Expanding the treatment options of Superficial vein thrombosis with Rivaroxaban

Similar documents
Current issues in the management of Superficial Vein Thrombosis - SVT

What is the impact of Superficial Vein Thrombosis?

Superficial Thrombophlebitis Treatment Guideline Review

Supplementary Online Content

Controversies in venous thromboembolism: to treat or not to treat superficial vein thrombosis

Trombosi venose superficiali e trombosi venose distali

Keynote lecture: Oral anticoagulation and DVT

The legally binding text is the original French version. Opinion 15 May 2013

Anticoagulation Forum: Management of Tiny Clots

DVT PROPHYLAXIS IN HOSPITALIZED MEDICAL PATIENTS SAURABH MAJI SR (PULMONARY,MEDICINE)

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs). Dr GM Benson Director NI Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre and Thrombosis Unit BHSCT

With All the New Drugs, This is How I Treat Acute DVT and Superficial Phlebitis

DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS (DVT): TREATMENT

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

Benefit risk profile of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in the management of venous thromboembolism

UPDATE ON TREATMENT OF ACUTE VENOUS THROMBOSIS

Rapid Fire-Top Articles You Need to Know

CURRENT & FUTURE THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM. Gordon Lowe Professor of Vascular Medicine University of Glasgow

Implications from the ACCP 2012 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Thrombosis: a case based approach

Duration of Anticoagulation? Peter Verhamme MD, PhD Department of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Leuven Belgium

Clinical Cases with Deep Venous Thrombosis - The position of Apixaban Stavros KAKKOS, MD, MSc, PhD, RVT

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)

The latest on the diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism

Updates in venous thromboembolism. Cecilia Becattini University of Perugia

Oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy for the acute and continued treatment of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. The EINSTEIN DVT study.

Focus: l embolia polmonare Per quanto la terapia anticoagulante orale? Giulia Magnani 27 Gennaio, 2018

The clinical relevance of AMPLIFY programme

Status of anticoagulation therapy in 2016: Is there a need for venous revascularization?

Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

Updates in Diagnosis & Management of VTE

EXTENDING VTE PROPHYLAXIS IN ACUTELY ILL MEDICAL PATIENTS

PULMONARY EMBOLISM (PE): DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

Primary VTE Prophylaxis. Ponlapat Rojnuckarin, MD PhD Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand

Cancer Associated Thrombosis: six months and beyond. Farzana Haque Hull York Medical School

Results from RE-COVER RE-COVER II RE-MEDY RE-SONATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Obesity, renal failure, HIT: which anticoagulant to use?

DVT - initial management NSCCG

Venous thrombosis is common and often occurs spontaneously, but it also frequently accompanies medical and surgical conditions, both in the community

Duration of anticoagulation

New Oral Anticoagulant Drugs in the Prevention of DVT

CHAPTER 2 VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM

NOAC s across indications

ARTEMIS. ARixtra (fondaparinux) for ThromboEmbolism prevention in. a Medical Indications Study. NV Organon Protocol 63129

Simplified approach to investigation of suspected VTE

Inferior Venacaval Filters Valuable vs. Dangerous Valuable Annie Kulungowski. Department of Surgery Grand Rounds March 24, 2008

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2017 Toronto, ON

Medical Patients: A Population at Risk

Disclosures. What is a Specialty Vein Clinic? Prevalence of Venous Disease. Management of Venous Disease: an evidence based approach.

3/19/2012. What is the indication for anticoagulation? Has the patient previously been on warfarin? If so, what % of the time was the INR therapeutic?

Disclosures. DVT: Diagnosis and Treatment. Questions To Ask. Dr. Susanna Shin - DVT: Diagnosis and Treatment. Acute Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) None

New Anticoagulants Therapies

Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Thrombosis. Tom DeLoughery, MD FACP. Oregon Health and Sciences University

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

When and How to Use the Newly Approved Oral Anticoagulants to Treat Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE) Ian del Conde, MD

Anticoagulation: Novel Agents

Understanding Best Practices in Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism. Rajat Deo, MD, MTR

Acute and long-term treatment of VTE. Cecilia Becattini University of Perugia

Aspirin as Venous Thromboprophylaxis

Clinical Study Synopsis

C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School

Deep Venous Pathology. Eberhard Rabe Department of Dermatology University of Bonn Germany

A Review of the Role of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in the Acute and Long-Term Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

New Perspective in VTE Treatment in Acute Medically Ill Patients: Single vs. Dual Drug Approach. Dr. Johan Kurnianda, SpPD-KHOM

VTE Management in Surgical Patients: Optimizing Prophylaxis Strategies

Xarelto (rivaroxaban)

Understanding thrombosis in venous thromboembolism. João Morais Head of Cardiology Division and Research Centre Leiria Hospital Centre Portugal

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

CANCER ASSOCIATED THROMBOSIS. Pankaj Handa Department of General Medicine Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Venous Thrombo-Embolism. John de Vos Consultant Haematologist RSCH

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin Among Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing (2012) NICE guideline CG144

Top 5 (or so) Hematology Consults. Tom DeLoughery, MD FACP FAWM. Oregon Health and Sciences University DISCLOSURE

Epidemiology of Thrombosis in Patients with Malignancy. Cancer and Venous Thromboembolism. Chew HK, Arch Int Med, Feb Blom et al, JAMA, Feb 2005

Anticoagulation therapy following endovascular treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

Deep vein thrombosis and its prevention in critically ill adults Attia J, Ray J G, Cook D J, Douketis J, Ginsberg J S, Geerts W H

USE OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN OBESITY

Iliofemoral DVT: Miminizing Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

POINT OF CARE ULTRASOUND - Venous US for DVT

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis - Why Should We Care? Harry Gibbs FRACP FCSANZ Vascular Physician The Alfred Hospital

Updates in Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease

Venous Thromboembolic Disease Update

Reduced-dosed Rivaroxaban in the long-term prevention of recurrent symptomatic DVT The Einstein-Choice trial

Anticoagulation Therapy in SELECTeD Cancer Patients at Risk of Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism

Perioperative Management of the Anticoagulated Patient

The Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Has Warfarin Met Its Match? Michael P. Gulseth, Pharm. D., BCPS, FASHP Program Director for

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

Anticoagulation with Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and advances in peri-procedural interruption of anticoagulation-- Bridging

New areas of development for the direct oral anticoagulants

Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Diagnosis and Management of Venous Thromboembolism

Prevention and management of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) John Fletcher Wound Care Association of New South Wales

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

New Anticoagulants and Emerging Strategies

Challenges in Anticoagulation and Thromboembolism

Duration of Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Suspected Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis EVIDENCE TABLE

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (Review)

The Evidence Base for Treating Acute DVT

Acute and long-term treatment of PE. Cecilia Becattini University of Perugia

Transcription:

Expanding the treatment options of Superficial vein thrombosis with Rivaroxaban Athanasios D. Giannoukas MD, MSc(Lond.), PhD(Lond.), FEBVS Professor of Vascular Surgery Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessalia, Greece Chairman, Dept. of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa Larissa, Greece

DISCLOSURES Participation in CALISTO Trial sponsored by GLAXO Honoraria from BAYER and Leo

Annual rate per 1000 SVT is a frequent disease STEPH 1 and EPI-GETBO 2 : Two French prospective epidemiological studies with comparable methodology 1.5 0.64 [0.55 0.74] 1.24 [1.12 1.36] 0.60 [0.52 0.69] 1.0 0.5 0 SVT STEPH DVT EPI-GETBO PE EPI-GETBO 1. Frappé P. et al. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12:831 838. 2. Oger E. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83:657 660. DVT = deep vein thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism; SVT = superficial vein thrombosis.

Concomitant DVT or PE is frequent in patients with SVT at first presentation Setting Study POST [1.4] OPTIMEV [2,4] STEPH [3,4] Secondary/tertia ry Secondary/tertiary Primary No. of SVT patients 844 788 171 Concomitant DVT or PE, % 24.9 29.4 26.3 Concomitant DVT*, % 23.5 28.8 24.6 Concomitant symptomatic PE, % 3.9 6.8 4.7 *40 to 50% are proximal DVT, 40 to 45% are non-contiguous to SVT Systematic research of PE symptoms and ultrasonography 1. Decousus H. et al. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152:218 24. 2. Galanaud JP. et al. Thromb Hemost 2011; 105:31 39. 3. Frappé P. et al. J Thromb Hemost 2014; 12:831 838. 4. Decousus H. et al. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13 Suppl 1:S230 237. DVT = deep vein thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism; SVT = superficial vein thrombosis.

Patients with isolated SVT* are at significant risk of subsequent symptomatic DVT or PE at 3 6 months Study/setting Treatment received DVT, % PE, % STENOX 3 months, N = 427 VESALIO 3 months, N = 164 LMWH for 12 days in 50% 2.8 0.7 LMWH for 30 days in all 2.4 0.6 POST 3 months, N = 600 One or more anticoagulants in 90.5% (LMWH for a median of 11 days) 2.8 0.5 OPTIMEV 3 months, N = 499 CALISTO* 77 days, N = 1,500 STEFLUX 3 months, N = 648 Van Weert 6 months, N = 185 Danish Registry 3 months, N = 10,973 Anticoagulants in 76.4% (for > 45 days in 24.6%) Placebo (patients at high risk excluded) * SVT without concomitant DVT or PE at first presentation. Decousus H. et al. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13 Suppl 1:S230 237. 0.6 0.6 1.3 0.4 LMWH for 10 30 days in all 3.1 0.3 No treatment in 83% 2.7 0.5 No routine anticoagulant treatment 2.5 0.9 DVT = deep vein thrombosis LMWH = low-molecular-weight heparin PE = pulmonary embolism SVT = superficial vein thrombosis

SVT close to SFJ

Guidelines (ACCP - International Consensus) Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily for at least 4 weeks is an effective treatment (Grade 1b) LMWH in intermediate doses for at least one month is recommended (Grade 2a )

2010;363:1222 1232

Fondaparinux for the treatment of superficial-vein thrombosis in the legs (Calisto) Décousus, H, Prandoni P, Mismetti P, Bauersachs R, Boda Z, Brenner N, Laporte S, Matyas L, Middeldord S, Sokurenko G, Leizorovicz A; N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 13: 1222 1232 Inclusion Hospitalized or non-hospitalized patients 18 yrs With acute symptomatic SVT of the lower limbs at least 5 cm long and with thrombus head > 3 cm from the saphenofemoral or sapheno-popliteal junctions Confirmed by standard compression ultrasonography (CUS) Without concomitant DVT or PE at inclusion Able and willing to provide written informed consent Exclusion Symptomatic or asymptomatic DVT on qualifying CUS and/or PE SVT with thrombus head within 3 cm from the sapheno-femoral or sapheno-popliteal junctions SVT with an history of documented DVT/PE within the last 6 months SVT in patients with active cancer i.e. cancer within the last 6 months SVT in severe renal impairment (<30 ml/min) Treatment with anticoagulant therapy > 48 hours prior to inclusion Requirement for ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction or thrombectomy SVT following sclerotherapy or resulting as a complication of an IV line

Primary Outcomes Primary efficacy outcome: Composite of symptomatic thromboembolic complications and all-cause death up to Day 47 in all randomized patients (ITT) Symptomatic non-fatal (confirmed by CT or V/Q scans) or fatal PE Symptomatic DVT (confirmed by CUS) Symptomatic extension of the initial SVT, at 3 cm from the saphenofemoral junction (confirmed by CUS) Symptomatic recurrent SVT (confirmed by CUS) All-cause death Primary safety outcome: Major bleeding and death up to Day 47 in all randomized patients having received 1 treatment dose

CALISTO study The primary efficacy outcome at day 47 (death from any cause or symptomatic PE, symptomatic DVT, or symptomatic extension to the saphenofemoral junction or symptomatic recurrence of DVT) occurred in 0.9% of patients in the fondaparinux group and 5.9% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The rate of PE or DVT was 85% lower in the fondaparinux group at day 47. Similar risk reductions were observed at day 77. No difference was observed in major bleeding between the two groups. Decousus H et al. CALISTO Study Group. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1222 1232

Placebo-controlled study (CALISTO) with clinical outcome in SVT patients 3.002 patients with isolated SVT Placebo 45 days Primärer Wirksamkeits-Endpunkt HR, 0,14 (95% CI, 0,08 to 0,26; p<0,001) 2.5 mg Fondaparinux End of treatment Behandlungsende Death Tödlich Severe Schwer Clin Klin.relev. rel. Light Leicht all Gesamt Safety endpoint: bleeding (%) 0 0,5 1 Tage Décousus H, Prandoni, P, Mismetti, P, Bauersachs R, Boda, Z, et al. : N Engl J Med. 2010;363(13):1222-32. Fondaparinux Plazebo

Goldman and Ginsberg. NEJM 2010;363:1278 Historical comparisons have shown extremely low mortality among untreated pts with SVT, which supports an initial no anticoagulation treatment approach unless conservative measures fail to resolve symptoms or DVT develops Treatment with Fondaparinux for 45 days may be reasonable in case of severe symptoms, thrombosis in the proximal saphenous vein, or in recurrent disease Cost-effectiveness issues Therapy with Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily for 45 days costs $2,124 to $7,380

3-month incidence of symptomatic VTE (%) CALISTO in Real-world practice 5.0 5 4,5 4.5 4.0 4 3,5 3.5 3.0 3 2,5 2.5 2.0 2 1,5 1.5 1.0 1 0,5 0.5 0 p=0.06 DVT or PE DVT PE Patients that could have been included in CALISTO Patients that would not have been included in CALISTO Décousus H, Leizorovicz A, Bauersachs R, et al: N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1222-1232 Galanaud JP, J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 1004-11. Galanaud JP. The OPTIMEV study. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 31-9.

CALISTO: High-risk patients In the placebo group, subgroup analyses showed an increased incidence of symptomatic VTE complications at Day 47 (primary efficacy endpoint) in patients presenting one of the following characteristics at inclusion: Age > 75 yrs BMI 30 kg/m 2 CrCl < 50 ml/min History of DVT/PE (> 6 months previously) History of SVT (> 3 months previously) Absence of varicose veins at inclusion SVT abovethe knee SVT involving the great saphenous vein Distance between the thrombus head and the SFJ < 10 cm Decousus H. et al. for the CALISTO Study Group. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1222 1232. BMI = body mass index; CrCl = creatinine clearance; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism; SFJ = sapheno-femoral junction; SVT = superficial vein thrombosis; VTE = venous thromboembolism.

Superficial vein thrombosis treated for 45 days with rivaroxaban versus fondaparinux: rationale and design of the SURPRISE trial Werth S, Bauersachs R, Gerlach H, Rabe E, Schellong S, Beyer- Westendorf J J Thromb Thrombolysis (2016) 42:197 204 Open-label, masked endpoint, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3b trial Patients aged 18 years or older with symptomatic superficialvein thrombosis 27 sites (academic, community hospitals, and specialist practices) in Germany. Randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 10 mg oral rivaroxaban or 2 5 mg subcutaneous fondaparinux once a day for 45 days.

Inclusion criteria Acute symptomatic supragenicular SVT of the leg And at least one of the following risk factors Age over 65 years Male sex History of DVT/PE/SVT History of cancer or active cancer Autoimmune disease SVT of non-varicose veins Thrombus extension of at least 5 cm Proximal thrombus end with more than 3 cm distance to the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) Age over 18 years Written informed consent

Efficacy outcome Primary Composite of death from any cause symptomatic PE (objectively confirmed by ventilationperfusion scanning, helical computed tomography, pulmonary angiography, or autopsy) symptomatic DVT (confirmed by ultrasonography or venography) symptomatic SVT extension towards the saphenofemoral junction symptomatic SVT recurrence (confirmed by ultrasonography) up to day 47 Secondary the composite primary efficacy outcome up to day 90 the separate items of the primary efficacy outcome up to day 47 and day 90 the rate of symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic proximal DVT, VTE-related death the rates of emergency surgery for SVT

Safety outcome Primary Clinically overt major bleeding according to the ISTH definition, defined as an overt bleeding that is either associated with a fall of haemoglobin of 2 g/l or more, leading to a transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells or whole blood occurring into a critical site such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, pericardial, intraarticular, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, retroperitoneal fatal bleeding. Secondary Clinically relevant non-major, minor and any bleeding and death from any cause. Clinically relevant, non-major bleeding (ISTH definition): any overt bleeding that is associated with a medical intervention by a healthcare professional, or an unscheduled physician s contact (presence or telephone contact), a temporary or complete cessation of study drug, any relevant discomfort to the patient (pain, impairment of activities of daily life).

Fondaparinux vs. Rivaroxaban in SVT patients with a higher VTE-risk : SURPRISE-Study SVT in the thigh and Age > 65 years or Male gender or Previous DVT/PE/SVT or History of or active cancer or Autoimmunologic disease or SVT in non-varicose veins or 472 risk-patients with isolated SVT Rivaroxaban 10 mg 2.5 mg 45 days Fondaparinux J. Beyer-Westendorf,SM Schellong, H. Gerlach, E. Rabe, J.I. Weitz, K. Jersemann, K. Sahin, R. Bauersachs THE LANCET HAEMATOLOGY-D-17-00004 0030 S2352-3026(17)30014-5 2017

Patients and results

Fondaparinux vs. Rivaroxaban in SVT patients with a higher VTE-risk : SURPRISE-Study SVT in the thigh and Age > 65 years or Male gender or Previous DVT/PE/SVT or History of or active cancer or Autoimmunologic disease or SVT in non-varicose veins or 472 risk-patients with isolated SVT Rivaroxaban 10 mg 2.5 mg Fondaparinux 45 days HR, 1.1(0.5 to 2.2); p=0.047 for non-inferiority HR 6.1;(0.7-50.3) days days J. Beyer-Westendorf,SM Schellong, H. Gerlach, E. Rabe, J.I. Weitz, K. Jersemann, K. Sahin, R. Bauersachs THE LANCET HAEMATOLOGY-D-17-00004 0030 S2352-3026(17)30014-5 2017

Conclusions 1 In patients on higher risk Rivaroxaban 10 mg od is not inferior to Fondaparinux 2.5 mg od in preventing overall VTE complications in SVT patients (3% vs. 2%) During treatment in both groups VTE was very rare but DVT occured slightly more frequent in the Rivaroxaban group (3/211 vs. 1/224) During follow up a rebound phenomenon was present in both groups resulting in primary efficacy outcome after 90 days in 15 patients (7%) in both groups Again DVT was more frequent in the Rivaroxaban group (6/211 vs. 2/224) No PE occured

Conclusions 2 Adverse events where rare in both groups No major bleeding occured The incidence of minor bleeding until day 45 was the same in both groups (6%) Clinically relevant non-major bleeding occured more often in the Rivaroxaban group (6/211 vs. 1/224)

Conclusions 3 Low dose (prophylactic dosage) of Rivaroxaban or Fondaparinux is effective in preventing VTE complications in SVT SVT patients on higher risk for VTE complications (SURPRISE) may benefit from anticoagulation longer than 45 days compared to low risk patients (CALISTO)

Summary SVT is part of VTE like DVT and PE VTE complications of SVT are frequent In patients with a low risk 45 days of a prophylactic dose of fondaparinux is enough High risk patients may need a prolonged treatment Pooled analyses of outcome studies are neededto better identify «risk-partients»

Thank you very much for the attention