genomes. Structural Features and Characteristics

Virus Entry/Uncoating

Patricia Fitzgerald-Bocarsly

~Lentivirus production~

Recombinant Protein Expression Retroviral system

Fayth K. Yoshimura, Ph.D. September 7, of 7 HIV - BASIC PROPERTIES

Relative activity (%) SC35M

HS-LS4-4 Construct an explanation based on evidence for how natural selection leads to adaptation of populations.

Overview: Chapter 19 Viruses: A Borrowed Life

Chapter 18. Viral Genetics. AP Biology

Multiplication. Bernard Roizman. General Concepts

19/06/2013. Viruses are not organisms (do not belong to any kingdom). Viruses are not made of cells, have no cytoplasm, and no membranes.

The humoral immune responses to IBV proteins.

VIROLOGY. Engineering Viral Genomes: Retrovirus Vectors

Virology Introduction. Definitions. Introduction. Structure of virus. Virus transmission. Classification of virus. DNA Virus. RNA Virus. Treatment.

The Zombies of the Scientific Community Viruses and Other Acellular Infectious Agents. Acellular Agents

Reverse genetic platform for inactivated and live-attenuated influenza vaccine

Revisiting the Definition of Living Thing

Negative-strand RNA viruses: Genetic engineering and applications

AP Biology. Viral diseases Polio. Chapter 18. Smallpox. Influenza: 1918 epidemic. Emerging viruses. A sense of size

LESSON 1.4 WORKBOOK. Viral sizes and structures. Workbook Lesson 1.4

Pandemic Influenza influenza epidemic: realization of a worst-case scenario

Rescue of Recombinant Thogoto Virus from Cloned cdna

Live Bivalent Vaccine for Parainfluenza and Influenza Virus Infections

Influenza Virus Matrix Protein Is the Major Driving Force in Virus Budding

Unit 2: Lesson 2 Case Studies: Influenza and HIV LESSON QUESTIONS

Last time we talked about the few steps in viral replication cycle and the un-coating stage:

Chapter13 Characterizing and Classifying Viruses, Viroids, and Prions

AP Biology Reading Guide. Concept 19.1 A virus consists of a nucleic acid surrounded by a protein coat

Medical Virology. Herpesviruses, Orthomyxoviruses, and Retro virus. - Herpesviruses Structure & Composition: Herpesviruses

5/6/17. Diseases. Disease. Pathogens. Domain Bacteria Characteristics. Bacteria Viruses (including HIV) Pathogens are disease-causing organisms

Section 6. Junaid Malek, M.D.

Human Genome Complexity, Viruses & Genetic Variability

Reoviruses. Virion. Genome. Genes and proteins. Viruses and hosts. Diseases. Distinctive characteristics

Hepatitis B Antiviral Drug Development Multi-Marker Screening Assay

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Chapter 19: The Genetics of Viruses and Bacteria

Virus Research 143 (2009) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Virus Research. journal homepage:

2.1 VIRUSES. 2.1 Learning Goals

Negative Strand RNA Virus Downloaded from by on 05/03/18. For personal use only. Negative Strand.

University of Groningen. Computational studies of influenza hemagglutinin Boonstra, Sander

Viruses. Picture from:

B19, see Parvovirus B19 Bone marrow, gene transfer with parvovirus. Erythrovirus, see Parvovirus B19, Simian parvovirus

Name Section Problem Set 6

علم األحياء الدقيقة Microbiology Introduction to Virology & Immunology

Coronaviruses cause acute, mild upper respiratory infection (common cold).

Chapter 6- An Introduction to Viruses*

Reassortment of influenza A virus genes linked to PB1 polymerase gene

Mutations at Alternative 5 Splice Sites of M1 mrna Negatively Affect Influenza A Virus Viability and Growth Rate

Chapter 08 Lecture Outline

the world and viruses

Supplementary Fig. S1. Schematic diagram of minigenome segments.

Unité de Génétique Moléculaire des Virus Respiratoires, URA 1966 CNRS, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, PARIS Cedex 15, France

Polyomaviridae. Spring

Received 31 October 2009/Accepted 11 February 2010

Julianne Edwards. Retroviruses. Spring 2010

Interaction of influenza virus polymerase with viral RNA in the corkscrew conformation

Recombinant influenza viruses as delivery vectors for hepatis B virus epitopes

2) What is the difference between a non-enveloped virion and an enveloped virion? (4 pts)

Transcription:

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Jan. 2000, p. 547 551 Vol. 74, No. 1 0022-538X/00/$04.00 0 Copyright 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Plasmid-Driven Formation of Influenza Virus-Like Particles GABRIELE NEUMANN, 1 TOKIKO WATANABE, 1,2 AND YOSHIHIRO KAWAOKA 1 * Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, 1 and Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Disease Control, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan 2 Received 24 June 1999/Accepted 16 September 1999 We established a plasmid-based system for generating infectious influenza virus-like particles entirely from cloned cdnas. Human embryonic kidney cells (293T) were transfected with plasmids encoding the influenza A virus structural proteins and with a plasmid encoding an influenza virus-like viral RNA (vrna) which contained an antisense copy of the cdna for green fluorescence protein (GFP) flanked by an RNA polymerase I promoter and terminator. Intracellular transcription of the latter construct by RNA polymerase I generated GFP vrna that was packaged into influenza virus-like particles. This system, which produced more than 10 4 infectious particles per ml of supernatant, would be useful in studies of influenza virus replication and particle formation. It might also benefit efforts in vaccine production and in the development of improved gene therapy vectors. Influenza A viruses possess a genome of eight singlestranded negative-sense viral RNAs (vrnas) that encode a total of 10 proteins. The influenza virus life cycle begins with binding of the hemagglutinin (HA) to sialic acid-containing receptors on the surface of the host cell (reviewed in reference 6), followed by receptor-mediated endocytosis. The low ph in late endosomes triggers a conformational shift in the HA, resulting in fusion of the viral and endosomal membranes and the consequent release of the matrix protein (M1) and ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) into the cytosol of infected cells. RNPs consist of the nucleoprotein (NP), which encapsidates vrna, and the viral polymerase complex, which is formed by the PA, PB1, and PB2 proteins. RNPs are transported into the nucleus, where transcription and replication take place. Newly synthesized RNPs are then exported from the nucleus and transported to the cellular membrane, where progeny virus particles are assembled. The neuraminidase (NA) protein plays a crucial role late in infection by removing sialic acid from sialyloligosaccharides, thus releasing newly assembled virions from the cell surface and preventing the selfaggregation of virus particles. Although virus assembly involves protein-protein and protein-vrna interactions, the nature of these interactions is largely unknown. A vaccinia virus-based system for the generation of influenza virus-like particles (VLPs) has been established (2, 7). In this system, an influenza virus-like vrna carrying a reporter gene is transcribed in vitro and transfected into eukaryotic cells. All 10 influenza virus proteins are expressed from plasmids under the control of a T7 RNA polymerase promoter. When the transfected cells are infected with a recombinant vaccinia virus that expresses T7 RNA polymerase, they produce influenza VLPs containing the vrna of an artificial reporter gene (7). However, vaccinia virus expresses more than 80 proteins, any of which could affect the influenza virus life cycle. We therefore sought to establish an efficient plasmid-driven system for * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, 2015 Linden Dr. West, Madison, WI 53706. Phone: (608) 265-4925. Fax: (608) 265-5622. E-mail: kawaokay@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu. the generation of infectious influenza VLPs containing a viruslike RNA segment. Expression of the influenza virus proteins PB2, PB1, PA, and NP leads to replication and transcription of an artificial vrna. To generate influenza VLPs, we used the RNA polymerase I system for the intracellular synthesis of influenza virus RNAs (Fig. 1) (12). In this system, a cdna carrying a reporter gene in antisense orientation is flanked by the 5 and 3 noncoding regions of an influenza virus RNA (Fig. 2). This cassette is inserted between an RNA polymerase I promoter and terminator. Transfection of such constructs into eukaryotic cells leads to transcription of the reporter gene by cellular RNA polymerase I, thereby generating influenza virus-like RNAs (12). Upon influenza virus infection, the artificial vr- NAs are replicated and transcribed by the viral polymerase complex, resulting in the expression of the reporter gene (12). We first tested whether expression of the PB2, PB1, PA, and NP proteins leads to expression of the reporter gene carried by the RNA polymerase I-derived transcript. Plasmids (1 g each) expressing the NP protein of A/WSN/33 (H1N1) virus under the control of the chicken -actin promoter (pcaggs- WSN-NP0/14) (10), the polymerase proteins of A/PR/8/34 virus under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter [pcdna762(pb2), pcdna774(pb1), and pcdna787(pa)] (14), and an RNA polymerase I reporter gene construct (ppoli-gfp) (Fig. 2) were transfected into human embryonic kidney (293T) cells as described previously (11). Forty-eight hours later, 30 to 40% of the cells were expressing green fluorescence protein (GFP) (Fig. 3). In contrast, GFP expression could not be detected in transfected cells lacking the polymerase or NP proteins. These results indicate that NP and the three influenza virus polymerase proteins had formed a functional complex that replicated and transcribed the RNA polymerase I-derived GFP vrna. Optimal vrna transcription and replication. To determine the amounts of plasmid DNA required for optimal reporter GFP expression, we modulated the expression of the polymerase proteins and NP. Previous studies had indicated that large amounts of PA reduce the extent of reporter gene expression in transcription-replication systems (7). We therefore reduced in a stepwise manner the expression of PA from the plasmid, identifying 0.1 g of pcdna787(pa) as the template amount 547

548 NOTES J. VIROL. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of VLP generation strategy. Individual protein expression plasmids and a plasmid containing the RNA polymerase I promoter, a cdna encoding the GFP reporter gene, and the RNA polymerase I terminator are transfected into 293T cells. Intracellular transcription by RNA polymerase I yields GFP vrna of negative polarity, as indicated by inverted letters. Supernatants containing VLPs are harvested, mixed with influenza helper virus, and inoculated into MDCK cells. yielding the strongest expression of GFP (data not shown). With NP, the major structural component of RNP complexes, large amounts of protein expression plasmid may be required. However, larger amounts of the plasmid did not appreciably affect the number of GFP-positive 293T cells (data not shown). In addition, various amounts of the PB2 and PB1 protein expression plasmids (ranging from 1.0 to 0.03 g) did not affect GFP expression in 293T cells (data not shown). Hence, in all subsequent experiments, we used 0.1 g of pcdna787(pa) and 1.0 g of pcdna774(pb1), pcdna762(pb2), and pcaggs-wsn-np0/14. Formation of influenza VLPs from cloned cdnas. Previous studies with the vaccinia virus T7 RNA polymerase system showed that the formation of influenza VLPs requires nine influenza virus proteins: PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NA, NP, M1, M2, and NS2 (7). The NS1 protein, in contrast, is dispensable for particle formation (7). To establish an efficient plasmid-driven system for VLP generation, we generated cdnas encoding the HA, NA, M1, M2, and NS2 genes and cloned them into the eukaryotic expression vector pcaggs/mcs (controlled by the chicken -actin promoter) (13), resulting in pewsn-ha, pcaggs-wna15, pcaggs-wsn-m1-2/1, pep24c, and pca-ns2, respectively. Expression of each protein was confirmed by Western blot analysis (data not shown). To generate VLPs, we first transfected 10 6 293T cells with 1.0 g of each protein expression plasmid [with the exception of pcdna787(pa), for which we used 0.1 g] and with 1 g of the reporter gene construct ppoli-gfp. Culture supernatants were harvested 48 h after transfection and mixed with A/WSN/33 virus to provide the influenza virus proteins required for replication and transcription of GFP vrna. The mixture was then inoculated into MDCK cells (Fig. 1). Ten hours after incubation, we detected GFP-positive MDCK cells, corresponding to 450 particles/ml of supernatant (Table 1). Thus, plasmid-driven expression of all influenza virus structural proteins resulted in the formation of infectious influenza VLPs containing GFP vrna that could be delivered into subsequent cells. Optimal assembly of influenza virus. VLP formation was also studied in cells expressing different amounts of the RNA polymerase I reporter gene construct, as well as HA, NA, M1, M2, and NS2 plasmid DNAs. In experiments with ppoli-gfp, 1.0 g of the plasmid DNA was highly efficient in generating VLPs, whereas the efficiency was significantly reduced for 2.0 or 3.0 g (data not shown). Because the NS2 and M2 proteins are expressed in small amounts late in infection, we reasoned that relatively small amounts of the expression plasmids would be needed for optimal VLP formation. Reduction of the M2 expression construct from 1.0 to 0.1 g resulted in more than a 10-fold increase in the number of GFP-positive MDCK cells (Table 1); further reduction to 0.03 g did not increase the number of VLPs. For NS2, smaller amounts of plasmid (0.1 g) were associated with less efficient formation of VLPs (Table 1). The M1 protein is the major structural component of the FIG. 2. The ppoli-gfp plasmid for generating influenza virus-like RNA encoding the GFP protein. The GFP gene (derived from pegfp-n1 [Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.]) was inserted in the antisense orientation into phl1844 (E. Hoffmann, Ph.D. thesis, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany), which contains the 5 and 3 noncoding regions of influenza A virus segment 5 (NP-NTRs). The gene was flanked by multiple cloning sites (MCS1 and MCS2) and by the human RNA polymerase I promoter and the mouse RNA polymerase I terminator. Asterisks indicate mutations introduced to upregulate promoter activity (10a).

VOL. 74, 2000 NOTES 549 FIG. 3. The PA, PB1, PB2, and NP proteins of influenza A virus encapsidate GFP vrna produced by RNA polymerase I, leading to GFP expression. 293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing the PB2, PB1, PA, and NP proteins (A) or with all plasmids except the one expressing the NP protein (B), together with the RNA polymerase I-GFP gene plasmid for intracellular synthesis of reporter gene vrna. Cells were fixed 48 h after transfection, and GFP expression was determined with a fluorescence microscope. Magnification, 100. virion. Thus, high levels of M1 expression are likely required for efficient formation of VLPs. This prediction was tested in experiments comparing VLP formation in cells transfected with 1.0 or 2.0 g of M1 plasmid DNA. As shown in Table 1, larger amounts of plasmid resulted in more than a 10-fold increase in the number of GFP-positive MDCK cells. Comparison of two different amounts (1 and 2 g) of plasmids expressing the HA and NA proteins did not reveal any appreciable differences in VLP formation (data not shown), leading to selection of 1 g of each plasmid (pewsn-ha and pcaggs- WNA15) for use in subsequent experiments. Overall, these studies resulted in a 100-fold increase in the efficiency of VLP formation, ultimately leading to the production of more than 10 4 infectious influenza virus particles per ml of supernatant (Fig. 4). Authenticity of VLPs produced entirely from plasmids. To verify that VLPs initiate infection in the same manner as authentic influenza viruses, we attempted to neutralize the VLPs with antibody to the A/WSN/33 HA. VLP-containing supernatants derived from plasmid-transfected 293T cells were incubated with a pool of anti-a/wsn/33 HA monoclonal antibodies or with a monoclonal antibody to the G protein of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (negative control) for 1 h at room temperature. A/PR/8/34 helper virus, which is not neutralized by the pool of anti-a/wsn/33 HA monoclonal antibodies, was added to the mixture and inoculated into MDCK cells. Only the A/WSN/33 HA-specific monoclonal antibody neutralized the VLPs (data not shown), indicating that the HA mediates the attachment and entry of VLPs into cells. Next, we identified the minimal set of proteins required for the formation of VLPs. Others have established that the three influenza virus polymerases and the NP are essential for the replication and transcription of vrna (3). Therefore, we included each of these four proteins in our assay but consecutively omitted HA, NA, M1, M2, or NS2. Exclusion of either of the plasmids mentioned above did not affect the replicationtranscription of GFP vrna in transfected 293T cells (data not shown). Supernatants derived from transfected 293T cells that lacked the HA, NA, M1, or NS2 protein did not promote GFP expression in infected MDCK cells, indicating the absence of infectious VLPs. Infectious VLPs were detected with the omission of M2 but the number was low ( 500-fold reduction compared to the full set of structural proteins). Thus, all influenza virus structural proteins are required for the efficient formation of infectious VLPs, in accord with data from studies of the vaccinia virus-based system (7). TABLE 1. Optimal amounts of plasmid DNA for the formation of infectious VLPs a Amt ( g) of plasmid DNA expressing: PB2 PB1 PA HA NP NA M1 M2 NS2 GFP vrna Relative efficiency of VLP formation b 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 1.0 1.0 17 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.3 1.0 24 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 11 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 220 a 293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids for all nine influenza virus structural proteins and with the RNA polymerase I-GFP gene plasmid. Forty-eight hours after transfection, VLP-containing supernatants were collected, mixed with A/WSN/33 helper virus, and inoculated into MDCK cells. The cells were fixed 10 h after infection, and GFP expression was determined with a fluorescence microscope. Only the amounts of the M1, M2, and NS2 plasmids were varied (bold type) to determine their optimal amounts for GFP expression in MDCK cells. Experiments were performed three times, and representative data are shown. b Determined by counting the number of GFP-positive cells in five microscopic fields. The sample containing 1 g of each plasmid (which yielded 450 infectious VLPs/ml of supernatant) was chosen as the reference (value of 1).

550 NOTES J. VIROL. FIG. 4. Generation of infectious influenza VLPs. 293T cells were transfected with nine plasmids, each expressing a different viral structural protein (A), or with eight plasmids omitting the construct for NP (B), together with the RNA polymerase I-GFP gene plasmid. Forty-eight hours after transfection, supernatants were collected, mixed with A/WSN/33 helper virus, and inoculated into MDCK cells. Cells were fixed at 10 h after infection, and GFP expression in VLP-infected MDCK cells was determined with a fluorescence microscope. Magnification, 100. VSV glycoprotein can replace the HA and NA proteins in the production of VLPs. To test the utility of our plasmid-based system for virus assembly studies, we replaced the influenza virus HA and NA proteins with the VSV-G protein, which functions in receptor binding and fusion. When 293T cells were transfected with ppoli-gfp, with optimal amounts of the PB2, PB1, PA, NP, M1, M2, and NS2 expression constructs, and with 1 g of the VSV-G construct (pcaggs-vsv-g), substitution of the VSV-G protein for influenza virus glycoproteins did not adversely affect VLP formation (data not shown). In fact, we reproducibly found slightly higher numbers ( 1.2- fold) of GFP-positive cells when VSV-G, rather than the HA and NA, served as the viral glycoprotein. Thus, the VSV-G protein can be efficiently incorporated into virions and can function as well as the HA and NA in virus release and entry. An efficient system for generating infectious influenza virus particles would be an asset in research with this virus and potentially in the production of vaccines and vectors for gene therapy. Moreover, this VLP system leads to the generation of influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cdna (11). The VLP production strategy described here is highly efficient, both in the initial transfection of cells and in the yield of VLPs ( 10 4 infectious particles/ml of supernatant). Moreover, it is driven entirely by plasmids expressing influenza virus proteins (i.e., in the absence of any other viral proteins), which greatly simplifies the interpretation of results. Another major advantage is the capability of studying the effects of lethal mutations in virion formation, the packaging of RNP complexes, the budding of virus replication, and the binding and fusion processes. In addition, we expect that our system would operate equally well with other viruses, e.g., paramyxoviruses and rhabdoviruses. We demonstrated that the influenza virus HA and NA proteins can be functionally replaced by the VSV-G protein. Influenza viruses failed to incorporate VSV-G protein when provided by recombinant simian virus 40 (9). However, assays had not been available to replace the influenza virus glycoproteins by foreign glycoproteins. Therefore, the question of whether interactions of HA and/or NA with other viral proteins are essential for virus formation remained open. Although a novel virus has been generated upon expression of VSV-G protein as well as a Semliki Forest virus replicon in the same cell, the infectious titer of this new virus is at least 10 5 -fold lower than that of normal VSV (15). Thus, the Semliki Forest virus replicon is not efficiently incorporated by VSV-G. By contrast, the infectious titers of VLPs with VSV-G, instead of HA and NA, were even higher than those of authentic influenza VLPs. Therefore, our finding suggests that neither HA nor NA is essential for the formation of VLPs. However, we cannot rule out a role for these glycoproteins in interactions with other viral proteins, which would affect the structure of virions and the efficiency of virion formation, as suggested by the elongated shapes of viruses expressing tailless HAs, NAs, or both (1, 4, 5, 8). We emphasize the potential value of our plasmid-based system for therapeutic gene delivery. One can now generate VLPs that contain a vrna encoding the proteins required for transcription and replication (i.e., the NP and the polymerases), as well as a vrna encoding the protein of interest. These particles are infectious and would deliver a designated gene into target cells, where it would replicate and be transcribed. Because these particles do not contain a full complement of viral genes, they cannot produce infectious progeny viruses. This feature, together with the lack of integration of the viral genome into host chromosomes, would ensure the biological safety of gene delivery in human and nonhuman subjects. Finally, the availability of 15 HA and 9 NA subtypes and their variants would allow one to administer VLPs repeatedly, thereby overcoming immunoresistance to vector-generated proteins, which is one of the major obstacles faced with repeated use of other viral vectors, such as adenoviruses. We suggest that the greatest benefit of our plasmid-driven system would be realized in situations requiring only short-term expression of foreign proteins, as in cancer treatment. REFERENCES 1. García-Sastre, A., and P. Palese. 1995. The cytoplasmic tail of the neuraminidase protein of influenza A virus does not play an important role in the packaging of this protein into viral envelopes. Virus Res. 37:37 47. 2. Gómez-Puertas, P., I. Mena, M. Castillo, A. Vivo, E. Perez-Pastrana, and A. Portela. 1999. Efficient formation of influenza virus-like particles: dependence on the expression levels of viral proteins. J. Gen. Virol. 80:1635 1645. 3. Honda, A., K. Uéda, K. Nagata, and A. Ishihama. 1988. RNA polymerase of influenza virus: role of NP in RNA chain elongation. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 104:1021 1026. 4. Jin, H., G. P. Leser, and R. A. Lamb. 1994. The influenza virus hemagglutinin

VOL. 74, 2000 NOTES 551 cytoplasmic tail is not essential for virus assembly or infectivity. EMBO J. 13:5504 5515. 5. Jin, H., G. P. Leser, J. Zhang, and R. A. Lamb. 1997. Influenza virus hemagglutinin and neuraminidase cytoplasmic tails control particle shape. EMBO J. 16:1236 1247. 6. Lamb, R. A., and R. M. Krug. 1996. Orthomyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication, p. 1353 1395. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa. 7. Mena, I., A. Vivo, E. Pérez, and A. Portela. 1996. Rescue of a synthetic chloramphenicol acetyltransferase RNA into influenza virus-like particles obtained from recombinant plasmids. J. Virol. 70:5016 5024. 8. Mitnaul, L. J., M. R. Castrucci, K. G. Murti, and Y. Kawaoka. 1996. The cytoplasmic tail of influenza A virus neuraminidase (NA) affects NA incorporation into virions, virion morphology, and virulence in mice but is not essential for virus replication. J. Virol. 70:873 879. 9. Naim, H. Y., and M. G. Roth. 1993. Basis for selective incorporation of glycoproteins into the influenza virus envelope. J. Virol. 67:4831 4841. 10. Neumann, G., M. R. Castrucci, and Y. Kawaoka. 1997. Nuclear import and export of influenza virus nucleoprotein. J. Virol. 71:9690 9700. 10a.Neumann, G., and G. Hobam. 1995. Mutational analysis of influenza virus promoter elements in vivo. J. Gen. Virol. 76:1709 1717. 11. Neumann, G., T. Watanabe, H. Ito, S. Watanabe, H. Goto, P. Gao, M. Hughes, D. R. Perez, R. Donis, E. Hoffmann, G. Hobom, and Y. Kawaoka. 1999. Generation of influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cdnas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:9345 9350. 12. Neumann, G., A. Zobel, and G. Hobom. 1994. RNA polymerase I-mediated expression of influenza viral RNA molecules. Virology 202:477 479. 13. Niwa, H., K. Yamamura, and J. Miyazaki. 1991. Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants by a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 108:193 200. 14. Perez, D. R., and R. O. Donis. 1998. The matrix 1 protein of influenza A virus inhibits the transcriptase activity of a model influenza reporter genome in vivo. Virology 249:52 61. 15. Rolls, M. M., P. Webster, N. H. Balba, and J. K. Rose. 1994. Novel infectious particles generated by expression of the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein from a self-replicating RNA. Cell 79:497 506. Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on December 17, 2018 by guest