Selinexor is an oral, slowly-reversible, first-inclass Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE)

Similar documents
Disclosure Slide. Research Support: Onconova Therapeutics, Celgene

Emerging Treatment Options for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Low Risk MDS Scoring System. Prognosis in Low Risk MDS. LR-PSS Validation 9/19/2012

Disclosure. Study was sponsored by Karyopharm Therapeutics No financial relationships to disclose Other disclosures:

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Summary of Key AML Abstracts Presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) June 22-25, 2017 Madrid, Spain

Emerging Treatment Options for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 2 Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, South San Francisco

Combination of Oral Rigosertib and Injectable Azacitidine in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

A Phase II Study on Efficacy, Safety and Intratumoral Pharmacokinetics of Oral Selinexor (KPT-330) in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma (GBM)

EHA 2017 Abstracts: 4 Abstracts ( 1 Oral Presentation, 2 EPosters, 1 Publication)

Treatment of Low-Blast Count AML. Maria Teresa Voso Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione Università di Roma Tor Vergata

A Phase II Study of the Combination of Oral Rigosertib and Azacitidine in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Let s Look at Our Blood

Disrupting the Cell Cycle to Treat AML and MDS Rodman & Renshaw Conference

Myelodysplastic syndromes post ASH Dominik Selleslag AZ Sint-Jan Brugge

MDS overview 전남대학교김여경

ASBMT MDS/MPN UPDATE

Understanding & Treating Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Treating Higher-Risk MDS. Case presentation. Defining higher risk MDS. IPSS WHO IPSS: WPSS MD Anderson PSS

La lenalidomide: meccanismo d azione e risultati terapeutici. F. Ferrara

Overview. Myelodysplastic Syndromes: What s on the Horizon? Molecular Mutations in MDS. Refining Risk Models. Incorporating Mutational Data

W Fiedler 1, M Heuser 2, J Chromik 3, F Thol 2, C Bokemeyer 1, S Theile 4, I Lebkuechner 4, AL Kranich 5

Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Post-ASH meeting 2014 Marie-Christiane Vekemans

New treatment strategies in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia van der Helm, Lidia Henrieke

Anti-MDS Immunity: a potential player in the response to hypomethylating agents

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Decitabine (Dacogen) for myelodysplastic syndrome. April 2008

IPSS Modified 7/27/2011. WHO-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS)

The Changing Face of MDS: Advances in Treatment

AML IN OLDER PATIENTS Whenever possible, intensive induction therapy should be considered

The Enhancement of Anti-Tumor Activities of Selinexor when Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 2 Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, South San Francisco

Background CPX-351. Lancet J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl): Abstract 7035.

N Engl J Med Volume 373(12): September 17, 2015

Combination Therapies in Higher-risk MDS

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Progress at last

Shyamala Navada, MD Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. 60th ASH Annual Meeting & Exposition 2018: San Diego, CA, USA 1

Molecular Genetic Testing to Predict Response to Therapy in MDS

New drugs in Acute Leukemia. Cristina Papayannidis, MD, PhD University of Bologna

Outline. Case Study 5/17/2010. Treating Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Tapan M. Kadia, MD Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center

Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Hematopathology. Analysis of SHIP1 as a potential biomarker of Disease Progression

Dr Kavita Raj Consultant Haematologist Guys and St Thomas Hospital

New and Emerging Strategies in the Treatment of Patients with Higher risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Refining Prognosis. Overview. Low Blood Counts. Low Blood Counts. High Risk MDS and Novel Therapy: What s on the Horizon? 3/2/2016

Two-stage study designed to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of pracinostat combined with azacitidine in patients with high and very high risk MDS

A paradigm shift in the therapy of low blast count acute myeloid leukemia. Valeria Santini UF Ematologia, Università di Firenze

Should lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients be transplanted upfront? YES Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha France

CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT

Pathogenesis and management of CMML

Current guidelines for management of INT- 2/high risk MDS

Emerging Treatment Options for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

2 nd Generation TKI Frontline Therapy in CML

Karyopharm Reports Second Quarter 2015 Financial Results and Highlights Recent Progress

Double hit lymphoma Clinical perspectives

Kevin Kelly, MD, Phd Acute Myeloid and Lymphoid Leukemias

Myeloid Differentiation Observed, Including Induction of CD38 in 85% of Evaluable Patients

Nuclear Export Inhibition: Selinexor in Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma. 10 May 2016, Bologna Italy

[ NASDAQ: MEIP ] Analyst & Investor Event December 8, 2014

Eltanexor (KPT-8602), a Second Generation Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, in Patients with Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Mantle Cell Lymphoma. A schizophrenic disease

Richter s Syndrome: Risk, Predictors and Treatment

MDS FDA-approved Drugs

esmo.org September 2014, Madrid, Spain

ADVANCES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES

Selinexor in Combina.on with Cladribine, Cytarabine and G-CSF for Relapsed or Refractory AML

Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine in Treatment-Naïve Patients Aged 65 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

ASBMT MDS/MPN Update Sunil Abhyankar, MD

Myelodysplastic syndrome. Jeanne Palmer, MD Mayo Clinic, Arizona

Selinexor: Novel Anti-Cancer Agent: Restores Tumor Suppressors & Reduces Oncoproteins

Understanding AML Casey O Connell, MD Associate Professor, Jane Anne Nohl Division of Hematology Keck School of Medicine, USC

LAM 20-30% Cristina Papayannidis, MD, PhD DIMES, Istituto di Ematologia L. e A. Seràgnoli Università di Bologna

a resource for physicians Recommended Referral Timing for Stem Cell Transplant Evaluation

Randomized phase 2 study of low-dose decitabine vs low-dose azacitidine in lower-risk MDS and MDS/MPN

NOVEL APPROACHES IN THE CLASSIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES-CLINICAL IMPLICATION

Personalized Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Patrick Stiff MD Loyola University Medical Center

Addition of Rituximab to Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide in Patients with CLL: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: State of the Art in 2018

ENASIDENIB IN MUTANT-IDH2 RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (R/R AML): RESULTS OF A PHASE 1 DOSE- ESCALATION AND EXPANSION STUDY

Highlights in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): what is going to change?

Insights into the Cell-of-Origin of the Histiocytoses Using Patient-Derived Xenograft Models

The Past, Present, and Future of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Policy Specific Section:

What you need to know about MDS. The Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Stuart Goldberg MD

Treatment of low risk MDS

Concomitant WT1 mutations predicted poor prognosis in CEBPA double-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

[ NASDAQ: MEIP ] Wedbush PacGrow Healthcare Conference August 16-17, 2016

Risk-adapted therapy of AML in younger adults. Sergio Amadori Tor Vergata University Hospital Rome

MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES: A diagnosis often missed

Characterization of TRK fusions and therapeutic response to TRK inhibition in hematologic malignancies

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What more is needed? Richard A. Larson, MD University of Chicago March 2018

Myelodysplastic Syndrome. Ryotaro Nakamura, MD Associated Professor Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

What is MDS? Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Classification & Risk Stratification

Table 1: biological tests in SMD

MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME. Vivienne Fairley Clinical Nurse Specialist Sheffield

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Azacitidine (Vidaza) for myelodysplastic syndrome. September 2007

Impact of Comorbidity on Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes in MDS

New concepts in the management of elderly patients with AML

Molecularly Targeted Therapies - Strategies of the AMLSG

About Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Novel Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Myeloma

Transcription:

Selinexor, a First-in-Class XPO1 Inhibitor, Is Efficacious and Tolerable in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Refractory to Hypomethylating Agents Justin Taylor, MD, Morgan Coleman, MPH, Kelsey Alvarez, RN, Margaret Nelsen, Janine Pichardo, Filiz Sen, MD, Stephen S. Chung, MD, Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD, Jae H. Park, MD, Eytan M. Stein, MD, Martin S. Tallman, MD, Omar Abdel-Wahab, MD and Virginia M. Klimek, MD

Selinexor is an oral, slowly-reversible, first-inclass Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) XPO1 is the main nuclear export protein in eukaryotic cells and is essential for cell homeostasis x Selinexor binds Cysteine-528 of XPO1 blocking cargo binding XPO1 inhibition induces cellcycle arrest and apoptosis

XPO1 expression Overall survival probability XPO1 over-expression is seen in MDS/AML and is associated with decreased survival 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 XPO1 low XPO1 high p= 0.01 24 48 72 96 120 144 Follow up in months cbioportal.org Li Z, et al, J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 20;31(9): 1172-81

Selinexor has broad cytotoxicity in myeloid leukemia cell lines at <0.5µM IC 50 range

High need for new therapies in patients with MDS refractory to hypomethylating agents (HMA) Standard treatment options are limited after HMA AML induction therapy (if appropriate) Allogeneic SCT (if appropriate) Supportive care Survival is short following HMA failure IPSS Int-2/High Risk: approx. 5-6 months 1 IPSS Low/Int-1 Risk: approx. 16-17 months 2,3 1. Prebet T, et al, J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(24): 3322-7 2. Prebet T, et al, Haematologica 2013;98(2): e18-e19 3. Jabbour EJ, et al, Cancer 2015;121(6): 876-82

Investigator-initiated, single-arm, Phase 2 trial of selinexor in HMA refractory MDS Primary Endpoint: ORR (CR+mCR+PR+HI) (Cheson BD, et al, Blood 2006;108: 419 425) Secondary Endpoints: Safety, Duration of Response, Survival Exploratory Objectives: Genetics, RNA Expression, Protein Levels as Biomarkers Allowable selinexor dose reductions on 3-week schedule: 40mg twice weekly for 2 weeks 80mg once weekly for 2 weeks Fatigue, nausea hyponatremia

Baseline characteristics (n=25) Trial included older patient population with high-risk MDS characteristics # Pts % Pts # Pts % Pts Median Age (years) 77 (50-86) BM BLASTS Female 4 16% < 5% 2 8% Male 21 84% 5-10% 6 24% De novo 19 76% 11-20% 13 52% Therapy-Related 6 24% 21-30% 4 16% WHO Subtype IPSS-R Cytogenetics RAEB-1 4 16% Very Good 1 4% RAEB-2 12 48% Good 4 16% AML 4 16% Intermediate 7 28% RCUD 1 4% Poor 3 12% RCMD 3 12% Very Poor 5 20% MDS/MPN 1 4% Unknown 5 20% IPSS-R Risk Group PRIOR THERAPY Very Low 0 0% MEDIAN CYCLES 13 (3-67) ( )Low 2 8% Azacitidine 14 56% ( )Intermediate 5 20% Decitabine 3 12% ( )High 7 28% Very High 11 44% Aza & DAC 6 24% HMA & Other 3 12%

Selinexor is associated with a 32% ORR (n=19 patients evaluable for efficacy*) Response duration 6.8 mo 2 ongoing responses >1 yr An additional 42% had SD *6 patients did not receive 1 complete cycle: PD/death (n=4), withdrawal (n=1), concurrent illness (n=1)

Responses and associated disease-related parameters (n=19 evaluable for response) * +HI-E *

Responses by molecular abnormalities (n=19 evaluable for response) SF3B1 mutation was significantly associated with response TP53 mutation or >3 mutations nonsignificantly enriched in non-responders

Selinexor is safe and tolerable in MDS at 60mg flat dose given twice weekly % Adverse Effect By Grade and Cycle Length (n=25) 4-week (35mg/m 2 ) 3-week (60mg flat) >10% decrease with 60mg twice weekly >10% increase with 60mg twice weekly Using patients highest grade per toxicity

Selinexor improves survival in HMA refractory MDS compared to historical cohorts # Median OS = 9.7 months Historical survival 5-6 months in high-risk pts (Prebet et al, JCO. 2011) # Clinical benefit includes patients with SD

Recent data implicate innate immune activation in the pathogenesis of MDS Barreyro L, et al, Blood 2018;132:1553-1560 Lee SCW et al, Cancer Cell 2018; 34:225-241 Abstract #937 Dec. 3 rd 4:30PM Abstract #882 Dec. 3 rd 5:45PM TNFα, MYC

Selinexor decreases NF-κB target genes and alters MYC transcription levels TNFα MYC Measured from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

XPO1 mrna levels are increased at 4 and 8 hours after selinexor administration Preclinical degradation of XPO1 with exposure to selinexor XPO1 mrna increase may be a biomarker for SINE target effect *XPO1 protein levels in pt samples ongoing

Conclusions Primary efficacy endpoint was reached with ORR = 32% 60mg flat dose given twice weekly for 3 weeks was tolerable and PD markers suggest sufficient for target engagement Median overall survival was 9.7 months compared to historical control of 5-6 months SF3B1 mutation significantly associated with response

Acknowledgements MSKCC Morgan Coleman Margaret Nelsen Kelsey Alvarez, RN Filiz Sen, MD- Pathology Omar Abdel-Wahab lab Virginia Klimek, MD Leukemia Service NYP-Columbia Gary Schwartz lab Karyopharm Therapeutics MSKCC patients and their families