Cell-based immunotherapy products for the treatment of blood cancers and inherited blood disorders. Company Presentation June 2016

Similar documents
Annual Results 2017 & Business Update 13 April 2018

Making hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) safer and more effective

Making bone marrow transplantations safer and more effective

Haploidentical Transplantation: The Answer to our Donor Problems? Mary M. Horowitz, MD, MS CIBMTR, Medical College of Wisconsin January 2017

Bone Marrow Transplantation and the Potential Role of Iomab-B

The National Marrow Donor Program. Graft Sources for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Simon Bostic, URD Transplant Recipient

Reduced-intensity Conditioning Transplantation

MUD SCT. Pimjai Niparuck Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Haploidentical Transplantation today: and the alternatives

One Day BMT Course by Thai Society of Hematology. Management of Graft Failure and Relapsed Diseases

The future of HSCT. John Barrett, MD, NHBLI, NIH Bethesda MD

Haplo vs Cord vs URD Debate

Rob Wynn RMCH & University of Manchester, UK. HCT in Children

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: State of the Art in 2018 RICHARD W. CHILDS M.D. BETHESDA MD

Revista Cubana de Hematología, Inmunología y Hemoterapia. 2017; 36 (Suplemento).

Company Overview. January 2019

Company Overview. October 2018

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Sickle Cell Disease- An update

Current Status of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

High dose cyclophosphamide in HLAhaploidentical

An Introduction to Bone Marrow Transplant

What s a Transplant? What s not?

Stem Cell Transplantation

Myeloablative and Reduced Intensity Conditioning for HSCT Annalisa Ruggeri, MD, Hôpital Saint Antoine Eurocord- Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris

Federica Galaverna, 1 Daria Pagliara, 1 Deepa Manwani, 2 Rajni Agarwal-Hashmi, 3 Melissa Aldinger, 4 Franco Locatelli 1

The question is not whether or not to deplete T-cells, but how to deplete which T-cells

Corporate Medical Policy

Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation

MUD HSCT as first line Treatment in Idiopathic SAA. Dr Sujith Samarasinghe Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK

What s new in Blood and Marrow Transplant? Saar Gill, MD PhD Jan 22, 2016

AIH, Marseille 30/09/06

Haploidentical Transplants for Lymphoma. Andrea Bacigalupo Universita Cattolica Policlinico Gemelli Roma - Italy

5/9/2018. Bone marrow failure diseases (aplastic anemia) can be cured by providing a source of new marrow

Corporate Medical Policy

Introduction to Clinical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) George Chen, MD Thursday, May 03, 2018

Experience of patients transplanted with naïve T cell depleted stem cell graft in CMUH

ASCO Analyst & Investor Webcast. June 1, 2018

Trends in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. AAMAC Patient Education Day Oct 2014

Related haploidentical donors versus matched unrelated donors

Making Hope A Reality December 10, Nasdaq : BLUE

Quarterly Update & ASH 2017 Abstract Conference Call

Corporate Medical Policy

EBMT Complications and Quality of Life Working Party Educational Course

Does NK cell alloreactivity prevent relapse? Yes!!! Andrea Velardi Bone Marrow Transplant Program University of Perugia

March Corporate Presentation

Alloreattività e Tolleranza nei Trapianti di Cellule Staminali Emopoietiche Allogeniche

Dr. Joseph McGuirk Professor of Medicine, BMT Medical Director, Interim Director, Division of Hematology/Oncology

UNRELATED DONOR TRANSPLANTATION FOR SICKLE CELL DISEASE AN UPDATE

Bone Marrow Transplantation in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. An overview for the Myelodysplasia Support Group of Ottawa

Patient-specific immunotherapy T-cell product ATIR

ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR ACUTE MYELOBLASTIC LEUKEMIAS

Business Update & Financial Results for Q1 2018

Transplantation - Challenges for the future. Dr Gordon Cook S t James s Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust

Acknowledgements. Department of Hematological Malignancy and Cellular Therapy, University of Kansas Medical Center

Le infezioni fungine nel trapianto di cellule staminali emopoietiche. Claudio Viscoli Professor of Infectious Disease University of Genova, Italy

ZIOPHARM / Intrexon Graft-Versus-Host Disease Exclusive Channel Collaboration SEPTEMBER 28, 2015

Corporate Medical Policy

Post Transplant Management for Sickle Cell. Title

NiCord Single Unit Expanded Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation: Results of Phase I/II Trials

Therapeutic Advances in Treatment of Aplastic Anemia. Seiji Kojima MD. PhD.

Sickle Cell Diseasechronic. curable disease? Objectives. Why would a family ask about cure for SCD?

Patient-specific immunotherapy designed to reduce the risk of GVHD and relapse in stem cell transplantations

Sunesis Pharmaceuticals Reports Third Quarter 2014 Financial Results and Recent Highlights

COHEM Barcellona 2012 Hemoglobinopathies debate

AML:Transplant or ChemoTherapy?

3.1 Clinical safety of chimeric or humanized anti-cd25 (ch/anti-cd25)

Are We There Yet? Gene Therapy and BMT as Curative Therapies in Sickle Cell. Ann Haight, MD 9 Sept 2017

Corporate Presentation. December, 2018

Disclosures of: Emanuele Angelucci

Corporate Overview June 2014 Jefferies Healthcare Conference NASDAQ: GLYC

Programmed Cellular Immunotherapies

Summary of Changes BMT CTN 1101 Version 7.0 to 8.0 Dated: January 18, Original text: Changed to: Rationale

Understanding the role of ex vivo T cell depletion

HLA-DR-matched Parental Donors for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-risk Acute Leukemia

Actinium Pharmaceuticals Highlights Analysis of Pivotal Iomab-B Phase 3 SIERRA Trial Presented in Oral Session at ASH Annual Meeting

Il Trapianto da donatore MUD. Alessandro Rambaldi

Cord Blood Transplant. E. Gluckman Eurocord ESH-EBMT training course Vienna 2014

Summary of Changes Page BMT CTN 1205 Protocol Amendment #4 (Version 5.0) Dated July 22, 2016

Factors Influencing Haematopoietic Progenitor cell transplant outcome Optimising donor selection

Advancing Cell Therapies

Help patients with immunotherapy designed to reduce risk of GVHD in stem cell transplantations

Full Year 2017 Financial Results. February 14, 2018

Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2016 Health Care Conference

ISCT Workshop #7 Perspectives in Cell Selection Immunomagnetic Selection

Multi-Virus-Specific T cell Therapy for Patients after HSC and CB Transplant

PLEO-CMT Top-line Results. Presentation October 16, 2018

Corporate Presentation May Transforming Immuno-Oncology Using Next-Generation Immune Cell Engagers

Haploidentical Donor Transplants: Outcomes and Comparison to Other. Paul V. O Donnell BSBMT Education Day London 12 October 2011

THE ROLE OF TBI IN STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION. Dr. Biju George Professor Department of Haematology CMC Vellore

Is in vitro T-cell depletion necessary for Haploidentical TransplantationTitle of Presentation. Disclosure of Interest: Nothing to Disclose

February Company Overview. Curative Treatments for Cancer and Orphan Genetic Diseases

Results of Nicord Phase I II Trials and Plans for Phase III Trial

Back to the Future: The Resurgence of Bone Marrow??

Company presentation. Claudio Bordignon, Chairman and CEO. Jefferies Global Healthcare Conference New York, 7 June 2012

Q4 Report Webcast February 7, 2019 Presenters: Renée Aguiar-Lucander, CEO Fredrik Johansson, CFO

Virological Surveillance in Paediatric HSCT Recipients

Corporate Medical Policy

REATA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. ANNOUNCES SECOND QUARTER 2018 FINANCIAL RESULTS AND AN UPDATE ON DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS

Neutrophil Recovery: The. Posttransplant Recovery. Bus11_1.ppt

Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation with post transplantation Cyclophosphamide for the treatment of Fanconi Anemia

Transcription:

Cell-based immunotherapy products for the treatment of blood cancers and inherited blood disorders Company Presentation June 2016

Disclaimer These slides and the accompanying oral presentation contain forward-looking statements and information. Forwardlooking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry s actual results, levels or activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those anticipated by such statements. The use of words such as may, might, will, should, could, expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate, project, intend, future, potential or continue, and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements. For example, all statements we make regarding (i) the initiation, timing, cost, progress and results of our preclinical and clinical studies and our research and development programs, (ii) our ability to advance product candidates into, and successfully complete, clinical studies, (iii) the timing or likelihood of regulatory filings and approvals, (iv) our ability to develop, manufacture and commercialize our product candidates and to improve the manufacturing process, (v) the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates, (vi) the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates and our ability to serve those markets, and (vii) our expectations regarding our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our product candidates, are forward looking. All forward-looking statements are based on current estimates, assumptions and expectations by our management that, although we believe to be reasonable, are inherently uncertain. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expected. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it was made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. This presentation is not, and nothing in it should be construed as, an offer, invitation or recommendation in respect of our securities, or an offer, invitation or recommendation to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any of our securities in any jurisdiction. Neither this presentation nor anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment. This presentation is not intended to be relied upon as advice to investors or potential investors and does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any investor. 2

Company highlights and introduction to ATIR 1 Lead product ATIR is an innovative immunotherapy which addresses the risks and limitations of current bone marrow and stem cell treatments (HSCT) 2 Strong clinical Phase I and Phase II data package No patient (0/42) experienced grade III/IV GVHD Significantly improved Overall Survival Excellent safety and efficacy profile demonstrated to date 3 Clear upcoming route to market and strong news flow catalysts Initiation of Phase III trial in 2H 2016 (ATIR101) Expected submission to EMA for conditional approval (ATIR101) Initiation of clinical trial in Thalassemia (ATIR201) 4 Experienced management team and international, diverse shareholder base 3

HSCT as curative treatment for blood cancer and inherited blood disorders Basic principle of HSCT 1. Destroy the diseased bone marrow 2. Create bone marrow space in the recipient for the donor cells to engraft 3. Replace it with healthy donor cells 4. Suppress the immune system or eliminate the recipient T-cells to minimize risks of rejection 4

Significant risks & limitations in HSCT Causes of death after MUD HSCT 1% 6% Risks Opportunistic infections Immunosuppressed patients are highly susceptible to pathogens 19% 17% 20% 37% Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) GVHD occurs when donor T-cells recognize a patient s tissue as foreign. Incidence of grade III/IV GVHD is as high as 30% and often fatal Relapse GvHD Infections Other Organ Failure New Malignancy 20% CIBMTR-data includes centers located globally and is measured over 2011-2012 Limitations Cancer relapse Ablated immune system has poor ability to fight residual leukemic cells Donor availability Approx. 75% of patients do not have a matched family donor and approx. 35% of patients eligible for HSCT will not find a matched donor in time 5

Haplo-HSCT with ATIR101: addressing risks and limitations of HSCT within standard hospital procedures ATIR101 allows for an immunosuppressant-free transplant regimen for haploidentical donor transplantation (i.e. from a family member) Adjunctive to (partially) T-cell depleted stem cell graft donor Donor CD34+ PBMC graft Selective photodepletion to eliminate GVHD-causing T-cells Conditioning Haplo HSCT Isolation ATIR101 infusion Myeloablative conditioning including ATG T-cell depleted stem cell graft from family member No prophylactic immunosuppression Donor lymphocyte infusion 28 32 days post- HSCT 6

ATIR101 manufacturing removes GVHD-causing T-cells while retaining key immune cells 1. Immune cells collected and mixed ex vivo 2. Activation of donor T- cells 3. TH9402 addition 4. Exposure to light 5. ATIR101 infusion ATIR101 characteristics Selective removal of GVHD-causing T-cells Patient Key immune cells are retained to protect against infections T-cells directed against leukemic cells are Donor GVHD-causing donor T- cells are activated by patient cells TH9402 is added TH9402 is retained only in activated donor T-cells Light induced killing Cells formulated for infusion Infusion 28-42 days after haplo HSCT retained Day 1-4 Day 5 Non-activated GVHDcausing donor T-cells Irradiated patient cells Activated GVHD-causing donor T-cells Graft-versus-Leukemia T-cells Activated GVHD-causing donor T-cells with TH9402 retained Other immune cells (e.g. virus specific memory and effector cells, naïve cells, NK cells) 7

ATIR101: alloreactive T-cells eliminated while T-cell response to allo viruses/bacteria/fungi Example from Phase II CR-AIR-007 release testing Typical example in CR-AIR-007 Donor ATIR Proliferation Index (PI) 10 8 6 4 1.6 1.4 1.2 Donor ATIR : Cells from the donor/starting material : Final product manufactured from donor Donor Recipient 1.0 Donor Recipient 3rd party CD3/28 Selective depletion Retained functional cells 3rd party SAFETY POTENCY 8

ATIR101 contains virus-specific T-cells Virus-specific T-cells before and after manufacturing of ATIR101 Control EBV CMV Influenza Donor ATIR 9

Graft-versus-Leukemia T-cells have been detected in ATIR101 Figure 2: ATIR101 cells were thawed, recovered for two days in medium supplemented withil-2, IL-7 and IL-15 followed by stimulation with Myb628/HLA-B44 aapcs. Myb628 specific T cell expansion was assessed after one (upper panel) or two (lower panel) rounds of stimulation with a Myb628/HLA-B44 multimer. As control, cells were stained with an irrelevant HLA-B44 multimer. Collaboration with Prof. Angela Krackhardt, Medizinische Klinik III, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TU Munich, Munich, Germany 10

Overview of ATIR101/201 clinical studies Trial ID # Patients Aim Phase Design Status CR-GVH- 001 CR-AIR- 006 19 Dose finding Phase I/II Open-label, dose- escalation 158 Control group Observational cohort trial Completed 5 year follow-up completed Completed Data analysis CR-AIR- 007 23 Safety and efficacy Phase II Open-label, multi-center trial using optimal ATIR101 dose On-going All patients enrolled CR-AIR- 008 15 Dose Optimization Phase II Open-label, exploratory trial using repeat dose administration On-going First patient enrolled and treated Planned Clinical Studies 2016 CR-AIR- 009 Approx. 200 Safety and efficacy Phase III Randomized clinical trial: Haplo + ATIR101 (KIADIS) vs. Haplo + Cyclophosphamide (Baltimore) CR-BD- 001 Approx. 10 Safety and efficacy Phase II Exploratory Phase II trial in pediatric patients suffering from β-thalassemia major 11

Trial characteristics & endpoints Phase II CR-AIR-007 Trial characteristics (EudraCT 2012 004461 41: US-IND#14255) Design: open-label, single arm, multi-center study Patient population: AML or ALL in first remission with high-risk features or in second or higher remission No suitable matched donor Haploidentical family Locations: CA, BE, DE, UK (8 sites in total) Primary endpoint: Transplant Related Mortality (TRM) at 6 months Secondary endpoints: Acute and chronic GVHD Immune reconstitution TRM, relapse, Overall Survival (OS), up to 24 months Patient follow-up (per 24 March 2016): Median 414 days (range 110 742) Last patient reached primary endpoint on 24 March 2016 12

Patient & donor characteristics Patient and donors N=23 patients (HSCT + ATIR101) Median patient age (range): 41 years (21 64) Gender: 13 female, 10 male Median donor age (range): 33 years (21-61 ) Diagnosis AML: n=16 (70%): 11 in CR1 5 in CR2 ALL: n =7 (30%): 4 in CR1 3 in CR2 Risk classification Cytogenetic risk profile 1 : Favorable 0 Intermediate 9 (39 %) Adverse 14 (61 %) Disease-risk index 2 : Low risk index 0 Intermediate risk index 10 (43 %) High risk index 13 (57 %) 1 Mrozek K, et al. JCO 2012, 30 (36): 4515-4523 2 Armand P, et al. Blood 2014, 123 (23): 3664-3671 13

HSCT characteristics Myeloablative conditioning TBI (1200 cgy; n=11) or melphalan (120mg/m 2 ; n=12) Thiotepa (10 mg/kg), fludarabine (30 mg/m 2 x 5d) and ATG (2.5mg/kg x 4d) HSCT CliniMACS CD34 isolation system (Miltenyi Biotec) Target: 8-11x10 6 CD34+ cells/kg, with max. of 3x10 4 CD3+ cells/kg Prophylaxis No GVHD prophylaxis CMV/EBV monitoring Prophylactic use of ganciclovir/foscarnet (CMV + recipient/donor) ATIR101 infusion Day 28 post HSCT (median) 14

Top-line results: acute and chronic GVHD Acute GVHD No (0%) grade III/IV GVHD after ATIR101 infusion Only 3 cases of grade II GVHD Chronic GVHD Only 1 case of chronic GVHD (severe) has been reported (median of >400 days follow-up) Conclusions top-line results GVHD ATIR101 is safe Haplo HSCT without any grade III/IV GVHD Overall exposure to ATIR101 Phase I/II + Phase II combined: N=42 Grade III/IV acute GVHD: 0% 15

Top-line results: Transplant Related Mortality, relapse and Overall Survival Results at 100 days, 6 months and 12 months 1 Time after HSCT N = 23 100 days 6 months 12 months Transplant Related 0 3 (13%) 29% Mortality Death due to relapse/disease progression 0 1 (4%) 10.5% Overall Survival 23 (100%) 19 (83%) 64% Primary endpoint: TRM 6-months = 3 / 23 (13%); all infection-related No mortality within first 100 days post-hsct Only two patients relapsed within 12 months post-hsct Relapse at day 61 and 90 post-hsct 1 based on Kaplan-Meier estimates 16

Comparison with control data from an observational cohort study 1 Transplant Related Mortality Overall Survival P=0.005 P=0.0026 HSCT + ATIR101 HSCT + ATIR101 ATIR101 significantly reduces TRM and improves OS compared to CD34+ haplo-transplants 1 Data from cohort study, CR-AIR-006: poster S. Mielke, P442 EBMT2016 17

GRFS 1 Comparing transplant regimens on GRFS GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) is survival without: Acute GVHD (grade III/IV) Chronic GVHD Cancer relapse Key advantage HSCT + ATIR101 1 2, 3 No acute GVHD, limited chronic GVHD Low relapse rate Comparison to alternative donor source Improved GRFS compared to one-locus Mismatched Unrelated Donor transplants (MMUD) and to Umbilical Cord Blood (UCB) transplants 1. Haplo + ATIR101 vs MUD* (10/10) p=0.134 2. Haplo + ATIR101 vs MMUD (9/10) p=0.0057 3. Haplo + ATIR101 vs UCB p=0.0014 1 Holtan et al. 2015, Blood 125: 1333-1338 * Matched Unrelated Donor 18

Comparison with literature on post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) PTCy (Baltimore protocol) Post-HSCT use of high doses of cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an emerging standard for haploidentical stem cell transplantations Unmanipulated graft used Post-HSCT use of high dose cyclophosphamide to control GVHD Additional use of immunosuppressants (calcineurin inhibitors/mmf) for 6 months Outcome 1 PTCy 2 ATIR101 Grade II/IV agvhd 3 16% 4% Grade III/IV agvhd 3 7% 0 cgvhd 28% 4% NRM 12% 29% Relapse 41% 10.5% OS 65% 64% Patient characteristics: Disease-risk index (DRI) Low risk index 5% 0 Intermediate risk index 63% 43% High risk index 32% 57% 1 Data at 12-months post-hsct (Kaplan-Meier estimates) 2 AML patients, myeloablative conditioning (Ciurea 2015) 3 GVHD at day 90 2 Ciurea et al. 2015, Blood 126: 1033-1040 19

Conclusions Phase II (CR-AIR-007) ATIR101 significantly reduces TRM and improves OS ATIR101 is safe and does not cause grade III/IV GVHD Relapse rates on ATIR101 protocol are very low Improved clinical benefit over 9/10 MMUD or umbilical cord transplants on event-free survival (GRFS) ATIR101 provides a safe and effective, immunosuppressant-free regimen for haploidentical transplantation Substantially less relapse and GVHD on ATIR101 compared to posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) Second dose of ATIR101 might improve survival even further Kiadis is preparing a randomized Phase III trial comparing haploidentical HSCT with PTCy against a T-depleted HSCT + ATIR101 20

EMA FDA Regulatory strategy update Process of Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) submission started, Rapporteurs appointed Meetings held with Rapporteur and co-rapporteur Decision taken to prepare for MAA filing in 1Q 2017 (awaiting 1 year results CR- AIR-007, dossier writing, completion process validation) New ODD submitted: treatment in hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation (covers all indications) End-of-Phase II meeting held in June 2016 Health Canada Possibility to submit MAA to be discussed 2H 2016 21

Phase III: CR-AIR-009 Phase III design (CR-AIR-009) Randomized, controlled trial Comparing outcome of two haplo-hsct protocols: 1) Kiadis Protocol: T-cell depletion (CD34+ selection) + ATIR101 2) Baltimore Protocol: post HSCT Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) Primary endpoint: GFRS Event-free-survival (EFS) defined as GVHD-free AND Relapse-Free Survival (GRFS) Secondary endpoints: GVHD, NRM, RRM, DFS, OS Estimated sample size: 200 patients total Assumption of EFS of 60% for HSCT+ATIR and 40-45% for control group (PTCy) Trial conduct Global trial: North-America: USA & Canada Europe: Belgium, NL, UK, Germany, France, Italy Estimated number of trial sites: 40-50 End-of-Phase II meeting held with FDA (June 2016) Protocol will be finalized based on feedback Timelines Trial initiation 3Q 2016 First patient in 4Q 2016 Enrollment appr. 1.5 years 2Q 2018 Expected analysis 2Q 2019 22

Route to market in EU & US for ATIR101 FDA Launch Data submission Analysis Phase Trial ID # Patients 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Observational cohort trial CR-AIR- 006 157 Establish control group for EMA II (Efficacy trial) CR-AIR- 007 23 Confirm and extend safety and effectiveness II (Repeat administration trial) CR-AIR- 008 10-15 Dosing study III (Pivotal trial) CR-AIR- 009 appr. 200 Pivotal trial randomized, controlled Past Ongoing/planned 23

Route to market in EU & US for ATIR101 Submission EMA and HC 1 Endpoint reported FDA Launch Data submission Analysis Phase Trial ID # Patients 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Observational cohort trial CR-AIR- 006 157 Establish control group for EMA II (Efficacy trial) CR-AIR- 007 23 Confirm and extend safety and effectiveness II (Repeat administration trial) CR-AIR- 008 10-15 Dosing study III (Pivotal trial) CR-AIR- 009 appr. 200 Pivotal trial randomized, controlled Past Ongoing/planne d 24

ATIR may be used in additional indications Growth options and market size ATIR Market size (in new patients p.a.) ~ 19,000 ~ 6,000 19,000 TBD Growth options Total potential market Haplo HSCT in blood cancers Thalassemia ATIR201 Cannibalization of cord blood and MUD based HSCT in blood cancers Expansion into: Additional cancer indications Inherited blood disorders Creating chimerism in solid organ transplantation Time 25

ATIR201 in β-thalassemia major: current therapeutic environment Current approaches in β-thalassemia major: Symptomatic approaches (lifelong): Standard of care is symptomatic: blood transfusions and iron chelators Drug support to improve hematopoiesis Curative approaches (by intent): Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation to replace the diseased system: Limited availability of matching donors or healthy sibling donors Significant/high risk of infectious complications and GVHD Gene-therapy based autologous approaches (e.g. Bluebird Bio): Unknown duration of gene expression Unknown level of gene expression Risk of proto-oncogenic insertion of gene into genome 26

Clinical program ATIR201 Collaboration with TIF Awareness on HSCT option (specifically haploidentical) Access to families and to HSCT CR-BD-001 Exploratory Phase I/II trial in pediatric patients with β-thalassemia major ATIR201 as adjuvant to a T-cell depleted haploidentical HSCT Optimize manufacturing for pediatric setting Expected centers: Regensburg (Germany), London, Manchester, Birmingham (UK) Protocol drafted, submissions planned Trial to be initiated in 2H 2016 First results to be expected in 2017, full read-out in 2018 27

Anticipated Company milestones 2016 1H 2016 Topline results announced CR-AIR-007 trial (ATIR101) Set-up US-based ATIR101 manufacturer for Phase III Opening US clinical sites and strengthening US footprint and presence 2H 2016 Read-out (safety) of CR-AIR-008 trial First patient to be enrolled in ATIR101 Phase III trial (CR-AIR-009) Initiation ATIR201 Phase I/II Thalassemia trial (CR-BD-001) Expected submission to EMA for (conditional) approval ATIR101 (Q1, 2017) 28

Financial information Financial highlights Shares listed via an initial public offering (IPO) on Euronext Amsterdam and Euronext Brussels on 2 July 2015 raising gross proceeds of EUR 34.7 million. The equity position of the Company improved significantly and increased to EUR 25.7 million at year-end 2015 compared to EUR 2.7 million at the end of 2014. With net proceeds of EUR 31.2 million raised in the IPO, the Company s cash position improved to EUR 28.7 million at year-end 2015, which is an increase of EUR 23 million compared to cash of EUR 5.7 million at the end of 2014. Operating loss increased to EUR 16 million in 2015 from a loss of EUR 6.2 million in 2014. Operating expenses for 2015 included non-cash share-based payments of EUR 7.8 million. Net loss increased from EUR 7.8 million in 2014 to EUR 16.5 million in 2015. 29

Financial information 30

Thank you