Tools to Aid in the Accurate Diagnosis of. Connective Tissue Disease

Similar documents
Clinical Laboratory. [None

Clinical Laboratory. 14:41:00 Complement Component 3 50 mg/dl Oct-18

Clinical Laboratory. 14:42:00 SSA-52 (Ro52) (ENA) Antibody, IgG 1 AU/mL [0-40] Oct-18

This month, we are very pleased to introduce some new tests for Scleroderma as well as some test changes to our existing scleroderma tests/panels.

Budsakorn Darawankul, MD. Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital

Autoantibodies in the Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

Test Name Results Units Bio. Ref. Interval

Test Name Results Units Bio. Ref. Interval

Autoantibodies panel ANA

The Power of the ANA. April 2018 Emily Littlejohn, DO MPH

Test Name Results Units Bio. Ref. Interval

Disclosures. Rheumatological Approaches to Differential Diagnosis, Physical Examination, and Interpretation of Studies. None

Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease and Overlap Syndromes. Mark S. Box, MD

Autoimmune (AI) Disorders

IBD Tools to Aid in the Accurate Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

What your autoantibodies tell us about your disease. Mark Gourley, MD

What will we discuss today?

Autoantibodies giving rise to cytoplasmic IIF staining using HEp-2 cell substrate

Assays. New. New. Combinations. Possibilities. Patents: EP , AU

Is it Autoimmune or NOT! Presented to AONP! October 2015!

NATIONAL LABORATORY HANDBOOK. Laboratory Testing for Antinuclear antibodies

Prevalence of anti-dfs70 antibodies in patients with and without systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Comparison of Performance of ELISA with Indirect Immunofluoresence for the Testing of Antinuclear Antibodies

Association of Immunofluorescence pattern of Antinuclear Antibody with Specific Autoantibodies in the Bangladeshi Population

University of Pretoria

Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence and line immunoassay for autoantibody detection

INTERPRETATION OF LABORATORY TESTS IN RHEUMATIC DISEASE

Disclosures. Clinical Approach: Evaluating CTD-ILD for the pulmonologist. ILD in CTD. connective tissue disease or collagen vascular disease

Autoimmune diseases. SLIDE 3: Introduction to autoimmune diseases Chronic

Significance of antibody testing in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Interpreting Rheumatologic Lab Tests

High Impact Rheumatology

INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., 9900 Old Grove Road, San Diego, CA , USA 2

Insights into the DX of Pediatric SLE

The many faces of myositis. Marianne de Visser Academic Medical Centre Dept of Neurology Amsterdam The Netherlands

A Multiplex Autoantibody Panel for Early Detection of Autoimmune Disease Activity

VASCULITIS PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS

Measurement of Antinuclear Antibodies: Assessment of Different Test Systems

Mechanisms of Autontibodies

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences

QUANTA Lite TM ANA ELISA

Myositis and Your Lungs

2/23/18. Disclosures. Rheumatic Diseases of Childhood. Making Room for Rheumatology. I have nothing to disclose. James J.

Undifferentiated connective tissue diseases in 2004

Rheumatology 101 A Pediatrician s Guide

What are Autoantibodies and how do they work in Myositis?

Autoimmune diagnostics. A comprehensive product line for the detection of autoantibodies

Marilina Tampoia, MD; Vincenzo Brescia, MD; Antonietta Fontana, MD; Antonietta Zucano, PhD; Luigi Francesco Morrone, MD; Nicola Pansini, MD

Technical Article Series Scleroderma ANA and Antibody Testing

Clinical performance evaluation of a novel, automated chemiluminescent immunoassay, QUANTA Flash CTD Screen Plus

Overview of Diagnostic Autoantibodies in Inflammatory Myopathy

Essential Rheumatology. Dr Ellen Bruce Consultant Rheumatologist CMFT

significance and association with selective antinuclear antibodies

Autoantibodies andprognosis. Jiří Vencovský Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic

Autoantibodies in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies. Vidya Limaye Rheumatology Department Royal Adelaide Hospital

*Pari Basharat ABSTRACT OVERVIEW OF IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES

UPDATES ON PEDIATRIC SLE

AccuSet Autoimmune Performance Panel

Rheumatologic Testing in Primary Care

Atlas of Antinuclear Antibodies

Late onset systemic lupus erythematosus in southern Chinese. Citation Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 1998, v. 57 n. 7, p.

Advances in Laboratory Testing for Rheumatic Diseases Updates in Testing for Rheumatic Diseases. The ABIM s view of rheumatologic lab testing

LUPUS. and Associated Conditions LUPUSUK 2018

Screening of Extractable Nuclear Antibodies by ELISA in Patients with Connective Tissue Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Diagnostic Tests in Rheumatic Disease: What s Old, What s New & What s Useful? COPYRIGHT

INCREASING INCIDENCE OF IMMUNE MEDIATED NECROTIZING MYOPATHY SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

SCLERODERMA OVERLAP SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT Diwakar K. Singh 1, Nataraju H. V 2

ANA Diagnostics Using Indirect Immunofluorescence

Received June 29, 2012; accepted July 31, 2012; Epub August 22, 2012; Published September 15, 2012

Research Article Performance Characteristics of Different Anti-Double-Stranded DNA Antibody Assays in the Monitoring of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Reporting Autoimmune Diseases in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Section: Medicine Effective Date: January 15, 2016 Subsection: Pathology/Laboratory Original Policy Date: December 5, 2014 Subject:

Rhematologic serum testing is: Before request serologic tests, ANCA associated antigens c-anca: most commonly against the proteinase 3 (PR-3)

Guidelines for Immunologic Laboratory Testing in the Rheumatic Diseases: Anti-Sm and Anti-RNP Antibody Tests

Original Article. Abstract

Confirmation of anti-dfs70 antibodies is needed in routine clinical samples with DFS staining pattern

LUPUS. and Associated Conditions LUPUSUK 2015

Thomas A. Medsger, Jr., MD University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Disclosures: None

Policy. Background

ANA testing can now be ordered in several ways, depending on the clinical circumstances:

SLE-key Case Studies

The Diagnosis of Lupus

Advances in Autoantibody Testing & Clinical Applications

Interpretation of Immunological Investigations in Clinical Practice

Review. Undifferentiated connective tissue diseases (UCTD): A review of the literature and a proposal for preliminary classification criteria

Rheumatology Labs for the General Internist. Adam J Grunbaum DO FACOI FACR ACOI Annual Convention and Scientific Sessions 2018

We also assessed the diagnostic significance of the SUBJECTS

Laboratory diagnosis of autoimmune diseases

Cutaneous manifestations and systemic correlation in patients with lupus erythematosus and its subsets: a study of 40 cases

Benlysta (belimumab) Prior Authorization Criteria Program Summary

Development of SLE among Possible SLE Patients Seen in Consultation: Long-Term Follow-Up. Disclosures. Background. Evidence-Based Medicine.

MANAGING THE PATIENT WITH POSITIVE ANA

Inflammatory Myopathies 4 th year MBBS. Marwan Adwan MBChB, MSc, MRCPI, MRCP(rheum) Consultant Rheumatologist

Name and Intended Use

Screening of Auto Antibodies using Indirect Immunofluorescence in Auto Immune Disease Patients

Autoantibody Standardizing Committee

Policy. Section: Medicine Effective Date: January 15, 2015 Subsection: Pathology/Laboratory Original Policy Date: December 5, 2014 Subject:

DRAFT FOR POC BOARD Clinical Commissioning Policy Proposition: Rituximab in Connective Tissue Disease associated Interstitial Lung Disease (adults)

Pitfalls of doing ANA immunofluorescence Can we define false positive? Can we define false negative? Can results be compared between labs?

Transcription:

Connective Tissue Disease Tools to Aid in the Accurate Diagnosis of Connective Tissue Disease

Connective Tissue Disease High quality assays and novel tests Inova offers a complete array of assay methods, including immunofluorescence (IIF), enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA), and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA). The QUANTA Lite line of ELISAs covers the spectrum of CTD testing from screening assays with 4 or more antigens to specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA). The QUANTA Flash CIA assays offer broad dynamic range, high sensitivity and specificity. The QUANTA Flash assays for use on the BIO-FLASH system offer a robust menu including critical assays like QUANTA Flash dsdna to maximize the utility of this fully automated random access system. One of the most important first steps in CTD diagnosis is performing a screening test. Screening ANA by IIF is the gold-standard, as recently recommended by the American College of Rheumatology Task Force. To that end, Inova has revolutionized HEp-2 ANA screening by utilizing optimized antigen expression to allow identification of the most complicated cell structures with the NOVA Lite assays. A completely unique assay, NOVA Lite HEp-2 Select, reduces the rate of false positivity in routine ANA screening samples. This culminates into overall healthcare cost savings and efficiency. Disease overview The complex diagnosis of CTD involves a multitude of sometimes ambiguous clinical symptoms. The guide below highlights the most important clinical features and disease statistics. Native protein conformation preserved Disease Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a disease which affects multiple organs. The classic triad of fever, joint pain, and rash in a woman of childbearing age should prompt investigation into the diagnosis of SLE. Systemic sclerosis Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic, multisystem disorder characterized by thickening of the skin and accumulation of connective tissue in various organs. Sjögren's syndrome Sjögren's (SjS) syndrome is characterized by dry eyes and dry mouth. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a group of chronic conditions characterized by inflammation and degeneration of skeletal muscles. These disorders include dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Mixed Connective Tissue Disease Mixed Connective Tissue Disease (MCTD) patients exhibit varied combinations of features common to other autoimmune diseases such as SLE, polymyositis, rheumatoid arthritis, or scleroderma. Epidemiology - Worldwide, the prevalence varies by race; typically 50 cases per 100,000 persons - African American women have a higher rate of SLE than women of any other race, followed by Asian women and then white women - Female to male ratio is 9:1; onset is usually after puberty - Prevalence is estimated at 240 cases per 1,000,000 persons - Female to male ratio ranges from 4-9:1; onset typically occurs at 30-50 years of age - Affects 0.1-4% of the population; this wide range reflects the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria - Homogeneous disease occurring worldwide with similar prevalence - Female to male ratio is 9:1; onset typically occurs 40-50 years of age - Very low prevalence disease; incidence is 4-10 per 1,000,000 persons - Age of onset varies - DM is bimodal with disease occurring in childhood and 50-70 years of age - PM typical onset is >20 years of age - IBM typical onset is >50 years of age - Females to male ratio is 2:1 in DM and PM - Males to female ratio is 2:1 in IBM - Prevalence of 1-2 per 100,000 persons - Typically occurs 15-25 years of age - Female to male ratio is 3:1 References SLE - Danchenko, N et al. Lupus 2006; 15(5):308-318. Blank, M et al. Lupus 2009; 18(13): 1136-1143. Klein-Gitelman, M et al. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2002; 28(3): 561-577. Scleroderma - Walker, J et al. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007; 19(6):580-591. Hsu, V et al. J Rheumatol. 2008; 35(3): 458-465. Sjögren's syndrome - Helmick, C et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(1):15-25. Inflammatory myopathies - Nasr, R et al. Curr Opin Rheum. 2012; 24(6): 609-615. Ernste, F et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013; 88(1): 83-105. MCTD - Aringer, M et al. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007; 21(6): 1037-1049. Swanton, J et al. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2005; 31(3): 421-436.

Potential Testing Algorithm for Connective Tissue Disease ANA HEp-2 Positive Negative Homogeneous Fine speckled Coarse speckled Nucleolar Cytoplasmic Dense fine speckled (DFS) or DFS-like pattern following tests: ENA screen dsdna Ro52 Ro60 (SSA) SSB Sm RNP Scl-70 following test: following test: RNA polymerase following tests: Jo-1 Ribosome P Test for DFS70 antibodies; test for individual ENA antibodies as necessary Negative test results CTD inconclusive 5 Positive test results CTD very likely DFS70 positive ENA testing positive CTD inconclusive DFS70 negative ENA testing positive CTD likely # DFS70 negative ENA testing negative CTD inconclusive DFS70 positive ENA testing negative CTD unlikely 5 Likelihood depends on IIF pattern obtained # CTD is likely if results can be confirmed (e.g., ENA sub-differentiation). Further studies are needed to determine the likelihood. Testing CTD likely CTD unlikely CTD inconclusive Testing strategies provided for informational purposes only. Testing and diagnosis should be determined by a licensed clinician.

Important assays you should know about Critical answers to complicated cases High prevalence of anti-dfs70 antibodies in routine screening cohorts Screening patients suspected of having systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease by HEp-2 is the gold-standard method. However, based on the population being tested, the frequency of false positive ANA results may be quite high. It has been recently discovered that a majority of such positives are the result of anti-dfs70 antibodies. Anti-DFS70 antibodies are responsible for as much as 15% of positive HEp-2 results in routine testing even though these antibodies are not associated with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease. ANA positive results often contribute to high anxiety both among patients and clinicians. Confirming isolated anti-dfs70 positivity reduces unnecessary reflex and follow-up testing, while lessening patient concerns. Adsorption of anti-dfs70 antibodies by NOVA Lite HEp-2 Select, reduces HEp-2 positivity rates thereby increasing overall healthcare efficiency The presence of anti-dfs70 antibodies can be positively confirmed by using the QUANTA Flash DFS70 assay Characteristic dense fine speckled pattern is a challenge to interpret by IFA Anti-C1q antibodies may be prognostic for lupus flares Over 50% of SLE patients will display nephritis. Predicting flare up activity is essential to preventing further relapses and subsequent renal damage. According to Akhter, E. et al. 2010: Anti-C1q may play a role in the propagation of SLE by enhancing the development of anti-dsdna and other glomerular-targeting autoantibodies, by reducing the amount of C1q available for effective clearance of these antigens or by enhancing the pathogenicity of C1qcontaining immune complexes. Compared to dsdna, chromatin, and ribosomal P autoantibodies, anti-c1q is the only marker associated with both global and renal activity as well as the SLICC renal activity score. Anti-HMGCR antibodies and their association with statin associated myopathies Statins are among the most commonly prescribed medications that significantly reduce cardiovascular risk. However, these drugs can also be associated with muscle symptoms ranging from mild myalgias to severe rhabdomyolysis. Although statin myotoxicity is usually self-limited, in some instances statin-exposed subjects can develop an autoimmune myopathy typically characterized by progressive weakness, muscle enzyme elevations, a necrotizing myopathy on muscle biopsy, and autoantibodies that recognize 3-hydroxy-3- methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), the pharmacologic target of statins. These antibodies are also found in some autoimmune myopathy patients without statin exposure. Dense fine speckled pattern of resting cell (blue arrow) Chromatin staining of mitotic cell (red arrow) Testing for anti-hmgcr antibodies may help differentiate those with self-limited statin myopathy who recover after statin discontinuation from those with a progressive statin-associated autoimmune myopathy who require immunosuppressive therapy. References DFS70 Mahler, M et al. J Rheum 2012; 39 (11); 2104-2110. C1q Akhter, E et al. Lupus 2011; (20) 12: 1267-1274. HMGCR Mohassel, P. et al. Muscle & Nerve 2013; DOI 10.1002/mus. 23854 *QUANTA Flash DFS70 is available outside the USA only

Connective Tissue Disease SLE specific Autoantibody Prevalence of autoantibodies in various conditions and clinical associations # Estimated autoantibody frequency Clinical association(s) dsdna 30-90% Classification marker for SLE ; lupus nephritis Sm 10-30% Classification marker for SLE ; frequent in African Americans Ribosomal P 10-20% Frequent in Asians; can be present in isolation to other SLE autoantibodies Chromatin 30-90% Helpful in cases of anti-dsdna negative SLE patients; lupus nephritis Histone 50-70% Helpful for differentiating between SLE and drug induced lupus C1q 30-60% SLE and lupus nephritis SLE associated SSc SjS RNP 25-40% Not specific for SLE Ro52 40-60% Ro52 autoantibodies are usually detected in conjunction with Ro60 (SSA); congenital heart block in babies born to women with SLE Ro60 (SSA) 20-60% Secondary SjS; discoid rash and photosensitivity SSB 10-30% Secondary SjS; discoid rash and photosensitivity 20-60% Scl-70 15-40% RNA Polymerase III <20% Classification marker for SSc; CREST syndrome, limited SSc, Raynaud's phenomenon, low occurance of pulmonary fibrosis Classification marker for SSc; diffuse skin involvement, pulmonary interstitial fibrosis, increased mortality rate Classification marker for SSc; highly specific for diffuse cutaneous disease; heart and kidney involvement Th/To <10% Limited cutaneous SSC and interstitial lung disease Ro52 37-75% Ro52 autoantibodies are usually detected in conjunction with Ro60 (SSA) autoantibodies Ro60 (SSA) 50-80% Classification marker for SjS SSB 40-60% Classification marker for SjS Jo-1 10-40% Interstitial lung disease, Raynaud phenomenon, and antisynthetase syndrome Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies PM/Scl 10-25% SSc polymyositis overlap Ro52 20-35% HMGCR <10% Polymyositis with antisynthetase syndrome; often detected in conjunction with Jo-1 autoantibodies Statin associated myopathy; useful to differentiate patients with self-limited statin myopathy vs patients with a progressive statin-associated autoimmune myopathy who require immunosuppressive therapy Mi-2 <25% Very specific marker; often seen in dermatomyositis SRP <5% Polymyositis; does not occur with overlap syndromes Ku <5% Overlap syndromes MCTD RNP ~ 100%* Classification marker for MCTD Non-connective tissue disease DFS70 5-10% Common cause of positive ANA result in healthy or non-ctd individuals; isolated presence is not associated with CTD References SLE Salvador, I. et al. J Trans Med 2012; 10 (3): 41. Menendez, A. et al. Sci World 2013; article ID 832789, 8 pages. Systemic sclerosis Gussin, H et al. Arth Rheum 2001; 44: 376-383. Ramos-Casals, M et al. BMJ 2012: 344:e3821. Schulte-Pelkum, J et al. Autoimm Rev 2009; 8: 632-637. Sjögren's syndrome Fox, R et al. Lancet 2005; 366: 321-331. Shiboski, SC et al. Arthritis Care Res 2012; 64 (4): 475-487. Inflammatory myopathy De Santis, M et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71(9): 1461-1465. MCTD Gunnarsson, R et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70 (6): 1047-1051. DFS70 Mahler, M et al. J Rheum 2012; 39 (11); 2104-2110. # Autoantibodies listed reflect current or planned Inova offering * Anti-RNP are classification criteria autoantibodies. Actual frequency of detection may be lower than 100%.

Comprehensive offering of assays Method Name Method Name NOVA Lite IIF HEp-2 DAPI ANA QUANTA Lite ELISA ANA dsdna HEp-2 Select* dsdna SC dsdna Crithidia luciliae HA dsdna QUANTA Flash CIA dsdna Crithidia luciliae DAPI conjugate ENA 7 Jo-1 RNP Sm Ro60 (SSA) Ro52 SSB Scl-70 CTD Screen Plus* RiboP* DFS70* dsdna Chromatin C1q* C1q CIC Histone HMGCR* Jo-1 Ribosome P RNA Polymerase III RNP Scl-70 Sm SSA SSA 52 SSB ssdna ENA 4 ENA 5 ENA 6 ENA Profile* *Available outside the USA only www.inovadx.com San Diego, CA 92131 USA PH: +1-858-586-9900 US Toll Free: 1-800-545-9495 FAX: +1-858-586-9911 QUANTA Lite, QUANTA Flash, and NOVA Lite are registered trademarks of Inova Diagnostics, Inc. 2016 Inova Diagnostics, Inc. All rights reserved. BIO-FLASH is a registered trademark of Biokit SA 2016 Inova Diagnostics, Inc. and Biokit SA. All rights reserved. 690383 June 2016 Rev. 5