Efficacy of Methyl-eugenol as Male Attractant for Dacus dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Similar documents
Population Dynamics of Three Species of Genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in BARI, Chakwal (Punjab)

Diversity and abundance of Dacinae fruit flies (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae) in Chini 2, Runchang and Sungai Bebar, Pahang, Peninsular Malaysia

Relationship between Population Fluctuation of Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel and Abiotic Factors in Yezin, Myanmar

Ecology and Sustainable Management of Major Bactrocera Fruit Flies in Goa, India

The Threat of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly1 to American Agriculture and Efforts Being Made to Counter This Threat2 3

Curre nt Status of the Solanaceous Fruit Fly Control Project in Yonaguni Island. Abstract

Rearing Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

NAPPO Regional Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (RSPM)

PILOT APPLICATION OF STERILE INSECT TECHNIQUE FOR THE ORIENTAL FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA PHJLIPPJNENSIS, IN NAOWAY ISLET

Population dynamics of fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species associated with mango in the Guinea Savanna Agro-Ecological zone of Ghana

Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Genetic Sexing: All-male Sterile Fly Releases in Hawaii

Comparative Toxicity of Certain Pesticides to Peach Fruit Fly, Bactrocera zonata Saunders (Diptera: Tephritidae) under Laboratory Conditions

The Hawaii Fruit Fly Area-Wide Pest Management Program: Accomplishments and Future Directions

Bactrocera dorsalis : Current status JH VENTER NPPOZA MAY 2017

Full-text Available Online at

Volume 1 Issue 2 April-June,2012 DOSE OF CUE- LURE FOR SUPPRESSION OF MELON FLY POPULATION IN PUMPKIN CHAUDHARY*, F. K. AND PATEL, G. M.

[Attachment] Survey guidelines for major fruit flies

Fruit Fly Surveillance in Nepal

All male strains and chemical stimulants: Two ways to boost sterile males in SIT programs. Abstract

Capture of Bactrocera Males (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Parapheromone-Baited Traps: A Comparison of Liquid versus Solid Formulations

FRUIT FLY OF CUCURBITS IN SEMI ARID REGION OF NORTH GUJARAT CHAUDHARY, F. K. *

REGIONAL STANDARDS FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES GUIDELINES FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF NON-HOST STATUS OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES TO TEPHRITID FRUIT FLIES

EFFICACY OF PROTEIN BAIT SPRAYS IN CONTROLLING FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) INFESTING ANGLED LUFFA AND BITTER GOURD IN THAILAND

Scientific Note. Solanum torvum (Solanaceae), a New Host of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii

Grant T. McQuate 1, Aimé H. Bokonon-Ganta 2, and Eric B. Jang 1

Demographic parameters and biotic factors of two Dacini species, Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus, on Réunion Island

Efficacy of Protein Bait Sprays in Controlling Melon Fruit Fly [Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)] in Vegetable Agro-ecosystems

whereas the fourth inhibitor was extracted and semi purified from cabbage (Brassica oleracae) in the Insect Physiology Laboratory of the Department of

ISPM No. 26 ESTABLISHMENT OF PEST FREE AREAS FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) (2006)

VAPOUR HEAT TREATMENT AGAINST THREE SPECIES OF FRUIT FLIES IN MANGO DEDONG

ACTION PLAN. for. CUELURE ATTRACTED FRUIT FLIES including the Melon Fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)

Fruit Sampling Guidelines for Area-Wide Fruit Fly Programmes

ISPM No. 30 ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) (2008)

DETERMINATION OF FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) INFESTATION IN GUAVA, PEACH AND BITTER GOURD ORCHARDS IN KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA.

INFLUENCE OF WEATHER PARAMETERS ON FRUIT FLY TRAP CATCHES INDHARWAD, KARNATAKA

The sterile insect technique for control of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), in mango orchards in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand

BIONOMICS OF BACTROCERA DORSALIS (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) AN IMPORTANT PEST OF MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA) IN JAMMU (J & K) J. S. Tara and Madhvi Gupta*

CHEMICAL CONTROL OF WALNUT HUSK FLY

Population Density and Percentage of Infestation with Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) in Two Iraqi Provinces

POPULATION DYNAMICS AND MOVEMENT OF

Name change of the invasive fruit fly and update on its pest status in South Africa

Queensland fruit fly responses (2014)

Larval survival and development of the peach fruit moth, Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae), in picked and unpicked apple fruits

Establishment of areas of low pest prevalence for fruit flies (Tephritidae)

ABUNDANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF FRUIT FLIES ON PEACH THROUGH MALE ANNIHILATION TECHNIQUE (MAT) USING METHYL EUGENOL BASED MINERAL WATER BOTTLE TRAPS

VQ612 Determination of Fruit Fly Host Status for Red Tiger, Shadow, Gemini & Baby-lee Watermelons. MD Jess, RJ Corcoran QDPI

Reproductive Biology of Fopius vandenboschi (Fullaway) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in the Laboratory

COMMUNICATION (II) T.K. MAK and B.T. OH Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor.

AN ATTEMPT AT THE ERADICATION OF THE ORIENTAL FRUIT FLY, Bactrocera dorsalis (HENDEL) FROM MAURITIUS

The fruit flies are the classical international

Pheromone Based Mating Disruption

Efficacy of different lures in male annihilation technique of peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Sperm Precedence of Irradiated Mediterranean Fruit Fly Males (Diptera: Tephritidae)

EVALUATION OF NEW AND EXISTING INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF WALNUT HUSK FLY 2012

FRUIT FLY LURE AND TRAP FOR QUEENSLAND FRUIT FLY (Bactrocera tryoni) TECHNICAL MANUAL Innovation. Quality. Solutions.

Eco-friendly modules for management of fruit fly, B. cucurbitae infesting sponge gourd

INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MONITORING IN LEPIDOPTERAN COTTON PESTS

Area-wide integrated pest management of tephritid fruit flies using the sterile insect technique

[fll ~ft:

Guava Fruit Fly, Bactrocera correcta (Bezzi) (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae) 1

ONGOING PROJECT REPORT YEAR 1/3 WTFRC Project # CH

J. Bio.Env. Sci. 2018

Evaluation of Communication Disruption Method Using Synthetic Sex Pheromone to Suppress Diamondback Moth Infestations

Bactrocera invadens: Current status and control

Successful Utilization of the Area-Wide Approach for the Management of Fruit Flies in Hawaii

BIOLOGY OF GALL FLY, Procontarina matteiana (Kieffer & Cecconi) ON MANGO *JADHAV, K. M., PATEL, R. K. AND PATEL S. A.

ATTACHMENT 5 CONSISTENCY CORRECTIONS IN RELATION TO HARMONIZATION OF FRUIT FLY STANDARDS

PT 21: Vapour heat treatment for Bactrocera melanotus and Bactrocera xanthodes on Carica papaya

Genetic Control Tactic Against Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Insect to Escape Destruction of Perishable Horticulture Crops

Evaluation of modified waste brewer s yeast as a protein source for the control of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)

SEASONAL VARIATIONS OF MELON FLY, Bactrocera cucurbitae (COQUILLETT) (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) IN DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL HABITATS OF BANGLADESH

Fruit fly management practices on tropical fruit in Africa

Fruits are grown on 0.64 million hectares in

USDA-APHIS, Ahiki Street, Waimanalo, HI 96795, and Center for Conservation Research and Training, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

A New Eye Mutant, apricot, of the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis

Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir , INDIA 2

Control of Codling Moth and Other Pear Arthropods with Novaluron Evaluation of Novaluron for Phytotoxicity to Pear and Apple 2004

ESTABLISHMENT OF PEST FREE AREAS FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE)

Mass Trapping for the Control of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata in Citrus Orchards in Tunisia

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTION OF PEACH FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA ZONATA (SAUND.)(DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)

Study some biological aspects of peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae) In laboratory and field

PT 7: Irradiation treatment for fruit flies of the family Tephritidae (generic)

The Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Central America

Ceratitis capitata Wiedmann (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Trapping Records of Fruit Fly Pest Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Oahu (Hawaiian Islands): Analysis of Spatial Population Trends

Mediterranean fruit fly

Bionomics of Fruit Fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on Cucumber under Laboratory Condition

inside the insectary were 23.5±1.2 and 25.7±0.1oC and 74.5±0.4 and

Comparison of local fruit flies attractant with imported attractants (Methyl Eugenol & Cue Lure) in guava, peach

Reduced rates of pheromone applications for control of codling moth (Cydia pomonella) in pear and walnut orchards

EFFICACY OF SOME BOTANICALS AS INSECTICIDES ON THE MELON FLY, BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE (COQUILLETT) (DIPTERA : TEPHRITIDAE)

of Dacus dorsalis1 and Ceratitis capitata1'2'3

Effect of Natural and Artificial Diets on the Life History Parameters of Melon Fruit Fly Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)

Detection of Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): Performance of Trimedlure Relative to Capilure and Enriched Ginger Root Oil

Gamma Irradiation Effects on Reproductive Potential and Egg-Viability of the Housefly Musca domestica

Todd E. Shelly, Jon Nishimoto, and Rick Kurashima USDA-APHIS, Ahiki Street, Waimanalo, HI 96795;

ORIENTATIONAL EFFECT OF AQUEOUS LEAF EXTRACT OF CITRUS AURANTIFOLIA ON HOUSEFLY, MUSCA DOMESTICA (DIPTERA:MUSCIDAE)

Determining Impact of Third Generation Codling Moth, and Emergence Pattern of Overwintered Moths

Transcription:

Pertanika 3(2), 108-112 (1980) Efficacy of Methyl-eugenol as Male Attractant for Dacus dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae). A. GHA BRAHM and A. GHAN HASHM Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Keywords: Methyl eugenol; FruitflYi DaCtis dorsalis,. Carambola Orchard. RNGKASAN Dacus dorsalis ialah spesies lalat buah yang terbanyak (99.8%) di dusun belimbing besi. Tahap populasi didapati berkorelasi (r = 0.56) dengan kadar hujan. Buah belimbing mula diserang apabila umur meningkat 29 hari. Kajian di makmal tentang daya penarik methyl eugenol terhadap tiga spesis lalat buah menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbezaan yang bererti diantara Dacus dorsalis dan D. umbrosus tetapi perbedzaan yang bererti (P < 0.05) didapati diantara kedua-duanya dengan D. cucurbitae. Methyl eugenol juga didapati mempunyai daya penarik yang kuat terhadap lalat buah dewasa Dacus dorsalis yang dara berumur lebih daripada 20 hari. SUMMARY Dacus dorsalis Hendel is the predominant species offruit-fly (99.8%) found in a carambola orchard. Population level was found to be correlated (r = 0.56) with rainfall. nfestation offruits began 29 days after fruit set. Laboratory studies show that among the three species offruitflies tested for attractiveness to methyl eugenol, male of D. dorsalis and D. umbrosus showed no significant difference but both are significantly different (p < 0.05) with D. cucurbitae. Virgin adult males of D. dorsalis more than 20 days old were greatly attracted to methyl eugenol. NTRODUCTON The tephritids are destructives pests of both tropical and subtropical fruits. There are approximately 4000 known species within the family Tephritidae (Christenson and Foote, 1960). The most serious pests of agricultural crops are Dacus dorsalis Hendel which are injurious to fleshy fruits like carambola ( Averrhoa carambola), guava (Psidium guava), mango ( Mango indica) and papaya (Carica papaya). Hardy (1973) reported that D. dorsalis are widely distributed in the tropics. Several workers have described in detail the biology of D. dorsalis. (Shah et ai, 1948; Janjuna, 1948). n Peninsular Malaya, Corbett (1928) first recognised the importance of D. dorsalis as a major insect pest of orchards. Biological studies of this particular pest conducted in Malaysia were those by Miller (1940), brahim and Kudom (1978) and brahim and Mohamad (1978). Key to authors' names: brahim, A.G. and Hashim, A.G. 108 n the field, the abundance of D. dorsalis is due to many factors such as climate and hostplants. For example, temperatures influence the reproductive rate of the adult fruit-fly (Lee, 1976). n Malaysia the temperature and relative humidity are relatively constant throughout the year. Rainfall has its seasonal pattern but the effect of rain on the pest population is little known. Various methods have been adopted in controlling fruit-flies, among which, are the use of specific chemical attractants. Methyl eugenol, an attractant, is being used extensively for controlling D. dorsalis. ts usefulness was realised when Howlett (1915) recognized methyl eugenol as one of the main constituents of citronella oil which then attracted D. diversus and D. zonatus. To-day, methyl eugenol has been extracted from diverse plants. (Kawano et al, 1968; Fletcher et al, 1975 and Shah and Patel, 1976). The use of methyl eugenol for annihilation of D. dorsalis was successfully adopted by Steiner (1952). Ever since then, various formulations of methyl eugenol and insecticides have been tried under different climatic conditions.

A. G. BRAHM AND A. G. HASHM (Cunningham et ai, 1978). The use of methyl eugenol has an advantage in that insect pests could be eradicated from an area with the minimum amount of insecticides (Steiner et ai, 1965). n Malaysia, the attractant has been used on a limited scale. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of methyl eugenol in attracting fruit-flies, especially D. dorsalis. This behavioral study in relation to the development of the carambola fruits and rainfall pattern would be useful in the integrated control of Dacus species. MATERALS AND METHODS Field and laboratory studies were conducted to assess the efficacy of methyl eugenol on fruit flies. A trial was conducted in a carambola orchard ca. 1.5 ha at Serdang Baru, Selangor. The experimental site was ca. 1500 m 2 situated almost in the centre of the orchard. The trees of ten years old were in the fruit bearing stage. Laboratory trials were conducted in room at ambient temperature (28 ± 2 C). Trial 1 : Field trapping of Dacus spp. This study was initiated on 16th May 1978 for a period of nine months. Plastic traps (10cm X locm) with circular openings measuring 2.4 em in diameter at both ends were used for trapping the fruit-flies. This round hole trap design was adopted for they were effective in trapping fruit-flies. (brahim et ai, 1979). A total of nine traps were placed at strategic positions in the orchard (Fig. 1). Each f 13' 13' 1 1 Fig. 1: Placement of traps contalntng baits in the experiment plot of Carambola orchard. X is the plant. trap was baited with a mixture of 0.5 ml methyl eugenol, 0.5 ml of Malathion EC 80 and 2 ml of Sucrose solution soaked in cotton rolls. The traps were hung to the branches of trees at a height of ca 1.2 m from the ground. At the chosen height, there was no effect on capture of fruit flies (Hooper and Drew, 1979). Collection of the fruit flies and recharging of the poisoned baits were made every 4th day between 4-5 pm. The flies were sexed and identified. Trial : Laboratory studies Three different species of fruit-flies viz: D. dorsalis, D. cucurbitae Coq and D. umb1'osus Fabr were reared from infested fruit of carambola, cucumber and jack-fruits. The third instars larvae were allowed to pupate in nylon-meshed cages (82 em X 66 cm X 66 cm) filled with sand to a depth of 5 em. The newly emerged adults were provided with water, sugar solution (10%) and protein hydrolysate. Thirty male fruit-flies of the same species which had been kept in captivity with females for ten days were tested for their response to methyl eugenol. A total of 90 male flies belonging to three different species were released in a perspex cage (1m X 1m X 1m). A small trap (8 em X 12 cm) of similar shape to the field trap was used in each cage. The trap was baited with three drops of methyl eugenol, one drop of Malathion and 1 ml of sucrose solution. Recordings were made at hourly intervals for four consecutive hours on all the tested species of the fruit flies. n a further trial to evaluate the stage of adult D. dorsalis attracted to methyl eugenol, the fruit-flies were reared using artificial diet (Tanaka et ai, 1969). Twenty virgin male flies of varying ages of 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 days were placed in separate cages containing methyl eugenol solution, malathion and sucrose solution. The number of flies caught in the traps were recorded at hourly intervals for four hours. Both laboratory trials were replicated four times using the Completely Randomized Design. The results were analysed and the means were separated by the Duncan Multiple Range Tests. RESULTS AND DSCUSSON During the period of nine months (May 1978 to January 1979) the total number of fruitflies caught was 36,035. The dominant fruit flies were the males of Dacus dorsalis. (Table 1). Though D. pede,tris (Bezzi) are known to attack carambola fruits the dissection of the female genitalia failed to show their presence in the traps. The number of female flies caught was 109

METHYL-EUGENOL AS MALE ATTRACTANT FOR DACUS DORSALS extremely low. This finding was similar to that of Steiner et al., (1965) who showed that methyl eugenol rarely attract females. Besides D. dorsalis, the other two species caught were D. umbrosus and D. cucurbitae, though the last two species were significantly (P <0.05) few in number. TABLE 1 Fruit flies, Dacus spp attracted to methyl eugenol in Carambola orchards from 16.4.1978-19.1.1979 Species Sex Total Nos Av. catch/ trap/month D. dorsalis Male 35,959 500.47 Female 76 D. umbroslls Male 26 0.38 Female 2 D. cucllrbitae Male 5 0.13 Female 5 Analysis showed that there was no significant difference in response to methyl eugenol in the laboratory between ten-day-old males of D. dorsalis and D. umbrosus,o but, when compared to D. cucurbitae, their attraction to methyl eugenol was found to be significantly different (Table 2). The percentage of D. dorsalis, D. umbrosus and D. cucurbitae caught were 43.3%, 47.5% and 4.2% respectively. The higher catch of D. dorsalis in the field could be due to their abundance in the open for the laboratory study showed D. dorsalis and D. u1l1brosus were equally attracted to methyl eugenol. The smaller number of D. umbrosus caught could possibly be due to the plant specificity since this species is not known to attack carambola but is specific to Artocarpus spp. Less than 50% of the total number of flies from each species were attracted to methyl eugenol even after four hours. Dissection of the male flies showed them to have well developed testes which suggests that a considerable number of flies are indifferent to methyl eugenol. This suggestion conforms with that of Umeya et al., (1973). The fruit-flies showed marked seasonal fluctuations with the peak periods in September and early December following fruit-set (Fig. 2). Bateman (1973) reported an increase of fruit fly population at the onset of fruit ripening. After all the fruits had been bagged, there was a decline in the population. This could possibly be due to absence of fruits for OViposition which subsequently resulted in a reduced fly population in the field. Observation of fruits in the field showed that the fly oviposited as early as 29 days after fruit set. The flies prefer to oviposit on ripe fruits but in their absence they oviposit on green fruits. Lee (1976) found similar results with young papaya fruits. The relationship between total catch and rainfall was found to positively correlated (r = 0.56). The population was observed to be significantly high (P < 0.05) only after continuous daily rainfall. Lee (1976) observed a similar pattern when a sunny day precedes several cold and wet days. The placing of the traps also influences the amount of fruit-flies caught. Traps placed at the periphery of the orchard had higher counts than those placed in the centre. This suggests that peripheral traps had better access to wind movement and methyl eugenol is capable of attracting flies at a distance of 0.6 km. (Steiner, 1952). The attraction of D. dorsalis to methyl eugenol is relative to the age of the flies (Table 3). The attraction was greatest when the flies were 20 days old. Since methyl eugenol is a sex attractant, it will attract flies of a specific physiological age. Umeya et al., (1973) observed that male fruit flies were not attracted to methyl eugenol until the ninth day, suggesting that TABLE 2 Laboratory study showing cumulative number of fruit flies attracted to methyl eugenol Dacus species Tot. no of flies caught within: 1 hr. 2 hr. 3 hr. 4 hr. ".." D. dorsalis 29 38 46 52 43.3 a D. umbrosus 38 45 49 57 47.5 ab D. cucurbitae 3 4 4.2 c Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level as determined by Duncan's Multiple Range Test. 110

A. G. BRAHM AND A. G. HASHM JOll- 100 90 80 MAY Fig. 2: 55 6p 65 DEC JAN YEAR;1978 YEAR;1979 Fluctuations of fruitfly population in relation to tree phenology and rainfall. TABLE 3 Laboratory study showing cumulative numbers of virgin D. dol'salis attracted to methyl eugenol Age (days) n Tot. No. of flies caught within: hr. 2 hr. 3 hr. 4 hr. 4 80 4 5 5 5 6% a 8 80 4 8 0 0 10% ab 12 80 14 21 25 25 31% c 16 80 38 44 47 47 58% d 20 80 67 71 72 72 90% e Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level as determined by Duncan's Multiple Range Test. sexual maturity may playa prominent role. The knowledge of physiological ages of flies which are responsive to the attractant is important in a control programme where sex attractants are used. CONCLUSON Dacus dorsalis is the main pest of carambola fruits. The fruit-fly population positively correlated (r = 0.56) with the total amount of rainfall. The limited number of female flies in the field traps using methyl eugenol failed to indicate the presence of D. pedestris. The laboratory studies showed varying responses of fruit-flies to methyl eugenol. Male of D. dorsalis and D. umbrosus were equally attracted to the sex attractant but D. cucurbitae was less attracted to the chemical. Evidently, with virgin males of D. dorsalis the response to the attractant increased with the age of the flies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to Messrs Abd. Rahman Mohamad and M. Subramanian for their assistance in the field. 111

METHYL-EUGENOL AS MALE ATTRACTANT FOR DACUS DORSALS REFERENCES CORBETT G.H. (1928): Division of Entomolugy ann~al report. Malay. Agric. J. 17: 276. BATEMAN, M.A. (1973): "Fruit Flies" in Studies of biological control. Delucchi. V.L. (Ed.). p 11-49. London. Cambridge University Press. CUNNNGHAM, R.T., NAKAGAWA, S., SUDA, D.Y. and URAGO, T. (1978): Tephritids fruit fly Trapping. Liquid food baits in high and low rainfall climates. J. Econ. Entornol. 71: 762-763. CHRSTENSON, L.D. and FOOTE, F.H. (1960): Biology of fruit flies. Ann. Rev. Entornol. 5: 171-192. FLETCHER, B.S., BATEMAN, M.A., HART, N.K. and J.A. LAMBERTON (1975): dentification of a fruit fly attractant in an Australian plant. Ziera srnithii on methyl-eugenol. J. Econ. Entornol. 68(6): 815-6. HARDY, D.E. (1973): The fruit flies (Dipt): Tephritidae, on Thailand and bordering countries. Pacific nsects. Monograph 31: 1-2pp. HOOPER, G.H.S. and DREW, R.A.. (1979): Effect of height of Trap on capture of Tephritid Fruit flies with cuelure and methyl eugenol in different environments. Environmental Entornol. 8(5): 786 788. HOWLETT, F.M. (1915): Chemical reaction of fruit flies. Bull. Entornol. Res. 6: 297-305. BRAHM, A.G. and K. GUDOM, F, K. (1978): Biology of Oriental fruit fly Dacus dorsalis Hendel with emphasis on larval development. Pertanika 1(1): 55-58. BRAHM, A.G., SNGH, G., KNG, H.S.K. (1979): Trapping of fruit-flies, Dacus spp (Dipt: Tephritidae) with methyl eugenol in Orchards. Pertanika 2(1), 58-61. BRAHM, Y. and MOHAMAD, R. (1978): Pupal distribution of D. dorsalis Hendel in relation to host plant and its pupation depth. Pertanika 1(2), 66-69. JANJUNA, N.A. (1948): The biology of Daclls fe,-yllgineus (Tephritidae: Diptera) in Baluchistan. ndian J. Ellt. 10(1): 55-61. KAWA 0, Y., MTCHELL, W.C. and MATSUMOTO, H. (1968): dentification of the male Oriental fruitfly attractant in the Golden Shower blossom. J. Econ. Elltornol. 61(4): 986-8. LEE, H.S. (1976): nvestigation on the oriental fruitfly D. dorsalis Hendel domaging papaya. J. Ag ic. Res. of China. 25(2): 156-162. MLLER, N.C.E. (1940): Fruit-flies. Malay. Agric. J. 38(3): 112-21. SHAH, A.H., PATEL, R.C. (1976): Role of tulsi plant, Ocirnun sanctum in control of mango fruit fly, D. correctlis Bezzi. em'rent Sci. 45(8): 353-4. SHAH, M.l., BATRA, H.N., RANJHEN, P.C. (1948): Notes on biology of Dacus ferruginells Fabr. and other fruit-flies in north-west frontier province. nd. J. Ento. 10: 249-66. STENER, L.F. (1952): Methyl eugenol as an attractant for oriental fruit-fly. J. Econ. Entornol. 45(2): 241-48. STENER, L.F., MTCHELL, W.C., HARRS, E.J., KOZUMA, T.T., FUJMOTO, M.S. (1965): Oriental fruit fly eradication by male annihilation. J. Econ. Entornol. 58(5): 961-4. TANAKA, " STENER, L.F., OHNATA, K., OKAMOTO, R. (1969): Low cost larval rearing medium for mass production of Oriental fruit flies. J. Econ. Entomol. 62(4): 967-68. UMEYA, K., SEKGUCH, Y., USHO, S.Z. (1973): The reproductive ability of D. dorsalis Hendel and the response of adults to methyl eugenol. Japanese J. of App. Entomol and Zoology. 17(2): 63-70. (Received 19 June 1980) 112