Blood Pressure Reduction Among Acute Stroke Patients A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Similar documents
Blood Pressure Management in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Supplementary Online Content

Contents. Version 1.0: 01/02/2010 Protocol# ISRCTN Page 1 of 7

5/2/2016. Outpatient Stroke Management Sheila Smith MD May 5, 2016

Critical Review Form Therapy

Blood Pressure Management in Acute Stroke. Bradley Molyneaux, M.D., Ph.D. Departments of Neurology & Critical Care Medicine University of Pittsburgh

Redgrave JN, Coutts SB, Schulz UG et al. Systematic review of associations between the presence of acute ischemic lesions on

Branko N Huisa M.D. Assistant Professor of Neurology UNM Stroke Center

The randomized study of efficiency and safety of antithrombotic therapy in

Anticoagulants and Head Injuries. Asaad Shujaa,MD,FRCPC,FAAEM Assistant Professor,weill Corneal Medicne Senior Consultant,HMC Qatar

CLOSE. Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale, Oral anticoagulants or Antiplatelet Therapy to Prevent Stroke Recurrence

FVIIa for Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke Administered at Earliest Time (FASTEST) Trial. Joseph P. Broderick, MD James Grotta, MD Jordan Elm, PhD

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT): What we know, what we think and what s to come

Clinical Features and Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke Associated with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.

Xi Li, Jing Li, Frederick A Masoudi, John A Spertus, Zhenqiu Lin, Harlan M Krumholz, Lixin Jiang for the China PEACE Collaborative Group

Thrombolysis-WAKE UP Intra-arterial interventions DEFUSE 3 Haemorrhagic Stroke - TICH 2 Secondary Prevention CROMIS 2 Secondary Prevention NAVIGATE

NURSING DEPARTMENT CRITICAL CARE POLICY MANUAL CRITICAL CARE PROTOCOLS. ACUTE CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT TPA (ACTIVASE /alteplase) FOR THROMBOLYSIS

ADVANCE post trial ObservatioNal Study

HYPERTENSION: UPDATE 2018

Stroke Update Elaine J. Skalabrin MD Medical Director and Neurohospitalist Sacred Heart Medical Center Stroke Center

What can we learn from the AVERT trial (so far)?

Parameter Optimized Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

The earlier BP control the better cardiovascular outcome. Jin Oh Na Cardiovascular center Korea University Medical College

TENNESSEE STROKE REGISTRY QUARTERLY REPORT

Supplement materials:

Stroke Update. Lacunar 19% Thromboembolic 6% SAH 13% ICH 13% Unknown 32% Hemorrhagic 26% Ischemic 71% Other 3% Cardioembolic 14%

Online Appendix (JACC )

Emergency Room Procedure The first few hours in hospital...

Journal Club. 1. Develop a PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) question for this study

Table S1: Diagnosis and Procedure Codes Used to Ascertain Incident Hip Fracture

Supplementary Online Content

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Clinician Guide SEPTEMBER 2017

T. Suithichaiyakul Cardiomed Chula

CANADIAN STROKE BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS. Prevention of Stroke Evidence Tables Blood Pressure Management

Managing Hypertension in the Perioperative Arena

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

Retrospective Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Clopidogrel in the Treatment of Acute Cerebral Infarction

Liping Liu Dpet. of Neurology and Stroke Center Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University

Post Hoc Analysis of the PARADIGM Heart Failure Trial:

Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care. (Updated 2008) Section # 3 Section # 3 Hyperacute Stroke Management

Comparison of Five Major Recent Endovascular Treatment Trials

How Low Should You Go? Management of Blood Pressure in Intracranial Hemorrhage

AVERT Trial Debate: Implications for Practice Have we AVERT ed the real message?

Strokecenter Key lessons of MR CLEAN study

Dr Ben Turner. Consultant Neurologist and Honorary Senior Lecturer Barts and The London NHS Trust London Bridge Hospital

BLOOD PRESSURE-LOWERING TREATMENT

2018 Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke Guidelines Update

Mortality as an Efficacy or Safety Endpoint : Lessons Learned from the Heart Failure Trials

The Effect of Diagnostic Catheter Angiography on Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Being Considered for Endovascular Treatment

Document Title: The Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke & TIA

AGING, BLOOD PRESSURE & CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE EVENT RISK. Michael Smolensky, Ph.D. The University of Texas Austin & Houston

HIP ATTACK Trial: Can we improve outcomes after a hip fracture with accelerated surgery? PJ Devereaux, MD, PhD

Managing HTN in the Elderly: How Low to Go

Review of the TICH-2 Trial

Alliance A Symptomatic brain radionecrosis after receiving radiosurgery for

The importance of follow-up after a cardiac event: CARDIAC REHABILITATION. Dr. Guy Letcher

Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) Trial of Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients

CEREBRO VASCULAR ACCIDENTS

Patrick Altmann October 2012

FOCUS: Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision Results. Martin Dennis on behalf of the FOCUS collaborators

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

University of Padova, Padua, Italy, and HARVEST Study Group, Italy

Quality Measures MIPS CV Specific

Serum levels of galectin-1, galectin-3, and galectin-9 are associated with large artery atherosclerotic

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)

4/4/17 HYPERTENSION TARGETS: WHAT DO WE DO NOW? SET THE STAGE BP IN CLINICAL TRIALS?

What s the evidence, why do guidelines differ, and what should the GP do?

Starting or Resuming Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy after ICH: A Neurology Perspective

An international, double-blind, phase III randomized trial. Main Results

/ / / / / / Hospital Abstraction: Stroke/TIA. Participant ID: Hospital Code: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Dronedarone for the treatment of non-permanent atrial fibrillation

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Impact of Nicorandil on Renal Function in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Pre-Existing Renal Dysfunction

Updated Ischemic Stroke Guidelines นพ.ส ชาต หาญไชยพ บ ลย ก ล นายแพทย ทรงค ณว ฒ สาขาประสาทว ทยา สถาบ นประสาทว ทยา กรมการแพทย กระทรวงสาธารณส ข

TAVR-Update Andrzej Boguszewski MD, FACC, FSCAI Vice Chairman, Cardiology Mid-Michigan Health Associate Professor Michigan State University, Central

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

2003 World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) Statement on Management of Hypertension.

The Epidemiology of Stroke and Vascular Risk Factors in Cognitive Aging

Polypharmacy - arrhythmic risks in patients with heart failure

Supplementary appendix

WAKE-UP has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/ ) under grant agreement n

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

(n=6279). Continuous variables are reported as mean with 95% confidence interval and T1 T2 T3. Number of subjects

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

LEADER Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

Update on the only remaining Carotid Multicenter Randomised International Trial in the World:ACST-2

SBP in range of 120 to 140 :no progression or regression of CAD. Sipahi et al., 2006

Supplementary Online Content

Patient characteristics. Intervention Comparison Length of followup. Outcome measures. Number of patients. Evidence level.

The Latest Generation of Clinical

Protocol for IV rtpa Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

TENNESSEE STROKE REGISTRY QUARTERLY REPORT

Advancing Stroke Systems of Care to Improve Outcomes Update on Target: Stroke Phase II

and Treatment in Emergency Care) Trial: Intravenous Glucose, Insulin & Potassium (GIK) in Emergency Medical Services

Transcription:

Blood Pressure Reduction Among Acute Stroke Patients A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Jiang He, Yonghong Zhang, Tan Xu, Weijun Tong, Shaoyan Zhang, Chung-Shiuan Chen, Qi Zhao, Jing Chen for CATIS investigators School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, USA

Background Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the leading cause of serious, long-term disability worldwide. Clinical trials have documented that lowering BP reduces the risk of stroke in hypertensives and normotensives with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. The effect of immediate antihypertensive treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients with elevated BP is uncertain.

Objectives The primary objective is to test whether an immediate BP reduction within the first 48 hours after the onset of an acute ischemic stroke would reduce death and major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge. The secondary objective is to test the effects of antihypertensive treatment during the acute phase of ischemic stroke on mortality, major disability, and vascular events at 3 months.

Study Participants China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS) was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, blinded end-points trial. 4,071 patients aged 22 years who had ischemic stroke, confirmed by brain CT or MRI, within 48 hours of symptom onset and who had an elevated systolic BP between 140 and <220 mm Hg were included. Patients were recruited from 26 hospitals across China between August 2009 and May 2013.

Exclusion Criteria Severe heart failure (NYHA class III and IV), acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, atrial fibrillation, aortic dissection and cerebrovascular stenosis Patients in a deep coma Blood pressure >220/120 mm Hg Resistant hypertension Intravenous thrombolytic therapy Current pregnant women Unable to participate in the follow-up examination

Study Participant Flow Diagram 22,230 patients assessed for eligibility 4,071 randomized 2,038 randomized to antihypertensive treatment 2,033 randomized to control 2,038 included in analysis at 14 days or hospital discharge 2,033 included in analysis at 14 days or hospital discharge 50 lost to follow-up 46 lost to follow-up 1,988 included in analysis at 3 months 1,987 included in analysis at 3 months

Intervention Antihypertensive treatment Lowering systolic BP by 10-25% within the first 24 hours after randomization Achieving a systolic BP <140 and diastolic BP <90 mm Hg within 7 days, and maintaining this level of BP control during the remainder of a patient s hospitalization Control Discontinuing all home antihypertensive medications

Baseline Characteristics of Participants Characteristics Treatment Control Age, years 62.1 ± 10.8 61.8 ± 11.0 Male sex, % 64.6 63.3 Time from onset, hours 15.3 ± 12.9 14.9 ± 13.0 SBP at entry, mm Hg 166.7 ± 17.3 165.6 ± 16.5 Median NIHSS Score (IQR) 4.0 (2.0-7.0) 4.0 (3.0-8.0) Hypertension, % 79.0 78.7 Use of BP medications, % 49.8 48.4 Subtypes, % Thrombotic 77.3 78.5 Embolic 4.9 5.1 Lacunar 20.5 18.9

Systolic BP Since Randomization by Treatment Group

BP Reduction During Hospitalization Treatment Control (95% CI) P value Absolute BP changes within 24 hrs, mm Hg Systolic -21.8 ± 15.9-12.7 ± 17.3-9.1 (-10.2, -8.1) <.001 Diastolic -11.0 ± 10.5-6.9 ± 11.0-4.1 (-4.7, -3.4) <.001 Proportional BP changes within 24 hrs, % Systolic -12.7 ± 8.7-7.2 ± 9.8-5.5 (-4.9, -6.1) <.001 Diastolic -10.7 ± 10.1-6.4 ± 11.1-4.3 (-3.6, -4.9) <.001 BP at day 7 after randomization, mm Hg Systolic 137.3 ± 11.8 146.5 ± 13.6-9.3 (-10.1, -8.4) <.001 Diastolic 82.4 ± 7.2 86.4 ± 8.1-4.0 (-4.5, -3.5) <.001 BP at day 14 after randomization, mm Hg Systolic 135.2 ± 10.4 143.7 ± 14.0-8.6 (-9.7, -7.4) <.001 Diastolic 81.4 ± 7.4 85.3 ± 8.3-3.9 (-4.6, -3.1) <.001

Primary and Secondary Outcomes at 14 Days or Hospital Discharge Treatment Control Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Death or major disability, no. (%) 683 (33.6) 681 (33.6) 1.00 (0.88, 1.14).98 Median modified Rankin score (IQR) 2.0 (1.0-3.0) 2.0 (1.0-3.0).70 Death, no. (%) 25 (1.2) 25 (1.2) 1.00 (0.57, 1.74).99 Median duration of hospitalization (IQR), days 13.0 (9.0-14.0) 13.0 (9.0-14.0).28

Secondary Outcomes at the 3-Month Post-treatment Follow-up Visit Death or major disability, no. (%) Median modified Rankin score (IQR) Treatment Control 500 (25.2) 502 (25.3) 1.0 (1.0-3.0) 1.0 (1.0-3.0) Death, no. (%) 68 (3.4) 54 (2.7) Recurrent stroke, no. (%) Vascular events, no. (%) Death or vascular events, no. (%) 28 (1.4) 43 (2.2) 48 (2.4) 59 (3.0) 92 (4.6) 94 (4.7) Odds Ratio (95% CI) 0.99 (0.86, 1.15) 1.27 (0.88, 1.82) 0.65 (0.40, 1.04) 0.81 (0.55, 1.19) 0.98 (0.73, 1.31) P value.93.52.20.07.28.88

Antihypertensive Treatment Effect on Death or Major Disability at 14 Days According to Prespecified Subgroups Age, yrs Sex Time from onset, hrs Baseline SBP, mm Hg History of hypertension Antihypertensive medications NIHSS <65 65 Women Men <12 12-23 24 <160 160-179 180 No Yes No Yes 0-4 5-15 16 1.12 (0.94, 1.34) 0.87 (0.71, 1.05).054 1.05 (0.85, 1.30).61 0.98 (0.83, 1.15) 0.96 (0.80, 1.14) 1.15 (0.84, 1.57) 1.04 (0.81, 1.34) 1.08 (0.87, 1.35) 0.98 (0.80, 1.19) 0.90 (0.69, 1.19).59.59 1.00 (0.75, 1.32).97 1.00 (0.87, 1.16) 0.95 (0.79, 1.13).36 1.07 (0.88, 1.29) 1.14 (0.87, 1.49) 1.04 (0.86, 1.25) 0.67 (0.18, 2.44).66

Antihypertensive Treatment Effect on Death or Major Disability at 3 Months According to Prespecified Subgroups Age, yrs Sex Time from onset, hrs Baseline SBP, mm Hg History of hypertension Antihypertensive medications NIHSS <65 65 Women Men <12 12-23 24 <160 160-179 180 No Yes No Yes 0-4 5-15 16 1.02 (0.83, 1.25) 0.96 (0.78, 1.18).72 1.07 (0.85, 1.35).43 0.95 (0.79, 1.14) 1.10 (0.91, 1.34) 1.22 (0.85, 1.74) 0.73 (0.55, 0.97) 1.04 (0.81, 1.33) 1.07 (0.86, 1.33) 0.79 (0.59, 1.06).03.24 1.06 (0.77, 1.44).67 0.98 (0.83, 1.15) 0.95 (0.78, 1.16).53 1.04 (0.85, 1.28) 0.83 (0.61, 1.12) 1.19 (0.98, 1.44) 0.66 (0.28, 1.58).08

Conclusion Among patients with acute ischemic stroke, BP reduction with antihypertensive medications compared with the absence of antihypertensive medications did not reduce death and major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge. These findings suggest that unless a patient s BP 220/120 mmhg, the decision to lower BP with antihypertensive treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke should be based on individual clinical judgment.

Acknowledgements This study is supported by Tulane University and the Collins C. Diboll Private Foundation, both in New Orleans, LA; Soochow University, a Project of the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 81320108026), all in China. We acknowledge that the Changzhou Pharmaceutical Factory provided the study drug (Enalapril) for this trial. We thank the study participants and their relatives and the clinical staff at all participating hospitals for their support and contribution to this project.