Level of Service Inventory-Revised

Similar documents
Prison Population Reduction Strategies Through the Use of Offender Assessment: A Path Toward Enhanced Public Safety

What works and What Doesn t in Reducing Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned from Evaluating Correctional Programs

VISITING EXPERTS PAPERS

Assessing Risk for Persons with Behavioral Health Needs Involved in the Criminal Justice System

Two, contrasting, models of offender rehabilitation evident, each with distinct normative and etiological assumptions:

Project RISCO Research Summary

AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT WORKS IN CORRECTIONAL INTERVENTIONS

EPICS. Effective Practices in Community Supervision. Brought to you by the Multco. EPICS Training team

RISK-NEED-RESPONSIVITY & HOW IT APPLIES TO DRUG COURTS

Effective Approaches for Screening and Assessment of Co-Occurring Disorders among Offenders

Implementing a Risk/Need/Responsivity Framework into an Offender Management System. April 5, 2017

Juvenile Justice Vision 20/20 Fall Conference November 13, 2014 Grand Valley State University

Implications of contemporary research findings on future policy & practice

Getting To Desired Outcomes:

A Foundation for Evidence-Based Justice Decisions

What Works and What Doesn t in Reducing Recidivism: How to Design More Effective Correctional Programs and What Gets in the Way

JUSTICE REINVESTMENT: FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY-CENTERED OFFENDER REHABILITATION. Hon. Frank L. Racek

TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION, HISTORIC OVERVIEW, NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON OFFENDER NEEDS AND RISK ASSESSMENT

Carey A. Welebob Division Director TDCJ-CJAD

Jennifer Eno Louden, PhD Department of Psychology University of Texas at El Paso

Exploring the validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised with Native American offenders

What Works and What Doesn t in Reducing Recidivism: The Principles of Effective Intervention

What Works and What Doesn t in Reducing Recidivism with Youthful Offenders

Responsivity in the Risk /Need Framework February 10, 2011

Objectives. Applying Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Principles to the Treatment and Management of Sexual Offenders 6/7/2017. Ernie Marshall, LCSW

Risk and Criminogenic Needs Assessment System

What works and What Doesn t in Reducing Recidivism and What Gets in the Way: Some Lessons Learned from Evaluating Correctional Programs

Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Chief of Science, Law & Policy. National Association of Drug Court Professionals

Allen County Community Corrections. Home Detention-Day Reporting Program. Report for Calendar Years

The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model of Assessing Justice Involved Clients. Roberta C. Churchill M.A., LMHC ACJS, Inc.

Phoenix/New Freedom Programs

MORE TREATMENT, BETTER TREATMENT AND THE RIGHT TREATMENT

Risk assessment principle and Risk management

SIGNATURE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OR CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Corrections, Public Safety and Policing

2016 Annual Meeting Conference

Fourth Generation Risk Assessment and Prisoner Reentry. Brian D. Martin. Brian R. Kowalski. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Assessing Responsivity PRESENTED BY: MARK MCDONALD, MS, CRADC

Residential Positive Achievement Change Tool (R-PACT) Validation Study

CHAPTER 1 An Evidence-Based Approach to Corrections

Thirteen (13) Questions Judges Should Ask Their Probation Chiefs

PROGRAM AUDIT MANUAL

CRIMINAL THINKING AND ANTISOCIAL LOGIC

Assessing ACE: The Probation Board s Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Reduce Reoffending

5/30/2018. Assessment and Treatment Planning for Substance Use Disorder. Learning Objectives. Introductions

Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs

Office of Research and Strategic Planning

Meeting Minutes CJCC Subcommittee Empowering Reentry & Reducing Recidivism Jury Room B, Law & Justice Center February 3, 2010

Pathways to Crime. Female Offender Experiences of Victimization. JRSA/BJS National Conference, Portland Maine, 10/28/10

Best Practices for Effective Correctional Programs

Addressing a National Crisis: Too Many Individuals with Mental Illnesses in our Jails

Running head: EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO REDUCE RECIDIVISM 1. An Evaluation of Programs Designed to Reduce Recidivism.

Risk Management Strategies: Developing a Case Plan

Interventions for High Risk Sexual Offenders

Validation of the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI) for Community Based Offenders in Colorado: Phase II

Criminal Justice Reform: Treatment and Substance Use Disorder

Over the last several years, the importance of the risk principle has been

E-Career Counseling for Offender Re-entry

Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. NADCP July 28, 2015

Assessing and Treating Sexual Offenders. Anna C. Salter, Ph.D.

Carey guides KARI BERG

2016 MATCP Conference. Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management, and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. Mark Stodola Probation Fellow

Vera Institute of Justice, Center on Sentencing and Corrections

Evidence-Based Screening Instruments for Co-Occurring Disorders in the Justice System

An Overview of Risk-Needs- Responsivity Model: Application to Behavioral Health Populations

Addressing Co-Occurring Disorders in Court-Based Programs

Maximizing the Impact of Interventions for Youth: The Importance of Risk/Needs Assessment

Guidelines for the Successful Transition of People with Behavioral Health Disorders from Jail and Prison

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center April Prepared by: Kristine Denman, Director, NMSAC

Evidence-Based Sentencing to Reduce Recidivism

Community Partners Reinvestment Program (CPR) Volunteers of America Oregon. Final Full Sample Evaluation Report July 1, June 30, 2010

HEALTHIER LIVES, STRONGER FAMILIES, SAFER COMMUNITIES:

ACE! The Risk-Need- Responsivity Simulation Tool. The Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence. Solutions For Justice Professionals.

Pioneering, addiction medicine, wrap-around service

Behavioral Health Diversion Strategies

CCAPPOAP Conference. Accountability and Recovery for DUI Offenders

Unit 2: The Risk and Needs Principles

2017 NADCP Conference. Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management, and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. Mark Stodola Probation Fellow

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

The RNR Simulation Tool: Putting RNR to Work to Improve Client Outcomes

MCJRP 2016 Evolving Evidence Based Practice. LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL May 3, 2016

4/12/2011. Webinar Housekeeping BJA NTTAC. Incorporating the Principles of Risk, Need, & Responsivity into Reentry Program Designs April 12, 2011

Static-99R Training. Washington State Department of Corrections. Jacob Bezanson and Jeff Landon.

What is Evidence Based Practice? Providing Effective Substance Abuse Treatment to a Correctional Population 10/26/2018

PROMISING SHORT TERM INTERVENTIONS:

probation, number of parole revocations, DVI Alcohol Scale scores, DVI Control Scale scores, and DVI Stress Coping Abilities Scale scores.

Women in Treatment Courts

The Offender Assessment System (OASys): Development, validation and use in practice

Drug Court Victoria. Katharine Biffin Program Manager Drug Court Melbourne May 2018

Use of Structured Risk/Need Assessments to Improve Outcomes for Juvenile Offenders

issue. Some Americans and criminal justice officials want to protect inmates access to

A Risk Assessment and Risk Management Approach to Sexual Offending for the Probation Service

An Overview of Procedures and Roles: A Case Study on the Drug Courts of Jamaica

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IMPLEMENTATION QUALITY AND RECIDIVISM. A Thesis Submitted to the College of. Graduate Studies and Research

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT. An Overview

What to Measure in Client Behavior

Activities Guide. Module 2. Your Community, Your Mental Health Court. Developing a Mental Health Court: An Interdisciplinary Curriculum

The 5 Obstacles to Alcohol Monitoring:

BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES Treatment Groups

Evidence-Based Correctional Program Checklist (CPC 2.0) Acknowledgments. Purpose of the CPC 2/22/16

Transcription:

Level of Service Inventory-Revised COUNCIL OF ACCOUNTABILITY COURT JUDGES LASHEIKA KASSA, TREATMENT SUPPORT FIDELITY SPECIALIST

LSI-R Overview 1. Description of LSI-R 2. Criminogenic Needs (R-N-R) 3. LSI-R Administration & Scoring 4. Q&A, Uses, General Information

Level of Service Inventory Revised Ages 16 and up Predicts parole outcome, success in correctional halfway houses, institutional misconduct and recidivism Consist of 54 questions Focuses on offender attributes and situations relevant to their level of supervision and treatment decisions 10 Key Areas Measured Reliable and Valid Tool

Criminogenic Needs Characteristics, traits, problems, or issues of an individual that directly relate to the individuals likelihood to reoffend or commit another crime.

Risk-Need-Responsivity Risk- WHO do we target for services Need-What factors do we need to address Responsivity-How to deliver services to our clients

Risk Principle Supervision and treatment levels should match the offenders level of risk (low-risk vs. high-risk) Intensive Rehabilitation services are more effective in reducing recidivism when matched with high-risk offenders than with low-risk offenders Services should be provided to those assessed as having a higher probability of recidivism.

Risk Factors STATIC Age at time of arrest Criminal History Single-parent home (childhood) Parents on drugs Abused as a child Family Criminality DYNAMIC Substance Use Criminal Associates Employment Status Beliefs/Attitudes Residency Lack of respect for authority

Need Principle Indicates that programs focus on addressing the criminogenic needs of the offender in order to effectively prevent future crime once the offender leaves treatment/facility. This principle address the specific needs an offender has that makes him more likely to commit crime. (Literacy, job skills training, substance abuse treatment, time management, etc.) These are based on dynamic risk factors.

Responsivity Principle Match offenders to a level of programming based on their risk level and criminogenic needs. Treatment Dosage-how much treatment should each client receive based on risk level score. (ASAM Levels of Care, LSI-R Score, TCUDS, etc.)

Key Factors A person with a heightened risk profile can have his chance of recidivism reduced via appropriately targeted services meeting his/her specific criminogenic need. Targeting needs like low self-esteem or personal distress is unlikely to lead to any reductions in recidivism (Ward, Melser & Yates, 2007) as these factors are not directly related to crime. (Bonta, Law, and Hanson, 1999) Knowledge of what constitutes risk and how it can be measured is important as it will help community partners decide who needs help and the level of help they need. (Andrews and Dowden, 2006).

Andrews and Bonta Central Eight (2006) Offenders who score higher on elements of the central eight are more likely to recidivate and hence are more likely to benefit from a higher intensity of service. 1. Antisocial/pro-criminal attitudes, values, beliefs & cognitive emotional states. 2. Pro-criminal associates & isolation from anti-criminal others. 3. Temperamental and anti-social personality patterns conducive to criminal activity including: Weak socialization Impulsivity Adventurous Restless/Aggressive Egocentrism A taste for risk Weak problem solving/self-regulation & coping skills

4. A history of antisocial behavior Andrews and Bonta Central Eight (2006) The central eight lists the eight factors most predictive of criminal recidivism. 5. Familial factors that include criminality and a variety of psychological problems in the family of origin including low levels of affection, caring and cohesiveness. 6. Low levels of personal, educational, vocational, or financial achievement. 7. Low levels of involvement in pro-social leisure activities 8. Substance Abuse

Level of Service Inventory-Revised Paper/Pencil or Computer Based Assessment should be done in person (Jail or Office) Beneficial to familiarize self with clients criminal background and history prior to assessment Highly suggest same individuals perform assessment Use professional judgement to determine if client is under the influence or mentally unstable to give accurate assessment. (May need to reschedule for another time) Build rapport with client (why you are there, give overview of accountability court program, ensure they understand, etc.)

LSI-R Subcomponents 1. Criminal History (10) 2. Education/Employment (10) 3. Financial (2) 4. Family/Marital (4) 5. Accommodation (3) 6. Leisure/Recreation (2) 7. Companions (5) 8. Alcohol/Drug Problem (9) 9. Emotional/Personal (5) 10. Attitudes/Orientation (4)

LSI-R Administration and Scoring

Things To Consider Highly recommended LSI-R to be completed prior to client entering accountability court program. Court should consider if they can meet all the needs of the client based on their risk level. LSI-R should not be the only tool of measure to determine if a client is a good fit. Treatment providers, coordinator, or case manager should utilize other assessments such as Mental Health Screen, TCUDS, etc. (LSI-R has an override feature for clinicians to use if necessary) Final score and results from LSI-R should be sent to coordinator and saved on accountability court computer. Client challenges should be discussed in staffing prior to client entering program.

Treatment Planning Medium, High and Very High Risk Factors should be addressed on clients treatment plan. Treatment plans should be updated and continuously addressed with counselor/case manager. Utilize competency checklists to help aid clients in phase movement. (Use treatment plan to help client understand expectations) Sanctions/Incentives can be utilized to ensure progress on main elements of the case management/treatment plan.

Pre/Post Accountability Court

LSI-R Scoring/Risk Levels Low (0-13) Low-Moderate Risk (14-23) Moderate-High Risk (24-33) High-Risk (34-54)

LSI-R Uses Ordering More 25 Downloads Should be done electronically Use the Interviewing Guide to assist CACJ Website

Questions?

Contact Info Lasheika.Kassa@georgiacourts.gov Office: 404-463-0043 www.gaaccountabilitycourts.org