Technical brochure StarLac

Similar documents
OCE TABLETING DIRECT COMPRESSION CO-PROCESSED LACTOSE. Technical brochure MicroceLac 100

Technical brochure CombiLac

Technical brochure InhaLac

Technical brochure RetaLac

VIVAPHARM PVP/VA. Copovidone, Ph.Eur. USP/NF, JPE, E. The Ultimate Tablet Binder for All Processing Technologies

Ingredients adapted to a fit for use model. APIs allowed the fit for use strategy to work. There has been a shift to designed for purpose

LubriTose Mannitol Michael Crowley, Director of R&D, Excipients

Content Uniformity of Direct Compression tablets

The binding performance of DFE Pharma Starch

Wettable Magnesium Stearate. What Are Customers Looking for in Selecting Pharmaceutical Lubricants?

The unlocked synergy of DFE Pharma MCC

STARCH Application Data

Direct Compression. With the right ingredients it s a simple, cost-effective manufacturing process

TECHNICAL INFORMATION RxCIPIENTS FM A versatile excipient for orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) formulations

Designed and manufactured specifically for pharmaceutical capsule filling

REVISION OF MONOGRAPH ON TABLETS. Tablets

Formulation Development and Evaluation of Atorvastatin Calcium Tablets using Co-Processed Excipients

Excipient Considerations for Continuous Manufacturing Implementation

FLORITER. New Technology for Innovative Formulation Design.

Re-compaction properties of lactose and microcrystalline cellulose

STARCH Proven and Trusted Excipient for Performance and Versatility EXCIPIENTS. Effective and economical disintegrant

African Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Development

Decentralised Procedure. Public Assessment Report

Kolliwax HCO. Technical Information. Hydrogenated castor oil powder for pharmaceutical use. = Registered trademark in many countries.

Application of Starches, Modified Starches and Starch Derivatives in Pharmaceutical Products

Lactose Free, Direct Compression Formulation Used to Produce Loratadine (10 mg) Tablets

CONTENTS PAGE. Please note: Preface Matrix system Selection of METOLOSE grades Specifications

372 J App Pharm Vol. 6; Issue 4: ; October, 2014 Moazzem et al, 2014

STABILITY STUDIES OF FORMULATED CONTROLLED RELEASE ACECLOFENAC TABLETS

DEVELOPMENT OF NON SODIUM EFFERVESCENT TABLET OF PARACETAMOL USING ARGININE CARBONATE

SUSTAINED RELEASE TABLETS USING A PVA DC FORMULATION RESISTANT TO ALCOHOL INDUCED DOSE DUMPING

Assessment of Low Dose Content Uniformity of Indomethacin in Excipient Blends Using FT-Raman Mapping Spectroscopy

DVA Symposium Mexico City Anisul Quadir Ph.D, MBA SE Tylose USA, Inc. (A Shin-Etsu Chemical Group Co.) Totowa, NJ

Formulation and evaluation of oro-dispersible tablets of lafutidine

IJRPC 2012, 2(3) Chowdary et al ISSN: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY

Citric Acid, Monohydrate

AMENDMENTS TO THE SECOND REVISION OF THE FIRST EDITION OF THE MANUAL ON DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF FAO AND WHO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PESTICIDES

7. SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

FABRICATION AND EVALUATION OF GLIMEPIRIDE CORDIA DICHOTOMA G.FORST FRUIT MUCILAGE SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS

Co-Processed Excipients: Regulatory Challenges. Carl Mroz Colorcon Limited June 2009

DISCIPLINE RECORD/ COURSE / SEMINAR DESCRIPTION

Research Article Preformulation Studies for Generic Omeprazole Magnesium Enteric Coated Tablets

Excipient Functionality & Pharmacopoeia IPEC Europe Excipients Forum Nice, 5 February 2015

OPTIMIZATION OF CONTROLLED RELEASE GASTRORETENTIVE BUOYANT TABLET WITH XANTHAN GUM AND POLYOX WSR 1105

(51) Int Cl.: A61K 9/20 ( ) A61K 31/41 ( )

Direct Compression Formulation Using Starch 1500 with Ranitidine HCl (150 mg) Tablets, Film Coated with Opadry II (85F Series)

Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci., 2014; 4(1):47-51 ISSN:

Primellose is an excellent choice as superdisintegrant in ODT applications

Dissolution control of direct compression tablets in different test media using novel pregelatinized starch, Swelstar TM MX-1

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF PIROXICAM AND CELECOXIB TABLETS EMPLOYING PROSOLVE BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD

Food supplement manufacture

LAB.2. Tablet Production Methods

Evaluation of different binders for roller compaction R. Wang, W. Liu, T. Durig

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

J.Ayyappan et al, /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.2 (7), 2010,

Formulation and Evaluation

Wherever life takes you BASF excipients for orally disintegrating tablets make medication easy

PHARMACEUTICAL AID PREPARED BY B.KIRUTHIGA LECTURER DEPT OF PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY

Available online Research Article

Effect of Compaction Forces on Powder Bed Permeability of Magnesium Silicate "Common Excipient Mixture"

Public Assessment Report. Scientific discussion. Tadalafil 1A Pharma 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg, film-coated tablets.

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION. Efavirenz

Formulation Facilitation of Powder Blends, Sugar-Free Coatings and HME with an Unique Polyol

Research Paper The Effect of Different Superdisintegrants and their Concentrations on the Dissolution of Topiramate Immediate Release Tablets

Formulation and In-vitro Evaluation of Chewable Tablets of Montelukast Sodium

AAPS Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA November 12, 2017 Short Course. Pharmaceutical Excipients: Biopharmaceutical, QC and Regulatory Considerations

FAO SPECIFICATIONS FAO PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS SULPHUR. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 1973

COMPARATIVE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HIGH FUNCTIONALITY EXCIPIENTS ON VARIOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF VARDENAFIL HCL TABLETS (BCS II DRUG)

Formulation and evaluation of immediate release salbutamol sulphate

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2009/42

Short Communication. Formulation of Furosemide Dispersible Tablets for Use in Paediatrics V. V. ABWOVA, P. N. MBEO, L. J. TIROP AND K. A. M.

525 International Journal of Current Trends in Pharmaceutical Research

CAPMUL + CAPTEX + ACCONON = SEDDS

Lactose, Monohydrate

Tablet is a major category of solid dosage forms which are widely used worldwide. Extensive information is required to prepare tablets with good

Development of USP Delayed Release Aspirin Tablets using Opadry Enteric, Acrylic-Based Coating System

Scholars Research Library

Available online through

Formulation And Evaluation Of Flurbiprofen Matrix Tablets For Colon Targeting

USP Perspective on Atypical Actives November 29, 2017

Pelagia Research Library

DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A DIRECTLY COMPRESSIBLE CO PROCESSED MULTIFUNCTION SUSTAINED RELEASE AGENT FOR TABLETS

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

B. Jayakar et. al. FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ORODISPERSIBLE TABLET OF CELECOXIB R. Margret Chandira, Shyam Sharma, Debjit Bhowmik, B.

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

In-Vitro Bioequivalence Studies for Oral Solid Dose products using the Morphologi G3-ID

Formulation and Evaluation of Gastroretentive Dosage form of Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride.

The Particle Design of Cellulose and the Other Excipients for a Directly Compressible Filler-Binder

REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE. Dr. Raghunandan H V Associate Professor JSSCP, JSSU, Mysore

YOUR ORAL SOLID DOSE. In pursuit of excipient excellence

KING KHALID UNIVERSITY

INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACY

Design and development of fast Melting Tablets of Terbutaline Sulphate

905 UNIFORMITY OF DOSAGE UNITS

Soluplus The Solid Solution Opening New Doors in Solubilization.

EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

Formulation Development, Evaluation and Comparative Study of Effects of Super Disintegrants in Cefixime Oral Disintegrating Tablets

Formulation and Development of Sustained Release Tablets of Valsartan Sodium

Public Assessment Report. Scientific discussion. Pentasa Compact 4 g, prolonged-release granules. (mesalazine) NL License RVG:

Easy, fast and reliable!

Transcription:

T R TABLETING AC DIRECT COMPRESSION CO-PROCESSED LACTOSE Technical brochure

MEGGLE co-processed lactose grades for direct compression: General information Direct compression (DC) tablet manufacture is a popular choice because it provides the least complex, most cost effective process to produce tablets compared to other tablet manufacturing approaches. Manufacturers can blend APIs with excipients and compress, making dosage forms simple to produce [1, 2]. DC technology and the use of modern tableting equipment require that excipients and APIs form a compactable mixture with excellent flowability and low particle segregation tendency [3]. In the pharmaceutical industry, lactose is one of the most commonly used excipients; however, like many other excipients, lactose may not be suitable for direct compression without modification due to insufficient powder flow or/and compaction properties (Figure 1). Product description Alpha-lactose monohydrate and maize starch (corn starch) are functional excipients used in oral solid dosage forms. Both are naturally derived and well established in the pharmaceutical industry. Lactose is frequently used as a diluent or direct compression binder. Starch can be used as a binder for wet or dry applications, disintegrant, and diluent. In an effort to establish synergistic functional performance, such as enhanced compactability and faster tablet disintegration, lactose and starch were co-spray-dried to form a mono particulate system. comprises 85 % alpha-lactose monohydrate and 15 % native maize starch. provides compaction and lubricant insensitivity characteristics desired for direct compression, and the hydration properties desired for rapid API release. Additionally, s flowability is superior compared to a physical blend of the individual components in equivalent ratio. Lactose performance Flowability/compressability High WG DC Powder flow WG DG Low Powder compressability High Figure 1: Powder blend compressability and flowability requirements for various tableting technologies (DC is direct compression, WG is wet granulation, DG is dry granulation) [3]. 2 MEGGLE Co-processed lactose 9-25-214

Regulatory & quality information The raw materials used to produce, alpha-lactose monohydrate and maize starch, comply with Ph.Eur., USP-NF, and JP monograph requirements. Since no chemical modifications occur during co-processing, individual chemical identities are maintained. Therefore, can be considered as a physical blend of alpha-lactose monohydrate and native maize starch. A drug master file (DMF) is available during FDA (Food and Drug Administration) drug product submission review and approval. The native maize starch used during manufacture is GMO-free (genetically modified organism) and gluten-free. Specifications and regulatory documents can be downloaded from www.meggle-pharma.com. Our pharma-dedicated production facility in Wasserburg, Germany is certified according to DIN ISO 91:28, has implemented cgmp according to the Joint IPEC-PQG Good Manufacturing Practices Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients and USP General Information Chapter <178>. The Wasserburg facility demonstrates MEGGLE s complete lactose production capability range, including sieving, milling, agglomeration, spray-drying, and co-processing. Additionally MEGGLE is a member of IPEC (International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council). MEGGLE invests considerably in raw material resource sustainability, production standards, efficiency and is actively engaged in environmental protection. Excipients meeting pharmaceutical standards is our first priority. Application is designed for direct compression and may be used in other formulation development approaches. In comparison to a physical blend of the individual components, provides superior flow, improved compaction, decreased lubricant sensitivity, and hardness-independent tablet disintegration. Because possesses brittle and plastic deformation characteristics, it also can be used in dry granulation formulations. Direct compression ODT formulations Dry granulation BENEFITS Excellent compactability Excellent flowability Rapid, hardness-independent tablet disintegration Compaction and hydration properties independent of hydrophobic lubricant type or level MEGGLE Co-processed lactose 9-25-214 3

Particle size distribution (PSD) Figure 2 shows typical laser diffraction particle size distribution data for. possesses a narrow PSD that supports homogenous powder blend preparation, essential for achieving good tablet quality. Figure 3 depicts the specified PSD range and typical average values by air jet sieving. These parameters are constantly monitored through in-process-control (IPC) testing and are part of the particle size distribution specification. Typical particle size distribution (Laser diffraction) co-processed grade, cumulative PSD Cumulative distribution Q3(x)/% 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 Particle size (µm) Typical particle size distribution (Laser diffraction) co-processed grade, distribution density Distribution density q3lg(x) 1.8 1.4 1.2 1..8.6.4.2 1 1 1 1 Particle size (µm) Figure 2: Typical cumulative PSD and distribution density of MEGGLE s. Analyzed by Sympatec /Helos & Rodos particle size analyzer. Sieve data co-processed lactose Lactose type specified/typical Particle size distribution Method: Air jet sieving < 32 µm NMT 15 %/6 % < 16 µm 35 65 %/49 % < 25 µm NLT 8 %/9 % < 315 µm /99 % Figure 3: Specified PSDs for by air jet sieve in bold letters. Typical values obtained from a permanent in-process-control are shown for orientation. 4 MEGGLE Co-processed lactose 9-25-214

Batch-to-batch consistency Isotherms Batch-to-batch consistency for all lactose products can be attributed to MEGGLE s long history and experience in lactose manufacture, and broad technical expertise. Constant in-process and final product testing ensures consistency and quality (Figure 4). exhibits moderate moisture uptake under high relative humidity conditions due to the starch influence on the observed equilibrium moisture content (Figure 5). Batch-to-batch consistency particle size distribution co-processed lactose Passing through 1 sieve (%) 8 6 4 2 Particle size (µm) < 32 < 16 < 25 < 315 Specified NMT 15 % 35 65 % NLT 8 % Mean IPC value (%) 6.1 48.9 9.3 99. SD (%) 1.4 2.8 1.3.5 Sorption isotherm (Dynamic vapor sorption at 2 C) Weight change (%) 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. 2 4 6 8 1 Relative humidity (%) Sorption Desorption Figure 4: particle size distribution batch-to-batch consistency by air jet sieve analysis. Data obtained from a permanent in-process-control (IPC) of subsequent batches over 12 months. Figure 5: Sorption-desorption isotherm of. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) Figure 6: SEM Image of MEGGLE s. 8 µm is nearly spherical in shape due to the co-spray-drying manufacturing process. s overall morphology reduces blend segregation and improves finished dosage form content uniformity (Figure 6). MEGGLE Co-processed lactose 9-25-214 5

Functional related characteristics Volume flow Volume flow rate (ml/s) 1 8 6 4 2 4 8 12 16 2 Aperture (mm) FlowLac 9 + native corn starch Figure 7: Volume flow rate (ml/s) as a function of aperture size (mm diameter) for and a comparable physical blend analyzed by a FlowRatex. Flowability Flowability index (mm) 25 Powder flow In assessing powder flow using a FlowRatex apparatus, exhibited superior flowability compared to a physical blend made up of spray-dried lactose and maize starch. The simple blend of individual ingredients showed greater flow variation compared to (Figure 7). also possessed lower flowability index ( = 2 mm, physical blend = 16 mm), indicating superior flowability (Figure 8). Flowability can also be described by the Hausner ratio, Carr s index, or angle of repose. A Hausner ratio below 1.25 or Carr s index below 2 indicates that powders are freely flowing. Angle of repose describes good flowability between 31 35, and in general, worsens with steeper angles. Figure 9 shows typical flowability indices for, indicating excellent flowability. 2 Poor flow 15 Moderate flow 1 Good flow 5 Very good flow Excellent flow FlowLac 9 + native corn starch Flowability Co-processed lactose Angle of repose ( ) Density bulk (g/l) Density tapped (g/l) Hausner ratio Carr s index (%) 29 54 67 1.24 19.4 Figure 8: Flowability index of and its corresponding physical blend. Smaller values indicate better flowability. Figure 9: Flowability/processability related parameters of. Compactability Tablet hardness (N) 2 15 Compactability and friability The results have shown that s compactability is superior to a comparable physical blend of the individual components in the same ratio (Figure 1). Due to excellent compactability, low friability (< 1 %) is given (Figure 11), eliminating the need for a protective coating. 1 5 1 2 3 4 Compaction force (kn) Tablet press: IMA Styl one 15ML, Tablets: Ø 11.3 mm, 5 mg Tablettose 8 Tablettose 8 + native corn starch 85:15 Figure 1: Tablet hardness profile for compared to a physical blend of the individual components and Tablettose 8 (granulated lactose). Tablets were produced using a tablet press: IMA Styl one fittet with 11,3 mm punches. Average tablet weight was targeted at 5 mg. 6 MEGGLE Co-processed lactose 9-25-214

Friability Friability (%) 5 Robustness Disintegration time (sec) 2 4 3 2 1 15 1 5 1 2 3 Tenslile strength (N/mm 2 ) Tablettose 8 + native corn starch 85:15 3 8 13 18 Tablet hardness (N) +.5 % Magnesium stearate +.1 % Magnesium stearate Physical blend +.5 % Magnesium stearate Physical blend +.1 % Magnesium stearate Figure 11: Friability of tablets produced either with or its corresponding physical blend. Figure 12: Tablet disintegration profile showing hardness and lubricant level independent disintegration times. Disintegration and Dissolution Superior hydration characteristics make ideal where rapid tablet disintegration is desired. In addition, tablet disintegration is independent of lubricant level and tablet hardness. A physical blend comprising lactose and starch demonstrated significant lubricant sensitivity and tablet hardness dependency, by comparison (Figures 12 and 13). As a result of tablet disintegration data, follow-up studies revealed accelerated API dissolution when using (Figure 14). The hardness independent and lubricant insensitivity exhibited by also make it a candidate for orally disintegrating/dispersible tablet (ODT) applications. Disintegration Disintegration time (sec) 8 6 4 2 Sodium stearyl fumarate (SSF) Physical blend Lubricant Glyceryl Mg stearate behenate PEG +.1 % SSF Figure 13: Tablet disintegration time for tablets produced with compared to a physical blend of the individual ingredients. Powders were lubricated to.5 % as shown. Packaging and shelf life Packaging material complies with Regulation (EC) No. 1935/24 and 21 CFR 174, 175, 176, 177 and 178. Stability tests have been performed according to ICH guidelines and an ongoing stability program is implemented. Figure 15 provides an overview about packaging size and material, and product shelf life. Dissolution of ascorbic acid tablets Dissolution (%) 8 6 4 2 Packaging and shelf life Size Material Shelf life 25 kg Paper bag with PE-EVOH-PE-inliner 36 months 5 1 15 2 25 Time (min) Physical blend Figure 15: Packaging and shelf life of MEGGLE s. Figure 14: Dissolution profiles for ascorbic acid formulations (3 % loading) produced with compared to a physical blend. MEGGLE Co-processed lactose 9-25-214 7

Literature MEGGLE App: [1] Meeus, L. (211). Direct Compression versus Granulation. Pharmaceutical Technology, 23(3). [2] Kristensen, H. G., & Schaefer, T. (1987). Granulation: A Review on Pharmaceutical Wet-Granulation. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 13(4 5), 83 872. [3] Mîinea, L. A., Mehta, R., Kallam, M., Farina, J. A., & Deorkar, N. (211). Evaluation and Characteristics of a New Direct Compression Performance Excipient, 35(3). MEGGLE Consultant MEGGLE Group Wasserburg BG Excipients & Technology Megglestrasse 6 12 83512 Wasserburg Germany Phone +49 871 73 476 Fax +49 871 73 32 service.pharma@meggle.de www.meggle-pharma.com MEGGLE warrants that its products conform to MEGGLE s written specification and makes no other expressed or implied warrantees or representations. For any specific usage, the determination of suitability of use or application of MEGGLE products is the sole responsibility of the user. The determination of the use, application, and compliance of this product with regard to any national, regional, or local laws and/or regulations is the sole responsibility of the user, and MEGGLE makes no representation with regards to same. Nothing herein shall be construed as a recommendation or license to use the product or any information that conflicts with any patent or intellectual property of MEGGLE or others and any such determination of use is the sole responsibility of the user. MEGGLE US 9-25-214 Sai