CURRENT CT DOSE METRICS: MAKING CTDI SIZE-SPECIFIC

Similar documents
ESTABLISHING DRLs in PEDIATRIC CT. Keith Strauss, MSc, FAAPM, FACR Cincinnati Children s Hospital University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

8/18/2011. Acknowledgements. Managing Pediatric CT Patient Doses INTRODUCTION

CT Dose Estimation. John M. Boone, Ph.D., FAAPM, FSBI, FACR Professor and Vice Chair of Radiology. University of California Davis Medical Center

Dianna Cody, PhD, DABR, FAAPM Professor & Clinical Operations Director Imaging Physics U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX

State of the art and future development for standardized estimation of organ doses in CT

Patient Dose Estimates. from CT Examinations. Patient Dose Estimates

Computed tomography Acceptance testing and dose measurements

Toshiba Aquillion 64 CT Scanner. Phantom Center Periphery Center Periphery Center Periphery

IMAGE GENTLY HOW CAN YOU HELP?

Doses from pediatric CT examinations in Norway Are pediatric scan protocols developed and in daily use?

Estimating Patient Radiation Dose from Computed Tomography

Acknowledgments. A Specific Diagnostic Task: Lung Nodule Detection. A Specific Diagnostic Task: Chest CT Protocols. Chest CT Protocols

Accounting for Imaging Dose

Measurement of organ dose in abdomen-pelvis CT exam as a function of ma, KV and scanner type by Monte Carlo method

Thoracic examinations with 16, 64, 128 and 256 slices CT: comparison of exposure doses measured with an anthropomorphic phantom and TLD dosimeters

Re: PSM of the National Voluntary Consensus Standard for Patient Safety Measures, 2 nd Report

CT Dosimetry in the Clinical Environment: Methods and Analysis

A more accurate method to estimate patient dose during body CT examinations with tube current modulation

Doses from Cervical Spine Computed Tomography (CT) examinations in the UK. John Holroyd and Sue Edyvean

Managing Radiation Risk in Pediatric CT Imaging

Conventional and spiral CT dose indices in Yazd general hospitals, Iran

National Cancer Institute

Why is CT Dose of Interest?

Translating Protocols Across Patient Size: Babies to Bariatric

SOMATOM Drive System Owner Manual Dosimetry and imaging performance report

Patient / Organ Dose in CT

Adopting DAP as a dose metric in CT

CT Radiation Dosimetry Study Using Monte Carlo Simulation and. Computational Anthropomorphic Phantoms

CTDI versus New AAPM Metrics to assess Doses in CT: a case study

Tracking Doses in the Pediatric Population

CT Optimisation for Paediatric SPECT/CT Examinations. Sarah Bell

THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER GRADUATE COLLEGE RADIATION DOSE ESTIMATION FOR DIAGNOSTIC MODALITIES

Measurement of computed tomography dose profile with pitch variation using Gafchromic XR-QA2 and thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD)

A comparison of radiation doses from modern multi-slice Computed Tomography angiography and conventional diagnostic Angiography:

Breast CT and Dosimetry

How to Develop CT Protocols for Children

Quality Control and Patient Dosimetry on line for Computed Tomography

Radiation Dose Reduction Strategies in Coronary CT Angiography

Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research

Original Article Thoracic Imaging

Patient Radiation Doses from Adult and Pediatric CT

Survey of patients CT radiation dose in Jiangsu Province

Prof. Dr. Doğan BOR Ankara University Institute of Nuclear Science

An Update of VirtualDose Software Used for Assessing Patient Organ Doses from CT Examinations

Introduction. Modalities used in imaging guidance. Flat panel detector. X-ray Imaging Dose to Patients in the Era of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

Chief Radiographer TEI Clinical Associate 2016

Measurements of Air Kerma Index in Computed Tomography: A comparison among methodologies

Fetal Dose Calculations and Impact on Patient Care

Calculation of Effective Doses for Radiotherapy Cone-Beam CT and Nuclear Medicine Hawkeye CT Laura Sawyer

Automatic Patient Centering for MDCT: Effect on Radiation Dose

SPECIFIC PRINCIPLES FOR DOSE REDUCTION IN HEAD CT IMAGING. Rajiv Gupta, MD, PhD Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School

Patient Dosimetry in Mammography and Tomosynthesis:

A multicentric study on patient dose in multislice CT

FDG-18 PET/CT - radiation dose and dose-reduction strategy

To Shield or Not to Shield? Lincoln L. Berland, M.D.

Figure 1.1 PHITS geometry for PTB irradiations with: broad beam, upper panel; mono energetic beams, lower panel. Pictures of the setups and of the

Bone Densitometry Radiation dose: what you need to know

X-Ray & CT Physics / Clinical CT

Implementation of the 2012 ACR CT QC Manual in a Community Hospital Setting BRUCE E. HASSELQUIST, PH.D., DABR, DABSNM ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL

Skyscan 1076 in vivo scanning: X-ray dosimetry

CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction

Cone Beam CT Protocol Optimisation for Prostate Imaging with the Varian Radiotherapy OBI imaging system. Dr Craig Moore & Dr Tim Wood

Optimizing radiation dose by varying age at pediatric temporal bone CT

Machine Learning Powered Automatic Organ Classification for Patient Specific Organ Dose Estimation

Estimated Radiation Dose Associated With Low-Dose Chest CT of Average-Size Participants in the National Lung Screening Trial

Radiation Dosimetry for CT Protocols

Varian Edge Experience. Jinkoo Kim, Ph.D Henry Ford Health System

Regional diagnostic reference levels and collective effective doses from CT scanners in India

Ask EuroSafe Imaging. Tips & Tricks. CT Working Group. Optimization of scan length to reduce CT radiation dose

Radiation Dose Reduction: Should You Use a Bismuth Breast Shield?

Assessment of Patient Dose from CT Examinations in Khorasan, Iran

American College of Radiology CT Accreditation Program. Testing Instructions

3/5/2015. Don t Electrocute Me!: Common Misconceptions in Imaging and Radiation Safety (and What to Do About Them)

Calculation of Normalised Organ and Effective Doses to Adult Reference Computational Phantoms from Contemporary Computed Tomography Scanners

Estimating Iodine Concentration from CT Number Enhancement

Using body mass index to estimate individualised patient radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography

Dose to Radiosensitive Organs During Routine Chest CT: Effects of Tube Current Modulation

Introduction and Background

Managing the imaging dose during Image-guided Radiotherapy. Martin J Murphy PhD Department of Radiation Oncology Virginia Commonwealth University

AAPM Task Group 180 Image Guidance Doses Delivered During Radiotherapy: Quantification, Management, and Reduction

Automated CT Protocol Design Advantages and Pitfalls of Algorithm-Based Technique Selection in Pediatrics. Disclosures 7/22/2014. Learning Objectives

CT Quality Control Manual FAQs

Radiation Dose To Pediatric Patients in Computed Tomography in Sudan

True Dual Energy. Dr. Stefan Ulzheimer, Siemens Healthcare GmbH. DEfinitely Siemens

ACR AAPM PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS AND ACHIEVABLE DOSES IN MEDICAL X-RAY IMAGING

Dual-Energy 101: Principles, Methods and Dose

CT Dose Optimization for Whole- Body PET/CT Examinations

Reducing Radiation Dose in Body CT: A Primer on Dose Metrics and Key CT Technical Parameters

Multislice CT versus cone beam CT: dosimetric and image quality comparision.

ABSTRACT. Objectives: To investigate the radiation dose received by patients undergoing routine plain x-ray

ORGAN DOSES FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS: VALIDATION OF MONTE CARLO CALCULATIONS USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS

Assessment of effective dose in paediatric CT examinations

IAEA HUMAN HEALTH REPORTS No. 5. Status of Computed Tomography Dosimetry for Wide Cone Beam Scanners

Impact of ICRP-89 Based Models on Dose Estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals and CT Exams. Stabin MG, Kost SD, Clark JH, Pickens DR, Price RR, Carver DE

Implementation & optimization of a lung cancer screening CT program. Presented by Izabella Barreto at the 2016 Florida AAPM Chapter Meeting

An audit of radiation dose of 4D CT in a radiotherapy department

Radiology Review Course Hotel del Coronado Coronado, California

DANIEL J. LONG UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

Ultralow Dose Chest CT with MBIR

GATE MONTE CARLO DOSIMETRY SIMULATION OF MARS SPECTRAL CT

Transcription:

CURRENT CT DOSE METRICS: MAKING CTDI SIZE-SPECIFIC Keith Strauss, MSc, FAAPM, FACR Cincinnati Children s Hospital University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

Acknowledgments John Boone, PhD Michael McNitt-Grey, PhD Cynthia McCollough, PhD Dianna Cody, PhD Tom Toth, PhD G. Donald Frey, PhD

CT Dose Indices INTRODUCTION CTDI CTDI 100, CTDI w, CTDI vol Displayed vs Measured CTDI vol DLP Clinical Dilemma SSDE E Dose Limitations Simple Application of SSDE in the Clinic Estimating Organ Doses from SSDE

REAL WORLD. Radiation distribution crosses the imaged volume Peak dose Tails of dose distribution Adapted from Frey - 5 mm 0 + 5 mm

CTDI = Integral under the radiation dose profile along the z-axis from a single axial scan of width nt. radiation dose profile nt nominal beam width = total nominal scan width Adapted from Frey Z

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) Represents the average integrated absorbed dose along the z axis from a series of contiguous irradiations. CTDI 100 represents accumulated multiple scan dose at center of 100 mm scan.

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Measurement of CT Radiation Dose Plastic cylindrical phantoms: CTDI Phantoms (PMMA) 16 & 32 cm diameter Pencil chamber moved into provided holes to measure radiation dose peripheral hole Center of phantom Non measured holes plugged center hole Adapted from TG204 PMMA plug 100 mm pencil chamber

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Measurement of CT Radiation Dose Plastic cylindrical phantoms: CTDI Phantoms (PMMA) 16 & 32 cm diameter Pencil chamber moved into provided holes to measure radiation dose peripheral hole Surface of phantom Non measured holes plugged center hole Adapted from TG204 100 mm pencil chamber PMMA plug

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Measurement of CT Radiation Dose 32 and 16 cm CTDI standard phantoms positioned to measure CT doses. Images Courtesy of John Boone

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Measurement of CT Radiation Dose Dose readings at two points in phantom 1 cm below surface 100 Center Dose distribution depends on phantom diameter 100 100 90 100 100 50 100 100 50 100 100 100

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Calculation of CTDI Values Weighted CTDI: CTDI w Average CTDI across the FoV CTDI w = 1/3 CTDI 100,center + 2/3 CTDI 100,edge CTDI w = 17 + 66 = 83 mgy for 32 cm CTDI phantom Ave Dose over x & y direction 100 100 50 100 100

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Measured CTDI vol Measure CTDI vol with identical scan parameters kv ma Rotation time Bow Tie Filter Use phantom 10, 16, and 32 cm diameter

Measured CTDI vol = 47 Measured CTDI vol = 37 Measured CTDI vol = 18 21.6 mgy 47 mgy 38 mgy 47 mgy 35 mgy 10.8 mgy 10 cm Diameter 16 cm Diameter 32 cm Diameter Measured CTDI vol increases 2.6 times as phantom size decreases!

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Displayed CTDI vol Dose that represents distribution of dose given to crosssectional area of a slab of the CTDI phantom (16 or 32 cm diameter) Reflects changes in: High voltage to x-ray tube (kv) X-ray tube current (ma) Rotation time (sec) Pitch Bow tie filter shape, thickness, material Source to detector distance

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Displayed CTDI vol Standardized method to estimate and compare the radiation output of two different CT scanners to same phantom. Dose index of CT scanners if the fan beam width in z direction of the patient is small (< 1 cm) If fan beam width (> 1 cm), dose index addressed by AAPM TG111

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Displayed CTDI vol does not represent... Patient dose!!

Measured CTDI vol = 47 Measured CTDI vol = 37 Measured CTDI vol = 18 21.6 mgy 47 mgy 47 mgy 38 mgy 35 mgy 10.8 mgy Displayed CTDI vol16 = 37 Displayed CTDI vol32 = 18 Displayed CTDI vol16 = 37 Displayed CTDI vol32 = 18 Displayed CTDI vol16 = 37 Displayed CTDI vol32 = 18

CTDI SHORTCOMING Same radiographic technique 32 cm CTDI Phantom Displayed CTDI vol = 18 mgy for both patients

CLINICAL DILEMMA Displayed CTDI vol on scanner is independent of patient size 16 cm CTDI phantom: adult dose over while pediatric dose under estimated. 32 cm CTDI phantom: adult and pediatric dose under estimated ~ 2.5 times! Propagated by DICOM Structured Reports and CT scanner dose reports.

CLINICAL DILEMMA CTDI Phantoms are not clinical models

CLINICAL DILEMMA Anthropomorphic Phantoms only approximate the human body

CT SCANNER DOSE INDICES Displayed Dose Length Product (DLP) DLP (mgycm) = CTDI vol * Scan Length Scan length is the length of phantom irradiated. Represents energy transferred. DLP is not a patient dose index because CTDI vol does not represent patient dose. SSDELP = SSDE * Scan Length Better estimate of energy transferred.

Adapted from Frey DLP = 200 mgy cm CTDIvol = 20 mgy ten 1-cm slices DLP = 400 mgy cm CTDIvol STILL = 20 mgy twenty 1-cm slices DLP represents the greater biologic risk!

Report does not: TG 204 Address correction factors for heads Correct small (< 1%) doses from scanned projection images. Correct for variation (~ 5%) in attenuation of thorax vs abdomen Correct small variation in pre and post contrast scans

So what is SSDE?: TG 204 Estimate of the average patient dose within the entire scan volume of patient. Adjusts for patient size and varying attenuation from overlying tissue thickness. Uses average scanner radiation output during CT scan: CTDI vol Output varies along z axis Output varies as beam rotates Output varies based on bow tie filter

TG 204 Data from four independent investigators studying patient size correction factors. Adapted from TG 204 Physical measurements on phantoms A. Anthropomorphic Phantoms (McCollough Laboratory Mc ) B. Cylindrical PMMA phantoms (Toth / Strauss Collaboration T-S ) Monte Carlo computer modeling C. Monte Carlo Voxelized Phantoms (McNitt-Gray Laboratory MG ) D. Monte Carlo Mathematical Cylinders (Boone Laboratory Z-B )

TG 204 0 0 1 1 5 51 1 0 0 1 5 1 5 32 cm 120 kv Adapted from TG 204

TG 204 0 1 5 1 0 1 5 16 cm 120 kv Adapted from TG 204

TG 204 What about scans performed at 80, 100, or 140 kv? from 120 kv only Combined TS / ZB: 80-140 kv 1. 5% difference overall 2. 3% difference between 1 yr old (15 cm) & adult (32 cm)

TG 204 What about scans performed in the thorax? 1. Thorax data from Huda et al. 2. 16% dif @ 12 cm 3. 7% dif @ 17 cm 4. < 3% dif > 17 cm Adapted from Boone

TG 204 What is an effective diameter? Circle with area of patient s cross section Effective diameter can be estimated if the patient s AP or lateral dimension is known. circle of equal area AP effective diameter lateral

AGE vs PATENT SIZE Same age patients vary dramatically in size. Abdomens of: Largest 3 year olds and Smallest adults are the same size. Patient cross section size, not age, should be used.

What if I am doing retrospective dose analysis and I only know age of patient? Corrections based on patient size are more accurate. Adapted from TG 204 Effective Diameter as a function of age per ICRU 74

TG 204 Determining patient size Measure Lateral dimension with mechanical calipers. Measure Lateral or AP dimension from AP or Lateral projection scan. Magnification Error Measure AP or LAT dimension from axial scan view. AP or PA Projection Scan Adapted from TG204 AP or PA Projection Scan Adapted from TG204

TG 204 Determining size of CTDI phantom your CT scanner used to estimate CTDI vol Failure to identify correct phantom, 16 or 32 cm leads to a systematic error of up to 100%. No standard exists. Choice may depend on: Selected protocol: adult or pediatric Selected scan field of view Year of manufacture Software level Make no assumptions: contact manufacturer of your unit through their service organization.

SSDE Accuracy 20% TG 204 Product is an estimate of patient dose Report doses with proper number of significant digits SSDE > 5 mgy: integers only, e.g. 7 or 23 mgy SSDE < 5 mgy: one decimal point, e.g. 2.7 or 4.5 mgy

SAMPLE CALCULATION: POST SCAN Determine size of patient AP = 9.9 cm; LAT = 12.3 cm AP + LAT = 22.2 cm 32 cm CTDI phantom assumed Displayed CTDI vol = 5.4 mgy 5.4 mgy x 2.5 = 13 mgy SSDE Adapted from TG 204

Caution: Effective Dose Limitations SSDE can NOT be substituted in place of CTDI vol when using k-factors to estimate Effective Doses from CT exam.

Effective Dose Limitations Can Effective Dose be used to estimate: An individual patient s radiation dose? Organ doses? ABSOLUTELY NOT, despite the fact that one can find numerous published papers that make this error!!

Effective Dose Limitations Effective Dose was originally defined to address radiation protection concerns of occupationally exposed workers. Effective dose can be used to facilitate a comparison of biological effects between diagnostic exams of different types.

Effective Dose Limitations Effective Dose Recommended Reading ICRP 103 Executive Summary AD Nixon, New ICRP recommendations, J Radiol Prot 2008. CJ Martin, Effective dose: How should it be applied to medical exposures?, BJR 2007 Rational approach to the clinical use of effective dose estimates, AJR 2011.

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE Phantom 16 CTDI 32 CTDI 16/32 CTDI CTDI vol SSDE SSDE SSDE Abdomen (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) Newborn 8 Sm Adult 12 Lg Adult 16 Setting up reference values for all size patients based on CTDI vol results in odd patient doses. \

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE Phantom 16 CTDI 32 CTDI 16/32 CTDI CTDI vol SSDE SSDE SSDE Abdomen (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) Newborn 8 9 Sm Adult 12 10 Lg Adult 16 7 Setting up reference values for all size patients based on CTDI vol results in odd patient doses. \

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE Phantom 16 CTDI 32 CTDI 16/32 CTDI CTDI vol SSDE SSDE SSDE Abdomen (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) Newborn 8 9 19 Sm Adult 12 10 20 Lg Adult 16 7 15 Setting up reference values for all size patients based on CTDI vol results in odd patient doses. \

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE Phantom 16 CTDI 32 CTDI 16/32 CTDI CTDI vol SSDE SSDE SSDE Abdomen (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) Newborn 8 9 19 9 Sm Adult 12 10 20 10 Lg Adult 16 7 15 15 Setting up reference values for all size patients based on CTDI vol results in odd patient doses. \

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE SSDE CTDI v16 CTDI v32 CTDI v16/32 Abdomen (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) Newborn 9 Sm Adult 12 Lg Adult 15 Setting up reference values for all size patients based on SSDE is more straight forward. \

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE SSDE CTDI v16 CTDI v32 CTDI v16/32 Abdomen (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) Newborn 9 8 Sm Adult 12 15 Lg Adult 15 35 Setting up reference values for all size patients based on SSDE is more straight forward. \

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE SSDE CTDI v16 CTDI v32 CTDI v16/32 Abdomen (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) Newborn 9 8 4 Sm Adult 12 15 7 Lg Adult 15 35 16 Setting up reference values for all size patients based on SSDE is more straight forward. \

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE SSDE CTDI v16 CTDI v32 CTDI v16/32 Abdomen (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) (mgy) Newborn 9 8 4 8 Sm Adult 12 15 7 15 Lg Adult 15 35 16 16 Setting up reference values for all size patients based on SSDE is more straight forward. \

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE SSDE estimates patient dose for both adult and pediatric patients. can be first approximation of some organ doses Soft tissues only Organ completely in scan volume in z direction. \

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE SSDE Can be first approximation of some organ doses: Radial dose profiles Range dependent on patient diameter Pediatric vs Adult? CTDI vol (83) 100 100 50 100 100

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SSDE SSDE Can be first approximation of some organ doses: Increased error for small organs depending on location. Less effect 100 50 for pediatrics 100 100 Adapted from McCollough 100

CONCLUSIONS Estimating and managing a patient s CT dose as a function of their size is facilitated by the use of SSDE provided: CTDI vol, CTDI phantom size assumed by the CT scanner, and Patient size are known.