Phase I/II Trial of the Combination of Lenalidomide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Similar documents
Phase 1 Study of ARRY-520 and Carfilzomib in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car- Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car- Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Pomalidomide (CC4047) Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone as Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. Lacy MQ et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(30):

Proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) refractory multiple myeloma is associated with inferior patient outcomes

A Phase 1 Trial of Lenalidomide (REVLIMID ) With Bortezomib (VELCADE ) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Role of Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: The Changing Landscape

Phase I Study of Carfilzomib and Panobinostat for Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: A Multicenter MMRC Clinical Trial

CME Information LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Multiple Myeloma Updates 2007

Novel Combination Therapies for Untreated Multiple Myeloma

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 2. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; 3

MSN, ANP-BC, AOCNP1*, R.

Myeloma update ASH 2014

Disclosures. Membership of Advisory Committees: Research Support/ PI: Celgene Corporation Millennium Pharmaceuticals Johnson & Johnson

Multiple Myeloma Brian Berryman, M.D. March 8 th, 2014

ClaPD (Clarithromycin/[Biaxin ], Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco & Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

Treatment of elderly multiple myeloma patients

Progress in Multiple Myeloma

Disclosures. Consultancy, Research Funding and Speakers Bureau: Celgene Corporation, Millennium, Onyx, Cephalon

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; 11 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Regimen Protocols IRD or RID: Ixazomib citrate/lenalidomide/dexamethasone

Study Rationale. Reference: Chanan-Khan, A., et al., ASH 2010, Abstract#1962. Reference: Whiteman, K., et al, AACR, 2009, Abstract#2799

IMiDs (Immunomodulatory drugs) and Multiple Myeloma

To Maintain or Not to Maintain? Immunomodulators vs PIs Yes: Proteasome Inhibitors

Debate: Is transplant a necessity or a choice? Focus on the necessity for CR and MRD. Answer: NO

Terapia del mieloma. La terapia di prima linea nel paziente giovane. Elena Zamagni

ASCO Analyst & Investor Webcast. June 1, 2018

Smoldering Myeloma: Leave them alone!

Highlights from EHA Mieloma Multiplo

Multiple Myeloma: ASH 2008

CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT

Is autologous stem cell transplant the best consolidation after initial therapy?

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

Disclosures for Palumbo Antonio, MD

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Indolent and Mantle-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Role of consolidation therapy in Multiple Myeloma. Pieter Sonneveld. Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands

Curing Myeloma So Close and Yet So Far! Luciano J. Costa, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; 3

Consolidation and maintenance therapy for transplant eligible myeloma patients

Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to treat multiple myeloma (MM)

Living Well with Myeloma Teleconference Series Thursday, March 24 th :00 PM Pacific/5:00 PM Mountain 6:00 PM Central/7:00 PM Eastern

At Fox Chase Cancer Centre during study participation

Future Strategies For Refractory Myeloma. Marc S. Raab

Should we treat Smoldering MM patients? María-Victoria Mateos University Hospital of Salamanca Salamanca. Spain

Initial Therapy For Transplant-Eligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma. Michele Cavo, MD University of Bologna Bologna, Italy

Standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not eligible for a transplant

Abstract. Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 2 Hospital-12-de-Octubre, Madrid, Spain; 3

Michel Delforge Belgium. New treatment options for multiple myeloma

POMALYST (pomalidomide) for Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

Highlights in multiple myeloma

Oncology Highlights ASCO 2011 MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Multiple Myeloma: Induction, Consolidation and Maintenance Therapy

COMy Congress The case for IMids. Xavier Leleu. Hôpital la Milétrie, PRC, CHU, Poitiers, France

How to Integrate the New Drugs into the Management of Multiple Myeloma

Plasma cells in bone marrow. Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Novel Approaches. Approach to Progressive MM. Approach to Initial Therapy

Update on Multiple Myeloma Treatment

TREATING RELAPSED / REFRACTORY MYELOMA AT THE LEADING EDGE

Optimizing the use of lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: consensus statement

Management of Multiple

Eltanexor (KPT-8602), a Second Generation Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, in Patients with Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Updates in Multiple Myeloma: 12 months in 10 minutes

Unmet Medical Needs and Latest Multiple Myeloma Treatment

How I Treat Transplant Eligible Myeloma Patients

Tolerability and activity of chemo-free triplet combination of umbralisib (TGR-1202), ublituximab, and ibrutinib in patients with advanced CLL and NHL

Long-term ixazomib maintenance is tolerable and improves depth of response following ixazomiblenalidomide-dexamethasone

New IMWG Response Criteria

University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; 8 Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 9

Consolidation after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantion

Christine Chen Princess Margaret Cancer Centre September 2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Treatment of elderly patients with multiple myeloma

ANCO: ASCO Highlights 2018 Hematologic Malignancies

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 2 Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; 3

The TOURMALINE-MM1 study: results and expert insights

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

Novel Treatment Advances and Approaches in Management of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma, 25 (45) years of progress. The IFM experience in patients treated with frontline ASCT. Philippe Moreau, Nantes

DARA Monotherapy Studies

MULTIPLE MYELOMA AFTER AGE OF 80 YEARS

REVLIMID Dosing Guide

Managing Major Adverse Events in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Nursing s Role in the Management of New Oral Chemotherapy Agents


New Drugs on the Horizon Providing Hope for Multiple Myeloma Patients Kenneth C. Anderson, M.D.

Approach to the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. S. Vincent Rajkumar Professor of Medicine Mayo Clinic

Cost-effectiveness of Daratumumab (Darzalex ) for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Choosing upfront and salvage therapy for myeloma in the ASEAN context

REVLIMID IN COMBINATION WITH DEXAMETHASONE snda GRANTED APPROVAL BY FDA FOR TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Multiple Myeloma What is New? Can we talk cure? Rafat Abonour, M.D.

The 2010 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium Oral Abstract Session: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel and Hepatobilliary Tract

Horizon Scanning Centre November Pomalidomide for multiple myeloma third line SUMMARY NIHR HSC ID: 4436

Managing patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Case

Antibodies are a standard part of first relapse management in multiple myeloma (MM): Yes

Combining carfilzomib and panobinostat to treat relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results of a Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium Phase I Study

Disclosure. Study was sponsored by Karyopharm Therapeutics No financial relationships to disclose Other disclosures:

Transcription:

Phase I/II Trial of the Combination of Lenalidomide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Jatin J Shah, MD 1, Robert Z. Orlowski, MD, PhD 1, Raymond Alexanian, MD 1, Michael Wang, MD 1, Sheeba Thomas, MD 1, Muzaffar H. Qazilbash, MD 2, Simrit Parmar, M.D. 2, Nina Shah, MD 2, Qaiser Bashir, MD 2, Uday Popat, MD 2 and Donna Weber, MD 1 1 Lymphoma & Myeloma, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 2 SCT/CT Unit 423, UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr., Houston, TX

Disclosures Research Funding: Onyx, Celgene, Novartis, Array Biopharma, Millennium Speaking : None Advisory Board: Onyx, Celgene, Array

Background Combination of Lenalidomide (Len) and high dose dexamethasone (D) has demonstrated overall response rates (ORR) of 60% in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) 40% of patients have disease refractory and do not respond to Lenalidomide/dex; and those who do respond will ultimately develop disease resistance and become refractory to Lenalidomide/dex Strategies to improve outcome Develop novel, more potent Immunomodulatory drugs including Pomalidomide Understanding and Targeting mechanisms of Lenalidomide resistance

Lenalidomide Resistance Gene expression profiling of Lenalidomide refractory cells identify Wnt/β-catenin cascade as the most commonly dysregulated pathway Preclinical studies have demonstrated Lenalidomide resistance is mediated via the wnt-β-catenin pathway which can be modulated by Thalidomide Bjorklund C C et al. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:11009-11020

Background / Rationale The minimal overlapping side effect profile Lenalidomide and Thalidomide and preclinical data provided the rationale for the combination of Lenalidomide, Thalidomide and dexamethasone We hypothesize that the combination will overcome Lenalidomide resistance and improve response rates The aim of this study was to determine the tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination and evaluate preliminary activity

Objective Phase 1: Primary Objective To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of lenalidomide and thalidomide and dexamethasone (Len/Thal/dex) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) Phase 2: Primary objective To determine the overall (CR + VGPR+ PR) response rate of the combination Secondary Objectives To determine the Clinical Benefit Rate To determine the Time to progression (TTP) To determine the Progression free survival (PFS) To determine Overall Survival Safety of the combination of LTD in patients with RRMM

Study Design Phase I: Bayesian Model Dose Escalation with 4 cohorts enrolling 18 patients Level -1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Dose Lenalidomide 15 mg / Thalidomide 50 mg / dexamethasone Lenalidomide 15 mg / Thalidomide 100 mg / dexamethasone Lenalidomide 25 mg / Thalidomide 100 mg / dexamethasone Lenalidomide 25 mg / Thalidomide 200 mg / dexamethasone Phase II: 36 patients enrolled at MRD + 10 additional patients with Lenalidomide refractory disease Patients treated until Progressive Disease

Dosing Schema Cycle 1-8: 28 day cycle Lenalidomide 1 21 Thalidomide 1 28 Dexamethasone 1 8 15 22 Dexamethasone dosing for cycle 1-2: 40 mg days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20; all subsequent cycles weekly dosing Last cohort of 10 patients with Lenalidomide refractory disease: weekly dosing started with cycle 1 Cycle 9 +: Maintenance Thalidomide decreased to 50 mg; Lenalidomide/dex unchanged All patients received full dose anticoagulation

Study Design: Inclusion Criteria Patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma with 1 line of therapy Adequate hematology, cardiac, pulmonary and renal function Patient were eligible regardless of prior exposure to Lenalidomide/ Thalidomide or disease sensitive/refractory Measureable Disease Able to take prophylactic anticoagulation: warfarin or equivalent agent

Phase I 18 patients were dosed based on Bayesian Model Dose Escalation Patients DLT Cohort 1 (len15 / thal 100) 3 0 Cohort 2 (len25 / thal 100) 6 1 Cohort 3 (len25 / thal 200) 9 2 DLT in cohort 2: Steroid induced toxicity, requiring reduction in dex dosing in cycle 1 DLT in cohort 3: G3 rash; asymptomatic G2 atrial fibrillation G3 hypertensive crisis and volume overload due to dexamethasone MRD : Lenalidomide 25 mg / Thalidomide 100 mg / Dex

Patient Demographics N = 64 Age (median) 65 (36-85) Male 40 (63%) Prior Lines of Therapy (median) 4 (1-12) ISS Stage Stage I 17 Stage II 15 Stage III 8 Stage n/a 24 Cytogenetics ( 4 missing) Del 13 24/60 (40%) Del 17 8/60 (13%) t(4;14) 3/60 (5%) t(11;14) 7/60 (12%) Unknown 4

Prior Therapies N = 64 Prior Regimens (median) 4 (1-12) Prior ASCT 49 (77%) Prior Thalidomide 36 (56%) Prior Lenalidomide 48 (75%) Refractory 44 (69%) Prior Lenalidomide exposed 4 (6%)

Results N = 61 Overall Response Rate ( PR) 31 (51%) Stable Disease 15 (25%) Minimal Response 8 (13%) Partial Response 19 (31%) VGPR 4 (7%) ncr/cr 8 (13%) Progressive Disease 7 (11%) Clinical Benefit Ratio ( MR) of 64% 3 patients were not evaluable for efficacy as they withdrew consent during first cycle

Response rates in Lenalidomide Refractory Disease N = 41* Overall Response 13 (34%) Stable Disease 12 (29%) Minimal Response 8 (20%) Partial Response 11 (27%) VGPR 1 (2%) CR / ncr 2 (5%) Progressive Disease 7 (17%) Lenalidomide Refractory: Clinical Benefit Ratio ( MR) of 51% Lenalidomide Naïve: Overall Response ( PR) of 14/16 (88%) *3 patients were not evaluable for efficacy as they withdrew consent during first cycle

Progression Free survival Median PFS 8.0 months

Overall survival Median OS 29 months

Survival Across Response PFS OS Stable Disease 4 months 10 month Minimal Response 7 months 21 months Partial Response 8 months 29 months

Survival in Lenalidomide Refractory Progression Free Survival Overall Survival Len Refractory : 6 months Len sensitive/naïve: 18 months Len Refractory: 18 months Len sensitive/naïve: not reached

Survival in High Risk: 17p Progression Free Survival Overall Survival Not Del 17p Del 17p Not Del 17p Del 17p 17p- : 7 months Without 17 p- : 8 months

Hematolgoic Adverse Events N=64 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Anemia 7 12 10 1 Thrombocytopnia 10 8 9 5 Neutropenia 4 4 13 6 G 3/4 Anemia : 17% G 3/4 Plt : 22% G 3/4 ANC : 30%

Non-Hematologic Adverse Events Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 3 ALT/AST 9 2 2 0 Creatnine 7 6 4 0 Dyspnea 11 19 6 0 Edema 21 8 4 0 PN 6 13 6 0 Rash 2 1 1 0 Diarhea 19 12 4 0 Constipation 19 12 4 0 Fatigue 3 22 16 5

Notable Serious Adverse Events N Atrial Fibrillation 2 Neutropenic Fever 3 Pneumonia 14 Altered Mental Status 5 Cardiac Arrest 1 Hypertensive Crisis 1 Hyperglycemia 2 Weakness/fatigue 5 Pulmonary Emboli / DVT 2 SPM 1 (Basal cell)

Conclusions The Maximum Recommended dose is concurrent Lenalidomide 25 mg Thalidomide 100 mg / dex The combination is very well tolerated with a manageable side effect profile; 2 pt with VTE Majority adverse event are steroid related The combination of Concurrent LTD is highly active with a ORR of 51% and CBR of 64%. Remissions are durable with a PFS of 8 months The combination is active in Lenalidomide refractory patients with a CBR of 51% and PFS of 6 months Additional studies are needed to confirm role addition of thalidomide Targeting Mechanisms of Resistance is important Imid Sequencing

41 pt Len refractory 25 had prior Thal CBR: 13/25 (52%)