PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Similar documents
PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Different follicle stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone ratios for ovarian stimulation

Bioequivalence of subcutaneous injections of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon ) by Pen-injector and syringe

Clinical profiling of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rfsh; Puregon): relationship between serum FSH and efficacy

Progesterone and clinical outcomes

Lars G.Westergaard 1, Karin Erb, Steen Laursen, Per E.Rasmussen and Sven Rex

Article Luteal hormonal profile of oocyte donors stimulated with a GnRH antagonist compared with natural cycles

in vitro fertilization

IVF (,, ) : (HP-hMG) - (IVF- ET) : GnRH, HP-hMG (HP-hMG )57, (rfsh )140, (Gn)

Relevance of LH activity supplementation

A Tale of Three Hormones: hcg, Progesterone and AMH

EHY Ng, WSB Yeung, PC Ho. Introduction

Orgalutran 0.25 mg/0.5 ml solution for injection 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION

CY Tse, AMK Chow, SCS Chan. Introduction

STIMULATION AND OVULATION TRIGGERING

Clinical Study Clinical Effects of a Natural Extract of Urinary Human Menopausal Gonadotrophin in Normogonadotropic Infertile Patients

A Tale of Three Hormones: hcg, Progesterone and AMH

Luteal phase rescue after GnRHa triggering Progesterone and Estradiol

Asimina Tavaniotou 1, Carola Albano 1, Johan Smitz 1 and Paul Devroey 1,2

' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' COMPARISON BETWEEN HIGHLY PURIFIED--FSH AND HMG FOR SUPEROVULATION IN WOMEN UNDERGOING IN VITRO FERTILIZATION ORIGINAL RESEARCH

I. ART PROCEDURES. A. In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

Does previous response to clomifene citrate influence the selection of gonadotropin dosage given in subsequent superovulation treatment cycles?


Clinical consequences of ovarian stimulation in assisted conception and in PCOS Al-Inany, H.G.

Effects of HCG and LH on ovarian stimulation. Are they bioequivalent?

Endocrinology of the Female Reproductive Axis

Agonist versus antagonist in ICSI cycles: a randomized trial and cost effectiveness analysis Badrawi A, Zaki S, Al-Inany H, Ramzy A M, Hussein M

Can cycle day 7 FSH concentration during controlled ovarian stimulation be used to guide FSH dosing for in vitro fertilization?

Does triggering ovulation by 5000 IU of uhcg affect ICSI outcome? *

REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY

Lars G. Westergaard, M.D., D.M.Sc., Karin Erb, M.S., Steen B. Laursen, Ph.D., Sven Rex, M.D., and Per E. Rasmussen, M.D.

A Case of Pregnancy Using Recombinant Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist

Ovarian response in three consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles

Timur Giirgan, M.D.* Bulent Urman, M.D. Hakan Yarali, M.D. Hakan E. Duran, M.D.

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 25 June 2008

The cost-effectiveness of IVF in the UK: a comparison of three gonadotrophin treatments Sykes D, Out H J, Palmer S J, van Loon J

The importance of human chorionic gonadotropin support of the corpus luteum during human gonadotropin therapy in women with anovulatory infertility

Rafael A. Cabrera, M.D., Laurel Stadtmauer, M.D., Ph.D., Jacob F. Mayer, Ph.D., William E. Gibbons, M.D., and Sergio Oehninger, M.D., Ph.D.

HCG mode of action versus GnRHa action for triggering of final oocyte maturation

Comparison of follitropin-b administered by a pen device with conventional syringe in an ART programme a retrospective study

Infertility: failure to conceive within one year of unprotected regular sexual intercourse. Primary secondary

Reproductive FSH. Analyte Information

Fixed Schedule for in vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer: Comparison of Outcome between the Short and the Long Protocol

10.7 The Reproductive Hormones

Comparison of serum and follicular fluid hormone levels with recombinant and urinary human chorionic gonadotropin during in vitro fertilization

PRODUCT INFORMATION. Pharmacotherapeutic group: anti-gonadotrophin releasing hormone; ATC code: H01CC01.

08036-Barcelona, Spain. Fax: ;

Pulsatile gonadotrophin releasing hormone versus gonadotrophin treatment of hypothalamic hypogonadism in males

Developments in human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone technology: are we going in the right direction?

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

Pituitary down-regulation in IVF/ICSI: consequences for treatment regimens Mochtar, M.H.

Original Article Impact of estrogen-to-oocyte ratio on live birth rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

Menstruation-free interval and ongoing pregnancy in IVF using GnRH antagonists

Herjan Coelingh Bennink, M.D.:j: Andre Van Steirteghem, M.D., Ph.D.* Paul Devroey, M.D., Ph.D.*

(1.,, ) (2.,,, )

Cigna Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy

Advanced age, poor responders and the role of LH supplementation. C. Alviggi University Federico II, Naples, Italy

Summary

Addressing Endometriosis with Your Patients: Combining Individualized Treatment Options with Patient-Clinician Dialogue

Superovulation of Beef Heifers with Follicle Stimulating Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotropin: Acute Effects on Hormone Secretion

Ivf day 6 estradiol level

Superovulation of Beef Heifers with Follicle Stimulating Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotropin: Acute Effects on Hormone Secretion

Reproductive Health and Pituitary Disease

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist reduces the miscarriage rate for pregnancies achieved in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome

The emergence of Personalized Medicine protocols for IVF.

Common protocols in intra-uterine insemination cycles

Endometrial Preparation for Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Zitao Liu, MD, PhD New Hope Fertility Center, NY

Article Effect of cetrorelix dose on premature LH surge during ovarian stimulation

The effect of adding oral oestradiol to progesterone as luteal phase support in ART cycles a randomized controlled study

Utility of color Doppler indices of dominant follicular

The serum estradiol/oocyte ratio in patients with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins

First you must understand what is needed for becoming pregnant?

The ganirelix dose-finding study group*

Principles of Ovarian Stimulation

Female Reproductive Physiology. Dr Raelia Lew CREI, FRANZCOG, PhD, MMed, MBBS Fertility Specialist, Melbourne IVF

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

I.E.Messinis 1,4, S.Milingos 1, K.Zikopoulos 2, G.Hasiotis 3, K.Seferiadis 3 and D.Lolis 2

Jinan Bekir, M.D. Amma Kyei-Mensah, M.D. Seang-Lin Tan, M.D.

LH activity administration during the

Treatment of Poor Responders

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Institute of Medical Research, Chang Jung University, Changhua 500, Taiwan

NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET

AUSTRALIAN PRODUCT INFORMATION ORGALUTRAN (ganirelix acetate) Solution for Injection

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

No association between endogenous LH and pregnancy in a GnRH antagonist protocol: part II, recombinant FSH

Factors influencing serum progesterone level on triggering day in stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles

LOW RESPONDERS. Poor Ovarian Response, Por

Draft Agreed by Biosimilar Working Party (BMWP) October Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation 17 November 2011

Article Depot GnRH agonist versus the single dose GnRH antagonist regimen (cetrorelix, 3 mg) in patients undergoing assisted reproduction treatment

Does ovulation triggering influence the risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?

N.A.Bersinger 1, A.Brandenberger, E.Berger, C.K.Baumann and M.H.Birkhäuser

A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Profiles of Leuprorelin 3 Month Depot for the Treatment of Pelvic Endometriosis

Link between effectiveness and cost data The costing was undertaken prospectively on the same patient sample that provided the effectiveness data.

Is it the seed or the soil? Arthur Leader, MD, FRCSC

Transcription:

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/24875 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2017-12-05 and may be subject to change.

Int J Fértil 40 (6), 1995 p. 307-310 1995 U.S. International Foundation for Studies in Reproduction, Inc., the Falloppius International Society, the International Society of Reproductive Medicine, the World Foundation for Medical Studies in Female Health and the Center for the Study of Cryopreservation of Oocytes and Spermatozoa Serum Levels of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone After Subcutaneous Administration of Human Menopausal Gonadotropin During Pituitary Suppression Ingrid J.M. Duijkers, M.D. Yvonne M.M. Magnusson, M.D. Hans M.G. Hollanders, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Nijmegen St. Radboud Nijmegen, The Netherlands ABSTRACT: Objective- -The present study investigated the pharmacokinetics of a single subcutaneous dose of human menopausal gonadotropin (hmg) on serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations. Subjects and Methods Six healthy female volunteers, aged 20-40 years, with regular menstrual cycles and normal endocrine profiles, who were not receiving any hormonal medication, were treated with the gonadotropin-releasing-hormone agonist buserelin to suppress endogenous gonadotropin release. One volunteer dropped out during treatment. When the serum estradiol concentration had fallen to below 500 pmol/l, an injection of 150 IU hmg (HumegonR) was given subcutaneously. Immediately before injection and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, 24, 48 and 96 hours after, blood samples were drawn for determination of FSH and LH concentrations. Results The baseline FSH level was 2.8 IU/L, and peak concentration (6.8 IU/L) was reached 12 hours after hmg injection (median values). Exogenous LH could not be measured because of the presence of endogenous LH. Discussion The pattern of serum FSH concentrations after a single injection of hmg was found to resemble that seen after intramuscular hmg administration, although the peak FSH value was reached somewhat later. Int J Fertil 40(6):307-310, 1995 KEY WORDS: human menopausal gonadotropins (hmg), subcutaneous administration, pharmacokinetics, FSH, LH, ovarian stimulation, recombinant hmg INTRODUCTION ONADOTROPIN PREPARATIONS, SUCH as human menopausal gonadotropin (hmg), are usually administered via the intramuscular (i.m.) route. The recent development of gonadotropin preparations of high purity, especially recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), makes possible subcutaneous (s.c.) administration. Compared with i.m. administration, s.c. injections are less painful, and self-administration by the patient is more feasible. The most appropriate dosage interval for s.c. administration is not known, since information is sparse regarding the pharmacokinetics of exogenous FSH and luteinizing hormone (LH) after s.c. gonadotropin injection. We therefore decided to study the effect of a single s.c. hmg injection on Int J Fertil 40 307

308 J. Duijkers FSH (IU/L) LH (IU/L) hours hours FIG. 1. Median serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations and 10th and 90th percentiles after a single subcutaneous injection of 150 IU human menopausal gonadotropin during pituitaiy suppression by buserelin, in five female volunteers. FIG. 2. Median serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations and 10th and 90th percentiles after a single subcutaneous injection of 150 IU hum an m enopausal gonadotropin during pituitary suppression by buserelin, in five female volunteers. serum FSH and LH concentrations in female volunteers. Since the presence of high levels of endogenous FSH and LH complicates interpretation of the results, pituitary function was suppressed by administering the gonadotropin-releasing-hormone (GnRH) agonist buserelin. onwards. On day 10 of the buserelin treatment, the serum 17(3-estradiol concentration was determined and then measured every three or four days until it was below 500 pmol/l, One volunteer dropped out during the buserelin treatment because of sinusitis and nasal bleeding. As soon as the estradiol concentration was found to be below 500 pmol/l, a single subcutaneous injection of 150 IU HumegonR(NV MATERIALS AND METHODS Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) was given the next Six female volunteers participated in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age 20-40 years, a regular menstrual cycle (between 24 and 35 days), a normal endocrine serum profile in the early follicular phase of the cycle (FSH concentration below 8 IU/L, LH/FSH ratio less than 3, testosterone concentration below 2.5 nmol/l, prolactin concentration below 750 mlu/l, and thyroxine concentration between 58 and 148 nmol/l) and no intake of hormonal medication, including oral contraceptives, for at least 3 months prior to the study. The median age of the five volunteers who completed the study was 29 years (range 29-38 years) and the median body mass index was 20.4 kg/m2(18.4-27.3 lcg/m1). All the women were treated with the GnRH-agonist buserelin (SuprefactRnasal spray, Hoechst A.G., Frankfurt, Germany) at a dose of 300 pg three times a day, from day 21 of the previous menstrual cycle day at 8 a.m. and the buserelin treatment was continued. Two ampules of Humegon were diluted in 0.5 ml solvent and injected subcutaneously in the abdomen using a syringe injector (MonojectR, Sherwood Medical, St. Louis, USA). Each ampule contains 75 IU FSH and 75 IU LH activity, as determined by in vivo bioassays. Due to inherent inaccuracy of bioassays, results of determinations are within 80-125% of stated activity. One batch of Humegon was used for the study. Blood samples were collected, either by venipuncture or via an intravenous cannula, immediately before injection and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, 24, 48 and 96 hours after. Buserelin administration was stopped after the last blood samples were taken. The samples were centrifuged within three hours after collection and serum was frozen at -20 C until assayed. The serum estradiol concentration on the tenth Int J Fertil 40

FSH and lh After Subcutaneous hmg 309 and gradually decreasing thereafter. In a previous study of similar design, the effect of a single i.m. or i.v. injection of 150 IU hmg on serum FSH and LH levels was described [3], The increase in serum FSH levels after i.m. injection of hmg showed a substantially similar pattern to that following s.c. injection, although the peak concentration seemed to occur day of buserelin treatment was determined by a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (DelfiaR, Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland). The limit of 500 pmol/l was chosen because of the low sensitivity of the assay in the range from 150 to 500 pmol/l. The estradiol concentration immediately before the hmg injection was measured retrospectively by a more sensitive radioim m unoassay [1]. FSH and LH somewhat earlier (8 hours after i.m. injection as concentrations were determined in all serum samples by immunoradiometric assays (IRMAs), as previously described [2]. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. against 12 hours after s.c injection). In a study by Le Cotonnec et al [4], serum FSH concentrations were determined in male subjects after single i.m. and s.c. injections of 150 IU highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin HPR). These investigators found similar patterns of FSH concentrations after s.c. and i.m. administration, with maximum RESULTS concentrations occurring 13 and 18 hours after i.m. and s.c. injection, respectively. In a study by Saal et The median estradiol concentration immediately before the hmg injection, as measured by radioimmunoassay, was 88 pmol/l (range <75-390 pmol/l). The median values of the FSH and LH concentrations and the 10th and 90th percentiles, before and after HumegonRinjection, are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The median FSH concentration before injection was 2.8 (10th percentile (pio) 1.4 IU/L; 90th percentile (p9o) 4.9 IU/L). Median FSH concentrations started to increase within the first half-hour after injection and reached a maximum value of 6.8 IU/L (pio 4.7 IU/L; p90 7.0 IU/L) after 12 hours (pio 10 hours; p 90 12 hours), the increase being statistically significant (P <.05). Serum LH concentrations remained at a low level throughout the study. A small increase in median LH concentrations was seen in the first two hours after the Humegon injection, but there was great interindividual variation and the increase was not statistically significant. The subcutaneous injections were well tolerated. Two patients experienced transient pain at the injection site, starting 7 and 10 hours after injection, respectively, and lasting for a few hours. In one of these two patients the injection site showed redness without swelling (diameter of red area 1 to 2 cm). The symptoms were not severe in either case. al [5], pharmacokinetic parameters were described after single s.c. and i.m. injections of human chorionic gonadotropin (hcg) in male subjects. Serum hcg concentrations reached a peak value 6 and 16 hours after i.m. and s.c. injection, respectively, the half-lives being 31 ± 3 and 38 ± 3 hours. The authors concluded that diffusion of hcg into the circulation was slower after s.c. administration. These investigations differed from ours as regards the groups studied (male instead of female subjects) and the preparations administered (highly purified FSH and hcg instead of hmg). Nevertheless, serum concentrations showed a slightly slower and more prolonged increase after s.c. administration than after i.m. administration in all studies. Serum LH concentrations were insufficiently suppressed to enable measurement of exogenous LH. There was great interindividual variation in the serum LH profiles and no clear pattern could be seen. In the present study, a single s.c. hmg injection was well tolerated by all subjects. Repeated s.c. injections with hmg might induce local skin reactions, such as swelling, redness or induration, since the urine-derived hmg preparations are of low purity and contain a large number of non-gonadotropin proteins [6]. However, a recombinant human FSH preparation of very high purity has been developed recently [7]. In contrast to hmg, recombinant DISCUSSION human FSH should be very suitable for daily s.c. administration. Subcutaneous administration of 150 IU hmg leads to an increase in serum FSH concentrations, reaching a peak approximately 12 hours after injection Since the FSH profile after s.c. injection showed that serum concentrations remained adequate over a period of 24 hours, subcutaneous gonadotropin Int f Fértil 40

310 J. Duijkers injections can presumably be given once daily. This assumption is supported by the findings of Howies et al [8], who treated in vitro fertilization patients with a highly purified urinary FSH preparation which was administered once daily subcutaneously. This treatment schedule was found to be effective in stimulating multiple follicular development. The injections were also well tolerated. A pharmacokinetic study now needs to be carried out to measure serum FSH concentrations after repeated s.c. gonadotropin injections. It may be concluded from the results of the present study that once-daily subcutaneous administration of gonadotropins induces adequate serum concentrations of FSH and LH. 2. Kremer JAM, Borm G, Schellekens LA; et al: Pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone and prolactin in lactating and nonlactating women and the response to naltrexone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:294-300, 1991. 3. Duijkers IJM, Hollanders JMG, Willemsen WNP, et al: Patterns of serum FSH, LH and hcg after i.m. or i.v. administration of hmg during pituitary suppression. IntJ Fertil 40:86-91, 1995. 4. Le Cotonnec J-Y, Porchet HC, Beltrami V, et al: Comparative pharmacokinetics of two urinary human follicle stim ulating hormone preparations in healthy female and male volunteers. Hum Reprod 8:1604-1611, 1993. 5. Saal W, Glowania H-J, Hengst W, et al: Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics after subcutaneous and intram uscular injection of hum an chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 56:225-229, 1991. 6. Giudice E, Crisci C, Eshkol A, et al: Composition of commercial gonadotrophin preparations extracted from ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors7 thanks are due to the staff of the Endocrinology and Reproduction Laboratory, who performed the hormone assays, and to Prof. Dr Hans M. Vemer and Dr Bjorn Oddens (International Health Foundation, Geneva/Brussels) for their critical reading of the manuscript. human post-menopausal urine: characterization of non-gonadotrophin proteins. Hum Reprod 9:2291-2299, 1994. 7. Mannaerts B, De Leeuw R, Geelen}, et al: Comparative in vitro and in vivo studies on the biological characteristics of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocrinology 129:2623-2630, 1991. 8. Howies CM, Loumaye E, Giroud D, et al: Multiple follicular development and ovarian steroidogenesis following subcutaneous adm inistration of a highly REFERENCES 1. Thomas CMG, Corbey RS, Rolland R: Assessment of unconjugated oestradiol and progesterone serum levels throughout pregnancy in normal wom en and in women with hyperprolactinaemia who conceived after bromocryptin treatment. Acta Endocrinol (Kbh) 86:405-414, 1977. purified urinary FSH preparation in pituitary desensitized women undergoing IVF: a multicentre European phase III study. Hum Reprod 9:424-430, 1994. Address reprint requests to: Ingrid J.M. Duijkers, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Nijmegen St. Radboud P.O. Box 9101 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands Int J Fertil 40