Cardiogenic Shock Protocol

Similar documents
A National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (CSI):

Ray Matthews MD Professor of Clinical Medicine Chief of Cardiology University of Southern California

COURSE OFFERINGS. Committed to Improving Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock and Protected PCI Through Excellence in Education.

Management of Cardiogenic Shock. Dr Stephen Pettit, Consultant Cardiologist

Management of Acute Shock and Right Ventricular Failure

Impella Program. Protocols & Tools. Recovering hearts. Saving lives.

TREATMENT OF HIGHER RISK PATIENTS INTRODUCTION TO PROTECTED PCI WITH IMPELLA. IMP v4

Recognizing the Need to Support A Failing Right Ventricular Role of Mechanical Support

Cath Lab Essentials : LV Assist Devices for Hemodynamic Support (IABP, Impella, Tandem Heart, ECMO)

MCS for Acute Heart Failure Eric Adler MD Associate Professor of Medicine Medical Director Cardiac Transplant

The Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: When to Utilize

Bridging With Percutaneous Devices: Tandem Heart and Impella

AllinaHealthSystem 1

Assist Devices in STEMI- Intra-aortic Balloon Pump

Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation- Supportive Data for a Role in Cardiogenic Shock ( Be Still My Friend )

Recovering Hearts. Saving Lives.

Right Ventricular Failure: Prediction, Prevention and Treatment

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Case - Advanced HF and Shock (INTERMACS 1)

Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Right Ventricular Support Devices

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Cardiogenic Shock. Carlos Cafri,, MD

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock. 24 th Annual San Diego Heart Failure Symposium Ryan R Reeves, MD FSCAI

Hemodynamic Monitoring and Circulatory Assist Devices

A case of post myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture CHRISTOFOROS KOBOROZOS, MD

Andrew Civitello MD, FACC

Rationale for Prophylactic Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Circulatory Support: From IABP to LVAD

The Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock Knowledge Gaps & Opportunities

Rhondalyn C. McLean. 2 ND YEAR RESEARCH ELECTIVE RESIDENT S JOURNAL Volume VII, A. Study Purpose and Rationale

Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction

CARDIOGENIC SHOCK. Antonio Pesenti. Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo Monza (MI)

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock The Cardiologist s view ACCA Masterclass 2017

Definition. Low-cardiac-output state resulting in life threatening end-organ hypoperfusion. Criteria: MAP 30 mm Hg lower than baseline)

8th Emirates Cardiac Society Congress in collaboration with ACC Middle East Conference Dubai: October Acute Coronary Syndromes

Introduction to Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support

Adult Echocardiography Examination Content Outline

Indications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014

Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Counterpulsation. John N. Nanas, MD, PhD. Professor and Head, 3 rd Cardiology Dept, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

I Was Too Late With Device Placement

Cardiogenic Shock and Initiatives to Reduce Mortality

Disclosures. Objectives 10/11/17. Short Term Mechanical Circulatory Support for Advanced Cardiogenic Shock. I have no disclosures to report

Acute heart failure: ECMO Cardiology & Vascular Medicine 2012

LV Distension and ECLS Lungs

ECMO as a bridge to durable LVAD therapy. Jonathan Haft, MD Department of Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

Cardiogenic Shock in Acute MI

Mechanical Cardiac Support in Acute Heart Failure. Michael Felker, MD, MHS Associate Professor of Medicine Director of Heart Failure Research

Outcomes for 15,259 US Patients With Acute MI Cardiogenic Shock (AMICS) Supported With Impella

Mechanical Cardiac Support and Cardiac Transplant: The Role for Echocardiography

Ventricular Assisting Devices in the Cathlab. Unrestricted

Management of Cardiogenic shock. Prof. Christian JM Vrints

PUMP FAILURE COMPLICATING AMI: ISCHAEMIC VSR

Introduction. Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring. Determinants of Cardiovascular Function. Cardiovascular System. Hemodynamic Monitoring

Index. K Knobology, TTE artifact, image resolution, ultrasound, 14

Antonio Colombo. Centro Cuore Columbus and S. Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Miracor Symposium. Speaker: 15. Parigi: May 16-19, 2017

How to do Primary Angioplasty. - Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

ECMO AND SHORT-TERM SUPPORT:

Extra Corporeal Life Support for Acute Heart failure

Update on Mechanical Circulatory Support. AATS May 5, 2010 Toronto, ON Canada

Cardiogenic Shock. Dr. JPS Henriques. Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam The Netherlands

CARDIOGENIC SHOCK 2017 Eric Adler MD Associate Clinical Professor, UCSD

Planned, Short-Term RVAD During Durable LVAD Implant: Indications and Management

Echo assessment of patients with an ECMO device

Ramani GV et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:180-95

ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction & Cardiogenic Shock. - What Should We Do?

Cath Lab Essentials: Basic Hemodynamics for the Cath Lab and ICU

Repair or Replacement

Medical Management of Acute Heart Failure

Guideline compliance, utilization trends

Impella Ins & Outs. CarVasz November :45 12:15

IABP to prevent pulmonary edema under VA-ECMO

Οξύ στεφανιαίο σύνδρομο και καρδιογενής καταπληξία. Επεμβατική προσέγγιση. Σωτήριος Πατσιλινάκος Κωνσταντοπούλειο Γ.Ν. Ν. Ιωνίας

4/22/2016 Updated. AllinaHealthSystem. Cardiogenic Shock: Definition. No Disclosures. Cardiogenic Shock: Declining (But Still High) Case Fatality Rate

ECMO as a Bridge to Heart Transplant in the Era of LVAD s.

Evaluation of the Right Ventricle in Candidates for Right Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Protocol Identifier Subject Identifier Visit Description. [Y] Yes [N] No. [Y] Yes [N] N. If Yes, admission date and time: Day Month Year

7. Echocardiography Appropriate Use Criteria (by Indication)

Mechanics of Cath Lab Support Devices

Rationale for Left Ventricular Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

The Optimal Team for 24/7 CCU shock management

Matching Patient and Pump in the New Era of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support

Echocardiographic Cardiovascular Risk Stratification: Beyond Ejection Fraction

Complications of VAD therapy - RV failure

Drs. Rottman, Salloum, Campbell, Muldowney, Hong, Bagai, Kronenberg

Mechanics of Cath Lab Support Devices

LVAD Complications, Recovery

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Echocardiography as a diagnostic and management tool in medical emergencies

ASE 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

To ECMO Or Not To ECMO Challenges of venous arterial ECMO. Dr Emily Granger St Vincent s Hospital Darlinghurst NSW

Hemodynamic Monitoring

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

Relax and Learn At the Farm 2012

CENTRAL ECMO WHEN AND HOW? RANJIT JOHN, MD UNIVERSITY OF MINESOTA

Surgical Options for Temporary MCS

Intra-operative Echocardiography: When to Go Back on Pump

Transcription:

Cardiogenic Shock Protocol

Impella Devices Best Practices in AMI Cardiogenic Shock Identify 1-3 SBP < 90 mmhg or on inotropes /pressors Cold, clammy, tachycardia Lactate elevated > 2 mmoi /L Stabilize Early Reduce Door to Unloading Time (DTU) Impella support pre-pci 8-10 Reduce inotropes/pressors 11,12 Cardiogenic etiology evaluation EKG (STEMI / NSTEMI) Echocardiography 4 If available, PA catheter, cardiac output, CPO, CI PCWP, SvO 2 5-7 Complete Revascularization Per guidelines 13,14 Assess for Myocardial Recovery (Weaning and Transfer Protocols) Cardiac Output Cardiac Power Output Urine Output Lactate Inotropes Myocardial Recovery 15,16 No Recovery Escalate (and Ambulate) or Transfer Ongoing Left Heart Failure Assess for Right Heart Failure See back of document for list of references.

Identify: Minimize Duration of Shock Suspect Cardiogenic Shock See Confirm CGS Diagnosis reassess every 1-2 hours if criteria not initially met See Activate Heart Recovery Team/ Cardiac Cath Lab Suspect Shock Consider any of these criteria: Cool, clammy, pale skin Confusion/anxiety Rapid, shallow breathing SBP < 90 mmhg > 30 min Inotrope/vasopressor and/or IABP to maintain SBP > 90 mmhg Decrease in urine output (<0.5 cc/kg/h) Serum lactate level > 2 mmoi/l Diagnose CGS STEMI/Non-STEMI ECG ST segment abnormalities Troponin ECHO (assess cardiac function) If PA Catheter (PAC) available: Cardiac Index (CI) < 2.2 L/min/m 2 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) > 18 mmhg Cardiac power output (CPO) < 0.6 watts

Stabilize Early and Complete Revascularization BEST PRACTICE Assess Hemodynamics: LVEDP or PAC If sustained hypotension (SBP < 90mmHg) for > 30 min OR CI < 2.2 with LVEDP or PCWP > 18 mmhg, consider mechanical circulatory support Reassess Hemodynamics: PAC (if not done initially) CPO=MAP CO/451 W PAPi = spap-dpap/ra CO, cardiac output; CPO, cardiac power output; dpap, diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure;pac, pulmonary arterial catheter; PAPi, pulmonary artery pulsatility index;ra, right arterial pressure; spap, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure. Soverow J, Lee MS. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014;26(12):659-667. Activate Cardiac Cath Lab Access Assess Hemodynamics Impella 2.5 or Impella CP Devices NO Begin Weaning Catecholamines* Acute MI? Coronary Angiogram with PCI Reassess Hemodynamics BEST PRACTICE Access: 1. Femoral arterial access using micropuncture with image guidance (ultrasound and/or fluoroscopy) 1 2. Angiography via 4F micropuncture dilator to confirm puncture site & vessel size 3. Place appropriately sized (5 or 6 Fr) arterial sheath 4. Obtain venous access (femoral or internal jugular) If femoral arterial anatomy suitable and no contraindication, place, or escalate to (if IABP already in place), Impella 2.5 or Impella CP devices. YES *If consistent with overall hemodynamic management PCI: Coronary angiography and PCI with goal of complete revascularization

Reassess Prior to Discharge from Cath Lab Reassess Hemodynamics via PAC prior to Discharge from the Cath Lab: 1. Cardiac Power Output (CPO) MAP CO/451 W 2. pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index (PAPi) SPAP-dPAP/RA RV Dysfunction: Right-sided MCS (Impella RP device) CPO < 0.6 PAPi 1.5 > 1.5 RV Preserved: Escalate MCS or consider transfer to LVAD/Transplant Center CPO > 0.6 PAPi 1.5 > 1.5 RV Dysfunction: Right-sided MCS (Impella RP ) VA or VV-ECMO: Recommend maintaining Impella at low speed for LV decompression Anderson MB, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1549-1560. Persistent Hypoxemia? PaO 2 <55 on 100% FiO 2 YES NO Admit to ICU to maximize supportive care and to actively assess for myocardial recovery RV Failure as defined by Recover Right 1 : CI < 2.2 L/min/m 2 (despite continuous infusion of 1 high dose inotrope, ie, da/dobutamine 10 ug/kg/min or equivalent) and any of the following: 1. CVP > 15 mmhg, or 2. CVP/PCQP or LAP ratio > 0.63, or 3. RV dysfunction on TTE (TAPSE score 14 mm)

Escalation, Weaning, & Transfer Assess for Myocardial Recovery (At least every 12 hours) Improving Clinical, Echocardiographic & Hemodynamic parameters (concordant): Cardiac output CPO Urine output Lactate Inotropes low does/discontinued Adequate Ramp test Mixed picture Clinical, Echocardiographic & Hemodynamic parameters (discordant): Some parameters are improving Pressors lowered but not discontinued Fails ramp test Worsening Clinical, Echocardiographic & Hemodynamic parameters (concordant): Cardiac output CPO Urine output Lactate Inotropes dependent Absent pulsatility Myocardial Recovery Inadequate Recovery No Recovery Escalate (& Ambulate) or Transfer Wean & Explant Impella device (After a minimum of 48h) Continue Impella device support & frequent clinical reassessment Failure to recover within 48-72h, consider escalation or durable VAD/ transplant See Escalate or Transfer Protocol

No Recovery: Escalate (& Ambulate) or Transfer RV Failure as defined by Recover Right 1 : CI < 2.2 L/min/m 2 (despite continuous infusion of 1 high dose inotrope, ie, da/dobutamine 10 ug/kg/min or equivalent) and any of the following: 1. CVP > 15 mmhg, or 2. CVP/PCQP or LAP ratio > 0.63, or 3. RV dysfunction on TTE (TAPSE score 14 mm) No Recovery Escalate (& Ambulate) or Transfer Guidance by RHC is Critical CPO remains < 0.6 After 24 hours Worsening / Not Improving Clinical, Echocardiographic & Hemodynamic parameters (concordant): Cardiac output CPO Urine output Lactate Inotropes dependent Absent pulsatility PAPi 0.9 (RV Failure) 0.9 < PAPi 1.5 (RV Dysfunction) PAPi > 1.5 (Acceptable RV Function) Biventricular support with Impella RP on the right-side (transfer if not available) Consider supporting the right-side with Impella RP device (transfer if not available) Consider left-side escalation with Impella 5.0 device (transfer if not available) Anderson MB, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1549-1560. CPO = (MAP CO)/451. PAPi = spap - dpap/ra.

Notes Section

Notes Section

All Left-Sided Indications Important Safety Information INDICATIONS FOR USE Protected PCI The Impella 2.5 and Impella CP Systems are temporary ( 6 hours) ventricular support devices indicated for use during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed in elective or urgent, hemodynamically stable patients with severe coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, when a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, has determined high-risk PCI is the appropriate therapeutic option. Use of the Impella 2.5 and Impella CP Systems in these patients may prevent hemodynamic instability, which can result from repeat episodes of reversible myocardial ischemia that occur during planned temporary coronary occlusions and may reduce peri- and post-procedural adverse events. Cardiogenic Shock The Impella 2.5, Impella CP, Impella 5.0, and Impella LD Catheters, in conjunction with the Automated Impella Controller (collectively, Impella System Therapy ), are temporary ventricular support devices intended for short term use ( 4 days for the Impella 2.5 and Impella CP, and 6 days for the Impella 5.0, and Impella LD) and indicated for the treatment of ongoing cardiogenic shock that occurs immediately (< 48 hours) following acute myocardial infarction or open heart surgery as a result of isolated left ventricular failure that is not responsive to optimal medical management and conventional treatment measures (including volume loading and use of pressors and inotropes, with or without IABP). The intent of Impella System Therapy is to reduce ventricular work and to provide the circulatory support necessary to allow heart recovery and early assessment of residual myocardial function. Important Risk Information for Impella devices CONTRAINDICATIONS The Impella 2.5, Impella CP, Impella 5.0 and Impella LD are contraindicated for use with patients experiencing any of the following conditions: Mural thrombus in the left ventricle; Presence of a mechanical aortic valve or heart constrictive device; Aortic valve stenosis/calcification (equivalent to an orifice area of 0.6 cm2 or less); Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (echocardiographic assessment graded as +2); Severe peripheral arterial disease precluding placement of the Impella System; Significant right heart failure*; Combined cardiorespiratory failure*; Presence of an Atrial or Ventricular Septal Defect (including post-infarct VSD)*; Left ventricular rupture*; Cardiac tamponade* * This condition is a contraindication for the cardiogenic shock indication only. POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENTS Acute renal dysfunction, Aortic valve injury, Bleeding, Cardiogenic shock, Cerebral vascular accident/stroke, Death, Hemolysis, Limb ischemia, Myocardial infarction, Renal failure, Thrombocytopenia and Vascular injury In addition to the risks above, there are other WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS associated with Impella devices. Visit www.protectedpci.com/hcp/information/isi and www.cardiogenicshock.com/hcp/information/isi to learn more.

Impella RP Indication Important Safety Information INDICATIONS FOR USE The Impella RP System is indicated for providing temporary right ventricular support for up to 14 days in patients with a body surface area 1.5 m2, who develop acute right heart failure or decompensation following left ventricular assist device implantation, myocardial infarction, heart transplant, or open-heart surgery. Important Risk Information for Impella RP System CONTRAINDICATIONS The Impella RP System is contraindicated for patients with the following conditions: Disorders of the pulmonary artery wall that would preclude placement or correct positioning of the Impella RP device. Mechanical valves, severe valvular stenosis or valvular regurgitation of the tricuspid or pulmonary valve. Mural thrombus of the right atrium or vena cava. Anatomic conditions precluding insertion of the pump. Presence of a vena cava filter or caval interruption device, unless there is clear access from the femoral vein to the right atrium that is large enough to accommodate a 22 Fr catheter. POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENTS The potential adverse effects (eg, complications) associated with the use of the Impella RP System: Arrhythmia, Atrial fibrillation, Bleeding, Cardiac tamponade, Cardiogenic shock, Death, Device malfunction, Hemolysis, Hepatic failure, Insertion site infection, Perforation, Phlegmasia cerulea dolens (a severe form of deep venous thrombosis), Pulmonary valve insufficiency, Respiratory dysfunction, Sepsis, Thrombocytopenia, Thrombotic vascular (non-central nervous system) complication, Tricuspid valve injury, Vascular injury, Venous thrombosis, Ventricular fibrillation and/or tachycardia. In addition to the risks above, there are other WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS associated with Impella RP. Visit www.abiomed.com/impella/impella-rp to learn more.

References 1. Reyentovich A, et al. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13(8):481-492. 2. Hochman JS, et al. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(9):625-634. 3. Rihal CS, et.al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(19):e7-e26. 4. Picard MH, et al. Circulation. 2003;107(2):279-284. 5. Cohen MG, et al. Am J Med. 2005;118(5):482-488. 6. Kahwash R, et al. Cardiol Clin. 2011;29(2):281-288. 7.Chatterjee K. Circulation 2009;119(1):147-152. 8. O Neill WW, et al. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27(1):1-11. 9. Joseph SM, et al. J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Jun;29(3):248-56. 10. Schroeter MR, et al. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15. [Epub ahead of print] 11. Samuels LE, et al. J Card Surg. 1999;14(4):288-293. 12. De Backer D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):779-789. 13. O Gara PT, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):e78-e140. 14. Steg PG, et al. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2569-2619. 15. Casassus F, et al. J Interv Cardiol. 2015;28(1):41-50. 16. Lemaire A, et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(1):133-138. 17. Anderson MB, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1549-1560. IMP-1464-16.v4