Demographic parameters and biotic factors of two Dacini species, Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus, on Réunion Island

Similar documents
Bionomics of Fruit Fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on Cucumber under Laboratory Condition

whereas the fourth inhibitor was extracted and semi purified from cabbage (Brassica oleracae) in the Insect Physiology Laboratory of the Department of

FRUIT FLY OF CUCURBITS IN SEMI ARID REGION OF NORTH GUJARAT CHAUDHARY, F. K. *

Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Genetic Sexing: All-male Sterile Fly Releases in Hawaii

Population Density and Biological Studies of Two Cucucrbit Flies Species :Dacus ciliates Loew and Dacus frontalis Beecker (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 12 Article 32

VQ612 Determination of Fruit Fly Host Status for Red Tiger, Shadow, Gemini & Baby-lee Watermelons. MD Jess, RJ Corcoran QDPI

Rearing Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Assessing the Application of the Jackknife and Bootstrap. Techniques to the Estimation of the Variability of the Net

Survival and development of Bactrocera oleae Gmelin (Diptera:Tephritidae) immature stages at four temperatures in the laboratory

VAPOUR HEAT TREATMENT AGAINST THREE SPECIES OF FRUIT FLIES IN MANGO DEDONG

The intestinal microbiota of tephritid fruit flies as a potential tool to improve rearing and the SIT

Effect of Natural and Artificial Diets on the Life History Parameters of Melon Fruit Fly Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)

Sperm Precedence of Irradiated Mediterranean Fruit Fly Males (Diptera: Tephritidae)

[fll ~ft:

Curre nt Status of the Solanaceous Fruit Fly Control Project in Yonaguni Island. Abstract

ACTION PLAN. for. CUELURE ATTRACTED FRUIT FLIES including the Melon Fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)

Collaborators: Gration Rwegasira, Marc De Meyer, Massimiliano Virgilio and Richard Drew

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTION OF PEACH FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA ZONATA (SAUND.)(DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)

REGIONAL STANDARDS FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES GUIDELINES FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF NON-HOST STATUS OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES TO TEPHRITID FRUIT FLIES

Ecology and Sustainable Management of Major Bactrocera Fruit Flies in Goa, India

Gamma Irradiation Effects on Reproductive Potential and Egg-Viability of the Housefly Musca domestica

Fruit fly management practices on tropical fruit in Africa

The Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Central America

PT 21: Vapour heat treatment for Bactrocera melanotus and Bactrocera xanthodes on Carica papaya

and productivity of Tribolium castaneum on resistant starches

Optional Test: Calculations of PMI using ADH

BIONOMICS OF BACTROCERA DORSALIS (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) AN IMPORTANT PEST OF MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA) IN JAMMU (J & K) J. S. Tara and Madhvi Gupta*

Erythritol ingestion impairs adult reproduction and causes larval mortality in Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

Volume 1 Issue 2 April-June,2012 DOSE OF CUE- LURE FOR SUPPRESSION OF MELON FLY POPULATION IN PUMPKIN CHAUDHARY*, F. K. AND PATEL, G. M.

BIOLOGY OF GALL FLY, Procontarina matteiana (Kieffer & Cecconi) ON MANGO *JADHAV, K. M., PATEL, R. K. AND PATEL S. A.

Population Dynamics of Three Species of Genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in BARI, Chakwal (Punjab)

Influence of Adding Borax and Modifying ph on Effectiveness of Food Attractants for Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

PERFORMANCE OF STERILIZED ELDANA SACCHARINA WALKER (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) IN MATING TRIALS

Biology of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Cucumber

Study some biological aspects of peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae) In laboratory and field

Biology and life table of the predatory mite Euseius aizawai (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Life-cycle Parameters of Aphelenchus avenae. on Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum

Does Male Sexual Experience Influence Female Mate Choice and Reproduction in the Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)?

EFFICACY OF PROTEIN BAIT SPRAYS IN CONTROLLING FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) INFESTING ANGLED LUFFA AND BITTER GOURD IN THAILAND

PILOT APPLICATION OF STERILE INSECT TECHNIQUE FOR THE ORIENTAL FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA PHJLIPPJNENSIS, IN NAOWAY ISLET

Materials and Methods

Larval growth and foraging behavior of Aedes albopictus and Aedes japonicus. Deborah O Donnell Ph.D. Candidate Georgetown University VMCA 2/7/07

Comparative Toxicity of Certain Pesticides to Peach Fruit Fly, Bactrocera zonata Saunders (Diptera: Tephritidae) under Laboratory Conditions

Efficacy of Protein Bait Sprays in Controlling Melon Fruit Fly [Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)] in Vegetable Agro-ecosystems

DIVERSITY AND HOST PREFERENCE OF TEPHRITID FRUIT FLY SPECIES INFESTING CUCURBIT AND MAJOR HORTICULTURAL CROPS GROWN IN THE LOWER COASTAL KENYA

The Changing Face of Agriculture: fruit flies, innovation and global trade

Biosafety, regulatory aspects and performance assessment of transgenic OX513A strain of Aedes aegypti L. in India

Chrysantus M. Tanga 1, Aruna Manrakhan 2, John-Henry Daneel 2, Samira A. Mohamed 1, Khamis Fathiya 1, Sunday Ekesi 1

SEASONAL BIONOMICS OF MELON FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE COQUILLETT ON BOTTLE GOURD IN LABORATORY CONDITION

Growth Rate Studies of Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella in Different Geographical Regions of North India

All male strains and chemical stimulants: Two ways to boost sterile males in SIT programs. Abstract

XA IRRADIATION AS A QUARANTINE TREATMENT OF CUT FLOWERS, GINGER AND TURMERIC AGAINST MITES, THRIPS AND NEMATODES

Fruits are grown on 0.64 million hectares in

(Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a Larval. (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Eco-friendly modules for management of fruit fly, B. cucurbitae infesting sponge gourd

Area-wide Integrated Management of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Pest in Vegetables Cultivation

Ernest J. Harris, a Roger I. Vargas, b and Eric B. Jang b. Received 18 September 2003; accepted 13 January 2004

VG323 Fruit fly disinfestation of cucurbits and capsicums with insecticides for New Zealand. Robert Corcoran QLD Department of Primary Industries

BIOLOGICAL STUDIES OON THE TRUE SPIDER, ARTEMA ATLANTA WALCKENAER,

DOI: /BER SHORT COMMUNICATION

Reproductive Biology of Fopius vandenboschi (Fullaway) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in the Laboratory

Diachasmimorpha longicaudata and D. kraussii (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), potential parasitoids of the olive fruit fly

Full-text Available Online at

Review of Long-Term Containment Strategy for Exotic Fruit Flies in Torres Strait. Andrew Tomkins Chair

Mediterranean fruit fly

Olive Fly (Bactrocera Oleae Gmelin) MANAGEMENT WITH NEW ALLOWED FORMULATIONS, SATISFYING THE OLIVE OIL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MONITORING IN LEPIDOPTERAN COTTON PESTS

PT 17: Cold treatment for Bactrocera tryoni on Citrus reticulata x C. sinensis

INFLUENCE OF HUMIDITY AND TRIBOLIUM BEETLE FOOD SOUCE ON THE LIFE HISTORY CHARACTERISTICS OF PREDATOR, XYLOCORIS FLAVIPES (HEMIPTERA: ANTHOCORIDAE)

EFFICACY OF SOME BOTANICALS AS INSECTICIDES ON THE MELON FLY, BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE (COQUILLETT) (DIPTERA : TEPHRITIDAE)

Evaluation of modified waste brewer s yeast as a protein source for the control of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)

Some biological characteristics of the Batrachedra amydraula

Effect of temperature and food on the biology of Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts

Fruit Fly Surveillance in Nepal

IMAN, I.A. EL-SEBAEY AND HOURIA A. ABD EL-WAHAB. (Manuscript received 25 November 2009 ) Abstract

Polytene Chromosomes in Salivary Gland of Second Instar Larvae of the Melon Fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillette) (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Effectiveness of Three Insecticides to Control Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) on the Cucumber Crop at Praslin, Seychelles

VG408 Quantitative evaluation of the systems used to meet New Zealand import requirements for cucurbit crops

Tree Fruit IPM Advisory: June 20 th, 2006

Mass-rearing of Mediterranean fruit fly using low-cost yeast products produced in Brazil

Before we start. Field cage tests. Field cage tests

GENETIC AND EPIGENETIC VARIATION IN DROSOPHILA LARVAE SUITABILITY TO A HYMENOPTEROUS ENDOPARASITOID

A transgenic male-only strain of the New World screwworm for an improved control program using the sterile insect technique

Bactrocera dorsalis : Current status JH VENTER NPPOZA MAY 2017

Evolutionarily stable strategies in competition for resource intake rate maximization

Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018; 6(2): Sahadat Hossain and M Khalequzzaman

Effect of weather parameters on incidence of insect pests of cucumber in eastern Bihar

Entomopathogenic fungi as a biological control for the Greater melon fly Dacus frontalis (Becker) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Esam Omar Elghadi

The Threat of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly1 to American Agriculture and Efforts Being Made to Counter This Threat2 3

Disinfestation treatments for additional varieties of tomatoes for New Zealand using dimethoate

SEASONAL VARIATIONS OF MELON FLY, Bactrocera cucurbitae (COQUILLETT) (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) IN DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL HABITATS OF BANGLADESH

PT 31: Vapour heat treatment for Bactrocera tryoni on Mangifera indica

Scientific Note. Solanum torvum (Solanaceae), a New Host of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii

Case Study: As the Worm Turns Speciation and the Apple Fly Maggot Introduction: Task: Final Product:

Genetic Control Tactic Against Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Insect to Escape Destruction of Perishable Horticulture Crops

ISPM No. 30 ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) (2008)

Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir , INDIA 2

NAPPO Regional Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (RSPM)

MANAGEMENT OF FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERACUCURBITAE (COQUILLETT) IN RIDGE GOURD THROUGH BOTANICALS AND NEWER INSECTICIDES

Transcription:

Proceedings of 6th International Fruit Fly Symposium 6 10 May 2002, Stellenbosch, South Africa pp. 91 95 Demographic parameters and biotic factors of two Dacini species, Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus, on Réunion Island Jean-François Vayssières*, Yannick Carel & Mathieu Coubes Laboratoire d Entomologie de Kourou CIRAD-FLHOR, B.P. 701-97387, Kourou, Cedex, France Réunion Island is characterized by a particular orography and a variable distribution of host plants for Dacini species. A complex of 3 Dacini species infests 16 host plant species belonging to the family Cucurbitaceae. These three species of vegetable fruit flies represent the primary pests of this plant family and are the main insect problem for cucurbit crops. We included in this study the two species B. cucurbitae (melon fly) and D. ciliatus (Ethiopian fruit fly). Adults of B. cucurbitae are classified as R-strategists, spending more energy than D. ciliatus in effectively using environmental resources. Adults of D. ciliatus can be classified as K-strategists. B. cucurbitae is the species best adapted to exploit short-lived host plants. This adaptation explains its predominance over D. ciliatus under larval interspecific competition on Réunion Island. INTRODUCTION Réunion Island is characterized by a particularly diverse topography and variable distribution of host-plants for Dacini fruit fly species. A complex of three Dacini species infests 16 host plant species belonging to the Cucurbitaceae family. These represent the primary pests of this plant family and are the main insect problem for cucurbit crops. The present study focuses on two species, Bactrocera cucurbitae (melon fly) and Dacus ciliatus (Ethiopian fruit fly), both of which were introduced to Réunion Island and have different bio-ecological characteristics. The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare the main demographic parameters of two Dacini species living on Réunion island; 2) to compare the main biotic factors of these two Dacini species. MATERIALS AND METHODS Rearings of adults (wild strains). For both species, 30 male female pairs were randomly isolated in 30 individual cages 10 pairs were isolated on each of three cucurbits, squash (Cucurbita pepo), pumpkin (C. pepo), and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) at 25 ± 1 C and 75 ± 10% relative humidity. Adults were fed with protein hydrolysate and sugar. Adults could also feed on three slices of cucurbit laid on the wire mesh top of the cage. Females could also oviposit within these three slices. Rearing of larval instars. Eggs were collected, placed in Petri dishes in cohorts of 100 eggs, and then observed until eclosion. Four different incubator temperatures, 15 ± 0.2 C, 20 ± 0.5 C, 25 ± 1 C and 30 ± 1 C, were used for larval rearing in Petri dishes. Nine Petri dishes of each species and for each temperature were observed. *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jean-francois.vayssieres@cirad.fr Statistical analysis was performed using the life test procedure (SAS 1997) for life span, with variance analysis, followed by the Newmann-Keuls test, P = 0.05, for the other parameters. [The life test procedure gives the point estimate (in days) of the survival distribution of each quantile (e.g. 50% of surviving flies) for each Dacini species with 95% confidence interval (lower, upper) for each host-species.] RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Pre-oviposition period Table 1 shows that the mean pre-ovipositional period was 10.9 days for B. cucurbitae and 11.2 for D. ciliatus (Table 2) at 25 C. No significant differences were observed for the pre-oviposition period (in days) between the two fruit fly species and the three host-plants. Oviposition period Table 1 shows that the mean oviposition period was 112.4 days for B. cucurbitae and 82.9 days for D. ciliatus (Table 2) at 25 C. Significant differences were observed between the two fruit fly species and between squash and cucumberpumpkin for melon fly. Life span For B. cucurbitae, 50% of the flies were still alive after five months on cucumber and 60% after six months on pumpkin at 25 C. For D. ciliatus, 50% of the flies were still alive after four months on pumpkin, and 50% after 105 days on squash at 25 C. Gross fecundity Table 3 shows that gross fecundity was significantly different for B. cucurbitae between the three

92 Proceedings of the 6th International Fruit Fly Symposium Table 1. Oviposition period and life span (in days) of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae, at 25 C in three host plants. Pre-oviposition Oviposition Life span Cucumber 10.0 a 121.8 a 143 a Pumpkin 12.0 a 133.1 a 211 b Squash 10.6 a 82.2 b 142 a Table 2. Oviposition period and life span (in days) of the Ethiopian fruit fly, Dacus ciliatus, at 25 C in three host plants. Pre-oviposition Oviposition Life span Cucumber 9.8 a 84.0 b 110 a Pumpkin 12.5 a 85.2 b 107 a Squash 11.2 a 79.4 b 116 a host-plants, with 1111 eggs for cucumber compared with 521 for pumpkin and 343 for squash at 25 C. The gross fecundity is the measure of the number of eggs a hypothetical cohort of females would lay if all lived to the last possible age. The net fecundity is the actual number of eggs laid by females observed in this study over their life. Table 4 shows that gross fecundity was also significantly different for D. ciliatus between the three host-plants, with 375 eggs for cucumber compared with 423 for pumpkin and 571 for squash at 25 C. Gross daily fecundity Table 3 shows that gross daily fecundity by host-plant is significantly different for B. cucurbitae: 8.6 eggs per day for cucumber versus 3.8 for pumpkin and 4.3 for squash at 25 C. Table 4 shows that gross daily fecundity by host-plant for D.ciliatus is also significantly different, Table 3. Fecundity, fertility and egg hatching success of Bactrocera cucurbitae at 25 C in three host plants. Number of eggs Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net Gross hatch fecundity fecundity fecundity/day fecundity/day fertility/day fertility/day (%) Cucumber 1111 a 1015 a 8.6 a 8.1 a 7.4 a 6.7 a 91 Pumpkin 521 b 435 b 3.8 b 3.6 b 3.0 b 2.5 b 83 Squash 343 c 313 c 4.3 b 4.2 b 3.8 b 3.5 b 91 Table 4. Fecundity, fertility and egg hatching success of Dacus ciliatus at 25 C in three hosts-plants. Number of eggs Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net Gross hatch fecundity fecundity fecundity/day fecundity/day fertility/day fertility/day (%) Cucumber 375 c 333 b 2.7 c 2.3 c 2.2 c 1.9 b 89 Pumpkin 423 b 357 b 3.5 b 3.1 b 2.8 b 2.3 b 84 Squash 571 a 533 a 6.6 a 6.1 a 5.8 a 5.4 a 93

Table 5. Egg incubation period and developmental rate of larval instars of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus at 30 C in three host plants. L1 = first larval instar; L2 = second larval instar; L3 = third larval instar. Cucumber B. cucurbitae 23.67 ± 0.58 a 8±1a 12.33 ± 0.58 a 65 ± 7.00 a 8.67 ± 0.58 a 317 ± 23.01 13.2 ± 0.96 a D. ciliatus 30.67 ± 1.15 b 15.67 ± 0.58 b 14.67 ± 8.14 a 92 ± 17.78 b 10 ± 0.58 b 385 ± 41.5 16 ± 1.73 b Pumpkin B. cucurbitae 24.33 ± 0.58 a 7.67 ± 1.15 a 14±1a 84±3.46 a 9±0a 346±6.20 14.4 ± 0.26 a D. ciliatus 31.67 ± 0.58 b 15 ± 1.73 b 14.33 ±1.53 a 86 ± 14 a 11±0b 407±17.8 17 ± 0.74 b Squash B. cucurbitae 23.67 ± 0.58 a 10±0a 12.33 ± 1.15 a 65 ± 7.21 a 9.00±0a 327±8.94 13.6 ± 0.37 a D. ciliatus 29.67 ± 0.58 b 15.67 ± 2.08 b 14.33 ± 8.50 a 81.33 ± 7.77 b 10±1b 381±42.9 15.9 ± 1.79 b Table 6. Egg incubation period and developmental rate of larval instars of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus at 25 C in three host plants. L1 = first larval instar; L2 = second larval instar; L3 = third larval instar. Cucumber B. cucurbitae 30±1a 23.33 ± 0.58 a 24±0a 64.67 ± 12.70 a 11.33 ± 0.58 a 414 ± 28.1 17.2 ± 1.17 a D. ciliatus 40.33 ± 0.58 b 23.33 ± 0.58 a 24±0b 71.33 ± 1.15 a 14 ± 0.58 b 503 ± 16.2 21 ± 0.67 b Pumpkin B. cucurbitae 30.67 ± 1.53 a 19 ± 3.61 a 24±0a 64.67 ± 12.70 a 12.67 ± 0.58 a 442 ± 31.7 18.4 ± 1.32 a D. ciliatus 41.67 ± 1.53 b 23.67 ± 2.08 a 24.33 ± 0.58 a 79 ± 9.64 a 15.67 ± 0.58 b 545 ± 27.7 22.7 ± 1.15 b Squash B. cucurbitae 31±0a 18.33 ± 2.31 a 22.67 ± 2.31 a 72±0a 11±0a 408±4.62 a 17 ± 0.19 a D. ciliatus 43±1b 22.67 ± 1.15 b 24.67 ± 1.15 b 71.33 ± 1.15 b 14.33 ± 0.58 b 506 ± 18.3 21 ± 0.76 b Table 7. Egg incubation period and developmental rate of larval instars of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus at 20 C in three host plants. L1 = first larval instar; L2 = second larval instar; L3 = third larval instar. Cucumber B. cucurbitae 49.67 ± 3.21 a 17.33 ± 2.31 a 46.33 ± 0.58 a 96±1a 16.33 ± 1.15 a 601 25.1 ± 1.45 a D. ciliatus 72.33 ± 1.53 b 21±2a 49.67 ± 1.15 b 179 ± 11.79 b 21.67 ± 0.58 b 842 35.1 ± 1.26 b Pumpkin B. cucurbitae 49.67 ± 3.21 a 17 ± 1.73 a 46.67 ± 1.53 a 110.33 ± 12.42 a 16.33 ± 1.15 a 616 25.6 ± 1.94 a D. ciliatus 75.33 ± 1.15 b 24 ± 5.29 b 46±4a 185±8.19 b 21±0b 834 34.8 ± 0.77 b Squash B. cucurbitae 49.33 ± 2.08 a 19.33 ± 1.53 a 48±0a 112.33 ± 14.36 a 16.33 ± 1.15 a 621 25.8 ± 1.90 a D. ciliatus 71.66 ± 1.15 b 23±1b 46.33 ± 2.31 b 168.33 ± 3.06 b 20.66 ± 0.58 b 826 33.5 ± 0.89 b Vayssières et al.: Demographic parameters and biotic factors of two Dacini species on Réunion Island 93

94 Proceedings of the 6th International Fruit Fly Symposium with 2.7 eggs per day for cucumber versus 3.5 for pumpkin and 6.6 for squash at 25 C. Egg hatching success Tables 3 & 4 show that there was no significant difference in egg hatch between the two fruit fly species; more than 88% of eggs hatched for both species at 25 C. Egg incubation period at four temperatures At all temperatures tested, 30 C (Table 5), 25 C (Table 6), 20 C (Table 7) and 15 C (Table 8), melon fly had a significantly shorter incubation period than the Ethiopian fruit fly. Rate of development of larval instars at four temperatures At 30 C (Table 5), 25 C (Table 6), 20 C (Table 7) and 15 C (Table 8), the larval instars of melon fly developed significantly faster than those of the Ethiopian fruit fly. The terms R-selection and K-selection can be used to describe extreme strategies of exploitation of host plants (McArthur & Wilson 1967). This classification considers demographic parameters in relation to their main biotic factors. R-selection corresponds to unpredictable environmental conditions (short-lived host plants) and K-selection to stable ones (long-lived host plants). Adults of B.cucurbitae are classified as R-strategists, are large and have great mobility, high fecundity (more than 1000 eggs per female on the most favourable host plant), high daily fecundity (an average of eight eggs per day per female), a high fertility (more than 90%), a long life span (more than five months), and a short egg eclosion period (24 h at 30 C). Other plants belonging to the families Solanaceae and Passifloraceae are occasionally infested by larvae of the melon fly. B. cucurbitae spend more energy than D. ciliatus in effectively using environmental resources. Adults of D. ciliatus are smaller and have a lower mobility, lower fecundity (~500 eggs per female on the most favourable host plant), lower daily fecundity (an average of two eggs per day per female), lower fertility (83%), a shorter life span (four months), and a longer egg eclosion period (31 h at 30 C). Owing to these characteristics, the Ethiopian fruit fly can be classified as a K-strategist. Significant differences in demographic parameters and main biotic factors (egg incubation and instar development) between the two fruit flies species explain the predominance of B. cucurbitae Table 8. Egg incubation period and speed of development of larval instars of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Dacus ciliatus at 15 C on pumpkin. L1 = first larval instar; L2 = second larval instar; L3 = third larval instar. Pumpkin B. cucurbitae 96±0a 48±0a 72±24a 205±41.57 a 26.67 ± 0.58 a 1061 44.2 ± 2.52 a D. ciliatus 120±0b 96±24b 120±10b 224±13.86 a 63±1b 2072 86 ± 12 b

Vayssières et al.: Demographic parameters and biotic factors of two Dacini species on Réunion Island 95 on D. ciliatus on Réunion Island. Furthermore, the classification of the melon fly as an R-strategist can explain its worldwide distribution and its ability to colonize new areas such as in West Africa in 1999 and 2000 (Vayssières 2000), which were then already occupied by the Ethiopian fruit fly (Mali, northern Ivory Coast, Guinea, Senegal). REFERENCES McARTHUR, R.H. & WILSON, E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. SAS INSTITUTE 1997. The SAS system for Windows, ver. 6, 4th edn, vol. 2, Lifetest procedure. 1027 1070. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. VAYSSIÈRES, J.F. 2000. Rapport de mission au Mali sur le complexe des mouches des fruits (Diptera Tephritidae) inféodées au manguier. Projet CAE/SEG/USAID.