ClinicalTrials.gov a programmer s perspective

Similar documents
ClinicalTrials.gov Registration User s Guide. January 2018

Mini Summit XIV: Clinical Trial Disclosure and Results Reporting Liability under FDAAA, Section 801

AGREEMENT ON COMMON PRINCIPLES AND RULES OF CIRCULATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS WITHIN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION. (Moscow, 23 December 2014)

Standards for Analyzable Submission Datasets for Directed Safety Analyses

The Role and Importance of Clinical Trial Registries and Results Databases

Thursday, April 23. Incorporating ClinicalTrials.gov Into Patient Education and Care Coordination. Session 1:30 3 pm Valencia BC

FDLI s Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Conference. Center for Tobacco Products Office of Compliance and Enforcement 2017 Update

Data Collection Methods to Improve Quality Control. CNDR Innovation At Work

UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) and British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences (BASES) Partnership Agreement Liam Jefferson January 2018

Yale University. Open Data Access Project

Risk Evaluation And Mitigation Strategies:

FDA 510(k) 101 The Basics

IRB for Humanists. Naomi E. Coll, MPH, CPH, CIP Manager of Research Integrity

Scheduling a Course as a Professional Development Event

Alberta - US Comparator: Standard-Making and Enforcement Functions

The NIH Biosketch. February 2016

Boehringer Ingelheim Biopharmaceuticals in China. Your Reliable Contract Manufacturing Solution Provider

Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registry (ASAR) Policy & Procedures 6 - Reporting Accreditation Decisions

TITLE: Obtaining Informed Consent of Non-English Speakers SOP #: CON-101 (formerly SM-507) Page: 1 of 7 Effective Date: 1/14/2016

TRAUMA RECOVERY/HAP OPERATING GUIDELINES

Award for a Physical Therapist

Associate of Applied Science Degree Physical Therapist Assistant Application Fall 2018

INTRODUCTION TO THE MEDICINES PATENT POOL

Biennial Review of the Trinity Valley Community College s Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

The proposed rule is significant, and the requirements and exceptions are complex. Key provisions of the proposal are described below.

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Request for Proposals (RFP) for School-Based Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Services

Complete Central Registry Treatment Information Requires Ongoing Reporting and Consolidation Well Beyond 6-Month Reporting

Regulatory Framework for Medical Devices in South Africa. 23 November 2018 Andrea Keyter Deputy Director: Medical Devices

AVEO and Astellas Report Final Overall Survival Results from TIVO-1

PQRS 2014 Submission through the Surgeon Specific Registry

Use of Standards in Substantial Equivalence Determinations

Content Part 2 Users manual... 4

510(k) submissions. Getting US FDA clearance for your device: Improving

NEW BIOSKETCH FORMAT? NO PROBLEM!

Application to import or export donor sperm, eggs or embryos

LOGIC MODEL TEMPLATE ACT EARLY SUMMIT -WA

Commission on Cancer Updates

Tamsulosin Hydrochloride 0.4 mg Capsule

Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registry (ASAR) Policy & Procedure 9 - Annual Reporting Requirements for Accredited Sonography Courses

Mitch Zeller, Director, Center for Tobacco Products, FDA September 19, 2013 Kansas Public Health Association

Please pay attention to Question 15 in the questionnaire regarding contact information related to the payment process.

NIH NEW CLINICAL TRIAL REQUIREMENTS AND FORMS-E

Summary of Changes to Human Subjects Regulations: Effective January 21, 2019

is to improve the future

NONE. Disclosures. Accreditation Update

Standard operating procedure

BIENNIAL REVIEW Compliance with the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act. St. Johns River State College

Consob Net Short Positions ( NSP ) Notification System. User Manual

Overview of the Legal Framework for Medical Device Regulation in the United States

Minnesota. Prescribing and Dispensing Profile. Research current through November 2015.

DRUG PRODUCT INTERCHANGEABILITY AND PRICING ACT

Human Subjects Research: Overview. Colleen Kohashi and Tani Prestage Office for the Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS) February 26, 2016

Office of Research Compliance. Research Involving Human Subjects

Blue Distinction Centers for Fertility Care 2018 Provider Survey

UND GERIATRIC MEDICINE FELLOWSHIP CURRICULUM RESEARCH

Chapter Affiliation Requirements Workbook

Supporting patient groups: a pharmaceutical company perspective Susanna Leto di Priolo Novartis Oncology Region Europe

American Joint Replacement Registry s Orthopaedic Quality Resource Center a CMS approved Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR)

Diabetes Physician Recognition Program (DPRP) Frequently Asked Questions*

LEGAL ASPECTS of MEDICAL MARIJUANA Florida Nurse Practitioner Network Annual Conference September 17, 2018

What makes Oncology special? Johanna MURSIC, Indication Programmer PhUSE congress Budapest, October 15 th 2012

2018 INFUSE CALL FOR INNOVATION

Guidance for Industry

Report on. The feasibility of including blood lead level assessment information in the school records of enrolled children

FDA s Action Agenda to Reduce Tobacco Related-Cancer Incidence and Mortality

Title 1 Descriptive title identifying the study design, population, interventions, and, if applicable, trial acronym

INFORMATION FOR RESEARCHERS REQUESTING DATA FROM THE NHVPR

EHR/CR Functional Profile & HIMSS 2008 Update

PROGRAM OVERVIEW. Copyright 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Report No May 2016

2017 CURE - Sleep and Epilepsy Award Request for Applications (RFA) with LOI & Full Proposal Guidelines

CDISC - Mapping New Pathways for Novartis. Darren Weston, Project Leader Pat Majcher, Senior Principal Programmer

PROPOSED WORK PROGRAMME FOR THE CLEARING-HOUSE MECHANISM IN SUPPORT OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR BIODIVERSITY Note by the Executive Secretary

PGD CHECKLIST FOR DIRECTORATE CLINICAL GOVERNANCE COMMITTEES

Preparing a US FDA Medical Device 510(K) Submission

LEAF Marque Assurance Programme

Domestic Violence Strategy for Legal Aid Ontario Summary

Transparenzvorgaben in der Klinischen Prüfung

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Attention: Scott D. Tomsky Vice President, US Generics Regulatory Affairs 425 Privet Road Horsham, PA 19044

IACAPAP 2018 Abstracts Submission Guidelines

Judicial & Ethics Policy

Preparing for an Oral Hearing: Taxi, Limousine or other PDV Applications

TRUSTLINE REGISTRY The California Registry of In-Home Child Care Providers Subsidized Application

Regulation of the Promotion of Prescription Drugs

Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; Regulatory Science Initiatives; Public Hearing;

EXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists

Program Objectives Hospice Compare

BAYOU OAKS TOWNHOUSE EVENT POLICY. Effective: September 22, 2016

TOOL 10. MODEL CODE OF CONDUCT FOR NCM MEMBERS

When/How to Update a ClinicalTrials.gov Record

Athlete Registration Licensing. June 2018

POSITION DESCRIPTION Oregon Area Al-Anon Family Groups. TERM LENGTH: Three Years (Beginning January 1, after election)

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2760

Nevertheless, NSP grantees may retain some or all program income in the NSP program;

Wednesday October 4, 2017

Improving the lives of people with neurological conditions. Annual General Meeting Neurotech International Limited (ASX: NTI) November 2017

Instructions for Applicants. Successful completion of this examination is required as one of the conditions for licensure in the State of Vermont.

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

Transcription:

PhUSE 2009, Basel ClinicalTrials.gov a programmer s perspective Ralf Minkenberg Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG PhUSE 2009, Basel 1

Agenda ClinicalTrials.gov Basic Results disclosure Initial process Future process Summary PhUSE 2009, Basel 2

ClinicalTrials.gov History Launched in Feb 2000 Key summary protocol information FDA Amendment Act (FDAAA) 801 in 2007 Registry expanded Results database added Results section enabled on 27 Sep 2007 Trial registration required by public law from Dec 2007 Results reporting required from Sep 2008 Adverse event disclosure from Sep 2009 Expansion foreseen in Sep 2010 PhUSE 2009, Basel 3

ClinicalTrials.gov Statistics I (Trials as of 09/28/2009) Number Percent Total registered 79,347 100% Type of trial Observational 12,921 16% Interventional 66,105 83% International sites (171 countries) USA 42,849 54% Europe 18,841 24% Data provider US Federal (incl. NIH) 18.824 24% Industry 32,140 41% University, Other 40,822 51% PhUSE 2009, Basel 4

ClinicalTrials.gov Statistics II (Trials as of 09/28/2009) Number Percent Total with results 824 100% Type of trial Observational 41 5% Interventional 783 95% International sites USA 393 48% Europe 168 20% Data provider US Federal (incl. NIH) 29 4% Industry 710 86% University, Other 110 13% PhUSE 2009, Basel 5

Results Disclosure on ClinicalTrials.gov Registration and results reporting via Web-based Protocol Registration System (PRS) Basic results required for applicable clinical trials, i.e. Phase 2 to 4 interventional studies* Studies involving drugs, biological products or medical devices approved and regulated by FDA Studies with sites in US or studies conducted under NDA Studies initiated or ongoing as of SEP 27, 2007 or later * Self-commitment by PhRMA: Phase 1 to 4 studies involving patients PhUSE 2009, Basel 6

Timelines for ClinicalTrials.gov Generally, submission of results within 12 months of the earlier of the estimated or actual trial completion date Delayed submission of results Seeking initial approval Seeking approval for a new use Extensions for good cause PhUSE 2009, Basel 7

Prohibited Acts and Penalties Prohibited Acts Failure to submit a certification Knowingly submitting a false certification Failure to submit required clinical trial information Submission of false or misleading clinical trial information Penalties Penalty for a violation is up to $10,000 If the violation is not fixed after 30 days, the penalty can be up to $10,000 per day until the violation is fixed PhUSE 2009, Basel 8

Agenda ClinicalTrials.gov Basic Results disclosure Initial process Future process Summary PhUSE 2009, Basel 9

Basic Results Information Scientific information Participants flow (Disposition) by treatment arm Baseline characteristics overall and by treatment arm Primary and secondary outcome measures, statistical analyses by treatment arm Adverse events by treatment arm Administrative information Point of contact (for scientific information) Certain agreements (restrictions on PI to discuss or publish results after trial completion date) PhUSE 2009, Basel 10

Adverse Events Serious Adverse Events Table of anticipated and unanticipated serious adverse events Grouped by organ system class Number and frequency of events in each clinical trial arm Frequent (other) Adverse Events Table of anticipated and unanticipated non-serious adverse events Exceed a frequency of 5 percent within any trial arm Number and frequency of events in each clinical trial arm PhUSE 2009, Basel 11

The Website ClinicalTrials.gov PhUSE 2009, Basel 12

Results Participant flow PhUSE 2009, Basel 13

Results Baseline Measures PhUSE 2009, Basel 14

Results Outcome Measures I PhUSE 2009, Basel 15

Results Outcome Measures II PhUSE 2009, Basel 16

Results Serious Adverse Events PhUSE 2009, Basel 17

Agenda ClinicalTrials.gov Basic Results disclosure Initial process Future process Summary PhUSE 2009, Basel 18

Current Process Description Identify trials for which results have to be published on ClinicalTrials.gov Contacting trial team, sending out excel template Filling excel template before deadline Formal QC approval Data entry to ClinicalTrials.gov web form Final review and approval Uploading/entering to ClinicalTrials.gov PhUSE 2009, Basel 19

Problems and Issues Mainly manually driven process Entering and copying of information vulnerable to errors Validation and Quality Check are time-consuming Trial teams are often not familiar with ClinicalTrials.gov PhUSE 2009, Basel 20

Agenda ClinicalTrials.gov Basic Results disclosure Initial process Future process Summary PhUSE 2009, Basel 21

Future Process Identification of needed items for result collection during TSAP writing Program/save results into pre-defined datasets automatically Convert datasets into xml format eligible for ClinicalTrials.gov Final review of xml file Uploading to ClinicalTrials.gov PhUSE 2009, Basel 22

The statistician s responsibility During writing of Analysis Plan Specify information which should be disclosed Identify tables of CTR with information for disclosure Define specifications for programming Keep track of changes PhUSE 2009, Basel 23

The programmer s responsibility During table creation for Clinical Trial Report (CTR) Extract information needed for ClinicalTrials.gov Save information in dataset ( Disclosure Data Set ) Use validated macro code Transform final dataset into xml format Validation during standard program validation PhUSE 2009, Basel 24

Advantages Information is collected when it is produced anyway Manual data entry minimized Accuracy of data ensured within current standard processes Disclosure data are available early before official deadline Minor additional workload PhUSE 2009, Basel 25

Agenda ClinicalTrials.gov Basic Results disclosure Initial process Future process Summary PhUSE 2009, Basel 26

Summary Additional workload due to legal requirements to disclose on ClinicalTrials.gov necessary First process Data entry and copy manually Vulnerable to errors Future process Needed information is produced automatically Only minor additional workload Use of validated tools PhUSE 2009, Basel 27

PhUSE 2009, Basel 28