UNSCEAR Recent and Future Programme of Work. Emil Bédi

Similar documents
CONTENTS NOTE TO THE READER...1 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS...3

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Other Radiation

Malcolm Crick, Secretary of UNSCEAR

IAEA Technical Meeting Amman, Jordan. Uranium Exploration and Mining Methods

For IACRS. May 13, Geneva. Christopher Clement ICRP Scientific Secretary

Introduction to UNSCEAR and the UNSCEAR report of 2016

Radiation Health Effects

Risks from Internal Emitters - misuse of equivalent and effective dose

Thank you Mr President and good morning

nuclear science and technology

ICRP Recommendations Evolution or Revolution? John R Cooper Main Commission

Radiation doses and cancer incidence (excluding thyroid cancer) due to the Chernobyl accident

Core Concepts in Radiation Exposure 4/10/2015. Ionizing Radiation, Cancer, and. James Seward, MD MPP

Application of the Commission's Recommendations for the Protection of People in

Annex V of Technical Volume 4 UNSCEAR ASSESSMENT OF THE DOSE TO THE PUBLIC

ICRP 128 ICRP ICRP ICRP 1928

Epidemiologic Studies. The Carcinogenic Effects of Radiation: Experience from Recent Epidemiologic Studies. Types of Epidemiologic Studies

EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION

2005 RECOMMENDATIONS OF ICRP

Where does the estimate of 29,000 cancers come from? Based on Table 12D from BEIR VII, + risk estimates for 56,900,000 patients

BEIR VII: Epidemiology and Models for Estimating Cancer Risk

The health risks of exposure to internal radiation. Korea National Assembly Seoul 22 nd August 2015

Strategy for protection of the public in radiation emergency. Short version (1 hour) Draft 0.2

EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION

The Epidemiology of Leukaemia and other Cancers in Childhood after Exposure to Ionising Radiation

CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE ON EYE DOSE & INTERNATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED TO: Presented To:

RADON RISK IN URANIUM MINING AND ICRP

SOURCES, EFFECTS AND RISKS OF IONIZING RADIATION

Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection

Epistemology of radiation protection

Sources of Data of Stochastic Effects of Radiation. Michael K O Connor, Ph.D. Dept. of Radiology, Mayo Clinic

Radiological Protection Countermeasures after TEPCO Fukushima NPP Accident -Who should play the role of risk communication-

Long-term Epidemiological Studies on Radiation Effects in A-bomb Survivors

Biological Effects of Radiation KJ350.

1. The Accident of Chernobyl Unit 4 of 1,000 MWe Graphite-Moderated Boiling Water Pressure Tube Reactor in 1986

An Open Letter To IAEA

Current and Planned Reports and Conferences of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation

IAEA ACTION PLAN ON NUCLEAR SAFETY REGARDING RADIATION PROTECTION AFTER FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ACCIDENT

ICRP: What It Does and Why Dr Jack Valentin

RERF s Views on Residual Radiation 8 December 2012 Radiation Effects Research Foundation. Introduction

Exposure to Radiation and Health Outcomes

STANDARDIZED RADIOGENIC CANCER RISK COEFFICIENTS: A REVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY PRESENTED IN FEDERAL GUIDANCE REPORT NO. 13

Introduction and overview of the activities of UNSCEAR

UNSCEAR ANNEX E RADON: SOURCES TO EFFECTS ASSESSMENT FOR RADON IN HOMES AND WORKPLACES

Internal dosimetry in emergency situations: challenges and recent developments

Annex X of Technical Volume 4 RADIATION AND HEALTH EFFECTS AND INFERRING RADIATION RISKS FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ACCIDENT

GUIDELINES ON IONISING RADIATION DOSE LIMITS AND ANNUAL LIMITS ON INTAKE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

Scientific bases for radiation protection today

IAEA s Technical Safety Review Services

Completion of the IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety and release of the report on the Fukushima Daiichi accident

ROUND TABLE 1: Health risk management Health examinations in different workplaces

Nuclear Plant Emergency Response. NPP Function and Malfunction: Historical Overview. Why is this training program important to you?

Joint RERF-ICRP Workshop on Health Risk of Radiation and the System of Radiological Protection Tokyo, Japan, 09 Oct 2016

Recommendations. Background

Thomas S. Tenforde. President CIRMS 2006 Conference. National Institute of Standards & Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland October 23-25, 2006

PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF RADIATION PROTECTION

TESTIMONY OF John D. Boice, Jr., Sc.D.

Executive Summary. Purpose and Rationale

Protecting the Health of Uranium Mine Workers: The Situation from the 1930s to the Present Day

Uncertainties on internal dosimetry

HEALTH PHYSICS PHYS 6700

Twelfth Annual Warren K. Sinclair Keynote Address

WHO's response to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident

The Fukushima Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety. Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, December 2012 CHAIRPERSON SUMMARIES

Implications of Recent Epidemiologic Studies for the Linear Nonthreshold Model and Radiation Protection

Emergency Preparedness and Response

Howard Dickson President Emeritus Health Physics Society

REPORT OF THE TECHNICAL MEETING: THE NEW DOSE LIMIT FOR THE LENS OF THE EYE IMPLICATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION VIENNA, 2-4 OCTOBER 2012

Radiation in Everyday Life

Role and Responsibility of Medical Staff in Nuclear Accident

Learning Objectives. Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection. Radiation Effects

IONIZING RADIATION, HEALTH EFFECTS AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES

Review of the report:

Ionizing Radiation. Alpha Particles CHAPTER 1

Everyday Radiation. David D. Dixon HDT Rally Hutchinson, KS October 15, 2014

Hiroshima / Fukushima: Gender Matters in the Atomic Age

Evening session 1 Stakeholder platform opportunity 18:30-20:00 IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

Potential worker and public health impacts from the Fukushima accident

MELODI statement 2018 Gap analysis

Radiation related cancer risk & benefit/risk assessment for screening procedures

Epidemiological Studies on the Atomic-bomb Survivors (Handout)

Summary of ICRP Recommendations on Radon

Creating capacity legislation & regulation control of exposure emergency preparedness through technical cooperation

An update: Dealing with radiation as a hazard. WAJ Meintjes MBChB; DOM; FCPHM(SA) Occ Med; MMed (Occ Med)

Infrastructure of the Brazilian Government in Radioprotection Education

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

Internal Dosimetry of Human Brain for 99m tc and 131 I Using Nuclear Imaging in Bangladesh

Conception and design of the National Database of the Individual Dose of the Republic of Cuba

Epidemiology of the Atomic Bomb Survivors and Chernobyl to Fukushima Accidents Toshiko Kato

Recent Progress in Radiation Dosimetry for Epidemiology and Radiological Protection. John Harrison ICRP Committee 2

Public and Worker Health Impacts from the Fukushima Nuclear Plant Accident Thomas McKone, PhD & James Seward, MD, MPP

Radiological health effects of the Chernobyl accident: estimation of radiation risks

Radiation Metrics and the Media Confusion Fuels Public Fears

Comparison of physical and biological dosimetry for internal emitters

SOURCES, EFFECTS AND RISKS OF IONIZING RADIATION

IAEA Safety Standards for Emergency Preparedness and Response: Focus on criteria for radionuclides in food, milk and drinking water

Portugal and the IAEA Technical Cooperation. Pedro Vaz and Sofia Guedes Vaz

ORAMED training module: Optimizing radiation protection in interventional radiology and nuclear medicine

15 December 2012 Fukushima Prefecture, Japan

Transcription:

UNSCEAR Recent and Future Programme of Work Emil Bédi 5th MELODI Workshop Brussels, 8 October 2013

Recently published documents 2012: "Biological mechanisms of radiation actions at low doses. A white paper to guide the Scientific Committee's future programme of work" http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/biological_mechanisms_wp_12-57831.pdf 2010 : UNSCEAR 2010 Report: "Summary of low-dose radiation effects on health". http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2010/unscear_2010_report_m.pdf

Documents to be published Two substantive scientific documents: Assessment of the levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 in Fukushima (80+ experts from 18 countries and 5 int. organizations involved) Effects of radiation exposure on children

Effects of radiation exposure on children 2006 UNSCEAR Report to the General Assembly:...estimates of lifetime cancer risk for those exposed as children were uncertain and might be a factor of 2-3 times higher than estimates for a population exposed at all ages (based on lifetime risk projection model combining the risks of all tumour types together). Epidemiological studies reported in the literature vary with regard to the specific age groups they consider. Differences between children and adults - the absorbed dose from a given exposure due to their smaller bodies (organs closer together, less shielded, closer to the ground etc...) Children = infants, children and adolescents (effects of in utero exposure not included) Wide range of doses, variable dose rates, whole and partial body exposure were considered.

Effects of radiation exposure on children (cont.) 23 different cancer types reviewed Findings: tumour incidence in children is more variable than in adults and depends on the tumour type, age and gender For about 25% of these cancer types, children were clearly more radiosensitive. These include leukaemia, and thyroid, skin. For about 15 per cent of the cancer types (e.g. colon cancer), children appear to have about the same radiosensitivity as adults. For about 10 per cent of cancer types (e.g. lung cancer), children appear less sensitive to external radiation exposure than adults. For about 20% of cancer types (e.g. for oesophagus cancer), the data are too weak to draw a conclusion regarding any differences in risk. For about 30% of cancer types (e.g. for Hodgkin s disease, and prostate, rectum and uterus cancer), there is only a weak or no relationship between radiation exposure and risk at any age of exposure. At present there are no statistically sufficient projections of lifetime risk for specific cancer types following exposure at young ages. Estimates currently used do not adequately capture the known variations.

Effects of radiation exposure on Deterministic effects: children (cont.) Direct effects due to high (either acute or fractionated) doses - the differences in outcome between exposure in childhood and in adulthood are complex and can be explained by the interaction of different tissues and mechanisms. The difference between the radiation sensitivity of children and that of adults for deterministic effects in a specific organ is often not the same as the difference for cancer induction. There are some instances in which childhood exposure poses more risk than adulthood exposure (e.g. risk of cognitive defects, cataracts and thyroid nodules). There are other instances where the risk appears to be about the same (e.g. risk of neuroendocrine abnormalities), and there are a few instances where children s tissues are more resistant (e.g. lungs and ovaries) Conclusion: generalizations should be avoided and attention should be directed to specifics of the exposure, age at exposure, absorbed dose to certain tissues and the particular endpoints of interest.

Other documents in progress Biological effects of selected internal emitters (tritium and uranium) Development of an evaluation of medical exposures Cancer epidemiology after low dose-rate exposure to environmental radiation Methodology for estimating human exposures due to radioactive discharges Radiation exposures from electricity generation UNEP booklet

Biological effects of selected internal emitters Selected internal emitters: tritium and uranium. More radionuclides were requested. Document includes: Sources and levels, Characteristics, Dosimetry, Biological effects, Epidemiological studies (U) The assessment of doses from intakes of other radionuclides required the use of biokinetic and dosimetric models (ICRP models). Questions: Are the models reasonable? Are the ICRP values of wr adequate to reflect RBE? Do the biological/epidemiological data support equivalence of risk for internal and external radiation sources? Radon is the only one for which epidemiological information had become available.

Development of an evaluation of medical exposures Exposures of patients undergoing medical procedures represented the most significant source of artificial exposure to ionizing radiation, Technology and practices in this area were changing rapidly and Medical exposures - thematic priority for the period 2009 2013 Goals: to provide reliable and comprehensive estimate of worldwide dose distributions and trends to provide insight into the main sources of exposure, the most significant exposure situations and the main factors influencing dose distributions and trends to facilitate evaluation of the impact of new techniques or technologies, of regulatory changes and of risk management programmes; to identify emerging issues and opportunities for improvement that may warrant more attention and scrutiny;

Development of an evaluation of medical exposures (cont.) Collaboration with international and intergovernmental organizations IAEA and WHO etc. The arrangements for the periodic collection and exchange of data on radiation exposures of the general public, workers and, in particular, patients Using electronic solutions to collect data; Establish national UNSCEAR contact points; Establish an expert group. The new questionnaire deals separately with (a) diagnostic radiology and image-guided interventional radiology; (b) nuclear medicine; and (c) radiotherapy. For all categories, information on age and sex distribution will be collected in a separate worksheet to keep the questionnaire as simple as possible A web-based questionnaire (based on EXCEL) on medical exposures has been developed and is being tested (will use automatic online upload system). A test phase for data collection by 2014. First draft of the medical exposures report by 2015. Future cooperation on basic research on medical exposures will progressively be ensured by MELODI.

Cancer epidemiology after low dose-rate exposure to environmental radiation Past UNSCEAR reports have not fully discussed the direct evidence of health effects due to low-dose-rate exposure. Document will not include the epidemiological studies of radon exposure since they have already been well documented. Studies without individual doses were excluded. The main epidemiological studies include those of residents in the areas of relatively HNBR levels compared to their respective control groups Yangjiang, China and Karunagappally, India and of residents of the places where the exposure to radiation of man-made origin has been relatively high for prolonged periods regions along the Techa River, the Russian Federation. To date, these studies have produced markedly different findings concerning the cancer risks associated with low-dose-rate radiation exposure: the Chinese and Indian studies provide no evidence of increased cancer risks for total doses up to 500 mgy, while the estimate of cancer-risk from the Russian study has no significant differences from the data on the survivors of the atomic bombings. Other high-background areas (monazite sands in Brazil, the hot springs in Iran, the contaminated nuclear testing sites in Semipalatinsk, contaminated areas due to the Chernobyl accident, and buildings with 60Co-contaminated rebars in Taiwan, China have more uncertainties (e.g. dosimetry) were not included.

Methodology for estimating human exposures due to radioactive discharges The methodology for use in future assessments of the impact of discharges from nuclear installations on members of the public. Assessments of the exposures due to the various stages of the nuclear fuel cycle in order to determine the underlying trends with time. Dose calculations due to atmospheric and hydrospheric discharges. The radionuclides of particular interest are 3H, 14C, 85Kr and 129I are also included. The scope of the review was subsequently extended to include discharges from other energy sources, in order to ensure consistency in the assessment of radiation exposures from all forms of electricity generation.

Radiation exposures from electricity generation Update of previous UNSCEAR assessments of the radiation exposures due to electricity generation: (a) to reflect changes in technology; (b) to clarify the timescales of the impacts; and (c) to update the understanding of exposure pathways Overall assessment of the radiological impact of the life cycles for fossil, nuclear and renewable fuels for electricity generation Doses to exposed groups at a distance of 5 km from a 1 GW facility for each type of energy source Doses to exposed groups at a distance of 5 km from a mine with production related to a 1 GW facility Collective and per caput doses to the world s population for each type of energy source.

Strategic plan 2014-2019 To increase awareness and deepen understanding among decision-makers, the scientific community and civil society with regard to levels of exposure to ionizing radiation and the related health and environmental effects as a sound basis for informed decision making on radiation-related issues Thematic priorities for the period: a) the global impact of energy production (including follow-up of the consequences of the 2011 accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power station) and of the rapidly expanding use of ionizing radiation in medical diagnosis and treatment; (b) radiation effects at low doses and low dose rates.